Donald Trump vs. Elon Musk: The Massive Battle Over the Big Beautiful Bill

Summary

Podcast Summary: Donald Trump vs. Elon Musk: The Massive Battle Over the Big Beautiful Bill

Podcast Information:

• Title: Louder with Crowder
• Host: Steven Crowder
• Episode: Donald Trump vs. Elon Musk: The Massive Battle Over the Big Beautiful Bill
• Release Date: June 4, 2025
• Description: Steven Crowder delivers a politically charged show encompassing news, entertainment, and politics, featuring guests, rants, sketches, and audience interactions.

---

1. Introduction: Setting the Stage

The episode opens with Steven Crowder announcing a special segment titled "Rumble lineup live," emphasizing the significance of the discussion by highlighting a conflict with Elon Musk, whom he describes as "the world's wealthiest man" and accuses of being a fraud. Crowder sets the tone for a confrontational episode centered around Musk's opposition to the proposed fiscal legislation.

Key Quote:

Crowder [00:00]: "Elon Musk is lying to you. Elon Musk is, I would argue, a fraud. And I'll make an irrefutable case."

2. The Big Beautiful Bill: Overview and Provisions

Crowder delves into the specifics of the "big beautiful bill," outlining its fiscal impact over a decade. He emphasizes the bill's aim to cut $1.6 trillion in mandatory spending compared to Dogecoin's (DOGE) proposed $180 billion cuts, noting that only 30% of DOGE's figures have been substantiated.

Key Points:

• Spending Cuts: $1.6 trillion over 10 years.
• DOGE's Proposal: $180 billion cuts with limited receipts.
• Bill Type: Reconciliation bill focusing on mandatory spending without addressing discretionary spending areas like education and military, except for specific allocations.

Key Quote:

Crowder [02:00]: "We're going to get into the big beautiful bill, what can be done and what cannot be done through the process of reconciliation versus an annual budget bill."

3. Elon Musk's Opposition: Unpacking the Critique

Elon Musk's dissatisfaction with the bill is a central theme. Crowder analyzes Musk's public statements, suggesting that Musk finds the bill insufficient compared to his own proposed cuts. Crowder challenges Musk's credibility by highlighting discrepancies between the proposed $1.6 trillion cuts and DOGE's $180 billion, labeling Musk's stance as self-serving.

Key Quotes:

Crowder [04:44]: "Elon Musk is mad saying that this bill has a bunch of pork. That's the reason he's mad."

Crowder [22:26]: "Musk wanted the FAA to use Starlink, but that wasn't allowed because of a conflict of interest."

4. The Unlikely Alliance: Musk, Rand Paul, Thomas Massie, and Jack Dorsey

Crowder discusses the unexpected coalition of Elon Musk with politicians Rand Paul and Thomas Massie, alongside Jack Dorsey, in opposing the bill. He scrutinizes Jack Dorsey's involvement, referencing Dorsey's past actions like de-platforming Donald Trump, and questions the alignment of their motivations, especially regarding AI and intellectual property concerns.

Key Points:

• Rand Paul: Criticizes the bill for increasing the debt ceiling by $5 trillion.
• Thomas Massie: Aligns with Rand Paul on fiscal concerns.
• Jack Dorsey: Former CEO of Twitter, involved in policy decisions against Trump, now partnering with Musk in this context.

Key Quote:

Crowder [26:53]: "Jack Dorsey saying a Rand Paul Thomas Massie ticket. And just to be clear, this is the same Jack Dorsey who supported the de-platforming of Donald Trump."

5. Renaming of the Navy Ship: A DEI Controversy

A significant portion of the discussion centers on Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's decision to rename the Navy ship previously named after Harvey Milk, a gay civil rights activist. Crowder criticizes the renaming initiative, framing it as part of a broader DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) purge. He challenges the historical significance of Harvey Milk, alleging misconduct, and extrapolates the implications of such renamings on other historical figures like Harriet Tubman and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Key Points:

• Current Scenario: Renaming USNS Harvey Milk to reflect current political priorities.
• Historical Accuracy Questioned: Crowder claims Milk had an "less than honorable discharge" and alleged inappropriate relationships.
• Broader Implications: Suggests a trend of renaming significant historical symbols based on contemporary agendas.

Key Quotes:

Crowder [09:35]: "Harvey Milk was a Navy veteran who served in the Korean War, and he was the first honorable dish man elected into public office in California, Right?"

Crowder [10:13]: "Today Gerald's a Pew boat captain."

6. Fiscal Policy Debate: Reconciliation vs. Annual Budget Bills

Crowder provides an in-depth explanation of the differences between reconciliation bills and annual budget bills. He emphasizes that the current bill is designed to bypass partisan gridlock by focusing solely on mandatory spending, excluding discretionary areas unless specifically allowed under reconciliation rules. This strategy aims to achieve significant fiscal cuts without requiring broad bipartisan support.

Key Points:

• Reconciliation Bill: Targets mandatory spending; limited flexibility.
• Annual Budget Bill: Includes discretionary spending; requires 60 votes, leading to potential compromises.
• Strategic Advantage: Reconciliation allows passage with a simple majority, avoiding the need for Democratic support.

Key Quote:

Crowder [08:50]: "This is a reconciliation bill. It's not an appropriations bill like an annual budget bill."

7. Elon Musk's Personal and Business Interests

Crowder speculates on Musk's motivations, suggesting personal and business interests influencing his stance. He points out that the bill's termination of electric vehicle (EV) tax credits adversely affects Musk's Tesla, potentially reducing his company's earnings by 52%. Additionally, Crowder mentions conflicts of interest related to FAA contracts and Starlink.

Key Points:

• EV Tax Credits: Bill proposes to terminate existing credits benefiting electric vehicle manufacturers.
• Impact on Tesla: Estimated significant decrease in earnings due to loss of subsidies.
• Starlink Contracts: Musk's efforts to integrate Starlink with FAA were reportedly blocked, fueling his opposition.

Key Quotes:

Crowder [31:06]: "This bill would decrease Tesla's earnings by 52%."

Crowder [31:50]: "This is the guy who did do well. He did carry out the will of the Brazilian government."

8. Nala Ray and TPUSA: Scrutinizing Authenticity and Leadership

The episode shifts focus to Nala Ray, a former porn star turned Christian course creator who is set to speak at TPUSA's Young Women's Leadership Summit. Crowder and his co-hosts express skepticism about her sincerity, highlighting her past deceptions and current monetization through Christian courses. They debate the appropriateness of her leadership role within conservative Christian circles, questioning the integrity necessary for such positions.

Key Points:

• Nala Ray's Background: Former adult content creator with a significant social media presence.
• Current Role: Selling Christian courses post-conversion, raising doubts about authenticity.
• Ethical Concerns: Balancing forgiveness with discernment in leadership appointments within religious organizations.

Key Quotes:

Crowder [46:12]: "Can someone come in and sit in class? Is it okay to say, yeah? Yeah, you're welcome in the class."

Crowder [52:18]: "She immediately started selling merch. It's like the moment she became a Christian. Profit. Profit off sex. Profit off Christians."

9. Concluding Remarks and Audience Engagement

The hosts wrap up the discussion by reiterating their stance against the bill, emphasizing the need for significant fiscal responsibility. They encourage listeners to engage with their content on Rumble Premium, highlighting the platform's commitment to free speech and independent content creation. The episode ends with a humorous exchange about lost breakfast burritos and a brief mention of upcoming segments, maintaining the show's characteristic blend of serious discourse and light-hearted banter.

Key Quote:

Crowder [45:31]: "So we're good. Really quickly, we do have the clip for you of Donald Trump talking about cutting the tax or the, the EV credits."

---

Notable Quotes and Attributions

• Steven Crowder [00:00]: "Elon Musk is lying to you. Elon Musk is, I would argue, a fraud."
• Steven Crowder [04:44]: "Elon Musk is mad saying that this bill has a bunch of pork."
• Steven Crowder [09:35]: "Harvey Milk was a Navy veteran who served in the Korean War..."
• Steven Crowder [31:06]: "This bill would decrease Tesla's earnings by 52%."
• Nala Ray [50:35]: "I've never started a ministry on your website."
• Rand Paul [26:53]: "We can still be friends and have a disagreement."

---

Key Themes and Insights

1. Fiscal Conservatism vs. Practicality: The hosts advocate for significant spending cuts and are critical of any bill that doesn't align with their stringent fiscal conservative principles. They champion the reconciliation process as a strategic means to bypass bipartisan obstacles, though acknowledging its limitations.

2. Personal Interests and Policy Influence: Crowder emphasizes how personal and corporate interests, exemplified by Elon Musk's business ventures, can influence public policy debates. The intertwining of Musk’s business interests with legislative matters is portrayed as a self-serving maneuver rather than a principled stance.

3. DEI and Historical Revisionism: The renaming of military assets to align with contemporary DEI initiatives is criticized as a form of historical revisionism. The discussion reflects a broader concern among some conservatives about the preservation of historical legacies and skepticism towards recent DEI-driven changes.

4. Authenticity in Leadership: The segment on Nala Ray raises questions about the criteria for leadership within conservative and religious communities. It underscores the tension between embracing individuals with diverse backgrounds and maintaining standards of authenticity and integrity.

5. Media and Content Creation: The promotion of Rumble Premium and the critique of platforms like X (formerly Twitter) highlight ongoing debates about media ownership, content censorship, and the role of alternative platforms in shaping political discourse.

---

Conclusion

In this episode of "Louder with Crowder," Steven Crowder and his co-hosts engage in a multifaceted discussion addressing significant fiscal legislation, personal rivalries with high-profile figures like Elon Musk, and ethical considerations within conservative movements. Through incisive critiques and detailed analyses, the hosts advocate for stringent fiscal policies while questioning the motivations and authenticity of influential opponents. The episode encapsulates ongoing debates within American conservatism, blending policy discourse with cultural and ethical considerations.

Transcript

[Steven Crowder]

Welcome to the Rumble lineup live, 9am now through 7pm Eastern, starting next week. I'm gonna keep this short and sweet because it's not every day that you pick a fight with the world's wealthiest man ever, let alone one who claims to be amongst your ranks. Elon Musk is lying to you. Elon Musk is, I would argue, a fraud. And I'll make an irrefutable case. Let's get to the show.

[Gerald Morgan]

Viewer discretion is advised.

[Steven Crowder]

Bad girls what you want, what you want what you want them to do when they show.

[Josh Firestein]

Bad girls, bad girls.

[Steven Crowder]

What you gonna do? Whatcha gonn when they come for you Bad girls, bad girls what you gonna do? What you gonna do when they come for you?

[Gerald Morgan]

Feminist Cops is filmed on location with the brave, strong women of law enforcement.

[Steven Crowder]

All suspects are innocent until proven guilty.

[Gerald Morgan]

In a court of law.

[Steven Crowder]

Hi, officer. Is there a problem?

[Female Officer]

Yeah. Do you know how fast you're going there, sir?

[Steven Crowder]

No, I'm sorry, I don't.

[Gerald Morgan]

Geez, do you let anyone on the force these days?

[Female Officer]

Excuse me? I met the PT requirements. I did a 30 second dead hang.

[Steven Crowder]

Okay, I'm sorry. Just.

[Gerald Morgan]

You're really small, but I mean, you're very pretty.

[Female Officer]

Watch it. I can do 40 push ups.

[Steven Crowder]

Are those male push ups or girl push ups?

[Female Officer]

You pig. I can't believe you asked me that.

[Steven Crowder]

Are you a natural brunette?

[Female Officer]

Are you a natural jerk? Okay, that is it. I'm gonna go get my supervisor.

[Gerald Morgan]

Is your supervisor male or female?

[Female Officer]

Oh, you wait here. You just wait here.

[Steven Crowder]

Bad girls, bad girl Go. What you going to do? What you going to do? For you. Click Rumble Premium and join now for 99 annually or $9.99 a month to get the entirely ad free experience and an ever expanding roster of content creators and free speech. Yeah, I know. We kind of stuck the landing right there in the cold open. By the way, just to be clear, I know that Speaker Johnson is on television right now and hey, I'm not tossing my lot in with this guy. Just to be clear, before you go, Rhino, I have consistently said we don't have a taxation problem. We have a spending problem. I get it. I don't want to raise the debt ceiling. I get it, okay? Rhinos create gridlock. I get it. But we need to be honest about what is taking place here. And I'll just give you two numbers. We're going to get into the big beautiful bill, what can be done and what cannot be done through the process of reconciliation versus an annual budget bill. And here's 1.9 trillion over 10 years in cuts with this bill. Is it perfect? No. Is it a start? Yeah. Doge, everything they found collectively $180 billion. Only receipts for 30% of it. What's Elon mad about? I think it's pretty self serving. And I think when people muddy the waters with a self serving agenda now, it makes it a lot harder to talk about fiscal responsibility in the government. So let's try and be really objective about this. We're going to discuss also renaming the gay ships from Pete Hegseth. And today is about gimmickry. It's about fraud. We'll get to Nala Rae speaking at TP USA at the end of this show. Former. And by former I mean like a few months ago. Massively famous porn star who will now send you her custom Christian courses. So let me ask you, where do you line up on this big beautiful bill, huh? Is it just rhino and the Savior, Elon, or is there something in between? It's a weekday show, 11am Eastern. CEO Captain Morgan. How are you?

[Gerald Morgan]

I'm well. Who knew that the least controversial part of the show is the ship named after a pedophile.

[Steven Crowder]

Yes, allegedly.

[Gerald Morgan]

Allegedly pedophile.

[Steven Crowder]

Allegedly. Allegedly. And by that we mean notable gay man who used poppers. Absolutely. A pedophile. That's what I'm saying. And July 9th at the funny Bone Comedy Club. Oh, in Hartford, Connecticut.

[Unknown]

Yeah.

[Steven Crowder]

Mr. Josh Firestein. How are you, sir?

[Josh Firestein]

I'm good.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, yeah, I'm good. Last time I was in Hartford, the club was River City Steam. And Stuart Scott from ESPN came up. Oh, really? In the green room afterwards. And I didn't know who he was because I just come in from Canada.

[Josh Firestein]

Oh, what a bummer. That guy's cool.

[Gerald Morgan]

That sounds like a gay bar. River City Steam.

[Steven Crowder]

I don't know, but they had good jump.

[Josh Firestein]

We haven't all been there like you, Gerald.

[Gerald Morgan]

I'm just guessing.

[Steven Crowder]

All right. Hartford, by the way, it sounds really nice. Incredibly violent city.

[Josh Firestein]

Well, it's technically in Manchester, so it's outside the city.

[Steven Crowder]

Good for you.

[Josh Firestein]

You guys can come. It's not dangerous.

[Steven Crowder]

All right, good.

[Josh Firestein]

It's not dangerous at all.

[Steven Crowder]

Go show them you love them. We're talking about. We're talking about gimmickry today. Also. Let me just issue this caveat. I'm a very, very imperfect Christian, okay? To be clear, as a matter of fact, I keep my faith pretty private. And I encourage you to read your Bible and I encourage you to seek out authoritative sources and submit yourself to the authority Of a church, because I am deathly terrified of leading someone astray. Because I've been a Christian pretty much my whole adult life, and I know that I only know enough to be dangerous. That's my opinion of myself. And I research and spend a lot of time. So before you throw that out there, it's not lost on me that I do naughty things quite often. All right. Speaking of Christian gimmickry, you ever wonder what it's like to go to a crazy church in India? The answer is no.

[Gerald Morgan]

No.

[Steven Crowder]

By the way, this is the ryobi chur. Yeah.

[Josh Firestein]

They're electric.

[Gerald Morgan]

It's the next one. Watch this. Next. Not that. Oh.

[Josh Firestein]

40 volts. Oh. Whoa. Hey.

[Steven Crowder]

Oh. So clean. This isn't.

[Josh Firestein]

These aren't Christians. That's the Hindu shake.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah. It's hard for me to tell the difference between Bollywood dancing and standard Christian Indian dancing. This is Christian.

[Gerald Morgan]

I hate this stuff.

[Steven Crowder]

Is it a Christian church?

[Nala Ray]

No.

[Steven Crowder]

That's right.

[Josh Firestein]

It's not.

[Steven Crowder]

I'm sorry.

[Josh Firestein]

I love that their clothes are the same color as their food.

[Gerald Morgan]

It's the church of Jesus. Jesus in Rajasthan.

[Steven Crowder]

Is it a Christian church? I don't know.

[Gerald Morgan]

The name is in there. That's about all I know.

[Steven Crowder]

Well, wait, hold on a second. It's not even this. So some of them stand upright and do the pogo?

[Gerald Morgan]

Well, it depends.

[Josh Firestein]

Is this guy Electro from Spider Man?

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah. There's a real problem going on, and we're joking about it. Geez.

[Steven Crowder]

This is the thing, too. Hey, what just happened to, like. Like, reading the Bible and following the teachings? Why do we got to do this? It's. It's. The guy just. He watched a couple Benny Hinn videos, and it is our fault. And this is. This is the problem with people on a platform who haven't grown in their faith yet. We end up with too much gimmickry. It's like. You know what we really need? We need people to move around like fish.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yes.

[Steven Crowder]

We need electricity.

[Gerald Morgan]

They're like, no, no, no. Snake handling's been done. We're doing train handling.

[Steven Crowder]

That's right.

[Gerald Morgan]

You're not winning. The trains are winning.

[Steven Crowder]

Looks exhausting. Almost like it could be an Indian workout. What you missed.

[Gerald Morgan]

He was perfectly fine until the guy touched him and then, boom. Worko.

[Josh Firestein]

That guy's a de.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah. Oh, gosh.

[Gerald Morgan]

I hate those churches. Can we stop this, please? What part of the Bible are you reading when you see that? That's normal.

[Josh Firestein]

I want to see their communion. What does that involve? Just some guy slap some stuff on a Plate.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah. I have no idea. Yeah. Did you get it from a street vendor? Yes, exactly. Yeah. He's making Turkish coffee, and it's hot sand. Go 50 cents. Why? I thought communion was free. No, that's the Catholics now. A lot of progress being made across the country by the way. You progress by downloading the Rumble app and following us there. That's the best way to stay in touch. It's a live show, 11am Eastern, but you are notified when we are live. And you can listen to it on audio and you can listen to the archive. It's the best way to go. One stop shop. Let's go to the Navy. Speaking of progress, Secretary of Defense and possibly best hair in the cabinet. And by possibly, I mean absolutely.

[Gerald Morgan]

I think. Absolutely. Yeah. I'm a little jealous.

[Steven Crowder]

Pete Hegseth is celebrating Pride Month by renaming a Navy ship that was named after alleged pedophile and blatant homosexual Harvey Milk.

[Pete Hegseth]

And Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the Navy to rename the USNs Harvey Milk. The military vessel was named in honor of the former politician and gay civil rights activist back in 2016 by President Obama. In a statement, a Pentagon spokesman said the renaming under Secretary Hegseth will help highlight the priorities of President Trump. Adding further renamings will be announced following internal reviews. Let's remember who we're talking about here, though. Harvey Milk was a Navy veteran who served in the Korean War, and he was the first honorable dish man elected into public office in California, Right?

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah. All that may be true, but let's be honest, that's not why you're naming the ship after him. There were a lot of Navy veterans who didn't have ships named after them. And you said a less than honorable discharge.

[Josh Firestein]

Yeah, less than honorable. I mean, it's. It's kind of shady because it was about being gay, but.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah. All right.

[Josh Firestein]

But still, less than honorable discharge.

[Gerald Morgan]

It was against the rules then.

[Steven Crowder]

It was against the rules. And by the way, here's something I know the left has already said. Like, you know, did he even think how inconsiderate this was? Mr. Heg. Secretary Hegseth. During Pride Month. And he said, no, no, no, no, no. Listen to me. I did. I know about the timing, and that's why I did it.

[Josh Firestein]

He said it wasn't expedited this.

[Steven Crowder]

He said it was intentional.

[Gerald Morgan]

This is how I celebrate Pride Month, my friends is destroying it.

[Steven Crowder]

That Village People. And he said, yeah, yeah, yeah. I'm renaming this during Pride Month. And you know what I'm thinking for next Year, Black History Month. I may rename the Harriet Tubman. And during Women's History, he may rename Ruth Bader Ginsburg the Cesar Chavez, the Thurgood Marshall. He may rename all of them. And you know what? This matters because history matters. Remember when people were trying to tear the Confederate flags? And by the way, I'm not a Confederate. To be clear, they lost. Okay, great. Hooray, North. The point is, that happened. It started, and then you're tearing down statues of Abraham Lincoln, and then you're naming ships after people who've done nothing of serious note outside of sodomy. So my point is, like, names matter.

[Josh Firestein]

Don't put that on Harriet Tubman.

[Steven Crowder]

They ran an underground train home.

[Gerald Morgan]

The US Innovation.

[Steven Crowder]

She's getting railroaded.

[Josh Firestein]

But I think that if you're gonna change the name of Harriet Tubman, at least make it a submarine.

[Steven Crowder]

Yes, that would make sense. I mean, honestly, let's just do it right on the nose. Or train after her.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah.

[Josh Firestein]

Name a train.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah. And subs, typically are what color.

[Steven Crowder]

You should stop. Wow.

[Josh Firestein]

Typically. They're typically a dark gray.

[Steven Crowder]

That's not true. They're black. Yeah. All right, Maybe.

[Josh Firestein]

Maybe.

[Steven Crowder]

I'm going to launch a torpedo.

[Gerald Morgan]

It's racist to say that subs are black. And she was black. And it fits. Okay, there we go.

[Josh Firestein]

It was.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, a little racist. Yeah. Today, Jerry. Today Gerald's a Pew boat captain.

[Josh Firestein]

Yeah.

[Steven Crowder]

All right, cool. So, of course, predictably, during Pride Month, renaming the ship named after noted alleged pedophile homosexual, talking heads on the left are losing their minds. So anything that reeks of dei, any.

[Unknown]

Appreciation for a marginal community that has.

[Steven Crowder]

Been dissed in American history, that fought.

[Rand Paul]

Hard and more valiantly than Mr. Hecseth.

[Steven Crowder]

Can ever imagine you mispronounced. To achieve status in this country is now fair game for people to knock off. Secretary should spend his time doing things to keep Americans safe. I don't know why we would be spending money or time and his energy to rename Battleships. It just doesn't seem right. The left cares about money now. I don't think that's what the American people want taxpayer dollars spent on. Why is the Defense Secretary just picking and choosing based on trying to make.

[Gerald Morgan]

Statements about specific groups?

[Steven Crowder]

I'm a black person, but I also know who these people are, because why weren't there any conservatives on the list? No, no, hold on a second. Finish that. Because. No, we don't. You're black, Therefore you know what all homosexuals think.

[Josh Firestein]

That's very opposite of the truth.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah.

[Gerald Morgan]

No, they don't.

[Steven Crowder]

It's silly. This is the idea of intersection. What it really means is everyone's allowed except for white straight males. Oh, and by the way, white straight, legal Hispanic immigrants, you're not included anymore either. That's why they're veering further and further. Right? By the way, here are some other headlines from Politico. Navy set to rename Ship honoring Harvey Milk amid DEI purge. But then it gets worse. Newsweek, Harvey Milk, Navy ship to be renamed. Vets call it insult to LGBTQ troops. What? Pretty sure no vet said that.

[Josh Firestein]

Well, maybe they did, but they said it like it's total insult.

[Gerald Morgan]

LGBT people, they were pro the insult.

[Steven Crowder]

I mean, either either you're using the term LGBTQ ironically or you're an asshole. The Advocate wrote for Pride Month, homophobe. Hegseth orders Navy to strip Harvey Milk's name from ship. And the va, by the way, has an entire page dedicated to Harvey Milk. It's don't do what he did. Don't get aids.

[Gerald Morgan]

Aww.

[Steven Crowder]

Here's the thing. You guys wanted to strip George Washington and Abraham Lincoln because they were imperfect, all right? And we always said you can't judge people by today's metrics, right? People throughout history. And if we're gonna do that, Harvey Milk doesn't really come out squeaky clean because he was allegedly a pedophile. Right, in the mid-1960s. Allegedly. And by allegedly, we mean a homosexual in the Bay area in the 1960s. Absolutely. Had a relationship with a 16 year.

[Josh Firestein]

Old boy and he was what, like 19?

[Steven Crowder]

I don't remember how old he was. No, he wasn't.

[Josh Firestein]

I said that on purpose.

[Steven Crowder]

It was pederasty. It was pederasty. He's also the reason behind the God awful Sean Penn movie. Hi, this is Sam. Now, I think that's the wrong one. Yeah, it is the wrong one. We're focusing on Elon because he's very powerful today. We wanted to button down for that one where this one kind of slipped under our radar. By the way, this is not the first ship, just to be clear, named after a pedophile. Let's not forget the only ship known to have decommissioned itself, the notorious USNS Epstein. That one. Yep.

[Gerald Morgan]

It's clear camera footage. Yeah.

[Steven Crowder]

And so I do have a question for you. Since we're now in the era of renaming things and changing history. After whom do you think? The formerly USNS Harvey Milk. After whom should it be renamed? Comment below. I think that's a fair question to ask Billy the Kid. You. You all right over there?

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, I'm, I'm all right. What happened, what happened to your hands?

[Gerald Morgan]

I. I lost a bed.

[Steven Crowder]

I owe a bookie a bunch of money and he. He broke my thumbs. That's awful. How much do you owe him?

[Gerald Morgan]

A couple hundred bucks.

[Steven Crowder]

Billy, you know, if you're having money issues, you could call American Financing. They save people more than that every month.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah, we could also talk about that raising.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, it's like. But it's like 800amonth, I think, right?

[Josh Firestein]

Yeah.

[Steven Crowder]

On average, for mor.

[Josh Firestein]

Sure, they do that.

[Steven Crowder]

I forgot about them. I, I'll call them. Okay, good.

[Gerald Morgan]

Great.

[Steven Crowder]

By the way, so can you just call 1-800-974-6500 or go to American financing.net crowder to save what? People save, on average, $800 a month on your mortgage payments or delay up to two mortgage payments, by the way. NMLS 182334 so 182334 yeah. We have to say that legally, it's.

[Gerald Morgan]

Just part of it.

[Steven Crowder]

Let's go on to this. This is one of those things that is convoluted out there, and I will tell you this. There is gatekeeping where a lot of people try and make this complicated by design. As far as this big, beautiful bill, I am absolutely opposed to increased spending in almost every capacity. Just so you know where I'm, I go back and forth between either a flat income tax or a fair. Like, I don't even know if we should have an income tax. That's how close to libertarian I am economically, fiscally, unbelievably conservative. So I agree in principle with the problems that Rand Paul has to be clear. And I understand the problem with raising the debt ceiling. All right, let's be clear about and I don't like the rhinos out there, but we are going to get into what this big, beautiful bill is, what's in it, what can be done right now. Right. This is not an annual budget bill. It's going through a process of reconciliation. There's a difference between mandatory spending, discretionary spending, what can actually be done right now versus what cannot in a way that is final. And I want to ask this, why is Elon Musk so mad? Huge fan of doge, especially as we saw these cuts coming through. Wasn't thrilled with the level of receipts that we actually found about 30% of the numbers, but couldn't be more on board. But I have to ask, why is Elon Musk, why is he mad? Why is he butting up with Jack Dorsey. And why is he going behind the Trump administration's back to the press, which is an underhanded thing to do? And here's the number that really sticks out to me. Elon Musk is mad saying that this bill has a bunch of pork. That's the reason he's mad. Okay, this bill, all references available link in the description cuts. $1.6 trillion in spending over 10 years. Is it enough? No. Is it a start? Yeah. DOGE all of their proposed cuts. 180 billion. And they've only given us 30% of the receipts for that 180 billion. So 1.9. Sorry. 1.6 trillion over nine or ten years versus DOGE's 180 billion. The cuts proposed here are astronomically more than anything Elon has or could come up with. Why is he mad? Why is he backstabbing the guy who put forward $1.6 trillion in cuts? Can you answer me that? I'll get to it in a little bit. I have my guess with not 30% of receipts. 100% of receipts. Is it on your behalf or is it on Elon Musk's behalf? I think it's fraudulent. I think he's selling you a false bill of goods. I think that you can see that. 180 billion versus 1.6 trillion. It's not even close. Let me get through what this actually is. Okay? This is a reconciliation bill. It's not an appropriations bill like an annual budget bill. Here's what can be included in a reconciliation bill. Provisions specifically related to mandatory spending. That's where you can have cuts to entitlements like Medicaid or snap, namely the fraud or waste or things like the work requirements. Here's what cannot be included in the reconciliation bill, which means it would need to be in some kind of an annual budget bill. Provisions that affect discretionary spending. That would be things like a lot of the Doge cuts. Education, often the military is included there. Here are some exceptions. According to the reconciliation rules, some military and border spending can be classified as mandatory. So this bill has $150 million allocated for the military and for some very specific projects, to be clear. So Elon Musk mad that this doesn't go far enough. Doge can't happen here. Would have to happen in an annual budget bill. And even then, the best he can hope for with what he's provided is $180 billion versus 1.6 trillion over 10 years with this. Let's get past the theater. What's he mad about? Doesn't that matter? And Stephen Miller, who's been knocking it out of the park, summed this up. He said one of the bigger points of confusion on the big beautiful bill is spending versus tax cuts. The lefty CBO says that extending the 2017 tax cuts, meaning preventing their expiration, increases the deficit. Some critics have seen this figure and claimed or implied the bill inked increases, quote, spending. Even according to CBO, the bill cuts spending over $1.6 trillion. So when a libertarian like Rand Paul attacks the deficit impact of the bill, they are attacking the tax cut. Of course, honestly accounted, extending current tax rates has zero deficit impact, which is why the bill, because of its spending cuts, reduces the deficit. You can have an argument about that, but he's making a pretty clear case. A second major point of confusion is what's actually in a reconciliation bill. It is not an appropriations bill or a general budget bill. It provides no funding or authorization for 99/ percent of the operations of government. It has not a single Democrat provision or vote. The bill has three principal sections. Tax cuts, welfare reform, immigration and border security. He says it's a dream bill. Okay. He's right, though, in what he just listed. And we provide all the sources, the references every day. So onto the fight that's taking place and the players involved. And it's this sort of weird alliance of Elon Musk, Rand Paul, Thomas Massie and Jack Dorsey. Yes, that Jack Dorsey, who helped de platform and supported the de platforming of the President of the United States, Donald Trump. That's no small thing.

[Josh Firestein]

It's an odd group. They're just missing a dog in a Mystery Machine.

[Steven Crowder]

What?

[Josh Firestein]

They're like what? They're like the Scooby Doo guys.

[Steven Crowder]

Oh, okay. All right. I was. My brain was.

[Gerald Morgan]

I needed the reference.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, that's a deep cut and I appreciate it.

[Josh Firestein]

Mystery Machine is the man.

[Steven Crowder]

Okay, so yesterday Musk had a. He went on a tear on X he posted. I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, park filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it. You know you did wrong. You know it. So don't tell. By the way, Sam from HR that the bill is. Is full of pork.

[Josh Firestein]

I won't tell him. Just as long as you won't tell him about that breakfast burrito I gave him this morning.

[Steven Crowder]

Oh, no, I lost that. Oh, did you? Yeah. You lost the breakfast burrito? Yeah, I lost the. Here it is. Oh, yeah, I found it. There it is.

[Josh Firestein]

Yeah. Put a Little more in there. Nice.

[Steven Crowder]

Okay.

[Josh Firestein]

Oh, hey, Sam, here.

[Steven Crowder]

Want a burrito? What? Oh, sure. Yeah. Josh, thank you.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah, no problem.

[Steven Crowder]

Mmm. Josh, that's pretty good, man. Little salty and something I can't describe. Really good in this thing. So, Yeah, I won't tell him once you go.

[Josh Firestein]

Yeah, no, he's full of pork.

[Steven Crowder]

So Elon went on on Twitter saying, in November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people. Let me ask you this. Would you feel betrayed if this bill included a massive electric vehicle tax credit? Is that what you voted for? We'll get to that. So he was echoed by people like Rand Paul Thomas Massie and Jack Dorsey. Jack Dorsey saying a Rand Paul Thomas Massie ticket. And just to be clear, this is the same Jack Dorsey. I want to make sure they have this here. Who supported? Who supported. Yeah, it's overlay. E7. The banning of Trump from Twitter in 2021. He said, we made a decision with the best information we had based on threats to physical safety both on and off Twitter. This is a guy who supported the mass deplatforming. So it's interesting that we talk about betrayal, and I don't mean that you have to treat someone as a God King, but if you look at the ulterior motives here, it would seem pretty. What would Musk stand to gain by holding up $1.6 trillion in cuts versus his proposed 180 billion. Well, massive amount of personal wealth and electric vehicle tax credit and Starlink contract.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah, you're right.

[Josh Firestein]

You don't have to back up God King. But Musk and Dorsey kind of on the same team. That's. I mean, one guy exposed the other guy for the Twitter files.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah, pretty much.

[Steven Crowder]

Really?

[Gerald Morgan]

I'm trying to make sense of it, and we'll get to Rand Paul in just a second. Like, I can understand Rand Paul's position. I do not in any way right now understand Elon Musk's position. And. And it goes to the point the numbers obviously don't add up, but also he's saying this is a pork infested bill. I think Rand Paul make the point later on that there's about $300 billion in increased spending over 10 years and that the majority of the debt ceiling increase is going to come from potentially the tax cuts.

[Steven Crowder]

According to the cbo.

[Gerald Morgan]

According to the cbo. Right. So that if this was a spending bill that had a bunch of pork spending in it, I would understand Elon Musk's criticism because we do have a very high debt or debt Got it. And it adds to the deficit. Fine.

[Steven Crowder]

Everybody got it.

[Gerald Morgan]

But I don't see that in this bill. So it makes me go like, what the hell are you really arguing about?

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah. Also it can't trust you. Also it can't be done. Yeah, that's also, at the end of the day, it can't be done. That has to go to an annual budget bill. Elon, do you believe Elon Musk is a stupid person? I don't know. He knows that this. Well, these, these Doge cuts would have to go to the annual budget bill. He knows that. Anyway, going to Rand Paul because I want to spend some time on Elon and Jack Dorsey. Yeah, he was on a warpath yesterday. And again, I probably align most with Rand Paul, probably more with him than any other representative in our government. And even I find him slightly irritating. And he's been on the show like five times. Here he is bashing the bill.

[Rand Paul]

We can still be friends and have a disagreement. But to put things in perspective, the bill increases spending for the military and for border over $300 billion. The Doge cuts, which aren't in this bill, we're about to.

[Steven Crowder]

So one thing, and I get what he's saying there, but remember, we had record number of crossings and apprehensions under Biden, record as far as all of American history. And now record low. Now, could there be some pork in there as far as, like giving bonuses out to ICE agents for simply doing their job? Sure, we can be opposed to that. But the idea that we went through record border crossings and we would spend nothing to shore up our border. Let me ask you, is. Is that what you voted for? I don't think so, but let's continue.

[Rand Paul]

200 billion. So this bill actually increases in the first couple of years spending more than all the Doge cuts combined. I actually accept that cutting taxes can grow revenue. I believe it happened under Reagan. I believe it happened under the first Trump term. And I supported the tax cuts in the first term. I still support him. I support making a permanent. And I do believe they will bring in more revenue than the CBO projects. My objection to the bill isn't about the tax cuts and it isn't about those calculations. My objection to the bill is they're going to raise the debt ceiling more than they ever have, $5 trillion. And that this will be the largest increase in the debt ceiling ever. And if the Republicans all vote for it, the Republicans will own the debt.

[Steven Crowder]

Go ahead, Joe.

[Gerald Morgan]

I don't agree with. So the last part of this Thing is, that is the one that I disagree with the most, that Republicans will own the debt. That is absolute crap. Republicans have voted to raise the debt ceiling before, many, many times. To say that all of a sudden Republicans are going to own this debt for 30 years politically, that, that's just, it's disingenuous. I'm sorry, that is the part of this where I'm like, he is being disingenuous Here on the other side of it, the CBO is saying the tax cuts are the reason for the, I guess the necessity of raising the debt limit. So really hard to be for the tax cuts and against raising the debt ceiling. In the same breath though, throughout his career he has been very consistent. He wants to cut spending. I get it. That's a 60 vote bill that you're going to have to pass. This is a 50, 50 vote bill. So just say, I just don't want to raise the debt ceiling, period. Yeah, whatever that means. Because that could mean the tax cuts go away. Right.

[Steven Crowder]

And by the way, extending tax cuts, this is not implementing new ones.

[Gerald Morgan]

Right. And he was, he was for that, I get. But Stephen Miller makes a great point. You can't. It's all because of the tax cuts, according to the cbo.

[Steven Crowder]

Right.

[Gerald Morgan]

So you have to make a different argument, in my opinion, to be consistent.

[Steven Crowder]

So how do you end up with Elon? In other words? He was on, you know, he gave, I believe, over $200 million of his own fortune to, in one way or another, the President Trump campaign. And now he's not only buddies with Massie or in bed with Massie and Rand Paul, who, by the way, you could be in worse company, but Jack Dorsey. While decrying betrayal, that seems a little bit odd to me. And I think that Massie and Paul are making a principled stand. That's my opinion. I think that Elon stands to gain a lot personally. Here's actually a report from Axios and it's a White House reporter, Mark Caputo, he wrote an article that Elon was butthurt for four reasons. Now, I know this is a report from a White House source, but this person is usually relatively reliable and some of these can be publicly fact checked. So reason number one, this legislation cut electric vehicle tax credits. So there's a termination of this previously owned clean vehicle credit. It was like a $4,000 credit. This bill terminates another clean vehicle credit. It's like $7,500 or a couple. It also terminates qualified commercial clean vehicle credits. And clean, of course, obviously we're talking about electric, we're talking about green. And Tesla lobbied heavily to keep these. So to give you an idea, JP Morgan's Ryan Brinkman gave an estimate that Trump's bill would decrease Tesla's earnings by 52%.

[Gerald Morgan]

Holy crap.

[Steven Crowder]

And keep in mind that Elon Musk, think about it, he's a guy who's created businesses. He didn't invent the electric car. He's done more for electric vehicles than anyone else. And I think Teslas are pretty damn cool. They're good to have to me as a second vehicle if you want to primary vehicle gasoline. But I have no problem with Teslas. But he stepped into businesses that he knew. If you look where he has decided to invest, he knows will result in giant government contracts, subsidies and tax credits. Electric vehicles, space exploration, AI, right? These are the industries he has chosen and every single one of them involves the necessity of government favoritism.

[Gerald Morgan]

Geez, 52% drop in earnings, that's insane.

[Steven Crowder]

Reason number two again, 1.6 trillion cut over 10 years versus his proposed $180 billion. Right doge. Only 30% of which has receipts. Why is he mad? Why is he butting up with Jack Dorsey? Musk wanted the FAA to use Star, but that wasn't allowed because of a conflict of interest. They cited technical reasons, but also potentially a conflict of interest. That would be reason number two. He's met. Trump withdrew the nomination of Jared Isaacman for NASA administrator. When the nomination was withdrawn, Musk publicly wrote on X it is rare to find someone so competent and good hearted. He was upset about it, allegedly. He also wanted to retain his position at the White House, but he was denied. And here's another one that I can't confirm, but might explain the Jack Dorsey connection. Elon Musk is very much supportive of the idea that AI shouldn't have to deal with ip. And that's a big libertarian talking point. There is a push for AI not just to help you with your tasks, but for AI to be able to aggregate, assimilate and then distribute and profit off of all other original content. You write a book, it can now be AI's book. You create a video, it can now be AI. In other words, intellectual property goes away. Which would seem to make sense for a man like Elon Musk, whose company is the only one allowed in China according to the ccp, as a foreign entity. You know who else supports the idea of AI being able to effectively demolish the idea of intellectual property? Well, Jack Dorsey. So it's not just the connection that Dorsey supported banning Trump from Twitter. There are a lot of reasons and it doesn't seem like those reasons would be looking out for the United States of America. Also, you know that Jack Dorsey did a lot of bidding for China, right? You guys know that, right? Remember that during COVID Remember the Taiwan fiasco? Remember what was going on? Remember the who were people being banned? Remember even John Cena had to make a silly apology for releasing gizmo out there in China. That was going on where Jack Dorsey said, well, we're going to follow the rules of these governments. Why? Because they wanted to have an inroad there. So now we see Elon saying that this is a betrayal to the American people. Again, $1.6 trillion in cuts versus all of DOGE. $180 billion, by the way. I'd like both. Yes. I'd like even more. I'd like Doge to find the 1 trillion they promised.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yes, keep going, Doge.

[Steven Crowder]

Which brings us to we may like them, may not like them. Makes a valid point. Steve Bannon went to blame the entire genesis of the bill on Elon.

[Unknown]

The reason if the big beautiful bill's got all these problems and it has some issues. He drove it because he promised a trillion dollars, ladies and gentlemen, $1 trillion. That got him off the hook. It's time for everybody to grow up, run around. Oh, it's show me where it is. The rescission next week is $9 billion. And 2 billion folks is PBS and NPR. Give me a break. Didn't need Doge for that. Been fighting for that one forever. There's $7 billion in there supposedly of, I don't know, fraud on a $7 trillion. He committed to what? Committed to the president, United States. $1 trillion. That's where the Wall Street Journal article the other day said the President said, hey, is this all bs?

[Steven Crowder]

So, okay, that could just be conjecture. Unless Elon did actually suggest on the record that Doge would find at least $1 trillion in savings. Savings at this point exceed $4 billion a day. So it's pretty significant. You think you'll wind up getting to a trillion dollar? I mean, unless we're stopped, we will get to a trillion dollars of savings. The number now 180 billion receipts for 30% of that big beautiful bill will cut 1.6 trillion in mandatory spending over the next decade. So again, on its face, Elon promised a trillion in savings, delivered a fraction of that, and is now saying that it's betrayal for anyone to vote for or support a bill that will cut 1.6 trillion. Elon's promise, 1 trillion delivered at best, 180 billion bill would be 1.6 trillion. That's betrayal. While he goes out and does this publicly and sides with people who were involved with the, the prosecution tarring and feathering of the man who graciously gave him the position at Doge. Donald Trump. Jack Dorsey was happy to see that man go through hell. I guess they really think that he'll have all the power in the universe.

[Gerald Morgan]

Also, even then he could only cut half the debt.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah. Also, by the way, this is the guy who did do well. He did carry out the will of the Brazilian government. Like Elon Musk on a lot of free speeches, he's capitulated as opposed to, you know, I will pat him on the back because he. Chris Pavlovski at Rumble, who said, nope, go screw yourself. Yeah. So he's been wrong on a lot of issues. And hey, hold on a second. If we're talking about cutting spending, how could you push for a, how could you push for these ev. Tax credits? I mean, really, you think the taxpayers want that? Because, hey, if it's a tax credit, I mean, someone else is also on the hook for it. And I understand that other electric vehicles get it and Tesla doesn't because they've been successful. I think it's over 200,000 or over 250,000. How about no tax credits? How about no subsidies for any vehicles? How about Americans buy the vehicles they want? You know, the people who voted for Donald Trump. And here's the thing. Donald Trump did promise this. Do you remember that someone can bring that mission control for later in the show? Remember he said he likes electric vehicles, but we like gas. They're fine, they're fine. But we're gonna have great gas vehicles. And I think that Elon Musk was staged that going, oh, shit.

[Gerald Morgan]

And like I said, I don't really understand his argument here. I just want to clarify something to try to compare apples to apples. We did 10 years on this bill because that's how the CBO is going to score. It is over 10 years. We did 10 years on the Doge. Right. As well. I think there's about 158 billion right now. But if you put it out over a 10 year period, they say it comes out to about, I'm sorry, over a annual period, it's like 15 billion plus a year. So we, you know, we kind of plus it up. So 18, 180 billion. That's kind of a generous number, right? Now, but double it.

[Steven Crowder]

Okay. Triple it. We're still talking about. You're talking about Doge.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah, Doge.

[Steven Crowder]

180 billion. We can annualize. The savings would be apples. 15 billion or so, compared to 1.9 trillion over 10 years.

[Gerald Morgan]

1.6 trillion.

[Steven Crowder]

Sorry, 1.6 trillion.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yes.

[Steven Crowder]

Sixes and nines look the same.

[Gerald Morgan]

They do. That's. I forgot about weird. You said it earlier, weird.

[Steven Crowder]

6 and 9, dyslexia.

[Gerald Morgan]

So that's. My whole point to this, is that Elon Musk is a very smart man. He could make a great argument as to why. Because, you know, there's a lot more characters you can use on X than what you posted. You just said it has a lot of pork in it. Help me understand what you're trying to say. Like, this would be a great time to make the argument for specifically what in the bill you don't like. That's why I can understand Rand Paul's argument, even though I might disagree with it.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah.

[Gerald Morgan]

He says just don't increase the debt ceiling so that we don't have. Have more and more and more endless debt because it's higher. And his real point is the House came in at 4 trillion increase. The Senate said, no, no, no, no, NO. 5 trillion increase in the debt ceiling. So he's even making fun of his colleagues. That's fine. It's a principled stand. I understand it. Elon's. I have no idea what he's trying to say.

[Steven Crowder]

Well, let me. Let me walk.

[Gerald Morgan]

No idea whatsoever.

[Steven Crowder]

Because what happens right now. And by the way, I understand the problems with it. I get the problems with the idea of increased spending, but this is not like the Obama administration. This is not even close. This is not like his omnibus. Remember his package that he brought in? And I think that was done through reconcil in 2009. It was unprecedented. So you can say more of the same. Sure. But there's a lot that's not more of the same. And I'm not going to. We have some people out there who are trying to defend Donald Trump who also don't like the bill and say, like, well, that's actually Congress is in charge. No, Levitt. And Donald Trump said this is his big, beautiful bill, so he owns it. Let's compare that. Let's say you don't support everything in there, but let's go through. Okay. The question being asked is, did you. Is this what you voted for? Let me ask you. Increase in border security and deportations. Is that what you voted for? Okay, maybe not increase in military spending like the golden dome. All right, what about extending the tax cuts which benefits everyone, including middle class families? Do you want that? Okay, so people are saying, what did you vote for? Right. 1.6 trillion cut over 10 years. Okay, what did you vote for when you voted for this administration? Were you thinking of extending massive electric vehicle tax credits? Did you vote for specifically FAA to issue potentially a no bid contract to Starlink? Was that on your top to do list? Were you thinking about who should be the NASA administrator? Which by the way, of course Elon Musk would have a vested interest considering he's also involved in space exploration. So people are saying this isn't what voted for. It's a betrayal. I think it's pretty tough for Elon Musk to make the case that it's a betrayal for any measure of spending cuts, especially when it outpaces Doge, while asking for massive tax credits for electric vehicles to benefit his business. That is predicated, by the way, on new green energy. That's the only reason those tax credits exist. Is that what you voted for? Did you vote for Greta Thunberg? Don't bullshit me. And I know some people I'm not. We've tried to call balls and strikes. Elon's done a lot of good. It's been largely ineffectual as far as Doge, because we don't have the receipts. It's been nowhere near what he promised. But I'm still on board with it. And if the spirit of Doge continues and there are more cuts, great. I would like to see, to be clear here, tax cuts and spending cuts across the board, outside of absolute necessity to me, strong military and being able to secure our borders falls amongst that.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yes, and deport people, that costs a little bit of money as well. But so let's just look at what reality really is right now. You have a bill that's a reconciliation bill that needs 50 votes. Well, 51. Right. But even 50, 50, good old J.D. vance can go in there and break the tie. Yeah, right, right. That's fantastic. We don't have to have any. That's Stephen Miller's point. We don't have any Democrat votes. We don't have any Democrat policies in here. That all goes away the minute you introduce a budget bill. Right, because you need 60 votes, which means you're gonna have to go and give people some stuff. So debt ceiling increase, if you just push that like Rand Paul wants to do right now, if you just push that to a separate bill, 60 votes. What will you have to give up to get the 60 votes? What will you.

[Steven Crowder]

In which case you lose Paul and Massey anyway.

[Gerald Morgan]

You lose Paul and Massey anyway. And so you have to guess what you have to do. You have to give up more to get more Democrats to vote for the bill. This is a very good way of getting this done. Unless of course, you think the debt ceiling is never going to be raised again. Is that really the plan right now, defaulting on the US Debt essentially? I don't really think it is. And that's why I think it's really disingenuous to go out not, not just Paul and all these guys and not make a very clear argument as to why it has to be done your way on this. They're not accounting for the 60 vote thing. They're not accounting for what we'll have to give up for Democrats. What are we going to have to cut?

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah.

[Gerald Morgan]

Do Democrats have any good ideas right now that we're willing to accept so that we can get a debt limit increase? Because they'll bend us over a barrel and just blame us. Be like you're in control of Congress and Senate in the White House.

[Steven Crowder]

Right.

[Gerald Morgan]

And you couldn't pass the debt ceiling increase. You know how this plays out. Why play directly into their hand. Pass this bill and then get the spending cuts you want in another bill because it's not going to happen any other way. You're only going to lose more if you push this out into a separate bill.

[Steven Crowder]

And by the way, why doesn't the balancing the budget, including, why doesn't it include the tax revenue that'll be generated by removing the credits for electric vehicles? Hey, I like it. There you go.

[Gerald Morgan]

Let's do it.

[Steven Crowder]

Right. Right. I don't know. That's just me, Mr. Traditional. But I'm not a. I'm not a huge fan of what I'm seeing out there. And you know what? If you guys, there aren't many. One other thing too. We know this. I know this video won't be seen on X. I'll put it that way. Why? You think it's chance that Ashley Sinclair, his baby mama, was making? Was it 25 to $30,000 a month off of X and people who've done it their entire. Not just me. We're making like 40 bucks. Rumble creators don't get views on X. He's not a free speech guy. But that has nothing to do with it. But I know this won't be seen on X. So if you're watching. Hey. And if you want us to be able to continue to be objective. I like Chris Pavlovski, think he's great. I usually like Elon Musk with some of the things that he's done, but I think the mask has come off a little bit. Consider joining Rumble Premium for a completely ad free experience for not only exclusive content, but all of this goes away. This is why we're able to do this and not have to be beholden to any other outside sources apart from you. $99 a year or $9.99 a month, you get this hand etched mug. If you join annually, all this goes away. And we're very, very grateful to be able to serve you and not have to worry about the fact that this will get four plays on X.

[Gerald Morgan]

That's true. We don't have a debt ceiling increase either.

[Steven Crowder]

So we're good.

[Gerald Morgan]

Really quickly, we do have the clip for you of Donald Trump talking about cutting the tax or the, the EV credits.

[Steven Crowder]

Oh, okay.

[Gerald Morgan]

So if you want to.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, I'm a big fan of electric cars. I'm a fan of Elon.

[Rand Paul]

I like Elon, but, you know, I like them. And I think a lot of people.

[Steven Crowder]

Are going to want to buy electric.

[Rand Paul]

Cars, but if you want to buy.

[Steven Crowder]

A different type of car, you're going to have a. You have to have a choice way. I'm, I'm. Oh, that's probably not the best. Yeah, he said we like gas. Yeah. All right, all right. We're getting out of budget issues. Let's go to pornography. What?

[Josh Firestein]

Finally.

[Gerald Morgan]

Definitely not in the budget.

[Josh Firestein]

It's nothing for me.

[Steven Crowder]

We're talking about. We're talking only something I can relate to.

[Gerald Morgan]

Oh, boy.

[Steven Crowder]

All right. We're talking about gimmickry and we're talking about authenticity and sincerity. Just like I had to say.

[Josh Firestein]

We're done talking about actually Sinclair. Come on. Come on.

[Gerald Morgan]

Cheat crater.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, I get it. And by the way, before anyone throws out, like I said, very imperfect Christian. Right, okay. Very imperfect Christian, before anyone throws out. You ever looked at porn? Of course. I'm a man who was born in 1987 and came into the age of the Internet when there were no pop up blockers. All right, just stop. So that brings us to this question is should people who have engaged in subverting American, perverting American values or traditional values, should they be embraced and given a podium if they declare to be conservatives or Christians? That's the question. And then it comes down to, okay, how do you make that judgment? Are we allowed to make judgments so former onlyfans and, you know, you know, human friction doll, Nala Ray is going to be speaking at TP USA's Young Women's Leadership Summit later this month. Now, look, of course, it's not like Christians forgiveness, of course you want people to come into the fold. I've got it. Okay. And after making millions of dollars in sex work, she turned to Christianity in 2023. Okay, great. Here's the thing. Can someone come in and sit in class? Is it okay to say, yeah? Yeah, you're welcome in the class. Yeah, you're welcome in the church. You can't teach it. You're not welcome on the podium. We're certainly not going to put you in a position of leadership on account of the fact that you made all of your fortune through prostitution. This happened, by the way, with Kanye West. Remember when he came out with his gospel album, we did an entire segment on it and we said, hey, that's great. I hope his conversion is genuine. I think he has some good gospel songs in his album. Probably shouldn't be leading church. And you guys heard his recent banger.

[Josh Firestein]

Now he's hailing Hitler with a group of his church.

[Steven Crowder]

Yes, exactly.

[Gerald Morgan]

We can't say.

[Steven Crowder]

And so now you're looking at, you know, when people talk about, hey, conservative influencers with the young generation. And TPUSA has a very strong college presence and they have a lot of female representatives who are at these colleges. Nala Ray is going to be speaking. So is that a prudent decision? Because some people have had a discussion about this. Again, welcome someone in the fold doesn't make them a teacher. So now we have to say, okay, is this a good idea? And it can only be a good idea if we absolutely believe that this person is sincere. I will ask you this. Let me frame this really, really simply. What bad can possibly come from a new convert? If you're even remotely skeptical, what bad can possibly come from saying, hey, you're welcome, come on in. Submit yourself to the authority of a church. Take some lessons here. Immerse yourself in theology. Be silent and let's see where this goes. What bad can possibly come from that? What good can possibly come from. You were gang banging last week, come here and preach a sermon or teach a course. What bad can come from the first? What good can come from the second? Because I'm telling you, this mistake has been made many, many, many times. So is Nala Ray sincere? Well, we have to go to the tail of the tape and concerning is that she has told you that she specifically lies her ass off just to.

[Nala Ray]

Grow her brand as a viral creator on OnlyFans. Like, when I was on OnlyFans about eight, nine months ago, I went on so many podcasts because I knew the only way to grow my only fans was to be viral. And it's such an oversaturated platform right now, and I've been on it for like, five and a half years. So everything I've said on podcasts is complete clickbait. I did it to go viral, to then make money, and so many people believed it. Like, so for me, I made up this complete character that everyone believed in. And everyone was like, I was very controversial to people, and I was very like, some people really, really liked me. But at the end of the day, social media is just fake. Newslet, you lied about everything. Yeah, pretty much.

[Steven Crowder]

It's cute.

[Josh Firestein]

Funny.

[Steven Crowder]

How do we know. If it stopped there, how do we know she's genuine now? Right? If someone. It's not the same as saying, hey, I was wrong. Someone saying, well, I was just lying. That was. That was how I was gonna build a career. I knew I was lying and I lied. And now I go, well, how do we know you're not lying now? Oh, I'm not. But you just said that you lie. Right? That's very different because you've set it up acknowledging that you lie. And it's especially on issues of spirituality and theology. If you're going to be at a leadership summit for young conservative women, is that fair? And so now we can go to. Okay, does it seem like she is still lying? Because she said that's what she does. Some alarm bells that go off. And again, I hope that her conversion is genuine and she is welcome in the church. Church would have a conversation with her very different from a position of leadership. Here she is. We've already found some pretty significant lies since the conversion. Immediately, here she is telling Rachel Wilson on that whatever podcast that she's never started a ministry.

[Nala Ray]

How does church history make you saved? How does church history make you saved You.

[Steven Crowder]

You quit of and started a ministry.

[Gerald Morgan]

And now you're out here teaching people.

[Nala Ray]

I never started a ministry. I never started a ministry.

[Gerald Morgan]

Then why are you on here correcting people about theology?

[Nala Ray]

What? Your husband. Your husband, who's calling me names. You're mad at me for correcting your husband who's calling me names and saying I'm not a Christian.

[Steven Crowder]

That also he was saying that you shouldn't be defending the prostitution as permissible by saying it's not prostitution. So, okay, I've never showed a ministry. Except she literally sells you courses right now. For 15, the anointed pathway.

[Gerald Morgan]

Oh, boy.

[Josh Firestein]

Is that a ministry or is that a business?

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, for 15 to $50 a month. Gotta keep those monthly subscriptions coming in. Can I just read?

[Josh Firestein]

Oh, nice model.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, read the words.

[Gerald Morgan]

Founded by Nala Ray and Jordan Giordano. This ministry, I mean, did you start it this year?

[Steven Crowder]

So hold on a second, hold on a second. I lied to get ahead. I lied to trick. Cause guys raising the trick. I lied. Yeah, okay. Are you lying now? No, I've never started a ministry on your website. Hey, look at our ministry. You can join it for 15 to $50 a month. TPUSA says lead our young women, sweetheart.

[Gerald Morgan]

Is it. Is it brand new? Because that video is from November. Were you planning to start a ministry?

[Steven Crowder]

She immediately started selling merch. It's like the moment she became a Christian. Profit. Profit off sex. Profit off Christians.

[Josh Firestein]

Yeah, I don't go to church. Does it cost money to join a ministry?

[Gerald Morgan]

Typically, no.

[Steven Crowder]

Not typically.

[Josh Firestein]

I've been to church before and they didn't charge me anything. There wasn't a cover.

[Gerald Morgan]

I mean, you buy books or you can pay for the materials in a class at church.

[Josh Firestein]

Sometimes she's charging a fee for her ministry. That sounds like a cover charge when you go into the church, right? Like they're checking IDs and giving you MDMA.

[Steven Crowder]

Yes.

[Gerald Morgan]

You end up doing porn.

[Steven Crowder]

I want to skip the next clip and go to the ASMR one. So. So, sure. Look, maybe you too spend 15 to $50 a month to join what is labeled a ministry on a website, but they claim is not a ministry. That's kind of your view of Christianity.

[Josh Firestein]

Does she have a pay per view option?

[Steven Crowder]

Well, no, but if not, the good news is we all know that nothing brings folks to Christ like this type of content titled Tingly asmr. Unboxing. You won't believe what's inside.

[Josh Firestein]

Give me a break, vagina.

[Nala Ray]

I have a very special video for you. I've never done an unboxing before, so this is gonna be fun.

[Steven Crowder]

I hate this.

[Nala Ray]

Your story.

[Gerald Morgan]

Has.

[Steven Crowder]

A villain.

[Nala Ray]

The box has lots of fun things to touch.

[Steven Crowder]

I'll bet. Here you go. This is the kind of content you can find. That's how we all handle rolling pins.

[Nala Ray]

Never going to have to buy bread ever again. I've tried many recipes, but this one.

[Rand Paul]

Oh, the city's cold.

[Steven Crowder]

It whispers lies.

[Josh Firestein]

How about the car Flexing lights of the Sylvester?

[Steven Crowder]

No, sir. Actually, that's Very honest.

[Josh Firestein]

Who are those videos made for if. If that's not sexually. If that's not sexual content?

[Steven Crowder]

Well, you see the one where she has a frosting? She goes, yeah, she makes orgasms in that.

[Josh Firestein]

In that video with the rolling pin. She. I watched that one earlier. She has. She stroked it. First of all, that. Who's that for? That's not for women. That's not for straight women.

[Gerald Morgan]

Cinnamon.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah. Yes.

[Josh Firestein]

You're turning on. What are you making? Cinnamon roll. By the way, you guys, you missed the best part. They look like they're. They got jizz on top of them.

[Steven Crowder]

That's the whole thing.

[Josh Firestein]

It's disgusting. And she's making orgasm faces, the whole video, like it's sexually charged. How is that not.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah, I mean, and I want to go back to a point that you made and Jeremy, the quarter. You made this point too, right? We either believe in forgiveness or we don't. I believe in forgiveness 100. And the clip that you played about her lying, if that was the end of it, then it wouldn't matter going forward if she was just sitting in a church somewhere doing her thing and.

[Steven Crowder]

Be like, okay, fine, sure, no problem.

[Gerald Morgan]

But all of this stuff that you're still kind of out there doing and this whole thing that you're branding yourself as a. It's almost like you're the porn Christian right now. Yeah, those things really don't mix.

[Josh Firestein]

Oh, yeah, you're right.

[Gerald Morgan]

You're not able to be the porn Christian.

[Steven Crowder]

This is not the first time.

[Josh Firestein]

And again, well, porn again.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, it's one of those things too, where it's the church. And unfortunately this movement has embraced what they view as celebrity or novelty gimmickry. And so look, it is a part of the Christian faith. You are supposed to gatekeep not from followers, but wolves. Yes, you're supposed to protect against wolves at the door. You can't get outraged over mega pastors and people like Benny Hinn and snake handling and cash stuffed into the walls. And at the same time say, yeah, the person who, who charges 15 to $50 a month for ministry courses in paths to contentment, which by the way, is just another form of carnal pleasure. To be clear, it's using God like your own self help ATM machine. You can't be upset about one and not the other and say, this is a good place to put this person. As far as a position of leadership. No, when you're a new Christian, you're supposed to be in a position of. You're supposed to be a Subordinate it. You're supposed to be submitting to the authority and leadership because you don't be like me getting on a skateboard today, then tomorrow going, Mr. Hawk, let me show you. He'd be like, oh, screw yourself. What are you talking about?

[Josh Firestein]

Be like me giving workout tips.

[Steven Crowder]

Or her giving workout tips. Yeah, or lip filler tips. Now all of this, too, could just be. All right, maybe she's not lying when she said, I don't have a ministry. I've never started a ministry. And then on the website it says ministry. Maybe her husband wrote that and she didn't write that. Maybe her saying that she lies specifically to get ahead, maybe that's just being taken out of context. Well, okay, even if I granted you all of that, she's being put in a position of leadership specifically because people say she could reach these other people who are on OnlyFans. But I don't agree. I don't agree with the premise because I don't believe that someone like that with no foundation in the faith will lead people more effectively than actual pastors who know the word hundred percent. But even then, I don't know if she would be capable considering that. And here's one thing, guys, if nothing else, if nothing else, if you don't agree with any of it and you're taking it as a lying and it's not a ministry, and she should be charging monthly fees. If you agree with nothing else. Can we all agree as Christians? Or even if you're not a Christian, objectively, the denial of the Holy Trinity is apostasy.

[Nala Ray]

Jesus is God's Son. Yeah.

[Steven Crowder]

No, Jesus is God. You're a trinitarian. Jesus is God.

[Nala Ray]

Well, I'm not a trinitarian. I believe in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. But he's called the Son of God because he's the Son of God.

[Steven Crowder]

No, he's called by John God himself. He allowed him himself to be prayed to. Jesus Christ is God.

[Nala Ray]

You can pray to Jesus. Absolutely. But he is God's son.

[Steven Crowder]

No, he is God, the Trinity.

[Nala Ray]

Then why does the Bible specifically say that God is in heaven, on the throne, and Jesus says at his right hand there are two, but they are also one.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, listen, there is. There is one God Bible.

[Nala Ray]

Are you reading, like, for me, it's like communion means something different for everyone. But communion means relationship. You are communing with the whole Holy Spirit. You are being in one. You are literally becoming like one with them.

[Steven Crowder]

Can you bring back up her course, guys? What it's called there, the. The collage F1.

[Josh Firestein]

Is it from knees to knees? Still on my knees.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, I think it is. Collage F1. Can you guys bring that up really fast? The Anointed Pathway. Pathway. The Anointed Pathway. And it's all about finding your purpose and breaking free from. From baggage. She said that it means different things to everyone. Talking about communion. She said it about Christianity as well. Well, if. It means if, okay, as a Christian, I'm a Christian. If Jesus Christ said, I am the way, the truth and the light, there is no way to the Father except through me. Meaning not all religions are equal. There's only one path to the Father, only one path to heaven. Hell is real. It sucks. And if you don't take the one path, that's where you're headed. For someone to say, well, that could mean a lot of things to a lot of different people, doesn't it then mean nothing at all? How do you teach? And my question is, why is she leading anybody? Of course you can forgive someone. Of course you can welcome someone. Hey, welcome to the classroom. You can't teach. Welcome to the church. You can't get on the podium. Hey, welcome. As a guest on this show, you're not the host. Why does it hard concept to understand? And again, I'm going to ask you, what harm could possibly come from telling someone like this, a new convert who at best has no understanding of the faith, at worst is subverting it to sell a course that could also very likely be apostasy. What harm could possibly come from the approach of great welcome. Be quiet, listen, learn and submit yourself to the authority of people here who've been doing this for a very long time. And we hope that you're with us for years to come. What harm could possibly come from that? What net good can possibly come from giving someone who has made all of their fortune off of sex work, told you that she will lie to you and is now selling you new courses? What good can possibly come from giving her a podium to lead other people because they can definitely be led astray? Sincerity, authenticity. That's a currency that is in short supply today. And we're going to take your chats on this on Elon Musk, on Nala Ray, on what's going on, because it seems like there is a groundswell where people are getting a little bit tired of being fleeced and taken advantage of. Of. Don't be a mark. Let's continue right now with the chat. It's a love letter to Rumble Premium Mug Club.