Democrats Double Down on Terrorist Language - You Are the Enemy

Summary

Louder with Crowder: "Democrats Double Down on Terrorist Language - You Are the Enemy"

Date: April 28, 2026

Host: Steven Crowder
Platform: Rumble

---

Episode Overview

In this episode, Steven Crowder and his regular panel react to current events through a right-leaning, often confrontational lens, focusing on the claim that Democratic leaders and left-wing media are intensifying ("doubling down") on what Crowder calls "terrorist language"—rhetoric that, they argue, dehumanizes political opponents (chiefly Donald Trump and his supporters), and leads to real-world violence. Alongside this central theme, the discussion lampoons body positivity movements, debates climate policies and regulations, and mocks liberal approaches to gender and sexuality, especially as portrayed in media.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Opening Banter & Tone Setting

• Crowder and his team banter about platform changes (YouTube vs. Rumble), joke about Anne Hathaway and body positivity, riff on "fat pride" culture, and make self-mocking jokes about ASMR (01:00–09:00).
• The show maintains its typical irreverent, aggressively satirical tone, frequently mocking both public figures and the panel themselves.

---

2. The Main Case: The Left’s Rhetoric and Political Violence

a. Claims of Escalating Rhetoric Leading to Violence

• Crowder asserts that violent attacks from the left have become regular, linking this to what he calls incendiary rhetoric from Democratic leaders, especially accusations of fascism, racism, and other extreme charges (17:42–19:39).
• Quote:

  “There is a direct line to the left's rhetoric, the left's calls to action, the left knowingly lying, the labels they apply, and acts of violence.”—Host/Main Commentator (18:14)

b. Supercut of Left-Wing Rhetoric

• The show plays a supercut of Democrats/media calling Trump a fascist, Nazi, rapist, child abuser, etc. (20:09–21:19).
• Quote:

  “Donald Trump speaks about immigrants with the same rhetoric that Hitler did. Donald Trump's modern-day Gestapo is scooping folks up off the streets.”—Host/Main Commentator/Clips (20:19)

c. Comparing Conservative Rhetoric and Media Accountability

• Crowder contrasts these statements to what he claims gets his own show banned—calling Kamala Harris a “lying whore”—declaring the punishment for right-leaning speech is harsher (21:49–22:42).
• He denies encouraging violence, stating his language, though harsh, does not incite assassination attempts, unlike (in his view) language allowed by left-wing media.

d. Consequences and Reactions to Political Violence

• The panel discusses recent assassination attempts on Trump and conservative figures, arguing that perpetrators believe they are saving democracy, “fueled” by Democratic rhetoric (22:56–24:22).
• Caroline Levitt is quoted pointing out repeated violent incidents against Trump and blaming “systemic demonization” (24:22–25:15).

---

3. Panel Reflection on Left’s “Playbook” and Mainstream Media

a. The “Playbook” Theory

• The discussion focuses on the pattern: if Democrats can’t label a Republican president as stupid (Bush, Quayle, Reagan), they paint them as evil (25:51–26:51).
• Host repeatedly characterizes the left’s strategy as “Marxism” and “evil ideology.”

b. Double Standards and Non-Accountability

• They argue that Democrats like Hakeem Jeffries and AOC “play dumb” or deflect when asked about incendiary language, never accepting responsibility for potential fallout (26:51–29:01).
• Panelists repeatedly state left-wing leaders “don’t believe” their own rhetoric; it is simply about gaining and keeping power.

c. Extremist Labeling

• Crowder asserts that, while conservatives are called Nazis, rapists, or fascists, the left justifies or ignores violence against them, framing conservatives as oppressors deserving of harm (32:59–33:13).
• The conversation veers into a satirical take on the “maximum warfare” language used by Democrats contrasted with “fight like hell” slogans on the right.

---

4. Satirical Segments: Fat Pride & Fashion, Entertainment, Gender

a. Mocking Body Positivity and Hollywood

• Crowder satirizes Anne Hathaway's push for inclusivity in “Devil Wears Prada 2,” arguing the “fat pride” movement vanished with the popularity of weight-loss drugs (07:01–11:22).
• Comedy segment “Seven Plus One Fat Couture Brands” riffs on fashion labels, blending brand puns with food/weight jokes (11:22–14:11).
• Quote:

  “Anne Hathaway wants more fatties.” —Host/Main Commentator (07:28)

b. Lampooning Media Narratives on Sex and Gender in Nature

• The show mocks Elliott (Ellen) Page’s documentary about homosexuality among animals, facetiously arguing that “just because animals do something, doesn’t mean it’s moral or healthy for humans” (58:14–65:51).
• The hosts emphasize their stance that human morality is fundamentally distinct from animal behavior.

---

5. Climate Change Debate & Congressional Hearing Satire

a. Lee Zeldin vs. Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro

• The show plays and mocks a Congressional hearing where Zeldin questions DeLauro’s understanding of Supreme Court rulings (Loper Bright, Major Policies Doctrine) and the limits of EPA authority on climate change action (36:32–43:41).
• DeLauro’s emotional appeals about “flooding and poison” are portrayed as ignorant and disconnected from law.
• Quote:

  “You're asking about Section 202 of the Clean Air Act and you don't—you don't read it. You don't know what it says.”—EPA Representative (38:46)

b. Debating the Effect of US Policy on Global Climate

• Crowder and panel cite China’s outsize emissions, arguing that US efforts are ineffective globally and the left ignores China’s responsibility (51:59–53:04).
• Express skepticism on environmental alarmism, comparing shifting climate scare narratives (global warming vs. new “ice age”), and painting environmental activism as a grift (48:59–51:25).

c. Panel Condemnation of Science Denial Accusations

• The panel claims it’s “perfectly reasonable” to believe climate change is real, but not catastrophic nor primarily human-caused—and that this is distinct from “science denial” (46:29–48:06).

---

6. Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On Nazi Rhetoric:

  “You have a huge portion of people who believe [Trump and his supporters] are Nazis. ... What do you do with actual Nazis? ...You kill them.” —Co-host/Panelist 2, Host agrees (19:39)

• Defending Free Speech—even for Opponents:

  “I think it was distasteful, but I don't think [Kimmel] should lose his ability to perform comedy if people want to watch.” —Host/Main Commentator (55:48)

• Mocking Anne Hathaway's Diversity Push:

  “Anne Hathaway wants more fatties.”—Host/Main Commentator (07:28)

• On Animal Behavior Justifying Social Agendas:

  “Just because animals do it—dolphins gang rape for fun—doesn’t mean we should. ... This is the level of argumentation we can expect from the left.” —Host/Main Commentator (61:16, 64:01)

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• Left’s Violent Rhetoric & Political Attacks: 17:42–25:51
• Democrats’ Rhetoric Montage (“Nazi,” “Dictator,” etc.): 20:09–21:19
• Caroline Levitt on Political Violence: 24:22–25:15
• Zeldin vs. DeLauro on EPA/Climate Law: 36:32–43:41
• Satirical Fat Couture Segment: 11:22–14:11
• Critique of Climate Alarmism/China’s Role: 51:59–53:04
• Mockery of Animal Homosexuality Documentary: 58:14–65:51

---

Overall Flow & Usefulness

This episode blends bombastic, confrontational commentary with satirical segments, staying aggressive and irreverent throughout. For someone who hasn’t listened, it oscillates between pointed, partisan critique (especially of Democrat rhetoric and mainstream media), comedic lampooning of progressive ideas, and hand-wringing about the perceived dangers posed by the left's language and agenda.

---

For Further Context

• The show exhibits a strong anti-left bias and frequently uses controversial, sometimes inflammatory language and humor.
• It makes regular use of edited media “supercuts,” panel group-think, and running jokes at the expense of political and cultural opponents.
• Crowder’s stated goal is to “make the case” that left-wing rhetoric has both encouraged and excused political violence—framing those to his right as “the enemy.”

---

Caution:
Quotes and tone are faithfully preserved from the transcript. This summary reflects the provocative, unfiltered style of the broadcast.

---

For more, see the full episode on Rumble or visit louderwithcrowder.com/mugclub.

Transcript

[Shopify/Mint Mobile Advertiser]

When it's time to scale your business, it's time for Shopify. Get everything you need to grow the way you want. Like all the way. Stack more sales with the best converting checkout on the planet. Track your cha chings from every channel right in one spot. And turn real time reporting into big time opportunities. Take your business to a whole new level. Switch to Shopify. Start your free trial today.

[Ryan Reynolds]

Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile with a message for everyone paying big wireless way too much. Please, for the love of everything good in this world, stop with Mint. You can get premium wireless for just $15 a month. Of course, if you enjoy overpaying. No judgments. But that's weird. Okay, one judgment anyway. Give it a [e-mail] switch upfront payment

[Shopify/Mint Mobile Advertiser]

of 45 for 3 month plan equivalent to $15 per month required intro rate first 3 months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra. See full [e-mail] welcome to the lineup live.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Can you hear that Tool Man? How about that one? Welcome to the lineup live here on Rumble. Each show rolls into the next live all day. You don't need to change that channel. Open a new tab. YouTube is pretty much dead as far as live streaming. Rumble did it figuratively. We're going to be talking about that today. The left's violent rhetoric, how they are doubling down on it now. And they're both doubling down and denying, which is weird. Let me be really clear about this. The reason that there have been left wing leftist violent attacks. One every seven. Every seven weeks. We haven't gone seven weeks without one since the first attempted assassination of Donald Trump is because of the rhetoric of the left. And these people, these crazy people, these psychopaths believe that they will be the savior to democracy. It's really straightforward. So we're going to make the case for that. Let's remove all doubt. Lee Zeldin shut down that derosa. What's the name of the old witch lady with the purple? Anyway, it's a lot of fun. And Anne Hathaway hates skinny people because she's still trying to make Fat Pride a thing. But it's not a thing. Ozempic. So it's done now. So that's kind of funny. We have a seven plus one on that. And Elliot Page. I still refer to Elliot as Ellen because I can made a movie about gay animals. Toolman said that he couldn't hear me in the morning. Like why are you whispering? And I always speak. You guys let me know if this is whispering. I think this is a normal level asmr.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

You're also being amplified.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

So from now on, I'll talk like this. All right, on with the show. You.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Foundation daily. All the daily vitamins and minerals you need. Check clinical ingredients, check if they're clinically effective doses, check and lab tested so you know that what's on the label

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

is exactly getting foundation Filling the gaps.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Fill in the gaps that you might be missing. Go to foundationdaily.com today. Subscribe and save 40% for life.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Help.

[Guest/Caller 1]

Look at me.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Trump is president again.

[Host/Main Commentator]

He's gonna make America great again.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Today we celebrate our independence.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Click Rumble premium and join now for 99 annually or 9.99amonth to get the entirely ad free experience and an ever expanding roster of content creators and free speec. Oh, that's nice.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Fuck nice. Good job, Tim.

[Host/Main Commentator]

I guess that filthy wap decided he

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

can just cuss right off right in the outset today.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Don't worry, he can't hear us, Josh. Because if we talk like this, he also can't hear us.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

This is the worst ASMR I've ever heard.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

I have canker sores.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

I'm glad you're using your mic during the show.

[Host/Main Commentator]

It's a fun day. Yes, it's an abusive work in Iron man. CEO, how are you?

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Fantastic. Can we keep making fun of Tim and not me?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah, you know what, man? I don't like him making a judgment call. Admonish him right off the bat. That is not your place.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

You're welcome.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Tim, dictate how Steven runs the show. Come on, dude.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Nervous.

[Host/Main Commentator]

I tell you what, you're the. You're the. You're the big Hitler.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

What?

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Big Hitler? You're big Hitler.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

You heard him.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah, there's little Hitler and then there's big Hitler.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah, no, Hitler's bad.

[Host/Main Commentator]

In this circumstance, that's exactly what you are.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

You're.

[Host/Main Commentator]

You're, you're the bit. You're big. You're snuffle up a Hitler.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Imagine like a seven foot Hitler. That's you.

[Host/Main Commentator]

This like I was troubles the grouch. I was trying to take like 10%

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

of the stuff off of Tim, not 150%.

[Host/Main Commentator]

You're the cookie Mengele.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

All right, somebody called David.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Friday, May 1, Bricktown Comedy Club in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Not underscore Firestone on X. Josh Firestein, how you doing?

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Great. Great. I'm excited to make fun of Gerald some more.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah, it's a good time. And you're not a Hitler. No, I'm not.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

No, I'm not even a happy one.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

No, no, no. Who's dressed as Hitler in this room?

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

How am I dressed? Like Hitler. I'm wearing a fishing shirt. I got on an emergency one time.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

He also fished.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Breaking K fob Admonished to a man. Breaking Kay fob.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Tool.

[Host/Main Commentator]

He Gerald admonished.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

It's a noodles. You know, they don't know. They don't know.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Breaking.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

You don't break kay fob.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

What's that?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Oh.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Oh. There is no happy Hitler in the studio. Happy Hitler is its own entity. All right.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Yes.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Speaking of I don't know Hitler. I don't know how to transition here.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Yeah, figured that one out.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Anne Hathaway.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

How do you transition?

[Host/Main Commentator]

So she was given this press tour for the Devil Wears Prada, too, and she decided that she wanted a certain type of model. When you think Prada, you think fashion couture. Remember? Like, do you guys remember this? Fat Pride was a thing a while ago. For those of you who are new here, you may not know because, like, Ozempic came out and all the Fat Pride representatives are gone now. Amy Schumer, Rebel Wilson, pretty much everybody.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Lena Dunham's still out there chowing down,

[Host/Main Commentator]

holding down the report.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

She's still showing her face all the time.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Well, that's because she has nothing else to offer. She can't do anything else other than be gross, so. Well, I guess I kind of just revealed it to you. It's not really a hint. Anne Hathaway wants more fatties.

[Interviewee/Guest Speaker]

It's better when you see so many

[Host/Main Commentator]

different types of bodies, not all the time. That brings us to this week's entertainment minute. And yes, I just let you. This is to clear the palate. It's going to be a little silly. It was a little intense yesterday. To be clear, we've never just made fun of someone for just like, hey, hey, you're fat. But when people advocate for fat pride, when people advocate that all bodies are healthy and all bodies are equally beautiful, of course we will. You know, we'll stand on the side of. Of all medical data, literature, science, and when they're disingenuous.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Zero chance Anne Hathaway would be interested in this.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Well, I don't know.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Well, I mean, maybe a 2% chance. I can't be charming.

[Host/Main Commentator]

If she had to choose between you or the big Hitler, she'd probably choose you.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah, you don't know that.

[Host/Main Commentator]

I don't know. They like the bad boys.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Gonna stick.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Don't you know, don't you know it?

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Volume.

[Host/Main Commentator]

You're so big.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Apparently I was the good guy, though.

[Host/Main Commentator]

So red carpet interview Anne Hathaway because she dec. Decided she's not unlikable enough. Decided to make this statement.

[Interviewee/Guest Speaker 2]

I've been a plus size model and size inclusivity advocate for 15 years, and I have to say a huge thank you for insisting that there was diversity in this movie, in that Runway show.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

There you go.

[Interviewee/Guest Speaker 2]

Why was that important to you?

[Interviewee/Guest Speaker]

Well, because there were. I had seen that there were a lot of traditionally sized models in our movie.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Traditionally sized.

[Interviewee/Guest Speaker]

I just know that.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

And I wanted to look good for

[Interviewee/Guest Speaker]

everyone, and so I thought that it would be wonderful. And we also know in the last few years that the fashion industry can take a more inclusive approach to beauty standing. And I think that we're all kind of happier when. When it's like that, when everybody feels included. So I just went up to the producers and said, hey, do you think that we could.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Was it about a mean fashion lady, though?

[Interviewee/Guest Speaker]

Embarrassed. We didn't notice. And of course. And within like two hours, suddenly there were more girls there. And I just. Yeah, it just made me happy.

[Host/Main Commentator]

No, there weren't more girls. You just miscounted.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah, the volume was up.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

This is the thing.

[Host/Main Commentator]

It's so disingenuous. Like, yeah, how expensive is that dress? How many people worked on your makeup and hair? How many nutritionists and personal trainers?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

And by the way, there's nothing wrong with that. And I understand, of course, there are

[Host/Main Commentator]

multiple sizes that can be within the bounds of health.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

The good news is that men don't

[Host/Main Commentator]

have the unrealistic standards that you think we do. Men rate women on a very healthy bell curve. When you look at the statistics, women do not. They have unrealistic expectations and they're disingenuous about this.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

And yeah, everyone is.

[Host/Main Commentator]

There's no difference at all. And they do everything they can to put their best foot forward. There's nothing wrong with that. Let's just be honest about it. Also, it's okay. The world of high fashion isn't for everybody.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

It's not for me. It's not for all of us guys here who are like, but guess what?

[Host/Main Commentator]

I don't lament it. I don't care. There are other things that I can do. Not all things are meant for all people. And you may not know this, but they have been trying to push the fat pride, the body positivity in high end couture for a very long time, and none of it has worked. Which brings us to this week's fat Couture brand. Seven plus one.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

You forgot the van in the chamber.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Seven plus one fat couture brands you may not have heard of.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

No.

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

Number.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Number seven. You know what?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Josh Firestone let's you do the honors.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Number seven.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

I actually modeled for these guys. Didn't work out, but Abercrombie and lunch.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yes, that was well.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

And get your denim and sandwiches.

[Host/Main Commentator]

He's happy. Seven plus one fat couture brands. Number six, Kenneth cold cuts. Kenneth cold cuts.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

It's gonna need more material for that jacket.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Seven plus one.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Got a window with those nipples.

[Host/Main Commentator]

High end fashion couture. I don't know what all those words mean, so I'm combining them brands. Number five, C.A. morgan Fart Jacobs.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Oh, well, that. Hey, that's just.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Well, it's the fermenting food.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

It's like too much kombucha for that guy.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Number four, Louis Vuitton's a fun. Louis Vuitton's a fun.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Is that the same guy?

[Host/Main Commentator]

He gets a lot of work.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

He does, yeah. Hathaway of these guys.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Number three, Cat and Morgan. Say it as it needs to be.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Clinically obese.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Clinically.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Oh, clinically obese.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Are we sure that's a woman?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

It's still a good ad.

[Host/Main Commentator]

I don't know what?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Fart's still a good ad.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah, that's right. I could see that on a Macy's counter.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah.

[Host/Main Commentator]

What are you talking about? Larger people, they tend to be gassy. I've seen the clumps. That's true.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah, well, it's not a secret. It's. It's diet based.

[Host/Main Commentator]

I had friends in the family, they were all overweight and no joke, they walked out of the Nutty professor because they took offense to it. I'm like, that is an admission. You shouldn't tell anybody that.

[Co-host/Panelist 4]

At least they walked.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Hey, fun fact. The Washington Post did a study. Turns out women have stinkier farts.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Really?

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah. Men have. Have more fart, they have more gas. But the smell is stinkier. From the woman.

[Host/Main Commentator]

I don't know that I believe that.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

It's the Washington Post. They never lie.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Seven plus one, fat couture brands. Number two, Josh Versace puffs, Versace and the number one high end fat couture brand, Balenciag.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

God, I'm having a heart attack. And the plus one, Jimmy doesn't chew. That's been this week. Seven plus one.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Oh, God,

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

You forgot the van in the chamber.

[Host/Main Commentator]

You have to chew your food.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

We didn't let that last one breathe enough.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

No, that's Why I just wanted, you know, people. It's one of them.

[Host/Main Commentator]

What you call Easter eggs. Or for the fat Pride people, Cadbury Eggs.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Go back. Yeah, go back and pause it like it's the whole nine yards.

[Host/Main Commentator]

You know what's silly is that whenever we sit down and write a seven plus one, if it's fat themed, we all laugh more. We're children.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah. We're just sitting there like, ah, Bart Jacobs.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

I put a sandwich in his hand.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

He does look like he ate cold cuts. And it took hours.

[Host/Main Commentator]

No one else even tries. 11am weekdays. We do this every day.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

So fashion is.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Look, let's be clear. They take huge risks, which makes them.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

I understand it.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Like, they get to determine their models. It makes them pretty vulnerable. Thankfully, there's a way you can control your financial vulnerability. Rumble Wallet. Keep your crypto safe even when you are at your most vulnerable.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Hey, how'd you get in here? Go.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Stop recording me. Do it for social. Go to wallet.rumble.com to download the Rumble Wallet today. No banks, no fees, no middlemen. Just your money and now your crypto in one secure, easy to use place. Get started today. And you know what? I know that many of you are going to critique my body, because that's how it goes. I'm fine with it.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

You had great boobs. It was fine.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah, I pulled them off, by the way. It was needlessly complicated. That shoot where you guys put fake mermaid boobs on me and then put some kind of bizarre foam of hydrogen peroxide and brewer's yeast and then soap bubbles. I'm like, why don't we just use the soap bubbles?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Why do we need all of these layers?

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Why? We could have.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

No, I mean, we had the AI do that. The opportunity to put some stinky stuff on you.

[Host/Main Commentator]

I smelled like week old fries for I don't know about a day.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeast sound delicious.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

That's the only way I can describe it.

[Host/Main Commentator]

With the hydrogen peroxide and the yeast. All right.

[Grow Therapy Advertiser]

We're almost halfway through the year and a lot of people are running on empty without fully realizing it. Grow therapy helps you find care that's covered by insurance before burnout becomes the baseline. Whether it's your first time in therapy or your 50th grow makes it easier to find a therapist who fits you, not the other way around. They connect you with thousands of independent licensed therapists across the US Offering both virtual and in person sessions, nights and weekends. You can search by what matters like insurance, specialty, identity, or availability and get started in as little as two days. And if something comes up, you can Cancel up to 24 hours in advance at no cost. There are no subscriptions, no long term commitments. You just pay per session. Grow helps you find therapy on your time. Whatever challenges you're facing, Grow Therapy is here to help. Grow accepts over 100 insurance plans, including Medicaid in some states. Sessions average about $21 with insurance and some pay as little as $0 depending on their plan. Visit GrowTherapy.com BookNow to get started. That's GrowthTherapy.com BookNow GrowthTherapy.com BookNow availability and coverage vary by state and insurance plan.

[Shopify/Mint Mobile Advertiser]

What would you do if your online store converted 36% more shoppers? You could take 36% more vacation.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Another pina colada?

[Shopify/Mint Mobile Advertiser]

Yes, please. Open a new retail location with 36% more square feet.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Fantastic.

[Shopify/Mint Mobile Advertiser]

Hire 36% more help.

[Host/Main Commentator]

You're hired and you're hired.

[Shopify/Mint Mobile Advertiser]

Shopify has the world's best converting checkout up to 36% better than other e commerce platforms. What you do with those extra sales is up to you. Switch to Shopify [e-mail] setup and get a $1 trial.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Shopify.com setup look, we talked about this yesterday.

[Host/Main Commentator]

And yesterday we were primarily dealing with the Marxist right because we're at a time in this country where it should be a Covid like situation. And by that I mean people waking up and seeing the left for what they are. And in this instance, that should be the left's violent rhetoric, their violent worldview inherently, and the results therein, which we have seen. Instead, the goalposts keep getting shifted and people are talking about impeaching Donald Trump. There is a direct line to the left's rhetoric, the left's calls to action, the left knowingly lying, the labels they apply and acts of violence. Since President Trump's first, well, the assassination attempt against him, I don't want to say his first assassination attempt. Now 2024, July, there has been at least one high profile leftist political attack every seven weeks. Let me put a fine, let me put a finer point on this. Here's why. Because these people, whether it's Cole, Thomas Allen or whether it's Luigi Mangione, whether it's, take your pick, they believe that they are going to be the savior to democracy. They believe that democracy is teetering on the edge of extinction. They believe that that is due to Donald Trump and they believe that they will save it. Why? Because that's what the left tells them. This isn't one person out of context. For example, Saying target these districts to vote them out. This isn't one person saying, fight like hell. Remember that where they said that was violent rhetoric. This is person after person after person of note or in a position of authority, referring to President Trump and many of his supporters and his administration as fascist. Murderers, rapists, pedophiles, Nazis, all of these. So what do you do with Nazis? We've talked about that. What do you do with actual Nazis?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

You kill them.

[Host/Main Commentator]

I have no problem with that. I have no problem with the Allies killing Nazis, those who were actually sending people to concentration camps. Just like I have no problem with allies or anyone killing, killing Communists.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

I get it. That's how you have to deal with them.

[Host/Main Commentator]

You have a huge portion of people who believe that, about half of the voting population and certainly this administration, in case you are still wondering as to. Well, is there, is there a direct path?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Here you go.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Here's a supercut. I don't think we need to say more, but we will. Do you think Donald Trump is a fascist?

[Guest/Caller 1]

Yes, I do.

[Guest/Caller 2]

The former president a rapist.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Donald Trump speaks about immigrants with the same rhetoric that Hitler did. Donald Trump's modern day Gestapo is scooping folks up off the streets.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazi, Nazi.

[Guest/Caller 1]

If your friends are concerned with authoritarianism, they should be concerned with the occupant of the White House right now.

[Guest/Caller 3]

Donald Trump raping children. Donald Trump threatening to kill children.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

You don't care that the president might be a pedophile?

[Host/Main Commentator]

He is a dictator.

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

The president is a racist.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Kissing the ring of the wannabe dictator is a confected convicted felon. As aspiring presidential dictators go, he is simply in a class by himself. I believe we're on the path that Nazi Germany went down under Hitler.

[Ryan Reynolds]

And I say that as a political science and history major.

[Host/Main Commentator]

He has built a whole presidency on race.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

A racist, abusive coward who could permanently

[Host/Main Commentator]

damage the fabric of our society.

[Guest/Caller 2]

Like in the core of his being.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

He's a racist.

[Host/Main Commentator]

He's a con man.

[Caroline Levitt]

The last time the Alien Enemies act

[Host/Main Commentator]

was invoked, it was used to detain and deport German, Japanese, Italian immigrants doing war work.

[Caroline Levitt]

11.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Now, I know the left will defend that and say, ah, it's just a, it's a language barrier.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

No, no, I would argue we don't need language barriers from our congresswoman.

[Host/Main Commentator]

That's a good point.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Also, I mean, call me crazy and old fashioned.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah. Also, we don't need that much inbreeding now.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah, we don't need it.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Keep in mind. So you just heard it. Nazi fascist. Dictator. I believe autocrat was used. If not in that montage, it certainly has been. Rapist, murderer, felon, danger to democracy. Now compare that to the fact that we were actually banned before an election stream. Because the worst thing that I said about Kamala Harris was that she was dumb. And I believe that she was a whore, rightfully so, who slept her way into office. So compare all the rhetoric of the left that is allowed to go on completely unfettered to this was a bannable offense. I've referred to Kamala Harris as a lying whore. But to be clear, it's only because she's lied and she had sex with people for political gain. So by definition. But that's not encouraging any type of assassination. We all know many lying whores. Some of them are very nice people. Once you, you know, sort of cafeteria, compartmentalize out the lying whoredom.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

It's true.

[Host/Main Commentator]

I knew a tremendous lying whore in college. Not intimately, no.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

I knew she was tremendous.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

She was very nice.

[Host/Main Commentator]

She was a lying whore.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

You just didn't want to rely on

[Host/Main Commentator]

her because, you know, she would lie and do horror things.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Now here's the thing. We have, okay, multiple assassination attempts. And obviously we've seen successful assassinations. I use that term, I hate to use that term, but assassinations that were carried out, we saw that with Charlie Kirk. We've had to deal with this for a very long time. The latest one was just charged finally with attempted assassination. That was an pretty much record time.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

He thought he would go down in

[Host/Main Commentator]

history as a savior to democracy. Instead, he got this photo shoot. That's about all he got.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

How embarrassing. Assassinate the president, you end up looking like you're from Chipotle.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Do they have him in a space camp blanket?

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

I mean, they're trying to keep him warm, I guess. I don't know.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah, they stripped him of his clothes, I believe, because he had weapons and stuff. And then they kept him warm and covered.

[Host/Main Commentator]

So stupid.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

But here's the thing. I also understand. I understand why he thought that if

[Host/Main Commentator]

I was him, I would think, yeah,

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

the left is going to have my back.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Right? They believe that this is a Nazi, this is a fascist. They believe this person's a threat to democracy.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

They'll be grateful for me taking away

[Host/Main Commentator]

that threat to democracy.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

He saw the chicks line up for Luigi Mangione.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah, this is how I'm going to get it. Doesn't exactly apply across the board.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Hello, conjugal visits.

[Host/Main Commentator]

And you let me know if he.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

That's if you get in their mindset.

[Host/Main Commentator]

It makes sense. It makes sense with the kind of warped logic that they have. This is not a logical leap that we have to make. You can comment below. We'll be talking about this quite a bit. And Caroline Levitt addressed this trend at yesterday's presser.

[Caroline Levitt]

Nobody in recent years has faced more bullets and more violence than President Trump. This political violence stems from a systemic demonization of him and his supporters by commentators. Yes. By elected members of the Democrat Party and even some in the media. This hateful and constant and violent rhetoric directed at President Trump day after day after day for 11 years has helped legitimize this violence and bring us to this dark moment. Those who constantly falsely label and slander the President as a fascist, as a threat to, to democracy, and compare him to Hitler to score political points are fueling this kind of violence. The left wing cult of hatred against the President and all of those who support him and work for him has gotten multiple people hurt and killed.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah.

[Host/Main Commentator]

And by the way, at least four attempts that we know of on President Trump's life.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Yeah.

[Host/Main Commentator]

There's been at least one high profile leftist political attack at large every seven weeks since the first attempt. Yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

And this is the totality of it. What she's talking about is the repetition of this. It's not some one off claim by AOC or Bernie or somebody else just trying to score political points or try to get more votes. It's over and over and over by everybody in the media, in Democratic establishment, just being echoed over and over again. Of course, it starts to sink into people and go, well, this must be true. Everybody is saying it, right? Not once, a hundred times.

[Host/Main Commentator]

It's not happenstance. It is the playbook. It is the playbook. If they can't make you out to be an idiot like they did with George W. Bush or, you know, they did with Dan Quayle, they kind of did that with Ronald Reagan. Then they make you out to be evil. Yeah. And I have consistently said, whether someone is an idiot, Kamala Harris, or you might say evil, that they're sharp. It's just Marxism. It's Marxism. And I believe that it's. I believe that it is an evil ideology. I believe that it has leftists under their spell. They don't know that they're doing evil. But I believe that the theft of people's personal property through the use of force, not to mention transitioning children and the Holocaust that we have seen in babies, I do believe that it's an evil ideology. I don't shy away from that. There's a difference between discussing those differences and saying, these people, this person is a threat to democracy, uniquely. Let's go to some more examples here of people doubling down because they have to answer for it. Now that's good, but they don't answer for it. Hakeem Jeffries, he answered this question well. Political. You know, it's all bad, right? The rhetoric is bad, full stop.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

But.

[Host/Main Commentator]

And then does it. What are you advising your members to

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

do about rhetoric right now?

[Host/Main Commentator]

That you criticize the President without facing geocaching criticism?

[Guest/Caller 2]

Political violence in any form directed at anyone, whether that's the right, the left or the center, is unacceptable. Period. Full stop.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Got it.

[Guest/Caller 2]

The notion.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Oh, here he goes.

[Guest/Caller 2]

Any of us are concerned with so called criticism from these phony Republicans as it relates to anything that has been said, certainly as it relates to the comment related to maximum warfare everywhere, all the time in connection with the redistricting battle that Republicans launched. I stand by it. You can continue to criticize me for it. I don't give a damn about your criticism.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Where's Blade when you need him? Figuratively. See, that's a joke. They actually engage maximum warfare. We compare that in the montage you just saw to fight like hell, because I know people say, well, both sides do it. No, no, they don't. Because we ran you a montage of plenty of people on the left saying fight like hell. It's an expression that's used. It's a colloquialism. People know that fight like hell doesn't mean physically fight or go assault somebody, especially in the context that it was used. Especially when he said, make your voices peacefully and patriotically heard. Compare this rhetoric to fight like hell. Because that was one of the reasons for impeachment. And so what do they do? They espouse these, these, this evil rhetoric. That's really the only way to say it.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Maximum warfare is too violent for a Call of Duty title.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah, exactly.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Let's call it like Modern Warfare or something. Not like maximum warfare. That's going to make kids into shooters.

[Host/Main Commentator]

We're going to go with minimum effective dose of warfare,

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

reasonable use of warfare.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

And then when they're called on it,

[Host/Main Commentator]

they either do what Hakeem Jeffries did, now he's an idiot. So is aoc. They just play dumb like, I don't know, I don't know, I don't know. Fascist, Nazi rapist, murder. What?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

What did I say? I don't know. Did I say that?

[Host/Main Commentator]

The White House and the President Democrats

[Guest/Caller 1]

rhetoric in the aftermath to what specifically?

[Host/Main Commentator]

I mean, they've been saying that your rhetoric from Democrats is causing extremists, presumably.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

What now?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Try to exact violence that felt right.

[Guest/Caller 1]

Yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 4]

I mean, rhetoric.

[Guest/Caller 1]

I would be interested in them actually saying what exactly is inciting that.

[Interviewee/Guest Speaker]

Right?

[Host/Main Commentator]

We will, yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Don't worry.

[Guest/Caller 1]

When you have people committing crimes in office, we have an obligation to say that someone is committing a crime in office.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Like insider trading.

[Guest/Caller 1]

President of the United States. Trying to use an opportunity to escape any accountability for any actions is just not a responsible course of action.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Liar whore. Liar whore. And you know it.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Now fair. And people will be more offended at that. First off, use an opportunity. If it's the fourth time that someone tries to take your life and gets close, are you really using an opportunity or is it an appropriate time to maybe point out a pattern like these people who are professional victims to use

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

it like, you know, no one was.

[Host/Main Commentator]

The left doesn't care until you're actually dead.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

I've had this.

[Host/Main Commentator]

You can go watch. Change my minds. Where people have thrown things at me. Whether it could be concrete milkshake, could be chocolate, vanilla, acid. I've talked about it, people. One guy stole a homeless man's pencil case like a lunchbox and whipped it at me. And the lady sitting goes, you're fine. You didn't get hurt. Oh, so I have to be hemorrhaging for it to matter.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Also, there's a homeless guy that no one cares about.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah, exactly right.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Lost his lunch. What the hell?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Lost his Crayolas.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

But we went on a killing spree because of it.

[Co-host/Panelist 4]

Also, Also, I have to disagree. They don't care when you die.

[Host/Main Commentator]

It's.

[Co-host/Panelist 4]

It's, you're fine, you're fine, you're fine. You deserved it.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Right?

[Host/Main Commentator]

That's. You know what? That's a very good point. That's. That's true for most of them. And I'll tell you what she said if someone were to point me to it. Well, good news is this is a show that gives you all the references every single day. Check the link in the description 11am Eastern when we stream weekdays. Here you go, AOC.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Remember these bitch.

[Guest/Caller 1]

The United States is running concentration camps on our southern border, and that is exactly what they are. They are concentration. Concentration camps. I want to talk to the people that are concerned enough with humanity to say that we should not. That never again mean something. The vast majority of incidents of domestic terror come from white nationalism and that we are really, truly facing an environment of fascism. Donald Trump is also very old and a racist. And a neo Nazi. I don't care what Elon Musk is doing behind a presidential seal in this country. We hate Nazis. Let me make myself clear. I don't celebrate rapists. So, no, I'm not going to the inauguration room. And if Donald Trump wants to find the rapists and criminals in this country, he needs to look in a mirror today. It's not about progression. It's not moderate. It's not liberal.

[Shopify/Mint Mobile Advertiser]

This is about.

[Guest/Caller 1]

Do you understand the assignment of fighting fascism right now? I would not say that assassinating a young mother of three in the street is part of ICE's mandate.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Did I say that? That's not rhetoric that might lead to violence. Is it, like, what's the sentence for rapists and genocide? Oh, it's the death penalty.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Maybe that was imprudent.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

She made a good point. We should get rid of the gas chambers on the southern border.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yes.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yep.

[Host/Main Commentator]

The ones that she didn't see because she took a photo op looking into a parking lot.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah, those ones.

[Host/Main Commentator]

At least you didn't have the fake handcuffs that time. There's no accountability for the left.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Why?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Marxists don't believe in it. They don't believe in it. The ends are all. They always justify the means. That's. That's the why. Because you're the oppressor. Why? Because white Christians, well, now you become Christian nationalists. Domestic terrorists. Men.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Okay.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Rapists. Republican Nazis. Concentration. If you're detaining people who are here illegally, concentration camps, they just change the words. And they never take accountability. And this is why places like New York get exactly what they deserve. That's why I don't spend that much time on Mamdani or people like aoc. Because, hey, you want them, you get them. Let's have a Couchy check in. Is she gonna run for Senate in 2028? There's a 53%.

[Interviewee/Guest Speaker]

Oh.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Guess you didn't learn your lesson.

[Host/Main Commentator]

New York.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Enjoy.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

I gotta say, I'd rather her run for Senate than run for the White House.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

I'd rather run for president.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

She'll get destroyed.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Another lady getting destroyed in that election. Dude.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Do you think the left and.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

And shut up. Her voice is so annoying, dude.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah, it'll be really. If she does. That'll be really fun to see when she switches into her fake Bronx voice where she didn't grow up. Back to her very nice, privileged, wealthy suburban voice. Everything about these people is just disingenuous. They don't believe what they're saying. They don't believe there are concentration Camps on the southern border. They don't believe that Donald Trump is an actual Nazi, or they. They wouldn't be saying these things. No, they want power.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

If they did believe it, they would be taking action and actually physically fighting, which some people are believing.

[Host/Main Commentator]

And if you believe that your opposition are actual Nazis, you tend to lay

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

low because they tend to kill you.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Yeah, you're saying an awful lot for this country to be run by Nazis. Yeah, you wouldn't be saying anything. By the way, she said, if somebody has committed a crime in government, it's our job to say it. No, it's actually not your job to say it. It's somebody's job to prosecute it and prove it.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Right.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

You guys never do that. You don't do the proving part of this process. You don't need to when somebody's committing crime. And by the way, what crime has he committed for you to call him a Nazi or a fascist? I don't understand which crime would lead to that outcome.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Right.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

You're just throwing all this stuff together and hoping you guys know you don't have the balls to take up arms and go solve the problem that you're describing. You're just hoping. Stochastic terrorism. We talked about it yesterday. You're hoping somebody else does.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Let me tell you this. If I believe that there are actual concentration camps in the United States, meaning people are being put in internment camps and executed in the context that she used it, If I believe that there are actual concentration camps, if I believed that an actual National Socialist Party, like the Nazis committing a genocide, had attained power in the United States and they were killing American citizens in record numbers, I would take up arms and I would. I would engage in violence in the streets. I absolutely would.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah.

[Host/Main Commentator]

I would protect my neighbors.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah, I would.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

I'm so looking forward to January 2029, when someone else was sworn in the office and they go, good job, guys. We defeated fascism.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

When he relinquished power like a regular president.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah. No matter last time. Exactly.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Like he did last time when he thought the election was stolen from him. Like, all right, fine. I'll still leave.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

We did it, guys. We fought it and we won.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah. That's how you beat Nazis and fascists, is through the electoral process.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

They usually let that happen, don't they?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Exactly.

[Shopify/Mint Mobile Advertiser]

VRBO makes it easy to claim your dream summer spot with early booking deals from homes with pools to poolside lounges. When you book a vrbo, you don't have to reserve any loungers. They're all yours. All you have to do is book early book with vrbo.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

All right, let's go. You know, speaking of.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Speaking of a crime, Lee Zeldin with this Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro. I don't remember Lee Zeldin having this level of I don't give a crap anymore. I don't remember him being this intense. But this was an exchange regarding climate change and regarding his role at the EPA where she was not only out of her depth, but she appears like the demented old tries to be cool grandma that she is. And they might need to lock Lee Zeldin away for murder. Figuratively.

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

I'm shocked because the science tells us that climate change is real and accelerating and really the effects the impact of climate change on are real. When climate Rosa delirious, flooding our streets, poisoning our air and disaster, how can the EPA justify abandoning that duty to protect Americans to appease polluters?

[Host/Main Commentator]

I don't know how to explain your 19 bracelets following the law.

[EPA Representative]

Section 202 of the Clean Air Act. Where does it say anything about fighting global climate change? Loper Bright, Supreme Court case. You're familiar with it?

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

No, I. Maybe not, but let me ask.

[EPA Representative]

But that's really important. As a member of Congress, Loper Brait says that we as an agency don't have the authority to get Creative if section 202 of the Clean Air Act.

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

No, but you don't have. Excuse me. You do not have the right to say climate change does not exist, that it's a hoax and that's where this administration is coming.

[EPA Representative]

You're upset that you don't know what Loper Bright is. You know what the major policies doctrine is.

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

I'm upset because you know what the

[EPA Representative]

major policies doctrine is. You're a member of Congress. You should know.

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

Well, you're, you're. You're.

[Host/Main Commentator]

I'd like to put some paint cans in her hand because I could shake a couple of tones right now.

[EPA Representative]

The two biggest landmark Supreme Court cases of the last year, regards to your question.

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

Are very defensive about changing your live

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

look at my HOA meetings.

[EPA Representative]

You want me to tell you what the two biggest court cases are of the last few years?

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

This is what I want.

[EPA Representative]

Michigan versus epa.

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

Whoa.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

West Virginia money from us.

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

So halt for the second it and wait for the question and answer the question.

[EPA Representative]

I answered your question and you didn't like my answer because you don't know what Loper Bright is because you don't know what the major policies doctrine is. Because you. You're asking me. You're asking about section 202 of the Clean Air Act. And you don't. You don't read it. You don't know what it says.

[Host/Main Commentator]

By the way, if you're an old lady with liver spotted hands, this is not a good choice.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah, this.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Get off my bidet.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah, this looks like. You're not from this neighborhood.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah, you're not supposed to. That's my. That's my yard. And your curtains aren't the right color. Can we get hoa?

[Host/Main Commentator]

That brings us to this week's installment of climate claims. Needlessly dramatic, but then again, so is the left's rhetoric.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

No, it's not.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

So is Rosa delaura.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Chairman.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Chairman. Could you stop him from talking?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

I just love how he just.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Just cites a Supreme Court case.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

She's like, whoa, what is the Supreme Court?

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Is that like if they put sour cream and tomatoes on it?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

I was not told that we would be discussing stuff to climate change.

[Host/Main Commentator]

And we'll go through the claims, the truth and we'll provide you the references as we do every weekday, 11am Eastern. By the way, thank you for the raid, good sir. We'll be sending you on if you're not a rumble Premium member to Hailey Corona afterwards. So here's the claim. Let's break this down.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

The EPA is harming the people by not just play it.

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

The budget proposal reads like a climate change deniers manifesto. When climate change is flooding our streets, poisoning our air, driving up health care and disaster costs, how can the EPA justify abandoning that duty to protect Americans? To appease polluters under the false flag of economics?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Economic growth driving up health care. Now do obesity.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah, soda on snap. How's that Driving up healthcare costs?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

This is. They just.

[Host/Main Commentator]

They don't actually believe what they say.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

They're Marxist. It's all about.

[Host/Main Commentator]

All right, this person is in power at this point. They must be wrong. Let's pick this new pet product. I will say at least she practices what she preaches. As seen with her using zero carbon emission transportation to work. So that's good. I am. I'm grateful. I will say she's following a lot like Bernie. She kind of believes it. And it would seem like she's being super eco friendly at first glance, but the reality is she has no choice. She was arrested for a DUI last Halloween. Now, a little childish and stupid. Then again, so is that broad. Here's the truth, okay? The Trump administration is following the law, with which she is clearly not familiar. By reining in the epa, there is no law that authorizes the EPA to combat global climate change.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

And by the way, even if they

[Host/Main Commentator]

were permitted or authorized, which they're not,

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

they wouldn't be able to do a

[Host/Main Commentator]

damn thing about it anyway.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Have you seen coal usage?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Look at China on the graph. I don't have it here, but I'm sure you can take my word for it. And here's the thing. A lot of other leftists have flagrantly disregarded the law. So you've had them expand the EPA using what's been known as the Chevron defense. That's what he's actually citing there. So supreme court case in 2024 was Loper Bright Enterprises vs. Raimondo. It overturned the Chevron defense, which was used by leftists, and it allowed federal agencies to exploit vague laws, loopholes to expand their power to say, yeah, the epa, which is meant to regulate emissions so that, you know, you're not coughing if you live in a city. They should be able to hire Greta Thunberg as an ambassador to advocate for some international policy that we couldn't affect even if we tried.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Right. And basically that's what he asked her. Do you know about this case? Yes, because it is directly relevant to your question. Because you're asking me to do something that goes against the Supreme Court.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

And what she's really saying is you're not. The thing that you wrote, even though it's in line with the Supreme Court, isn't the way that I would. I don't like it. And so you, You're. You're, you're bad.

[Host/Main Commentator]

My mood ring doesn't know what to do.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

It is so fun to watch lawmakers learn about new laws.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

I know that. I know about.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yes. Noodles.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

I was just.

[Co-host/Panelist 4]

Because, hey, we're going to get to it in a minute. But you brought up the coal graph, so we'll.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Oh, there you go.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Look at China.

[Host/Main Commentator]

China is asshole.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

And they're doing really lots of coal.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yep. Lots of coal. Here's the next claim that she makes there. We wanted to break this down because it's great, it's entertaining. But more importantly, he's right. She says that the Trump administration, you know, to be fair, she didn't say Nazi, rapist, murderer, pedophile, whatever it is.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

There you go.

[Host/Main Commentator]

But they're harming the environment. They're killing.

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

This administration, however, is running the playbook on making the problem worse, focusing on policies that are handouts to the fossil fuel companies, like reversing the 2009 greenhouse gas endangerment finding, rolling back fuel emission standards for Motor vehicles and reducing methane leak monitoring requirements.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Okay, well, come on.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

That last one's obvious.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Here's. Here's the truth.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

This administration actually their EPA has a

[Host/Main Commentator]

lot of wins and I would just say protecting the environment, but protecting sort of your quality of air.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Now what she says, rolling back carbon

[Host/Main Commentator]

emission standards, things like cars requiring because of overreaching government in the past. That button that you hate, that auto shut off button, that idle button that by the way puts a bunch of wear and tear on your car. A bunch of things that were added that you didn't ask for because some bureaucrat decided that it was might affect the temperature rising 0.3 degrees over the next 100 years, if you believe it rolled back. Things like that. So that hopefully you can have more affordable vehicles or at least your commute doesn't have to be so annoying. The winds that they have are ones of actual significance. For example, tackling. They had the Tijuana sewage crisis that was, you know, directly affecting San Diego. They removed lead from drinking water. They cleaned up the PCB soil contamination that was going on. There's been a lot of restoring of the Great Lakes stuff that the lack of left complains about. And the right says, you know what, okay, there's something to be said for this. But now they just say, yeah, but you're not. But you still. You don't have all the cars, don't have all the things that we wanted. And Lee Zeldin, by the way, reminded DeLauro this was just funny not to drink the weed killer glycosphate. Glyphosate. He'll here you want to make the

[EPA Representative]

claim that we're just giving up on the work of the enforcement and compliance office. I say, is that your question?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

If your couple's folk.

[EPA Representative]

Glyphosate. I'm telling you as the administrative epa, don't drink it.

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

Thank you so much for agreeing to what we need.

[EPA Representative]

I don't know what the question was. You, you're holding up a cup saying glyphosate, you know, don't drink it, don't inject it.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

That is so embarrassing.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Or do what? I don't know.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Well, in case you guys are wondering if you. If a volley starts, you know and you, you attack, okay. And then they parry and they counter. A good comeback is never what with no follow up.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Just let you know.

[Host/Main Commentator]

You don't need to be overly concerned with optics, but it's a bad one.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Glyphate, I'm gonna use that against you.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Don't drink it. Glyphosate here's the next claim.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

And this is just what they do

[Host/Main Commentator]

is if you say, well, hold on a second, I just don't believe this is the appropriate role of this department, or I don't believe that it's the appropriate role of government, or I don't believe, for example, that some international climate summit to which people travel in a private jet is going to solve this problem. They say, well, you're just a science denier. Science denier. Science denier. You deny climate change, period.

[Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro]

No, no. But you don't have. Excuse me, you do not have the right to say climate change does not exist, that it's a hoax. And that's where this administration.

[EPA Representative]

You're upset.

[Host/Main Commentator]

So here's the truth. He does have the right to say that. He never did say that. Here's Zeldin acknowledging climate change, but clarifying that it's the alarmism he doesn't agree with.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Right here.

[Guest/Caller 3]

Do you agree with President Elect Trump that climate change is a hoax?

[EPA Representative]

Well, first off, Senator, it was great to meet with you as well. I believe that climate change is real. As I told you, as far as President Trump goes, the context that I have heard him speak about it was with a criticism of policies that have been acted because of climate change. And I think that he's concerned about the economic costs of some policies where there's a debate and a difference of opinion parties.

[Guest/Caller 3]

I would respectfully disagree with you.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Now, when the left, here's the. Whatever the left says, it's nuanced. That means they don't know what they're talking about and they're about to lie to you. In my experience, often, and I've seen this too, as an employer, but also in debates, if someone gives an overly complicated answer or an overly complicated solution to a relatively, let's say, straightforward problem or a question, it usually means they don't know what they're doing or they're trying to present it as overly complicated in the hopes that you don't understand what they're saying. And they can claim that they know more than you. That right there was a very reasonable answer, by the way. It's the answer that most Americans share or many certainly.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah, okay.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Climate changes, and maybe humans are contributing to it. That's a lot of Americans.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

As to whether it's going to be

[Host/Main Commentator]

catastrophic and as to whether these policies will make a difference, I don't think so. That's an entirely reasonable position. They label that as you don't believe in science. And if you want to talk about myths. I mean, we can go through and

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

we'll do this tomorrow.

[Host/Main Commentator]

An Inconvenient Truth.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

I had to watch that.

[Host/Main Commentator]

That was curriculum when I was in school. A British high court ruled nine significant errors. And Al Gore has now come out with a new prediction.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Let me ask you this.

[Host/Main Commentator]

We're going to cover this tomorrow because it's important. And by the way, the public perception has shifted on climate change. Rightfully so. When you think Al Gore. Inconvenient Truth. Did you see that film? Okay, pause it. If you're not watching this live, I want you to think in your mind, what kind of predictions did he make back then? It was global warming. Climate change wasn't the only term used. Okay, Global warming, Inconvenient Truth. Picture his predictions. Okay, comment below. All right, so what would you think his new prediction is?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Would you have guessed New ice age? What? Cause that's where he is now.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Well, he hardly grifted through all the hot stuff. Yeah, yeah, Warming business. He's already. Well, I already exhausted all those news.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Matter of fact, I remember back then when he was talking about how the Earth was going to be this hellscape and people going, well, didn't.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Didn't a lot of scientists predict an ice age?

[Host/Main Commentator]

As a matter of fact, there was a whole documentary, and I think Leonard Nimoy actually narrated it, and they go,

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

oh, that's a Reddit.

[Host/Main Commentator]

That was never actually mainstream. Well, here they are now. A new ice age.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

How do you guys not get it right ever? How do you not even get it close?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Like, it's not, hey, we think that Florida won't be here by the year. Whatever it was, 2014 or Cape Cod, they made a bunch of predictions that never came true. And then it turns out that it's a year late. It's.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

We're not gonna have crops because it's

[Host/Main Commentator]

going to be sweltering.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Hell, did I say that?

[Host/Main Commentator]

I meant ice age.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

I don't know how they get there, but they just keep trying and people keep buying it. People just keep lapping it up because they're like, yeah, of course. Climate change, climate denier.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Well, it's the same thing I was talking about earlier with the, the whole fascist thing in 2029. Then they go, look, we beat fascism. That's what they do with this. They go, yeah, of course there's more polar bears than ever. It's because we made that movie. We made people aware.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Right?

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

And that's why we're heroes.

[Host/Main Commentator]

We did it.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Killing machine that nature has ever Devised on land, survived.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

We saved the Earth so much. Now it's going in reverse direction and it's gonna be an ice age.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yes. I don't understand how anyone can genuinely. How can. Let's say that you believe climate change is real. Humans are the sole or primary contributor to it. This is a real question. And you believe it's going to have catastrophic results. Okay, I don't go along with the catastrophic results, just to be clear. And I don't even know that humans are the primary contributor, let alone soul. I think we are a contributor. I think we are one of many contributors. That's where I line up. And you may say that that means I deny climate change. Okay, fine. But let's assume you accept all of those. Why would you trust the left to handle it? If you had someone inspect your house, say, you know what? We have to come in. You're gonna need a $20,000 termite treatment. That's why your house is all lopsided. They perform it. Then you find out there are no termites. They go, oh, sorry, your foundation shifted. Actually had nothing to do with termites. Termites. And they send you another bill for $20,000 saying they would fix it.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Wouldn't you get a second opinion? And they say, well, why don't you trust us? Because you charged me $20,000 for termites that didn't exist. You said hot hellscape, and now you're saying ice age. If it's ice age, I'm probably going

[Host/Main Commentator]

to go with the people who said an ice age was more likely than the heat.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

And when are we invading China? Because none of this matters. The entire world, every single country on the planet, can sign on and do the most draconian restrictions you can possibly think of, and it won't make one bit of difference if China doesn't change.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Here's a global coal consumption right there. 55% China, 13% India, United States, 4.8%. Just to be clear.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

It just doesn't matter.

[Host/Main Commentator]

There's nothing. There's. If every single one of you started driving electric cars, using one square of toilet paper, carpooling, it would have zero discernible effect. Yeah. Do you understand that? Because China, and by the way, Carney in Canada, and these global leaders from the left, they say we need to create stronger alliances with China. That's where they ignore the climate change. And again, you're going, wait, hold on a second. How can that be logically consistent?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

It's not.

[Host/Main Commentator]

They're not trying to be. They're Marxists. Economically, the United States is more successful than China. Therefore, they are the oppressor. China is the oppressor. Never mind that China has actual slave labor. Even economically, the good guy in comparison to China, not saying perfect, would be the United States.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

And then they just ignore it when

[Host/Main Commentator]

it comes to emissions, when it comes to pollution.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Why?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Because America bad.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

America bad.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Even though America has far more renewable energy, even though America has far cleaner emission standards, even though America has been far more effective in cleaning up some economic catastrophes, and China doesn't care. America bad. Because America is the global leader, therefore we side with China. It's that simple. Are you guys starting to get the picture? If you're trying to make sense of it any other way, you can't. And I would gladly anyone qualified debate that issue. The logical consistency of the left. How the left, for example, can support from the river to the sea while flying an LGBTQ Gestapo flag. How the left can say that we need to expand the reach of the EPA and give them control over your personal decisions as it relates to climate change, while demanding stronger alliances with China, whatever it is. How they can demand women's rights and talk about rape culture and say that these Islamic countries are beautiful and all cultures are equal. The logical consistency of the left. I don't mean some X poster with a generic avatar on there. The logical consistency of the left. There is no other way to make sense of it other than Marxism. Change my mind, you guys let me know. And I'm not gonna debate someone who's called for my death.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Just.

[Host/Main Commentator]

That's my line. People who call for violence against all political opposition, that's a no. That's a hard pass.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Why?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Because I don't want them to be around me?

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

No, I think that's a very reasonable line to have. When's Greta Thunberg's flotilla arriving in China?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Right. Good point.

[Co-host/Panelist 4]

You think she.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

She hasn't gone there once, has she? I mean, I don't.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Oh, I like her. She have the same haircut.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Also because of genetic mutation, have a tiny fee.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

You put her in a factory.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Oh, that little boy be good in a factory.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

How dare you? We chain him to a room only let him have a piss break every 12 hours. Thank a God for Marco Carney. Who is Satan?

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

It's theater that kills people. By the way. Are you referencing what I pointed at a minute ago?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Jimmy Kimmel? Someone with the fcc?

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Yeah, it looks like the fcc. At least this is the headline. So maybe our research team, if you guys can tell us what's really going on. It says the FCC is looking at the ABC licenses amidst this kind of kerfuffle with Kimmel. I don't know if it is because of, or if this was already a process was in motion. Obviously if it was in response to his joke, we would be against that.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yes.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Like, come on. I understand people don't like jokes. Sometimes he's come out and explain it. But like, we, we have a pretty hard line here.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah, we wouldn't like that if they did it to us.

[Host/Main Commentator]

No. Yeah, no. Jimmy Kimmel is definitely, definitely dishonest. He, he is not a good faith actor.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

We're not fans.

[Host/Main Commentator]

But I will say my interpretation of the joke was that, you know, Donald Trump, President Trump is much older than Melania. I think it was distasteful, but I don't think that the guy should lose his ability to perform comedy if people want to watch. Now, the issue may be quite a bit more complicated than that because it was misrepresented last time with the fcc. I just forgot the name of the guy who was the FCC chairman who spoke out. What a lot of people don't understand about this is something like a show with abc, right. They have a lot of affiliates. They're syndicated. And so these affiliates in many cases have to carry Jimmy Kimmel. It's part of the package that they sort of get and they post a 0.0 rating. So if Jimmy Kimmel keeps crapping on the American voting base, Right. He's not performing well, say in Kansas City or in Tulsa. And these local affiliates, a lot of them are like, we have to get out of this. We don't want to air this. We want to be able to air whatever we need to air. So we don't post a 0.0 and have to fire everybody. And then pressure is exerted and then of course, lawyers are involved. So it's quite a bit more complicated than just FCC wants to pull Jimmy Kimmel. That's how it was before. I don't know what's going on right now. Why don't you care about the little guy? They should have the right to run a business. Haven't people talked about the importance of local broadcasting? Or is that only NPR when it's federally funded?

[Co-host/Panelist 4]

Brendan Carr.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Brendan Carr. Yeah, that's it. I was. There's so many cars. Allen Carr. Jimmy Carr.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

So we'll see what happens with that.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah, maybe research can kind of help get that. Get that to me, this next thing now, just so you know, I was instructed not to watch this.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

And you prevented everyone else in this room before.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Before being on air. So I have no idea where this segment is gonna go.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

You know where it's gonna go. It's gonna piss you off. That's where it's gonna go.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah, people here really enjoy that. They enjoy getting a rise out of me. And it's not healthy. It's not a healthy way to live. But I'm okay with it this so. And in case we have to leave during the middle of a clip, if you are not yet, by the way, a Rumble Premium member, consider clicking that button below. Rumble Premium is Mug Club. Mug Club is rumble premium. It's $99 a year. You get this wonderful hand dash mug 100% more show along with all the content you see. Ad free. It's your best one stop shop.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Oh, and by the way, if not,

[Host/Main Commentator]

hey, you take a multivitamin, take the best one in the world. It's the only other company I run, foundationdaily.com. you get 40% off lab tested, fully transparent clinical ingredients that are clinically effective at the clinical dosage. Because so many supplement companies are full of crap. So either way, that's how you keep the lights on. And we're not funded by a foreign caliphate. That's fun. Next thing. Ellen Page, point of privilege. Yes.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

It's Ethan now.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Ethan.

[Host/Main Commentator]

It's no longer Elliot.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Oh, you said. You said Ellen.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

I did say Ellen.

[Host/Main Commentator]

And now he hit him with now she says Elliot.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Oh, what did I say?

[Host/Main Commentator]

He said Ethan. Oh, you're thinking mission impossible.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Either way, it's not a guy.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah, yeah, I deserve it.

[Host/Main Commentator]

You're thinking mission impossible. Dark gashing, not fair protocol.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

My point is. Stop misgendering. I misnamed, but I got the right gender.

[Host/Main Commentator]

That's true.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

I'm a good person.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah, you are a good person. I readily admit that I'm not. Some of you say Elliot. Some of you say Ethan.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

I just say Ellen. Why? Because I feel like it.

[Host/Main Commentator]

So Ellen Page put out a documentary and as I understand it, it's called Second Nature and it's about sodomite animals.

[Documentary Narrator]

Homosexual behavior in nature is one of the best. Secrets is absolutely everywhere.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

What are you gay?

[Documentary Narrator]

Have homosexual sex all the time? Penguins are par. Bond with members of the same. Same sex too.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

And don't produce that.

[Documentary Narrator]

Black swans gray.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

They're not capable of spoken language.

[Host/Main Commentator]

How did you get them to do that? They show them a video of you.

[Guest/Caller 3]

Not only do many species illustrate homosexuality and gender multiplicity, they also illustrate.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Pause.

[Guest/Caller 3]

What was that?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Am I supposed to go along with this.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Is this, like. This is one of those things?

[Host/Main Commentator]

The funniest. If we can pull this one time with that. That Elizabeth Holmes documentary.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Yeah.

[Host/Main Commentator]

It's the hardest I ever laughed on air. And they just. They're interviewing people. Was it Theranos? They're interviewing people, talking about it. They're talking about working with Elizabeth Holmes.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

And then all of a sudden, we're just supposed to be like, oh, yeah, sure.

[Host/Main Commentator]

It's this monstrosity. Female to male, quote, unquote, transgender.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

And he's just. He's just thrown in there.

[Host/Main Commentator]

He's like, yeah, you know, I was

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

the only one who was willing to stick up to her because I wasn't scared. You're a man, and we're just supposed to watch it. You're like, yeah, of course. Of course. Yeah.

[Host/Main Commentator]

This person. No, this scientist knows about animals that engage in. In rectal friction.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Let's just continue.

[Guest/Caller 3]

Yeah, Multiplicity. They also illustrate sex.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

They can't do math.

[Guest/Caller 3]

Where females change to become males, for example, or males to females.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Biologists now know sexuality is fluid and that all of that is normal.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Shut up. They put an elephant diversity on the elephant clip.

[Documentary Narrator]

Need to know these stories so we can make.

[Host/Main Commentator]

All right, hold on a second. I see a lot of hands going up in the studio. Everyone shut up. Because I didn't watch this. I'll tell you the problem with this, okay? It's sort of an equivalent to the natural thousand. Well, animals do this, and it's normal.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Now show us where when two male

[Host/Main Commentator]

lions get into a fight, it's not just to the death. The male lion, who is the victor,

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

kills all of the other male lions. Are they cubs?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Cubs. Because they're eliminating the bloodline. It's normal. It's.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Now show us how dolphins gang rape for fun. Just because animals do it.

[Host/Main Commentator]

It's just like vegetarians. They used to this.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

They go, you know, you don't need all that protein. Look at gorillas. I just eat. Well, I'm not a gorilla, Doug.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Dogs are gay. So we could be gay, too. Yeah, we licks his asshole, too. Yeah. I don't think he minds a little gay sex.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

I mean, it's just. Yeah, I don't think you may. Yeah, you have the wrong dog.

[Host/Main Commentator]

If your couch is velour, forget about it.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

That's a wonderland. So they just do it. Animals do it. So, you know, cows only eat grass. I don't care. That has nothing to do with me. They do it to push some diet. They do it to Push some social agenda. And then in the same breath, they'll go, and we're not animals. Well, which is it?

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

I would love to see one of these narrators talking about the monkeys having gay sex. And then just in the middle of it, one of the camera guys throws shit. Shit in their face and goes. You go, what happened?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah, what happened to me too? You know how male sea otters pick their mates? I know.

[Host/Main Commentator]

On Buzzfeed. Yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

They're holding hands.

[Host/Main Commentator]

No, he bites her.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

That's why he has claws. That's why he asks. Barbed claws.

[Host/Main Commentator]

One of the reasons. The most fun reason.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

So she can't get away. He goes, yeah, I don't care about consent. Is this convincing anybody?

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

And like the praying mantis, women should be allowed to kill their mate after sex.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Does a praying mantis do that?

[Host/Main Commentator]

I know the black widow does that.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

The black man. The praying mantis does something like that. I was close. Yeah, I was close.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Oh, my God. This. And here's. Here's the. And I want to go to unit. This is obviously aimed at children or grown adults who think like children. Right. This is how they propagate.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Oh, my God.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Animals do it. Well, then I guess it's good to. You're not an animal.

[Host/Main Commentator]

You are not.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

You are not an animal.

[Host/Main Commentator]

You don't resemble them in biology. Oh, look, my food is gay.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Yeah.

[Host/Main Commentator]

What? I guess this.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

I guess this Salisbury stank has committed a hate crime. I'm gay too now.

[Guest/Caller 1]

What?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Does it rub off on me?

[Host/Main Commentator]

I'm sure I can dilute it if I put some melted cheese on it.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

What?

[Host/Main Commentator]

Noodles.

[Co-host/Panelist 4]

She brought up that animals can change their sex in nature. Yeah. It's not because. It's not because they're not happy with the body.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 4]

It's because it's their only option to propagate their species when there is only one sex in their immediate vicinity.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 4]

So it's for repurp or repopulation purposes.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

What animals do. That was like a seahorse.

[Co-host/Panelist 4]

Like, there are a few different amphibians.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

Amphibians.

[Co-host/Panelist 4]

Yeah.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

It's not like they go to their amphibious doctor. Yeah, exactly like, I'm unhappy. Can you Change my parts, Dr. Frank?

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Cause do away with my testicles. It's just like this.

[Host/Main Commentator]

Is this convincing anybody? This is the level of argumentation we can expect from the left. And Elliot Page has been very clear. Look, Elliot Page, Ellen Page is a very damaged person. Obviously you don't do this unless there's something wrong. And my heart goes out to this person. My heart doesn't go out to the people who enable that person and know that it's wrong. This is going to go down as a very, very dark period in human history where we allow children to be mutilated. And make no mistake, that's what this is about. This is about getting to the point like you just saw. Let's bring this up. David Cross on Bill Maher. You know, I'm no fan of Bill Maher, but he called him to the mat on that, where he's like, yeah, a trans kid who was nine and then one who was three.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

Just acting like it's normal. We're supposed to go along with it. Yeah, yeah, okay, sure.

[Host/Main Commentator]

This is about indoctrinating your children and making sure that it's all declared a fundamental human right. They're even making the case it's rooted in natural rights because look at nature, animals. Here's a big difference too. The way that conservatives, the way that traditional Christian conservatives especially view the world is we are very different from the animals. We are uniquely set apart from the animals. Why? Because we have the ability to rationalize. Because we have self awareness. Because we are the only species that have these conversations.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

I don't care what the sonar, what the whales says.

[Host/Main Commentator]

They're not discussing the ethical nature of how to consume or process animals. We are different. The left doesn't believe that. The left believes that you should be reduced to your base animal instinct. Here are some highlights again that I have not seen. We're going to continue on Rumble Premium because I'm sure we're going to light off a big old mouth cannon and let it rip. Highlights from the gay animal movie as I'm calling it Faggot Animals to this project as narrator and producer. Gosh. Well, I think I watched. Gross. I mean, I learned so much.

[Co-host/Panelist 3]

Absolutely.

[Co-host/Panelist 2]

I can't.

[Co-host/Panelist 1]

It's logic.