Breaking: SCOTUS Strikes Down Trump's Birthright Citizenship EO - As It Happened

Summary

Podcast Summary

Louder with Crowder

Episode: Breaking: SCOTUS Strikes Down Trump's Birthright Citizenship EO - As It Happened
Release Date: June 30, 2026
Host: Steven Crowder & team
Main Theme:
Live commentary and reaction as major Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decisions break—especially a ruling striking down President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, plus a decision favoring biological sex in school sports, extended into broader rants on sex positivity at Pride events, the political left, immigration, European energy policy, and current news/internet culture.

---

1. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) Decisions Live Reaction

[11:17 – 18:33]

Transgender Athletes in Women's Sports:

• West Virginia v. BPJ:
  • Decision: 6–3 Supreme Court ruling supporting schools' right to determine eligibility for women's/girls’ sports teams based on biological sex.
  • Majority reasoning: Title IX's reference to “sex” only meant biological sex, not gender identity.
  • Quote:

    "The term sex in Title IX cannot plausibly be interpreted to refer to anything other than biological sex ... allowed separate sports teams precisely because of inherent physical differences between biological men and women."
    —Host summarizes ruling [12:13]

  • Crowder’s take:
    He celebrates the decision as common sense, highlighting absurdity that the case reached SCOTUS, and mocking dissents as ideological nonsense.

    “The fact that this needs to go to the Supreme Court and the fact that any Supreme Court justices dissented... tells you how every single institution can be politicized.” [13:07]

  • Discussion mocks use of terms like “cisgender” and scoffs at dissenter Ketanji Brown Jackson’s wording.

Birthright Citizenship & Trump’s Executive Order:

• Trump v. Barbara:
  • Decision: 6–3 against Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship, citing violation of the 14th Amendment.
  • Notable dissenters: Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas (Crowder expresses admiration for Thomas’s clarity.)

    “He’s the most reliable, unabashed conservative... his argument can be understood by everyone.”—Host [18:08]

  • Court’s logic: Only Congress can amend or legislate exceptions.

    “Consistent with the 14th Amendment, Congress could amend or... establish exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But Congress has not yet done so.”
    —Kavanaugh (as quoted by Host) [18:22]

  • Crowder’s critique: Blames congressional inaction, not Trump, calling out “feckless Republicans” and birth tourism loopholes (e.g., Chinese companies offering US birth tourism).

    “Donald Trump has done about everything that he can without them... Time for them to do something.” [21:50]

  • Historical background: Discusses original intent of the 14th Amendment.

    “The drafters... never meant to give citizenship to everyone technically born on US soil.” [19:36]

---

2. Rant on Sex Positivity at Pride Events

[04:30 – 11:16]

• Topic: Viral clip of a “sex-positive” Chicago dad promoting adults bringing kids to Pride events, and a challenge to “straight folks” to build sex-positive communities.
  • Panel’s reaction:
    Host and co-hosts denounce the idea, arguing LGBTQ+ culture is “always” about promiscuity and group sex, not just equality.

    “It’s about sex positivity, communing... Sodom and Gomorrah vibes.”—Host [05:04]

    • They distinguish being “sex positive” in private vs. unapologetic public group sex and are fine with private lives but not public displays, especially near children.

    “I’m sex negative when it’s in public, in front of children.”—Host [10:13]

  • Memorable moment:
    Discussion spirals into jokes about George Washington’s fake teeth, popcorn stuck in teeth, and off-topic Midwest touring references for comedic relief.

---

3. Nancy Pelosi Institute at UC Berkeley and ‘7 Plus 1’ Segment

[24:09 – 30:33]

• News: Pelosi opening the “Nancy Pelosi Institute for Representative Democracy” at UC Berkeley.
  • Clip played: Montage of Pelosi and dean touting nonpartisanship and commitment to democracy.
  • **Panel jokes about the credibility of such institutes being nonpartisan at Berkeley.

    “It’s going to be nonpartisan too, at Berkeley.”—Host [29:38]

  • ‘Seven Plus One’ Bit:
    Satirical list of potential adjunct courses taught by prominent Democrats at the new institute:
    • Elizabeth Warren’s “Heritage Fabrication”
    • Kamala Harris’s “Higher Office and Fellatio: The Hidden Link”
    • Jasmine Crockett’s “Grammar and Ebonics”
    • Ilhan Omar’s “Incest Genealogy”
    • Hillary Clinton’s “Introduction to Silencing those Yappy Whores”
    • AOC’s “Code Switching”
    • Maxine Waters’ “The Art of the Weave”
    • Plus one: Joe Biden’s confused class

---

4. Birth Tourism, Immigration Loopholes, and Republican Accountability

[18:33 – 24:09, 33:32 – 34:51]

• Birth tourism:
  Over a thousand Chinese companies facilitate the practice, with 1.5 million “American babies being raised in China by Chinese parents” through legal loopholes [20:54].
• Co-hosts’ consensus:
  No other country would allow this; time for Congress to act. Trump “did everything in his power,” blame lies with Congressional Republicans not following through.

---

5. Citizen Vigilante Movie Backlash

[36:21 – 43:53]

• Introduction:
  European crime-vigilante film “Citizen Vigilante” goes viral, receives mainstream backlash and conspiracy accusations on social media (claims Jews are pushing anti-Muslim propaganda).
• Crowder’s angle:
  Points out the film’s actual creators aren’t Jewish or Israeli, and mocks conspiratorial blame on Zionists.

  “The film written, produced by Uwe Bohl and other not only non Jews, they're non Jews and German.” [39:25]

• Takedown:
  Rebuts arguments that only “Jewish propaganda” could lead people to criticize Islamic migrant crime in Europe. Cites terror attacks, grooming gangs—and points to charter statements of Islamic groups for context.

  “Let me explain to you the difference. The same way those cartels are not Catholic... Here are the charters and or official statements of... ISIS: ‘We will conquer your Rome, break your crosses... By permission of Allah the exalted’...” [43:53]

  • Crowder’s position:
    It’s dishonest to claim Muslim-perpetrated crimes are not about Islam.

    “Muhammad was not a real Muslim. So great.” [47:09]

  • Jibe at anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists:

    “If you actually believe that a critical view or a negative view of Islam in 2026 can only be due to Jewish or Zionist propaganda, if you actually believe that, I don’t want you watching.” [48:32]

---

6. Europe’s Deadly Heat Wave, Air Conditioning (AC) Policy, and American ‘Blame’

[49:39 – 59:38]

• Issue: European leaders and media blame US “greed” and air conditioning for deaths during Europe’s heat wave.
  • Paris deputy mayor claims U.S. is responsible for global warming and Europe’s suffering, because Americans have widespread AC [51:30–52:58].
  • Crowder’s response: Points out it’s not about “AC in every room,” but barely any AC at all in Europe, calls out the hypocrisy, and highlights U.S. innovation/sacrifice on behalf of Europe.

    “If we're the heat miser, were they Jack? ... As the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases in the world, you bear a significant responsibility for global warming...” [51:30]

  • Panel notes much of Europe made a conscious choice not to invest in AC, leaving thousands vulnerable in heat waves—yet blames Americans for using technology that saves lives.

    “Even China, they're up to 77%. And you've got to believe that these videos they're releasing are just a troll—the faggy French.” [56:43]

• Statistics shared:
  • Only 20–24% of homes in France & Germany have AC; 88% in the US.
  • AC causing ~2.7% of total CO2, yet prevents ~200,000 deaths globally per year [54:21].
  • Panel: If Europe gets hotter, they'd want AC, too.

    “Even China, they’re up to 77%. And you’ve got to believe that these videos they’re releasing are just a troll...” [56:43]

  • Critique of environmental “virtue signaling” that ignores the human toll.

    “If it saves 200,000 lives and would add a negligible amount to carbon emissions...” [60:09]

---

7. Europe vs. America: Broader Political Point

[60:44 – 61:49]

• Half of U.S. politicians—particularly Democrats—would prefer Americans live like Europeans, even if it means giving up comforts and conveniences.

  “The whole Democrat Party... would rather us be like Europe, the most left of European nations... Now people know the truth. It's better here, we like it more.” [61:44]

---

Notable Quotes & Moments

• On “sex positive” culture:

  “It’s the community aspect. It’s the group sex. It’s the Sodom and Gomorrah vibes.” [05:04]

• On SCOTUS and sex in sports:

  “The fact that this needs to go to the Supreme Court... tells you how every single institution can be politicized.” [13:07]

• Blaming ‘feckless Republicans’:

  “Recognize those who are stonewalling—the Republicans, who are useless—versus the man who’s cited in this case... Those are the people who need to be targeted politically, figuratively voted out.” [18:41]

• Birth Tourism data:

  “China’s watchers estimate about a thousand programs ... claim a gobsmacking 1.5 million American babies are being raised in China by Chinese parents who’ve participated in birth tourism.” [20:54]

• On anti-Zionist conspiracy theories:

  “It’s just the Jews to make you dislike Islamic third worlders because Christians and Muslims actually have a lot more in common than Christians and Jews...” [38:15]

• Europe’s AC woes:

  “Even China, they're up to 77%. And you've got to believe that these videos they're releasing are just a troll—the faggy French.” [56:43]

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• [11:17] SCOTUS Watch: Decision on women’s sports and Title IX
• [17:40] Ketanji Brown Jackson dissent excerpt ridiculed
• [18:33] Birthright citizenship EO struck down, historical context
• [24:09] Pelosi Institute and related mocking/‘Seven Plus One’ segment
• [36:21] Citizen Vigilante movie, anti-immigrant sentiment/anti-Semitic conspiracies
• [49:39] European heat wave deaths, AC hypocrisy, U.S. blamed
• [54:21] Stats on AC and emissions/deaths
• [60:44] Summing up: American exceptionalism vs. European “rot”

---

Tone & Language

• Unapologetically sarcastic, bombastic, mocking of political opponents—typical of the show’s “politically incorrect” self-branding.
• Utilizes mocking, satire, and parody interwoven with outrage and exasperation for mainstream liberal narratives.

---

Summary for New Listeners

This episode is a masterclass in Crowder’s live political commentary: bluntly critical of progressive policy and culture, skeptical of mainstream media logic, and relentless in lampooning the left. The Supreme Court’s latest rulings provide the backbone, but the episode veers widely—from American birthright citizenship and sex at Pride to Europe’s AC guilt trips. Listeners get humor, ranting, and off-the-cuff cultural analysis, plus Crowder’s signature call to “target” inaction in the GOP, along with a consistent thread: America’s way is better, and the left’s is disastrous.

Transcript

[Host]

Welcome to the lineup live here on Rumble. From morning to night, each show rolls in the next. It's all free. Rumble owns live. YouTube's dead. And Rumble did it figuratively, kind of literally, because it's not violent. We have a lot to get to today here. We're doing SCOTUS Watch. These decisions are just coming in as we are about to go live. One win, one temporary loss on birthright citizenship. But you know, if Congress decides to grow a pair, they might be able to do something about it. Other news, Nancy Pelosi has a new institute at UC Berkeley, which brings us to a seven plus one. That citizen vigilante movie. People are mad about it. There's backlash. Ah, surprise there. Sneako says something dumb. And I don't know if you know this, but a lot of Europeans, sadly, are dying because they have no air conditioning because they're backwards and basically a third world country. Also, Europeans is spelled wrong on the rundown, but they're blaming the United States. I'm going to go make some corrections. On with the show. Some things are out of your control.

[Co-host 1]

Nope.

[Host]

Just trying to help out.

[Co-host 2]

I'm good.

[Host]

That's a nice suit.

[Co-host 3]

You too.

[Guest 1]

Thank you.

[Co-host 1]

Do you have a dollar?

[Host]

Take control of your money. Click the link in the description to download Rumble wallet today and step away from big banks. Rumble.

[Guest 2]

Wal.

[Host]

Popcorn kernel. Popcorn. Colonel, it's been like two. You were getting popcorn kernel comment below. Please share in my misery. I cannot get.

[Co-host 1]

Just got one out after two weeks.

[Host]

It might be misplaced anger because of the Supreme Court decision, but it's not. Captain Morgan, see you. How are you?

[Co-host 1]

I'm. I. My popcorn kernel came out yesterday. Literally. My gums were swelling and it hurt like hell.

[Host]

Oh, my gosh.

[Co-host 1]

I look forward to the day when you get relief.

[Host]

Too soon? Yeah, but mine should have already been good because I brushed my teeth.

[Co-host 1]

I also floss and brush my teeth.

[Host]

Yeah, but for you, it's intermittent. It's like an event. And my teeth are like half kernels. Really? Yeah.

[Co-host 1]

It makes it easier.

[Co-host 3]

Yeah.

[Host]

Actually, I bet you probably could make a nice like George Washington. You need horse teeth. Just put in some popcorn.

[Co-host 3]

Yeah, I want to work with some corn nuts up there.

[Host]

Yeah, why not? By the way, Saturday, August 1st, at Film Alley in Weatherford, Texas. Josh Firestein is going to be there.

[Co-host 3]

That's right.

[Host]

Yeah.

[Co-host 3]

Yeah. Do a little summer Texas tour.

[Host]

That's the best time to tour Texas.

[Co-host 3]

I'm going to finish it on the

[Host]

border in the winter. You should do Pittsburgh and Buffalo. That's the plan.

[Co-host 3]

That's when all the other comedians aren't doing it. So they let me do it.

[Host]

Well, there you go. You just clean up before we get. We're still waiting for some Supreme Court information to come in. I don't want to give you half of the information, so give me a couple minutes before that. Speaking of the Midwest, Chicago, here's a dad from Chicago who wants to know, I don't even know how to set this up. And Tool man, watch it, because in run through, we had some very strong opinions.

[Co-host 1]

Correct. Probably.

[Host]

This is a Chicago dad who. He wants to know if you are actually sex positive for the LGBTQ degenerates or if you're just a sex tourist.

[Co-host 2]

I think there's a question we got to start asking straight folks that go to Pride events, especially that bring their kids. Are you going to really make a difference in this world or are you going as LGBTQ tourists?

[Host]

Oh, I thought you were gonna say life sentence or death.

[Co-host 2]

These queer communities of risk their lives to build sex positive spaces in our culture. Spaces where it's safe to be the sexual being that you are openly and outwardly in community with others.

[Host]

Pause. There you go. There's the whole game. It's about sex, positivity, communing. It's about degeneracy, group sex and fetishes. No one here is sex negative because everyone here is alive, someone engaged, and most of us here have children. Yeah, it's the community aspect. It's the group sex. It's the Sodom and Gomorrah vibes. And he just skims. Used to be, hey, marriage. Remember the argument? Used to be marriage, domestic, domestic, partnership. They're just like you, same sex relationships, except nearly all of them are open, nearly all of them are promiscuous. And it's just not the same here. He lets you know you need to now support the sexual positivity in communion with each other. Let's continue.

[Co-host 2]

People who in theory believe in sex positivity, they go to the place where another group of people, the queer community, have created a sex positive environment to get their fix of sex positivity. And then they're hoping for an origin world, often a suburban world, where sex positivity is a theory. Sexuality is not just an identity. It is an action. It is a part of you that

[Host]

is lived and it is only an action. It should not be an identity, and it be should. As a matter of fact, that's a good point. No other group considers our preference of friction, which, by the way, should Be very, very low drag if done correctly.

[Co-host 1]

Just an identity.

[Host]

We don't consider that our identity. He goes, it's not just an identity. It's an action. That's all it is. It's an action. It shouldn't be an identity. You are making it an identity because you want the rest of us to tolerate, accept, and welcome degeneracy and public displays of group sex. Let's just be really clear. Hey, they're not. They're not coming for your kids, Rem. Hey, they're no different. Remember that. Now they're saying no, no. All of it on display, and we need to support it. This is a good thing. Play.

[Co-host 2]

I'm trying to be sex positive in my daily life. When it comes up, I don't shy

[Host]

away from including in a conversation.

[Co-host 2]

I don't use euphemisms or jokes to hide things. I'm openly sex positive because we're sexual beings. But I need straight folks to do a little bit more work, take some time to unpack. Do I show up in queer spaces to be a tourist in sex positivity because I don't have it in my own life? And what would it look like to start being. Building sex positive places in my quiet suburban straight community? Because sex positivity saves lives.

[Host]

I'll tell you what, it looks like the finale in Philadelphia.

[Co-host 1]

The funeral.

[Co-host 3]

Yes.

[Host]

By the way, I got the colonel.

[Co-host 1]

Hey, perfect.

[Co-host 3]

It looks like the group that's attacking the what's his name wiener yesterday, how proud they are of the trans ruling and the sex registry. That's what it looks like.

[Guest 3]

My wife's boyfriend wrote this for me.

[Host]

Yeah, exactly. It looks like the prev Pill commercial. Like, at what point you just go, hey, wait a second. This hasn't worked. It's not good. You look at aids, hiv, statistically your chance as a monogamous or even slightly promiscuous heterosexual male in the United states of getting HIV. It's statistically 0% rampant. If you're taking part in these sex positivity displays. And you know what? It's also a cop out too, to some of the. Let me just say the conservative gay folk out there, going like this was pride was never meant to be like this. It's been ruined by the trans. Just stopped. Just stop. It always was. It was always men dancing in thongs. It was always something that was inappropriate for kids. Take responsibility for the community as a whole. The lgbtq, they've always gotten it wrong. It's always been this agenda that's been pushed. We Said it was you tried to gaslight us. Now we see it. Hey, time to put your foot down. And some, by the way, have also accused this man of using a stunt kid, which is very common on social media and I would agree is revealed by some of his home films. Deep cut.

[Co-host 3]

When you talk about. When you talk about sex tourism, is he talking about bisexual people?

[Co-host 1]

No, I don't.

[Co-host 3]

I had a, you know, I had an experience in college.

[Host]

I missed the days where sex tourism just meant the one creepy uncle who went to Thailand.

[Co-host 3]

I think that was his username, actually.

[Host]

That's what sex tourism like. Oh, okay. He's going to Thailand for two months. Yeah. He saves up all we know what's going on there now. It has to take place in your town square. Oh, my God.

[Co-host 3]

Strip club sex tourism. If I go once a year, if

[Co-host 1]

I go for a bachelor party just by his. That's a sex positive space. So you need to do stripping in your community, is what he would say.

[Host]

No one cares. They used to say, what we do in our bedroom. No one cares. Nobody cares what you do in your own bedroom. And by the way, these same people go, what do we do in our bedroom? The ones that go, yeah, the conservative folks are the freakiest.

[Guest 4]

Guilty.

[Host]

Fine. No one. I don't care what you do. That's never what it's been about. This whole idea. It's like the metrosexual thing. Yeah, you're straight, but you're a little gay. You're metrosexual. Oh, do you mean like Cary Grant, Gregory Peck, Clint Eastwood, Charles Bronson? Do you mean you run a comb through your hair so it means that you somehow may want to try cock? Is that what you're trying to do?

[Guest 4]

Same thing.

[Host]

Oh, if you're sex positive, it means you're a little bit queer. You think straight guys don't like sex? You think straight women don't like sex? You think they don't like different. Different forms of sex, different positions to experiment? No, Christians are saying there's. No one has a problem with it. The problem is when you do it in the town square, everyone knows it. I'm set. I'm sex negative when it's in public, in front of children. Hey, let's just do. Let's have a shirt. Sex negative when public. How about that? We don't have to. I'm even sex positive a little bit in public. If it's like in the woods or it's like a little bit of a thrill thing and you don't get caught I get that too.

[Co-host 1]

And there's nobody else around.

[Host]

Nobody else around.

[Co-host 1]

Right? Not like the picture. I think Libs of TikTok put this out, just from yesterday, the day before, of a bunch of people dancing naked around a fountain with kids. Right? Literally right there.

[Host]

Not pole dancing street in New York. Yeah, pole dancing. Where the cops are like, you gotta get. And you know what? Hey, arrest them. Pole dancing naked. This is public indecency. That's it. No more tolerance. I don't know why this conversation needs to be had. Sex negative. Couldn't be further from the truth. All right, anything else?

[Co-host 1]

No.

[Host]

Okay, time for SCOTUS watch. So we have the scorecard right here. And as always, we make the references available. Link in the description every day that we stream. 11am weekdays. Why am I looking at this? This is a note.

[Co-host 3]

That's a scorecard.

[Host]

It says P.B. and J. Nanny Boo.

[Guest 1]

Boo.

[Host]

Hey Jude, blink 182. I don't even. Something about colonization.

[Co-host 3]

It was that Polish guy.

[Host]

Yeah, something like that. Oh, I went to the wrong page. A win and then a loss. So men in women's sports. This was West Virginia versus BPJ. The decision. And it was a 6 to 3 decision, of course, with Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson dissenting. That should let you know schools can determine eligibility for women's and girls sports teams based on biological sex. Hey, there's a win. Do we have like a.

[Co-host 1]

There's something. Celebrate, Billy. Give us some happy.

[Host]

There you go. So to be clear, this means that. Yeah, you can ban trans males from women's sports. You have the right to. And here's the reasoning. This was written. The term sex in Title IX cannot plausibly be interpreted to refer to anything other than biological sex. The ordinary meaning of the term sex at the time of enactment in the early 1970s was biological, sexual, not gender identity, particularly in the sports context. In addition, the Title IX regulations allowed separate sports teams precisely because of the inherent physical differences between biological men and biological women. Something that we would think is self explanatory. That's the whole reason for Title 9, which in and of itself is kind of silly too. But you wanted it this way. Feminists, you wanted equal opportunity in sports. And they said, yeah, by the way, what is a woman? Here you go. The fact that this needs to go to the Supreme Court and the fact that any Supreme Court justices dissented.

[Co-host 1]

Right.

[Host]

It tells you how every single institution can be politicized, and that's why you have to fight for every single one. You had judges saying no, no, no, no. Men and women aren't a thing. Let me read you Katanji Brown Jackson. The best among us wrote, a transgender woman penalized for being perceived as aggressive has experienced discrimination over on the basis of sex just as much as a cisgender woman has. No matter that the transgender woman's behavior matches expectations of her sex assigned it. That language makes no sense whatsoever. The only reason someone could write to someone from an Ivy League school is because we've allowed the word play. Transgender woman is not a thing. It's just man. Just man and woman. It's a man in a dress, probably living out of fetish. The fact that she writes this and unironically writes cisgender. Oh, the founding fathers would have wanted it this way. You think Jefferson, you think Franklin, you think Washington, you think Adams would have been able to comprehend if you just gave them. If you could step back in time and go, here's a dissenting opinion from a black lady judge. In the future, go back again. What was saying that men should be able to beat up women in sports because of something. Something cisgender. They would go, wait, hold on a second, my good man. Go back to that. That's a term I'm not familiar with.

[Co-host 1]

Sex assigned at birth. Gosh, these people. Yes.

[Host]

So the good news is, hey, great, That's a win. Yes, that's. That's a win.

[Co-host 1]

It's a win. And they're crying about it, obviously. Right. So CNN has gone back and forth between these rulings because they obviously lost one, won one, and then apparently the GOP funding bill, the thing that they were trying to do to get funding removed, also sided with Trump.

[Host]

Okay.

[Co-host 1]

Gop technically. So.

[Host]

Okay, well, that's.

[Co-host 1]

That's a win for us as well. I don't know that that was in here, but, yeah, I'm glad.

[Co-host 3]

I hate that language. She starts by saying, a trans woman penalized.

[Co-host 1]

Yeah.

[Co-host 3]

You're not. They're not being penalized. Penalized. Whatever the word is, they're not being penalized. They could still play in this. In the. The category that they were assigned at birth.

[Host]

To be clear, don't.

[Co-host 3]

Trans girl can play in the boys team. Like, no one's saying they can't do that.

[Host]

Don't they still have a weight limit in, like, junior highs football?

[Guest 5]

It's not.

[Co-host 1]

No, not in junior high. But in, like, peewee sports, they typically do have a weight limit. Yeah.

[Host]

They typically have a size limit.

[Co-host 1]

Yeah.

[Host]

So. And then in wrestling, they have weight classes.

[Co-host 1]

Right.

[Host]

So you can have that yeah, but you, you can't limit based on the single largest biological difference that we could use as far as an AB contrast. Male, female. Yeah, that's what these people believe. Trust the science.

[Co-host 3]

Why don't they talk about being penalized for being a woman at birth? Yeah, if that's the way you want to look at it. Well, there's one. There's one male on the volleyball court. Then that's a foot lower.

[Host]

Right.

[Co-host 3]

All the other 11 or 12 girls, now they're. Are they being penalized for just being born a woman?

[Host]

I don't know.

[Co-host 3]

I would. I would argue yes if I could use that language.

[Co-host 1]

I'm sorry. Listen, it's sex assigned at birth. You have to conform to the language of the court.

[Host]

And then could that open up a doctor to lawsuit for misassigning gender? Of course it could. Of course. It's just silly. You know what? We shouldn't even have these discussions or give it any validity anymore. It's done. But for those people saying, oh, it's just an executive order, Donald Trump, there are only two genders. Let me give you the path, how it starts, okay? YouTube, all of social media, they said it was hate speech to actually question the idea of transgenderism. Facebook meta had like 100 something genders at one point. So what do we do? All right, demonetize. There are only two genders. Change my mind on campus. Hate speech. People try and hit us with concrete and. Or acid, milkshakes. Whatever it is, it goes on. Other people follow suit. The president says there are officially only 2 genders. Now it goes to the Supreme Court. People are more emboldened, and we're able to recognize basic science that we always knew to be true up until the year, I don't know, Give or Take, 2013. Now we go to the one that's not great, but it doesn't mean that this one is done. Birthright citizenship. You guys want to bring it up? This is Trump versus Barbara. The decision is they struck down President Trump's executive order, claiming that it violated the 14th Amendment. It was a 6 to 3 decision. Dissenting, Alito, Gorsuch. Thomas. Gotta love Thomas. He's the most. He's the most reliable, unabashed conservative. And they were saying in the decision that, sorry, a constitutional amendment might be required to change sort of this definition of birthright citizenship. And we've given you a bit of a history here. This is one of those things where I think there are some judges here who know that they may be incorrect, but this is a Bridge too far. That's why I was surprised with the overturning when it was Roe v. Wade. I'm trying to remember, was it not Heller, Dobbs, the Dobbs decision? Because abortion was just one thing they would not touch. This is one. Because they understand that if they recognize birthright citizenship as it was originally intended, that unravels a whole lot. And the Democrat machine would invariably become violent. That's just my opinion. So Kavanaugh did say that Congress can act on it. He said, consistent with the 14th Amendment, Congress could amend or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But Congress has not yet done so.

[Co-host 1]

They should do so immediately.

[Host]

Yeah, they can't get the. Can't get the SAVE Act.

[Co-host 1]

No, I understand, but they should do so immediately. And we should make them.

[Host]

Yep. This is one.

[Co-host 1]

Should absolutely make them.

[Host]

And this is where it's important when you say, hey, feckless Republicans. I get it, I get it. This is a case. It's Trump v. Yes. Right. This is. This is. You don't see that. That Trump v. Barbara. This is a case involving President Trump executive order. He's done everything that he can, by the way, through executive order, including H1B's $100,000 fee, cut down on new ones, 87%, sealing up the border. He can't do all of it. So recognize those who are stonewalling the Republicans, who are useless, versus the man who cited in this case. Instead, people go, oh, Trump, it's all, I'm gonna vote for Kamala Harris, whoever's next, because I didn't get all of it done. This sat before the Supreme Court. Couldn't get done. Congress could do it. Now let's look at those folks who. Who has an R next to their name and isn't going to get it done. Those are the people who need to be targeted politically, figuratively voted out. Thomas, his reasoning here is that illegals are not legal domiciliaries in the United States. He wrote both the Civil Rights act and the citizenship clause. Guaranteed citizenship to persons born and domiciled in the United States regardless of their race. Neither guaranteed citizenship to persons who were not domiciled in the United States. Well, yeah, that's actually really unlike Jackson. Was it Jackson Brown? This is really simple for anyone to understand. You may not agree with him. His argument can be understood by everyone. And remember, the drafters of the 14th Amendment, they never meant to give citizenship to everyone technically born on US soil. 1866. Senator Jacob Howard, a drafter of the 14th Amendment, said jurisdiction as here employed ought to be construed as applies to every citizen of the United States. Now, gentlemen, cannot contend that an Indian belonging to a tribe, although born within the limits of a state, is subject to this full and complete jurisdiction. Meaning just because you're born in the United States technically doesn't make you an American.

[Co-host 1]

Right. And really what they're trying to address here is something that is so easy for everybody to go, well, yeah, of course that wouldn't make that person a citizen, somebody who's here on a visa, or even worse, somebody who's here illegally.

[Host]

Right, right.

[Co-host 1]

Bring up the article that they're talking about. There's like over a thousand companies in China, according to this article, that are set up for birth tourism. Yep. And the number that they put down here, and they're not even saying like just US Mainland, there are other places obviously people can go. But they said that. Make that a little bit bigger if you can. That highlighted part. China's watchers estimate about a thousand programs birth right. They claim a gobsmacking 1.5 million American babies are being raised in China by Chinese parents who've participated in birth tourism. Does that sound like something that. Let's forget what the framers. We'll come back to them in a second. But I'm pretty sure they'd agree with me. Does that sound like something any country would ever want to have or allow?

[Host]

Of course not.

[Co-host 1]

Of course not. Does it sound like that was the intent of the frame? No, of course not. Does it sound like that guy who was one of the people who said this is the amendment and wrote it, had that in mind? Of course not.

[Co-host 2]

Of course not.

[Co-host 1]

Why are we even talking about it then? It does not make any sense. Congress needs to act immediately on this.

[Host]

Absolutely. Donald Trump has done about everything that he can without them. Most things that he could do within his purview. Time for them to do something. My problem is with the thunes of the world. My problem is with the grams of the world. My problem is with the Murkowskis of the world. My problem is not with Donald Trump or this administration. Even though they are imperfect and sometimes I'm disappointed, they are trying and they have been doing more than any president in my lifetime. I'm never going to forget that. People saying, it's all the same, you're an idiot. People saying, oh, if you say that, you're a shill, really? For who ever see President Trump on this show? Name me One president who's done more on immigration. Naming one president who's even come close ever in modern American history. Naming one president who's pushed back against the LGBTQ gender bending bs. And this is a guy, by the way, who was pro gay marriage, but he's the one who had to say there are two genders. Name me anyone else who's pushed back on the cultural rot that is the left. Even close. Yeah, I get it. Is he a conservative? Maybe he's not at heart. Is he a Christian? Probably not. Didn't seem to be up until the moment he ran for office. Name me one president who has pushed back the way that this president has, as imperfect as he may be.

[Co-host 1]

Yeah. And any Republican right now who does not put a bill forward or does not co sign on a bill to correct this. But fundraisers on this. Absolutely. Gone. I don't want anybody. I don't want a Republican fundraising on this that has the ability to do something about it and refuses to do that because it's just a grift at that point. They're just raising money on something that outrages you. While they could probably do something about it and refuse to research is just

[Guest 3]

chiming in as well. The whole birth tourism thing that Chinese are doing, it's taking place in Saipan, just northeast of Guam, and they say it's. It's a US Territory, and the Chinese

[Host]

can literally travel there. They are visa free. Oh, wow.

[Co-host 3]

So.

[Host]

Wow. So there are multiple ways to exploit our system.

[Co-host 1]

Exclude the territories. Is there. I mean, there's got to be a lot that we can do about this to affect this. And I hope President Trump is ready to start doing that because his base wants it. We absolutely want this, and I could give a damn what the Democrats want by now. The DSA stuff, that's just gonna sweep right through the nation if we don't start taking stands.

[Guest 3]

Yep.

[Co-host 1]

This is one of them.

[Host]

You know what else is sweeping the nation right now?

[Co-host 1]

What?

[Host]

Nancy Pelosi fever.

[Co-host 1]

Oh, yeah.

[Host]

People can't get enough.

[Co-host 1]

Oh, I thought you meant, like, in a good way. Like in a deadly way.

[Host]

No, no, no, no. Nancy Pelosi fever. Everyone just across there. She's the. She's like the Tickle Me Elmo of the summer.

[Co-host 3]

I got the Pelosi pneumonia.

[Co-host 1]

What is that?

[Host]

It's the most popular Christmas toy.

[Co-host 1]

Oh, that's right.

[Host]

All right.

[Co-host 3]

Wait, you didn't know that?

[Co-host 1]

What? I'm kidding.

[Host]

It's. I can't think of a more iconic toy that everyone wanted.

[Co-host 1]

We said it in the summer. And I just didn't put two and two together because I'm still pissed off.

[Host]

Kitty Me, Elmo Pelosi. All right, so she just announced her post congressional plans. I mean, who cares? You're so rich and you made all your money on the public dime. Who cares what her plans are? But it does include opening up the new Nancy Pelosi Institute of Representative Democracy. That's a real thing. Here's a clip.

[Guest 1]

Today is a very exciting day for me because today is the day Berkeley will be announcing the Natchiposi Institute for Representative Democracy.

[Co-host 1]

She almost didn't get her own name right.

[Guest 1]

The excitement about this springs from the fact that this will be totally nonpartisan, okay?

[Host]

At Berkeley.

[Guest 5]

And the right time and the right place to think about this. Nancy Pelosi Institute for Representative Democracy and Berkeley's public. And representative democracy is about the public, the people, all the people, really. Berkeley is a quintessential American university when we think about its entrepreneurial spirit. Quintessential. This is a university that produces more startups than any other university. The freedom to teach, the freedom of expression.

[Co-host 3]

This public university is everyone's least favorite guy on the campus.

[Guest 5]

We're going to research democracy. Obviously, research is an important part of this institute, but we need to do more than that. We're literally going to strengthen it. And that's the goal. Nancy will be teaching here.

[Co-host 3]

So.

[Guest 5]

So it is a new manifestation, and the institute will benefit from it.

[Host]

It's tenured.

[Guest 1]

When people ask me, what gives you hope? My hope is with young people. The future belongs to them. It is what this is about. This is why I want to be here at Berkeley. One country, one destiny. That was what was embroidered in Abraham Lincoln's jacket. So we have a big responsibility to honor the vision of our founders. Democratic, just for the people.

[Host]

Yep. And it's going up quickly. They even erected a monument in her likeness already.

[Co-host 1]

Jeez.

[Host]

Already done milk for everyone.

[Co-host 1]

Cannons, they say.

[Host]

And as you just heard, she is going to be teaching there. Which brings us to this week's seven plus one. You forgot the van in the chamber. This is seven plus one courses to be taught by adjunct professors. And for those of you, adjunct professors are like visiting professors. They may lecture. So other politicians will be adjunct professors and their courses. Seven plus one. You know what? Start us off, Josh. Number seven.

[Co-host 3]

Elizabeth Warren's Heritage, Fabrication, Leveraging ancestry.

[Host]

Oh, very nice.

[Co-host 3]

I could probably use this.

[Host]

She'll teach you how to check the right box, and no one's the wiser. Seven plus One adjunct professor courses at the Nancy Pelozzi Institute. Number six, Kamala Harris, higher office and fellatio, the hidden link.

[Guest 6]

A friend in need is a friend indeed.

[Co-host 3]

She's not even using a banana.

[Host]

No, no, I don't think it's a hidden link. Seven plus one adjunct professors in their courses. Number five, Jasmine Crockett's Grammar and Ebonics Sounding Stupid made easy.

[Co-host 3]

Yeah, no, I'm talking about.

[Co-host 1]

Pretty good.

[Host]

I was gonna say what was on the board. I was gonna go back.

[Co-host 1]

Yeah, you gotta do it.

[Co-host 3]

You got Axe. Axe.

[Co-host 1]

Finna.

[Guest 4]

Finna.

[Host]

Feel me talking about some. Yeah, you know what?

[Co-host 3]

I get it.

[Host]

I get it now.

[Co-host 1]

BofA.

[Host]

I get it. $800,000 per semester well spent.

[Co-host 1]

There you go. Yeah.

[Host]

Seven plus one adjunct at the Nancy Pelosi Institute and their courses.

[Co-host 1]

Number four, Captain Morgan Ylon Omar's Incest Genealogy.

[Host]

Oh, hey, well, that just seems like an opportunity for us to show the marriage certificate.

[Co-host 1]

It's just a two hour class.

[Host]

Number three, Hillary Clinton teaching Introduction to Silencing those Yappy Whores.

[Co-host 3]

Oh, nice. She's been talking about that for a while.

[Host]

You're pretty good at that. Yeah, that's the thing they kept, allegedly. Number two, Josh Firestein.

[Co-host 3]

Number two, AOC's code switching.

[Host]

Ooh, it's a language class.

[Guest 5]

Look at that.

[Host]

I don't mind that. Look.

[Co-host 3]

Yeah, Bloody and blood out Holmes.

[Host]

And the number one new course at the Nancy Pelosi Institute taught by an adjunct professor, Captain Morgan Maxine Waters and

[Co-host 1]

the art of the weave.

[Host]

Yeah, that's true. You just got. You gotta go over, under.

[Co-host 1]

Over on the.

[Host]

You need space to weave.

[Co-host 3]

I didn't know they knit them.

[Host]

And the plus one, Former Vice President Joe Biden be teaching this. Oh, whatever that is.

[Co-host 1]

Poor guy.

[Host]

This has been this week. Seven plus one. You forgot the van in the chamber.

[Co-host 3]

That was from A Beautiful Mind.

[Host]

Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.

[Co-host 1]

I think you skipped that last little part there.

[Host]

What little last little part? Oh, I did.

[Co-host 1]

You're right.

[Guest 1]

Sorry.

[Host]

So anyway, I just institute like I love. It's going to be nonpartisan too, at Berkeley. That was the first. By the way. You know, that was the first hidden camera video that I did, or really I think anyone had done as far as online investigative journalism. It was at Berkeley where they were teaching the history of slavery. And I asked the teacher a very simple question. Hey, how many of the slaves were sold into slavery versus stolen? Because she was teaching the class like they were kidnapped into the new world black men. She said, that's a very good Question, and I don't know the answer to that. This was the person teaching the class at Berkeley. You can go back, watch it 2009 on my YouTube channel. I think it's still there. The point is this. They're not the professors you'd want. Nor would you want Professor Xavier's useless brother Chet, who we have on retainer. For some reason, unbeknownst to me, you don't want Chet anywhere around you. But here we don't really have that option because we have to make the most use of the retainer. Top shelf.

[Guest 4]

My arch nemesis.

[Host]

It worked.

[Co-host 3]

Hey there, baldy.

[Host]

Creatine, the single most researched and proven supplement of all time. Can get yours [e-mail] Patented Crave Italis, which is 90, 99.9% pure. Unlike a lot of the copycats or scam artists out there. Go to foundationdaily.com get at the low price of 29.99 and find all of the research and references there. Be stronger. Have a sharper mind. Creatine. It works. Yep, that's right. And by the way, if you guys, you don't have to necessarily buy, just don't buy creatine gummies out there. They pull those the shelves. They did not have what they claim that they had. If you do buy it somewhere else, I doubt you'll find a better price. But go with Cradovallis or Creapure. That comes from that one place in Germany. It's patented now.

[Guest 3]

You said it wrong.

[Host]

I said creative. No, Creative Alice.

[Guest 4]

No.

[Co-host 3]

Creatalis.

[Co-host 1]

Yes, Creatalis Creator.

[Host]

Son of a bitch. I can't say it right. Creatalis. I said Creative Alice.

[Co-host 3]

Vitalis.

[Host]

Anyway, Crave Italis or Creapure. There are other companies that carry it, but they often don't because it's a little more expensive. So it is the most researched supplement really in human existence. Give it a whirl. Get it wherever you can. I don't. I just don't think you're gonna find

[Co-host 1]

a better price than what we create of a Telus.

[Host]

I want to tell you that we have a patent on it ourselves. We don't.

[Co-host 1]

Nice.

[Host]

What's going on here? I can already tell you I don't like her.

[Co-host 1]

She looks like a birth. Birth tourism citizen.

[Host]

Yes, she does. Let's see.

[Guest 2]

The Supreme Court on April 1 during the argument in this case, ask any American what our citizenship rule is and they will tell you. If you're born here, you're a citizen just like everyone else.

[Host]

And that now do man and woman,

[Guest 2]

fundamental to who we are as a nation. Why the president tried to attack who

[Host]

we are as a nation is touchdown. That's what we are. That's what we are. Who we are is anyone born in the geographic borders, even if intentionally fraudulent, is part of the country. That's who we are as a nation. You don't want to get into the conversation as to who we are as a nation. What does it mean to be American? The left will never answer that question, let alone the aclu. They have to make sure that women, there are some burkas that need to be on some driver's licenses.

[Co-host 3]

The problem is that this part that she doesn't say, you know, she says, you ask any American what does it mean to be born in the United States? Oh, it means you're American. Yeah, yeah, that's what I would say too. But then you leave the quiet part out, the part where it's, oh, well, there's territories that the US owns that you don't need a visa to go to and it still makes you a US citizen Right. Now, what do you think?

[Co-host 1]

Or you.

[Co-host 3]

Well, I don't know. I don't know if that should be the rule.

[Host]

Right, yeah, exactly. Let's hear her make the case. Aside from the appeal to popularity fallacy,

[Guest 2]

he says he's going after immigrants, but in fact what he's doing affects all of us in this country. And so the response I would give to President Trump and to those who sided with him is that the wisdom of the framers of the 14th Amendment and the reconstruction.

[Host]

Just read you the quote.

[Co-host 3]

Shut up. You're an anchor baby.

[Guest 2]

Of African Americans who fought for citizenship for all, not just for themselves.

[Co-host 1]

No.

[Guest 2]

Is triumphant. And no amount of spin, no amount of propaganda that tries to divide Americans, that tries to scapegoat immigrant communities who are contributing to our country and to us.

[Host]

$150 to $450 billion a year is what they cost a taxpayer. And that's the low end, sweetheart. See, it's a lie on top of lie. They contribute. They're false. They're more law abiding than the average native born citizen. False. They're coming here and becoming American. False. They're fleeing persecution, they're refugees. False. None of these premises are true.

[Co-host 1]

Unbelievable.

[Host]

So you have to ask, why? Votes.

[Co-host 1]

There's a lack of critical thinking going on here too. And it's on purpose. Right, Obviously. But so many people out there will just buy this and be like, yeah, why would you be so Heartless as to say that somebody born here is not an American citizen. Tell me why that needs to be the rule. Yeah, they'll never be able to do that. They'll never be able to go through that process and tell you why that that needs to be the rule. And that's what makes us Americans.

[Guest 2]

Right.

[Host]

And the thing is with the left, everything is theoretical and everything is, oh, you know, shouldn't it. Well, we already have the hard data. We already have the results from people who take this approach Europe. And that brings us to this next segment. There's a movie out there right now that we covered, I believe. Was it this week or last week? It was number one, I believe on Amazon it's been going straight to the top. And now there's backlash. Citizen Vigilante. Right, that's up there, number one on Amazon's charts. It also, by the way, was on X Elon posted the full movie for 48 hours, which is awesome. And for those of you who haven't seen it, like I said objectively, it's not a well done film. But the message is bold and the message resonates with people. It's a man who goes out and basically starts righting the wrongs, delivering justice to migrants who are committing crimes, raping, killing the people Europeans are tired of as their representation turns a blind eye.

[Co-host 3]

And not just migrants too, by the way. There's this part movie where it's. We assume that people who he's dealing justice to are whatever country is French citizens or whatever.

[Host]

Yep.

[Co-host 3]

Germany or France, something like that.

[Host]

Well, it is back in 70s where he had death. Wish you had Dirty Harry. It was a, it was a crime wave problem. Now those involved in said crime wave, especially in Europe, are largely migrants, largely recent migrants. So you just combine the, the backlash that you saw in the late 60s, early 70s in the vigilante genre, the antihero genre. And then you add reality. People going, yeah, we're soft on crime. We're sitting ducks in what is supposed to be a westernized civilized country. And who's responsible for the vast majority of it? Oh, people who don't share our values. So of course this has led to some backlash from some people. So there are some people out there saying that the film is propaganda from the Jews.

[Co-host 1]

Oh, not again. They're everywhere.

[Host]

Yeah, it's just the Jews to make you dislike Islamic third worlders because Christians and Muslims actually have a lot more in common than Christians and Jews or Christians and pretty much anyone other than Muslims. So the only way that this film could be made or someone could say, I think we have a crime problem. Who's committing it? I think we have an incompatibility problem. Yeah, with Islam. Islam in the Western world. Now, the only way you may think that is because a Jew tricked you.

[Co-host 3]

No, Muslims haven't done anything themselves to make me think.

[Host]

Right? No, of course not. It's just. No, that. Stop. Stop with your filthy Jew speak.

[Co-host 3]

I mean, he went after a judge too, in the film.

[Host]

That's true.

[Co-host 3]

Multiple judges.

[Guest 4]

Yeah.

[Host]

He also just killed a completely innocent guy for no reason.

[Co-host 3]

What was that about?

[Host]

So this was written on X? They were. A Jewish film produced by Israelis. Setting the white man against Muslims is what the establishment want you to watch. Don't you see that? Tommy Robinson, funded by Israel Gad, said an Israeli, Rupert Low, a Zionist, are all part of the named psyop. Don't fall for the literal goy slop. Well, here's the truth, man. The film written, produced by Uwe Bohl and other not only non Jews, they're non Jews and German.

[Co-host 3]

Oh, so the. The Germans are getting nationalistic again, huh?

[Co-host 1]

Well, you know, against the Islam for them.

[Host]

I'm glad. I'd be glad for. I'd be glad across the board, unilaterally, for any nation other than Germany, where I get a little bit. Can you guys handle the nationalism?

[Co-host 3]

Good for you guys, but maybe just don't be the front runner here.

[Co-host 1]

Yeah, listen, you're missing the opportunity here. They just need a creative outlet. Do we need to point them at Muslim countries and all is well, right?

[Host]

Yeah, there you go. Well, they won't, because that's what the Jews want you to do. Edgar, just think about this. This is how lazy it's become. I get it. APEC should go screw themselves with a wire brush. You were just on Alex Jones show. We were talking about how Israel, you know, risking this, the ceasefire, the agreements. They were walking around

[Co-host 1]

being little piss

[Host]

ants, being pissed, bothersome.

[Co-host 3]

I get it.

[Host]

But the idea that you could only objectively view the problem of waves of Islamic migrants, that you could only view it as a problem because a Jew told you so. Okay, I read the Quran. No Jew opens the pages. I did it myself. And you see the same, these same stupid takes on this film. So it's of course the left and the Marxist right. The left and the Marxist right, they don't want this. Sneako is barely walking upright. Posted this on X. He wrote, some retarded terrorist is going to be inspired by Citizen Vigilante and Elon Musk is not going to bail them out of jail. The two Mexican catboy Nazis who tried to shoot up the San Diego mosque should have been enough of an alarm. The war on Islam is a war on humanity. No, Islam is a war on humanity. As seen by the vast majority of terrorist attacks, the overwhelming majority, almost all of them carried out in the name of Islam. As seen by 200 million Muslims across the world supporting violence against civilians. To be clear, that's a war against humanity. But he wasn't done with stupid takes. Here's more.

[Guest 4]

The same way that the cartel gangs are not Catholic. The Pakistani grooming gangs, which did happen, it grossly over exaggerated.

[Host]

Pause. Rewind it. That was so mind numbingly retarded that I want people to hear it again, but not take them out of context and finish the clip.

[Guest 4]

The same way that the cartel gangs are not Catholic.

[Host]

Oh my God.

[Guest 4]

The Pakistani groomer gangs, which did happen, it grossly over exaggerated. These people are not real Muslims.

[Guest 3]

Well, I would say one thing when it comes to this. I call it counter jihad. That's mostly what it's called and it's mostly based in Europe. You saw that Robert Low guy, he had a clip come out where he said that he disavows ethnic nationalism. He disavows this stuff and also.

[Co-host 1]

Pause.

[Host]

Are we just going to skim past the term counter jihad? Like it's anything other than awesome? Yes, yes. Counter jihad. What's jihad? I'm counter that. Yes. I'd also take anti jihad.

[Co-host 3]

Jihad.

[Host]

Yeah, yeah, Draw four. Skip your jihad. Yes, continue.

[Guest 3]

In the last section of the report, it talks about this global, you know, Islamic like caliphate that rapes, you know, Sikhs and Jews and Christians.

[Host]

Correct.

[Guest 3]

And predominantly Muslim countries. And it's so obvious what, what's happening here.

[Co-host 1]

It's just they're telling the truth.

[Guest 3]

You know, talking points to, you know, criticize Islam with that are mostly false to get a domestic base rallied up against Islam because the Zionists are really mad at Muslims.

[Host]

The Zionists

[Guest 3]

minded, nationalist minded, who would be inclined towards a foreign policy to get really mad at Muslims because Muslim countries are who, you know, the. We'll call it the Epstein class. The Zionist, the ruling elite are really mad at.

[Host]

Okay, two things. First off, you can't do the Julius Caesar haircut. No one should do it other than Julius Caesar. It doesn't work. It didn't work for the Backstreet Boys. It doesn't work for you. I want to play the beginning of that video one more time because the false premise and this Was used by the left post 911 my entire life. It's really, really easy to dispel. So they start with a false premise and then migrate you to Zionist Jews. And some people go like, well yeah, maybe I wasn't thinking critically. Let's start off with the false premise one more time.

[Guest 4]

The same way that the cartel gangs are not Catholic, the Pakistani Grumma gangs, which did happen, it's grossly over exaggerated. These people are not real Muslims.

[Host]

Okay, stop. All right, Let me explain to you the difference. The same way those cartels are not Catholic. Okay, here are the charters and or official statements of. Let's start with isis. We will conquer your Rome, break your crosses and enslave your women. By permission of Allah the exalted. This is his promise to us. Hamas. The day that enemies usurp part of Muslim land, Jihad becomes the individual duty of every Muslim. Muslim Brotherhood, the movement Islam must plan and struggle to obtain the keys and the tools of this process and carry out this grand mission as a civilization. Jihadist. Here's a part of the UK grooming gang testimony from the victim. They believed they had a position of religious and moral superiority over non believers. They believed it was their duty to punish us. As you see, that would echo Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, isis, as they believe that doing so made them good Muslims. Okay, so we went through Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, you could probably do Hezbollah. You could take the words from the Muslim rape gangs themselves. Why are they doing this? Allah? What is this? Jihad? What are you Muslim? So you are doing this because I am a Muslim who follows Allah and this is my righteous jihad. Okay, now finally me one statement from Mexican cartels who say that they're dealing drugs in the name of Catholicism. Fucking retard. It's so stupid.

[Co-host 1]

I know.

[Host]

Sorry for the language, but I've been dealing. I remember I had a teacher in the eighth grade, got sent to the office. I said, are you kidding me? Are you kidding? Just like all Christians, you know, you don't say, you know Carl. We had Carl Homalka, Montreal. The Carl Hamalka. So all Christians are guilty. Eighth grade. I believe it was eighth. I said, what did they say? They were doing it in the name of Jesus Christ. They were doing it. And by the way, do you have hundreds of thousands or millions of more examples throughout history? Certainly many, many thousands of examples of the jihadists themselves and millions of examples of people who support it. So even if you could find one quote from some cartel saying I do this in the name of Jesus, you still wouldn't Find millions of supporters saying, yeah, sometimes it's okay to deal fentanyl in the name of Christ

[Co-host 1]

if it's in the correct community. Apparently, these guys. Listen, you saw the two things that he did. One, that these are not real Muslims. Well, who gets to define that? They're coming from Pakistan, a nation that was set up by Muslims to make sure that they had a religious state for themselves. Okay? They're coming from that ancestry. It's not like some guy from America who just converted. They're real Muslims. And also that the report was exaggerated grossly. There's no evidence of that. There are claims. There's no evidence of that. He's trying to minimize everything and push it to the side and then tell me that they're going to be honest. Even if those two things were actually true, let's say that the report wasn't exaggerated, and these guys are practicing Muslims. All of the tenets of Islam met done. They're praying every single time they're supposed to pray. They're giving alms to the poor. Whatever percentage they're supposed to do towards Muslim causes. Of course, all of that. Are you still going to say that they're not really Muslim? Because you're just going to lie to Americans and hope that they believe it.

[Host]

Well, by his standard, Muhammad was not a real Muslim. So great.

[Guest 3]

We get it.

[Host]

It's not a real religion. Stop following the imaginary stupid, goofy, dumb, dumb religion. Let's go on to Europe. By the way, people think, no, I'm not debating any of these silly little bastards. He was invited on. I watched the moment. Honestly, I was just prep. Sneako wanted to come on. We said, okay. We're very polite. His chat was like, dude, you don't want this.

[Guest 3]

You don't want. You don't want.

[Host]

You're going on Crowder. You are not ready. And then he wanted my personal cell phone number. Like, can we talk beforehand? No. Time's up. Window closed.

[Co-host 1]

All right, come take. But we'll debate.

[Host]

We'll debate other people for. It's appointed to a man once to show up here.

[Co-host 3]

You could debate him and ask him which one is grossly exaggerated. The Epstein files or the Pakistani grooming gangs?

[Host]

That's very. Yes.

[Co-host 3]

Or is it only one of them?

[Host]

Yeah. And I would say, I'll debate you. Hey. In the middle of him making his points, I'd go, what do you think about this? That's Muhammad.

[Co-host 3]

You know what he looks like? He looks like the. The Blue Monstar from Space Jam.

[Host]

After the Jew. After they lose the Juice.

[Guest 4]

Yeah.

[Co-host 1]

After they lose the juice.

[Host]

Oh my gosh. And just to be clear, I get. Everyone can have different opinions. I understand it. On Israel, they can be reasonable opinions. And we get flack from both sides. We get people saying, I don't like that you're anti Semitic. Now what's Israel? What? But I will say this. If you, if you actually believe that a critical view or a negative view of Islam in 2026 can only be due to Jewish or Zionist propaganda, if you actually believe that, I don't want you watching. I don't want you watching. You are not capable of critical thought. You can even say that Zionists or Jews would have a vested interest in people being continuously angry with most. Okay, sure. But to say that that is the only reason that a human being, a Non Muslim in 2026 can see some faults with that religion. You're my preference. Go. Go watch someone who feed you the dumb shit that you want.

[Co-host 3]

I don't need a Jew to tell me I don't like the call to prayer blasting in the city at 5am I know. I don't need a Jew to tell me that I have ears.

[Host]

Because these people.

[Co-host 1]

You lived it.

[Host]

Because these people are trying to tell you we're, we're the psyop. They're the ones being genuine. Nothing to see here as it relates to Islam. All right. Speaking of Europe, look, it's terrible. People are dying in Europe because they don't have access to the same kind of air conditioning that you do here in the first world. By that I mean United States. So it's over a thousand people who have died in Europe. But the problem beyond that is that their leadership won't actually fix the problem. I would say it's pretty straightforward. Get more air conditioning, but that wouldn't be eco friendly. So now leaders have taken to blaming. Guess who, Guess who. United States.

[Guest 6]

Europe's record breaking heat wave has been linked to the deaths of more than a thousand people. That's according to the World Health Organization. In France, health authorities say the majority of deaths have been among people over 6, 65, with a 40% rise in the number of people dying at home. Seventy drownings have been reported there in the past two weeks, mostly in rivers, lakes and ponds as people seek relief from the stifling heat.

[Host]

Well, no, people are jumping off to bridges into rivers. I should note though, for some reason they do the same thing in the winter. And that is. That's old news footage. We, we check the references. We make them available every show when we stream weekdays 11am link in the description so the fault lies with the United States of America.

[Co-host 3]

It's our fault.

[Host]

Yeah, it's our fault. Not the nations that don't honor their contracts and meet their NATO requirements. Not the nations that have completely destroyed their own power grid. Not the nations that put themselves in. Not the nations that won't help their people and get air. It's the United States fault.

[Guest 4]

Right.

[Co-host 3]

They think we're the heat miser blowing down a heat wave down on them.

[Host]

That's right.

[Co-host 1]

They do know that air conditioning exists.

[Host]

If we're the heat miser. Were they Jack? Faggot. So Audrey Pulvar, Paris's deputy mayor for international relations, wrote on Instagram, dear American journalists and social media influencers, for days some of you have been criticizing and making fun of Paris because the city doesn't have AC in every room. Room of every apartment and all the places. Omg, this is so rich. Why is that rich? And by the way, it's not AC in every room. It's in any room. You can bring back the music. As the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases in the world, you bear a significant responsibility for warming. Global warming and the consequences we in France are experiencing. Your cities 90% air conditioned are not unrelated to this. She's French, so she understands double negative. We are reducing our environmental footprint and adapting the city at the same time to the short, medium and long term. It's not a one shot issue. If every American city made the same ecological transition efforts as Paris and many European cities, believe me, the whole world would see that you too could die in record numbers. Sorry. No, she said the whole world would be better off.

[Co-host 3]

Yeah. Can you imagine Phoenix without air conditioning?

[Host]

Yeah.

[Co-host 3]

Yeah, that'd be sweet. Yeah.

[Guest 5]

Let's go.

[Co-host 3]

Let's fly into the sky. Harbor Airport. No air conditioning.

[Host]

Yeah.

[Co-host 1]

Our stadiums are air conditioned.

[Host]

Yeah. Hey, wait.

[Co-host 3]

We're number two. Who's number one?

[Host]

Oh, wait, it's our problem. Okay, but what about NATO? What about the fact that all medical innovations come from. What about the fact that you guys don't exist? None of you in Europe exist without our protection. How about that? We're gonna enjoy our air conditioning.

[Co-host 1]

Yeah. Screw you guys.

[Host]

Just to be clear. And by the way, this was posted on social media.

[Co-host 1]

Really?

[Host]

Yeah, it was posted on Instagram. You know that meta emits about 8 point over 8 million metric tons of CO2 each year? The same as Munich, Germany alone. How dare you.

[Co-host 1]

She didn't criticize them in the post though.

[Host]

Yeah. Here's a Good litmus test.

[Co-host 3]

France doesn't like to criticize them.

[Host]

If they want something for the public that they don't apply to themselves at all, they take their votes from air conditioned spaces.

[Co-host 3]

Right?

[Host]

These people, they're not living like you. The huddled masses, they're likely full of crap. Now this comes from Germany. This was a public broadcaster, I guess. ARD just released this anti AC infographic. It says air conditioners, what cools us down hits up the earth. Nine.

[Co-host 1]

I do have nine of them.

[Host]

So here's something too. This is the problem with virtue signaling. Remember we had this with Sheryl Crow. Use one square of toilet paper.

[Co-host 1]

That's impossible.

[Host]

Go listen to Nick. Nick Depal had a great base. Well, I hate to be her manicurist. Then we had, remember the plastic. Do away with plastic straws. And we realized that this would account for none of the trash islands that you believe exist. Meaning even if all of this could be accomplished, it still would actually have zero discernible effect. Well, let's look at AC. Let's look at the risk versus reward. Let's look at the virtue signaling here. So AC accounts for about 2.7% of total CO2 emissions. Okay, 2.7%. But it prevents about 200,000 deaths worldwide each year. Now that's about a quarter as much of the carbon emissions as heating. That saves millions of lives. Each year, far more people die to cold temperatures than to warm temperatures. That's just. That's reality. So, 2.7 of total CO2. So if you got rid of all air conditioning, all of it, 2.7%, you'd have at least a couple hundred thousand more people dying. Hey, are these people proposing getting rid of all heating? Would they be willing to sacrifice. What's the number? How many human beings are you willing to sacrifice? About four times the amount of carbon emissions. Why aren't you talking about heating? At least Jimmy Carter said wear a sweater.

[Co-host 1]

That was helpful.

[Co-host 3]

Well, he's dead now.

[Host]

Yeah, then he. Then he'd carry his own bag to look like a man of the people. But he'd give the actual heavy bag to Secret Service. Say, go around back, you pricks. Also Western Europe, by the way, they are an outlier. So In Germany, only 20% of people have AC. France, 24%. UK 10%. Netherlands, 20%. Switzerland, 5%. Spain, 41%. They're getting warmer versus US in the United States, 88%. Japan, 92%. Which one do you want to be? Even China, they're up to 77%. They're up to 77%. And you've got to believe that these videos they're releasing are just a troll. The faggy French.

[Co-host 3]

Oh, they got AC in their house.

[Co-host 1]

Oh, good for them.

[Co-host 3]

Wait, that's not their house. Love this video.

[Host]

How you feel, your Spaniard? Enjoy your siesta. Our pigs, our pigs treat better than you.

[Co-host 3]

That dog's living the life. Dude got a fan, too.

[Host]

He's living the life right before we eat him. We even give AC to our food. What's your excuse?

[Co-host 1]

France, Germany, I love it. By the way, they didn't mention the number one. You could take everybody else off the table. And the number one, China is still the one driving it, even if you believe it. And they also didn't mention where the heat came from. The Sahara. It literally came up and is trapped there from the Sahara, which I don't know if you know, is not in the United States.

[Co-host 3]

Not yet.

[Co-host 1]

Not our problem. Deal with it, you idiots.

[Host]

So the people are dying in some of these European nations. France is really. They've been hit really, really hard. And the leadership is saying, well, you know what, though? Let's blame Americans, because none of us should be using air when I very, very rarely give Communist China credit. I don't like it when Communist China can get more of their people air conditioning. They have access to purchase air conditioning. Then Western Europe, you have to ask yourself, ooh, who. Who's. Who's really the communist? It's kind of a tie at this point.

[Co-host 1]

China's poor are way poorer than France's poor and they've got 77% coverage.

[Host]

Yeah, people used to give me crap. I'd say, no. You go to a lot of Europe and when you get out of the hotels, for you as an American, it would be similar to a third world country. You're in a building with horrible power, unreliable outlets, no air conditioning, none of the modern conveniences. You would be very surprised. 10% of those in the UK have AC. 24% in France, 20% in Germany, 5% in Switzerland. Think about that.

[Co-host 3]

Well, what I hate about this the most is that they say this from a seat of privilege.

[Host]

Right, right.

[Co-host 3]

And in Northern Europe especially, they don't have to worry about A.C. most of the time.

[Co-host 1]

Yeah.

[Co-host 3]

That is not the main reason isn't global warming. If they had temperatures like Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, trust me, they would have more ac. Spain has hotter temperatures, they have more ac. Go down to Greece, they have more ac. It makes sense. They don't have to worry about that.

[Co-host 1]

And it wouldn't they live a life

[Co-host 3]

of privilege in the nice, cool, damp, dark hell hole that they're in. And they sit there on their throat and go, oh, you Americans, your air conditioning, trying to survive.

[Host]

Yeah, yeah, exactly right.

[Co-host 3]

Fuck you.

[Host]

I will say this though too. They do though, they should have AC in some of the. Certainly in places like France and the uk. That's why people are dying. But it's because of their engineering. In the name of mother Earth. Okay, great. How many. You always said, if it saved one life, if it saves one life, let's rob people of their ability to preserve their own lives, their Second Amendment rights. If it saves one life, let's do it with the First Amendment. Okay. If it saves 200,000 lives and would add a negligible amount to carbon emissions.

[Co-host 1]

Yeah. I mean literally the French people could just flip this on every so off every few years for like five days.

[Host]

Yeah.

[Co-host 1]

So it's not even, even then. It's not talking about running 24 7. We're saying, hey, when you have a heat wave, wouldn't it be nice if maybe the 65 and older population that you said are dying from this, that are literally baking in their homes could flip a switch?

[Co-host 3]

Yeah, maybe they should have some, maybe the retirement homes or the old people homes should have air conditioning. You think when they come and bring their families to visit Disney in Orlando or in la, you think that they're turning off the AC in their hotel?

[Host]

Right, right.

[Co-host 3]

Shut up, dude.

[Host]

You know what though? I love that we see this now. We're able to expose it because people, the whole Democrat Party just, if they had their, if they had their way completely unfettered, do you think this country would be more like the country it is, the United States or Europe? Well, they've been very clear. They admire Europe, they prefer Europe. Nancy Pelosi told you that. Chuck Schumer told you that. They say they love America when it's convenient, but they would much rather us be like Europe, the most left of European nations. They would much rather only 10% of Americans like those in the UK or 20% like Germany have AC. That's what they would prefer. And there were so many. Half of our political system in this country is filled with people who I don't believe are part of a legitimate political party at this point. Borderline enemy of the state. Who would rather us be like these failed, completely failed nation states. And people just go, yeah, well Europe is so much more elegant. And people have a better. Now people know. Now people know the truth. It's better here we like it more. That's why we left and that's why we fought to keep it.

[Co-host 3]

That's it.

[Guest 3]

Okay.

[Host]

And we're able to call these balls and strikes because of your support. We're going to continue, by the way, as we do every day for another hour if you're a Rumble Premium member. If not, click that button right there. Click that button right there. It's $99 here. You can try it for $9 a month. But you only get the limited hand etched mugs. The stock if you join annually because it costs a lot to ship it to you and you get a Friday show, 100% more content, everything ad free. It's your best one stop shop. Everyone you see there is under the same umbrella. If not, hey, you'll continue watching Hayley up next for free and we'll see you tomorrow at 11. You guys sent us in just to get me aggravated?

[Co-host 1]

More aggravated.

[Co-host 3]

I'm a little aggravated too, because somebody in this video has better abs than me.

[Host]

Well, it's really easy to do if you buy them.

[Co-host 3]

Oh, I haven't tried that yet.

[Host]

Yeah. Ellen Page. Ellen Page, who wants to convince you that she's a guy. I'm not buying it. That's just my opinion. Here she is releasing her ultra new, not vain footage of her boxing.

[Co-host 1]

Playing touch butt with pool noodles.