← Louder with Crowder
Louder with Crowder
How USAID Spread Fake News with Your Tax Dollars & Trump Took Down Title IX
00:53:19
Loading summary
Transcript1 lines
- [00:06]
Steven Crowder
Grab the penis from my hand why do people say that I am demented? We're science Never the plan to face this end often tragic and we're making weird science Things you've never seen before not behind closed doors they're two kids across the nation we're science all cause teacher told me to they just want your kids making tissue plastic flesh we're science Everyone knows you're a man no one buys a scam no one buys a scam My fetishization is your dream A master detection my creation Fetishization we're science Gender ideology separate blue hair pure insanity we're making weird science clearly mentally unfit Grooming from the TikTok something doesn't fit will make you nervous Science Ooh, pictures from a horror film Endless blowdown shots Tons of days and them's just making up science with kid sanity birthing people and people who menstruate my delusion Is it real? It's my creation I do not know the actualization it's all for sure when does it stop? I do not know I do not know it is from my hand why do people say that I am demented? Click Rumble Premium and join now for 99 annually or 9.99amonth to get the entirely ad free experience and exclusive content from Lauder with Crowder, Nick DePaulo, Mr. Guns and Gear, Donald Trump Jr. And an ever expanding roster of content creators and free speec. That's what I know. Do what you're doing. I'm just. I'm tired. Yeah. From all the winning. I can't. I can't. I can't have another bite of winning. Maybe we can wrap up some winning and save it for later. I'm kidding. You never get tired of winning. A doggy bag of winning. We've had so much winning. I have gout now. Could be the capers as well. I think maybe and liver. Let's just fill you on the rundown here. Today, Donald Trump, President Trump, is he detransitioned Title ix? Okay, we'll get into that executive order. Rightfully so. You know, yesterday we covered what was happening with usaid. Usaid, however you want to pronounce it, the propaganda funding. There's some misinformation out there. We want to make sure that we're clear about that because the truth is more effective than the lie. And there's misinformation on both the left and the right. But we're also seeing more propaganda funding than we initially thought. And now we're wondering if we need to look into late night comedy propaganda because we have a supercut for you where jokes, premises, sources, references are verbatim the same across four late night programs. Hmm. And you know what? It's very effective for a period of time in this country. More people got their news from Jon Stewart. Remember, early on there was a big study and everyone was pretty alarmed about that back in the day than they did from real news. And here we are today. So look, let me ask you this. What source of news do you trust the most out there? I would say this, you shouldn't trust anybody. But if they don't provide you with their references right away, you should start asking questions. And we're gonna provide a lot of references today discussing title in Chicks with Dicks. So I know you have to hit that. So probably already you have seen if you're watching on YouTube, this. Head on over to Rumble. It's a live show weekdays, 10am Eastern, including Friday. If you're a rumble premium. Captain Morgan, CEO, hope you're well. Josh Firestein will be Spokane Comedy club bound tomorrow. This Saturday. Yeah. Best comedy club. Well, one of them in the country. They have a bathroom in the green room now. Yes, it's very nice. I'm inviting people in. Yes, I'm a big fan. We could share a plate of spaghetti. A man tried to have an entire conversation pitching a dog toy while I was relieving myself. Was it indestructible? It was indestructible. Oh, boy. By that I mean it lasted four seconds. I think he thought I had one in with me now. Oh, okay. We're going to get to more of this later. Miniature USAID funding and late night. But just in case you were wondering, hey, here's the scope of government. What is the legitimate role of government? This is a conversation that we have. And I understand that there is some wiggle room. I don't know that the case can be made, however, that any funding should go over to the New York Times, though it has. And if you want to know how they received or what they did with the $371,000 in your tax paying hard earned money, well, it's spent on stuff like this. Your challenge today is to find an ultra processed food that you enjoy, like a bag of Cheetos, compare it with its whole food equivalent, and really pay attention to what the sensory experience of ingesting that food is like. So we're going smell the Cheeto. Okay. Do you have any words for what you're sensing right now? There's sort of a corn chip scent. I also get kind of like a fryer oil flavor and then a very. The fat lady pretending like she's never had cheetos before. You're 7% cheeto. Cheetos does have Cheddar cheese on the ingredients list. Step two is taste. So I think we should start with the Cheeto. Bet you wish it was almost legal. Like, if I was home alone, I would do a Cheeto shot. I mean, it's not really designed. Sweetheart, you are always home alone. No, I'm not kidding cheese though, are you? I'm getting cheese, but kind of in the most basic outlines. So it's like there's the saltiness, there's the kind of savory umami, and then I'm getting that. But enough about your snatches. Okay, so it is like, not very complicated. Sound like this when I taste wine. The sense of the flavor. We're having to eat, like a lot of these. Right? Then when you go back, you eat all of them. Yes. You are clearly eating a lot of cheese. Yes. Salty cheese. Like a yell of cheese. Yeah, it's like, it's like it's shouting cheese at you, but, like, very briefly. No, that's when you lift your arm. Her hand was stained with Cheetos. Yes, it was like, permanently. I need more to taste it. Our journalism is stained with the blood of Cheetos. How many angry lesbians, closeted lesbians, can you fit in a room? And how much does it cost? Well, it turns out about $371,000. Here's the real fact sheet. You could have just gave him Cheetos. Yeah, you could have just. You could have just thrown the Cheetos on the floor. Like, here, here. Leave it down. Ate it. They initially were just going to give them cheese and then no one applied. Okay, we'll also give you Cheetos. Yeah. Well, that one definitely did reply, but they couldn't find a. They couldn't find a foil. They had to scissor it. You know, like, we know that you're going to reply with anything food related, but we need to include other team members. So this is the New York Times, right? The most legitimate publication. All the news that's fit to print. Of course, 371,000 didn't go just to that. But if it's a penny of the $371,000 in federal funding, it's a penny. Too much comment below if you think we're so beyond. We thought the problem at one point was NPR in pbs it's almost all of media. The story's just getting worse and worse. It's Pravda with dykes. You can save one Cheeto. I know that. The YouTube doesn't. Yeah, well, don't. Not if it's near her. No, that's true. For crying out loud. Close. It's the Cheeto Flores consent policy. She's separating them from their family. All right, that's a deep cut. Now, it was yesterday, and this is what we're getting to Title nine. And this is one of those situations that in the future, historians will look back and say what? Because no one will understand why this was necessary. So yesterday, on National Girls and Women's Sports Day, President Trump signed the titled Keeping Men out of Women's Executive order. Under the Trump administration, we will defend the proud tradition of female athletes, and we will not allow men to beat up, injure and cheat our women and our girls. From now on, women's sports will be only for women. Good. I want to make this a really good signature because this is, you know, this is a big one, right? What a misogynist. Yes. Watch this, watch this. Oh, I think we have a 10. We have a 10. God bless you, mister. And not one of those little girls was sniffed or fondled. Hey, new day. Baby steps in the White House. So I've an executive order, by the way, that we never thought we'd ever actually. We never thought we'd ever. Yeah, seriously. What? I mean, historians will look back and go, yeah, this executive order. And the student will say, wait, what was that? Keeping men out of. There had to be an executive order to keep men out of women's sports. And this was signed on International Women's Sports Day. That happened. This isn't. You're not pulling my leg. Yeah. There was a period of about five to eight years where there were 57 genders, and then we went back to two. So that's better. I've been talking about this for quite a while, and yeah, Title IX has all kinds of problems, but let me fill you in on what initially was meant to be how the left has eroded women's rights and what we're seeing now because this is a fundamental shift and this is what the left sees as a violation of human rights. I don't think they have a grasp at all on what human rights are. So Title IX was designed to prevent sex based discrimination in education and specifically activities that would be receiving federal funding. So areas like athletics, recruitment, admissions, and there was kind of a broad umbrella which we'll get to got broadened as it related to sexual harassment. It was for women. It was designed for women. You can look at rbg, watch that documentary. It was very important to the women's movement. And then it became about intersectionality and obfuscation was always the goal of the left on this, which is why right now, they're freaking out. Trump just signed another executive order attacking trans people of all ages in sports. The bans aren't about transgender participation. This isn't about saving women's sports or protecting girls and women in sports. This is part of a whole, literally, about protecting women in sports. Essentially erase transgender Americans from American life. The executive order titled Keeping Men out of Women's Sports deliberately misgenders trans women through the language the new President of the United States articulate. Complete, utter nonsense and doing complete harm to the most vulnerable communities in his own society. Can I just. Let's just take this quite literally, okay? As though we are a logically sound six year old. How does that harm a single woman? Not allowing biological males in women's sports. Can anyone give me the next. I've done, I don't know, half a dozen. Changed my minds on this. We don't have to face the adversity of losing. Yes. I've not gotten one legitimate case. Not one. Not one legitimate argument that even approaches something that resembles convincing. This is about erasing transgender people. No. They can compete in men's sports, can't they? They can compete in any sports. They can compete in any sports with their biological sex. Go for it. How are we erasing? Genuine question to you. What does that mean, erasing them? We're revoking their citizenship. We're deporting them for being trans. They're not allowed to be in public spaces, period. They're not allowed to exist. We're simply talking. It's very comparable to weight classes and entirely as appropriate. So one person who is not having any of this as it relates to the games, and this is where it came to a crescendo yesterday, was none other than Nancy Mace. The gentle lady has used a phrase that is considered a slur in the LGBTQ community and the transgender community. Let me please finish without interruption. And tranny, tranny, tranny. I don't really care. You want penises in women's bathrooms, and I'm not going to have it. Okay? No, thank you. Now, whether you agree with her method or not, I think. I think she got the point across. Well, she's got to be more careful. You know, you say it three times and one might appear. Well, no, come on. That's. That's. I. That's an urban legend. That's. Watch. Tranny. Tranny. Trenny. See, it's kind of the rule, but. I mean, you make a good point, but. Oh, God. What? What? Oh. Oh. Oh. Candy. Tren. Get out of here. Candy. Can I have my bees back? No. Get, don't get. We never loved you anyway. God, I had a hot flash. Sorry I didn't lock the door. Yeah, Jeez. Or the mirrors. I think you'll second guess that one. So, title nine, what it was designed to be. Obama, Biden, where we are now brings us to this week's installment of Then and Now. I got a blood blister in my hand from squeezing that fire extinguisher. Did you really? Yeah. Squeeze it really, really hard. Alright. Really? It was scary. It was quite scary. It's the adrenaline. I didn't feel it because of the adrenaline dump. But now you're good. All right. You gonna be okay? I think I'm gonna be fine. So we gave you the basis of Title ix. Let's go back to then, some alterations that were made with Title IX. Barack Obama, 2011, this administration, Barack Obama's lowered the standard of evidence to find students liable for sexual assault. That was a big change. We lived through it. Mattress Girl was an example of that. She was never actually raped. There were a bunch of rape hoaxes that had taken place and men's lives irreparably destroyed. In 2016 it changed. It was modified to require schools to treat trans students consistent now with gender identity. So that means bathrooms, that means housing. That included sports. So it no longer had anything to do with sex, which was the basis of title. Now it's gender identity, which was pretty much made up within two years of that taking place. That brings us to another then, then again, the Biden administration, they reinstated the trans protections which were rescinded in Donald Trump's first term. They expanded harassment to include misgendering. What? So we went from harassment to mean something? It meant, hey, deliberately using your words or approaching someone in a way to make them feel uncomfortable, to make them feel accosted to saying something that a woman doesn't like to then saying something that somebody who claims to be a woman, even if they have cock and balls, doesn't like. You see the slippery slope? It's not a fallacy. In this case, they also implemented what was known as the single investigator model, which means that the same person would investigate sexual harassment or discrimination claim, which Includes misgendering someone. And the same person acts as a decision maker in determining violations and recommending sanctions. Imagine you get the wrong one. I imagine they're all the wrong one. Yes. I imagine there's someone putting them into positions that has an agenda. Exactly. Imagine you say, sir, I mean, ma'am, Boom. One person decides that is sexual harassment. And we have cases of this and you're out. You don't get to graduate. That brings us to now, which is why this executive order is appropriate. So this is something. And of course, but Donald Trump's executive order has implemented a two genders policy. That is the definition. Okay. That is where we are going. That is how we are moving forward. It empowers the Secretary of State to see that these international sports bodies, not just us here, enshrines these protections along with our sports, anyone competing. So this would include the International Olympic Committee. Mitt Romney just soiled his pants. And it rescinds. It rescinds any federal funding. Well, he speaks French. The ioc, and he's like, oh, there's a. Par francais. Yes, Olympic. And this EO rescinds any funding to institutions that don't comply with it. Good. The fact that we have had to go through this saga is scary. It does defy logic. But I will tell you this. The fact that we have gone through it, I think probably strengthens the idea that this pendulum has swung the other way. I think enough people have seen this and said, yeah, okay, we actually probably need some protections for biological women. People are far less concerned with hurting feelings than they are now with actually hurting women. So we're gonna keep men out of women's sports. And some men, I guess, trannies in women's sports. Oh, bye. So take your testicles and dead names like Kyle. It's not a question. There's a bulge between your thighs. Gum. Blatally predictable to anyone with eyes. Trump's getting things set right with title nine. Well done. By the way. Download the Rumble app if you're watching right now, that's the best way to stay in touch. You only get notifications when your subscriptions are live. It's Rumble. We own Live. And of course, Rumble Premium is what keeps everything going. Let's go. And it's not funded by usaid. No. Which brings us. You know what? I want to clarify something here, too, because we try and be transparent here. First off, the dominoes, they just keep falling. It's a story that keeps growing and growing. And I think we're going to look back on this As a watershed moment where people said, wow, that's how corrupt our government was. We knew there was waste. We knew there was half a trillion dollars a year in fraud. We didn't realize that the spending was so frivolous or in some cases, actually subversive. Yeah. Now, I want to be clear about this. There have been some stories out there that are not necessarily accurate. And that's given the left ammo to fact check and miss the principle of the story. And the truth is, yes, a lot of different entities, news agencies, have been receiving taxpayer funds in a way that is completely inappropriate, I would argue violates the First Amendment. And I want you to know that we did cover it live. There's a difference in things that we cover live as they are breaking. Right. Because we feel the need to let you know what is. What is at that point in time being reported versus stories, segments like this, where we make all the sources available and are meticulous about our research. Yesterday, this was breaking as we were on air. The Politico, USAID funding, apparently this came out about Politico. Politico, I think, received $8.1 million government funding. And also of note, apparently Politico just missed payroll. Really? Yes, apparently due to a technical glitch. They said to their employees, they're like, hey, sorry about that. All right, so that was us live yesterday as it was breaking. The technical glitch is not in dispute, I believe. No, that is not in dispute. The missing of payroll thing. So we have to clarify this a little bit. So here's what you are seeing out there. That Politico got $8 million from USAID in 2024. Right here we can bring this up. It says Politico is owned by Axel Springer, which in turn owns Business Insider, which publishes the tech journalism, whose targets have included Elon Musk. So the $8.1 million that Politico received last year from USAID has been used to support the owner of Business Insider and its efforts. That is not accurate. There is a number that is $8 million and it is taxpayer dollars, and it is going to Politico. But it is not all from usaid. The reason I say that that is important is because the left is fact checking it, saying, not true, it's just a couple hundred thousand dollars. And the left reads it and moves on. It is 8 million. That's not accurate reporting. The 8 million is a total number that Politico received from all government agencies. That's worse. That means that more government agencies were giving Politico Money for their hackery, about $24,000 came directly from USAID. You can check all of the references link in the description so that you know all of this checks out. It is still 8 million. But the left will fact check that number is coming from USAID as false. Technically is true. I would argue it's worse because this is a clear example of collusion where all arms and departments of government are working together to fund propaganda. And someone who answered perfectly on this specifically how this was actually subsidizing subscriptions. Caroline Levitt, who's probably the biggest job upgrade that I think I've seen in my lifetime. I was made aware of the funding from USAID to media outlets including Politico who I know has a seat in this room. And I can confirm that the more than 8 million taxpayer dollars that have gone to essentially subsidizing subscriptions to Politico on the American taxpayers dime will no longer be happening. The DOGE team is working on canceling those payments now. Again this is a whole of government effort to ensure that we are going line by line when it comes to the federal of government's books. And this President and his team are making decisions across the board on do these receipts serve the interests of the American people. Is this a good use of the American taxpayers money? If it is not, that funding will no longer be sent abroad and American taxpayers will see significant, significant savings because of that effort. Beautiful. Perfectly done. Taxpayer dollars subsidizing subscriptions. She wasn't caught flat footed. She errs in the side of caution, being very articulate, being very accurate with her words. I expect good things. Yeah, absolutely. And by the way they were saying these are pro subscriptions from politico that were maybe 10,000 ish. I saw some reporting on this. Just go to X. Yeah, you're gonna find the information more quickly on the number one news app like it just is people telling you what's going on in the world. And even then it doesn't cost millions of dollars. For example, we have subscriptions to certain newswires or we have subscriptions, for example to certain royalty free images or tracks. It does not cost millions of dollars. This is a money laundering scheme. This is a media company that makes sense. It doesn't make sense for the USAID to have it or you know, an FBI or a CIA agency to have political. Get it on your own money. Yeah, exactly. Well and even just subsidizing any form of media I would argue is a violation of the first amendment. Okay, let me explain to you why? There's a freedom of the press. Right people. There's a lot. First Amendment. And the left will throw out things like separation of church and state. Well, that's not in the First Amendment. I understand what you're discussing. You are also misinterpreting the spirit. The First Amendment does talk about the freedom of the press. That means that the government needs to be free from the press as well. They have no say in the press. The press cannot be free if they are bound to the government because it is the press's duty to report on the government. You know, their job was to do what Doge is doing now. Do you understand that? That's the only role of the press they're supposed to be. The reason the First Amendment is in there is for the same reason we have the three branches of government to be a check and a balance against a government, a free press. Otherwise, it's Pravda with lesbian bloggers. Nobody wants that. Except for lesbian bloggers. I don't want it. Not when you see them eating Cheetos. So this is how the left is spinning it. Here's Erica Pandey and Sarah Fisher at Axios. They wrote the government spends trillions of taxpayer funds annually. Okay. The fact that the Trump administration is focused on slashing relatively small media budgets at the outset of Trump's second term speaks to how seriously targeting media companies is their priority. Hold on a second. Eight million here, A few million there. A couple million here. Hundred thousand here. One hundred thousand there. One hundred thousand a year. Another hundred million here. Guess it adds up. And at a certain point, we find ourselves at the intersect of 220 to half a trillion dollars a year in fraud, not to mention waste. Where do we start? We know it's not the Department of Education. Got to add more money there. We know it's not entitlement programs. Got to throw more money at that. Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security. No, Absolutely not. Hey, all right, where. How about we start with. Because we don't know the level of fraud to be clear, how about we start with the most illegitimate, unconstitutional forms of government action, like subsidizing media? I don't care if it's $2 or if it's $2 billion. Bet my life it's at least 2 billion. Overall, it should be no dollars. There's no discussion to be had here that it is the government's role to be funding media. Especially when you understand that that media then in many cases comes out and endorses candidates who promise larger government hey, let me ask you this. How do you think you garner more positive coverage from Politico, Reuters, npr, New York Times? Do you think promising bigger budgets might help? And they're right about one thing, though. The government has been spending money on media for a long time. This is not new media. Propaganda has been going on here for years. Extra. Extra. Read all about it. Pregnant trans men feel alone and mistreated by America's healthcare system. Extra. That's cause they're the wrong gender. Hey, if you're one of those, take a paper, read about it. Also go to Crowdershot.com, get you a nice shirt, give you a nice little hog there, nice and tight. Extra, Extra. Read all about it. Transgenders. Might I suggest a waste paper mask? That's the place for you. Extra. Extra. Read all about it. You freaks. See, they're talking to you. Don't look at him. Kim. Kurt. All right, so let's just go through some of the entities. At what point are they. Are they actually private businesses? Let's just call them government entities. There you go. Government news agencies. You can't survive without the government's money. Bye. Government content creation, whatever you want to call it. Let's go with Politico. All right, we'll start with politico. So from USAID, they received about $24,000, but the total, and this is just 2024 in taxpayer dollars granted to them from the government is $8.4 million. Well, actually, it may be a little worse than that. What's that? So it looks like there's about $32 million in funding. So. And it's supposed to be kind of over the lifetime, but lifetime looks like it starts in 2016 with very small numbers. And then those lines go up quite a bit with a new administration for some reason. Then they go back down with this. Oh, and by the way, there was no 32 million. They didn't have Doge. I guarantee you President Trump back then didn't realize a level of corruption. That's why you're seeing a man on a mission now. Yes, or he was seeing it. No one was believing. No one was. Nobody was helping him because he didn't have his own people with him. And by the way, that's from all government agents. So that's all. Yeah, all governments destroyed. Just. I don't care. Numbers. I don't care if they're getting. If they're funneling money from the VA or they're taking it from your Social Security check. Some slush fund doesn't matter. It's my money and I want it now. Okay, no annuities. When you have huge fraud and you need cash now called d o g e877 no cash. Let me show Politico though what they have done too. So you have actually funded these stories. And I know the Hunter Biden laptop was deemed Russian disinformation. Okay, so that's bad. But does it? It now really makes sense when you look as to how vigorously these agencies, these government arms of propaganda, these news publications fought against the idea of a free press. Now it makes sense. Let's look at some of those political headlines while they were receiving your money. Trump is pushing falsehoods. Some Republicans are worried about the fallout. 2024 may be the year online disinformation finally gets the better of us. Oh yeah, we have to be concerned about the non government funded disinformation. Starting to get the Orwellian picture. Let's go to ap, Associated Press. They're considered very legitimate. A lot of people in this industry use their newswire. 2024 government dollars. We don't know how much came from USAID right now. The total though in taxpayer dollars, 1.7 million. So some of those dollars come from the State Department, dod, it is hard to track. This is just what we know now. And by the way, I'm willing to bet that they are burning, physically burning hard drives now. Again, it makes sense when you see, hey ap, were they fighting for a free press? Were they fighting for independent journalists? Or were they part of the cabal silencing us, you, the American people, while stealing from you? Think about that. They stole your money to silence you. Some AP headlines during this time. While government funded anonymous users are dominating right wing discussions online, they also spread false information and of course that leads to always demanding they be removed. RNC's live streaming partner Rumble for the GOP debate is a haven for disinformation and extremism. So think about this for a second. These sites, these publications are used for YouTube fact checking. People get throttled, people get demonetized. Popular people, people you choose to watch, they go to an alternative. Remember people used to libertarians, go build your own YouTube. Okay, very expensive multi billion dollar endeavor Rumble. The people funded by the government say gotta ban that too. It's not enough for you to go build your own sandbox, they have to bomb everyone else's sandbox. And the bombs are funded by your tax dollars. BBC. And I know what you're thinking, BBC, Careful BBC. Of course it's funded by the government. Yeah, yeah, yeah, but I bet you didn't realize our government. Are you taking the fucking piss? I'm not. 2024 money. Total dollars. 2.1 million. In that case, it looks like all 2.1 million came from US aid, the BBC, the British Broadcasting Corporation. Why in the hell are they taking money from the United States? And why are we funding them? We're better than the Brits. That's why we left. Left. Let's look at the headline. BBC fighting for Free and Open Internet. BBC fighting for Independent Journalists. Here are some headlines. Disinformation Poses biggest risk in the US social media. Is it really biased against US Republicans? YouTube bans malicious insults and Veiled threats. That was an article, by the way, about us. What? Malicious insults and veiled threats. We actually didn't make those. And we didn't violate them. No. And they weren't veiled either. No. And this is what's so perverse about this. You cannot have a free press. If everyone. Let me ask you this, okay? You've seen every Disney movie, you've seen every children's movie where oil man bad, right? Business person bad. And we all accept the premise that there's a big bad oil man who's funding some kind of an organization. And so what do they do? Well, they push propaganda for big oil. We used to hear that about Big Pharma. Until the left became their biggest fans, right? They're lying. Look, big business is lying to you. Why? Someone. Someone holds the purse strings. Guess what? You have to dance, monkey dance. Does that not apply to government? If the government is funding you, if the government is what allows you to exist, would you imagine that that entity is beholden to government? Would you imagine that they have a vested interest in larger government? Do you think that BBC, Politico, ap, do you think they're ever going to allow legitimate articles to go out advocating for less government, or advocating for downsizing government, or advocating for rooting out fraud in government? If you even started an op ed, the boss at AP or BBC would walk down to your office, what are you doing? Or looking into this stuff? One of the tweets that I saw, that's the biggest cell phone that I've seen so far, is that, guys, all this information you're seeing has been public. It was available in 2020 and 2022 and 2024. And I'm saying all this information has been public, and it took Elon Musk coming in to start exposing it. What were you doing? Your job is to do stuff like this. That's right. You were on the take, it looks like. Yes. That's why he didn't cover this. Yeah. And by the way, this is also proof positive. When people say private business can do whatever they want. Really, is YouTube a private business? At that point, if these are the fact checkers, if these are the borderline content advocates, they don't tell you who it is. But we know at least ap, we know that at least Politico, we know that at least WaPo have been included. We know that at least the Southern Poverty Law Center. Hold on a second. People have said it's not. It's not free, it's not freedom of speech. You have the right to say whatever you want. Not on a private platform. Okay, okay. What if it's being supported by taxpayer dollars? It couldn't be more clear. It's no longer the digital town square. It's the digital capital steps. And they're removing you for speaking. Let me give you another example here. You may not remember this, but remember Biden's dhs, they published. Here's some connections. We didn't fully have a Cybersecurity Infrastructure Security Agency report. You know, CISA is how people pronounce it. Okay. It listed this very show as the top spreader of misinformation. Well, hold on a top. We didn't quite get to number one. I think it was a different day where they had like a little graph. Okay. This very show. The only show that provides all the references publicly. Yeah, usually left leaning. Like right now you just saw size. Right now you just saw New York Times. They listed this show. They used taxpayer dollars to contract private companies to generate that report. And that report was used by social media platforms, including places like YouTube, like Twitter, like Facebook, to decide who to censor, who to shadow ban, who to throttle, who to demonetize taxpayer dollars, generate a false report that this is misinformation, and that goes to big tech. And they say, aye, aye, Captain. We're just following orders. That seem like a free press to you? That's why we need to know every single penny that has been spent. Because otherwise, there's no fixing the issue. Yeah, and we'll be contacting our lawyers. I think we'll be contacting the half Asian just to do some checking. Half Asian? Kraken. I'd like to know how many YouTube Premium subscriptions are being paid for by US tax dollars. That's it. That's a legitimate question. I mean, seriously, if they're subsidizing subscriptions to Politico and the New York Times and AP, then surely they're subsidizing subscriptions to YouTube, premium CNN and they show CBS News and all that. Or advertising YouTube TV. Imagine if we had $8 million a year to spend just in advertising Google and YouTube. Yeah, that would be a top result. Game changer. Not to mention, you know, we also talked about what this does with Brazil. We talked about that coup there. When you're talking about USAID and you're talking about the Supreme Court. And just to mention this, by the way, Paulo Figueiredo, I know he's going through some stuff. A friend of ours. And a friend of ours too, also Brazilian, they sent me like God, so much meat, Easy Meats. They're not a sponsor, but I've never had better, better steak in my life. They ship it to you, it's frozen. It's just easymeats.com like their wagyu. It's not even the same food as most steak that I've had. These are two Brazilian guys who are in the United States, God fearing, patriotic Americans. And no, I'm keeping it for me. There's an egg shortage. If there's a steak shortage. Come on, I'll cook it for you. Okay, well, that we made. Maybe come on over for you. But do, if you're in Florida, go check them out or you can order their stuff. It's just again, they're not an official sponsor, just friends. And they did me a solid. Let's move on to this because this is something I would like to see examined. Okay, so we know about Politico, we know about BBC, I would imagine Reuters, other places we'll look into. I listen to these late night monologues every day. Kimmel, Colbert, sometimes Seth Meyers, Jon Stewart, when he shows up twice a week right now, self torture. Yeah, yeah. And I've noticed disturbing, disturbing trend. I get it that you run into the same concepts, but I'm willing to bet that if there isn't some kind of direct funding going on, and I do hope that Doge looks into it, that there are meetings that take place because you can run into similar ideas. But you're about to see a supercut here, a montage. It's impossible unless this is a coordinated effort to make the same exact jokes about the same exact story using the same exact source and often time codes and add on top of that, then use the same exact lies. Lies by omission. And display the same exact biases in not telling people certain portions of the story. So this is easy to just write this off as a story about copying jokes, but when you understand that this may be done for political expediency, boy, that makes it pretty scary when you understand what the role of a court jester is actually supposed to be. So let's. I think we have this montage right here from late night shows. Some verbatim jokes to start off with. And not just verbatim jokes, but watch the RFK Jr. This story went on all day, full day of hearings. And both of them picked the exact same clip from the exact same source of some relative of RFK who said something crazy that could not be less relevant to lead into the same exact joke. Proof. Ambassador Kennedy gave an alarming example of Bobby's insane cruelty from his drug fueled college days. His basement, his garage, his dorm room were always the center of the action where drugs were available. And he enjoyed showing off how he put baby chickens and mice in a blender to feed to his hawks. Okay, okay. That behavior is disgusting and cruel and it completely disqualifies him from working for HHS and for Jamba Juice. His first cousin, Caroline Kennedy, daughter of jfk, made a video opposing his confirmation and adding to the long list of crazy stories about this crazy person. His basement, his garage, his dorm room were always the center of the action where drugs were available. And he enjoyed showing off how he put baby chickens and mice in a blender to feed to his hawks. Well, that explains why he lost the job at Jamba Juice. So now we have a one month ceasefire in what some liberal rag called the Wall Street Journal, described as the dumbest trade war in history, to which the Dallas Mavericks said, hold my. Luka Doncic, this. Thank you. Thank you very much. You know, on Friday, the Wall Street Journal ran an editorial saying that Trump's tariffs would cause the, quote, dumbest trade war in history. Of course, that was published before Dallas sent Luka Doncic to the Link ridge. Hmm. Same exact source. That's insane. Think about that one article at Wall Street Journal that says what they like to the same exact punchline. That doesn't happen by accident. It goes beyond just joke thievery, though. The worst offender is Stephen Colbert, which is why Gerald is wearing the joke thief shirt. We can't see it, Tool Man. If you can go to Crowdershop.com there's the shirt. There you go. Yeah, it's quite a bit of fun. Go get it. And here's the thing. Beyond that, you see these. And I really hope that people look and I know this will be funneled through multiple different entities. Probably go to some kind of a non profit, that probably goes to the parent company, that probably goes to the network. But does anyone at this point doubt that these people are puppets for folks who tell them what to do? Because this is something else when we're not even discussing jokes. Now, we're going to get into this area of just exposing how they cover stories here. They're not even telling jokes. So, for example, it's quite important for you to know in the tariff war with Canada that there were some demands made. We told you about that, that they were asking for border security. They were asking for, of course, Canada to start carrying their own weight. Because if we shut down the southern border, well, fentanyl can just come through the northern border. Of course, the left should have said, well, there's not a lot of fentanyl coming in now. Well, that's the point. It'll just be the easy entry point unless something is done about it. So these were pretty reasonable requests that were made. And then Trudeau acquiesced and so they were paused. Right. So the tariffs existed for about two days. Mexico capitulated immediately. Canada took an extra day. All right, but imagine if you were watching these shows and by the way, I mean, every single one of these shows, late night shows, and you saw them covering this story and you didn't have another reference point, you would never have been told that Canada agreed to start helping securing the border. Spoiler alert. Just this afternoon, right? Late this afternoon, after their second phone call of the day, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Trump announced that just like with Mexico, US tariffs on Canada are going to be postponed by 30 days as the two countries negotiate a border deal. What it is, is it's fake. He is pretending to issue tariffs so that Canada and Mexico, Mexico can pretend to bend over for him and then it'll look like he's the big hero. It's like wrestling. Now, today, Mexico announced that they'd reached a deal with Trump to delay the tariffs for a month, which is fully how I expected this to play out. Because it's all bluster for the cameras, of course. By the way, since we even were writing this show at like 4pm, Trump has already said now he's going to pause the tariff war with Canada as well. Because now go to the Liberal message boards, go to Democratic Underground, if you can create an account, go to Reddit politics. Not Reddit, Liberal, not Reddit, Democrat, Reddit politics. And you will see that everyone there believes Donald Trump is a pussy who caved on his own tariffs. They don't know 10,000 guardsmen sent from Mexico to the border. They don't know billions of dollars that's going to be spent by Canada to help fight the war on fentanyl. They don't know that. That's why you can't find common ground. And then they blame you for creating an echo chamber. They blame you. Places like Politico, BBC, places like Associated Press. Places like NBC, CBS, ABC, NBC News, MSNBC, whatever it is, CNBC. So many NBC's. Too many VC's, too many. Think about that. They demand that you be banned and blame you for creating an echo chamber. They didn't cover the most important aspect of that story. Not to mention verbatim ripped each other off on jokes. And then they say people on the right can't be funny. They say, people, it's misinformation on the right. Hey, right here. All references available. They say, oh, conservatives can't be funny. Well, hey, we'll go tit for tat. You're welcome on this show anytime. You probably need the ratings. It reminds me, I'm sorry, Stephen, that I haven't written any Jamba Juice jokes. I know it's tough because it doesn't exist anymore. Sorry. I was gonna write some on Smoothie King and Orange Julius, but I thought, ah, they went back. What about Bennigan's? I'm at the point where I'd rather watch Current Day Johnny Carson and Ed McMahon. That would be more entertaining. I love it. Look, when you were putting this, you were putting in a, you know, thread and just saying, hey, guys, check this stuff out. I was like, o. Okay. I'm sure they're like, similar. I had no idea. It was like almost word for word, like in some cases. Well, here's the thing. Just going through that RFK1, all right? You have an entire day of material. An entire day of material. So you mean to tell me that each room of, let's call it 20 to 40 something writers, producers, they looked at an entire day of hearings and every single person thought that those exact time codes is her name, Carolyn Kennedy, the cousin. Every single one of them picked those exact same time codes. And those comments from a relative on RFK regarding his pet birds, which is probably the least relevant. It's basically just a character assassin. It has nothing to do with the hearings. They all settled on that. Exactly. And then all said Jamba Juice joke. That's the thing is they didn't go through all that footage They've got to be getting this information from a blog, from an email, from something like somebody who's somebody. Yeah, you know, it's. It's the approved content or whatever. They're not watching the whole day of the RFK hearings, they're getting an email that goes, hey, look what happened in the RFK hearings. And they go, oh, let's write a joke about the onesie thing. Yes, they're all getting the same one. Best case scenario, they are all using the exact same original source for their material, and then they blame you for misinformation and an echo chamber. And I'm willing to bet there absolutely are some taxpayer dollars at play there. There. The host may not even know it. I'd bet my life on it. Someone please look into it. Do we have any. Do you have anything you were bringing? So we've got. Probably. I mean, what we're hearing might be one of the best truths from Donald Trump ever. Oh, boy. I have to. Okay, I have to warm up. It's not warmed up because we have to get to the Project 2025 rally yesterday. We have some exclusive from that, and it's pretty funny, by the way. Okay, I'll get to this. But if you are not a Project 2025 rally. Right? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Which isn't a thing. But if you are not a member of Rumble Premium, we're gonna continue today. It's chat Thursday. Click that button right there, you join, and you get to continue watching 100% more show. You get Nick DePaolo, you get Mr. Guns and Gear, you get Dr. Disrespect, you get Russell Brand, you get Donald Trump Jr. And you get the entire experience ad free. This is actually independently funded media, so I know you probably have subscription fatigue, but I guarantee you this is the only subscription that. That the government is not paying for. Or it's not the only one they're not paying for, but it's the only one I can guarantee you they're not paying for. We think Media Matters still has a subscription, but that's just one guy. I know for a fact they do. It's Jason, right? They fact check, Jason. They fact check the Rumble Premium segments. Jason Campbell. Hi, Jason. Hi, Jason. Hey, buddy. Hey. Want to see my dick? All right. I'm just kidding. I was just gonna tell him to stay in school. Stay in school, Jason. That's. That's my thing. You could end up being being a reporter. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Come on, Jason. I'm not gonna bullshit you. Yeah. I'm not gonna bullshit. You stay in school. Right. Hey, don't bang kids. That's our thing. We don't sleep with kids. People who don't. Who didn't tune in yesterday. It makes no sense. Yeah, if you did, that was worth the price. Admission, which is nothing right now. Jason's going, don't tell me how to live my life. Don't tell me what's. You're not the boss of me, my man. He's gonna tweet about, like, Steven Crowder told me he's gonna show me his dick. I. No, he offered you. He asked permission. As long as it is consensual, I have no problem with it. Have you ever offered to see somebody? Did you ever offer to show someone your penis and they said, no, you didn't do it? Maisie Hirona retweets it. I have on good authority that Steven has small circumcised penis. All right. I mean, you know, you need to have something next to it for scale, but you use M and Ms. Yes. Hello. Ah, nerds. Yeah. All right, let's grab. Let's grab the Truth Social. This just came out right now. This is. It's. Oh, it's almost 11:00 Eastern. All right. Okay. All right. This came out this morning. Okay. The Gaza Strip would be turned over to the United States by Israel at the conclusion of fighting the Palestinians. People like Chuck Schumer would have already been resettled in far safer and. Resettling Chuck Schumer. I don't even get that. Am I reading this right? Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. I think so. The Palestinians, people like Chuck Schumer would have already been resettled in far safer and beautiful communities with new and modern homes in the region. They would actually have a chance to be happy, safe, and free. And it's all about freedom. The US Working with great development teams from all over the world, would slowly, carefully begin the construction of what would become one of the greatest and most spectacular developments of its kind on Earth. No soldiers by the US Would be needed. Stability for the region would reign. Three exclamation marks. Three. I don't know. That's the best ever. It just. I go with what I'm told. Yes. So it's all right. I still like the Barney Frank one. Yeah, the Barney Frank was the funk that I can remember. Here's a fun one. So we actually. We have undercover journalists everywhere across this country. And, you know, we used to really have to pay a lot of attention and spend a lot of time infiltrating these leftist Groups, troops. You saw that with the Pussy March and you saw that with Antifa and the like, where it led to some arrests. Now, I will say this. I still expect it to get worse. I still expect the left to pop off at some point. There isn't going to be the same kind of centralized organization as you saw from Black Lives Matter or these other giant marches. The left is kind of in disarray. It's like their generals have been picked off. You ever see the Patriot? Feels a lot like that, yeah. So they did have a rally yesterday. You probably didn't know about it. It took place across the country. But again, you probably didn't know about it. It was the Reject Project 2025 rally. And we sent a reporter out to New York City hall to chat with some of these anti fascist protesters and get to the bottom of why they think or how they rationalize that Donald Trump is a fascist. Spoiler. They don't. All fascist countries, as they get more and more authoritarian, they tend to go in that direction. This is the Revcom Corps for the Emancipation of Humanity, and I'm its New York spokesperson. The Revcom Corps for the Emancipation of Humanity. What's happening right now is the imposition of a fascist regime. You know, this continues to get worse and worse. If we don't put a stop to what's going on right now, you know, we could lose some freedom of speech. We think that we're free because we have freedom of speech. We are very much in check as the American people. Eating cats and eating dogs with no proof whatsoever, not fighting any forces, control our bodies, control our minds.