Whoa! SCOTUS Makes Major Ruling with Instant Impact - Legal AF by MeidasTouch

Summary

Legal AF by MeidasTouch
Episode Summary: "Whoa! SCOTUS Makes Major Ruling with Instant Impact"
Release Date: June 24, 2025

Introduction

In this explosive episode of Legal AF hosted by MeidasTouch Network, civil rights lawyer Ben Meiselas, national trial lawyer strategist Michael Popok, and former Chief Assistant District Attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo delve into a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) that has immediate and profound implications on due process and Fifth Amendment rights. Released amidst growing tensions surrounding immigration policies, this episode dissects the one-paragraph ruling that has reshaped legal landscapes and ignited passionate discourse.

Overview of the Supreme Court Decision

Timestamp 00:30

Michael Popok opens the discussion with a scathing critique of the Supreme Court's recent 6-3 decision, which overturned a Massachusetts federal judge's ruling requiring due process and proper notice before deporting poor immigrants to dangerous countries. Popok articulates his frustration, highlighting how the decision undermines established federal court rulings and exacerbates the injustices perpetuated by the Trump administration's immigration policies.

"He's putting people on planes and sending them to dangerous locations that they are not even from... without due process and without any notice at all."
— Michael Popok [00:30]

Analysis of the One-Paragraph Decision

Timestamp 03:00

Popok reads and dissects the succinct one-paragraph SCOTUS decision:

"The application for stay presented to Justice Jackson and referred to the court is granted. The preliminary injunction of the district court below is stayed pending the disposition of the appeal at the first Circuit."
— Michael Popok [~03:00]

He argues that this brevity signifies a troubling trend where complex legal issues are reduced to oversimplified judgments, thereby ignoring the nuanced arguments and evidence presented in lower courts. Popok emphasizes that such decisions reward unconstitutional behavior, particularly the Trump administration's pattern of circumventing due process in immigration enforcement.

Justice Sotomayor's Dissent

Timestamp 04:30

The discussion shifts to the powerful dissent written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Popok underscores Sotomayor's condemnation of the majority's ruling as an "abuse of power," asserting that the Court failed to uphold the doctrine of "unclean hands" which requires parties seeking equitable relief to act with integrity.

"She says, 'I cannot join so gross an abuse of the Court's equitable discretion to grant this day and...'"
— Michael Popok [04:30]

Sotomayor's dissent meticulously catalogs instances where the administration violated court orders, such as deporting a gay man to Mexico where he faced severe persecution, and sending individuals to Libya despite existing court mandates for due process. Popok highlights how this dissent serves as a historical testament to judicial resistance against executive overreach.

Implications and Consequences

Timestamp 07:15

Popok warns of the long-term implications of the SCOTUS decision. He asserts that the ruling emboldens the Trump administration to continue bypassing due process, undermining habeas corpus rights, and disregarding federal court orders without fear of repercussions. This erosion of judicial authority, he contends, effectively renders federal judges "powerless and toothless."

"We need regime change. It starts at the midterm elections and make sure that no more federal judges get appointed by Donald Trump from now until the midterms."
— Michael Popok [09:00]

He calls for immediate political action, urging listeners to engage in the electoral process to prevent further judicial appointments that could perpetuate these unconstitutional practices. Popok expresses his disillusionment with a Supreme Court dominated by Republican-appointed justices, likening it to a "super MAGA" majority that prioritizes partisan interests over legal integrity.

Call to Action

Timestamp 10:45

Concluding the episode with a fervent plea, Popok emphasizes the urgency of restoring balance within the judiciary. He advocates for rebuilding the House and Senate to ensure that future appointments to the Supreme Court reflect democratic and equitable values. By advocating for "regime change," he underscores the necessity of collective action to uphold the principles of due process and the rule of law.

"The Due Process clause represents the principle that ours is a government of laws, not of men... By rewarding lawlessness of the Trump administration, the court once again undermines that fundamental principle."
— Michael Popok [10:30]

Conclusion

This episode of Legal AF serves as a critical examination of a pivotal Supreme Court decision that has significant ramifications for immigration law and civil liberties in the United States. Through incisive analysis and impassioned commentary, Michael Popok articulates the urgent need for legislative and electoral responses to counteract judicial overreach and restore constitutional protections.

Listeners are encouraged to stay informed and engaged, leveraging their democratic rights to influence judicial appointments and uphold the integrity of the legal system.

Stay Connected:
Subscribe to Legal AF on YouTube at Legal AFMTN and follow the discussion on Legal AF Substack. Join us every Wednesday and Sunday for in-depth legal analyses and updates on the intersection of law and politics.

Transcript

A (0:00)

Does it ever feel like you're a marketing professional just speaking into the void? Well, with LinkedIn ads, you can know you're reaching the right decision makers. You can even target buyers by job title, industry, company seniority, skills. Wait, did I say job title yet? Get started today and see how you can avoid the void and reach the right buyers with LinkedIn ads. We'll even give you a $100 credit on your next campaign. Get started at LinkedIn.com results, terms and conditions apply.

B (0:30)

And breaking news. I'm sad to report that the United States Supreme Court 6 to 3 has just turned due process upside down and Fifth Amendment, Fifth Amendment rights upside down by in a one paragraph decision blocking a ruling by a Massachusetts federal judge that required get this notice and due process before you take a poor immigrant and remove them to a country that's dangerous. That's not where he's from, like the Sudan or Libya. That's what Donald Trump's been doing in the middle of the night without due process, without even real any notice at all in violation of federal court rulings. He's putting people on planes and sending them to dangerous locations that they are not even from third party removal, third country removal. And has been getting away with it and now has gotten away with it again because he's exploiting the emergency application process on a skeletal record with no oral argument, which results in all they gotta do is vote and make a one paragraph ruling and the entire world of our jurisprudence is turned upside down. Justice Sotomayor, who along with Kagan and Jackson, wrote a powerful dissent. I say that a lot. It's either Sotomayor, Kagan or Jackson. But Sotomayor said, in effect, that this court, the Supreme Court, is abusing its powers. She's never seen more abuse of power. And that the equitable relief that Trump is seeking, the stay, should have been denied him for one major fundamental reason. He has unclean hands. I mean, literally, I'm sure he has unclean hands. But that's a legal doctrine that says if you come to the court in equity and you ask the court to do something like grant a stay, you have to be blameless. You have to have clean hands. And then she cataloged from the record all the times this administration in this case has violated a judge's order. Sending a gay man to Mexico where he had been raped and tortured, sending him back to Mexico on false evidence provided to a federal judge that he agreed to go to Mexico. That's one dirty hand. Another person sent to Libya after the court ordered that they be given notice and due process. And the court and Donald Trump did it anyway. See, the Supreme Court is rewarding the unconstitutional behavior of Donald Trump every time they rule in his favor this way. And I'm trying to make heads or tails of it because I thought what came out of the body of law they developed on emergency applications over the last three months, I thought what the synthesis of that was is that at least they get notice, due process and get before a federal judge. Then how do you explain this one paragraph? And at some point right now, I'm going to read to you from the one paragraph because that is the entirety of the decision. And then I'll read to you from excerpts from Judge Justice Sotomayor. You're here on Midas Touch Network. I'm livid. You should be too. But we got to speak truth to each other first and understand and unpack this decision. And then where do we go from here? All right. Case comes up from Massachusetts, an emergency application. Once again, that's why Donald Trump is winning at the Supreme Court. He's stampeding them into decisions. He's up 8 to 4 at the Supreme Court. He's losing 96% at the trial court level, same amount at the appeals level. But he's 8 to 4 at the Supreme Court because he's got the numbers. The maga. Maga, Right. It's always six to three on these issues. I would have thought given the work they've already done on immigration and notice and due process, they would have not ruled this way. I was wrong. First, let me read to you from the one paragraph decision that rocked the world of due process. Ready? The application for stay presented to Justice Jackson and referred to the court is granted. The preliminary junction injunction of the district court below is stayed pending the disposition of the appeal at the first Circuit. That's about it. We're gonna let Donald Trump and we're gonna reward his bad and unconstitutional behavior and we're gonna let him continue to deport people in the middle of the night to dangerous countries that they have no relationship to without notice and due process. And we're okay with it. Support for today's episode comes from Square, your all in one business partner, making your day to day easier. From point of sale systems and payments to inventory and customer tools, Square brings everything together in one simple platform. So you can stay organized, sell anywhere and keep things moving. Look, I've seen Square in action all across the country. At cafes, boutiques, pop up markets, you name it. And every time, it's the same smooth experience, fast checkout, easy tap to pay, emailed receipts and staff who can actually focus on service instead of fumbling with tech. That's what makes the difference whether you're just getting started or or ready to grow. Square gives you the tools to do it all online or in person, from one location or many. It's intuitive, flexible and built to move with your business. Square keeps up so you don't have to slow down. Get up to $200 off square hardware when you sign up at square.com go legalaf that's s q U-A-R-E.com go legalaf run your business smarter with Square. Get started today. You know who's not okay with it? The three moderates and the fair minded people on the United States Supreme Court, Sotomayor reminds the Court before calling it an abuse of power that she's never seen before, that there is a doctrine of unclean hands and if you come to this court asking for equitable relief, you better have clean hands. And she details and documents all the violations of federal court orders that Donald Trump is being rewarded for now under the doctrine of unclean hands. So she says on page 10 of her dissent, joined by Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson for centuries, courts have closed the doors of equity to those tainted with inequitableness or bad faith relative to the manner in which they seek relief. That principle, rooted in the historical concept of the Court of Equity as a vehicle for affirmatively enforcing the requirements of conscience and good faith, ensures the courts do not become the the abettor of inequity here. In violation of the unambiguous tro, the government flew four non citizens to Guantanamo Bay and from there to El Salvador. She then goes on and talks about the Mexican citizen who was sent to Mexico where he had been raped under false evidence, and then concludes on page 11 in light of the government's flagrantly unlawful conduct, today's decision might suggest the government faces extraordinary harms. Yet even that is not the case rapidly. Rather, following a recent trend, the Court appears to give no serious consideration to the irreparable harm being suffered by these individuals factor. The judge also says that this is an abuse of power of this Court. She said, I cannot join so gross talking about her fellow Supreme Court justices. So gross an abuse of the Court's equitable discretion to grant this day and here's how she concludes this dissent. We should just create like a coffee table book of the best of Sotomayor, Kagan and Gitanji Brown Jackson's dissents because they will one day, by other people, our future generations of Americans will look back on these dissents and say they were in the right, they were on the right side of history, and that the super majority was wrong. And a stain and a scar on the United States Supreme Court. I, I assure you. Here's how she concludes. The Due Process clause represents the principle that ours is a government of laws, not of men, and that we submit ourselves to rulers only if under rules. Citing to a case from 1952 we call Youngstown, by rewarding lawlessness of the Trump administration, the court once again undermines that fundamental principle. Apparently, the court finds the idea that thousands will suffer violence in far flung locales more palatable than the remote possibility that a district court exceeded its remedial powers when it ordered the government to provide notice and process to which the plaintiffs are constitutionally and statutorily entitled. That use of discretion is as incomprehensible as it is inexcusable. Respectfully, but regretfully, I dissent. So do I. So do I. What happens next? Well, this is just going to embolden the Trump administration to continue to do what it's been doing, violating due process rights, violating habeas corpus rights, not giving proper notice, and it will encourage them to continue to violate federal court orders because there seems to be no repercussion. The federal courts try to hold them in contempt. The appellate courts take away that right. The Supreme Court doesn't want to hold anybody in contempt. So federal judges become powerless and toothless, and the Trump administration knows it. So they keep going for broke. They keep pushing the button because they know it's going to be successful and this Supreme Court's going to defend them. We need regime change. We need regime change. It starts at the midterm of elections and make sure that no more federal judges get appointed by Donald Trump from now until the midterms. And certainly no Supreme Court justices. We got to take back the House and the Senate. There's just no other explanation. I've had just to end it this way. The entirety of my life, the entirety of my adult life, no child life, has been a Republican dominated Supreme Court. We've never had in the last 50 years, plus the Democrats and the moderates and the liberals in charge of the Supreme Court. That's got to change. And I'm not, I'm not lamenting that because I could agree in the past with Sandra Day o' Connor or Brennan or black or black men or you name it, Supreme Court justices of the past. Breyer Kennedy I just can't abide this super MAGA bought and paid for by the Federalist Society super right wing majority. And I won't. And we'll continue to call it out here on Legal AF and on the Midas Touch Network. Take a moment, hit the subscribe button for Midas Touch. Come over and do the same thing for Legal af the YouTube channel and I'll be posting this particular decision so you can read it for yourself on the Legal AF substack. So till my next report, I'm Michael Popak in collaboration with the Midas Touch Network. We just launched the Legal AF YouTube channel. Help us build this pro democracy channel where I'll be curating the top stories the intersection of law and Politics. Go to YouTube now and free subscribe at Legal AFMTN. That's @legal AFMTN.