Podcast Host (2:45)
We got some breaking news. The firefight between the Chief judge of the District courts of D.C. jeb Boasberg and the Department of Justice continues. In a new order just released, the judge said, and I'm barely paraphrasing, you told me to go pound sand about giving 137 people you may disappear without due process rights and you're not going to give me a solution to provide them with due process rights. I choose a different path other than pound sand. In particular, Judge Boasberg on page four of his order says the following. Against this backdrop and mindful of the flagrancy of the government's violations of the deportees due process rights that landed the plaintiffs in this situation, the court refuses to let them languish in the solutionless mire that the defendants proposed, which is we can't bring him back from Venezuela. We don't want to bring him back from anywhere else and we don't want to do remote hearings of any type. Judge go pound sand. No, no. Federal judge order. Federal judge order beats go pound sand. Rock, paper, scissor. Michael Popak, you're on the Midas Touch Network and Legal af. We've been following this case very closely. It's called jgg. It's been brought by the American Civil Liberties Union in favor of 137 men migrants who the government claims without proof are members of Trend Aragua, a narco terrorist group and sent in the middle of the over the objection and orders of Jeb Boasberg back in March to to the torture prisons of El Salvador. Later, to get them away from Jeb Boasberg's jurisdiction, the Department of Justice went one better and sent them to Venezuela before the war with Venezuela. And now Jeb Boasberg having given the government the opportunity to propose a solution for the lack of due process that was provided to these people who would rather, based on a recent filing, who would rather be in custody in the immigration world of the United States than to be free in Venezuela or third countries. That's how much they are devoted to their cause. Jeb Boasberg has joined that call and has now ordered the government to get these people back to the United States even if it means they're in custody and give them the habeas corpus and due process rights that the United States Supreme Court orders ordered that they have. Michael Popo let's get to it. I'll post this memorandum and opinion up on Legal AF substack for paid members. Here's what the judge says in this case. Page 1 the court offer offered the government the opportunity to propose steps that would facilitate hearings for the class members on their habeas corpus claims so that they could challenge their designations under the Alien Enemies Act. Apparently not interested in participating in this process, the government's responses essentially told the court to pound sand. The judge continues believing that other courses would be more productive than pounding sand. And in line with the Supreme Court's requirement outlined in the Abrego Garcia case, the court will now order the government to facilitate the return from third countries of those plaintiffs who so desire. It will also permit other plaintiffs to file their habeas supplements from abroad. How do we get here? The United States Supreme Court in another case involving a Maryland person Named Kilmer Abrego Garcia 90 Supported the federal district Judge there, Judge Zinnis, and said that she was right to order that Abrego Garcia, who was illegally sent in the same El Salvador in prison along with these 137 other men, that he was legally sent there that the court had the right and had the obligation to order that the United States facilitate his return back to the United States for a due process hearing Scaling a business that takes the right expertise at the right time Upwork helps growing teams quickly bring in specialized freelancers so you can move faster and take the business to the next level. Upwork is a one stop platform to find, hire and pay expert freelancers across web and software development, data and analytics, marketing, business operations and more. Upwork helps grow your business by giving you fast access to specialized talent across more than 125 categories so you can fill skill gaps, launch projects faster and scale support up or down with without committing to full time headcount. You can browse profiles, review past work and get help scoping the role so you can hire with confidence and get started quickly. Upwork also cuts down operational hassle by handling things like contracts and payments in one place so you can spend more time running the business. It's free to sign up and posting a job is easy with business plus you can access the top 1% of talent on on Upwork and with AI powered shortlisting you'll get matched to the right freelancer in under six hours. No endless searching required. Visit Upwork.com right now and post your job for free. That's Upwork.com to connect with top talent ready to help your business grow. That's up w o r k.com upwork.com now we all know what happened two months later. The Trump administration manufactured fake criminal charges against Abrego Garcia in Tennessee and brought him back and then threw him in jail. However, that case is about to get dismissed for vindictive prosecution by way of a judge in Tennessee. But the precedent set by the Abrego Garcia case is ringing in the ears of Chief Judge Boasberg. And he said to them, I've got to follow the Abrego Garcia precedent. Tell me how I can't follow that. And of course, the government just said, you're wrong. We're not going to do anything. Venezuela is in flux. It's a foreign affairs issue. We can't do anything about it. We have no solution. The judge is not taking that. Here's what the judge says about this issue. First, he compliments the American Civil Liberties Union. People should know the American Civil Liberties Union does regular contributions on the Legal AF YouTube channel with us. Here's what he said. Understanding that the situation in Venezuela remains in flux. On page two. And given the quote unquote law enforcement action in quotes, plaintiffs, the ACLU and the 137 men have commendably sought measured steps from the court. In other words, plaintiffs are being reasonable. You are not being reasonable. As explained at the hearing, they're only asking to be permitted to file supplemental habeas pleadings for the 137 deported, that those individuals in third countries, not Venezuela or the United States, can proceed with remote hearings and that the government provide as its expense returns to the US from third countries for those so desiring, so not even from Venezuela. And they know that if they go back to the U.S. they're going to be put in detention. The judge calls it a prudent approach which has not been replicated by their government counterparts. He says although the Supreme Court in Abrego Garcia upheld Judge Zinnis order directing the government to facilitate and effectuate the return, defendants at every turn have objected to these legitimate proposals without offering a single option for remedying the injury. After extended questioning at the hearing, the government finally represented that it prefers the return of the deportees, not on its time, to remote hearings, given its concerns with logistics and other evidentiary issues at such hearings. Here's an example where the parties briefed the issue. But at the hearing, they sort of got into it and developed a working outline that the judge is now adopting. But listen to what the judge says about the government. As I started the hot take with against this backdrop, and mindful of the flagrancy of the government's violations of the deportees due process rights that got them into this pickle to begin with, the court refuses to let them languish in a solutionless mire like that the defendants propose. He also says on page five it is worth emphasizing that this situation would never have arisen had the government simply afforded the plaintiffs their constitutional rights before initially deporting them. And then he ordered the following Plaintiffs shall give a notice as to what their countries their their clients are in the plaintiffs shall give a notice noting the number of plaintiffs who want to come to the United States. The government shall promptly return to plaintiffs, upon written request, their passports and travel documents and the government shall file a status report by March 13th explaining how and when it will transport any plaintiff. Now we know what's going to happen next. The government's going to file an appeal and it's going to go up to a D.C. appellate court. We'll find out what happens next. But Boasberg is right. The Trump administration has gone after him time and time again, including trying to get ethics charges brought against him, which were ultimately dismissed. But he is fighting for democracy. He is fighting for the rule of law. Till my next report, I'm Michael Popak.
