Bondi Short Circuits at Epstein Testimony: Should Trump Replace Her? - Special Guest Salty Cracker

Summary

Podcast Summary: Louder with Crowder

Episode: "Bondi Short Circuits at Epstein Testimony: Should Trump Replace Her? - Special Guest Salty Cracker"
Date: February 12, 2026
Host: Steven Crowder
Special Guest: Salty Cracker

---

Episode Overview

In this explosive and fast-paced episode, Steven Crowder and his crew break down the latest political news and cultural happenings, taking particular aim at the performance of Pam Bondi regarding the Epstein testimony, and question whether Donald Trump should replace her. Special guest Salty Cracker joins to discuss cultural shifts, the state of alternative media, education, dating dynamics, and more. The tone is irreverent, politically incorrect, and unapologetically comedic, blending satire with serious critique across a range of controversial topics.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Pam Bondi and the Epstein Testimony Debacle

Starts ~18:00

• The crew reacts to Pam Bondi’s widely-criticized performance in her testimony regarding Jeffrey Epstein.

• Crowder calls Bondi "unintelligent and unprincipled" and openly advocates for her firing.

• Key points:

  • Bondi dodged questions directly about Epstein, focusing on unrelated positive economic statistics and repeatedly claimed victimhood when pressed by lawmakers.
  • The hosts highlight her “allergy to accountability” and her ineffective communication style.
  • Crowder contrasts her evasiveness with Marco Rubio’s clear and direct answers in comparable contexts.
  • The episode includes a montage of public figures and “Epstein survivors” teasing revelations about co-conspirators but never naming names, a practice the hosts strongly criticize as unhelpful and performative.
  • Elon Musk’s public offer to pay for the defense of whistleblowers in the Epstein case is mentioned as a possible catalyst for more transparency.

  Memorable Quote:

  • Crowder: “Pam Bondi is unintelligent, she’s unprincipled, and she should be fired. She’s not good at anything of note… She hasn’t cleaned house, she hasn’t answered questions. And yesterday at the hearing she also did the perpetual victimhood sort of feminism thing with ‘I’m constantly being interrupted.’” (18:00–19:00)

---

2. Dunkin’ Ad Controversy & Cultural Critique

Segment: 09:40–16:05

• The crew lampoons a new Dunkin’ (Donuts) ad featuring Megan Thee Stallion, criticizing its overt sexualization and targeting of new “urban markets.”

• The hosts compare the ad’s tone with older, more “wholesome” Dunkin’ spots, lamenting the shift away from “everyman” values.

• Discussion touches on the sexualization of mainstream advertising and its implications for children and family culture.

• Crowder clarifies he’s “not morally outraged,” but takes issue with “age-appropriate” content, drawing a line between adult comedy and national ad campaigns.

  Notable Quotes:

  • “I just miss commercials being made for basic white people. Easy. Owning a Dunkin’ Donuts. Time to make the donut.” — Crowder (13:09)
  • “You can only bombard people with that for so much until they go, well, this is my perception of the demographics in the commercial and demographics they’re marketing to. With squish.” — Crowder on cultural backlash (13:52)

---

3. Immigration, Demographic Change, and the UK’s Future

Begins ~31:06

• Crowder delves into heated debates regarding UK immigration, using recent comments about the country being “colonized by immigrants” as a springboard.

• He argues that objective descriptors—such as statistics about increased immigration and changing demographics—are now treated as hate speech, which he claims marks societal decline.

• The crew provides statistics:

  • UK’s Muslim population increased 44% (2011–2021), 25% of London schoolchildren are Muslim.
  • Migrants cost UK taxpayers £12 billion annually; whites are the only group with a net positive tax benefit.
  • MI5’s terror watch list: 39,000 out of 43,000 are Muslim; “one out of 100 Muslims in the UK are on the terror list.”

• Discussion includes comparison of historic versus current waves of immigration, with Crowder emphasizing cultural and security implications.

  Memorable Quotes:

  • “When objective descriptors are considered hate speech, your society is done because that means that you've been fractured from within.” — Crowder (31:30)
  • “If you say, well, why do you have to single out white? Because it is literally singled out statistically as the only net tax benefit. I didn't do it. And if you consider that hate speech, well, now objective descriptors are hate speech and your society will cease to exist.” — Crowder (38:34)

---

4. Salty Cracker Joins: Culture, Media, and Red Pilling

Starts 46:33

• Introduction to Salty Cracker:

  • Former California public school teacher.
  • Disillusioned by what he perceived as institutional cynicism and manipulation in education.
  • Left teaching after witnessing staff meetings that prioritized inconveniencing parents for leverage.

  Salty’s key points:

  • "We were having our meetings that you guys aren't able to see, we're talking about screwing you over... should we put furlough days on Monday or Friday? No, let's make the parents feel it." (47:34)
  • Became politically right-leaning after being “red pilled” by Obama-era disappointments and discovering alternative information sources online.

• State of Big Tech and Alt-Media:

  • Salty: "YouTube was the original ‘Rumble’; now they've become CNN."
  • Predicts continued growth for platforms like Rumble if mainstream tech censorship persists.

• Salty’s Take on Cultural “Flashpoints”:

  • The left destroys movements they attach themselves to (e.g., BLM, gay rights, now possibly Epstein survivors).
  • Praises Rumble and similar platforms for resisting government and corporate pressure to censor.

  Notable Moment:

  • “The left wing is bringing down these Epstein survivors... And now there is a crashing crescendo where people are sitting there going, shut up and release the list. And I'm sitting there going, you lefties, you have brought down rape survivors.” — Salty Cracker (52:09–53:32)

---

5. Feminism, Dating, and Gender Dynamics

Begins ~55:54

• Salty discusses the prevalence of interracial and cross-cultural relationships among right-wing men, including his own marriage to a Latina woman, to mock left-wing accusations of racism.

• Conversation about extreme ethnic prejudices observed within minority communities, especially in educational environments.

• Crowder and Salty critique feminist narratives about physical altercations in relationships, using a viral "self-defense" clip as an example of double standards.

• Both agree that modern dating is fraught for young men, in part because of unclear or unfair standards regarding physical boundaries and consent.

  Quotes:

  • “I couldn't imagine having to go into the dating pool these days. If my wife leaves me, I'm just going to be gay.” — Salty Cracker (62:29)
  • “This is why men are checking out of the dating pool.” — Crowder (59:56)
  • On school staff meetings: “The whole meeting is about how white people suck... Meanwhile, Asians are hurling horrific slurs at each other during the staff meeting.” — Salty (56:05)

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• "Pam Bondi is unintelligent, she’s unprincipled, and she should be fired..." — Crowder (18:00)
• "You can only bombard people with that for so much until they go, ‘Well, this is my perception of the demographics in the commercial and demographics they’re marketing to. With squish.’" — Crowder on Dunkin’ ad (13:52)
• "When objective descriptors are considered hate speech, your society is done..." — Crowder (31:30)
• "If you have information, stop teasing it and release it. Especially if it can help put people behind bars or if it could help prevent future victims." — Crowder on the Epstein file drama (26:58)
• "YouTube was the original ‘Rumble’; now they've become CNN." — Salty Cracker (50:38)
• "You lefties, you have brought down rape survivors." — Salty Cracker (53:32)
• "I couldn't imagine having to go into the dating pool these days. If my wife leaves me, I'm just going to be gay." — Salty Cracker (62:29)

---

Important Timestamps

• Pam Bondi and Epstein testimony critique: 18:00–27:00
• Dunkin’ Donuts/Megan Thee Stallion ad discussion: 09:40–16:05
• UK immigration debate & statistics: 31:06–44:50
• Salty Cracker interview begins: 46:33
• Education & red-pilling story: 47:34–49:59
• Commentary on feminism & dating: 55:54–63:04

---

Tone and Language

• The episode is highly satirical, sarcastic, and intentionally provocative, sticking closely to Crowder’s brand of politically incorrect humor.
• Both Crowder and Salty Cracker employ a dismissive tone toward mainstream narratives, progressive talking points, and prominent figures criticized for perceived incompetence or hypocrisy.
• The crew makes frequent in-jokes, pop culture references, and blends banter with blunt political commentary.

---

Conclusion

This episode of "Louder with Crowder" blends cultural critique, political analysis, and comedic irreverence to address major controversies: the government’s handling of the Epstein case (and the lack of actionable transparency), the evolution of American advertising toward sexualization, European immigration and demographic change, and the confusion permeating modern gender and dating dynamics. Special guest Salty Cracker provides an insider’s perspective on education, alternative media, and the collapse—or at least the co-opting—of once-popular social movements. The episode is useful for fans seeking an unfiltered, anti-mainstream take on current events and culture wars.

---

Transcript

[Gerald]

Marketing is hard, but I'll tell you a little secret. It doesn't have to be. Let me point something out. You're listening to a podcast right now and it's great. You love the host. You seek it out and download it. You listen to it while driving, working out, cooking, even going to the bathroom. Podcasts are a pretty close companion. And this is a podcast ad. Did I get your attention? You can reach great listeners like yourself with podcast advertising from Libsyn Ads. Choose from hundreds of top podcasts offering host endorsements or run a pre produced ad like this one across thousands of shows to reach your target audience audience in their favorite podcasts with Libsyn ads go to Libsynads.com that's L I B S Y N ads.com today.

[Host]

Welcome live here to Rumble. Of course we're here 11am Eastern and each show rolls on into the next. It's all free. Plus if you join Premium, you get to watch an extra hour and 100% more show. Glad to be with you. Today we actually, we have a guest. I can't believe it's the first time we've had him on Salty Cracker. Salty. Some people refer to him as sodium honky. Guys don't laugh at that. I feel like my soul just died a little bit. But glad to have him on. And we're also going to be talking about Pam. Look, Pam Bondi is an unintelligent and unprincipled person and she should be fired. I'll go through what took place yesterday and where we are with the Epstein situation. It is a debacle. You have to look at this objectively and Dunkin Donuts and Megan Thee Stallion. There's a new ad that caught my attention. We're gonna run it for you and I don't wanna say it's representative of a carnal and hypersexualized people. Sometimes I do miss just like good old white commercials. Speaking of which, James Van Der Beek passed away yesterday. That was obviously trending everywhere. And you know what? I don't know his politics. Seemed like a really decent guy, very large family. Also seemed to have a good sense of humor about himself. And I was following him for a little bit. I know he was doing pretty well for a while, so that's really sad. And we thought, hey, today's a good day to bring out an oldie. We did an intro, one of those shows that I didn't grow up on. But I dated a girl who really loved this show. So I kind of know about it like I feel like. Oh, I still go Pacey. What are you thinking? Dawson's Creek? Enjoy the intro.

[Guest 1]

I don't want to wait for the show to be over I want to know just how it be I don't want to wait for the show to be over.

[Host]

Can't believe it. Yeah.

[Guest 2]

Can you believe Jack has aids?

[Host]

Yes. God yes. He has sex with like every guy.

[Guest 2]

The time.

[Host]

Click Rumble Premium and join now for 99 annually or 9.99amonth to get the entirely ad free experience and an ever expanding roster of content creators and free speec. Spider. Josh, what are you doing?

[Gerald]

Secure my financial future, Gerald. What does it look like?

[Guest 2]

Looks like you're standing in cold water.

[Gerald]

N. I just peed.

[Guest 2]

Gross. Why?

[Gerald]

Cuz I had some iced tea.

[Host]

No, Josh.

[Guest 2]

Why are you in the water?

[Gerald]

Panning for gold, Gerald. It's the best investment you can make. Something crazy goes on with the economy. Bitcoin crashes, US dollar fails. I've got the good stuff right here.

[Host]

Gold. Shut up, Gerald. You're gonna give away my spot.

[Gerald]

Everyone's gonna know where the good gold is.

[Guest 2]

Just relax and call Trugold Republic, okay? Or go to the website lwcgold.com if any of that stuff happens with the market, be protected. Just see if you qualify for a no fees for life. Iraq?

[Gerald]

Really?

[Host]

That easy?

[Guest 2]

Yes, it's very simple. So get out of the water, save your back, stop peeing in your pants.

[Gerald]

Well, these are your pants technically, but I borrowed. I can wash them in the river.

[Guest 2]

It's I think most in my pants again.

[Gerald]

Well, I think most of the peas gone from the river now. The stream's going that way. So let true Gold Republic help you safeguard your retirement with physical gold and silver. Go to lwcgold.com or call 800-628-4653. Sign up or call today and see if you qualify for a no fees for life Ira.

[Guest 2]

Josh.

[Host]

All right. Glad to be with you. We're running a little late because we, you know, we want to do that as tribute there James Vanderbeek. We haven't run that in a long time. I grew up with more with the oc. We did a parody of that too and boy, that dropped off after the first season. We have Salty Cracker so I can't take too long. Let me ask you a quick question of the day. Why do you think President Trump won't just fire Pam Bondi like it's his thing and she deserves it. Yeah, what happened to that?

[Gerald]

He used to love that.

[Host]

I Don't know.

[Gerald]

He used to love firing people. It was like.

[Host]

I think because if you watch in her hearing, she goes like. And Donald Trump, who is the best president in the history of ever. And he's like, that's good. I like that she said that I.

[Guest 2]

Was gonna fire her.

[Host]

And his penis is almost as big as Matt Nodlin's. Thanks for using my legal name.

[Guest 1]

All right.

[Host]

Sorry, Noodles, but we're not sorry.

[Guest 2]

You're welcome.

[Gerald]

Hey, what do you want me drag that thing around all day?

[Host]

I gotta say something about it. No wonder Mrs. Noodles is always smiling ear to ear.

[Guest 2]

Geez.

[Host]

Captain Morgan, CEO. How are you, sir? Fantastic.

[Guest 2]

How are you?

[Host]

Not as good as Noodles.

[Salty Cracker]

No, none of us.

[Host]

No.

[Gerald]

Or Mrs. Noodles.

[Host]

She's doing Fant And Valentine's Day. That's this. This weekend, February 14th. IRV Theater in Dallas, Texas. Go see him live. Show him some Valentine's Day love. Josh Firestein.

[Gerald]

I might have a mustache for that show.

[Guest 2]

What?

[Host]

Oh, that's right. I might. We have a series of commercials to tape.

[Gerald]

Yeah, so we'll see.

[Host]

It involves Josh with Civil War sideburns and a comically large iron cross. That's all set.

[Guest 1]

We'll see.

[Host]

We'll see. I woke up laughing at the prop of the comically large iron cross.

[Guest 2]

Which sponsor are we losing this week?

[Host]

Oh, come on. It's just a part of the fun.

[Gerald]

You'll have to catch me. You have to catch me and hold me down and shave this thing off. I'll be oiled up.

[Host]

Leaves the blood on the blade. Name that movie line sanitary. Leave the blood on the blade. The sodium in the blood. Guaranteed to oxidize the metal and leave pits and rust.

[Gerald]

We don't know what AIDS are yet.

[Host]

So That's a kill. HIV's a wound.

[Guest 2]

Spoiler.

[Host]

Speaking of fun, you guys can name that movie Speaking of fun. The best among us. Of course, we're not worthy. It's time for Black History Month. They do this a lot?

[Gerald]

I don't think they do.

[Host]

I don't think they do either. But we'll get to Duncan. Come on. So we want to give you some fast facts. Because, you know, to. To. To understand. To have not is to appreciate. Black History Month was first recognized by President gerald ford in 1976. Oh, cool. Also, his library is comically small.

[Gerald]

And his wife is not comically gorgeous.

[Host]

She is quite old.

[Gerald]

Betty Ford was so much.

[Host]

He was a good looking guy too.

[Gerald]

Yeah. Yeah. If you're into guys.

[Host]

Grand Rapids. Anyone from there. You know, it's like the Gerald Ford Presidential Library. It's shaped like a slice of pizza. And because there's nothing, there's really nothing to get to. And at the end, it's like an Elvis exhibit. You're like, what is happening here?

[Gerald]

There's a sign that says no outside.

[Host]

Food or drink, which is ridiculous. That's because they want to funnel you into their Hard Rock Cafe. Again. They're really scraping. Another fact. Ten years later, Congress passed it into law.

[Guest 2]

Yeah.

[Host]

And ten years after that, Tickle Tickle Me Elmo was released and became the number one holiday gift, beating out the competing Leave me for a pack of cigarettes. Well, sorry. Leave me for a pack of cools. Jerome. That was. Yeah. Which brings us to pandering acceptable crickets.

[Guest 1]

Dad.

[Host]

Duncan. I was sitting there with my. My woman. I said that yesterday, by the way. And you know, because some women were like, don't say you're a woman. And I said, I guarantee you she liked. While I was. She was here outside in the studio when I talked about my woman and, you know, making sure I mark my territory. Nothing sexual, by the way. Just like putting my arm around her. She got so, so hot and bothered. She hit her head in the fridge. She was reaching in for a Dr. And hit her head in the freezer. She's like, so judge me if you want to, but she's okay with it. Duncan. I was watching television. Well, not television, watching a subscription service with my, My. My woman. And now, of course you pay. You pay for subscriptions, but you get all kinds of non skippable ads. At least you know, you used to be able to record them and fast forward with TiVo. But we're going backwards, so I don't know the deal. This Duncan ad came on and, and my lady and I were silent for like a good 30 seconds because the next ad played and had finished. And I turned and said, did you just see what I said? She's like, yeah. I'm like, is Duncan. Is Duncan going? Are they like less than Popeyes now? Is that what's happening? Like, this was really. This was bizarre. So I guess they're going for a new urban market according to their strategy. And it features Megan the Stallion. If you have kids, they shouldn't be watching the show anyway, but this will be run on primetime. Here's the new Dunkin ad and see if you can spot some of the problems and how it's different from ads in the past.

[Guest 1]

What's up, hotties? It's time to grab those protein refreshers and start pumping Reach out and sip. Yeah, you taste that? Okay, ladies, now swirl, swirl, swirl that mango. Get that strawberry. It's time to target the muscles that matter the most. Your sip muscles. And sip and sip and sip and sip.

[Host]

Your mouth muscles are the most new protein refreshers only at Dunkin. Yeah, and that's the short version. The long version is even worse because you. I mean obviously you see the thong backs, but that's not the biggest issue. Did you notice something? Now keep in mind, Megan, thee stallion was part of wap. You guys know what that is for? And I like, look, whatever. When she does the splits. I didn't notice the first time. This, we didn't add this. They include a squish sound.

[Gerald]

Did they add that or does it.

[Host]

Just make that sound? I don't know. And you guys tell me, look, you. I know people say, oh, I've heard of white people being out of touch with black culture, but this is just ridiculous. And at a certain point, what is ah mean? What does that mean? Like I've, look, I've googled it. I asked AI. There's really only one implication from what I can. But you tell me what a split with a squish and what that means. I just, I will.

[Gerald]

I believe it means, look, I finished my meal.

[Host]

Yes. It means go to Starbucks. Yes, that's what it means. I will say, fine, you want to go after that market. But the Dunkin was a brand built on. It was the everyman. Right. It was built for people who were nine to five workers in the northeast, largely big in Boston. That was who made Duncan successful, was non pretentious. And now we switch that with squish. I just, I miss commercials being made for basic white people. Easy. Owning a Dunkin Donuts. Time to make the donut. Because unlike most supermarkets, we make up to 52 varieties fresh day and night. Of course, when you make donuts this way, there's a reward. People buy a lot of them. Good morning, folks. Yeah, look for Dunkin Donuts money saving coupon in your local newspaper. Look, they even use the word treats. Aww, that's for kids. It's like treats. Yeah, you got a treat squish. And then look, you were saying, oh, again, imagine people watching is going, this seems like a very carnal, fleshly culture. That's what a very lustful culture. And this doesn't seem quite family friendly. You can only bombard people with that for so much until they go, well, this is my perception of the demographics in the commercial and demographics they're Marketing to. With Squish.

[Gerald]

I figured it out.

[Guest 2]

You did?

[Host]

It's a haka dance. That's what it must be. Yeah. I don't know if she has that in her background. And I mean, this is. They want a new market. I guess that the people they're targeting couldn't go to one of those Korean donut shops we have in Texas for obvious reasons.

[Gerald]

That's great form.

[Host]

I hope you do that for the rest of the day. And keep in mind, like, this is. It's the Christian right who are defending Hooters right to exist. Because they're going like, look, they have the right. This is. But this is a setting where people. You don't want to be thrusting this in front of everyone. And children. We know what it means. And if, by the way, you think the commercial itself was bad, wait until you hear it with the original audio. It. That's the magic of filmmaking. I gotta see it. That's gold. I say also go to lwcgold.com or call 1-800-628-4653. See if you qualify for a no fees for life IRA. Wonderful sponsor and aligned with what we do here. They're not telling you buy. Buy nothing but gold. There's an A. Make it part of your diversified portfol.

[Guest 2]

Just stay away from Duncan stock, I guess.

[Host]

Yeah, I guess. After today, Old Republic, let Duncan know, go watch it on. You can go watch on one of the social media. Let them know what you think. Keep in mind, Duncan is part of the Diageo. Right where. Yeah, he said they. They will actually forbid any advertising on Rumble unless Rumble removes yours truly. And Rumble stood their ground strong. I used to like. I used to like Duncan.

[Guest 2]

You had a lot of points.

[Host]

I had a lot of points.

[Guest 2]

You let them go.

[Host]

No, I used them all up because then I'm stealing from them and then.

[Guest 2]

That's right.

[Host]

And then I shut it.

[Guest 2]

Then you shut it off.

[Gerald]

I heard they're changing their slogan two.

[Host]

What is it, Josh? You want to share with the class? America comes on. Now. Here's the difference. Here's the difference. People be like, you really think that you should be. I'm not morally outraged. I'm just talking about age appropriate. And people say, well, you had a giant. You had a dildo shark as a parody of a Jaws trailer. Do you think that children should see that? Absolutely not. No, of course not. I am not suggesting that this be run as an ad on the Super Bowl. We're making fun of the degeneracy because you need to know as a parent, the world toward which you are facing your children.

[Gerald]

Yeah, we're not running this in commercial breaks for Zootopia.

[Host]

Exactly. Which one's one with the penguins? That's Madagascar.

[Gerald]

That's Madagascar.

[Host]

A lot of adult references, which I appreciate, but finally something I can enjoy.

[Gerald]

They're incognito. Yeah, the kids have no clue.

[Host]

Speaking of incognito, someone who's not great with that Jeffrey Epstein and his complicit. Nice segue. Look, here's the thing with Jeffrey Epp, because you guys have asked us to and we have covered it, and hopefully that segment, that was the beginning, middle and end. Everything that we know was helpful. Please go check it out. What I don't want to do is exactly what these people, those who I'm about to present, are doing. If you have information, if you have names, if there is something shocking, then provide it. Otherwise, shut up. And it seems like clout chasing and it's constant teasing and we don't believe you anymore. We'll get to that montage, including people like Nancy Mace and others. But Pam Bondi, yesterday, she was live and I didn't have the stomach for it. Let me be really clear about. I've never been a fan. We didn't cover her hearing because before any of this went down, I thought she was going to be a disaster. Pam Bondi is unintelligent, she's unprincipled and she should be fired. She's not good at anything of note. She's really not. She's not a good communicator. She's not effective in policy making at all. And I know she's. Obviously, it's different as a head of the doj, but certainly as far as the policies within that department, she hasn't cleaned house, she hasn't answered questions. And yesterday at the hearing, she also did the perpetual victimhood sort of feminism thing with. I'm constantly being interrupted. Well, I will tell you, I have to call balls and strikes. She wasn't answering questions and it looked quite foolish. It reflected poorly on this administration. She needs to go. Case in point. Listen to her testimony.

[Guest 1]

They are talking about Epstein today.

[Host]

Correct?

[Guest 1]

This has been around since the Obama administration. This administration released over 3 million pages of documents. Over 3 million. And Donald Trump signed that law to release all of those documents.

[Host]

Okay?

[Guest 1]

He is the most transparent president, okay, so far in the nation's history.

[Host]

All right?

[Guest 1]

And none of them, none of them ask Merrick Garland. Over the last four years, one word about Jeffrey Epstein. How Ironic is that. You know why? Because Donald Trump. The Dow. The Dow right now is over checks, notes. The dow is over 50,000. I don't know. Laughing. You're a great stock trader. As I hear. Raskin. The dow is over 50,000 right now. The S&P at almost 7,000.

[Host]

What?

[Guest 1]

And the NASDAQ smashing records. Americans 401ks and retirement savings are booming. That's what we should be talking about. We should be talking about making Americans safe. We should be talking about what does a Dow have to do with anything. That's what they just asked.

[Host]

Answer. Are you kidding? That's not an answer.

[Gerald]

Good question.

[Guest 1]

Shattered 50,000 for the first time. This is crazy. They said it couldn't be done in four years, yet President Trump has done it in one year. National median rents have fallen to a four year low, thanks to Donald Trump. That's why they want to focus on Epstein and our most transparent president in the nation's history.

[Host]

Oh, you must think you're like Treasury Secretary. I thought her department was doj.

[Guest 2]

Yeah.

[Host]

So they were asking. Here's the thing. They were asking you appropriate questions for the doj. You answered them as though the DOJ isn't under your control, isn't under your purview. This just seems like an allergy to accountability. It does make more sense when you understand that she was using notes from Scott Besant. So that makes. Yes, that's. Newsom's a fairy. People on audio. That makes no sense. But it's a live show. 11am so tune and watch the. The video at 11am weekdays. She also went on to show you exactly how to not be taken seriously. But more importantly, this is something that people like Andrew Wilson talk about. She may not identify as a feminist. It's the COVID feminism of using the tactic of I'm a victim. I can't believe you won't let me finish. And here's the thing. There's an appropriate time to bring that up if you are answering the questions appropriately. She wasn't. It's about as bad as abroad. On the whatever podcast.

[Guest 1]

I could have finished my answer. There were more than 500 attorneys and reviewers who assisted with the.

[Host]

That answers my question.

[Guest 1]

They don't want an answer.

[Host]

That answers my question. Ma'. Am.

[Guest 1]

All victims of the victims are protected. You are protected under. Do you want me to answer or do you want to interrupt? I believe Wexner's name was listed more than 4,000 times about.

[Host]

I had.

[Salty Cracker]

Yeah, I already told you that.

[Gerald]

This is where he's listed as A focus.

[Guest 1]

My answer. Come on. Let me finish my answer. We corrected that.

[Gerald]

Come on.

[Guest 1]

40 minutes. He was already. You're acting like everybody's trying to cover up Wexner's name.

[Host]

Reclaiming. Reclaiming my time.

[Guest 1]

Answer this question.

[Host]

Reclaiming my time.

[Guest 1]

He was.

[Host]

Mr. Chairman.

[Guest 1]

How this works. Chairman kind of is how it works, and I need to give my answer on that.

[Host]

These are obvious, obviously, improper redactions.

[Guest 1]

I'm talking. If they're not privileged.

[Guest 2]

Quiet.

[Guest 1]

Don't yell at me. If they're not.

[Host]

This is on your time.

[Salty Cracker]

It's not on.

[Host]

Mr. Goldman, even though you used your improper redaction.

[Guest 1]

You'll like my answer now.

[Host]

And by the way, it's a valid point to say. Yeah, well, there's grandstanding, and they're. They're filibustering and talking for a very long time. Sure, sure. But we have a contrast as to how you can deal with that effectively. And it's not. Don't talk to me that way. Let me go on and discuss the Dow. When you ask me about Epstein, let me show you how you can handle it thoughtfully, in a controlled manner. That's very effective. I present to you most improved player, Marco Rubio.

[Guest 1]

I worry that you are playing fast and loose with our nation.

[Host]

Well, I just gave you testimony here.

[Guest 1]

I just want to conclude by saying.

[Host]

Yeah, but I just gave you testimony of how well things are moving forward. Not as fast as they are. But you also said that in six.

[Guest 1]

Or nine months, if things don't go well, you're gonna have to do something else. And the president's said that he's not ruled out the military option. And you've also just said that, yes, we are at war. The president has worked.

[Host]

Every president retained the power to use military.

[Guest 1]

For me to ask you.

[Host]

And I gave you a very specific example. Every president retains the right to defend the United States against an imminent threat. Yes. If there are Iranian. Just give you an example. Iranian drones deployed in Venezuela that could threaten the United States. We most certainly will address that, even if it's located in Venezuela. But we hope we don't get to that point. We don't expect to get. I don't think that we're not trending in that direction.

[Guest 2]

That's a fact.

[Host]

See?

[Guest 2]

Perfect. There you go.

[Host]

You answer the question. Keep a very specific example. And when they try and redirect. And you go, no, hold on. I did answer it. Very specific example. Not, hey, can I. Don't. Don't talk to me that way. Let's talk about The S and P. It just.

[Guest 2]

And one thing that she said, I want to address this because she's like the Democrats. That's a fair point. The Democrats didn't bring this up. But do not act like they are the only one asking questions now. Your entire right flank is asking questions right now that you need to answer. Stop acting like this is just political theater on the questions.

[Host]

Right.

[Guest 2]

And start answering what is actually going on and who is going to be charged.

[Host]

And I know what many. Well, you're going to say, well, you guys have pointed out the hypocrisy. Sure, we have. Because it's Pam Bondi's job to answer for the actions being taken now. That is her job. That's why she's there. The key issue here, she's not actually doing her job and she's playing victim when people call her both left and right on her not doing her job appropriately and just as unhelpful as Bondi is, or I should say are all of these people, and I don't want to use the term grifters, but people who go, I've seen the unredacted and oh my gosh, boy, wait until you see what I have for you. The constant tease of potential will they, won't they? Names on the list with no follow up.

[Guest 1]

You would be shocked, Pierce, at some of the names that I've seen that came across the doj.

[Gerald]

So happy to be there.

[Host]

DOJ is protecting and we're talking about.

[Guest 1]

People on both sides of the aisle. We're talking about famous people, rich people, people in power, prime ministers, former presidents, et cetera, media personalities that are named in these files.

[Guest 2]

Congresswoman, are you among the members who got to see the unredacted files today?

[Guest 1]

Yes, I saw some of them, not all of them, obviously. And I'll be going back tomorrow to see more.

[Guest 2]

Any reaction on what you've seen so far?

[Guest 1]

I think that there's folks who are definitely implicated in co conspirators. Let me announce now, several of us Epstein survivors have been discussing creating our own list of names.

[Host]

Five months, huh?

[Guest 1]

We know the names.

[Host]

How long does it take to make a list?

[Guest 1]

Many were abused by them.

[Gerald]

Got to figure out how to use.

[Guest 1]

Microsoft Excel together as survivors. We will confidentially compile the names. We all know we're regularly in the Epstein world. I can tell you that I have a whole list of documents, including documents that include the name of potential co conspirators and perpetrators. Our press secretary and our Department of Justice and other government officials saying they're moving on from this.

[Host]

I wish that we could. Okay, now let me be really clear before I get to the people getting ahead of it. The public interest in this case is unbelievably strong. The victims will be fine in the court of public opinion, and they will be protected legally. Many people have offered to assist them if they reveal their abusers. Here's the thing. You have names in these files that are public of people who were invited, let's say, to Epstein's house once. Didn't know who he was. Showed up for dinner, showed up for a party. You have victims names that were revealed, but not those who were repeat visitors with intimate relationships. The redactions aren't consistent. That's why the public will, of course, side with these people if they provide viable information. And remember, Elon offered to defend anyone who reveals the truth. He wrote this on X. He wrote, I will pay for the defense of anyone who speaks the truth about this and is sued for doing so. So you have legal protection. You will not be villainized in the court of public opinion. If you have this information, stop teasing it and release it. Especially if it can help put people behind bars or if it could help prevent future victims. That being said, we have some suspicions as to who may be involved because some suspects are trying to clearly get ahead of the accusations. And what did you do to celebrate? Oh, me had a big party on Little St. James, you know, with all my friends Elmo and Big Bird and of course, just Jeffrey Epstein. Funny, Epstein. You can't just drop that Mr. Monster right from the mouth of a monster. Yeah, you can't just drop. You gotta. You gotta follow up on it. He's into it.

[Gerald]

He can't do that on Good Morning Britain.

[Host]

No, that's not fair. Also, speaking of which, you know, many of these ladies who unfortunately were trafficked, some of them were involved in this work. And it starts with the poll, which is why we discourage everyone from engage in that. And we won't. We don't take your. We don't take super chats from you where you stuff a dollar bill, you know, in our. Our dungarees or under roofs. But we do know that you need affection, especially in this era of disconnected social media. You need a little love. So we do treat you like the love thing. It's time for reverse super chat. And today the folks at Rumble wallet are gifting 53 rumble premium subscriptions in the chat. 50 free. If you were just gifted one. You can message me, tag me on X or on Instagram, you can download the Rumble Wallet, and you can step away from big banks. You can tip creators. There's. I don't even know the full breadth.

[Guest 2]

Of it, because you can buy Bitcoin. You can. I think you can buy some other stuff on there, too.

[Host]

It eliminates the middleman where it allows you to, you know, have it in one place securely. Yeah. Also not only with your creators, but also use it, like, as your own little personal bank, which I kind of thought you had with your phone. But this is better.

[Guest 2]

It's better because they can't cancel you. Yeah. Oh, you can't be debanked, and you can't, like, PayPal or anything.

[Host]

You can't.

[Guest 2]

Don't have to worry about any of.

[Host]

That crap, even if you have to work your way through college. That's why we gift you. This has been Reverse Super Chat. All right. I know that we have a salty cracker on in a little bit, so. Mr. Cracker. Mr. Cracker. I apologize.

[Gerald]

That's. Is he related to Uncle Cracker?

[Guest 2]

Some respect on.

[Host]

Oh, my gosh. I forgot about them.

[Gerald]

Yeah, Uncle Cracker, man.

[Guest 2]

Nah, that's not him.

[Host]

What was the Uncle Cracker song? I'm trying to. What was their song?

[Gerald]

Oh, dude, don't put me on the spot.

[Host]

What was the big Uncle Cracker song? It was smile. I'm trying. I'm thinking about Smash Mouth. I know it's not Smash Mouth, but they kind of look like Smash Mouth, didn't they? Uncle Cracker, The Guy Fieri. Smash Mouth, Uncle Cracker.

[Gerald]

They were douchey white guys with spiky hair for sure.

[Host]

Ah, it's gonna. Ah, dude. Now I can.

[Salty Cracker]

Give me the people to clear my soul. Is that him? Did he do that cover?

[Host]

Was that him?

[Guest 2]

I think he did that cover.

[Host]

I might be wrong. Okay, sorry. I've gotten sidetracked. Yes, he did cover Drift Away, but what did he do that was original? Noodles? All that blood is in your brain.

[Gerald]

When you go swimming, does your noodle.

[Host]

Drip come away from you? Oh, come on. Noodle bites.

[Gerald]

All right.

[Host]

I want to travel.

[Guest 2]

You need a floaty. No, I'm covered.

[Host]

Guys, I got to start this clean. Sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry. And then we can. Then we can do all the silly stuff.

[Guest 2]

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

[Host]

So England is a stupid place. And England is pretty much done. We've talked about that. Piers Morgan. I've been on his show. We're friendly. We disagree on a whole lot. He is wrong in his outrage, offense, descriptors, whatever you want to call it in responding to this. So let me tell you why England is done and that if the left had their way here, we would be done for the same reason. Listen, when objective descriptors are considered hate speech, your society is over. Meaning we haven't gotten to the point of prescriptions. Right. We haven't gotten to the point of, okay, here is the problem. Here's how we deal with it. That's where we should be disagreeing. Generally speaking, we do need to be able to have a shared common language in descriptors of a problem. So when terms like immigrants or for example, overrun or unsustainable or increased crime, when objective descriptors, over which there can be no debate as far as their accuracy, when they are considered hate speech, your society is done because that means that you've been fractured from within. That brings us to the story that involves, I mean, British billionaires Keir Starmer, Manchester United, Piers Morgan, as I mentioned. So the Manchester United States and co owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe. He made the statement that the UK has been colonized by immigrants. And all he was pointing out was a statistical reality. And keep in mind, it's not lost on me, he says 2020 when he means to say 2000 in this clip. At the moment, I don't think the economy's any good. You can't afford. You can't have an economy with 9 million people on benefits and huge levels of immigrants coming in. I mean, the UK is being colonized. It's costing too much money. It will cause colonized. It'll cold. Well, yeah, the UK has been colonized by immigrants, really, isn't it? I mean, the population of the UK was 58 million in 2020. Now it's 70 million 2000. That's 12 million people. You met recently with Nigel Faros, didn't you? I did. Do you think that they would be a kind of a good government if they were to win the next election? I think Nigel is an intelligent man and I think he's got good intentions. But in a way, you could say exactly the same about Kiev when Kia came in. Totally sensible answer. Now, the left uses the term colonized all the time, right. And what they really mean is the most recent successful civilization because I don't know if you know this, you would apply that same terminology to many Native American tribes who enslaved others and took over their land. When he's describing it accurately and by the way, being quite respectful of people over whom he's been critical in the past, you'd think, okay, yeah, this is an opinion based on an objective fact. Now we can get the prescription and see where people disagree. Instead, Ratcliffe's words were treated as though they were the worst thing that has ever happened since the Blitzkrieg.

[Guest 1]

But what Jim said was unacceptable. It was disgusting, frankly, and he should apologise for his remarks.

[Host]

The Mayor of Manchester, Andy Burnham, has come out to say his comments go against everything for which Manchester has traditionally stood. A place where people of all races and faiths have pulled together to build our city and our institutions, including Manchester United fc.

[Guest 1]

Racism. The red card has put this out on social media, saying language of this kind echoes narratives that have historically been used to stigmatize migrant communities, fuel division and legitimize hostility towards minority groups. At a time when hate crime is rising and communities are feeling increasingly unsafe, public figures must recognize the weight and consequences of their words. We've got yet another billionaire who wants people to think that immigrants are the problem and not billionaires like himself.

[Gerald]

Are there roaming billionaire rape gangs?

[Host]

Right, That I don't know about? Oh, no. Zuckerberg's got a summer quarters. Protect your arsehole. It's just. He gave you numbers.

[Guest 2]

Yeah.

[Host]

And then he used a term that's one of your favorite terms, those on the left to try and draw a comparison that you would understand. Numbers are now hate speech. The UK is done. So Keir Starmer added that offensive and wrong. Britain is a proud, tolerant and diverse country. Jim Ratcliffe should apologize for whatever. The English Football association is considering investigating whether Sir Jim Ratcliffe has brought the game into disrepute by claiming that the UK has been colonized by immigrants. Warrants investigation. It doesn't. And it's time for claim truth. First claim that you will hear all references available links in the description as we do every show. No, the UK isn't being invaded, guys. That's why it's offensive, because it's wrong. According to Piers Morgan on X, he wrote there are legitimate debates to be had about the levels of UK immigration too high and the number of people not working and claiming benefits also too high. But they can be had without descending to we've been overrun. Colonized by foreigners. Nonsense. We haven't. I'm in England and I know it's not been taken over by radical Muslims. Okay, here's the truth. England is being taken over.

[Guest 2]

Well, crap.

[Gerald]

Why does it have to be radical Muslims? Why can't it just be anybody? It could just be colonized.

[Host]

Is it could just be some of the 198 million Muslims who believe that violence as a means to political ends is justified against. It could just be those not radical, mainstream.

[Guest 2]

Some of them. Yeah, yeah.

[Host]

About 200 million. But if you look at the population, it's 3.9 million there. Okay. It increased 44% from 2011 to 2021.

[Gerald]

Wow.

[Guest 2]

Geez.

[Host]

25% of school age children in London are Muslim.

[Guest 2]

25.

[Host]

Combine that with a birth rate problem, one generation, that number becomes all of a sudden not a minority. It tips fast. And you know who else is saying that the UK has an Islamic extremist problem? No, not the United States. No, not Donald Trump. The government of the uae. They've officially restricted students from enrolling in UK universities due specifically to Islamist extremism. The. You get that? Just make sure you understand this. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. The UK's Muslim extremism is too much for the UAE to handle. Don't send your kids there. They could be radicalized. Sorry. Stelters on tv. And here's another truth, by the way. Yeah. I think that they don't have quite the same constitution that we do. So, you know, it's not like you cannot juxtapose Sharia law and our constitution. But. But let's just get to something objective here. This truth. These immigrants, beyond religion, beyond values. They're freeloaders. They're freeloaders. Migrants in the UK, they cost taxpayers $12 billion a year. So an example. 72% of Somalis in the UK live specifically in social housing. And in the UK, you say, why make it race? Because you guys did. In the uk, whites are the only group with a net positive tax benefit.

[Guest 2]

Son of a gun.

[Host]

UK whites, white people are the only group with a net positive tax benefit. So if you say, well, why do you have to. Why do you have to single out white? Because it is literally singled out statistically as the only net tax benefit. I didn't do it. And if you consider that hate speech, well, now objective descriptors are hate speech and your society will cease to exist. Pierce is nice guy, but wrong a fool on this because the UK is officially the new Pakistan. Time to make a fool of peers population. It's my dad's favorite band.

[Guest 2]

It's catchy, by the way.

[Host]

He.

[Guest 2]

He. Unless there's another conversation going on that he was commenting on. That's not what the Manchester United co owner said. He said immigrants. He didn't say Muslims.

[Host]

Piers.

[Guest 2]

Why did you go straight to Muslims?

[Host]

Right, yeah, he didn't.

[Gerald]

He didn't mention radical Muslims.

[Guest 2]

Yeah, I think you're seeing a problem that you're trying to defend against. You kind of outed yourself a little bit there, it seems.

[Host]

Yeah. And just to be clear, I don't want to play that game when I say I'm aiming to Muslims in the uk.

[Guest 2]

No, no, we do.

[Host]

Yeah, we do. In the United States we don't. It's a portion of it. But in the UK that's the problem.

[Guest 2]

Maybe there was another conversation. Yeah.

[Host]

By the way, that brings us to truth number three. So we've gone through. Yep. The demographic changes. Yes. The tax perils or budgetary perils. And the other one is many of these immigrants are. In fact, you hear this lie all the time that oh, immigrants are more law abiding than native born citizens. It's not true. They're menaces to society in the UK. So MI5 has a terror watch list. 39,000 out of 43 are Muslim. 43,000 total. 39,000 of which are Muslim.

[Guest 2]

Whoops.

[Host]

Let me give you another number. So you go, well, yeah, but that's not that many people. Right. Overall, 43,000 is a small sample size. Okay, let's give you a per capita number. One out of 100 Muslims in the UK are on the terror list.

[Gerald]

One out of 143,000 is an entire MLB stadium.

[Host]

Yeah, it's actually more than the entire fighting force of Hamas.

[Guest 2]

Well, they just transferred to the uk, just home base there now.

[Host]

So you have those objective stats. If those are hate speech, well then I'll speak a language that the left can understand. I'll give you the anecdotal you guys like to go to. That. Just this week there was an Afghan asylum seeker found guilty abducting and raping a 12 year old girl. Now when you combine that with a government that has a vested interest in hiding the activity of roaming grooming gangs, how bad do you think it really is? These are the official numbers from a government that we know has been found to be untrustworthy in their bias in trying to present migrants in a positive light. Think about that for a second and then let's just go to one other fact. People go, well, it's not that big of a number. You don't need a majority of the population to destroy a country. So let's just, let's use Britain as an example. During British rule of India, There are about 100,000 to 240,000 Brits depending on the numbers you use. They settled. There were 300 million Indians. The total British population never exceeded 0.1%. So colonization can happen with a Very, very small percentage of people there. They just have to be more effective. In this case, it's not that they are militarily effective. It's that we have a suicidal society. Who is silencing those sounding the alarm and who's left holding the bag? Who's left dealing with the consequences?

[Guest 1]

You.

[Host]

You in the uk, and it will be you here in the United States. I know people will say, oh, this is the same thing that happened with all generations. The Irish, well, first off, they had yellow fever. That was a problem. But Italian, no, it's not the same thing. Pre welfare state, post welfare state, very different. And an ideology that is based upon the idea of invading out, breeding. We've shown you clips where they say that quiet part out loud and subjugating a society, period. That is different. The Irish, the Italians, and I understand there were issues with Catholicism back then in the Vatican. That's not lost on me. We've discussed it. They weren't coming to the United States with the express purpose of subjugating the country. That's what a huge percentage of Islamic migrants in the UK are commanded to do according to their holy book. And they're a net drain on taxpayers. And they commit crimes at record levels. Let me ask you this. Do you believe. Let me ask you two questions. Do you believe that the government's job, assuming it's not corrupt, assuming you live in a westernized, free society, do you believe it's the government's job to act on behalf of its people? Is that its job? Not do they do it? Is that its job? Okay, the answer is yes. Question number two. We've seen the net negatives. Can anyone give me a net positive for the people of the uk? Not for the fields. We are the world globalism. Can anyone list me a net positive of this record influx of migrants?

[Gerald]

Well, that's why they claim you can't call it colonization.

[Host]

Right?

[Gerald]

Because according to their definition, colonization is when someone comes and makes the place better.

[Host]

Right? Yeah. Like the gays in Chelsea, by the way, I.

[Guest 2]

Do I need an admonishment? Actually, I was looking for an opening on piers where there wasn't one. I apologize.

[Host]

No, he was responding to.

[Guest 2]

Directly responding to Megyn Kelly directly in that one. And they were talking about Muslims. You still suck.

[Host]

It's okay.

[Guest 2]

So do Arsenal, so get over it.

[Host]

That's fair. That's fair. Listen, I'm talking about Muslims.

[Guest 2]

My bad. We are talking.

[Host]

We're talking about the United States. Sometimes I'm talking about, like, Venezuelans and stuff.

[Guest 2]

It was Such a problem that when India and Pakistan were getting a little feisty with one another, we were wondering when the war was going to break out in London because of the populations of those two groups in London. Yeah, giant number of people.

[Host]

That's what happens when you have people in your country who don't have skin in the game in your country. Yes, but they still have skin in the game in the old country.

[Guest 2]

That's the problem. Well, we're skinning the game in your country. And also, instead of protecting their citizens from, you know, rape gangs potentially and all the other stuff that we've seen going on over there, they're like, no, no, no, we have to defend these other people. Yeah, we're actually not. We're actively not defending our own citizens. We're prioritizing these other people.

[Host]

Yeah. So I'll just wrap it up with. Look, we all have different opinions, and I understand that people have different solutions, even amongst the right. But objective reality cannot become taboo. It can't become hate speech. We saw what happened with that during COVID during the 2020 election on YouTube, big tech platforms. We were demonetized. That's why we rely on support from people like you. Hey, if you want to, if we've earned it, click that button below. All the investigative journalism that we've done, we broadcast here every day with less than, what, a 50th of commercials of other places. Consider joining up. For $99 a year, you get a hand hatch mug or $9 a month. And it helps us keep the lights on. If not 11am weekdays, we are always here. Even on Friday. Even on Friday. Even if it's not broadcast wide. I do believe that we have our guest here on the program. Right. And this is the first time that we've had him, which actually kind of surprised me. But I know sometimes you just sort of. You just think you have. You're like, did I dream that? So we. Welcome to the show. More than a million followers across rumble and YouTube and quite popular. And some would say Salty. It's time for Salty Crack. All right, mister, could you bring him up? I can't see. There you go, Mr. Salty Cracker. It's Salty Cracker. The Salty Cracker on Rumble. Salty cracker on YouTube. Can you see me? Hear me, sir? Welcome to the show.

[Salty Cracker]

Hey, thanks for having me.

[Host]

I am glad to have. Is that Abraham Lincoln and Apollo Creed shorts? It's.

[Salty Cracker]

Yeah, The Abraham Lincoln in the background is kind of the co host of the show.

[Host]

Oh, okay. Very. He's just. He's really more of a motif at that point, but it is pretty cool. I won't have to tell my kids stories. Like, tell me stories about your childhood. I don't remember in bath time. So I just. I've been going through the entire Rocky saga lately.

[Guest 2]

Okay.

[Host]

I'm like, and do you know what Mickey said? He's like, what Mickey? He said, get up, you son of a bitch.

[Guest 2]

Oh, that's weird.

[Host]

My son's like, I don't know what this is. I'm like, yeah, wait till I tell you about Mr. T. But that's. That's tomorrow at bedtime. This is real. Yeah.

[Gerald]

I want to take a bath. It's going to be a great show.

[Host]

Yeah, exactly. Hey, Mr. Cracker. For people who are maybe new to you, and I know a lot of most of them have obviously seen you tell them your story, how you got into this. Mine was obviously a straighter path. I started as a comedian and so I just started doing YouTube. But you were a teacher in California. What made you say, like, you know what, I want to roast people online?

[Salty Cracker]

Well, I. Yeah, so I was a public school teacher. And everybody is kind of getting a glimpse now of what I was able to see when I was. When I was in there. We were holding these staff meetings and you got this profession that's portrayed as loving with their. All those. Those left wing platitudes that they love to hold. But meanwhile, when they're. When we're having our meetings that you guys aren't able to see, we're talking about screwing you over. And like, week.

[Host]

Yeah.

[Salty Cracker]

We were supposed to figure a pay cut. And they're like, well, let's. We're gonna be these. These days off that we have to take what that was called head days when the city can't pay for it anymore.

[Host]

Yeah.

[Salty Cracker]

And should we put it on Monday or Friday? Furlough. Yeah, furloughed. And they're like, no, let's put it on Wednesday and let's make the parents feel it. That you're gonna put it purposely on. That was. That was the minute that I snapped. I was watching this room full of teachers purposely planning to screw over all the people that pay us and we're using their kids. And I was like, I gotta get the hell out of this place. And so I just quit.

[Host]

Wow. And this was. You were referring to the true heroes, correct? I just want to make sure we're discussing the same people.

[Salty Cracker]

Yeah. The ones that choose love over hate.

[Host]

Correct? Yes. Yeah. Just want to make sure they have this, right. Because teachers, public school teachers as well as nurses are nothing if not true heroes. Is that, was that the moment that you get people use the term red pilled? Were you always more right leaning or. And then did you just snap, you had had enough? Or was that the moment where you said, you know, maybe I should look into all this stuff and, and realize it was a crock of shit?

[Salty Cracker]

Yeah, no, I don't know if that was the moment. I, I had been, I guess red pilled before then. I was one of these idiots who got suckered by Obama because I was watching. I, I had turned, I turned draft age right around 9 11. I was sitting there going, oh, I'm gonna, I'm gonna get sent to Afghanistan to fight Iraqis where Saudis attacked us. I was sitting there going, this isn't making any sense. And then Obama was like, well, we're not going to do that. And he made every, he did everything George Bush did and then he did it worse. And I was like, oh, this is a completely rigged game over here.

[Host]

Yeah.

[Salty Cracker]

And then that's how I started finding other, other information sources. And I was like, oh crap. Everything I know is stupid.

[Host]

Right? And that's the thing is you came in during that era. I mean, I think I was. YouTube was like 2006, but political stuff. 2009. But the ecosystem is totally different. I think this is something that a lot of people aren't aware of. Back then there wasn't really a need for a place for like Rumble or other alternatives because it was you too. But now it's just AI slop. And I know that's something that you've obviously championed for a while. Have you seen that transition and where do you think the ecosystem goes with. With sort of big tech platforms, the ones that are sort of, you know, placeholders right now.

[Salty Cracker]

Yeah, no, you're absolutely right. So in 2005, YouTube was the alternative to CNN and ABC. This is YouTube was the rumble and then they became CNN.

[Host]

Right.

[Salty Cracker]

And so places like Rumble are going to continue to see continued expansion and should these Democrats, if they're able to fortify another election, that clamping down that you saw in, in 2020, they're going to go right back to it. It's going to be even worse. And so these places like Rumble are hugely important and X and stuff like that. Places that aren't overly compromised and have a track record of telling entire countries to screw off when they're told to censor their content in those countries.

[Host]

Yeah, well, that's One thing I would say Rumble has a better track record than X with that. They just told, they told these countries, well, then, fine, sorry, Brazil, we're not going to be there. Like, all right, fine, Russia then. I guess you're not going to run us then. Okay, let me ask you, what do you think? Because we've seen these sort of transitions and I've seen so many people rise and fall, you know, been around. I've defied the clock at this point, so I'm happy, happy to be here. What do you think is the single biggest issue, like, most pivotal issue that maybe turns most people right now or has brought most people into the fold or you think will be a flashpoint moving forward? As far as a cultural shift, there's a lot out there. But does anything stick out to you right now, like this is the winning issue or this is the most important one?

[Salty Cracker]

Yeah, it's. It's hard to pick an issue because things are going crazy so fast and these different issues are popping up, up left and right. But you know, one thing that is a constant is that whatever the left attach itself to, they seem to destroy. And these are gigantic movements that had positive political momentum until these left hearts started grabbing onto them and hooking their teeth into it and dragging it down. And, and you're. You, you mentioned it a little bit earlier in the show, and I'm seeing it more and more, especially in the newsfeed today. The left wing is bringing down these Epstein survivors of a year ago when these people, these Epstein survivors, were on the steps of the Capitol and they were talking about how, you know, we need to get the Epstein files released and we need to get these people accountable. Everybody was on their side. And then they started making ads, and then they made a Super bowl ad and then they keep going out. They keep telling everybody that they got a list. And people were very tentative about pointing out that, why don't you release the list? Why don't you tell us who's on the list? And now there is a crashing crescendo where people are sitting there going, shut up and release or release the list. And I'm sitting there going, you lefties, you have brought down rape survivors.

[Host]

So, yeah, pretty much they've done this.

[Salty Cracker]

They destroyed blm. They destroyed. Look at, look at the homophobic slurs you're seeing all over the place that 20 year olds are all using. Well, that's because you lefties attach yourself to the gay movement and you drag them down.

[Host]

Yeah, yeah. Well, they destroy. They shoot themselves in the foot. But of course, before that, they try and take everything else down with them. I mean, I say, is there anything that you can look at and say, okay, Department of Education, is that successful? Obviously, you just touched on that. No, we look at feminism. That's a big one. Has that made women happier? No. Gen Z women, liberal Gen Z women, are more miserable than any group of people before them, and they're statistically dumber than generations before. For them, if you want to look at financial stability, you want to look at the family unit, anything, anything that you can look at objectively. You have a generation of people who've grown up under this experiment. They are fatter, sicker, dumber, more mentally unwell. And the left has had control over all of these institutions throughout the entire rearing of this generation. The results are in.

[Salty Cracker]

Yeah, it's undisputable at this point. Yeah, completely.

[Host]

And then I wanted to ask you, because this is something, and forgive me if it's. But I think this is well known and your wife has been, you know, laying the brain, has been dealing with him. Our producer has been dealing with your missus. She is Latina, which is quite common, I will say, for many people on the right. I mean, Tim Toulman, my woman, where a nice white feminist told me that's sexist. She likes it. I refer to her as, my woman also is Latina. Why do you think that's so common for all of us racists on the right.

[Salty Cracker]

That we're snatching up all of the Latinx chicks?

[Host]

Yeah, yeah. It seems to be like it's a pandemic, I hear.

[Salty Cracker]

Yeah, no, this is just a continuing trend of our white supremacy. This is why we have empowered ICE to kick out all of you Mexicans so we can still all eat you thick Latina chickens.

[Host]

That's right. And I will say, yeah, that's right. Your wife is my Mexican. My lady is like a Brazilian slash Cuban. So she's. You know, the racism amongst Latin Americans or Latin people is something that I think Americans will never comprehend. I'm sure you probably hear it from your wife. Like, oh, my God, that was rough even for me. Like, Peruvians and Chileans, they would murder all of them. We don't understand how prejudiced they are in South America.

[Salty Cracker]

Well, yeah, no, so like when I was in the education field, you know, there's the. One of the highest amount of racism I ever saw were. Were Asians against other Asians.

[Host]

Yes.

[Salty Cracker]

You should see the Filipinos attack and the Chinese. I'm sitting there going oh, okay. We're at staff meetings and they're, they're yelling at each other and they're calling each other stuff that I can't comprehend because I don't speak the language. But the whole meeting is about how white people suck and how white people, we need to make sure that, you know, we explained white privilege to children because white people are so racist. Meanwhile, Asians are hurling horrific slurs at each other during the staff meeting.

[Host]

Yeah, well, they actually view each other as subhuman. The Chinese and Japanese, like they want. They wanted to eradicate the entire. Each one wanted to eradicate the other and would tell you they're not people, but you know, here, because a tranny can't take a dump at the right bathroom in Target, we of course are the evil colonizers. We've talked about this quite a bit. I know, and I know you do a lot of commentary and like reacting to video. So being that your. Your wife is Latina, I wanted to show one to you and get your take on this because I will say to me, one of the biggest issues is obviously feminism and the dating dynamics now are horrible, right? And if young men speak out against it, they're just called chauvinists, they're called misogynist. Whereas young men want the exact same thing that men have wanted since forever. A lot of women have changed their expectations. And every now and then I'll come across a piece of propaganda online where I go, oh, this is really damaging. And this one is perfect because I showed this first off to everyone here in the office and then I showed it to my woman who's Latina, and her reaction, it'll make sense once you see it. She said some. Some crazy bitch is going to get smacked because she believes this and it'll be her fault. So that was her reaction to this video. This is one of the Gracie family members. Brazilian Jiu jitsu, By the way, this lady does a bunch of great work. Rape defense, stuff like that. But then she's veered into toxic relationships. And here is a video that is presented where it seems like the opposite of the point that should be made. And then I'd love to get your reaction. Let's bring it up. Noodles or Tool Man? Who are you talking to? Who are you talking to? Get out of here. I have the right.

[Guest 1]

I'm not a business. Cesar. You were violent towards me.

[Host]

No, not really. You provoked me.

[Guest 1]

Okay, this is the never ending discussion of our acts of violence justified by someone who escalated the situation. And sometimes it's the women who escalate sometimes. But men can never respond with aggression because they are so much stronger than us.

[Host]

All right, that's enough. We don't need to watch all of it. Here's the thing, Mr. Cracker, because of Marvel films, I have been led to be afraid of women and how capable they are. You now know the response from my Latina woman. And I was like, is that violence if you're assaulting a man and he pushes you by your wrists off of him? Cuz this whole video seemed like women, you shouldn't do that. But you can your thoughts.

[Salty Cracker]

Well, I'm just a wild race. I have no idea what the hell she said.

[Guest 1]

I'm not allowed.

[Salty Cracker]

So I gotta let a woman beat me up because men are stronger than women. I think is the translation to what she said.

[Host]

Yes. Yeah.

[Salty Cracker]

No, no. This is again another. It's a continuation of. It's just brain aids. You women are going to get your faces smashed and you're going to get the equal rights, but the equal lefts that come right behind those right and kick right in the gut.

[Host]

Yeah, well, what I love is like we all. I'm like, well, it would be one thing if he followed up and was like into the body, sort of working her kidneys, you know, but instead she's grappling and. And he pushes us off with her wrists. And then she goes, now you were violent with me. And his answer is totally. He goes, no, I wasn't. You provoked me. And he goes like, piece of shit, you should let her beat you. Like I'm sitting here watching, like, am I? I asked him, like, is this me?

[Guest 1]

Yeah.

[Gerald]

It's not like he got on top of her and mounted her and like ralphied her.

[Host]

Well, I guess the message is so, you know, boundaries is the term. Like. So men are allowed to issue verbal boundaries, but you don't have to respect them. You can violate them physically and a man can't defensively get you off of him. I think that's the message that's being taught to young women. You shouldn't do it, but you can. And he can't protect his physical space. This is why men are checking out of the dating pool.

[Salty Cracker]

Did I miss it?

[Host]

Didn't she lay hands on him many times? Do you want to play it again? Let me play it again. Just up until his totally sensible response, for which he is villainized. Let's play it just from the beginning until the ax.

[Guest 1]

Who are you talking to?

[Host]

Get out of here. I have the business.

[Guest 1]

Caesar, you were Violent towards me?

[Host]

No, not really. You provoked me. That's it.

[Guest 1]

Okay.

[Host]

But yes, this is ending this. So.

[Salty Cracker]

I know I, I, I'm, I'm, I'm way confused because I thought that was, like, assault.

[Host]

Correct.

[Salty Cracker]

I was sitting there going, oh, they put this together. No. So that's a real thing.

[Guest 1]

Thing.

[Salty Cracker]

Like there's, They're. That's a, A channel that's trying to get women punched in the face.

[Host]

That's what it seems. That's. Now, let me ask, how do you think your wife would react if she watched this video? I'm willing to bet she would have the same reaction. Like what? She was grabbing him and.

[Salty Cracker]

Oh, no, my, My wife's Mexican. This is. And she would. Yeah, she, she's on the guy's side. She was like, no, that, that's, that's going to get you Cinco across the face, boys. You, you, you don't, don't, don't grab people and there's not going to be an issue. And don't grab towards people's stuff. Yeah, but this, yeah, this notion. Well, yeah, you guys can't. I can do whatever the hell I want because I've got boobs, but once I lay hands on you, you can't do anything because you've got testosterone. Right. That, that's, that doesn't make any sense.

[Host]

Well, it's also really hard to sort of. What was that? Sorry.

[Salty Cracker]

Yeah, but we're trying to make sense of a crazy world, so it doesn't.

[Host]

Right, right. And you have to apply this across the board. And then, you know, you apply that to whether it's divorce laws, you apply that to dating apps. You apply that to me, too, where a lot of young men just say, hey, it's a no win situation. It's a no win proposition. And they check out. And then, of course, the same feminists go like, oh, really? Because you have a small pp. Is that what it's like? No, it's because I don't want to get hit and have to just turtle. And then you go out there and tell everyone how I was a piece of crap for pushing you off of me. Young men are very concerned. We can see it reflected in the stats.

[Salty Cracker]

Yeah, well, I couldn't imagine having to go into the dating pool these days. If my wife leaves me, I'm just going to be gay.

[Host]

Yeah, yeah, yeah, that makes sense. It'd be easier for sure. Plus, they have the prep pill now, so AIDS isn't really a concern as I understand it. Like, I love don't you remember we grew up, like, it's not just a gay disease. And now you see, it's like, well, could have tricked me with the prep pill commercial. Yeah, it's basically a George Michael music video. It's just a bunch of guys banging each other. Like, good thing I have crap. You're like, okay, all right.

[Salty Cracker]

No, when we were kids, you would. You would have entire Mr. Belvedere episodes where it would be a freak out because a kid shared a cupcake with a kid who's got aids, Right? And now you've got California reps, and they're like, listen, we need to make sure that it's totally fine to give everybody hiv. You don't have to disclose that. I'm sitting there going, no, that's a bioweapon. You guys are maddeningly insane, right? Crazy, this world.

[Host]

We ran the old clip of Captain Planet. There was, like, a kid drinking at the drinking fountain. Bully goes, hey, don't drink from that drinking fountain. Johnny has aids. And that's what we were taught. That's. Yeah, zooms in. Little single tier. Like he's a Native American picking up trash or some shit. I do have. We're gonna go, actually to Rumble Premium here, but where's the best place for people to find you? And then I have another clip that I wanted to go over with you, since that's obviously in your wheelhouse, but best place for people to find support. You, sir.

[Salty Cracker]

Yeah, Just put Salty Cracker in the Rumble search engine. You'll find me.

[Host]

Yes. And you heard it here first. If his wife leaves him, he will turn gay. Salty Cracker, Rumble Premium. Let's go.

[Gerald]

Hear that?