← Louder with Crowder
Louder with Crowder
The Hunter Biden X Tucker Carlson Interview Was A Masterclass in Subversion
01:08:07
Loading summary
Transcript1 lines
- [00:01]
A
Welcome to the Rumble lineup live. We don't need your waps, your guineas, your slopes, zipper heads. I'm trying to pick the racial epithets that are kind of okay, but not okay for. But I love the way that guy says it. Your doctors, your engineers, a lot to get to today. Dijonay Carrington. It's just, it's really hard for me to say because dijon in French means breakfast and then Dijon is mustard, so her name is mustard. Breakfast. Yum. The whole white privilege thing, it's hilarious. We're going to cover, but more importantly, there was an interview with one Hunter Biden and Tucker Carlson. And you know how like it was one of the biggest stories of the election 2020, the Hunter Biden laptop story. And we were at the center of it with a lot of that sort of breaking on this show. And Rudy Giuliani having procured was a perfect example of collusion between the three letter agencies claiming was Russian disinformation. Big tech and the media dismissing it as Russian disinformation. We know that that would have changed the outcome of the election had it been allowed to circulate because it was a legitimate story. Well, Tucker and Hunter wipe it all out and say, no, no, no, it's the Jews. It was Israel. So it's actually not a legitimate story. Combine that with Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk. This is a very clear cut example of political violence coming from the left. Someone who is radicalized by the LGBTQ AIP agenda killed one of our guys. Well, no, there's no one radicalized from the left. It's the Jews. So the left isn't violent, we're not under threat. And the left doesn't really have any systemic control over media bias or corrupt three letter agencies. There's no reason to fear the left, is there? They're not a concern, just the Jews. I don't think it's a good place to go. Also, President Trump, a lot of executive orders that have been overlooked, but I think more importantly overlooked. The opposition to to the executive orders draws a pretty clear contrast. So you let me know where you think there's been the greatest misstep here. Fumbling the ball as far as momentum that we had as a country. And we'll talk about it on with the show. After the battle of 2020, Crowder readies before the legions of big tecaply our mud club warriors are outnumbered and exhausted. But it is not fear that grips them, only a heightened sense of things. Cool air in their lungs, the wind sweeping the plugs which stand atop the head of the professed victor. The former vice president and would be God King sits atop his throne as he speak to an undefeated foe. Crowder. Despite your insufferable arrogance, the God King has come to admire your fighting spirit and your mugs. You could make a mighty ally, man. Even in light of your continued insults, your horrid hate speech blasphemies, the Lord of hosts is prepared to forgive all and more to reward your service. You. You fight for your channel, man. Keep it. You fight for your whole thing. Keep them too. Your victory will be complete if you but lay down your arms and kneel before your holy former vice. Click Rumble Premium and join now for 99 annually or 9.99amonth to get the entirely ad free experience and an ever expanding roster of content creators and free speech. I can never watch that intro. For those of you who know who saw behind the Scene, that's when I broke my. My femur and snapped my kneecap. And whenever I watch it, I still think I go, you guys have question of the day? You have any injuries that are so bad that if you think of it, you. It like actually in the. I feel it in my. Halfway down my thigh where I. Where I cracked my femur and knee. I just. I can't do it. I can't do it. I'm glad we got the first take done then. We did get the first take. Someone should have. Someone should have maybe not put a slippery rug down in the green room, but it makes for good tv. Captain Morgan, CEO, how are you? Fantastic. My knees are fine. Yeah. Well, also, you had a debate this weekend here. Went well with you with Andrew Wilson. On the other side was Alex Jones. Alex Jones. Kai Schwimmer, Joel Webbin. And why am I blanking on his name right now? I'm gonna feel really bad. Joe Kent. Joe Kent. But it went well. And you said things were kept, you know, civil. And afterwards, you guys were all. You're all. I got heated. But it's pretty cool. So hopefully we'll be able to see. We'll see when it comes out and what they take out. All right, and then Friday, Saturday, November 27th, 28th, at the Skyline Comedy Club in Appleton, Wisconsin. Great little town, actually. Josh Firestein. How are you, sir? Good, good. That's Thanksgiving weekend, by the way. Assuming that Francesca Hong King Kong doesn't win governor. Oh, that's not Thanksgiving. Yeah, it is. Francesca Hong King Kong. Come on now. I think it's. Yeah. She beats on her chest and takes away Thanksgiving. I think you changed your name. Oh, come on, dude. It wasn't racist, though. King Kong is a gorilla. You know, she's a. Basically a terrorist so she could take down some planes. The slope who stole Thanksgiving? Oh, my God, that was racist. I don't need your epic. That is only for me to discuss. She prefers Dragon lady. I called her Hong King Kong. King Kong is a misunderstood creature. He's full, alive and misunderstood. We don't need your King Kongs. We don't need your perch, monkey ass. I'm confused about the rulebooks. Obviously King Kong is on the porch with this dude, Rocking chair. We don't want him. We don't need your Mothras. We don't need your Mothra. We don't need your mat. You, Broderick. Godzilla rehash. Let's go to Cambridge, England. Like how I get admonished. They. They installed some new, like some pay toilets, which I guess are pretty, pretty common, you know, in England that's a big thing where there's this whole social justice, like, oh, thank gosh. You have to pay to take a dump, but use the loo. You should have to pay for a dump. Yeah, you should. Yeah, maybe it's free to pee, but that sounds good. It's an apple. Pay to dump. Well, it's a big thing. In New York, they were like paid to use porta Potties and they were like quarter potties, I think they were called. And then people got mad. Well, some people can't afford them. So you just all go back to the awful porta potties where you either get AIDS or meet George Michael. Now, Cambridge, England, they installed some new pay toilets. Okay, good. Let's get past the social justice aspect. And then you realize that, well, they're not exactly the potties that you would expect. Well, here the toilets are located at one of the key entry points for the coach loads of international tourists who make a beeline for everything that Cambridge has to offer. Possibly it should be free, but we've decided to start at £1. We'll see how it goes. But it does mean that we can have an attendant here for three hours in the morning and three hours in the afternoon to make sure that it's kept clean and safe. Down below, there are squat toilets as well as the flushing toilets at street level and accessible loo. Yes, I think you've skimmed over that. They are indeed squat toilets where it's just a hole in the ground and you take your dump in the hole in the ground because we, you know, we have toilets. The Japanese have very advanced toilets. Some people still prefer to take shit in a hole in the ground, so we give them one. The BBC even brought on a toilet historian to talk about the new facilities because everything is about patriarchy and social justice now. Is a pound a lot to spend in a public toilet? It is. When you think about the fact that everybody should have access to public toilets and not everybody may be able to spend that pound every time. They're also often contactless only now, which poses a problem for people who maybe don't have access to bank cards. So. Oh, Lord. I do think it's quite a lot. Even though we should be paying, you know, toilet attendance fairly as well. Am I right in understanding that? Hold on, pause, pause, pause. Well, I think it's expensive. Obviously we shouldn't have to pay anything to defile public facilities. But I want to make sure that she's also paid because she's very unlikely to sit by idly by for the absolute murder scene going to take place in the hole in the ground toilet for. For free. So we want to compensate, but we don't want to pay. Any ideas? No, you feckless can't. All right, let's keep watching as well. Am I right in understanding that there are squatting toilets there as well? It's a hole in the ground. Pedestals. Is that the right. Some men wear dresses. Yes. So we've got the sort of what we would consider the classic porcelain ball and a toilet, squat toilet, which is actually those across the world than there are of the ones that we're used to. I don't think I know many people who would prefer that kind of toilet. Well, yes, but you don't understand that many of the people visiting from India are animals. So we consider this quite a bit of progress because honestly, in India's two thirds just shit in the streets. I don't even use a corner. We. We've evolved. It's like having a horse and carriage for somebody instead of a car. It's like, yeah, but we've got a car. It's like saying there are more people on earth who don't have access to running. To running water or clean water or electricity. Oh, well, sucks for them. I get it. I want it. I don't wanna spend more money for the hole in the ground option either. There's no need. Put another toilet there. And by the way, here's the thing. The Japanese and I don't wanna. I don't wanna sound like a, you know, a eugenics person or Racial supremacy person. But you have to understand that the Japanese absolutely believed that they were destined to be the Pan Pacific superior race. They were sort of like, you know, the Nazis, but they saw all of the other Asians as significantly lower on the evolutionary totem pole. That's awful. It's terrible. But it's true. But when you see. True. When you see how we have to teach Chinese to not shit on the floor, maybe you understand. This is actual video from lain in Japan. I know. So sorry to offend Mochikosu, Mr. Chinaman, but actually expect you to sit on a seat. Not stand to sit on seat. We call this move the samurai seat. That's right. Sit like a samurai civilized person. That's right. We don't. I know. We all the same. All cultures are equal. We just don't sit in the ground. Not anymore. Oh, my good. Also, I wear pants. That's right. Cannot shit on the floor if I am wearing pants. Good point. There's a shit in my pants and then I shit falls down the pendant rag and then fall out like a black radiant supermarket. Sorry, wet the market. You know, with my luck, if I was visiting Cambridge, with my luck, I'd have to take a so bad. And then I'd walk in, be like, this is the only one available. Somebody else walks in, I forget to lock it. Someone walks in. I got all my clothes off, I'm squatting over. Get out. You just see the guy in the stall next to you. You're kidding me. Some Chinese lady taking a picture of my hair. No, no, no, no. All cultures are equal. Let's walk through this. In Japan, we have a toilet seat that adjust to your height, change the temperature so you don't have cold seat issue. Actually bidet that will circulate in massaging fashion and even have a blow dryer that is pretty much the same compared to ground. We have a place called the Suicide Forest. It used to be a toilet. Maybe we bring it back for the Chinese. Franchise location. I know that laugh. That's the devious laugh of the bad guy from. From Shogun. Hey, we got a serious show. Yeah, we do. One thing's for sure. I will tell you this. Our bathroom attendant beats all other bathroom attendants, hands down. What's a mint? Ooh, heavens to batchy. I place your patronage. What are you? I'm the new bath mechanic. Hold on, I'll get you all set up. Looks like that time of the week. Am I right? I got tampons here. I think this is a vape. Might Be a tampon. It's got a piece of linguine hanging off the other. I actually got pads with wings. No, thanks. You don't like wings? No, I have a flightless one. No, thank you. No. Where you going? Finally, I get a wiper and not a shaker. Hey, where you going? What's a mint? All right, we do. We have a serious show to get to. We're going to get to Hunter Biden, Tucker Carlson, and of course, the executive orders versus the opposition. But first, Dijonay Carrington. So we show. Okay, let me just walk you through this. What? Did I say it wrong? Carrington's white. Dijonay. Dijonay. It's not a real thing. Dijonay. Breakfast. Dijon mustard. Right. They just made it up. So yesterday we talked about this, but there's an update, right? She fouled Sophie Cunningham. Was big news. Here's a quick review. Gets her across the face, coming down, trying to prevent the layup, but that is just. Okay, so you saw that, then you saw that deep. Dijonay claimed that her ejection from the game was a result of white privilege. And then this commentator, who is usually quite racist, Emmanuel Acho, said that the foul was not because of white privilege. And then she responded in a very racist way. Again, Dijonay's intention was to play the ball. Her impact was all on Sophie Cunningham's head. So as a result, the refs made the right call. Dijonay, you hit her in the head and you drew blood. It was a flagrant 2. You should have been ejected. No more, no less. This brings us to the latest installment of Try not to Be Racist. Should I do it? I'm gonna do it. Some of them armed with guns. I'm gonna be feeling like it ain't no smart sexual contact with an unresponsive man. I forgot how much I love that. So Dijonay Carrington wrote on X responding to Acho. Yeah, wrote. I never once claimed that the assessment of the foul was white privilege. That was your assumption. Okay, all right, you know what? Fine, I'll out. She'll explain it. I mean, I'm sure she's gonna. She's gonna explain it. I. I know. I know. She. I know. Try exercising your critical thinking skills. I know you studied psych. Furthermore, I'm the last thing from ignorant or asinine when it comes to speaking on white privilege. Do your research on that one. I actually went to school, one of the top universities, might I add, to educate myself on this exact subject. She does. She Has a double major, I think, in psych and African American studies. I would never use that term as a rhetorical weapon, knowing the historical and social weight it holds without having the proper evidence to substantiate it. I never once claimed that the assessment of the foul was white privilege. Okay, okay, so what was it about? He fouled her, he rejected. He said white privilege. She's like. I didn't say it because the foul. She cause the foul. Okay, so then what? They went on to have a discussion, by the way, back and forth. There was like three or four more tweets between them. The result is exactly that. It was because white players don't get called on the same. Exact. And that because she got called as white. So same thing. Yes, exactly. I never once claimed. I get that right. The foul was white privilege. But if you go on later on you will see that I say that a white person would not be filed. I was fouled because I'm black, ergo white privilege. That sounds like the very first thing. I already told you. I never once claimed that. But you just did. Did I? Yes, Multiple times, you stupid person. Also, it's important to note like this. This whole thing of her being tough and being one of the girls, you know, the wnba, like wearing the blonde wigs. It's very, very different. She went to Stanford. She came from a well to do family. It just would appear that she doesn't know her place. She's trying to find herself. Maybe she's really living up to the eloquence of her name. Dijonay as an aristocrat. Pardon me, Would you have any shrill ghetto bitch? You mean the basketball player? Yes. Would you have any aggressive for classless? Both, actually. What? What? What? Dunno. I'm axing you, but I axed you. Fairs you. Is this about the shrill ghetto again? Yes. I don't know what. Sometimes I don't even know what we're trying to say. She in the trunk or. I don't. Is that ownership? I don't know if that was a Japanese man driving up next to a Chinese man and just roll his window like. Excuse me, do you have any. Never mind. Where you going, sir? I have no need for sewer rat. Hey, that's not me. That's what I cook my noodle in. True story. Here's the thing. Black or white, let's bridge the racial divide. Everyone can benefit from Rumble Wallet. Yeah, I like the content they're putting out. I'm gonna have to send them a tip. All right, Bye. Gerald. You should Use these to send the tip of the Billy Bucks. What's that? Billy Bucks. It's this new, fast, efficient way to send your content creators tips. How does it work? It's very, very simple. You just send me pesos, I transfer it to Billy Bucks, and then we mail the Billy Bucks out to the content creator. Wait, so if I want to tip, say, like, Nick Depaulo, first I have to send you $20, and then you're gonna send it 20 pesos? You send me 20 pesos? Pesos? Yeah, the Mexican peso. Why? It's not technically legal to do this with American dollars yet. So this is kind of the workaround we got going right now. You know what? I think I'm just gonna stick with Rumble Wallet. Thanks, though. What's. What's Rumble Wallet? Oh, dude, it's simple. It's this encrypted, non custodial wallet that you have complete control over with your passkey that nobody can get access to. You could tip your favorite creators in Bitcoin, whatever you want to do. Is this something new that they're working on? No, actually, it's already out there. Here. Who. Who knows about this? Everyone. Oh, no. This is really not good for Billy Box. I'm gonna call my plug here. Is that a telegraph machine? Take control of your money easily with Rumble Wallet. Download now at wallet.rumble.com crowder and use the code CROWDER5 to claim $5 in US stablecoin. All right, Tucker Carlson, Hunter Biden. Before I move on here, your thoughts. It's like these and carrots. So I'm going to play through what we've edited down. I highly recommend you go watch a whole interview interview. And then I'm going to play it again with some fact checks because it's tough to present this anyway. There are some very, very blatant lies. And then I'll present to you my suspicions as to why. First off, let me start with. Here are some of the things that they did not discuss. Hunter Biden's inappropriate behavior around his niece, Banging his dead brother's wife. 10% for the big guy. The Ashley Biden diary. The China business dealings, other foreign ties. Dropping a gun in a trash can outside of a school. School tax evasion. The paternity case. Or his penis next to Eminem's Peanuts penis. M and M's peanuts. Eminem's next to his penis. He put his dick next to Eminem's. None of those things discussed. Instead, the interview focused on largely how the whole Hunter Biden laptop story that was an example of media bias and big tech collusion with three letter agencies. Actually, it was Israel. We get approached by Israelis connected to Benjamin Netanyahu. Like, I know that. Yeah. Who are shopping this stuff to me at Fox News. Yeah. And I'm like, I don't think that that part of the story. The laptop is real. I thought that from day one. But the way that it entered the bloodstream. Exactly. American media was not real. So I just want to ask you point blank, did you drop off laptops? No. And this is the thing that I've said over and over again. I have literally zero recollection or memory of ever dropping off a laptop at John Paul Mac Isaac's. No. The answer is no. And John Paul McCarthy wild. The laptop, according to Lev Parness, under oath in his testimony before the House Oversight Committee, was being solved by Rudy Giuliani in Ukraine in all the way back in 2018. Lie. And so Rudy Giuliani is working with a guy named Andre Derkach, who was a MP in Ukraine and a known Russian GRU agent. So Rudy goes over there and basically takes his dossier and receives information that Hunter Biden's hard drive, not laptop, is for sale. So when anybody says Hunter Biden, what's your first thought? Laptop. You know, can I just say one thing, though, that this is what I experienced during that time, the allegation that there was abusive minors on the laptop that came from the Israelis. I'm just telling you that they came to me with that. So I know that. And one of the things that enraged me about the statement from those sleazy intel guys is that they blame the Russians for it. Now, maybe the Russians had a hand in it, but it was the Israelis who were pushing that fact. Fact. I mean, literally, to me. Yeah. So. And you've gone through it. But there are all such things. Is there anything I just. I want to clear with. With your entire, like, you know, not a single thing in my. Anything that is in any way true about that. But they were pushing that so hard. And all the retail guys are like, oh, it's Russia. It's like, you lie. You lie. That's true. They called me. I sent one of my producers out to go meet with one of guy who connected to Netanyahu. They were. They were behind that. And I felt that everybody in D.C. knew that, but there was so much pressure never to criticize Israel in any way that they were just like, it's the Russians, it's the Russians. They're the ones penetrating our Political system. It's like, you lie. Everyone knows what's actually happening. That this was my perspective and it drove me insane. And by the way, I didn't say that on Fox News. I'll admit it. No, he has integrity now. Yeah, I didn't. You're right. I just want to say I was part of the problem also. But I knew he's. As opposed to now he's not part of a problem where he presents, very cleverly, he presents the dynamic of. Right. The intel. They were trying to say it was Russia because really it was Israel. No, no, no, no. And by the way, one of the people on that committee who declared it to be most likely Russian disinformation was Dana Bash's ex husband. You want to talk about the elites? This is one of those things where they say the elites want you fighting against each other so that you don't, you don't actually focus on them. The elites in our three letter agencies and of course the entire Democrat party media, big tech, they wanted this story buried. Why? Because we now know it's become a case study. It would have affected the outcome of the election. So this dynamic wasn't, they said Russia when really it was Israel. They said it was Russian disinformation so that this story, which would have affected the election was completely removed and blocked from being circulated anywhere online, even though it was a real story. So when the real dynamic was big government, big tech, big media colluding to put their thumb on the scales of the election. He's saying it was Rush, it was them trying to blame Russia because really it was Israel. So let's go through that again and as always, I'll provide all the references links in the description where I'm going to play. Pause and go through the verifiable lies. Some of them obviously can just be misstatements. In these cases, lies play. We get approached by Israelis connected to Benjamin Netanyahu, like, I know that. Who are shopping this stuff to me at Fox News. And I'm like, I don't think that that part of the story. The laptop is real. I thought that from day one. But the way that it entered the bloodstream. Exactly. American media was not real. So I just want to ask you point blank, did you drop off laptops? No. And this is the thing that Paul said. Lie. Yes, he did. He signed for it. He signed a receipt for an $85 repair for three MacBook Pros. His own legal team never disputed. That he dropped off the laptop would be the easiest argument to make. That's not his signature. He didn't drop them off. They all but conceded it. That's a lie. And that's used to set everything else up. Let's continue over and over again. I have literally zero recollection of memory of ever dropping off a laptop. Well, pause. Of course. Of course you wouldn't. You were high as a kite. You were smoking the walls. Keep playing. Paul McIsaac. No. The answer is no. And John Paul. The laptop, according to Lev Parnas, under oath in his testimony before the House Oversight Committee, was being sought by Rudy Giuliani in Ukraine in all the way back in 2018. Lie. Pause. Okay, this timeline makes no sense whatsoever. Lev Parnas does make the claim that Ukraine told him about the laptop in February of 20. There is zero corroborating evidence. He himself, the guy, he said and claimed that the information didn't show up in Ukraine until May 2019 after the laptop was in the shop, to be clear. So his timeline doesn't add up. He's saying 2018. It's not actually possible. And he's pointing you to evidence that doesn't exist. Let's continue playing. Please check out the references because we are giving you actual evidence. Go. And so Rudy Giuliani is working with a guy named Andre Derkach, who was an MP in Ukraine and a known Russian GRU agent. Pause. Lie. Lie. He didn't meet with Dirk Hatch until December 2019, and he is not a GRU agent. To be clear, that meeting didn't really have anything to do with the laptop. As I understand it, meeting produced those edited Joe Biden Petro Peshenko tapes. You remember that? So, no, he was. But the most. He just goes, known GRU agent. Nope, not true. So again, this matters because I didn't drop off a laptop. Yes, you did. Well, they said that this was in Ukraine in 2018. It's not possible. They didn't say that. They said it under oath. That's a lie. This guy who's a known GRU agent, that's a lie. Verifiably so. Now, I want you to trust me when I say this isn't a real story, it's disinformation from Israel. Everything you've said thus far that we can verify is a flat out lie. And he's not being questioned. I guess that's just reserved for people like Ted Cruz. Keep playing. Rudy goes over there and basically takes his dossier and receives information that Hunter Biden's hard drive, not laptop, is for sale. So when anybody says Hunter Biden. What's your first thought? Laptop. You know, can I just say one thing, though? That this is what I experienced during that time. The allegation that there was abusive minors on the laptop that came from the Israelis. I'm just telling you that they came to me with that. So I know that. And one of the things that enraged me about the statement. So pause. Here's the thing. It's not a lie to say that it could have come from the Israelis. It's a lie to say I know that because that is a claim without any evidence and it's entirely hearsay from Tucker. Now, what he is talking about is that not Hunter Biden and his niece, where there was some at least inappropriate behavior. They're not even talking about Ashley Biden and the allegations or sort of the writings that maybe implied her father was sexually inappropriate or at the very least nude with a daughter beyond the age of propriety. There was a separate conspiracy that there was sexual abuse of minors which did not exist. And that circulated. And we do have proof that there were some. Some Chinese YouTubers who were first to circulate that rumor, just to be clear. So that's the first place that we could find circulating that rumor. And that is something that does happen when people try and poison the. Well, you know, something is going on, for example, like with Epstein, where there's a lot there. And then people go, actually they were drinking the blood of children in this satanic cab. Hold on a second. That often happens where someone comes in to discredit what is legitimately there. But Tucker just goes, it's it. All of this Israel. The proof that we have here is that he doesn't know. And it started with a Chinese YouTuber. Let's keep playing sleazy intel, guys. Is that they blame the Russians for it. Now, maybe the Russians had a hand in it, but it was the Israelis who are pushing that fact. Fact. I mean, literally. Maybe none of them had a hand. And a high person. Hunter Biden dropped off a laptop where the shop themselves said, uh, he just dropped it off and forgot about it and never picked it back up. Maybe that. Cause you know what? None of that was really disputed by his legal team. So maybe the most likely explanation is the explanation that was given by the owner, slash employee of the shop and his own legal counsel didn't defend against. Keep playing through it. But there are all such. Is there anything I just. I'm going to clear with. With your entire, like, you know, not a single thing in my. Anything that is in any way. True about that, but they were pushing that so hard. And all the retail guys are like, oh, it's Russia. It's like, you lie. You lie. Because they called me. I sent one of my producers out to go meet with one of guy with connectors to Netanyahu. They were. They were behind that. And I felt that everybody in D.C. knew that. But there was so much pressure never to criticize Israel in any way, that they were just like, it's the Russians. It's the Russians. They're. They're the ones penetrating our political system. It's like, you lie. Everyone knows what's actually happening. That this was my perspective and it drove me insane. And by the way, I didn't say that on Fox News. I'll admit it. I didn't. Yeah, I didn't. You're right. I just want to say I was part of the problem also, but I knew it. Yeah. And just be clear, he didn't say it at Fox News. We went back. We could show you the clip. He didn't say it. So he had no integrity back then. He really believed it was Israel. Didn't say it. But he's telling the truth now. He didn't mean it. When you see all of his private texts saying that he hates Donald Trump and that his voters are idiots and he reviles them. He's not an elitist who was born with a silver spoon to the Swanson Foods fortune. No, no. He really is a man of the people. Now, he was a piece of crap back then who was lying to you, but not now. Now he's telling you the truth. Well, let me tell you because I live this in real time. And the laptop was shown on this show from Rudy Giuliani, and obviously it was a laptop that had taken his hard drive. So I don't wanna do the wordplay of laptop, hard drive where they transfer things. At no point was there ever any mention of Israel. Hey, could he have been bought and paid off by Israel? I mean, I guess. Could the receipts have been. I guess you'd think his defense team would have used that at any point in time. No. We understood there was a story that he dropped off his laptop, dropped off these hard drives at, effectively, a computer repair shop, never went to go pick them up. And the guy offered it to people who might be interested, including Giuliani. And the feds came in, right, and took everything from Rudy Giuliani's apartment except for that they had no interest while they were simultaneously saying it was Russian disinformation. Now, let me ask you, do you. Who would have the biggest interest in the middle of election 2020, the most vested interest in burying a story that was incredibly damning to the Biden family and their corruption? Maybe allies of the Bidens like those in media, like those in big tech, who wanted, who had endorsed and given hundreds of millions of dollars to Biden. Maybe they might have the best, the most vested interest to say, hey, it's Russian disinformation, which we know beyond any shadow of a doubt is false. Or I guess, I guess Israel wanted Trump to win so badly. And anyone else. Here's the thing. Tucker's letting you know I was a piece of crap back then, but now you have to question anyone who covered this story because all of them did it for Israel, right? Hunter, you're just an innocent man caught up in the fray. Why it seems like there's this effort to rehabilitate Hunter Biden, who really is a piece of shit. Why would that be? Well, let me give you a couple of reasons here. Tucker Carlson and Hunter, they've been friends for a very long time. A very long time. This is from Chuck Ross, an investigative reporter at Daily Caller site that, by the way, was started by Tucker Carlson. He wrote funny story in 2020 after the Hunter laptop came out. Journalist at the Daily Caller, the site Tucker Carlson founded, the site where I worked, came across emails that showed Tucker asking Hunter Biden to write a letter of recommendation for his son to get into Georgetown. Well, back then he was elitist, palling around with known Democrats who were destroying the country. But not now. He grew his integrity bone. Now, just so you know. Well, back then, of course, he was acting in the way that he tells you, you should revile these elitists. Right, right. All. All rubbing elbows and getting each other into. Into higher education, which he also shunned, but wants his son to go to Georgetown. But not now, just so you know, now he has integrity. Us caller reporters thought this would be a great way to refute Biden World's claims at that time that the laptop emails were fake or illegitimate. Someone who emailed with Hunter could verify their authenticity. We thought Tucker would be more than happy to help and no ill will was intended. But no, no, Tucker lashed out at the Daily Caller employee who is tasked with contacting him about this, saying that a story on that would be an attack on my family quote or something along those lines, meaning this would have been an easy way to verify that the story was authentic. Because you have those emails exchanged between Hunter Biden and Tucker Carlson. They said, hey, good. This would give us a scoop where we can verify the authenticity. Because you would know if you were the one in the emails. Tucker, he said, don't release it. It'll hurt me. Because I don't want people to know that I asked him for a favor to get my kid into Georgetown. Yeah, but he has integrity now. And for proof as far as how damning this laptop would have been, look no further than some of the pictures themselves. Remember this picture? That was. Yeah, a fun one. Well, apparently that's not just a snapshot, but it's actually a frozen image taken from a video found on a laptop. You're never going to get my love. Let's see. He didn't need to be concerned. That just makes him seem cool. Come on. Look at that bow tie. Yeah, it's fun. You're bringing back the bow tie. Classy dance. So that's why he wears some bow tie now. Bow tie stays on. Here's the other thing. Okay. And no one else is going to want to talk about this because they're afraid. Remember. Remember the lawyer, Brian Friedman we talked about? The Trevor Bauer case destroyed his Major League baseball career. Right, Right. He was being accused of sexual assault by a woman who knowingly faked it. Right. Who lost in court. She had these bruises, but then there were images that showed she obviously didn't have those bruises after the altercation in her text saying, I'm gonna get that bag. And she was specifically targeting Trevor Bauer to try and get money from him. And Brian Freeman was the one representing her to shake down this guy and refuse to hand over evidence that would have proven it beyond a doubt. Yeah, that Brian Friedman. Well, here's the thing. He is a lawyer for Tucker Carlson. He also represents Hunter Biden, or at least did in his fight against Fox News. So he represented Tucker Carlson in his exit from Fox News, and he represents Hunter Biden, notably in his cases against Fox News. He also represented Megyn Kelly in her NBC exit, and I believe still represents Megyn Kelly to this day. He also was very, very publicly praised. I don't know if he actually represents this person, but has been amplified by and praised by Candace Owens. This one lawyer connects all of them. I am going to show you a clip of Baldani's lawyer, who I like very much. Brian Friedman. I like Brian Friedman. He seems like a tiger, and I can just sense he's telling the truth. I've got good vibes. Mommy intuition. This man is telling the truth. Carrie writes, I Got mommy intuition too, girl. And I get good vibes from the Baldoni's lawyer also. Yeah, he's just telling the truth. Brian Friedman is telling the truth. I sense it. Absolutely. Brian Freeman is telling the truth. He represents Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, Hunter Biden, or at least at some point also you can look into his past with the allegations, you know, horrible. And by the way, people shouldn't be judged for their past. But a gang rape that took place at a college, which I know was settled out of court the night before was supposed to happen. So this is it. May explain why he represents both sides of the MeToo, which I'll get to a lot. He is known as someone who can destroy somebody's character in the court of public opinion or rehabilitate just a gun for hire. But all that kind of makes his intro yesterday Tucker's make more sense. Thank you for doing this, Carlson. I haven't seen you in 11 years though I've talked about you as you know, in the meantime. And then I wake up one morning and you're doing Candace Owens. I love Candace. I do too. She's married. Yeah. I love Brian Friedman, my lawyer. I love Brian Friedman, my lawyer too. And we both love Candace, who loves Brian Friedman, our lawyer. Yeah, we also love Megyn Kelly, who's very close with our lawyer, Brian Veen. Representative. Yeah, yeah, we all love each other. No pattern here as to appearances or rehabilitation. And again, this is just someone who could be representing all these people. Very effective, very effective representative at rehabilitating someone's image and maybe in some cases rightfully so. But it doesn't mean that this is done for the betterment of the country. So let me give you a pattern with Brian Friedman who represents both these people. He was the one who represented, like I said, Trevor Bauer's false accuser ruined his major league career. He also has defended the accused to curry favor their Kevin Spacey, Diplova and Diesel. He represented FKA Twigs as a survivor suing Shia LaBeouf. And then the Justin Baldoni situation, which has been covered a lot by Candace and Megyn Kelly. So Brian Friedman represented a client suing Justin Baldoni, then switched sides and took Baldoni on as a client, calling him exceedingly honorable while the prior client's estate later sued Friedman for malpractice. So that's a very important connection. So there's already the important connection of Hunter and Tucker. Close enough that he believed Hunter could get his child into Georgetown. No elitism here. Close enough that they communicated quite a bit And Tucker wanted to keep it quiet. And then there are the other connections of the same lawyer to Tucker, Kelly, Hunter Biden, many others in this case, people who are, I don't know if connected to Candace, but praising. It's just. It's bizarre. Here's why this matters, though. Just asking questions, but this is not a question. The Hunter Biden laptop story being claimed as Russian disinformation. And there was big tech collusion, censorship therein, right? We saw the results. There was the MRC poll and then there was an entire book written on it that 17% of Biden voters would not have voted for him if they knew that the laptop was a legitimate story, if they knew that it was real. Which, by the way, they're not even disputing here. They're just saying it wasn't all that bad. Bad. We don't have a clear exam, and I've been here since 2006, 2008, fighting against media leftism, right? The media entertainment, big tech, educational, industrial complex. We don't have a more clear example. It's not that it's the most important one than the Hunter Biden laptop story. It got to investigative journalists, grassroots who circulated, and right away, three letter agencies said, russian disinformation. And big tech said, say no more. We're going to ban this story that would affect the outcome of the election. Before you get the voter ID or any type of fraud, we're going to ban it just based on that word. And legacy media. It's the clearest example we have of leftist censorship and silencing voices of dissent, and it's the clearest example we have that an election was stolen. Throw it all out. Was the Jews, Israel. There's no reason to fear the left. There's no reason because we don't have any proof of leftist censorship or leftist control of big tech or intelligence agencies. Charlie Kirk, this other conspiracy here. Now, on one case, you had a very brief moment of unity. And as someone who lived through it and had to beef up security myself, it obviously was the quickest explanation. A radicalized trans activist, lgbtq, a ip, spending times in the dark recesses of the Internet with other leftists who justify radicalized behavior, went out and assassinated one of the most prominent voices of our movement in broad daylight. Well, that didn't happen. It was the Jews. We don't need to be afraid of LGBTQ radicalization. We don't need to be afraid of leftist indoctrination and unstable youth and mental illness. It's actually not an issue. It's the Jews. The two most concrete examples that you have of the consequences from the radical Marxist left of our lifetime, they're not the most important examples. They're the most concrete. They are the most provable. And you're going to see it with Tyler Robinson in a court of law, despite what the Internet sleuth say Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson have wanted to throw out say there's no threat, so there's no threat from the left. So vote for whoever. Vote for whoever. There's no difference. Probably a psyop too, that 10 to 20 million illegals came here. No, wait, that would be the Jews as well, not Democrats, probably, you know, Black Lives Matter, Summer of Love and Covid, not who and not China, Probably Israel. So really, there's no need to fear. Hey, look, are you a conservative? Are you maga? Are you American? First, I want to let you know you have no proof. There is no reason to fear. Have any problem with the left. They've done nothing wrong. They've committed no violence, they've committed no censorship. You've just been lied to. It's actually Israel who's responsible for all of it. Enjoy those midterms. That brings us, by the way, to the the Kalsheet check in who's going to be running for the GOP presidential nomination in the next JD Vance right now is at 79%. Rubio at 60. Wow. MTG at 32, Tucker at 27. I'm surprised MTG is higher than Tucker. I am too, right now. That won't last very long. I don't think. We'll see. That's it. Sorry to get. But it's like, all right, who, hey, the left isn't violent. No, I think it's a really good point to make right now. It's kind of sucking all of the oxygen out of the room on every single possible story and win that we could have for this presidency. It's oh, it's the Jews. What about Israel? What about Israel? What about. It's just over and over and over again. What I want America first people to understand is that you have shifted the cultural window massively on Israel. Everybody's talking about Israeli influence in the government and not wanting it, wanting AIPAC to at the very least register under fara. That conversation wasn't happening just a couple of years ago. Instead of taking the win, they still say that President Trump is compromised and that Netanyahu really is in charge and Israel still runs everything here. And Hunter Biden was part of a smear campaign from Israel instead of blaming. And so is Tyler Robinson, by the way. The word words. They're gonna put an innocent man behind bars because of Israel. I think that they absolutely have vested interests, and I think that. Absolutely. But this idea that. This idea that there would be no one on the left who would of course, want to suppress and that they would have the ability. Abc, NBC, cnn, cbs, cnbc, New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, all of them. All of them. 9, 11 was the Jews. Remember that, that theory going around that Tucker Carlson did his thing on jfk was the Jews. Do you see a common pattern here of blaming Israel, blaming the Jews, even without any real evidence at all? Just trying to make some tangential claim so that we can't identify the real threats in this country. And again, we want no foreign influence in the United States. Really quickly, you said Ted Cruz. I said Ted Cruz. And Mike Huckabee, he was able to push back in the interviews with those guys and make sure that he got to the truth. And he was hardcore in those interviews. Somebody pointed out to me online, Darrell Cooper saying, oh, those guys are elected official. I'm like, now do Piers Morgan, where they argued with each other for two hours straight. Tucker has it in him. He chooses when to do it and when not to. And he chose not to. With Hunter Biden. Tons of lies. Tons of lies. I mean, he knows the exact population number of the people have Iran or how many Christians have Iran. But he goes, did you ever drop off a laptop? No, never. He could have just followed with up with, was this your signature? Yeah, I wrote crack instead. Yeah, good enough for me. He said, no signature. But why didn't your legal defense argue that this was just so, you know, this is. This was a coordinated, and I don't mean coordinated by a bunch of foreign governments. This was coordinated by someone saying, hey, you know what? Hunter Biden is kind of on a. On. He's on a mea culpa tour. He's on a comeback tour. This would be nice if you could help rehabilitate the image of an old friend. Sure. That's exactly what this is. This is not about getting to the truth. And if you believe that the Hunter Biden laptop story was a scam, that the left never colluded with big tech and the three letter agencies, then you know what? Then you're not. Then you're just. You're not on board with fighting the censorship of the left. You don't think it's a threat. There'll be no reason for you to watch anymore. If you just think that, hey, you know, we're all Americans, it's America versus Israel. As though there's no battle for the soul of this country with traditional conservatives and the left, and as though we didn't see that play out during COVID and during that election all across Big Tech, then, I don't know, check the references from today's show because I have no other way to even attempt to reach you. Yeah, one other quick thing. He gave cover to Big Tech, you said he's giving cover a lot right now to the left and to Russia. He covered his base with Big Tech. Did you know why? He said that the laptop was pulled off. He said it was the revenge porn policy that they have and that there was nudity in those photographs that were on his laptop. And that's why this story was killed on Facebook and Twitter. Not exactly. It was killed because it was declared Russian disinformation. But he's covering his bases for now. The left, apparently, Russia's not involved. Has Tucker been demonetized on YouTube? Has he been. Has he been banned from. Well, I've been banned from X at one point. Been banned from TikTok, banned from Facebook, demonetizing YouTube. Has Tucker faced any of that at any point? I haven't seen it. I haven't seen it. Isn't that a little weird? Because his same people go, hey, why are they. Why are they getting. By the way, didn't he also make trips to Israel and hasn't Candace, like, many times? I haven't and I won't, by the way. But, you know, I've been the same guy. Tucker really had no integrity then. Candace really had no integrity then. But trust them when they say they have integrity now. Hunter Biden's a good guy. Let's go on to the next part. Yeah, those again, the Marxists, Right. They say that President Trump betrayed you. President Trump has screwed up on quite a bit. He has not betrayed you. He's been doing the best that he can on domestic policy through. Especially when he has opposition from the entire left. I'm sorry, Israel and all of the Republicans who refuse to take action. You know, the entrenched leftist bureaucracy, the leftist act, activist judges, and then the feckless Republicans with no spying. Let's compare what he has done through Executive Order, which he gets no credit for, versus the opposition. I want to go through this. These are just the latest examples, but there's been a lot, and this has been overlooked quite a bit. This is when I say he's done more than any president in our lifetime. I mean, he has attempted to and he's used all of the avenues available to him. He's tried to get bills passed. Well, that's pretty tough to do. And when he can't, he's used executive orders. And I know that those can be undone. One, it's better than doing nothing. Let's go for. Let's go through the first one, the enhanced visa screening executive order. This actually mandated stricter visa screenings period across the board. And there I should say some of the questions have been noted to be impossible to answer. Where's my daughter? Where's my daughter? Yeah, I mean, I don't know how to answer that. Yeah, I don't know you, dude. I just, I want to go to school here at very least. Seems unprofessional. Okay, so let me give you some of the results here and then I'll show you the opposition and all the references links in the description as we do every single show. Please check out the sources. Call me anything where I'm wrong. Result number one. We just had a new report that foreign student visas are down significantly 2025 Indian student visas down 62%. Chinese student visas are down 34%. Indian students who aspire to study in the United States saw a deep decline in the visa during the admission season to US Universities. New data showed the drop was far steeper than the decline recorded among Chinese. Chinese students. Now according to an analysis by the U. S. Based center. Oh, this guy is struggling. Consulates issues just 22,149F1 student visas to Indian nationals between May and August 2025. It is down to 62% from the 58, 694. This guy was gonna be your doctor. And boom goes the dynamite. That is the way the cookie crumbled. I need to go poop in the ground. Here's the second result. We were doing like new sign offs. That was just. Here's result number two from Trump's enhanced screening for visas. 175,000 visas have been stripped for criminal activity. Just to be clear, like the ones that you see right there, they're listed above. So criminal activity with the enhanced visa screenings, they've also been so 175,000 new ones. So down 60, something percent Indian visas down 30, something% Chinese student visas and an additional 175,000 visas stripped due to criminal activity. Like wearing white after Labor Day. I don't even know what that is. Is it a popo? He's from a Chicago. He's a going now. Here's an executive order. Now, why executive order? Well, because there's resistance from, of course, the left. Activist judges have been preventing more of these revocations that you've seen. Example, there was one protecting foreigners, their visas from being revoked over anti American views. They're saying, you can't do that. You can't do it because you can't have a litmus test. So they find workarounds. These are leftist activist judges. And then you also see opposition from the right. There's really just no appetite to pass any meaningful immigration reform. So people blame Donald Trump, who's a bull in a china shop doing everything he can on immigration visas, deportations, when really we should look at a good portion of the Republican Party who aren't doing a whole lot. Let's go to number two, executive order. This is a big one, birthright citizenship. And I want you to keep in mind that there really hasn't been one president who's contested birthright citizenship since its ratification in 1866. Since then President Trump the first person to try and do anything about it. And I know you're gonna say, well, the Supreme Court. Yeah, despite the Supreme Court and their decision, he signed two additional executive orders last week specifically addressing things like birthright citizenship, birth tourism. He ordered agencies not to issue any documents recognizing U.S. citizenship to children of including foreign government staff, alien enemies or terrorists, people who got immigration status through fraud, people who came to the United States to give birth on the US Basically to give birth on US Soil. So these are workarounds because of the Supreme Court. And he signed two more executive orders. The results that we see right now, lawsuits, activist judges, incoming. But again, this is the only guy who even wants that fight. He's the only guy who wants the fight and he got a Supreme Court ruling. So really, if you want to say opposition, acb, huge mistake. But there is value in shifting the Overton window to this hasn't even been discussed until President Trump. It keeps it in the public eye. It normalizes people having objections to the interpretation of birthright citizenship. Just like it normalized people saying even on the left, we need to close the border. At one point in time, that was seen as racist. And the resistance, of course, is the entire left, all of these activist judges. And then on the right, Amy Coney Barrett, she just believes that every single invader their baby gets citizenship because something, something soil. That doesn't change the executive order. And even after the ruling, let me issue two more. Wait till I get a load of me he's going. He doesn't get credit because not everything is accomplished. Let me give you some other examples. Stricter H1B rules. That's number three. The executive order was September 2025th. He made a proclamation. H1B's $100,000 annual fee for H1B applicants outside of the United States. What do we see? We see them down unbelievably outside of the United States. Overseas H1B applications, they're down 87%. 87%. He can't do anything about the H1Bs already here. That would require. That would require an act of Congress. He can deal with new people coming in because it's an issue of national security. Boom. Executive order, 87% reduction. Where do you see the opposition? Of course you see it from leftist activist judges. You had a judge in June this year pause the $100,000 fee for H1BS. Go figure. A judge saying you can't charge for the H1B even though you already do charge, by the way. The whole point is that's not supposed to be cost free. But he said, you know what? If they're paying the best and the brightest and not just replacing American labor with cheaper people coming from a degree mill, it'd be okay for them to pay $100,000 a year. Judge said no. Doesn't change the executive order and its reduction of these by 87%. Let's go to another one. Number four, student loans. The executive order this June. Basically, the government is no longer going to provide loans for useless degrees. Gender studies, gone. Afro American masters. Pay for it yourself. Toilet historian. Toilet historian. Bye. Oh, now it's okay to blend stories. And that's a huge one, by the way. That cuts the head off the beast. Because say goodbye to a lot of the professors who are. They're not going to be brought on to be tenured in the future because you better be able to prove that the degrees have return on their investment. That's what this policy is tied to. We don't know the result yet because the policy really only started in July. But we're going to see it. And where do you see the resistance? Of course, from the left, 100%. The activist district court judge out there. Yeah, you have it there. From the ap, I forget the name. Issued some kind of injunction, pausing the policy, which, by the way, when people say he's addicted judges should not have this much power over our national government. No, let's look at another executive order. This is number five, title nine, gender school funding. It wasn't just that he declared there were only two genders and is the only president who is willing to do anything about that ever, by the way. And that was a major issue. But it actually specifically affects school funding. It federally defunded any gender ideology teaching K through 12 public schools. It defunded any universities permitting biological men in women's sports changed everything. What was the result? Whole schools and sports organizations like the ncaa, they had to backtrack on gender ideology. And now we have clear guidelines. That's why it's moved on to the pro at the wnba. Let him have it. Where do you see resistance on this? Where do you see the opposition? Of course, from the left. Lawsuit after lawsuit trying to pause a policy. In this case, Supreme Court rightfully ruled that he could do that because men are men and women are women. But just to be clear, it's important to go, what has he done? Okay, let's just look at the executive orders and let's look at the people saying stop, stop, stop, we don't want it. Because a lot of those people are making appearances on these shows. Tucker. Candace, right? The Hunter Bidens of the world. They're the people who oppose this. Let's look at another one. Energy. This is huge. Day one, Trump executive order on energy cut regulations to specifically allow American energy to flourish and allow more energy exploration. Right. Very different from pausing all federal leases that we saw with Joe Biden and canceling Keystone xl. Day one, canceling Keystone XL and pausing a lot of leases on federal. The result? Record oil and natural gas production for the first time, at least I believe in our lifetime or at least certainly decades. The United States is a net energy exporter. Hey, that's a big one. I know people say, yeah, but gas prices at ran okay. That doesn't undo these other things. This is the exact opposite of Hunter's dad making sure that we could not produce our own energy. And what happens when that's the case? Well, you're far more reliant on foreign sources of energy. How's that good for the American people? And of course the opposition was the left. All of these lawsuits challenging these grants, right. Everything tries to say he doesn't have the right to do that. It's bad for the environment. There's a turtle. Number seven, tariffs. The executive order, all the tariffs that you guys remember based on emergency powers. What was the result? We saw 240. Or sorry, was it 260 something billion dollars? There you go, bring it up. 260 something billion dollars collected in tariffs when Everyone said this wouldn't work. And we're going, oh, my gosh, this actually might work. Why? Because it was used as a bargaining tool to get other people, other nations to stop taking advantage of us. Where was the opposition facing Donald Trump fighting on behalf of the American people? Well, you saw this from the right, right, with the Supreme Court. You saw it struck down the tariff Executive order, six to three vote, and there was no effort by congressional Republicans to actually try and ratify the tariff. So you have the left opposing it, you have the right capitulating. But isn't it important to draw the distinction between the guy who signed the executive order and those on the right, those Republicans who did nothing to assist it? Here's one of the most important ones. Let's go to Executive order number eight again. Check all the references on voting. The executive order, March 2026, ensuring that voting is exclusively for American citizens. So what happened? The result? Well, the DOJ sued 29 states and D.C. to produce voter roll data, and they ended up cleaning up their voting rolls. Okay, but where did you see the resistance? This is about what President Trump can do. There's not much that can be done through executive order. But you know that he's told them to pass the SAVE Act. Well, people on the right don't want to pass the SAVE act. And of course, of course no one on the left. So, yes, Thune sucks. But I also don't want to simply focus on the Republicans because you have the entire left saying that mere voter ID is racist and discriminatory. And then you have some people on the right going, well, we just don't want to, you know, we just don't want to waste time on this. Fight evil. The left, they want to steal elections from you, just as they did in 2020, you know, with the media, big tech collusion. Hunter Biden laughed. I'm sorry, Israel. And then people on the right who have no spine. That doesn't change the executive Order. The executive orders on visa overstays, on more stringent screening for visas, on H1B visas, on tariffs on our energy production, on voter ID, on the federal government no longer providing loans to useless degrees. So indoctrination factories can continue to thrive and inflate their exorbitant prices. It doesn't change the fact that he has done something no one else has. That's the big thing that, like, I think Donald Trump is very often a prick, and I get really tired of him doing, you know, what he's talking about, the reflecting pool and stuff. Like just let it go and move on. I get it. But on the issues that we said were the most important issues in the last election. Immigration, the border, big tech, collusion, censorship, free speech, election integrity. He's the only president, this is the only administration that's even tried to do anything at all. And people act like he's. He's the most dissatisfactory president ever. Okay, well, if he's the only president, like for example, birthright citizenship, late 1800s, if he's the only president to ever even suggest challenging it, that includes, by the way, going back, Reagan, Nixon, go through it, George W. Bush. What alternative do you think you end up with? Most likely scenario, you end up with a Kamala Harris or Gavin Newsom or you end up with any of the other Republicans who've done nothing. Ever. We can be dissatisfied and we can be disappointed. Yes. We can't be dishonest and we can't be uneducated and ignorant because we all have a responsibility to make a case to other people out there that the United States is a country worth defending. How do we do it? As a conservative, you know the answer. But if you're so busy fighting imperfections on the right, when this is the most effective administration that we've seen in our lifetime, on the issues that we all said mattered, then we have no hope of a future. And hey, might as well hand it over to the Hunter Bidens of the world because you know, he's champing at the bit and he's ready for a cabinet position that he'll probably smoke in a newsome presidency. If you are not yet a of member, remember, Click right there. We're gonna take your chat and discuss this more rub. Rumble Premium is Mud Club. Mud Club is Rumble Premium. We. We don't have any other way of keeping the lights on. It's your support. And if not, hey, you continue watching Haley Cronia, you'll watch it for free. And we'll see you tomorrow at 11 because that's when we do the show. On with the show. Just play something. It.