Loading summary
Heather Cox Richardson
Foreign 2025 major indexes on the stock market began down more than 3% today when, as Allison Morrow of CNN reported, a rumor that Trump was considering delaying his tariffs by three months sent stocks surging upward by almost 8%. The rumor was unfounded. It appeared to begin from a small account on X, but it indicated how desperate traders are to see an end to President Donald J. Trump's trade war. As soon as the rumor was discredited, the market began to fall again. Although Treasury Secretary Scott Besant's announcement that he is opening trade negotiations with Japan and looking forward to talks with other countries appeared to reassure some traders that Trump's tariffs will not last. The wild swings made the day one of the most volatile in stock market history. It ended with the Dow Jones Industrial average down by 349 points and the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ composite staying relatively flat. Futures for tomorrow are up slightly. Foreign markets fared badly today, suggesting that the reality of Trump's tariffs is beginning to sink in. Sam Goldfarb of the Wall Street Journal notes that Hong Kong's Hang Seng took its biggest dive since the 1997 Asian financial crisis, losing 13%, and that other markets also fell today. Goldfarb reports that in the US Traders are deeply worried about losses but also anxious about missing a rebound if the administration changes its policies. Hence the extreme volatility of the market. Generally, values over 30 are considered indicators of increased risk and uncertainty. In the Chicago Board Options Exchange, or CBOE Volatility Index, the so called fear gauge. Today it spiked to 60. Business leaders are speaking out publicly against Trump's tariffs today. Ken Langone, the co founder of Home Depot and a major Republican donor, told the Financial Times, I don't understand the goddamn formula. Senate Republicans are also starting to push back. Seven Republican senators have now signed onto a bill that would limit Trump's ability to impose tariffs. The power to levy tariffs belongs to Congress, but Congress has permitted a president to adjust tariffs on an emergency basis. Trump declared an emergency, and it is on that ground that he has upended more than 90 years of global economic policy. Trump has threatened to veto any such legislation, but he will not need to if Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a Republican of South Dakota, and House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican of Louisiana, refused to bring the measure to a vote. Jordaine Carney and Meredith Lee Hill of Politico report that while Republicans express concern about the tariffs in private, leaders will stand with the president because they must have the votes of MAGA lawmakers to pass any of their legislative agenda through Congress. And to get that, they will need Trump's support. Others are worried about incurring Trump's wrath and with it a primary challenger. People are skittish. They're all worried about it, senator Rand Paul, a Republican of Kentucky, told Carney and Hill. But they are putting on a stiff upper lip to act as though nothing is happening and hoping it goes away. But so far, it does not look as if it's going to go away. Today, the European Commission has announced 25% counterterroriffs in retaliation for Trump's tariffs. Trump's response to the crisis has been to double down on his tariff plan. This morning, he wrote on his social media network that he will impose additional 50% tariffs on China, effective on Wednesday, unless it drops the retaliatory tariffs it has placed on US Products. Rather than backing down, China said it would fight to the end. Today, in a press conference convened in the Oval Office, Trump explained his thinking behind why he has begun a global tariff war. You know, our country was the strongest, believe it or not, from from 1870 to 1913. You know why? It was all tariff based. We had no income tax, he said. Then in 1913, some genius came up with the idea of let's charge the people of our country, not foreign countries that are ripping off our country. And the country was never relatively, was never that kind of wealth. We had so much wealth, we didn't know what to do with our money. We had meetings, we had committees, and these committees worked tirelessly to study one subject. We have so much money. What are we going to do with it? Who are we going to give it to? And I hope we're going to be in that position again. Aside from this complete misreading of American history, Civil War income taxes lasted until 1875, for example. Tariffs are paid by consumers. The panics of 1873 and 1893 devastated the economy. Few Americans at the time thought the Gilded Age Age was a golden age, and I have no clue what he's referring to with the talk about committees. Trump's larger motivation is clear. He wants to get rid of income taxes. Congress passed the 1913 Revenue act imposing income taxes to shift the cost of supporting the government from ordinary Americans, especially the women, who by then made up a significant portion of household consumers, to men of wealth. Tariffs were regressive because they fell disproportionately on working class Americans through their everyday purchases. Income taxes spread costs more evenly, according to a man's ability to pay the switch from tariffs to income taxes helped to break the power of the so called robber barons, the powerful industrialists who controlled the US economy and government in the late 19th century. To get rid of income taxes, Trump and his Republicans have backed the decimation of the government services that support ordinary Americans. Today in the Oval Office press conference, Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested where they intend to put government money, promising a defense budget of $1 trillion, a significant jump from the current 892 billion defense budget. We have to be strong because you've got a lot of bad forces out there now, Trump said. Alison McCann, Alexander Berzon and Hamed Aliaziz of the New York Times reported today that the administration also intends to spend as much as $45 billion over the next two years on new detention facilities for immigrants. In the last fiscal year, the total amount of federal money allocated to the Immigration and Customs enforcement was about $3.4 billion. The new facilities will be in private hands and will operate with lower standards and less oversight than current detention facilities.
Michael Moss
Letters from an American was written and read by Heather Cox Richardson. It was produced at Soundscape Productions, Dedham, MA. Recorded with music composed by Michael Moss.
Letters from an American: April 7, 2025 Episode Summary
Hosted by Heather Cox Richardson
At the episode's onset, Heather Cox Richardson discusses the extreme volatility in the U.S. stock market on April 7, 2025. Major indexes plunged over 3%, triggered by a false rumor that former President Donald J. Trump was considering delaying his tariffs by three months. This misinformation, originating from a minor account on X (formerly Twitter), briefly sent stocks soaring by almost 8% before the market corrected itself as the rumor was debunked.
Notable Quote:
"It appeared to begin from a small account on X, but it indicated how desperate traders are to see an end to President Donald J. Trump's trade war." – Heather Cox Richardson [00:30]
Despite initial relief from Treasury Secretary Scott Besant’s announcement about initiating trade negotiations with Japan and other nations, the day ended tumultuously. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 349 points, while the S&P 500 and NASDAQ Composite remained relatively flat. Futures for the following day showed a slight uptick.
Foreign Market Impact: Richardson highlights that international markets reacted negatively, with Hong Kong's Hang Seng experiencing its most significant decline since the 1997 Asian financial crisis, dropping by 13%. This downturn reflects growing global unease about the sustainability of Trump's tariffs.
Market Sentiment: Sam Goldfarb from The Wall Street Journal is cited, noting that U.S. traders are caught between fear of losses and anxiety over missing potential rebounds should the administration amend its policies. This sentiment is encapsulated by the Chicago Board Options Exchange’s Volatility Index (VIX) spiking to 60, a level that signals heightened risk and uncertainty.
The episode delves into the increasing public and political resistance against Trump's tariff strategies. Business leaders and Republican senators alike are voicing their concerns.
Business Leaders’ Critique: Ken Langone, the co-founder of Home Depot and a prominent Republican donor, expressed his frustration to the Financial Times:
"I don't understand the goddamn formula." – Ken Langone [03:15]
Republican Senate Pushback: Seven Republican senators have endorsed a bill aimed at restricting Trump's authority to impose tariffs. While the Constitution grants tariff-levying powers to Congress, the current framework allows the president to adjust tariffs during emergencies—a provision Trump has exploited, disrupting over 90 years of global economic policy.
Internal Party Tensions: Jordaine Carney and Meredith Lee Hill from Politico report that, despite private concerns among Republicans about the tariffs, party leaders are likely to support Trump publicly. This allegiance is driven by the necessity of securing votes from MAGA lawmakers to advance any legislative agenda. Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson are anticipated to block the tariff-limit bill from reaching a vote, potentially rendering Trump's threat of a veto moot.
Senator Rand Paul’s Perspective: Expressing the cautious stance within the party, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky told Carney and Hill:
"People are skittish. They're all worried about it." – Senator Rand Paul [05:20]
However, he noted that many senators are maintaining a facade of composure, hoping the issue resolves itself—a sentiment that, so far, remains unfulfilled.
Richardson outlines the recent intensification of the global tariff conflict initiated by Trump.
European Retaliation: The European Commission has responded to Trump's tariffs with a 25% countertariff, marking a significant escalation in trade tensions.
China’s Response: In retaliation, Trump has announced a substantial increase in tariffs:
"I will impose additional 50% tariffs on China, effective on Wednesday, unless it drops the retaliatory tariffs it has placed on US products." – Donald J. Trump [06:10]
China has firmly stated its intention to "fight to the end," refusing to back down from its stance.
In a press conference held in the Oval Office, Trump defended his tariff policies by referencing historical economic strategies.
Trump’s Argument: He claimed that from 1870 to 1913, the U.S. was the strongest nation "because it was all tariff based" and criticized the introduction of income taxes in 1913 as a detrimental shift.
Historical Inaccuracies Highlighted: Richardson points out several historical inaccuracies in Trump’s narrative:
Economic Implications: Trump's push to eliminate income taxes aims to revert to a tariff-based system, which historically was regressive and placed a heavier burden on the working class. This move undermines the fair distribution of tax burdens and aims to dismantle government services that support ordinary Americans.
The episode concludes with an analysis of the administration's plans to reallocate government funds amid the tariff war.
Defense Budget Increase: Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced plans to boost the defense budget to $1 trillion, up from the current $892 billion. This increase is justified by the need to counter emerging global threats.
Immigration Detention Facilities: According to Alison McCann, Alexander Berzon, and Hamed Aliaziz of The New York Times, the administration intends to invest up to $45 billion over the next two years in constructing new detention facilities for immigrants. These facilities will be privately operated with lower standards and reduced oversight compared to existing ones, marking a significant shift in immigration policy and spending priorities.
Heather Cox Richardson's episode of Letters from an American provides a comprehensive analysis of the tumultuous economic and political landscape shaped by Trump's tariff policies. From unprecedented stock market volatility and rising intra-party tensions to escalating global trade wars and shifts in government spending, the episode underscores the profound and multifaceted impacts of Trump's administration on both domestic and international fronts.
Produced by Soundscape Productions, Dedham, MA. Music composed by Michael Moss.