Loading summary
Commentator
Foreign December 17, 2024 Yesterday, Trump gave his first press conference since the election. It was exactly what Trump's public performances always are attention grabbing threats alongside lies and very little apparent understanding of actual issues. His mix of outrageous and threatening is central to his politics, though. It's it keeps him central to the media, even though, as Josh Marshall pointed out in Talking points memo on December 13, he often claims a right to do something he knows very little about and has no power to accomplish. The uncertainty he creates is key to his power, Marshall notes. It keeps everyone off balance and focused on him in anticipation of trouble to come. At the same time, it seems increasingly clear that the wealthy leaders who backed Trump's reelection are not terribly concerned about his threats. They seem to see him as a figurehead rather than a policy leader. They're counting on him to deliver more tax cuts and deregulation, but apparently are dismissing his campaign vows to raise tariffs and deport immigrants as mere rhetoric. As the promised tax cuts are already under discussion, interested parties are turning to deregulation. Suzanne Rust and Ian James of the Los Angeles Times reported on Sunday that on December 5th more than 100 industrial trade groups signed at 21 page letter to Trump complaining that regulations are strangling our economy. They urged him to gut Biden era regulations and instead to partner with manufacturers to create workable regulations that achieve important policy goals without imposing overly burdensome and impractical requirements on our sector. They single out reductions in air quality, water quality, chemical, vehicle and power plant environmental regulations as important for their industries. They also call for ending the regulatory overreach of the Biden Administration on labor rules, saying those rules threaten the employer employee relationship and harm manufacturers global competitiveness. They want an end to right to repair laws, a loosening of the rules for how and when companies need to report cyber incidents, and the replacement of mandated consumer product safety rules with voluntary standards. They also call for cuts to the Biden Administration's antitrust efforts and for looser corporate finance regulations. On December 12, Gina he reported in the Wall Street Journal that Trump's advisors are exploring ways to dramatically shrink, consolidate or or even eliminate the top bank watchdogs in Washington, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or fdic. As Katherine Rampel explained in the Washington Post today, Congress created the FDIC in 1933 to protect bank deposits so that a bank's customers can trust that mismanaged banks won't lose their money. The FDIC also oversees those banks so that they are less likely to get into trouble in the first place. Congress created the system after people rushing to get their money out before a collapse actually created the very collapse that they feared, with one bank failure creating another in a domino effect that dug the economy even further into the crisis it was in after the Great Crash. But the insurance money for those banks comes from fees assessed on the banks themselves, so abolishing the FD would save the banks money. When he learned that Trump's advisors are eyeing cuts to the fdic, Princeton history professor Kevin Cruz commented, when I lecture about New Deal banking reforms, I note that some of the key measures like Glass Steagall were repealed by the right with disastrous results like the 2008 financial meltdown. But ha ha, no one will ever be stupid enough to kill FDIC and bring back the old bank runs. Ben Guggenheim of Politico was the first to report that 29 Republican members of Congress are also quick off the blocks in getting into the act of promoting private industry, calling for the incoming president to end the program of the Internal Revenue Service that lets people file their taxes directly without using a private tax preparer. Other developed countries use a similar system, but in the US Private tax preparers staunchly oppose the public system. When more than 140,000 people use the IRS pilot program this year, they saved an estimated $6.5 million. Republicans called for its end, warning it is a threat to taxpayers freedom from government overreach. But for all their faith that Trump will deregulate the economy, economic leaders seem to think his other promises were just rhetoric. Ben Schwartz of the Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that business executives have been lobbying Trump to change his declared plans on tariffs. The President elect has vowed to place tariffs of 25% on products from Canada and Mexico and of an additional 10% on products from China. He claims to believe that other countries will pay these tariffs, but in fact US Consumers will pay them. That, plus the fact that other countries will almost certainly respond with their own tariffs against US Products makes economists warn that Trump's plans will hurt the economy with both inflation and trade wars. Schwartz reported that some companies and some Republicans are hoping that Trump's tariff threats are simply a bargaining tactic. Trump supporters say something similar about his vow to deport 11 to 20 million undocumented immigrants, hoping he won't actually go after long term, hard working undocumented people. On December 10, Jack Dolan reported in the Los Angeles Times that the resort town of Mammoth Lakes, California depends on migrant labor. And on December 15, Eli Saslow and Aaron Schaff of the New York Times reported the story of an undocumented worker brought to the US as an infant who is now trying to figure out his future after his beloved father in law voted for Trump two days ago, CNN reported on Trump supporting dairy farmers in South Dakota who depend on undocumented workers, insisting that Trump will not round up undocumented immigrants no matter what he says. One person who is not discounting Trump's threats is Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican of Kentucky. McConnell will give up his leadership position in January and has told his colleagues he feels liberated. McConnell appears to be taking a stand against Trump's expected appointee for secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Kennedy speaks often against vaccines, and after the New York Times reported that the lawyer working with Kennedy to vet his potential HHS staff petitioned federal regulators to take the polio vaccine off the market, McConnell, a polio survivor, warned efforts to undermine the public confidence in proven cures are not just uninformed, they're dangerous. Anyone seeking the Senate's consent to serve in the incoming administration would do well to steer clear of even the appearance of association with such efforts. McConnell has also been vocal about his opposition to Trump's isolationism. He is a champion of sending military support to Ukraine and after he steps down from the leadership, will chair the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, the subcommittee that controls military spending. America's national security interests face the gravest array of threats since the Second World War, McConnell says. At this crucial moment, a new Senate Republican majority has a responsibility to secure the future of US leadership and primacy. McConnell will also chair the Rules Committee, which gives him a chance to stop MAGA senators from trying to abandon the power of the Senate and permit Trump to get his way. McConnell has said that defending the Senate as an institution and protecting the right to political speech in our elections remain among my longest standing priorities. That last sentence identifies the current struggle in the Republican Party. McConnell is showing his willingness to prevent Trump and MAGA Republicans from bulldozing their way through the Senate in order to undermine the Departments of Justice, Defense and Health and Human Services, among others. But when he talks about protecting the right to political speech in our elections, he's talking about protecting The Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United decision that permits corporations and wealthy individuals to flood our elections and thus our political system with money. It is those corporations and wealthy individuals who are now lining up for tax cuts and deregulation, but who don't want the tariffs or mass deportations or isolationism. Trump's America First MAGA base wants. Trump and his team have been talking about their election win as a mandate and a landslide, but it was actually a razor thin victory. With more voters choosing someone other than Trump than voting for him. He will need the support of establishment Republicans in the Senate to put his MAGA policies in place. At yesterday's press conference, he appeared to be nodding to McConnell when he promised, you're not going to lose the polio vaccine. That's not going to happen. McConnell's fierce use of power in the past suggests that the Senate's giving up its constitutional power to bend to Trump's will isn't likely to happen either.
Production Credits
Letters from an American was produced at Soundscape Productions, Dedham, MA. Recorded with music composed by Michael Moss.
Letters from an American: December 17, 2024 – In-Depth Summary
Heather Cox Richardson's "Letters from an American" delves into the intricate dynamics of post-election politics, focusing on former President Donald Trump's first press conference since the election and the broader implications for the Republican Party and American governance. This summary captures the episode's key discussions, insights, and conclusions.
The episode opens with an analysis of Donald Trump's first press conference following the recent election. Characterized by Richardson as a blend of "attention-grabbing threats alongside lies and very little apparent understanding of actual issues" (00:00), Trump's approach remains consistent with his previous public appearances. This strategy, described as a mix of the "outrageous and threatening," serves to keep him at the center of media attention despite questions about his grasp on substantive policy matters.
Richardson highlights that Trump's political maneuvering relies heavily on the uncertainty he cultivates. Referencing Josh Marshall from Talking Points Memo, she notes, “The uncertainty he creates is key to his power, Marshall notes. It keeps everyone off balance and focused on him in anticipation of trouble to come” (00:00). This tactic ensures that Trump's influence remains potent, keeping both the public and political figures in a state of anticipation and vigilance regarding his next moves.
Despite Trump's aggressive rhetoric, there is a notable disconnect between his promises and the priorities of the wealthy leaders who supported his reelection. These leaders view Trump more as a figurehead focused on tax cuts and deregulation rather than a policy-driven leader committed to his campaign promises of raising tariffs and deporting immigrants. Richardson observes that while tax cuts are actively under discussion, other promises appear to be dismissed as mere rhetoric by key stakeholders.
The episode details substantial efforts by industrial trade groups to influence deregulation under Trump's administration. Suzanne Rust and Ian James from the Los Angeles Times report that over 100 industrial trade groups signed a 21-page letter on December 5th, urging Trump to "gut Biden era regulations" (00:00). They advocate for partnering with manufacturers to establish "workable regulations that achieve important policy goals without imposing overly burdensome and impractical requirements." Key areas targeted for deregulation include:
In a significant move, Gina He from the Wall Street Journal reports on December 12th that Trump's advisors are contemplating drastic reductions or eliminations of major financial watchdogs, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (00:00). Katherine Rampel of the Washington Post provides historical context, reminding listeners that the FDIC was established in 1933 to prevent bank runs and economic collapses—a lesson from the Great Crash where the panic-induced bank failures deepened the economic crisis.
Princeton history professor Kevin Cruz critiques the proposal to dismantle the FDIC, likening it to past deregulations that led to the 2008 financial meltdown. He asserts, “No one will ever be stupid enough to kill FDIC and bring back the old bank runs” (00:00), emphasizing the critical role of the FDIC in maintaining financial stability.
Ben Guggenheim of Politico reports that 29 Republican members of Congress are advocating for the termination of the IRS's program allowing taxpayers to file directly without using private tax preparers (00:00). This movement faces strong opposition from private tax preparers who view the public system as a threat to their business. Despite the program enabling over 140,000 people to save approximately $6.5 million this year, Republicans argue it represents "government overreach" and threatens taxpayer freedom.
Contrary to Trump's campaign promises, business leaders are actively lobbying to moderate his stance on tariffs and immigration. Ben Schwartz from the Wall Street Journal notes that "business executives have been lobbying Trump to change his declared plans on tariffs" (00:00). Trump's proposed tariffs—a 25% tax on products from Canada and Mexico and an additional 10% on Chinese goods—are criticized for potentially burdening U.S. consumers and provoking retaliatory tariffs from other nations, which economists warn could lead to inflation and trade wars.
Similarly, Trump's vows to deport 11 to 20 million undocumented immigrants are being challenged. Stories highlighted by the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times illustrate the dependence of certain industries, such as Dairy farming in South Dakota and the resort economy in Mammoth Lakes, California, on migrant labor. These sectors argue that mass deportations would be detrimental to their operations and economic stability. Additionally, personal narratives, such as that of an undocumented worker raised in the U.S., underscore the human impact of potential immigration policies.
A significant portion of the episode focuses on Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's stance against certain Trump policies. McConnell, a Republican from Kentucky, has announced his intention to relinquish his leadership position in January, expressing a sense of liberation (00:00). His opposition is particularly directed towards:
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Potential HHS Appointment: Kennedy, a vocal critic of vaccines, is slated to be Trump's appointee for the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). McConnell, a polio survivor, warns against efforts to undermine public confidence in vaccines, labeling them as “dangerous” (00:00).
Isolationist Policies and National Security: McConnell opposes Trump's isolationism and champions continued military support to Ukraine. As the incoming Senate Republican majority takes shape, McConnell emphasizes the importance of securing U.S. leadership and national security interests, which he describes as facing "the gravest array of threats since the Second World War."
Preservation of the Senate’s Institutional Power: As the chair of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense and the Rules Committee, McConnell aims to prevent MAGA senators from undermining Senate powers and institutional integrity. He underscores the importance of defending the Senate as an institution and protecting the right to political speech in elections, which ties back to supporting decisions like the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling.
Richardson articulates the current tension within the Republican Party, juxtaposing Trump's MAGA base with the party's establishment figures like McConnell. While Trump's policies resonate with a segment of the electorate seeking "America First" agendas, the party's wealthy and industrial leaders prioritize deregulation and tax cuts over Trump's more populist and protectionist pledges.
The narrow margin of Trump's election victory, described as a "razor thin victory," indicates a divided electorate and suggests that establishing policies will require significant support from establishment Republicans. The episode concludes with an assessment of Trump's reliance on traditional Republican power structures to implement his MAGA-driven agenda, despite internal resistance from key figures like McConnell.
At the recent press conference, Trump's assurance that "you're not going to lose the polio vaccine" (00:00) subtly concedes to McConnell’s position on maintaining essential public health measures, hinting at a possible tacit acknowledgment of the Senate's authority over certain appointments and policies.
The December 17, 2024 episode of "Letters from an American" offers a comprehensive analysis of the post-election political landscape, highlighting the nuanced interplay between Trump's rhetoric and the pragmatic approaches of Republican leaders and industrial stakeholders. Heather Cox Richardson underscores the complexities within the Republican Party as it navigates deregulation, taxation, immigration, and national security, all while managing the enduring influence of Trump's populist strategies.
Commentator: “The uncertainty he creates is key to his power, Marshall notes. It keeps everyone off balance and focused on him in anticipation of trouble to come.” (00:00)
Princeton History Professor Kevin Cruz: “No one will ever be stupid enough to kill FDIC and bring back the old bank runs.” (00:00)
Mitch McConnell: “Defending the Senate as an institution and protecting the right to political speech in our elections remain among my longest standing priorities.” (00:00)
Trump: “You're not going to lose the polio vaccine.” (00:00)
Produced by Soundscape Productions, Dedham, MA. Music composed by Michael Moss.