Loading summary
Sponsor Ad Voice
This episode is brought to you by Meundies Underwear. Drawers are like the Wild West. You never know what you're gonna pull out or what shape it's in. So upgrade your collection with the buttery, soft comfort of Meundies. Meundies signature fabric is as soft as a warm hug from your favorite sweater. Plus, it's breathable and oh, so comfy, making it ideal for all day wear. Get 20% off your first order, plus free shipping at MeUndies.com Spotify with code Spotify. That's MeUndies.com Spotify code Spotify.
Michael Popak
A federal judge in the District of Columbia has just ruled that Donald Trump's attempt to take transgender women and put them in male populations in prisons is cruel and unusual punishment, as that term is used under the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution. Entering a temporary restraining order against the Trump administration. And if you're counting at home, that is now the fourth temporary restraining order against the Trump administration in just the first two weeks. I'm Michael Popak. I'm doing a deep dive into Royce Lambert, who is a Republican District of Columbia federal judge, and how he is fired back and entered this temporary restraining order just entered late last night. Let's dive into it as. As and I'll read to you from the order. It's Jane Doe versus James R. McHenry. Who are those people? Well, Jane Doe is the way that you file a lawsuit when you don't want the identity in this case of three male to female transgender women to be disclosed for obvious reasons. In the MAGA world, we're going to be seeing a lot of Jane and John Doe filings in the that I'll be covering. Don't be fooled by it. It doesn't mean there's anything wrong with it. It's just a way, and I've done it before, that you anonymize, make anonymous the people that have been filed here only under the disclosure requirements of the judge. The judge, of course, ultimately knows who these people are and will ultimately know who they are. But for right now, for their own safety and security, they're known as Jane Doe cases. So when you hear me talk about it, that's what I'm talking about. James McHenry, who's he? He was the acting Attorney General of the United States. But now with Pam Bondi having been confirmed, she will then be substituted into this case. It will eventually be Doe versus Bondi. There's going to be a lot of Doe versus Bondi cases, but this is the first one and this one has to do with the rights of people who are transgender. What happened, as you may know, or I'll tell you now, as this flurry of inhumane, unconstitutional, illegal executive orders that came out on the first day on the job, one of them was an executive order that they refer to as the defending women from gender ideology, extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government. That's a mouthful for civil rights violations. This is, this is the same vein of them declaring that the federal government will only recognize two gender and then this is their DEI mole hunt to try to get quote woke ideology out of the government. And by doing so, completely undermining and eviscerating the rights of people who are transgender in every way, shape and form from denying gender affirming care to 19 year old or under with their families who are making this transition to stopping federal funds for gender affirming care or for people that are transgender. And here really, really in a disgusting or as Judge lamperth put it, 8th amendment cruel and unusual punishment way for forcing transgender women into back to male populations where they will be obviously raped, murdered, assaulted, all three or worse. So the lawsuit was brought and we're up on a temporary restraining order. Just a little bit of a breakout session on that four grounds that a judge has to find has been satisfied to enter any kind of temporary restraining order. It is likelihood that the likelihood that this plaintiff, these plaintiffs, these movements we call them are, are going to succeed on the merits when the case is over. So the judge has to look under the hood now and say, yeah, based on the evidence that you've already presented me, the briefing and the law, you're more likely to win than those people. We're in a civil standard. So it's just the probability has to be greater for the party that's brought the motion. That's one likelihood of success on the merits. 2. I'll combine inadequate remedy at law and irreparable harm. It means we've got to preserve the status quo of what existed before the executive order to avoid something that can't be remedied by money. And we can't fix this. One of these people get murdered. We can't fix that with money. So irreparable harm, inadequate remedy at law, and the fourth prong of a TRO in every case generally in federal court is that the balance of equities tips in favor of the public or this party. Okay? Judge goes through those standards, also determines whether, you know, he's got jurisdiction, whether they're standing, there's Injury, in fact, that's going on. And then once they do that, you get this kind of order from Royce Lampert. Let me read to you from it. He credited, he credited the evidence that was presented by the three transgender women, he says in bottom of page eight, to prove an 8th amendment violation based on theories such as failure to protect or deliberate indifference. That's the argument that the Bureau of Prisons, through Donald Trump, is deliberately indifferent to the civil rights of the prisoners by housing transgender women with men. A plaintiff must show that both an objective and subjective element are met. The plaintiff must be confronted with an objectively intolerable, intolerable risk of harm. And prison officials must knowingly or recklessly subject the plaintiff to such a known risk. With respect to the transfer provision, the plaintiff cited to various government reports and regulations recognizing that transgender persons. This is taking government evidence and using it against them. That transgender persons are at a significantly elevated risk of physical and sexual violence relative to other inmates when housed in a facility corresponding to their biological sex, which the defendants do not dispute. So they're already lost. Because if that means that the Trump administration, even the acting Attorney General, didn't dispute that transgender people housed in the wrong facility are subject to heightened risk of sexual and violent crime, game over. I mean, it's just, it is mind boggling. They even come into court and make any argument at all. The judge also recognized that all of these people are suffering from or have as a condition, what's called gender dysphoria, as the judge said on page one, a condition marked by significant distress and a host of psychological and physiological symptoms when a person lives in a manner conforming to their biological sex. For several years, including while they've been in custody, the plaintiffs have been prescribed and have generally received hormone therapy to treat their gender dysphoria. That's who we're talking about here.
Fatty 15 Ad Voice
I'm so excited to share with you guys an incredible scientific breakthrough to support our long term health and wellness. C15 is the first essential fatty acid to be discovered in 90 years. And get this. Studies have confirmed that it's three times better, broader and safer than Omega 3. It's pretty simple. Essential nutrients keep our cells healthy, which keeps us healthy. If you want to get sciency about it, Studies show that C15 works by strengthening our cells, improving our mitochondrial function and protecting us against damaging free radicals. The result, better long term metabolic liver and heart health. It turns out many of us are deficient in C15, which results in weaker cells that make less energy and quit working earlier than they should. All of that makes us age faster, sleep poorly, feel sluggish. Is this sounding familiar? Fatty 15 is a science backed, award winning vegan and pure C15 supplement. By replenishing our cells with that essential C15 nutrient, Fatty 15 effectively repairs cells and restores our long term health. Go science. Fatty 15 is made from a patented pure and oxidation resistant C15 powder derived from plants. It's vegan friendly, free of flavors, fillers, allergens or preservatives. C15 is the only ingredient in fatty 15. 100% pure C15 works in multiple ways. It repairs age related damage to cells, protects them from future breakdown, boosts mitochondrial energy output and activates pathways in the body that help regulate our sleep, mood and natural repair mechanisms that support our overall health. This functionality leads to a myriad of exciting benefits now and as we get older. Namely improved metabolic, liver and heart health, smoother functioning joints, deeper sleep and healthier hair and skin and nails. Now that's essential. It comes in a gorgeous reusable glass bamboo jar and refill capsules are shipped to your door quarterly in pouches made from recycled materials. Fatty 15 is on a mission to replenish our C15 levels and restore your long term health. You can get an additional additional 15% off their 90 day subscription starter kit by going to fatty15.com legalaf and use code legal af at checkout what the.
Michael Popak
Judge goes on to say after saying that the Trump administration has conceded that these people are at high risk to be to be harmed, injured or killed, the plaintiffs further claim on page nine of his order, the plaintiffs claim that placement in a male penitentiary by itself will exacerbate the symptoms of their gender dysphoria even if they are not subject to physical or sexual violence. In other words, even if they're not attacked, just being just being treated like a man with their gender dysphoria is going to exacerbate this psychological or other condition. And because they will be subject to searches by male correctional officers made to shower in the company of men referred to as men, forced to dress as men, or simply because the mere homogeneous presence of men will cause uncomfortable dissonance and with respect to the medical medication provision, because Donald Trump of course in a mean spirited way, inhumane way, also cruel and unusually punishment way, cut off or wants to cut off their medical treatment. The plaintiffs have also provided an affidavit from a physician explaining the numerous and severe symptoms that may arise from failure to treat gender dysmorphia effects, which the defendants likewise do not contest Again, the Trump administration's like, yeah, we think that's true too, Judge. Yeah, we think they're going to get harmed or injured or killed or raped. Oh, yeah, we think it's going to exacerbate their dysphoria, but we don't care. The judge is like, okay, well, let's stop right there. You've already conceded the main points I need for my temporary restraining order. Nor did the Just listen to this more just concession by the Trump administration. That's how balls they are in a federal court. Nor do the. Nor do the defendants dispute the plaintiff's allegations that the Bureau of Prisons is subjectively aware that transferring the plaintiff' to a male penitentiary would substantially increase the likelihood of them experiencing the parade of harms. Indeed, the government resources and regulations to which the plaintiff's gesture in their complaint strongly suggests the requisite awareness on the part of the BoP. This just shows you the callous disregard by the Trump administration. And what I've said before, they don't really think that a lot of these executive orders are going to actually pass muster in front of a federal judge. And they come into court like, well, you know, that sounds right, Judge. We agree. We agree with the plaintiff on that. Yep, we agree with the plaintiff on that. But still, you shouldn't enter the temporary restraining order. Are you effing kidding me? So the judge finally got around to issuing the order as follows, which applies as of 7pm last night, February 4th. Ordered that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order is granted. And it is ordered that the defendants are temporarily enjoined and restrained from implementing sections 4A and 4C of the Executive Order 141 68. That's the one I've been describing here on the hot take. Ordered that pending further order of this court, defendants shall remain and continue the plaintiff's housing status and medical care as it existed prior to January 20th. That means we call that in the law the status quo. The status quo is the condition that was going on before the bad act or bad conduct, bad regulation happened. So judge takes the time machine, the wayback machine, back to January 20th and says, you don't do a darn thing. Don't change any of your providing of medical care as of January 20th before he signed the executive order effectively, or the housing of these people. And we'll get back to you on future decisions. Now, temporary restraining order stays in place until further order of the court, which means he'll now set a briefing schedule over the next month or weeks for both sides to Argue what's called a preliminary injunction. Preliminary injunction is one step further than a temporary restraining order. It means that the judge will keep this injunction coming up on full briefing and a more full record for appellate purposes until the end of the trial. I will tell you that in my 35 years, I've never not obtained the preliminary injunction after I've won the temporary restraining order. Maybe you can count on, you know, maybe it's 1 out of 100 that they judge oh, well, no, I was wrong. I'm not going to enter the temporary restraining order, the preliminary injunction, even though I entered the temporary restraining order. I mean, he looks at the record a new it could, but I'm telling you, it's very, very high likelihood, over 90% that the preliminary injunction will be entered. Then Donald Trump and his Trump administration and Pam Bondi can go take an appeal to the D.C. court of Appeals and maybe try to get to the United States Supreme Court if they're even interested. They don't have to take that case. So that's the steps that we're going to watch here. But it starts with the courage of Royce Lampert. Now, I did another hot take here on the Midas Dutch network and legal af about the revenge of the Jan6, not insurrectionist, the Gen6 judges who watched in horror the all of the evidence against the Jan6 insurrectionist handled their sentencing, including up to 22 years for violent crimes and then watch Donald Trump pardon them all. And now they're ready. And more than half the cases, there's already been 32 filed. More than half these cases against the executive orders and the constitutionally inhumane ruling decisions by Donald Trump are going to appear before these same D.C. judges. Royce Lampert, he's a Republican nominee. He wasn't, he wasn't put in place by, by, by Biden, by Clinton, by Obama because they're all united in the rule of law. And now they've got their chance. Right. And they've got an ax to grind, if you will. I'm not saying they're not going to, you know, look at things objectively and independently as a judiciary, but you do the math. I'm going to continue to do it for you here with this analysis on Midas Touch and Legal af Got a brand new channel. Come on over to Legal AFMTN from Midas Touch Network. I'm curating that channel. We're bringing you six to 10 case videos a day. Two to three cases are being filed against Donald Trump a day, four temporary restraining orders. Find out all about it in real time as it happens over on Legal afmtn and help us hit our goal of half a million at our half birthday. We're almost there. We're at 450 already in just four months. So until my next reporting here or on Legalif the podcast or on Legalif the YouTube channel. I'm Michael Popak.
Fatty 15 Ad Voice
In collaboration with the Midas Touch Network, we just launched the Legal AF YouTube channel. Help us build this pro democracy channel where I'll be curating the top stories the intersection of law and Politics. Go to YouTube now and free subscribe @legalafmtn. That's eagleafmtn.
Navy Recruitment Ad Voice
You are no dummy, but you're kind of acting like one. You used to crush it in school, outsmarting opponents on the field. And now, well, you're still smart, but not exactly challenging yourself. You could be advancing nuclear engineering in the world's most powerful navy. You were born for it. So make the smart choice. You can be smart or you can be. Be nukesmart. Become a nuclear engineer@navy.com nukesmart. America's Navy forged by the sea.
Legal AF Podcast Summary
Podcast Information:
In this episode of Legal AF, host Michael Popak delves into a significant legal battle where a GOP-appointed federal judge in the District of Columbia has issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against former President Donald Trump’s administration. The TRO addresses the administration’s controversial policy of placing transgender women in male prison populations, a decision deemed by the court as cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment.
Timestamp [00:30] - Michael Popak:
"A federal judge in the District of Columbia has just ruled that Donald Trump's attempt to take transgender women and put them in male populations in prisons is cruel and unusual punishment, as that term is used under the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution."
Popak explains that this ruling marks the fourth TRO against the Trump administration within two weeks, highlighting the court's growing opposition to the administration's policies targeting transgender individuals in the prison system.
Popak breaks down the case, explaining the use of "Jane Doe" to protect the identities of the transgender women involved. This anonymity is crucial for their safety and security.
Timestamp [02:15] - Michael Popak:
"Jane Doe is the way that you file a lawsuit when you don't want the identity in this case of transgender women to be disclosed for obvious reasons."
He further clarifies that James R. McHenry, the acting Attorney General, will soon be replaced by Pam Bondi, indicating that future cases may be filed against her as well.
The core of the lawsuit revolves around an executive order titled "Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government." Popak criticizes the order for undermining the rights of transgender individuals by restricting gender recognition to two categories and targeting "woke" ideology within the government.
Timestamp [04:50] - Michael Popak:
"This is, this is the same vein of them declaring that the federal government will only recognize two genders and then this is their DEI mole hunt to try to get 'woke ideology' out of the government."
He enumerates the various ways the order negatively impacts transgender individuals, including the denial of gender-affirming care and the cessation of federal funding for such treatments.
Popak provides an in-depth analysis of Judge Royce Lambert’s decision to grant the TRO, outlining the four criteria the judge considered:
Likelihood of Success on the Merits:
Inadequate Remedy at Law and Irreparable Harm:
Balance of Equities:
Timestamp [06:10] - Michael Popak:
"The judge has to look under the hood now and say, yeah, based on the evidence that you've already presented me, the briefing and the law, you're more likely to win than those people."
Popak highlights excerpts from the judge’s order, emphasizing the administration’s own admissions that placing transgender women in male prisons poses significant risks.
Timestamp [09:39] - Michael Popak:
"Judge goes on to say... the plaintiffs claim that placement in a male penitentiary by itself will exacerbate the symptoms of their gender dysphoria even if they are not subject to physical or sexual violence."
This section underscores the comprehensive nature of the harms addressed, including both physical safety and psychological well-being.
The TRO is set to remain in effect pending further court orders, with a preliminary injunction likely to follow. Popak expresses confidence that the preliminary injunction will almost certainly be granted based on historical precedents.
Timestamp [12:00] - Michael Popak:
"I'm going to continue to do it for you here with this analysis on Midas Touch and Legal AF. Got a brand new channel... we're bringing you six to ten case videos a day."
He outlines the anticipated legal trajectory, including potential appeals to higher courts, while praising Judge Lambert for his decisive action against the administration’s policies.
Michael Popak provides critical commentary on the broader implications of this ruling, suggesting that Judge Lambert, a Republican nominee, is taking a stand that may reflect a shift within the judiciary towards upholding civil rights over executive overreach. He hints at underlying tensions within the GOP and the judiciary, referencing past cases related to the January 6th insurrection and the handling of executive pardons.
Timestamp [14:30] - Michael Popak:
"This just shows you the callous disregard by the Trump administration. And what I've said before, they don't really think that a lot of these executive orders are going to actually pass muster in front of a federal judge."
Popak encourages listeners to follow the ongoing developments through the Legal AF channels, emphasizing the importance of staying informed about legal battles that shape civil rights and political landscapes.
This episode of Legal AF provides a comprehensive and engaging analysis of a pivotal legal decision impacting transgender rights within the U.S. prison system. Through detailed breakdowns of the case, the executive order in question, and the judge’s reasoning, Michael Popak highlights the judiciary's role in upholding constitutional protections against executive policies deemed discriminatory and harmful. The discussion underscores the ongoing legal struggles and the critical importance of judicial oversight in safeguarding civil liberties.
Listeners are encouraged to stay tuned to Legal AF for further updates as the case progresses towards a preliminary injunction and potential appeals, promising continued in-depth coverage of this and other significant legal and political developments.
Notable Quotes:
Michael Popak [00:30]:
"A federal judge in the District of Columbia has just ruled that Donald Trump's attempt to take transgender women and put them in male populations in prisons is cruel and unusual punishment..."
Michael Popak [09:39]:
"Judge goes on to say... the plaintiffs claim that placement in a male penitentiary by itself will exacerbate the symptoms of their gender dysphoria even if they are not subject to physical or sexual violence."
Michael Popak [14:30]:
"This just shows you the callous disregard by the Trump administration. And what I've said before, they don't really think that a lot of these executive orders are going to actually pass muster in front of a federal judge."
Legal AF continues to be a vital resource for listeners seeking to understand complex legal issues and their intersection with political dynamics. Through expert analysis and timely reporting, the podcast ensures that its audience remains well-informed and engaged with the critical legal battles shaping the nation.