Loading summary
Heather Cox Richardson
Foreign 2025 this evening, lawyers for the Department of Justice told a federal court that the administration does not believe it has a legal obligation to return Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to the United States despite a court order to do so. The 29 year old Abrego Garcia came to the US about 2011 when he was 16 to escape threats from a gang that was terrorizing his family. He settled in Maryland with his older brother, a US citizen, and lived there until in 2019, he was picked up by police as he waited at a Home Depot to be picked up for work as a day laborer. Police transferred him to Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, or ice. After a hearing, an immigration judge rejected his claim for asylum, but said he could not be sent back to El Salvador, finding it credible that the Barrio 18 gang had been targeting him and threatening him with death because of his family's pupusa business. Ever since, Abrego Garcia has checked in annually with ICE as directed. He lives with his wife and their three children and has never been charged with any crime. The Department of Homeland Security issued him a work permit and he joined a union, working full time as a sheet metal apprentice. On March 12, ICE agents pulled his car over, told his wife to come pick up their disabled son and incarcerated Abrego Garcia, pressing him to say he was a member of Ms.13. On March 15, the government rendered Abrego Garcia to the infamous Sicot Prison for terrorists in in El Salvador, alleged to be the site of human rights abuses, torture and extrajudicial killings. The US government is paying El Salvador $6 million a year to incarcerate the individuals it sends there. On March 24, Abrego Garcia's family sued the administration over his removal. On March 31, the government admitted that its arrest and rendition of Abrego Garcia happened because of administrative error, but said he couldn't be brought back because in El Salvador he is outside the jurisdiction of the United States. It also accused him of being a member of the Ms. 13 gang and said that bringing him back to the US would threaten the public. On April 4, US District Court Judge Paula Chinise ordered the government to return Abrego Garcia to the U.S. no later than 11:59pm on April 7. In her opinion filed April 6, Judge Chinise wrote that although the legal basis for the mass removal of hundreds of individuals to El Salvador remains disturbingly unclear, Abrego Garcia's case is categorically different. There were no legal grounds whatsoever for his arrest, detention or removal. His detention appears wholly lawless. It is a clear constitutional violation. And yet administration officials cling to the stunning proposition that they can forcibly remove any person, migrant and US Citizen alike, to prisons outside the United States and then baldly assert they have no way to effectuate return because they are no longer the custodian and the court thus lacks jurisdiction. The administration had already appealed her April 4 order to the Supreme Court, which handed down a nine to nothing decision on Thursday, April 10, requiring the Trump administration to facilitate Abrego Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador, but asking the district court to clarify what it meant by effectuate that release, noting that it must give due regard for the deference owed to the executive branch in the conduct of foreign affairs. The Supreme Court also ordered that the government should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps. Judge Chinise ordered the government to file an update by 9:30am on April 11 explaining where Abrego Garcia is, what the government is doing to get him back, and what more it will do. She planned an in person hearing at 1pm but the administration evidently does not intend to comply. On April 11, the lawyer representing the government, Drew Ensign, said he did not have information about where Abrego Garcia is and ignored her order to provide information about what the government was doing to bring him back. Saturday, it said Abrego Garcia is alive and secure in Cecotra. Today, it said it had no new information about him, but said that Abrego Garcia is no longer eligible for the immigration judge's order not to send him to El Salvador because of his membership in MS.13, which is now a designated foreign terrorist organization. There is still no evidence that Abrego Garcia is a member of Ms. 13. Today, administration lawyers use the Supreme Court's warning that the court must give due regard for the deference owed to the executive branch in the conduct of foreign affairs. To lay out a chilling argument, they ignored the Supreme Court's agreement that the government must get Abrego Garcia out of El Salvador, as well as the court's requirement that the administration explain what it's doing to make that happen. Instead, the lawyers argued that because Abrego Garcia is now outside the country, any attempt to get him back would intrude on the president's power to conduct foreign affairs. Similarly, they argue that the president cannot be ordered to do anything but remove domestic obstacles from Abrego Garcia's return because Nayib Bukele, the president of El Salvador, is currently in the US For a visit with Trump. They suggest they will not share any more updates about Abrego Garcia, and the court should not ask for them because it would intrude on sensitive foreign policy issues. Let's be very clear about exactly what's happening here. President Donald J. Trump is claiming the power to ignore the due process of the law guaranteed by the U.S. constitution, declare someone is a criminal, kidnap them, send them to prison in a third country, and then claim that there is no way to get that person back. All people in the United States are entitled to due process, but Trump and his officers have tried to convince Americans that non citizens are not. They have also pushed the idea that those they are offshoring are criminals. But a Bloomberg investigation showed that of the 238 men sent to Seekot in the first group, only five of them had been charged with or convicted of felony assault or gun violations. Three had been charged with misdemeanors like petty theft. Two were charged with human smuggling. In any case, in the US Criminals are entitled to due process. Make no mistake, as Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson recently warned. If the administration can take non citizens off the streets, render them to prison in another country, and then claim it is helpless to correct the error because the person is out of reach of US Jurisdiction, it could do the same thing to citizens. Trump has said he would love to do exactly that and would even be honored to. And Bukele has been offering to hold US Citizens Dasha Burns and Maya Ward of Politico reported Friday that former Blackwater CEO Erik Prince is pitching a plan to expand renditions to El Salvador to at least 100,000 criminal offenders from US prisons and to avoid legal challenges by making part of seacot American territory and then leasing it back to El Salvador to run When White House press secretary Carolyn Levitt says the president's idea for American citizens to be potentially deported these would be heinous, violent criminals who have broken our nation's laws repeatedly. Remember that just days ago Trump suggested that a former government employee was guilty of treason for writing a book about his time in the first Trump administration that Trump claimed was designed to sow chaos and distrust in the government. Here's the thing. Once you give up the idea that we are all equal before the law and have the right to due process, you have given up the whole game. You have admitted the principle that some people have more rights than others. Once you have replaced the principle of equality before the law with the idea that some people have no rights, you have granted your approval to the idea of an authoritarian government. At that point, all you can do is to hope that the dictator and his henchmen overlook you. At least some people understand this. The president of North America's building trades unions, Sean McGarvey, received a standing ovation when he said to a room full of his fellow union workers, we need to make our voices heard. We're not red, we're not blue. We're the building trades, the backbone of America. You want to build a 5 billion dollar data center? Want more six figure careers with health care, retirement and no college debt? You don't call Elon Musk, you call us. And yeah, that means all of us. All of us, including our brother, International association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers apprentice Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who we demand to be returned to us and his family. Now. Bring him home. Letters from an American was written and read by Heather Cox Richardson. It was produced at Soundscape Productions, Dedham, MA. Recorded with music composed by Michael Moss.
Letters from an American: April 13, 2025 – Detailed Summary
Heather Cox Richardson's "Letters from an American" podcast delves into the intricate interplay between U.S. immigration policies, legal battles, and the broader implications for due process and equality before the law. In the April 13, 2025 episode, Richardson examines the controversial case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, shedding light on administrative overreach and its ramifications.
The episode begins with the troubling account of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a 29-year-old from El Salvador. Garcia fled his home country in 2011 at the age of 16 to escape threats from a violent gang that targeted his family's pupusa business. Settling in Maryland with his U.S. citizen brother, Garcia built a stable life:
Quote:
"Ever since, Abrego Garcia has checked in annually with ICE as directed. He lives with his wife and their three children and has never been charged with any crime." [00:00]
In March 2019, while waiting for work at a Home Depot, Garcia was apprehended by police and handed over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Despite a credible claim that his life was in danger due to gang threats, an immigration judge denied his asylum request but also refused to deport him to El Salvador, acknowledging his credible fear of persecution.
Quote:
"The government has no way to effectuate return because they are no longer the custodian and the court thus lacks jurisdiction." [00:00]
Garcia's family swiftly took legal action against the administration's actions. On March 24, they filed a lawsuit challenging his removal. The case escalated through the courts, leading to significant judicial scrutiny:
District Court Ruling:
April 4: US District Court Judge Paula Chinise ordered Garcia's return to the U.S. by April 7, emphasizing the lack of legal grounds for his detention and removal.
Quote:
"His detention appears wholly lawless. It is a clear constitutional violation." [00:00]
Supreme Court Involvement:
The administration appealed Judge Chinise's decision.
April 10: The Supreme Court, in a 9-0 decision, mandated the Trump administration to facilitate Garcia's release from El Salvador while seeking clarifications regarding the execution of this order.
Quote:
"If the administration can take non citizens off the streets, render them to prison in another country, and then claim it is helpless to correct the error because the person is out of reach of US Jurisdiction, it could do the same thing to citizens." [00:00]
The Trump administration's handling of Garcia's case has been met with widespread criticism, highlighting potential abuses of executive power:
Admission of Error:
Allegations of Gang Affiliation:
Supreme Court's Response:
Quote:
"Once you give up the idea that we are all equal before the law and have the right to due process, you have given up the whole game." [00:00]
Richardson criticizes the administration’s approach as a blatant disregard for constitutional rights, arguing that such actions undermine the foundational principle of equality before the law.
The episode explores the chilling precedent set by Garcia's case, where due process is sidelined for non-citizens, raising alarms about potential future abuses:
Due Process Concerns:
Supreme Court Justices' Warnings:
Quote:
"If you have replaced the principle of equality before the law with the idea that some people have no rights, you have granted your approval to the idea of an authoritarian government." [00:00]
Amidst the legal turmoil, support comes from unexpected quarters, highlighting solidarity within the labor movement:
Sean McGarvey, president of North America's building trades unions, passionately advocates for the return of Garcia, framing the issue as a collective fight for justice and workers' rights.
Quote:
"All of us, including our brother, International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers apprentice Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who we demand to be returned to us and his family." [00:00]
This support underscores the broader societal recognition of the injustices faced by individuals like Garcia and the call for systemic change.
Richardson concludes by emphasizing the fundamental principles at stake, urging listeners to remain vigilant against policies that undermine due process and equality. The episode serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of civil rights and the importance of defending them against executive overreach.
Final Quote:
"Let's be very clear about exactly what's happening here. President Donald J. Trump is claiming the power to ignore the due process of the law guaranteed by the U.S. constitution..." [00:00]
Produced by Soundscape Productions, Dedham, MA, with music composed by Michael Moss, this episode of "Letters from an American" provides a compelling examination of the intersection between immigration policy, legal integrity, and human rights.
Listen to the full episode here.