Podcast Summary: Louder with Crowder

Episode Title: NY Times Goes Full Simp for Deported Jamaican Kidnapper
Release Date: April 25, 2025

Introduction

In this episode of Louder with Crowder, hosts Tim Pool, Vince Bongino, Josh, and Gerald delve into a provocative New York Times (NYT) article that highlights the deportation of a Jamaican national convicted of kidnapping. The discussion is marked by sharp critiques of media portrayals of criminals seeking redemption and the broader implications for immigration policies.

Critique of the NY Times Article

The centerpiece of the episode is the hosts' critical analysis of an NYT piece that seemingly attempts to humanize a Jamaican immigrant deported after serving a 15-year sentence for kidnapping. The hosts express skepticism and frustration over what they perceive as the media's tendency to "simp" for criminals by highlighting their rehabilitative efforts post-incarceration.

• Tim Pool (00:01): Introduces the topic, expressing disbelief at the NYT's portrayal. "This is an entire article from the New York Times bemoaning the deportation of a Jamaican migrant under Donald Trump's policies. And I'm still not convinced that it isn't satire." [00:01]

• Vince Bongino (10:16): Points out the flawed logic in the NYT's narrative. "If they're really, really looking to do a profile on the poor, innocent, hardworking, law-abiding migrant who accidentally gets deported and instead you end up with MS-13 gang member." [16:22]

• Josh (17:48): Highlights the disparity between the subject’s criminal background and the sympathetic portrayal. "He didn't rape anybody, but I mean, he's easily...a kidnapper. You can't be here. You’re never allowed to be here. You kidnap somebody, guns in your..." [17:48]

Analysis of Police Practices: Montana Cop Bingo

The conversation shifts to discuss an incident in Bozeman, Montana, where police officers engaged in a "Cop Bingo" game during their shifts. The hosts criticize the practice as incentivizing unethical policing behaviors.

• Police Chief Jim Veltkamp (10:52): Explains the Bingo game used by officers to track their duties, highlighting its problematic nature. "Two teams of patrol officers were engaged in a bingo competition with success hinging on whether they completed actions listed on their cards." [10:52]

• Tim Pool (13:23): Mocks the trivial and inappropriate categories on the Bingo cards. "But what is a prize? It could be a box of donuts. It could be bragging rights." [12:00]

• Vince Bongino (13:38): Emphasizes the potential for abuse in such practices. "I can see how this would go a little bit awry if you want to win Bac." [13:38]

Media Narratives and Rehabilitation

The hosts further dissect the NYT article, arguing that it downplays the criminal actions of the deported individual by focusing on his rehabilitation and positive developments post-incarceration.

• Tim Pool (22:38): Criticizes the NYT for not addressing the severity of the crimes committed. "They committed kidnapping, they held someone against their will, pistol-whipping him, and yet the article laments his deportation." [22:38]

• Vince Bongino (24:11): Questions the integrity of media narratives that favor redemption stories over accountability. "They write it like, hey, we have to look for who we should deport. Somebody who has no business being here. You did 15 years for kidnapping. You're gone." [24:11]

• Josh (31:06): Acknowledges the possibility of rehabilitation but maintains that serious crimes warrant deportation. "I think people can be rehabilitated. Sure. But kidnapped somebody? You can't be here. You’re never allowed to be here." [31:06]

Discussion on Deportation Procedures and Outcomes

The hosts examine the deportation process and its impact on individuals with criminal backgrounds, arguing that the system lacks consistency and harshly penalizes those with serious offenses.

• Tim Pool (25:23): Highlights the inefficiencies and punitive nature of the deportation system. "If Mr. Blair pleaded guilty to kidnapping, it's absurd that his rehabilitative efforts are overshadowed by his crimes." [25:23]

• Vince Bongino (32:02): Criticizes the romanticized view of the deported individual's efforts to rebuild his life. "He bought an 18-foot box truck, intending to one day have a trucking fleet. But he gave it up for kidnapping and stuff." [32:02]

• Josh (43:37): Points out the lack of substantial evidence in the defense's portrayal. "They find a kid tied up in the apartment with guns and marijuana. How do they make it seem innocent?" [43:37]

Conclusion and Takeaways

The discussion culminates in a reaffirmation of the hosts' stance that media outlets like the NYT overly sympathize with individuals convicted of serious crimes, thereby undermining public safety and effective immigration policies. They advocate for a more stringent approach to deporting those with violent backgrounds to protect societal interests.

• Tim Pool (56:47): Summarizes the necessity of deporting serious offenders. "We need to focus on deporting individuals who have no business being here and have a history of violent crimes." [56:47]

• Vince Bongino (59:55): Emphasizes accountability and the importance of recognizing criminal actions over rehabilitative narratives. "If someone kidnapped, you're never allowed to stay. It's that simple." [59:55]

Notable Quotes

• Tim Pool: "This is an entire article from the New York Times bemoaning the deportation of a Jamaican migrant... I'm still not convinced that it isn't satire." [00:01]

• Vince Bongino: "They write it like, hey, we have to look for who we should deport. Somebody who has no business being here. You did 15 years for kidnapping. You're gone." [24:11]

• Josh: "I think people can be rehabilitated. Sure. But kidnapped somebody? You can't be here. You’re never allowed to be here." [31:06]

Final Thoughts

This episode of Louder with Crowder offers a critical perspective on media portrayals of criminals within the immigration system, questioning the balance between rehabilitation and accountability. The hosts argue for a firmer stance on deporting individuals with violent pasts to ensure public safety and uphold the integrity of immigration policies.

Note: This summary is based on the provided transcript and aims to encapsulate the primary discussions without endorsing or reflecting the views expressed by the participants.