Legal Analyst / Host (2:49)
No, Judge Curry never bought what the Attorney General Pam Bondi was selling, never picked up what she was laying down, that she was able to ratify what Lindsey Halligan did as a U.S. attorney or a special attorney because she was able to look at a transcript that didn't exist. No, Judge Curry said, among other things and for other reasons, I'm going to dismiss the indictments of both James Comey and Letitia James. And I'm going to bounce Lindsey Halligan as having been improperly, unconstitutionally and illegally appointed in violation of the appointments clause, in violation of 28 USC section 546, and therefore everything that she did was what we call ultra vares or against the law and void bye bye indictments. Now, it means something different for James Comey, former FBI Director, than it means for Letitia James. Let me tell you up front what's gonna happen now besides the inevitable emergency appeal by Donald Trump, besides the inevitable, you know, you know, attempt to overturn what Judge Curry just did and to see if the United States Supreme Court decides to weigh in as well after the fourth Circuit. Besides, Judge Curry has declared that there is a vacancy in the Eastern District of Virginia, U.S. attorney's office. And step back. Pam Bondi and Donald Trump, you're not able to fill it because she has said in her order it can only be filled at present the vacancy by the district court judges of the Eastern District of Virginia. Now, that's one of the reasons they brought her up from South Carolina, because they didn't want her to have a conflict. So now the Eastern District of Virginia judges, if they're smart, and they are, they're gonna get together and they're going to appoint a U.S. attorney in lieu of Lindsey Halligan, which puts Judge Nachman off and Judge Walker in a weird position because even though the indictments have been dismissed, the criminal cases have not technically been closed yet. Nakmanoff has the case he's presiding over with James Comey and Judge Walker with Letitia James. I'm going to talk about that procedural twist in a minute, but you got the headline. Now, that was the ruling by Judge Curry not to Be confused by the ruling that we're waiting on by Judge Nachmanoff in the Comey case as to whether he's going to dismiss the indictment and close the criminal prosecution with prejudice once and for all because of an invalid. Because of sorry, vindictive prosecution by an abuse of power by Lindsey Allegan when she was acting as if she was the U.S. attorney when she is not. Now you know why Judge Curry kept calling Lindsey Halligan the indictment signer. The indictment signer or the government counsel never called her by her title. That's going to be decided by Nakmanoff sometime around between now, Thanksgiving or just after. And it all has a major implication for Comey because he's. His prosecution is out of time. The statute of limitations has run. Judge Curry has already ruled that Lindsey Halligan was invalidly appointed, so she was never able to obtain that indictment. So there was no indictment, defective or otherwise obtained within the statute of limitations of five years for a perjury charge against James Comey. And we're now almost two months after that. There's no time. You cannot bring new charges with a new grand jury and a new prosecutor, even if that one's validly appointed or confirmed because the statute of limitations on the perjury charge for James Comey has run. Letitia James is in a different boat. I'm glad you're here on Midas Touch Network for me to kind of give you this drill down. After you got the top line of the headline. I want to give you the more information. Right. Letitia James case is different. Letitia James was indicted for mortgage fraud. It's a bullshit case. We all know it. There were two grand juries. The head of the Major Crimes Unit, Liz Urie, was fired because she issued a memo that said you can't indict her. There's no mortgage fraud here, which is automatically reasonable doubt. You had a grand jury in Norfolk, Virginia that didn't indict you. Got a grand jury in Alexandria that did. It's a mess. But that's for another day because there's no statute of limitations issue. But at least we got rid of Lindsey Halligan, Donald Trump's hand chosen prosecutor. Right. Let me read to you from the pages that I think are the most powerful within Judge Curry's orders. There's actually two orders, but they're almost identical, except one is in the Comey case and one is in the Letitia James case. Let's go to page. Let's go to page 17. She's gone through one particular statute decides this. 28 USC section 546. She says it's clear on its face, the President or the Department of Justice gets one pick for an interim U.S. attorney. After that there's a split of. There's a split of power. President gets one pick. After that, he gets to keep going and try to get his confirmed nominee through the Senate, which he hasn't even put up anybody in the Eastern district of Virginia. There's nobody in the pipeline. But until then, the district court Judges pick the U.S. attorney. And they tried to do a series of interim U.S. attorneys. They had a U.S. attorney, she resigned on the day of the inauguration. Eric Siebert was picked by Pam Bondi, conservative Republican, but they fired him or forced him out cuz he refused to indict Comey and Letitia James. But that's. It's a single use ticket like at Disney. You don't get to come back the next day.