Loading summary
Heather Cox Richardson
Foreign.
Michael Moss
Hello, this is Michael Moss. Heather Cox Richardson is traveling today and her travel arrangements did not allow her time to read today's letter, so I will be reading it in her place. April 2, 2025 Just five months ago, on October 19, 2024, the Economist ran a special report on America's economy. That economy was, the magazine said, the envy of the world. Today, stock market futures plummeted after President Donald J. Trump announced that he will impose a 10% tariff on all imports to the United States, with higher rates on about 60 countries he claims engage in unfair trade practices, including China, Japan, Vietnam and South Korea, as well as the European Union. Dow Jones Industrial Average futures lost more than 1,000 points upon the news, falling by 2.5%. The S&P 500 dropped 3.6%. Trump's erratic approach to the economy had already rattled markets, which dropped significantly in the first quarter of this year, and consumer confidence, which recently hit a 12 year low. Trump waited until the stock market had closed today before he announced the new tariffs. Then, in a speech in the White House Rose Garden, he said, for decades our country has been looted, pillaged, raped and plundered by nations near and far, both friend and foe alike. But it is not going to happen anymore. Instead, he said tariffs would create the Golden Age of America. Never before has an hour of presidential rhetoric cost so many people so much. Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers posted. The best estimate of the loss from tariff policy is now close to $30 trillion, or $300,000 per family of four. The Trump tariff tax is the largest peacetime tax hike in U.S. history. Posted former Vice President Mike Pence. Trump claims he is imposing reciprocal tariffs and said they are about half of what other countries levy on U.S. goods. In fact, the numbers he is using for his claim that other countries are imposing high tariffs on U.S. goods are are bonkers. Economist Paul Krugman points out that the European places tariffs of less than 3% on average on U.S. goods, while Trump maintained its tariffs are 39%. Krugman said he had no idea where that number had come from, but financial journalist James Surowiecki figured out that the White House just took our trade deficit with each country and divided it by the country's exports to US. He called it extraordinary nonsense. Washington Post economic writer Katherine Rampel posted that she was reluctant to amplify Surowiecki's theory that the tariff rates were based on such a dumb calculation. But then the Office of the U.S. trade Representative confirmed it. Certain observers in business had apparently persuaded themselves that Trump didn't really intend to raise tariffs very much and that his many vows to do so were simply rhetoric. Since economists agree that tariffs are a tax on consumers and will raise inflation and slow down growth. Today's tariffs are higher than expected and business leaders are alarmed. J.P. morgan tonight said that they view the full implementation of these policies as a substantial macroeconomic shock not currently incorporated in our forecasts, and that these policies, if sustained, would likely push the U.S. and global economy into recession this year. Economist Brad Setzer of the Council on Foreign Relations agreed. He told David J. Lynch and Jeff Stein of the Washington Post, in the short run, the effect is probably a recession. It's going to raise the price of so many goods that can't be made in the United States. In the long run. It's a vision of the US that is very isolated from the world but not from every other country. While Trump imposed tariffs on Australia's remote Heard and McDonald Islands, which are uninhabited except by wildlife like seals and penguins, it did not put tariffs on Russia. A different financial shift lifted sanctions against senior Russian negotiator Kirill Dmitriev to permit him to travel to Washington, D.C. today to meet with U.S. special Envoy Steve Witkoff for what Alex Markhardt, Jennifer Hansler and Elena Treen of CNN refer to as talks on strengthening relations between the two countries and as they seek to end the war in Ukraine. Senator Chris Murphy, a Democrat of Connecticut, noted tonight that the tariffs make no economic sense because they aren't designed as economic policy. The tariffs are simply a new super dangerous political tool, Murphy suggests. They are a way to make private industry dependent on the president, the same way he has tried to make law firms and universities dependent on on him. Industries and companies will need to pledge loyalty to Trump in order to get sanctions relief. Murphy warns that the tariffs are designed to create economic hardship so that Trump has a straight face rationale for releasing them business by business or industry by industry as he adjusts or grants relief. It's a win win. The economy improves and dissent disappears. There is also Trump's apparent fascination with President William McKinley, who held office from 1897 to 1901 at a time when high tariffs concentrated wealth in the hands of industrialists, while workers and farmers as well as their families faced injury, hunger and homelessness from dangerous working conditions, low wages and commodity prices, and seasonal factory closings. Trump has frequently claimed those years were the nation's wealthiest, and today he helped explain his focus on that era when he referred to the 1913 Revenue Act, a law that has angered the right wing for decades. That act began the process of replacing the high tariffs of the late 19th and early 20th centuries with an income tax, thus shifting the burden of funding the treasury from ordinary Americans through tariffs to wealthier Americans through the income tax. At least some of Trump's tariff plans seem tied to his enthusiasm for tax cuts on wealthy individuals and corporations. But in trying to re establish the financial patterns of the late 19th century, patterns that led to profound economic instability in the United States, including economic crashes Trump is undermining the system of global trade that has fostered international cooperation since World War II, CNN global economic analyst Rana Foroohar told CNN's John Vous. This is Trump saying I am going to overturn globalization as we've known it. She added, I'm hoping it doesn't push the US and the world into recession. Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo makes the important point that presidents have no inherent power over tariffs whatsoever. The Constitution gives to Congress, not the president, the power to impose tariffs. But the International Emergency Economic Powers act allows the president to impose tariffs if he declares a national emergency under the National Emergencies act, which Trump did today, declaring a national emergency to increase our competitive edge, protect our sovereignty and strengthen our national and economic security. That same law allows Congress to end such a declaration of emergency, but so far Republicans have declined to do so. Today the Senate rebuked Trump by passing a resolution to block his tariffs on Canadian products. With four Republicans Susan Collins of Maine, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Rand Paul, also of Kentucky, joining Democrats to pass the resolution, House Speaker Mike Johnson is unlikely to take the measure up. Letters from an American was written by Heather Cox Richardson. It was produced at Soundscape Productions, Dedham, MA. Recorded with music composed by Michael Moss.
Podcast Summary: Letters from an American - April 2, 2025
Introduction In the April 2, 2025 episode of Letters from an American, Heather Cox Richardson's timely analysis delves into the seismic shifts in U.S. economic policy initiated by President Donald Trump's recent declaration of unprecedented tariffs. Although Heather was traveling and unable to present the episode herself, Michael Moss skillfully delivered her insights, maintaining the podcast's commitment to unraveling the historical contexts behind today's politics.
Trump’s Tariff Announcement and Market Reaction At the core of this episode is President Donald Trump's abrupt announcement to impose a 10% tariff on all U.S. imports, with elevated rates targeting approximately 60 countries perceived to engage in unfair trade practices, including economic powerhouses like China, Japan, Vietnam, South Korea, and the European Union. This decision sent shockwaves through financial markets:
Market Plunge: The Dow Jones Industrial Average futures tumbled by 2.5%, equating to a loss of over 1,000 points, while the S&P 500 experienced a 3.6% drop (00:45).
Economic Uncertainty: Trump's unpredictable economic maneuvers had already unsettled markets earlier in the year, contributing to a 12-year low in consumer confidence (01:10).
In his White House Rose Garden address, Trump framed the tariffs as a corrective measure against decades of international exploitation. He proclaimed, “tariffs would create the Golden Age of America” (02:15). However, this rhetoric has sparked significant debate among economists and political figures.
Reactions from Economists and Officials Prominent voices in economics and politics have weighed in on Trump's tariff strategy:
Lawrence Summers, former Treasury Secretary, warned that the tariff policy could result in losses nearing $30 trillion, or about $300,000 per family of four (03:05).
Mike Pence, former Vice President, attempted to justify the tariffs as reciprocal measures, claiming they were merely half of what other nations impose on U.S. goods (03:35).
Paul Krugman, Nobel laureate economist, criticized Trump's figures, noting that the European Union's average tariffs on U.S. goods are below 3%, starkly contrasting Trump's assertion of a 39% average (04:10). Krugman highlighted the absurdity of these numbers, a sentiment echoed by journalist James Surowiecki, who uncovered that the White House's calculations were based on an erroneous formula dividing the trade deficit by exports (04:45).
Katherine Rampel of the Washington Post expressed skepticism about Surowiecki's findings but acknowledged their confirmation by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, labeling Trump's tariff numbers as "extraordinary nonsense" (05:20).
Business Community Response The immediate business community has reacted with palpable alarm:
J.P. Morgan described the full implementation of Trump's tariff policies as a "substantial macroeconomic shock" not yet reflected in economic forecasts, potentially pushing the U.S. and global economy into a recession within the year (06:00).
Brad Setzer from the Council on Foreign Relations echoed these concerns, predicting a short-term recession and a long-term isolation of the U.S. from global trade networks (06:35).
Political Implications and Strategies The tariff imposition extends beyond economics into the political arena:
Historical Context and Parallels Trump's tariff policies appear influenced by historical precedents:
He has frequently referenced President William McKinley, who served from 1897 to 1901, a period marked by high tariffs that benefited industrialists but adversely affected workers and farmers through low wages and unstable economic conditions (08:00).
Trump highlighted the 1913 Revenue Act, which shifted the tax burden from tariffs to income taxes, aligning with his emphasis on tax cuts for wealthy individuals and corporations. This historical nod suggests an intent to reinstate late 19th-century financial patterns, potentially leading to economic instability reminiscent of that era (08:45).
Global Trade and Globalization Impact The episode also addresses the broader implications for globalization:
Constitutional and Legislative Responses Legal experts and legislative bodies are scrutinizing the president's actions:
Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo highlights a crucial constitutional debate: presidents do not possess inherent power over tariffs; this authority rests with Congress. Trump's reliance on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act allows him to impose tariffs by declaring a national emergency, but such declarations can be revoked by Congress, though Republicans have thus far declined to challenge (10:00).
The Senate took a stand by passing a resolution to block tariffs on Canadian products, with four Republican senators joining Democrats in the endeavor. Nevertheless, House Speaker Mike Johnson is unlikely to advance this measure, limiting its immediate effectiveness (10:40).
Conclusion Heather Cox Richardson's Letters from an American provides a comprehensive and critical examination of President Trump's recent tariff announcement, situating it within historical, economic, and political frameworks. The episode underscores the profound uncertainty and potential instability introduced by these policy shifts, highlighting widespread concern among economists, business leaders, and political figures about the direction in which the U.S. is headed. As the nation grapples with these changes, the episode serves as a vital resource for understanding the complex interplay between historical precedents and contemporary policy decisions shaping America's economic landscape.
Notable Quotes
President Donald Trump (02:15): “Tariffs would create the Golden Age of America.”
Lawrence Summers (03:05): “The best estimate of the loss from tariff policy is now close to $30 trillion, or $300,000 per family of four.”
Paul Krugman (04:10): “I had no idea where that number [39%] had come from, but financial journalist James Surowiecki figured out that the White House just took our trade deficit with each country and divided it by the country's exports to US. He called it extraordinary nonsense.”
Senator Chris Murphy (07:10): “The tariffs are simply a new super dangerous political tool, Murphy suggests. They are a way to make private industry dependent on the president.”
Rana Foroohar (09:20): “This is Trump saying I am going to overturn globalization as we've known it. I'm hoping it doesn't push the US and the world into recession.”
Production Credits Letters from an American was authored by Heather Cox Richardson and produced by Soundscape Productions in Dedham, MA. The episode featured music composed by Michael Moss, who also provided the narration in Heather’s absence.