B (3:23)

Click Rumble Premium and join now for 99 annually or $9.99 a month to get the entirely ad free experience and an expanding roster of content creators and free speech. Hey YouTube, what you're about to watch is a new segment we call Change My mind. Open campus.

D (3:40)

A college campus.

B (3:41)

Sure. It's an open campus. Yeah. You can do whatever you want. You can protest any professor. You pick any professor.

E (3:48)

Yeah.

B (3:49)

And you know or set up a dialogue how you think it would be best or most fair. Forgive me or your source.

F (3:54)

What do you usually read?

B (3:55)

Cnn, cnn, Twitter. Cnn, Twitter and a lot of professors probably here. I think your somewhat parroting from what you've learned from your professors. And so I don't think.

E (4:07)

Well, I mean I agree with you

B (4:09)

that data from CNN and Twitter and professors is wrong. Liberal professors and students who've seen it, they start yelling. Whose statistics are you reading? The statistics of According to the FBI, women and 12% of men are raped on college campuses. Incorrect. We don't have any professors willing to debate. If you know professors here be willing to. We would be more than happy.

G (4:30)

I'd be honest.

D (4:30)

Honestly, no, I don't.

B (4:34)

You've been failed as students. You've been failed. It's time to go straight to the top to the people who failed you. When we started change my mind, the idea was back in 2016, the more I went on campus, the more I saw the failures of the institutions. And I want to be really clear about something. This was never designed to mock, denigrate or dunk on students who don't know any better. It was always designed to highlight the failures of the institutions. We're actually going to be starting Formal debates with professors at schools. Or we can have a civil dialogue and maybe get to the root cause as to why you've been failed as students. Free speech and why you should give a damn. Jonathan Zimmerman. Why should we give a damn? Well, we should give a damn because

H (5:24)

free speech has been at the heart

B (5:26)

of every movement for change in this country. Racial and gender and sexual contemporary perspectives. Sex education. I discovered it was precisely the opposite. That's right. You can get your tickets for the chain of mind Professor Debates, April 10th at Upennial. And my chest still hurts. I ripped out. Just so you know. You don't know about. I ripped out a clump of my chest hair. Why? My watch band. You guys ever have a watch band that traps your hair that pinches Tool man. You know, and I was just scratching. And the worst part is I could feel it trap it. But I had no choice. You just gotta pull. It's like wearing my old Velcro light up shoes. Look. Nothing. All right. How excited are you? I forgot. How excited are you to be back to the moon? How do you guys. Right? That's pretty cool.

E (7:00)

I mean, we're not going to.

B (7:02)

I mean, you know, we're going.

E (7:03)

Kind of disappointing. It's. It's.

B (7:04)

No, it's not. It's part of the process. All right. Thanks for being negative. You. You walked in like four seconds ago. Captain Morgan, CEO, welcome.

H (7:11)

Not.

B (7:12)

See what I did there? I wasn't late.

F (7:14)

I was here.

B (7:15)

I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding. Do you want to shake on it? I don't. Because you want to shake.

E (7:19)

Whoa. You got a buzzer in that hand.

B (7:21)

Yeah, exactly. I go shake, and then I go. Actually, Josh Firestein. Friday, Saturday, April 24th and 25th. Comedy Avenue, Lawton, Oklahoma. Yes.

E (7:30)

Tickets@JayFirestein.com. it's a small. It's. It's fun. It's. It's actually a tattoo parlor.

B (7:35)

Wow.

E (7:36)

Yeah, I'm a. I'm a tattoo parlor comedian.

B (7:38)

I am still ink free.

E (7:40)

Oh, man. We gotta get you a tattoo.

B (7:42)

But I might need to cover up the chest hair gap with.

E (7:45)

That's where you get the tattoo. He's gotta look cool as hell.

B (7:47)

Maybe like a crusader cross. Ooh.

E (7:50)

Yeah. Or maybe like the. The Virgin Mary.

B (7:53)

No.

E (7:55)

Why not? Like one of those.

B (7:56)

Doesn't be disrespectful.

E (7:58)

No, it's like one of the candles

B (7:59)

to put the Mary next to my memories. I know. I don't have memories. Oh, Mary's memories.

E (8:05)

I love that clinic.

B (8:06)

Stop it. But it's Not a bad idea. Let's get to the reasons that we said people might think the show was racist. So it's time. You know what you have the singer. Yeah. High on India. Go India.

F (8:27)

Made in India.

E (8:30)

Did we outsource that Stinger?

B (8:34)

It's an oldie. It came to us from the workers at Sprint Indians. Hold your thoughts. Indian weddings, arranged marriages, young ladies. Sparks really flew between all of these elements when you combine them.

E (8:54)

Oh, there you go.

F (8:57)

Right in the face.

E (8:58)

Yeah. Till death do us part right now. Screw you, wife.

B (9:02)

Till right now do us part.

E (9:06)

Let's hold hands. Far away.

F (9:09)

You see the guy behind him telling them to hold hands?

B (9:11)

Yeah. Now they're holding hands. Like, it's like they have a yardstick between them

E (9:18)

now.

B (9:18)

I think what happened is she didn't like being given away, and so she aimed it right at his ponum. And then he was like, you're going to spark me? I spark you? No, no. And it became a fight. Kind of like when you were kids with Roman candles, which, you know is fine when you're a kid in your backyard. Probably not great for a wedding.

A (9:35)

No.

F (9:35)

How did it not catch them on fire?

B (9:36)

Well, an Indian reporter actually wrote about that. He wrote, a single spark could have turned this grand stage into a cremation ground. Relatives might come to the rescue. But what sense does it make to risk your life just for the sake of a few likes on social media?

E (9:53)

Wait, Does India have cremation grounds?

B (9:57)

That's a good question.

E (9:58)

What is that?

F (9:58)

That sounds brutal.

E (10:00)

It does.

B (10:01)

Take them to the field where we burn them in place. That's right. Take them to the crematorium. Alive or dead?

H (10:08)

Both.

B (10:09)

Just as good.

E (10:09)

I'd like to spread his ashes in the Indian Ocean.

F (10:12)

No, no, no.

E (10:13)

You can do it here.

B (10:14)

Yes.

F (10:15)

Cow dung on the ground.

B (10:18)

It's not really an ocean, more of a trash tub. So that's a wedding. In India, all cultures are equal. You should see how they deal with Div.

E (10:40)

Did we really need the two?

F (10:42)

Yes.

B (10:43)

Was it two per hour? One per minute? Two per hour. Two per hour. I think two per hour died by.

E (10:50)

Those are 20, 25 numbers.

F (10:52)

They could be wrong.

B (10:53)

They could be plus or minus two.

E (10:55)

And if trains.

B (10:56)

If you thought that was bad, and us experimenting with AI in the wee hours of the morning, you should see a Bollywood divorce.

F (11:14)

He stayed.

E (11:15)

Important note, he stayed on the track.

B (11:17)

He did. He did.

F (11:18)

And, yeah, he didn't get hit.

B (11:20)

He defecated. Like, follow the railroad tie road. He's like ghost Pajit.

E (11:28)

He looked like Indian Apple jacket. Yes, that's what Tim said earlier.

G (11:32)

And.

B (11:32)

And by the way, don't get me started on the funerals, you f. Idiot. I'm trying to call you from tomorrow. Can't you see my call you. So, like I said, some people may perceive it as racist.

F (11:47)

It's not.

E (11:49)

He said, I'm trying to call you from tomorrow.

B (11:53)

Take my call. You're going to die. Oh, look, it's Dante. Now I would love to see the Indian ring movie.

E (12:01)

Yes, hello, this is Chase Bank. You are going to die in seven days if you don't give me your credit card number.

B (12:13)

Hello, lady with the long hair who comes out of the tv. Someone has stolen your card. You have to give me your number. The movie is the well girl gets haunted by the Indian. Hello?

D (12:29)

Hello?

B (12:31)

That's the garage. That's not even the same movie. Give me your pin. Seven days. How do all credit card fraud, the scams that target old people who are on Social Security. How do they all come from one country? Let's. There needs to be some self correction mechanism every time you get what you're like, come on. All right. And I know some will say, not all, not all. Okay, just 99.99 of the time.

F (12:57)

We'll just send a missile.

E (12:58)

Those poor Nigerian guys. I know, they get stereotyp. They're like, hey, we're not just killing Christians. And we're also not just, you know, doing the old prince scam, right?

F (13:08)

Yeah, we claim to be princes. We don't do that.

B (13:10)

All right, big topic. We have to get to this one. Yes. Birthright citizenship. Now, I want to be really clear about this. The left. And we're going to get to the Supreme Court. They want you to believe that if you are born here, even if your parents are illegal, you are automatically a citizen. That anchor babies are a thing that it's always been a thing that birthright citizenship was meant to extend to anybody who happens to have their foot on this soil and have a baby. It's not true. It's inaccurate. We can walk through it and we will. Though we've done a more in depth segment, the recent judgments, the recent opinions expressed, which are nonsensical, muddy the waters even more by design. So to be clear, for the sake of the country, we have to stop anchor babies. Hey, you're from mocathy Shoe and call

D (13:55)

me crazy, but you can't live here

B (13:59)

because I'm anchor baby.

D (14:01)

Our laws and birthright are abused insanely. So stop the number of anchor babies and.

B (14:09)

And this is One of those things that. That generates normalcy, bias in a way that, frankly, is unprecedented. You'll see this a lot, for example, that everyone votes. And if you say, like, actually, you know, the 19th Amendment is a problem not because of women voting, but because we were a representative republic and the republic was supposed to represent those who are building and sustaining a country. It has not been the norm that everyone who lives within the borders of a country gets a vote, that their vote is the same. If you are actually taking benefits, social welfare, not contributing, not paying taxes, not willing to serve your country, it's a very new thing. You've grown up under that. So you think that that's how it's always been or how it's always going to be. That's not the case. Same thing with this idea of anchor babies. To use the colloquialism, that if someone is born here, that automatically makes them a citizen and gives their parents a pathway. That has never been the norm historically. It still is not in any European nation. You just think that because you've been told that, and since some people have abused a loophole, you assume it's the case. So if you were to listen to the left, you would believe, oh, born here, automatically a citizen.

C (15:22)

Does it matter if your ancestry goes back to the Mayflower or if you're first gen like myself, or somewhere in between? If you were born on American soil, you're an American citizen, full stop.

B (15:34)

Nope.

C (15:35)

End of story.

B (15:36)

For over 100 years, birthright citizenship has been enshrined as a fundamental right under the 14th amendment. The language in the amendment is very clear. There are 255,000 children born on American soil. And I would say that

I (15:53)

most of

B (15:54)

them are probably not here because of

E (15:56)

probably not, you have no idea, or

B (15:58)

whatever you call it.

H (15:59)

In 1898, the Supreme Court held that the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to the children of foreigners

G (16:07)

present on U.S. soil.

B (16:10)

Okay, so the court never actually ruled about children of illegals. To be clear, that is simply inaccurate. And let us disabuse you of some of these notions. Drafters of the 14th, you can take their word for it, or you can actually read from the people who drafted the 14th amendment. They were clear it was never meant to give citizenship to everyone born on American soil. 1866, Senator Jacob Howard, one of the drafters, wrote this jurisdiction as here employed, ought to be construed as applies to every citizen of the United States. Now, gentlemen, cannot contend that an Indian belonging to a tribe, although born within the limits of A state is subject to this full and complete jurisdiction. So it's pretty clear it was meant to be. These people are meant to be subject to the jurisdiction of the land. All right, okay, we'll move on here to Ketanji Brown Jackson. Because now it's a word war. President Trump has been saying, hold on a second. You guys are wrong. And his executive order on birthright citizenship was argued by the Supreme Court. Yes, Gerald.

F (17:09)

It shouldn't even be contended at that point, though, you're saying, like, this is the easiest case, and a Native American, essentially an Indian on this land we have treaties with and we give special protections to is still not considered this, much less anybody else.

B (17:22)

Right.

F (17:22)

Like, that was the whole point of saying it like that. Using that example.

B (17:26)

Yes, super clear. I mean, I would argue.

E (17:29)

Super.

B (17:29)

You guys let me know and you can check out the references. Please go read not only the 14th Amendment, but the. The opinions and the explanations therein from the drafters. Steel man, it for me. Tell me how the left actually legitimately makes this case. Because here's the issue. We're not hearing the case being made in a way that is cogent at all from current Supreme Court justices. Let's go to Ketanji Brown Jackson. This judge argued that. And I think I understand what she's saying, you guys. And I mean, this. Explain to me if I'm missing it. She said that illegals have allegiance to the United States by virtue of breaking our laws, effectively. I think what she was saying, she compared to Japan. She said, if I'm in Japan as a tourist, right, And I steal someone's wallet, okay? So I'm subject to the law, and so would the person who steals my wallet. So I believe that her line of logic here is in Japan or in the United States, the laws are there to protect the governed, right? The citizens. If you are visiting as a tourist, you are subject to the law of the land. Therefore, that makes you allegiant to that land because you're subject to the law. I think that's her logic. But you see what she said, and maybe you can explain it to me here.

I (18:50)

I, US Citizen, am visiting Japan. And what it means is that, you know, if I steal someone's wallet in Japan, the Japanese authorities can arrest me and prosecute me. It's allegiance, meaning, can they control you as a matter of law? I can also rely on them if my wallet is stolen to, you know, under Japanese law, go and prosecute the person who has stolen it. So there's this relationship based on Even though I'm a temporary traveler, I'm just on vacation in Japan, I'm still locally owing allegiance in that sense.

B (19:33)

So little wrinkle. Now do the law of deportation, are they subject to that? Also interesting that she used Japan as an example because I think it was

E (19:44)

because she was talking to a woman named Wang.

B (19:46)

Yeah, I know. She's like, Wang. You know what I'm talking about?

E (19:48)

Yeah. Get it?

B (19:48)

Japan, right?

E (19:49)

I'm. She's like, I'm from San Francisco.

B (19:52)

Yeah. I'm from the Bay Area. Interesting that she uses Japan as an example. The left often does, for example, when convenient for gun control. But they don't actually tell you how the Japanese deal with illegals who are subject to the law. And for the record, this is all this original video. This is an illegal alien who is being sent back, I believe committed a crime. It's all in Japanese. So for those listening on audio, we dubbed all of it with 100% accuracy. And I mean that it's not a joke. With the regionally appropriate accent.

G (20:27)

He's tensing up. You don't have to touch up. Okay, Sit properly. Stop looking to the side. Face forward. Face forward. I said to sit properly.

B (20:37)

I can't go back.

G (20:38)

Sit properly. Behaving yourself. Just relax. Don't stand up. Someone sit on his knees. Okay, okay, okay.

B (20:47)

It hurts. You don't know.

G (20:52)

Just any action. Damn it. You so stubborn. The witch.

B (20:57)

My legs are. My. My legs.

G (20:59)

It doesn't matter. We're taking you. You're a rookie. We even have a pick. We are taking you no matter what. Oh, are you sad? I didn't want to change anything.

B (21:10)

I'm not going.

G (21:11)

Oh, yes, you are. Yes, you are. You will. Yes. Loosen up. You have so much energy. Why so energetic? You can do anything.

B (21:21)

Wow. I'm not well.

G (21:23)

You're so full of energy. You're the most energetic one to hear

B (21:29)

Japanese mother. Okay, so 99 accurate. To be clear, those listening audio, it matches these subtitles. We have someone here who understands a little bit of Japanese. That was an accurate. Can you imagine if ICE acted this way here?

H (21:47)

Yeah.

G (21:50)

You're going to cry for us. You have a crap like a little growing boy. You like a little baby.

E (22:01)

The plane thing is just so funny to me. You're lucky we have a plane.

B (22:04)

You're lucky we have a plane.

E (22:05)

What's the other option? Just dropping them in the ocean. They're an island.

F (22:10)

Good enough swimming there.

G (22:12)

Turn you into the eater. Anchor, baby anchor. Don't go on the land. Go in the Water.

B (22:24)

Just imagine that. Imagine that here I some guy sitting, looking, and he thinks, don't turn the face to side.

G (22:30)

Sit properly.

B (22:31)

And they just crank his shoulder.

G (22:33)

Ah, shut up.

B (22:35)

They don't tolerate it. They do not tolerate it.

E (22:38)

They didn't curse, though.

B (22:39)

No, they didn't

G (22:41)

stop a fighting.

E (22:42)

Oh, that's right. Yeah.

B (22:44)

Yeah, he got a little bit rattled.

E (22:46)

Yeah, I mean, they don't. But they don't have a God there.

B (22:49)

Well, effectively they do have a suicide force. So. Three things, three key things you need to know about birthright citizenship. Okay. Number one, the history here. So supporters of birthright citizenship, they claim that it's in the 14th amendment, right? All persons born or naturalized in the United States. Here's the key. And subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States. Key detail. Subject to the jurisdiction thereof. And Donald Trump addresses this is an uncomfortable truth. This is more about children of U.S. citizens and freed slaves than illegal aliens. To be clear, this was not about illegal aliens whose loyalty is to their home country. They are not subject to the jurisdiction to thereof. And I think the example that Ketanji Brown Jackson, again, since there are laws and if you are visiting, you are subject to those laws, that means allegiance. Laws include deportation. Laws include legal immigration. That would be like saying, if Notre Dame players, when you're in the big house in Michigan, you are now a legion.

F (23:57)

Yeah, I become a Wolverine when I walk on that field. It's like, no, I'm still fighting Irish. What are you talking about? Right?

B (24:02)

You are subject to their rules there. You go to the locker room, they tell you, but you still have a Notre Dame jersey.

F (24:07)

We still go home.

B (24:08)

Right. Someone who is here illegally who is not a citizen here is subject to the jurisdiction of another country. Could be Mexico, could be El Salvador, could be India, Pakistan, whatever it is, regardless of whether their children, whether their baby is born here. And so what happened is we just kind of stumbled into this system here of just giving citizenship to everyone born here. They just started issuing birth certificates to everyone born here in the 20th century. Now, keep in mind, at that point in time, they're like, oh, we have plenty of space. Sure. And then birth certificates were used as proof of citizenship to obtain things like Social Security numbers, things like that. Which by the way, today though, they want you to know that no one who is here illegally could take advantage of our social safety net or our social benefits, entitlement programs. And certainly no one here would be able to vote who was here illegally until we found out that a bunch of them had Social Security numbers. And that was kind of how it started. Number two, key details. The real problem here, like we said, is, is the birth tourism with anchor babies. You may not know. Did you know this that 9% of annual births here in the United States can be attributed to anchor babies, birth or tourism. Did you guys know that?

F (25:16)

No way.

E (25:17)

Well, Hirono said that it probably doesn't even happen much.

B (25:20)

Right. So that's overlay down later in the map, but I'll get to it. But President Trump wrote this on Truth Social. And it's correct, by the way he wrote birthright citizenship has to do with the babies. Sorry, it's correct. It's just tough to say. Yeah, birthright citizenship has to do with the babies of slaves, not Chinese billionaires who have 56 kids, all of whom, quote, become American citizens. One of the many great scams of our time. China actually does have a birth tourism industry. You have 500 companies. The estimate is one and a half million Chinese nationals have been granted or gained U.S. citizenship through this actual industry. To be clear, China, in case you don't know, they take anchor babies to the extreme. And it's a huge problem. Like I said, see, you are not

G (26:16)

the only bad one. Baby traditional use has been an anchor, Not like a China. We are island China. We're not like a China because we're not an animal. We use our paper as anchor, not

F (26:40)

throw away on mountain. China had that, too.

B (26:45)

Sorry.

F (26:46)

It's sad.

E (26:47)

Yeah. Why did you laugh when you said sorry?

B (26:49)

It's service.

G (26:49)

Laughter mistake. Ocean for bathtub.

H (26:54)

Oh.

G (26:56)

Can't tell.

B (26:58)

So it's a huge problem. Anchor baby abuse. 20, 23. You can bring us up. This is from Pew Research. Nine percent of all births were anchor babies. Nine percent. That's wild. And then just add to the mix. Hey, to parent. That's used to basically anchor a whole family. Here we're just talking about babies. Number three. It's funny. Katanji Brown Jackson just talked about Japan. They have unbelievably stringent immigration laws, but the left will always pick and choose. They'll go to Norway when it's convenient to say, see these Nordic models, these socialist models, they've kind of worked. And they sort of ignore the fact that it's racially a monolith. It's incredibly homogenous. They will ignore other facets where people, for example, actually don't get a lot of the social safety benefits until they've worked. Worked there for a while, or they're actually precluded from working for Example, people are dealing with this in Canada, so they always pick and choose when they're trying to tell you that America is actually not a great country. So in total, 33 countries do allow automatic birthright citizenship. None of them are European. None of them are nations that would be comparable to the United States.

E (28:07)

So a lot of these nations are Japan, by the way. Yeah, I noticed.

F (28:10)

Yeah, definitely not.

B (28:11)

Certainly not countries like Norway, Sweden. This is not. We are the only of our ilk who do this.

F (28:18)

I love how they use Australia. Who the hell's gonna get there? To have a baby surrounded by water like, okay, you gonna swim across that ocean?

B (28:24)

It has to survive the snakes and the saltwater crocs.

F (28:27)

Like, yeah, if you get born here, you get to stay.

B (28:29)

Yeah, you'll die. And here's the deal. Birthright. You guys know this. Birthright citizenship is killing our culture. And Congress has done nothing about it, to be clear. They just go, well, people kind of accept it now, so it's okay. Yeah, but it's not though. It's not okay anymore. It's certainly not okay when you look at the jobs added for foreign born citizens versus versus native born citizens. It's certainly not okay when you look at the percentage of people who don't speak English. Look, someone coming here and going through the process and taking their naturalization oath, and I know this, I have family members who have done it and I have plenty of friends, colleagues, lovers who also have had to go through it. They have to show some semblance of understanding. Appreciation for that's not always the same thing. Certainly when people go, oh, by default, I have a baby here, so I'll get around to it. When I get around to it. It's a way of gaming the system. It's a way of reaping the benefits of a system that exists without actually contributing. The left wants you to believe it's always been this way. It hasn't. So it should always be this way. It doesn't have to be. You comment. What was Ketanji Brown Jackson saying? Because when people will say intelligentsia, well, Democrats are more intelligent. They're talking about that. They're talking about her statement regarding Japan. Does anyone here think it's anything other than nonsensical? The law has to be clear. That's what we are attempting to do right now. Whether it's regarding anchor babies or pickpockets.

E (30:07)

Hey, Nick, what are you looking for? Your motivation to live?

B (30:11)

Uh, no, no, I, I just watched Apollo's show and he used one of the Jokes I gave him, so I wanted to send him a tip, but I can't find my wallet.

E (30:19)

Wait, shouldn't he be sending you the tip since it's your joke?

B (30:23)

Josh, you don't understand the finance of comedy.

E (30:27)

Yeah, why don't you just use the Rumble Wallet?

F (30:29)

The what?

E (30:29)

Rumble Wallet. It's a non custodial digital wallet that has end to end encryption and only you have access to it. You could use it to tip Nick the funny one.

B (30:39)

That's a good idea. I'll go do that now. Hey, yeah? Can you do me a favor? If you see my wallet, can you let me know? Yeah, yeah, of course.

E (30:57)

Hey, Applejack, I found it.

B (30:59)

Awesome, man. You saved my life.

E (31:01)

Yeah.

B (31:02)

Let me give you a tip. Oh, looks like I'm not really liquid right now. Can I owe you? Oh, that's.

E (31:10)

That's right. Why don't you just send me a C note on Rumble Wallet? We talked about this, right?

H (31:14)

Yeah.

B (31:14)

Yeah, good idea. Yeah, I'll do that. All right.

E (31:17)

Take it easy, man.

B (31:17)

Yeah.

H (31:20)

That guy.

B (31:21)

Seriously. Download the Rumble Wallet and step away from big banks for good. No fees, no middlemen. None of the crap you have to deal with. Where you go in and they say you have some concierge account, but it's some guy who wants to tell you about Bitcoin and he's doing mining. Lyle, go to wallet.rumble.com today and you can also support your favorite creators. Step away from big banks. Rumble.

E (31:44)

Walt.

B (31:45)

Ah, no money.

E (31:49)

Sorry, Applejack can't stand that Lyle.

B (31:51)

I know, I know. Thank you for the raid, by the way, Dan. We appreciate it. We're gonna send the rest of you onto Hailey Corona after this. Welcome, new viewers.

F (31:58)

Two seconds. You made a really great point. If you're not gonna deport people who are in our prisons, then we don't really need to go further in this conversation.

B (32:05)

Right.

F (32:05)

If you're not willing to say that illegal aliens who are not here under any agreement with us can have a baby. It's an American citizen. We understand your position. We don't need to have any further conversation. You just want to want everybody.

B (32:16)

Sure.

F (32:16)

It almost sounds like easy.

E (32:17)

It almost sounds like she's trying to like, you know, combine the two things here.

B (32:22)

Yeah.

E (32:22)

By saying, oh, well, if they. If you come to a crime somewhere, well, your allegiance is to that country now. And now you have to serve your time there. And now you get citizenship.

F (32:29)

Yeah.

B (32:29)

So it's like.

E (32:30)

Well, the whole argument of getting rid of illegals in our prisons now becomes obsolete if the Supreme Court says, well, if you commit a crime here, you're allowed to stay, obviously, but we have to put you in jail for totally not long enough.

B (32:40)

Right? Yeah. Well, this goes back to the left. Always absolving you of actions. One could argue, could argue that if somebody is here illegally and breaks the law, it almost would show a pattern of behavior where they don't have allegiance to the United States because they have no regard for our laws. Let me ask you, any of you, I know that you have traveled abroad to other countries. Give me one of the countries you went to.

F (33:01)

France.

B (33:02)

France. Did you obey the laws while you were in France?

E (33:04)

Most.

B (33:04)

Okay, I sped. Yeah. Outside of that, while you were in France, were you still American?

F (33:09)

Yeah, I hope so.

B (33:10)

You weren't French? No. In your mind, were you?

F (33:12)

I didn't become French.

B (33:13)

Did you pledge allegiance to French? I have a prick, but yeah, yeah, sure, that's natural. But you were still American, right?

F (33:18)

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

E (33:18)

I bet the French constantly reminded him, yes.

B (33:21)

You travel abroad.

E (33:22)

Yeah.

B (33:23)

Name me any country.

E (33:24)

Mexico.

B (33:25)

Okay. When you were in Mexico, did you follow the laws to the best of your ability?

E (33:28)

Yes.

B (33:29)

I should. I shouldn't ask the question I don't know the answer to. Both of you are lawbreakers. Okay.

E (33:32)

I should have said Mexico.

B (33:33)

Yes. Broke some laws. You're in Mexico. Follow the laws. While you were in Mexico, were you still an American?

E (33:39)

Absolutely.

B (33:39)

You didn't think of yourself as Mexican?

E (33:41)

No.

B (33:41)

No, no. Never crossed your mind? No. Okay, Brown. Jackson's an idiot. All right, next one. Here's two things President Trump said yesterday. And then cue the outrage. One coming from the left and the dissident, the horseshoe. Right. The don't vote. Right. And then the other, just outrage from the left, period. Now I understand when I heard him say this, I said, ah, okay, this is the argument people, they're going to pounce on that because of the optics. He was discussing daycare. He was asked about it. He said that we couldn't afford it because we have going on things like wars, etc. And I knew that people are going to say, see, our payments are going to Iran. Let me just present my perspective. I certainly don't believe in nation building. I certainly don't believe in forever wars. That's why I said, give it three months and then I will determine my final, my final opinion on Iran. Okay. But I never want to make the argument we shouldn't protect the United States or we should never engage in any type of conflict because that money should go to entitlements. That's why I don't share the same outrage. So here's what he said. And then I also want to maybe illuminate something that people are missing that I think has been highlighted by the Strait of Hormuz and the Iran conflict.

H (34:57)

Q CLIP the United States can't take care of daycare. That has to be up to a state. We can't take care of daycare. We're a big country. We have 50 states, we have all these other people. We're fighting wars. We can't take care of daycare. You got to let a state take care of daycare. And they should pay for it too. They should pay. They have to raise their taxes, but they should pay for it. And we could lower our taxes a little bit to them to make up for. But we, it's not possible for us to take care of daycare. Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things. They can do it on a state basis. You can't do it on a federal. We have to take care of one thing, military protection. We have to guard the country.

B (35:39)

And to be clear, we've shown you this pie chart before. Entitlement programs make up. It's the single biggest line item as far as our spending. Okay. Yep. Military is pretty big. Not as big as entitlement. Entitlement spending. Also for those of you who say, hey, schools should be a state issue, if you're a conservative right leaning maga, which I am, that's perfectly in line with what we've always believed to say. This is a problem. Take away the obfuscation of Iran equals no daycare. Do you really think the federal government should increase taxes across the board and you should pay an increased income tax, for example in Oklahoma to pay for daycare in Momdani's New York because he just promised it to all municipal employees. Right?

E (36:18)

Yeah, exactly. Because the states have different economies.

B (36:20)

Yes.

E (36:21)

They have different cost of livings. It's all dependent by state.

B (36:24)

You can't be making somebody who's and different priorities. Some states that are more traditional maybe say, hey you know what, we actually don't want to hand over children to the state. We want to provide parents with more options. So maybe some tax breaks, some tax credits. Maybe we can create an environment within our state where more people can stay home with their children. And by the way, some states have done that. But here's something else because people point and they go see, our payments are going to Iran. You know who else wouldn't be able to pay for daycare? All the nations that leftists and the horseshoe right point to in Europe, if they had to defend themselves. So unless you start with the premise that there are no threats ever globally, that there are no evil actors, there are no people who actually want to harm us, and everyone's actually okay with the Western world, you have to take into account the EU spends 2.3% collectively, this is a general estimate on family child care benefits. That's about $425 billion a year. Contrast that with their defense spending, $396 billion a year. Hey, if all of them have to meet their NATO requirements, guess what? No more daycare. The only reason they haven't is because we protect the free world. Now, I know and I agree.

I (37:38)

We.

B (37:38)

There's a good case to be made, and I have made it, that we shouldn't be in NATO. We shouldn't be protecting the free world. But it's, it's become very clear European nations aren't going to do it. They are the ones who need the Strait of Hormuz secured. I know people will say, well, if we didn't get to this conflict, there would be no issue. Do you really think that at no point Iran would cause a problem there? And do you really think that the EU would be prepared to deal with it? Or would they be sitting there with their hand out in front of the United States as they have done through NATO for decades? So because Europe, because these nations don't spend on daycare, don't spend on the military, they can spend on daycare. Germany, they declared Internet a fundamental human right. Protect your own country, go. Changes everything. That's the messaging that I would like to see. So let me give you. Here's also another report. If they were to replace the United States forces in Europe, meaning if we said, you know what? You're on your own. You don't have our forces, so you got to make up that gap. You have to get it somewhere. They're spending 400 something billion dollars a year on daycare. You know what the cost would be? A trillion dollars. It would take 25 years. There goes their daycare.

E (38:50)

This crazy idea. Crazy idea. Us. I'm okay with protecting the world, doing, you know, helping them out when they need it. But you got to pay us.

B (38:58)

Yep. How about that?

E (38:59)

You got to pay us. You got to do something.

B (39:01)

Oh, and if you don't let us use the bases that we've been paying for, France, Spain, you now owe us a fine.

E (39:08)

Yeah, for sure.

B (39:10)

By the way, US federal government already spent about $29 billion a year on child care subsidies. So it's not nothing to be clear. And I think that that should largely be nothing. You can't be conservative and also want to see the large welfare state that has single handedly created and encouraged, fostered the culture of baby mamas. There's an incentive for people to have children, not get married, avoid a nuclear family so they can get those subsidies.

E (39:36)

Some people do it while living together.

F (39:37)

Yeah.

B (39:38)

Yep.

E (39:38)

They'll go, hey, we have kids, we're still together, but let's not get married because if we get married, then I can't keep these benefits.

B (39:44)

Right. And then it's a vicious cycle because it continues and they're more likely to separate. They're more likely to need the. To need the support I have in principle. Absolutely. Military is the most important, probably the most fundamental role of any government. Right. Is to keep us safe. That's a purview of the federal government, both from internal, external threats. Got it. Giving you all the things that you want paid for is not. It's not. So it really does pain me to see conservatives saying this is betrayal. Take away the Iran thing just as far as that dynamic going. Either Iran or daycare, okay? Apply it to any other nation, either safety or welfare. They've opted for welfare. They cannot keep themselves safe. It's not possible. And I don't want to see that grow anywhere here in the United States. No.

F (40:32)

And I mean, basically the point Trump is making is like, hey, don't grow the size of the federal government by making this a federal government issue. This should be a state issue for you guys to determine. You can raise taxes for it or not raise taxes for it. The right should be all over that and be like, yeah, we don't want the federal government getting bigger.

B (40:48)

Right.

F (40:48)

Fantastic.

B (40:49)

Yeah. Yeah. And some people go, yeah, X hundred billion for Iran. Okay? But that's not always the case. And guess what? Not everybody has free daycare. And it's horrible. And public schools suck. It hasn't worked.

F (41:01)

Stay at home, Mom. Screw the daycare thing.

B (41:02)

Yeah. Before this conflict, people were going, public schools suck and kids should be able to stay at home. Now they're going, see, Iran is taking money, so I can't have daycare. Well, you know what? I shouldn't. I shouldn't be paying for your daycare. No, that's my opinion. Here's the next point that generated controversy. He discussed Somalis. Rightfully so. Apparently statistics are racist. But I understand why people would say it's racist. I still support it. Anyway, it's Time for eye on Somalia. Look at me. Sure. I'm the captain now. All right. Listen to his comments here. Boy, there is a crap storm on social media over it.

H (41:39)

How about in Minnesota? They come from Somalia, but they come from all over. They're all crooked in Minnesota. The governor's crooked. The attorney general's a crook. He's a thief. Terrible guy. All stupid, crooked people. And they came in from. In this case, Somalia is just terrible. A lot of people say it's the worst country anywhere in the world. They have no money, no nothing. They have no government. They have no police. They just shoot each other all day long. It's just. It's just pure bad.

B (42:07)

Probably true.

H (42:08)

The worst, most dangerous country. We have some beauties. They go to Minnesota and they stole $19 billion. $19 billion. And they're low IQ generally. I mean, I can generalize. They're low IQ people. They're bad people. They're. They have 94% unemployment. In other words, they don't want to work, you know, get a lot of jobs available.

G (42:33)

Right.

H (42:33)

With the economy, they don't want to work. Why would they work? And they sell more Mercedes Benzes than any state in the union because they come here with no money and they go out. They love a Mercedes Benz, and they go out and buy Mercedes Benzes.

B (42:48)

Okay? So people outraged. Again, if you listen to this entire sort of. I guess we call it what would be press junket. It wasn't. Wasn't a speech. You just talking to the press. The theme was states rights was what's the appropriate role of the federal government? Because he talked about Minnesota needs to clean this up. They need to do something. This state is crooked. People are really mad because anytime you touch on IQ they go, that's a racist trope. Here's the truth. The average Somali IQ is 67. Mental retardation is 70 or less. Retard alert.

F (43:24)

That principal would need to get a whole lot of action to get your kid in that school.

B (43:27)

School 67, that's really bad. Now, you could say it might be higher for Somali Americans because of malnourishment over there. And sure, okay. It's still, by any metric that you can use low iq. And he's right. They don't work, they don't contribute. They don't contribute to the state. But they take.

E (43:47)

There's a cultural element to that, too.

B (43:49)

Yes.

E (43:49)

It's not just like, oh, you're from Somalia. That means you have a low iq. It's not just that. It's, oh, you're from Somalia and you have a culture of incest, malnutrition, you know, whatever, whatever. The incest thing is the main one for me.

B (44:04)

Generational incest, by the way.

E (44:06)

Yeah, it's. It's been happening for years. That's the biggest one for me. I'm sure there's other, other, you know, elements contributing, but yeah, that's the number one.

B (44:12)

Just to be clear, there'll be one person bring that here. Actually, incest is a myth. And I understand one. One incident of incest. Incest, the birth defects are increased from normal, but not as much as you've been told, but it compounds with each generation and it's generational incest, not just in Somalia, but almost all Islamic countries.

E (44:33)

And then you bring that culture over here and it says, well, it's okay to do it. So we do it. And then we got to take care of the mentally retarded people. Because, I mean, that is something that Social Security covers.

B (44:41)

Right.

E (44:41)

And it should. But not when it's being brought from another culture.

B (44:44)

You don't.

E (44:45)

Who's making it? Yes, you'd like they're purpose. Not purposefully, but kind of purposely making it.

B (44:50)

Look, he can't. Here's what I will say. It is like importing millions of people from an actual retard making factory and saying we are importing them because and to be clear, it's not a racing. The retard making factory is generations of incest with no interest in changing it and bringing them here knowing that they just left the retard making factory and stuffed it in some packing peanuts and a box. That's Minnesota.

E (45:17)

Thanks for saying that. I was dancing around.

B (45:22)

Speaking of incest, he also mentioned Somali congresswoman and professional brother lover. That is a fact.

H (45:28)

Ilhan Omar who married her husband to married her brother. Her brother became her husband. When she has to check a book she says is any brothers one. Any husband one. On top of everything else, she gets a double income tax cut. She's. She's a stone cold crook and everybody knows it.

B (45:51)

And here is the problem with the media. Here is the problem with the institutional left. If you are more outraged at him saying Somalis have low iq. If you are more outraged at him pointing out that Ilhan Omar and you can find. You can see the marriage certificate. We've shown it to you many times. Married her brother. If you are more outraged about those statements than importing, than mass importing Somalis and the fact that Ilhan Omar married her brother, that means you don't have an objective bone in your body and you're not looking out for the American people. That's my opinion. We don't need to spend much more time on it. The outrage is silly. Also, by the way, the only other company, if you want to be healthier, if you don't want to be from the retard making factory, hey, a good multivitamin helps. It's the only other company that I own that I've created Foundation. You can go to foundationdaily.com, get 40% off. It is a multivitamin with clinically effective ingredients at their clinically effective doses. Completely transparent labeling and it's what I've been taking for years and I have to take it and all these other pills. Basically just a multivitamin. Vitamin D K, magnesium, turmeric, curcumin and garlic. And clinically proven. I can actually make that claim clinically proven in clinical studies and trials at the doses that we put in the bottle. Foundationdaily.com and if you subscribe, hey, that's another way to keep the lights on as opposed. It's like mug club membership only you just take multivamon. You take anyway and it's much, much better. It's the best one in the world, I will tell you that. Hey, did you notice we've gone back to the moon? Sort of back. Kind of back.

E (47:22)

I mean we're doing a fly by. I know.

B (47:24)

Okay.

E (47:24)

And we're not there yet. We still gotta make a rotation around the earth and then we on a

F (47:28)

set in California again.

G (47:31)

Whoa.

E (47:31)

That was allegedly.

F (47:34)

I like making fun of people who say we claim, you know, we faked the moon landing.

B (47:37)

Sorry you were. That killed a moment.

F (47:39)

It's your show.

E (47:40)

Go.

B (47:42)

Josh did it too. Because I know that people, you know,

E (47:44)

I just had your back because you're, you're the CEO and I wanted to have your back.

B (47:47)

Yeah, people in the comment section are going to be saying that. You don't need to say it for them. By the way, you are free to leave those comments. 11:00am Weekdays. Every weekday. Tomorrow we'll be off because it's a good Friday. And yeah, we'll be back Monday. So yesterday, historic event. Massive implications for the future. Some that many people may not know. We are doing a drive by fly by the moon.

H (48:15)

Let me begin by congratulating the team at NASA and our brave astronauts on the success, successful launch of Artemis 2. It was quite something. It will be traveling further than any manned rocket has ever flown and will very substantially pass the moon. Go around it and come back home from a distance that has never been done before. It's amazing. They are on the way and God bless them. These are brave people.

E (48:46)

We landed on the moon.

B (48:49)

Roger. Roll pitch. Houston now controlling the flight of integrity on the Artemis 2 mission around the moon. Confirmed. Separation main engines throttling up. Guidance converged now. I think that's pretty cool. I'll tell you who else thinks it's pretty cool. Probably couldn't be more excited. This kid. Why do you want to be here? Why do you love space? Why do you love being a part of history? We're going back to the frickin moon. That's why. Yeah.

E (49:28)

Dude.

B (49:29)

Stupid reporter.

E (49:30)

Yeah.

B (49:31)

Why would you ask such a stupid question? Yeah. Dummy looked like he was mad that

E (49:36)

he asked the question.

B (49:37)

Why would you ask me that, you silly person? So the Artemis 2, just so you know, it's only going to be. Yeah. Orbiting the moon, but I'm saying we're going back to the moon. It's a test run for two moon landings. Yeah. That we're going to be seeing afterwards. It's the first time back to the moon in 54 years. Some people saying the first time, some people saying zero times. This is also another deep fake. It's going to last about 10 days, 685,000 miles of travel. They are going to, in fact, go further from Earth than anyone ever. A few key facts here that are pretty important for you to know. We are in a new space race with China. That's number one. And of course, Lane, the brain is very passionate about this because he doesn't want China to get. He doesn't want them to get their tiny claws in on the moon.

F (50:17)

He hates the Chinese.

B (50:18)

It's basically a race for the lunar south pole, which is kind of the ideal spot for a moon base. Whoever really sets up shop there first, they set the rules. Another kind of key detail here. Number two, the moon can be used to eventually launch to Mars. It's much easier from the moon.

F (50:36)

That's Elon's plan. Right now they're just going directly to Mars. It's to go to moon base, then go from there to Mars.

B (50:41)

And key fact number three, I mean, I know it's no universal daycare like Europe who don't pay for any of their own national security spending. But President Trump did set the wheels in motion for this. This was in 2017. He issued Space Policy Directive 1, which did create this program. So a big moment in American history. It does have some. There will be some significant Fallout from it. It's not just, hey, isn't it cool to go to the moon? And I think this is one of those things. Can we all find some kind of like, hey, that's pretty cool. I'm glad that. I'm glad that we've done it.

E (51:10)

It is.

F (51:11)

It was moments I shared with my kids. It's like, look at this rocket. Like, they were, like, just amazed by it. And I'm like, see, that's fantastic.

H (51:16)

Look.

B (51:17)

Yeah.

E (51:17)

I don't think we should have waited this long. I think it's a good thing.

F (51:22)

I think our program discover what's unknown for a while, though. Like, it really did take a change in administration, a change in philosophy, and people like Elon Musk and Bezos pushing the envelope on kind of commercial space flight, too.

B (51:34)

Yeah. In the 21st century, a few fat black chicks with calculators ain't gonna cut it.

F (51:37)

Nah.

E (51:38)

You know, this space race between us and China, it presents a hilarious opportunity for Taiwan.

G (51:44)

Yeah.

E (51:45)

What if Taiwan got to the moon?

B (51:46)

That would be pretty fun. And then China's like, oh, no, you do again. Oh, fancy you. See you here.

F (51:55)

We independent up here too,

B (52:00)

by the way. According to Kelsey, the chances that we go back and land on the moon, for some reason, they say not so great before 2027. 9.8%. And then 11% by 2028.

E (52:10)

Well, I. You said a moment ago that it was planned.

B (52:13)

Right.

E (52:13)

2028 landings.

B (52:14)

Right.

E (52:15)

So before would be quite. Quite.

B (52:17)

I don't know why they have those. Hold on. Time out, time out, time out.

F (52:20)

Can we. Can we bring that back up again? Because this may be a market opportunity for us.

E (52:25)

What?

F (52:26)

They announced plans to go and land on the moon in 2028.

E (52:29)

But this is before 2024. No, no, hold on.

F (52:31)

Listen. Listen to my. Listen to my train of thought here.

E (52:32)

Gotcha.

B (52:33)

I don't want to.

F (52:34)

It's impossible for us to go before we go.

B (52:37)

I know.

F (52:38)

So betting on going before 2027 sounds like a lock.

B (52:41)

Yeah.

F (52:42)

I mean, unless it's anybody going.

E (52:44)

I mean, the odds aren't you're not gonna make that much money, but you will make some money.

B (52:46)

It does say NASA specifically.

F (52:48)

If there's a. If there's a bot out there trading on this, I guarantee you they're playing the hell out of this.

C (52:52)

Like,

B (52:54)

all right, let's go from space back to, well, the space in our hearts.

E (53:02)

Soft moment. Here we go back to India.

B (53:04)

No, we're not going back to India.

F (53:05)

Oh, by the way, they fixed the toilet on the Art, do you see that? The first thing that happened is the toilet broke. And we're like, well, son of a gun.

B (53:11)

Do you think that happened? Like, I had a friend who was riding on someone's private plane and they were traveling, they were crossing the ocean, and he went to use the toilet. And as it came out, the man who owned the plane said, hey, by the way, don't go number two in there. It doesn't work. And he was like, ah, that happens. All right, we are prepared. Oh, quick note, the toilet doesn't flush. I. What?

E (53:35)

I did that in my dad's rv.

G (53:36)

Oh, no.

E (53:37)

Yeah, my dad has a fifth wheel.

B (53:39)

We went to go see him.

E (53:41)

I did my business and it came out and I was like, the trash cans all full of toilet paper. Catherine's like, yeah, your dad said not to. Oh, not to do that. I go, oh, it was a big load down there.

B (53:53)

Missed that part.

E (53:54)

So he's finding out right now.

F (53:56)

We just need Eddie standing outside of the ship. Shitter was full.

B (54:01)

So back to the space and set our hearts, guys. Okay, fine. Because the language that we all speak is love. And love is all. Love is all you need. I mean, rocket fuel, if you're going into orbit.

F (54:13)

Food, yes.

B (54:13)

Water. I mean, some way to sustain life, but you know, love figuratively. So we get a lot of questions from you guys and we get a lot of questions from women and a lot of questions from men. And I know there's feminism and then people sort of point to the red pill community. And that's kind of a weird. The manosphere, where you have people like Andrew Tate, Myron Gaines, and they share nothing in common with people like Andrew Wilson. But I will say this, what you do see as a trend, if we. Let's just eliminate the outliers. I don't think that feminism is an outlier. I think the extreme views or the view that you should sleep with as many women as possible, you know, in that manosphere, is an outlier. But let's just get rid of the blue haired feminists and let's get rid of the outliers on the far right. Manosphere, as people refer to it. I don't know how else to refer to it. The dynamic that we see that is consistent is young men who want to get married. Right. This is really only for people who want to get married. And this is really only directed at people who want to have a more traditional marriage that is hard to come by these days. And a lot of men who have been traditional their whole lives and have now worked and achieved some degree of success. We get a lot of questions regarding this. They say, yeah, but how do I know that the women who are closer to my age who now say that they want to be a stay at home wife or a mom, or they want a more traditional relationship when they live their whole life progressively in a feminist way, how do I know that they're being genuine? And so a lot of guys aren't willing to take that risk. And they're checking out because you see a trend. This is becoming increasingly common now. It could just be because of social media. I think you probably would have seen women saying this from the 60s with all the way up until now, where they do college, glorified years of alcoholism, finding themselves traveling boss, babe. And then they say, well, actually now I do want a more traditional life. How can a man who's taking that risk identify if someone is being genuine? And you as a woman, how do you know that you're coming at it from a genuine place? Well, I have a litmus test for you, but first I'm going to show you a montage of women who were at one point feminist. And I would argue most of them, when you watch us, still are. But saying, actually, I do want to be a wife now I do want to be a mom. I don't want to be boss, babe, feminist. But what I want you to do, as these people have the revelation, I want you to just, with this montage, count how many times you hear an ask or a demand. Let's watch.

D (56:52)

Do you want to know? One of the saddest realizations I recently had was that as a liberal woman, it is really hard to find a man who is willing to play the more traditional masculine role in the relationship in today's day and age, who is not a conservative.

I (57:08)

Do I wish I had the ability to be at home and to be able to take on the traditional woman's role in a home? Absolutely.

B (57:17)

Ask.

I (57:18)

Do I give off more masculine energy? Yeah. Am I a good housekeeper? No. Have I ever been a good housekeeper? No. I have this eternal struggle where it's like, I want my husband to be the provider, make all the money, ask, pay all the bills, do the adulting things, fix everything around the house, take care of my car, take the trash out, make all the plans, handle our finances. So basically do everything while I just lie around and like, only do things when I feel like doing them.

H (57:43)

Ask.

D (57:44)

A guy is asking you, like, what your goals are and you're talking about how you want to continue to go back to school. And you want to do this and

B (57:52)

you want to do that. Ask.

D (57:53)

They're not hearing that you want to, you know, they're not hearing that you want to nurture your family.

I (57:57)

I don't believe in feminism. I think that if men are willing to do more and do do more, then they should make more. That's the first argument everybody's like mention, make more money than women. I don't want, want to be a carpenter. Get up for me. I want your seat.

D (58:11)

There's no reason we should get rid of those pieces of chivalry. All for feminism. Me and all my liberal friends want to be traditional housewives. Well, not all of us, but most of us. But the problem is we don't like Republican men.

I (58:26)

But like, I'm not talking about traditional gender roles because I'm not cooking, I'm not cleaning, I'm not doing his laundry. I also don't like to be told what to do. I can make my own decisions and I like making my own money. Ask, can somebody help?

D (58:38)

So I don't really know what to do because I don't want to compromise my morals and values just to find a man. But am I asking to have my cake and eat it too?

B (58:47)

I want leadership. But don't just like boss me around, you know, like, lead me, lead me when I'm in the mood to be led.

D (59:00)

I thought it was like a given that, hey, I'm a nurse. Of course, like I'm a nurturer and I'm gonna take care of my family. But in the meantime, while, you know, we don't have kids, is it, is it not attractive that I have a career going for me?

I (59:21)

Or does that mean I would not prefer a more traditional woman role in a household?

B (59:26)

Ask.

I (59:27)

No, I would love that.

D (59:28)

Ones that bust their ass and make enough money to support a stay at home mom, wife, whatever. Other Republican men, because they will exploit the out of themselves for money.

E (59:40)

Wrong. I would never exploit myself for money.

F (59:45)

Oh, geez, don't look.

B (59:47)

Point well made, Josh. Nice.

E (59:49)

You like that, Steven?

B (59:51)

I do. Not in any way.

F (59:53)

The leg kick was higher.

B (59:54)

So here's. And hopefully that kind of illustrates the point. You can go check out the references. We make them available every show, 11am weekdays. Here's a litmus test. Because I also understand as Christians, we believe that people can be redeemed and we want people to be redeemed. Right. You see the same rash of former porn stars who once they start aging out or once they become less popular, all of a sudden starting up ministries. It doesn't mean that it can't be genuine, but they needn't be given a platform. It doesn't mean that these women in those cases, most of them are not. But these women can't be genuine in maybe their conversion, but they needn't be granted a marriage certificate. Here's how I think you might want to approach both from a male perspective and a female perspective in self examination. Assuming that you are a man who wants a marriage, who wants a family, a traditional one, and assuming that you are a woman who wants those things. Now look for listen for asks and me meaning someone saying yeah, I went to college and I did all these things, but then I realized that I don't really want to be working and I actually would really like to be a mom. And actually that does sound better, right? Being at home and taking care of a family, that would be preferable now. So I was wrong in what I thought I wanted. Those are all asks and usually it's married with. But whatever women want to do, of course they can just do that versus I made mistakes following the feminist lie. I bought into it and in buying into it I did irreparable damage. And I want to right those wrongs and advise young women to not do the same. I want to make sure that we teach our children that everything is a trade off. I want to make sure that if we have a daughter, she knows that if you don't start focusing on this very young, when you have that biological window and start planning for your life, you may find yourself very likely find yourself in this situation with regrets like I did. Do not do it the way that I did. You can choose to be a professional during your fertile your formative years or you can choose to pursue a priority of a family and then you could go be a professional after that. But you do have to make a choice as to your priorities. It's a trade off. On the flip side, men don't get a trade off. Just so you know, here's the advice to young men. Hey, do you want to get married? You better work. And if you never want to get married, you still have to work. So look for is this person now selfishly, for lack of a better word, describing what they want. Is it a wish list? And the wish list has just changed from I want to be independent, I want to have my own money, I want to do it my own way, I don't want to be tied down to a man to you know what? Now I'm ready to settle down. That sounds good for me. Or is it someone just like anyone else who's made a serious mistake? Take a drug addict. Take someone who, for example, maybe was preaching what they now know to be a false religion. You have those people, those conversion stories saying, hey, hey, let me warn you, don't do what I did. It doesn't end well and it is all wrong. That's important because you know what else men here, and I'm telling you this, women. This is for the women. You know what men hear when they go, yeah, well then I do eventually want to be like a stay at home mom. But before then I want to work a job. And by the way, that makes sense. You can plan your life that way. A lot of people get married and before they have kids, they both work. But establishing that as a prerequisite is to tell the man, yeah, then I'll prioritize kids. I'm going to prioritize myself. And then children. At no point will it be support for you. And men are going, I'm kind of okay by myself. I would really only bring someone on if they're a teammate. And not just a teammate to the kids, but a teammate to me. You comment below if that helps you and makes sense. If someone has a conversion story, it can't just be a wish list. It has to be a how they are going to prevent other people from making the same mistakes. That's the accountability. We're gonna talk about that and more. Probably take quite a few chats on that join Rumble Premium. You can click right there. We're gonna go on for another 45 minutes to an hour here today you always get the not tomorrow cause it's good Friday, but Friday show as well. And it keeps the lights on. Or you know, you can always if you take a multivitamin, hey, take the best one in the world. That helps to keep the lights on too. Remember, April 10th, tickets available. Debate with Professor Zimmerman, PhD. Should be a very easy night out for him. Let's go. Those who are not members, you'll go watch. Hailey Caronia. Brilliant.