Loading summary
Sponsor Voice
This episode is brought to you by Lifelock. Not everyone is careful with your personal information, which might explain why there's a victim of identity theft every five seconds in the U.S. fortunately, there's LifeLock. LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats to your identity. If your identity is stolen, a US based restoration specialist will fix it, guaranteed or your money back. Save up to 40% your first year by visiting lifelock.com podcast terms apply.
Moms deserve our very best, Especially on Mother's Day. There's only one place I trust to deliver high quality mom approved rose bouquets 1-800-flowers.com this year 1-800-flowers wants to make sure all the mothers in your life get the best with double the roses for free. When you buy one dozen, they'll double your bouquet to two dozen roses. To claim the double roses offer, go to 1-800-flowers.com Spotify that's 1-800-flowers. Com Spotify, the official florist of Mother's Day. What makes a great pair of glasses? At Warby Parker, it's all the invisible extras without the extra cost. Their designer quality frames start at $95 including prescription lenses plus scratch resistant, smudge resistant and anti reflective coatings and UV protection and free adjustments for life. To find your next pair of glasses, sunglasses or contact lenses, or to find the Warby Parker store nearest you, head over to warbyparker.com that's warbyparker.com like your.
Favorite travel guide, T Mobile's network knows all the spots because T Mobile helps keep you connected from the heart of Portland to right where you are on America's largest 5G network switch. Now keep your phone and T Mobile will pay it off up to $800 per line via prepaid card. Visit your local T Mobile location or learn more@t mobile.com keepandswitch up to 4 lines of a virtual prepaid card. Allow 15 days qualifying unlocked device, credit service port in 90 plus days, device in eligible carrier and timely redemption required Card is no cash access and expires in six months.
Michael Popak
Well, the Department of Justice is about to fall into the mouth of Judge Paula Zinnis, who is the person the judge assigned to administer justice About Armando Abrego Garcia because they're lying to the judge and they're lying in their discovery responses which are required by the judge in order for her to get to the bottom of whether the government is in contempt for refusing to facilitate the release from an El Salvador in jail. I don't care which jail he's in. At present, he's in El Salvador when an order from a United States immigration judge says he should not be. And now they have filed. There's a new letter that just got filed jointly by the lawyers for Armando Abrego Garcia, including Quinn Emanuel and the Department of Justice on the other side. And apparently in the interrogatories, the questions under oath that Judge Zinnis ordered be filled out by the Trump administration. They're even lying about what the Supreme Court ruled. Misquoting the Supreme Court in its interrogatory response. What is going on here? All I know is Judge Zinnis is gonna be holding a status conference very soon, and she's about to throw the book at the Department of Justice. And we are here for it. You're here for it on the Midas Touch Network and Legal F. How'd we get here? After the judge amended her order and after the Supreme Court ruled in her favor 90 about her handling of the case, they said it was fine. The Supreme Court said it was fine and it was right. And it was appropriate under the constitution and due process to order for a judge, a federal judge, to order the Department of Justice and the Trump administration to do everything in their power to facilitate Abrego Garcia's release from the El Salvadoran prison that they put him in. And then the judge said, you're not complying. After a series of filings required by her by the Trump administration every day at 5 o'clock, it was obvious they were not going to tell her what steps they were taking to facilitate on a daily basis his return. Hiding behind the. It's diplomacy, it's foreign affairs. We're not going to tell you. That didn't make the judge happy. That didn't make the other side happy, who filed a motion for contempt. And the judge said, after seeing that there was not going to be compliance, but wanting to develop a full record, she said, why don't we do this? Let's develop a record through the discovery process. How? What say everybody? Let's do depositions, questions and answers under oath, in person. Let's do interrogatories, questions and answers under oath, in writing. Let's do requests to produce an exchange of documents, develop your record about possible contempt, and then we'll look at whether contempt is appropriate. And she also warned the Trump administration, and she told the lawyers for Abrego Garcia that if the Trump administration screws around with you in discovery, come back to me on an expedited basis and ask for sanctions, and they will be Granted. And that's sort of what we have in a new letter that was written late yesterday on letterhead, a joint report sent to the judge, which is a prelude to a status conference in which the judge is going to be very angry at the Department of Justice, especially when she sees the responses that they have put in place in response, for instance, to the interrogatories. And I'll just use one as an example before I read to you from parts of the letter so you know what's going on. Just to show you how sleazy and greasy the Trump administration is in thinking they can get away with anything, they actually misquote the United States Supreme Court ruling against them to change its terms so they can respond to it, creating a straw man of something that doesn't exist. How about quoting the actual United States Supreme Court decision? How about that? And getting it right instead of having typos where United States is spelled wrong. I mean, this was a lot of I'm going to wipe my butt with some paper and send it into the court. So here's what they wrote. And then I'm going to read to you from the actual orders, the first request, what we call interrogatory, a question under oath, but in writing as opposed to a deposition, was here's their objection. Defendants object to interrogatory number one, the first one, as based on the false premise that the United States can or has been ordered to facilitate a Brago Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador. Then they quote the Supreme Court decision, or they claim to quote the Supreme Court decision, and they say in parentheses and allegedly a quote, holding defendants should take all available steps to facilitate the return of Abrego Garcia to the United States as opposed to the release from custody. But that is exactly what the Supreme Court decision says, release from custody. Let me read it to you. So we all were all literally on the same page. On page two, let's get it right. The application is granted in part and denied in part. This was the Supreme Court and this was 9 0. The order of Judge Zinnis properly requires the government to, quote, facilitate Abrego Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador. So how can you possibly say that it's based on. The question is based on a false premise that the United States has been ordered to release somebody from custody. How can you say the Supreme Court decision doesn't say that? They say the Supreme Court decision says take all available steps to facilitate the return of Abrego Garcia to the United States. That's not what the Supreme Court decision said. It said exactly what they say. It doesn't say the weather.
It's heating up and your nighttime bedroom temperature has a huge impact on your sleep quality. If you wake up too hot or too cold, I highly recommend you check out Miracle Maids bed sheets. Miracle Maid sheets are inspired by NASA and use silver infused fabrics that are temperature regulating so you can sleep at the perfect temperature all night long. Using silver infused fabrics inspired by NASA, Miracle made sheets are thermoregulating and designed to keep you at the perfect temperature all night long no matter the weather so you get better sleep every night. Miracle sheets are luxuriously comfortable without the high price tag of other luxury brands and feel as nice, if not nicer than sheets used by some five star hotels. Stop sleeping on bacteria. Bacteria can clog your pores causing breakouts and acne. Sleep clean with Miracle. Upgrade your sleep as the weather heats up. Go to try Miracle.com legal AF to try Miracle made sheets today and whether you're buying them for yourself or as a gift for a loved one, if you order today you can save over 40%. And if you use our promo legal AF at checkout, you'll get a free 3 piece towel set and save an extra 20%. Miracle is so confident in their product it's backed with a 30 day money back guarantee, so if you aren't 100% satisfied, you'll get a full refund. Upgrade your sleep with Miracle made go to trymiracle.com legalaf and use the code legal af to claim your free three piece towel set and save over 40% off. Again, that's trymiracle.com legalaf to treat yourself. Thank you Miracle made for sponsoring this episode.
They said facilitate the rel Facilitate the release from custody in El Salvador. Judge Zinnis in her amended order said you got to take all available steps to facilitate the return to the United States, which is consistent with the Supreme Court's decision. Get your quotes right. It matters. I tell my people that work for me. If you have proofreading errors or bugs and you cite things wrong in your papers that you file with the court, you're just undermining your own credibility because the judge thinks if you can't spell something right, if you got typos, if you got quotes wrong from cases, you've lost all credibility. What else is wrong? I call it the cockroach theory. Because if you see one error in a filing by a lawyer, I assure you it's not just one cockroach. If you think you got One cockroach in your house. You don't. You got one cockroach that comes out one at a time. You got a dozen cockroaches. And that's what happens here. Judges go, I can't believe a word this person writes or says. But that just shows you they don't care about the federal courts. They completely have disdain the Trump administration. They don't even try to get things right. Here's what the letter says from the Abrego Garcia side and you can see where we're going with both sanctions for failure to comply with the discovery. They're trying to get ready for depositions. There's five depositions set in this case. One that's supposed to be for today, but you need documents you know properly in order to depose. Here's what they said on the eve of the first court order deposition concerning the government's failure to comply with this court's orders, the government responded to the plaintiff's discovery request by producing nothing of substance. Its interrogatory responses I just read to you one are similarly non responsive. First, the government artificially narrows the court's order to avoid complying with its obligations. We just saw a version of that. For example. The government refuses to respond to interrogatories it claims are based on the false premise that the United States can or has been ordered to facilitate a Brago Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador. That is exactly what the Supreme Court ordered them to do, word for word. Despite. And they go on, despite the Supreme Court's clear holding that the order properly requires the government to facilitate Abrego Garcia's release from the custody in El Salvador.
Which part of release from custody in.
El Salvador do you not understand? They also say on page two, the government refuses to answer several interrogatories or provide documents based on an assertion of privilege, some sort of governmental privilege or some sort of state secrets privilege. But they haven't done it properly as required by the case law. And then they lay out the discovery schedule, the deposition schedule from the. Then they insert what the plaintiff. What the government's position is. Listen to the government's position. As an initial matter, the defendants have in all respects and in light of the expedited nature of this discovery, put forward a good faith effort to provide appropriate answers. Already you know that's a lie. Consistent with the Supreme Court's instructions, the discovery here is aimed at answering the current location and custody of Abrego. It's actually Brego Garcia steps taken to facilitate his return to The United States. We haven't seen any of that in any of the filings. There's been about seven or eight different daily reports filed by the Department of Justice and other people there. Not one of them have said what steps have been taken. They say, oh, he's been moved to a new jail. He slept in a bed last night. But that's not what's been required. The government suggests that. They then go on to say the plaintiff suggests that the government has refused to answer interrogatories or produce documents on assertions of privilege. That statement is at best misleading because we provided some answers, but not all answers. I've done this for a long time. This is a supremely weak response by the government that's facing down the barrel of a federal judge that's been affirmed 9, 0 by the United States Supreme Court and twice 3. 0 each. So six different judges of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. She's riding high. There's, she's turbocharged. Judge Zenis, I would you pick if you think Boseberg and Zenith in the Supreme Court are the right courts to pick on for your political agenda, then you, you, the Trump administration, are more demented than I thought you were. I'm going to continue to follow the next steps. Here's the next steps that I'll come back here on the Midas Dutch network. We'll talk about it. One, Zinnis is going to hold a status conference. Two, she's not going to be happy with the responses by the federal government and she's going to start sanctioning them. Daily fines, maybe $10,000 a day, $100,000 a day. She's going to start finding people in contempt and that's going to be civil contempt on her own accord because it's in front of her with her inherent authority. And then she's going to let give the other side more discovery, more opportunity, more depositions as she tries to bring this land this plane. And at the end of the day, she's going to find the Trump administration in contempt. Could be criminal contempt, where she makes a referral for prosecution, or certainly civil contempt, which could also end up with somebody in jail under the civil enforcement powers of a judge. And you're here on the Midas Touch Network. Take a minute, hit the subscribe button, and then on top of that, come on over to Legal A F M T n for the YouTube channel over there that I curate and help us continue to grow that channel as well. Till my next reporting, I'm Michael Popak in collaboration with the Midas Touch network. We just launched the Legal AF YouTube channel. Help us build this pro democracy channel where I'll be curating the top stories the intersection of law and politics. Go to YouTube now and free subscribe @legalafmtn. That's egalafmtn.
Legal AF by MeidasTouch: Episode Summary
Episode Title: Whoa! Trump Admin Exposed Falsifying SCOTUS Ruling
Release Date: April 23, 2025
Hosts: Ben Meiselas, Michael Popok, Karen Friedman Agnifilo
Executive Producer: Meidas Media Network
In the April 23, 2025 episode of Legal AF by MeidasTouch, host Michael Popak delves into a high-stakes legal confrontation involving the Trump administration, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and a pivotal case overseen by Judge Paula Zinnis. The episode, titled "Whoa! Trump Admin Exposed Falsifying SCOTUS Ruling," provides a thorough analysis of alleged misconduct by the Trump administration in their legal filings related to the case of Armando Abrego Garcia.
[02:00] Michael Popak
Michael Popak begins by outlining the crux of the legal dispute: the DOJ's handling of Armando Abrego Garcia's detention in El Salvador. Garcia, subject to a U.S. immigration judge's order, was to be released from custody in El Salvador and repatriated to the United States. However, Popak asserts that the Trump administration has failed to comply with Judge Zinnis's directives, leading to significant legal ramifications.
[02:30] Michael Popak
Popak accuses the Trump administration of lying to Judge Zinnis both orally and in their written discovery responses. He highlights that during interrogatories—a formal set of written questions under oath—the administration misrepresented the Supreme Court’s ruling. Specifically, they allegedly misstated the court’s directive, leading to confusion about their obligations.
Notable Quote:
“At [02:30], Popak states, “They are even lying about what the Supreme Court ruled. Misquoting the Supreme Court in its interrogatory response. What is going on here?”**
[05:45] Michael Popak
Popak emphasizes that Judge Zinnis is poised to take decisive action against the DOJ. He explains that the judge has warned the administration about the consequences of non-compliance, including potential sanctions. Popak predicts that Judge Zinnis will hold a status conference where she may impose significant fines or even hold DOJ officials in contempt of court.
Notable Quote:
“At [05:45], Popak warns, “Judge Zinnis is gonna be holding a status conference very soon, and she's about to throw the book at the Department of Justice.”**
[07:59] Michael Popak
Popak critically analyzes the DOJ’s legal filings, pointing out numerous errors, such as typos and incorrect quotes of the Supreme Court decision. He introduces his "cockroach theory," suggesting that minor errors indicate widespread negligence and undermine the administration’s credibility.
Notable Quote:
“At [07:59], Popak asserts, “If you have proofreading errors or bugs and you cite things wrong in your papers that you file with the court, you're just undermining your own credibility.”**
[09:40] Michael Popak
Continuing his analysis, Popak details how the DOJ's responses to discovery requests are inadequate and nonresponsive. He criticizes the administration’s claims of good faith efforts, labeling them as deceptive. Popak anticipates that the DOJ will face sanctions for failing to comply fully with the court’s orders, which may include daily fines or even criminal contempt charges.
Notable Quote:
“At [09:40], Popak declares, “This is a supremely weak response by the government that's facing down the barrel of a federal judge.”**
[12:06] Michael Popak
In concluding the episode, Popak reiterates his expectation that Judge Zinnis will find the Trump administration in contempt of court, potentially escalating the legal battle. He underscores the importance of accurate legal documentation and the severe consequences of the administration’s alleged misconduct.
Notable Quote:
“At [12:06], Popak emphasizes, “She’s turbocharged. Judge Zinnis… she’s going to start sanctioning them. Daily fines, maybe $10,000 a day, $100,000 a day.”**
This episode of Legal AF provides a critical examination of the Trump administration’s legal strategies and their implications for judicial integrity. Michael Popak underscores the significance of accurate legal proceedings and the potential repercussions of the administration’s actions on their credibility and legal standing.
For listeners interested in the intersection of law and politics, this episode offers a comprehensive analysis of a high-profile legal confrontation, highlighting the ongoing struggles between governmental agencies and the judiciary in upholding the rule of law.
Subscribe and Follow:
Stay updated with the latest episodes of Legal AF by MeidasTouch by subscribing on your favorite podcast platform. For more in-depth legal and political analysis, visit the Legal AF YouTube channel curated by Michael Popak.