Trump Lays Down the Law on Ukraine & Russia: Take the Deal or We Walk

Summary

Podcast Summary: Louder with Crowder – "Trump Lays Down the Law on Ukraine & Russia: Take the Deal or We Walk"

Release Date: April 24, 2025
Host: Steven Crowder
Guests: Gerald Morgan, Josh Firestein, Bill Richmond

---

Introduction

In this episode of "Louder with Crowder," host Steven Crowder delves into significant geopolitical and domestic issues, focusing primarily on President Donald Trump's proposed peace plan for the Ukraine-Russia conflict, the United Kingdom's controversial climate change initiatives, media credibility concerns, and a pivotal Supreme Court case regarding gun carry permits for young adults. The discussion is enriched with insights from guests Gerald Morgan and Josh Firestein, as well as legal perspectives from Bill Richmond.

---

1. President Trump's Peace Plan for Ukraine and Russia

Crowder initiates the conversation by unpacking Trump's Peace Plan, positioning it as a straightforward yet effective solution to the prolonged Ukraine-Russia war. The host emphasizes the plan's aim to extricate the United States from the embroiled conflict, advocating for direct negotiations between Ukraine and Russia without American mediation.

Key Points Discussed:

• Ceasefire and Territorial Freeze: The plan calls for an immediate ceasefire and a freeze of current territorial lines. Crowder highlights the proposal's simplicity, suggesting that both nations hash out their differences directly.

• NATO Membership: A critical aspect of the plan is the stipulation that Ukraine cannot join NATO, addressing Russia’s longstanding red line regarding NATO expansion.

• Mineral Rights and Economic Cooperation: Ukraine would sign a mineral rights agreement with the U.S., granting America a security interest in these resources. Additionally, the plan proposes lifting sanctions and fostering economic cooperation between the U.S. and Russia.

Notable Quotes:

• Steven Crowder [22:10]: "President Trump counted to three. That's the deal that we're looking at right now. He counted to three, and he's decided. All right, this is final offer for the Russia Ukraine deal."

• Crowder [24:26]: "We will not give up any land. Wanna bet? Yeah."

Guest Insights:

• Gerald Morgan: Emphasizes the futility of continued U.S. involvement, stating, "Russia cannot take Ukraine if they didn't get any more aid from us. They go alone."

• Josh Firestein: Points out the emotional toll, saying, "5,000 soldiers are being killed every week. You would have never had that war if I were president."

Conclusion: The trio largely agrees that Trump's plan, while not perfect, offers a viable pathway to end the conflict by reducing U.S. entanglement and encouraging direct negotiation between the warring parties.

---

2. The United Kingdom’s Climate Change Policy: Block the Sun

Shifting focus to environmental policies, Crowder criticizes the UK's strategy to combat climate change by blocking sunlight through aerosol injections into clouds. He denounces the plan as illogical and counterproductive, especially given the UK's simultaneous massive investments in solar energy.

Key Points Discussed:

• Solar Power Expansion vs. Sun Blocking: Crowder highlights a paradox where the UK is increasing its solar capacity by 18,000% while simultaneously attempting to block sunlight. This inconsistency undermines the effectiveness of the climate strategy.

• Environmental and Practical Concerns: The plan is criticized for its potential ineffectiveness and negative repercussions, including acid rain and disruption of natural ecosystems.

Notable Quotes:

• Steven Crowder [09:50]: "They have experiments to dim the sun and that's going to be green lit in the next few weeks and that includes injecting aerosol into clouds to make them more reflective. Are you taking the fucking piss?"

• Crowder [11:04]: "I need SPF."

Guest Insights:

• Gerald Morgan: Sarcastically remarks, "They run out of feet. What are you talking about."

• Josh Firestein: Adds humor with, "Maybe they can launch all the Priuses towards the sun."

Conclusion: The hosts contend that the UK's climate initiatives are contradictory and lack practical viability, questioning the logic behind such drastic measures.

---

3. Media Credibility: Exposing Clarissa Ward’s False Reporting

Crowder transitions to media integrity by scrutinizing CNN journalist Clarissa Ward's reporting. He accuses her of fabricating stories, undermining trust in mainstream media.

Key Points Discussed:

• False Reporting on Syrian Rebel: Ward’s exaggerated story about finding a starving Syrian rebel is labeled as “bull crap,” with Crowder arguing that the lack of consequences for such misinformation is alarming.

• Impact on Public Trust: By portraying Ward as a "compulsive liar," Crowder emphasizes the detrimental effects of misleading journalism on public perception and discourse.

Notable Quotes:

• Steven Crowder [17:05]: "We found out two, three body count. Hey, I live these sheep with smiles on their faces. Now, why are you rushing? I don't know."

• Crowder [19:14]: "We found out not long after that it was completely false. But let's go back so you can see that we didn't buy it then."

Guest Insights:

• Josh Firestein: Criticizes Ward's credibility with, "This lady is so forgettable. CNN forgot that they even hired her before."

• Gerald Morgan: Agrees, stating, "They're like, she pitched this story about running around with Tom Hanks to find the antimatter in, you know, the Vatican."

Conclusion: The segment underscores the hosts' skepticism towards mainstream media, advocating for skepticism and independent verification of news stories.

---

4. Supreme Court Case: Gun Carry Permits for 18-20 Year Olds

In the final segment, Crowder and his guests discuss a significant Supreme Court decision affecting gun rights for young adults. The court declined to review an appeals court ruling that struck down Minnesota's ban on gun carry permits for individuals aged 18 to 20.

Key Points Discussed:

• Case Overview: The Supreme Court's refusal to reinstate the ban effectively allows 18 to 20-year-olds in Minnesota to obtain public carry permits, challenging state-level restrictions based on age.

• Second Amendment Implications: Bill Richmond explains the constitutional angles, highlighting the debate over what defines an adult worthy of Second Amendment rights.

• Statistical Misrepresentation: Crowder critiques how the state of Minnesota used misleading statistics to justify the age-based ban, arguing that concealed carry holders have significantly lower crime rates compared to the general population and even police officers.

Notable Quotes:

• Bill Richmond [52:36]: "The law since 2003 in Minnesota and every state's a little bit different, said that you could not. Right. So even though you could legally possess one, you could not be carrying it in public."

• Steven Crowder [56:00]: "Concealed carry permit holders, they are the most law abiding demographic that you can, if you were to take them, isolate them, group of Americans, they literally have lower crime rates than police officers. Off duty police officers. It's not even close."

Guest Insights:

• Bill Richmond: Provides legal clarity, stating, "The appellate court ruled in favor of the kids and said, you are not actually kids. You were adults in the historical context."

• Gerald Morgan: Expresses support for the ruling with, "Yep, go for it. Hold on, hold on."

• Josh Firestein: Discusses potential outcomes, noting, "They could have gotten something very, very close."

Conclusion: The hosts view the Supreme Court's decision as a victory for Second Amendment rights, arguing that age-based restrictions are unconstitutional and based on flawed statistical reasoning.

---

Final Thoughts

Throughout the episode, Steven Crowder maintains a critical stance towards government intervention, mainstream media, and restrictive gun laws, advocating for personal freedoms and skepticism of institutional narratives. The discussions are interspersed with humor and sharp commentary, providing listeners with a blend of political analysis and entertainment.

Additional Highlights:

• Humorous Interludes: The podcast includes light-hearted moments, such as impersonations and comedic exchanges, adding levity to the heavy topics discussed.

• Calls to Action: Crowder frequently encourages listeners to join Rumble Premium for an ad-free experience and access to additional content, integrating promotional segments seamlessly into the discussion.

Notable Quotes Wrap-Up:

• Crowder [45:40]: "You would have never had that war if I were president, I guarantee you that."
• Crowder [58:19]: "Some guy cliff diving, shooting a mag, shooting a dead eagle."

---

Conclusion: This episode of "Louder with Crowder" offers a comprehensive and engaging analysis of pressing geopolitical issues, media scrutiny, and constitutional debates, delivered with Crowder's signature blend of wit and assertiveness. Whether you're following the Ukraine-Russia conflict, concerned about environmental policies, or interested in the latest Supreme Court decisions on gun rights, this episode provides valuable insights and thought-provoking commentary.

---

References:

• For the full episode and additional content, visit Louder with Crowder's website or watch the video version on Rumble.

Transcript

[Steven Crowder]

Welcome to the lineup. Welcome, Bongino Army. Of course, Vince. Viewers, we appreciate live every day here on Rumble. We appreciate that you could choose to tune in anywhere, but you don't because most places are crap. After us is Tim Poole and you're gonna have Russell Brand, Jeremy, at the quartering. You don't need to change your digital channel. You're gonna hear a lot of rain going on today because there's a serious storm. The office across the street from us is now officially destroyed. And you're also going to hear some noises from my stomach because I am not. Well, that's not fair to do when I don't have my headphones on so I can't hear what's happening with the soundboard. I just heard everybody start laughing here. But I'm here. I am here, but I am not. I can't tell you that I feel 100% at all. So we have a lot to get to today. The new deal, the talks, the multi point deal from President Trump and Ukraine, the peace plan, it needs to be explained. It seems to be pretty convoluted out there. It's actually a pretty damn good thing if you break it down. We're going to get into that. It also removes the United States from having to play matchmaker. Settle down, you two. We're gonna talk about, I don't know if you know this, Britain, they're trying to solve climate change and they're blotting out the sun. Now, I know you're thinking, didn't Mr. Burns try that? Yes, the Brits are just that stupid. And my lawyer is here with a Supreme Court case on the right to carry. It's going to be hardly legal with Bill Richmond. So my question to you first is, what do you, what do you think of Donald Trump's peace plan? Do you know about it? The Ukraine, Russia peace plan. What should we do if they refuse? I know the answer is nukem. It's live, 11am Eastern. Let's get to the show. Welcome to the Crowder show. We'll make you smile. Stories, jokes that share your view. Laughing all the while with a bold.

[Gerald Morgan]

Right wing crew broken up in YouTube.

[Steven Crowder]

America, America is just for you. Sketches, clips and jokes galora never gets old. Every day on Rumble Live.

[Josh Firestein]

Go premium for more with a brash offensive group.

[Steven Crowder]

You can't even blame the Jews. America, not India, it's filled with poo. America, not India, it's filled with poo. Click Rumble Premium and join now for 99 annually or 9.99amonth. To get the entirely ad free experience and an ever expanding roster of content creators and free speech. I have to sip slowly as to not upset the internals.

[Gerald Morgan]

Sorry.

[Josh Firestein]

You got there Pepto Bismol.

[Steven Crowder]

I did. I got a lot of Pepto Bismol going. Glad to be with you. Of course, it's 11am Eastern on a weekday, so we. We are. Here. We are. Oh, I thought something broke. I'm. Seriously, my lips are like sandpaper. Captain Morgan, CEO number two. How are you?

[Gerald Morgan]

Better than you, buddy.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, it's okay. I think it's just a 24 hour bug or food poisoning.

[Gerald Morgan]

It's Fu Manchu. It's made you sick.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, I don't. Are you supposed to cook pork? I did it like sashimi. You can do that. Friday, Saturday, June 20th and 21st, he's going to be at the Helium Comedy Club in Indianapolis, Indiana. Mr. Josh Firestein. How are you, sir?

[Josh Firestein]

I'm all right. I'm all right.

[Steven Crowder]

Good. Yeah. Well, all right.

[Gerald Morgan]

Another Indianapolis that you had to say Indiana, maybe.

[Josh Firestein]

Maybe there's one in India. Maybe there's an Indianapolis.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, maybe there's like they have like 95 languages. I'm sure there's something that sounds like Indianapolis.

[Gerald Morgan]

I feel like it's picking on you right now, but you're like John Wick at the end of the last movie. He's kind of defeated and dead. Yeah, it's like, whatever.

[Steven Crowder]

Plus you killed my puppy. Which I was like, why would you do that, Gerald?

[Gerald Morgan]

I didn't.

[Steven Crowder]

You did. He did.

[Gerald Morgan]

You're back.

[Steven Crowder]

I guess.

[Gerald Morgan]

All right.

[Steven Crowder]

You know who else isn't doing well? Remember this broad, Nina Jankowicz? I know you're saying, hey, who's that? The name sounds familiar. And I'm quite certain I don't like her. Well, good. She was the head for like two weeks of Biden's disinformation Governance board. Remember that? The Ministry of Misinformation is what it was coined because it was that silly. Well, remember, she left. And when that was happening, we were saying, this is a totalitarian, this is a fascist, this is a Marxist who wants to silence voices of dissent. And of course, we were accused of being conspiracy theorists. Well, now that she is unfettered, she's unchanged. She is not a part of the American government. She's decided to go on her tour and she's now, I don't have a clip in front of the EU with I guess, an ominous warning. You're not going to like it. Before I describe the details of Russia's recent Online influence campaigns. I would like to call upon you to stand firm against another autocracy, the United States of America. Oh, that's treason. The Trump administration is undoubtedly preparing a pressure campaign destroyer institutions to roll back regulation like the DSA to end support for Ukraine to stop holding Russia to account. Do not capitulate. Hold the line. Doing so is the clearest signal the European Union could send to Russia and other adversaries that it will not stop fighting to preserve democracy at home and around the world. So everything about this is treasonous. And you know what the punishment is for treason. Here's the point I want to at least draw your attention to. She was installed into government by Joe Biden, and this lady is advocating a foreign collective of nations, the eu, to act as enemies of the United States, the country she was appointed to serve. At what point does it count as treason? Can you guys let me know? And really, her problem is freedom of speech. So it's anti First Amendment, it's anti United States by her own words. And she's asking for foreign nations to act against the United States. Yeah, I don't know if there's a rope long enough. Figuratively. Maybe not. And by the way, what bothered me most about that clip. Who has frosted tips in 2025?

[Josh Firestein]

Every morning, there's a halo hanging from.

[Steven Crowder]

The corner of my girlfriend's ballpark. You're not in, Radiohead guy.

[Gerald Morgan]

Was that Dane Cook, the fall from grace? Give him the shocker, Dane.

[Josh Firestein]

There are plenty of arrogant comedians with frosted tips these days, too.

[Steven Crowder]

Yes. Yes, there are. I was gonna do a Dan Cook impression, but I don't have the energy. Maybe later you could do a good one. No, I don't want to do that. Not right now.

[Gerald Morgan]

Not right now?

[Steven Crowder]

No, because it requires too much velocity. From my gut right now, all of my sound, all of my breathing is in my chest, and everything below it is like this.

[Josh Firestein]

Oh, he did have that prolific bit about an itchy asshole.

[Gerald Morgan]

He did.

[Josh Firestein]

You could do that.

[Steven Crowder]

He also that prolific bit about misinformation. Look, I know that what happens is when I go. And so I take the misinformation. I take it, I put it in my mouth. Ooh.

[Gerald Morgan]

Ooh.

[Steven Crowder]

I hate misinformation.

[Gerald Morgan]

When you replay this, that's where you cracked your pants.

[Josh Firestein]

When the headphone came off.

[Steven Crowder]

All right, speaking. Waddle out of the room.

[Josh Firestein]

Excuse me.

[Steven Crowder]

Speaking of crapping the bed, the UK Government has now just decided to implement. Here's how you know it's a religion, okay? And a dumb one. You know, like Scientology. Yeah. Or I don't know, most of the Eastern religions. It's completely nonsensical and it's ever changing where there seems to be no type of moral or even logical through line. That's what neo environmentalism is, that's what climate alarmism is. And the UK is right at the forefront with the dumbest idea yet to fix climate change. It's time for climate claims.

[Gerald Morgan]

It's a good stinger.

[Steven Crowder]

So there've been a lot of stupid plans, right? You guys are going to like, okay, well what could top, you know, carbon offsets or the Segway, you know, that.

[Josh Firestein]

Was a climate thing.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, they were like, ah, it's gonna be the transportation of the future, you know, or tucking your pant leg into your sock so you can ride your fixed bicycle to work. Right. All really dumb, dumb plans. Right. Eating plant based meat alternatives, Eating bugs. There've been a lot of stupid plans. The Paris Agreement, the Kyoto Protocol, where you expect expect China and India to get on board. The point is none of it makes sense even if you accept the premise. Okay, but now the UK said hold their bidder because they're going to try and block out the sun. According to the Telegraph.

[Josh Firestein]

Sorry, I thought.

[Steven Crowder]

That's okay. According to the Telegraph. No, I just want to let that ride.

[Gerald Morgan]

Admonish.

[Steven Crowder]

They have experiments to dim the sun and that's going to be green lit in the next few weeks and that includes injecting aerosol into clouds to make them more reflective. Are you taking the fucking piss? I'm not. So the plan for the UK and we'll get to why this won't work is hey, we need to fix climate change. We're going to block sunlight and it was initiated by their newest member of Parliament.

[Gerald Morgan]

There you go, the aforementioned. Now I get it.

[Steven Crowder]

Here's the problem. It would be a stupid thing. Let's say even if they did it in, I don't know, Barbados or Bermuda, it still wouldn't work. But it makes even less sense when you take into account that the UK is the fifth cloudiest country in the world. What's our biggest problem? I believe there's too much sunlight. Let's get rid of. This is just a pure news. The UK getting rid of the sun, that's like Africa importing more aids. So this is. There's. Well, I guess we all have to say goodbye to those golden God sun kissed Brits. So I feel a little pasty.

[Gerald Morgan]

Does vitamin D help teeth?

[Josh Firestein]

Yes, I need SPF 4000.

[Steven Crowder]

Yes, that's right.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yes, yes.

[Steven Crowder]

I need SPF.

[Gerald Morgan]

Top sun is bad on syphilis.

[Steven Crowder]

And here's the other crazy thing again, all references available so you can do this research yourself. The uk, okay. They want to block out the sun to solve climate change. All right, but how do you juxtapose that with the fact that they are increasingly relying on solar power? Again, in the name of environmentalism. From 2010 to 2024, they've had an 18,000% increase in solar power capacity in the UK. We need to power our cities with the sun. After we block it. They don't have any guns to shoot themselves in the foot.

[Gerald Morgan]

They run out of feet. What are you talking.

[Steven Crowder]

In the summer. This is just last summer. The UK government, they pledged to quadruple solar investment. Did no one have a meeting? Oh, wait, were you doing the whole.

[Josh Firestein]

Harness to sun thing? I was gonna do the whole. Block it.

[Steven Crowder]

I propose we block the sun. You'd think the other person, like. Wait, what? What about my $8.7 billion increasing the sun capacity?

[Gerald Morgan]

Lord.

[Steven Crowder]

Solar power? I thought we were all pro solar. We're anti solar. Well, it was their ex girlfriend who proposed it.

[Josh Firestein]

They're going to have. They're going to have shutters on the country that are powered by the sun.

[Steven Crowder]

To block the sun.

[Josh Firestein]

We're going to block it with solar panels. It makes sense, Stephen, I promise.

[Gerald Morgan]

It's a disgruntled employee.

[Steven Crowder]

I'll show you. They're going to put a UV screen like you have on your door over the entire top of your satin tooth. Close the screen, you're letting the space flies in.

[Josh Firestein]

It's all made of unrecyclable plastic.

[Steven Crowder]

Yes, and it gets worse.

[Josh Firestein]

Okay, so right now, Great Britain Brexiting themselves from the sun. Fantastic.

[Steven Crowder]

The sun has lived high on the hog for far too long. It's time to take it down a peg. Speaking of which, I rather enjoy that now.

[Gerald Morgan]

Oh, wow. Right. Practical. It'd be practical.

[Steven Crowder]

So an 18,000% increase in solar power capacity, an $8.7 billion pledge to increase against solar capacity over the next five years, and just three weeks ago, a $260 million investment in solar power for schools and hospitals. Wait, wait, wait, wait. We're going to block out? Has anyone taken into consideration the patients with cancer?

[Josh Firestein]

It's like investing in lung cancer research and cigarettes. Yes. I'll win either way. It's just.

[Steven Crowder]

By the way, there are also, in case you've forgotten, the uk, they were caught faking climate data to show temperature increases. Okay, Faking It. And keep in mind, by the way, I will say this, at least now they're acknowledging what a lot of climate skeptics they've called us climate skeptics have known for a long time that humans, man made carbon emissions in this on our planet, it ranges anywhere. The total contribution to carbon anywhere from 1% to 9%. The other 91% comes from natural process like the ocean, the sun, the interaction between. We've been talking about this for a long time. So now they seem to be on board with. Oh, driving a Prius doesn't help. So let's block out the sun.

[Josh Firestein]

Maybe they can launch all the Priuses towards the sun.

[Steven Crowder]

If Brits needed any help looking like trolls.

[Gerald Morgan]

It's just, it's going to make it work.

[Steven Crowder]

So, so, so hold on, let's do the, the math on this. The UK is trying to stop climate change by blocking out the sun, but the country is spending billions invest in solar. They're retarded. Right. They're just. It's a nation of. Yes, they're all inbred. Yep.

[Gerald Morgan]

For too long. For far too long.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, that's pretty much it.

[Gerald Morgan]

This is the stupidest idea, by the way. You know how they figured out that the clouds would be more reflective if they just put these little parts? Shipping pollution from ships.

[Steven Crowder]

Yes. Yeah, that's a good idea. Let's harness that pollution. Yes.

[Gerald Morgan]

And do some more.

[Steven Crowder]

I say we've been going about this all wrong. We've been trying to decrease pollution. It precisely is the opposite. Everyone stop throwing your shit out the window.

[Josh Firestein]

What we should do is pollute the clouds and then it will rain acid on our faces.

[Steven Crowder]

Better.

[Gerald Morgan]

Oh, Britain.

[Steven Crowder]

Do you have any idea how confused people will be 300 years when they look upon the rubble of that civilization and try and carbon date the bodies?

[Bill Richmond]

There's no way.

[Steven Crowder]

Melted with acid rain, just pigmentless.

[Gerald Morgan]

How did they do this? Well, solar and blocking the sun.

[Steven Crowder]

Yes, yes. Well, you know what? Looking back, looking back, I do understand your point. We probably should have picked a lane, by the way. Download. If you're watching on download the app, follow us. That's the best way to stay in touch. You will be notified when we are live. You don't have to worry about algorithms like you do with YouTube. Download the app, follow us. You can watch live anywhere and you can watch this lineup. It just continues from show to show. Let's go on to the next. This is really just a show in idiocy, which I'm glad we get to do today because you know I'm not at 100%. It felt if it's. Do you remember this broad? Clarissa Ward?

[Josh Firestein]

No.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yes.

[Steven Crowder]

Thank you. He's a good foil. So if you fabricated, like, if you. Let me ask you this. If you completely fabricated, let's say, where you work, some kind of a report, I don't know, maybe an Excel sheet. But if. Or you just made up something at work that misled all of the employees, or if you made up something that was used to mislead millions of people. No. You'd expect to face repercussions like likely being fired.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yes.

[Steven Crowder]

Well, I don't know if you remember this when it happened. Clarissa Ward, right? She was out there. She did this story where she found this Syrian rebel, right? She found the Syrian rebel who was starving and in prison, and she was the only person who found this guy. And she had an exclusive scoop. Now, as it was happening, we were joking about how there's no way this was true. Spoiler alert. We found out not long after that it was completely false. But let's go back so you can see that we didn't buy it then. So CNN released this really weird video. A lot of people think this is fake, and by that, I mean it's allegedly fake, and by that, I mean it's clearly fake. Clarissa Ward just happened to discover a prisoner of the Assad regime. So watch this and tell me if it feels a little professional wrestling. Is someone there? Pause. They're already in the cell. They're already in. Olly olly oxen free. That is a perfectly trimmed beard right there.

[Gerald Morgan]

It's not. I've been in here for three months without care.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, just think about, by the way, when they're in there. There's a camera. They already blew off the lock with gunfire, and they're in there.

[Gerald Morgan]

I don't think it actually happened.

[Steven Crowder]

You don't tell them they're in there with a. With a boom mic, with a line. With a line producer, and he's just like, no, I'm just counting sheep. I use the term counting loosely. We found out two, three, body count. Hey, I live these sheep with smiles on their faces. Now, why are you rushing? I don't know.

[Josh Firestein]

The sheep called me a bad boy.

[Gerald Morgan]

It's terrible.

[Steven Crowder]

So one week after that broadcast turned out, the story was completely. Completely bull crap turned out. And you would think consequences. Well, no, actually. Now Clarissa Ward is back in action, this time reporting on the Pope's death at the Vatican. She's gotten the rights to that, where we can assume that she has the early scoop on who the cardinals plan to elect pope. That's all we have for that story, in case you're wondering.

[Josh Firestein]

Last pope, indeed.

[Steven Crowder]

I just want to remind you that everything is a lie on legacy media, and you should trust none of it's when people now are like, oh, we need authorities and experts. I get it. Clickbait is a problem. That's a worse problem. Cnn, it's a worse problem. Abc, NBC, cbs, cnn, msnbc. Because once upon a time, you couldn't refute them with the truth. So remember, when you think Clarissa Ward, think compulsive liar who still has a job. Which brings me to my question. What do you want to see Clarissa Ward cover next?

[Josh Firestein]

Her face, I think. But I think.

[Steven Crowder]

I think that was.

[Josh Firestein]

It wasn't even the first time that she'd been caught lying. I believe when we covered the story the first time in December that we had. We had talked about another story that she previously lied about.

[Steven Crowder]

What's that?

[Gerald Morgan]

Geraldine Israel. She was. She was saying that they were shelling, and she got down in the ditch and like, oh, my gosh, they're firing. And it was, like, miles away.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah.

[Josh Firestein]

This lady is so forgettable. CNN forgot that they even hired her before.

[Steven Crowder]

They're like, she pitched this story about.

[Gerald Morgan]

Running around with Tom Hanks to find the antimatter in, you know, the Vatican.

[Steven Crowder]

So, yes. With his crappy ponytail or whatever it was. This is, by the way she's posed. Look at this. Michelangelo. I'm touching God.

[Josh Firestein]

Should I have my arm out or.

[Steven Crowder]

Should I have it?

[Josh Firestein]

Put it out, put it out. Stop smiling so much.

[Gerald Morgan]

It's like the weatherman that goes out there in the hurricane is like. And the winds are blowing and there's two people walking calm.

[Steven Crowder]

I know, I know. I barely made it out alive.

[Josh Firestein]

Meanwhile, the cameraman's in cargo shorts and a T shirt.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah.

[Steven Crowder]

Eating a slim Jim. Whatever.

[Josh Firestein]

Clarissa.

[Steven Crowder]

Clarissa lies about it all. So, and I will say this. We have an admonish button here, right? We make the references publicly available. We were talking yesterday about transparency. Like, we've gotten things wrong. Like, may I confuse the Greenland shark and the sixgill shark. And I rightfully was raked over the coals. That is very different from staging, lying about releasing and defending a false story of a Syrian rebel as an exclusive scoop. Do you guys see? That one is actually, like, people get things wrong. That happens every single one. If you're watching, you've gotten something wrong. Of course it happens. And the best you can do is try and apologize for it and try and do better the next time and have a winning record as it relates to being right. These people have no sense. They have no sense of responsibility to the truth at all. It doesn't even factor in. All right, let's go on to President Trump and the Ukraine, Russia offer right now. Let me just sort of explain this to you because it's hard, and it's even hard for me. And, of course, laying the brain here has done a great job. It kind of started with the mineral rights deal yesterday as I was reading up on it, and I was delirious where I thought I was being chased by Canadian geese in my bed last night.

[Gerald Morgan]

What?

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, well, I'm dehydrated, so.

[Bill Richmond]

To sort.

[Steven Crowder]

Of put this in a nutshell, President Trump counted to three. That's the deal that we're looking at right now. He counted to three, and he's decided. All right, this is final offer for the Russia Ukraine deal. You guys need to start hashing it out. Which brings us to insane in the Ukraine.

[Josh Firestein]

Insane of the Ukraine.

[Steven Crowder]

Insane of Ukraine. Insane at the Ukraine.

[Josh Firestein]

Insane.

[Steven Crowder]

I always get Ukraine fatigue. And then I see that stinger. I'm like, okay, I could go one more.

[Josh Firestein]

Because we didn't make that.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, no, we didn't.

[Gerald Morgan]

That was him.

[Josh Firestein]

We didn't do that.

[Gerald Morgan]

That was him.

[Steven Crowder]

So I know everyone is tired. This whole situation, the negotiations, turned into a quagmire. Right? Russia, Ukraine. It seems like we could be at the end of the road here because luckily we have sent the best man for the job on the ground in Kyiv. We spent nearly $200 billion to the defense of Ukraine. There are lots of questions about where the money is going. There's nothing to hide. We are absolutely open. Wouldn't ought to be possible by the United States where those dollars are going.

[Gerald Morgan]

We are kind of the living shield against Russia's invasion to the civilized world.

[Steven Crowder]

I want to get to Russia's intentions and possibilities of a ceasefire which prompted Putin to immediately launch all remaining missiles. Yeah. Oh, shit.

[Josh Firestein]

Did Zelensky say that he's a shield protecting us from Russia?

[Gerald Morgan]

Apparently. Apparently.

[Steven Crowder]

I hope Ben does a good job with. I just hope he, like. Did you just say your shield? That's retarded, sir.

[Gerald Morgan]

Like you're a human cheel.

[Steven Crowder]

You mean cannon fodder. Let's just see what happens. I'm curious to see what happens, but no one's a fan of this guy at this point, Zelensky. And it doesn't mean that you're a fan of Putin either. But Wednesday, and we'll get into the points of the deal, go through it point by point. Hopefully it helps you understand a little bit better. I actually think this is pretty good, kind of final offer. In my opinion, pretty reasonable. Donald Trump. Zelensky got into another blow up. This time over. And the problem with Zelenskyy is this guy's never consistent. He kind of does a handshake deal and changes it. This time there was another blow up over Crimea.

[Gerald Morgan]

Trump versus Zelensky, Round two.

[Steven Crowder]

President Trump accusing Ukrainian President Zelenskyy of, quote, inflammatory statements today in a lengthy social media post after Zelenskyy reiterated he.

[Gerald Morgan]

Would not concede any territory to Russia.

[Steven Crowder]

Including Crimea, which was annexed in. In 2014 during the Obama administration. Look, look, I don't like Putin. I don't like what Russia is doing. I don't like sending money to Ukraine. But I will tell you what I really, really, really, really don't like, is Zelinsky acting like he's in a position to be making demands on anything and.

[Josh Firestein]

Then blaming us for not being able to secure your peace deal.

[Steven Crowder]

We will not give up any land. Wanna bet? Yeah.

[Gerald Morgan]

It's a good thing. You don't wanna give that back. Russia didn't ask you.

[Steven Crowder]

No.

[Gerald Morgan]

They took it.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah.

[Gerald Morgan]

Why do we live in this fantasy world where anything belongs to anybody? It is yours if you can keep it. I hate that. That's the rule of the road. But it is. Our constitution is literally a piece of paper that is useless unless we can enforce it, unless we can defend it. That's it.

[Steven Crowder]

Yes, exactly.

[Gerald Morgan]

Stop with the games.

[Steven Crowder]

They start with the premise of it is ours. The US Will pay for us to keep it. Yes, you pay. You pay. By the way, we. You see. How about you demand nothing? Shut up and take it and like it and say, thank you, sir, please. Thank you. These are the words that we want to hear. Zelensky and I get it. Putin, not a good guy, bad guy. But you are just a prick.

[Gerald Morgan]

You're just a prick.

[Steven Crowder]

So President Trump wrote this on Truth Social. He wrote, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is boasting on the front page of the Wall Street Journal that Ukraine will not legally recognize the occupation of Crimea. There's nothing to talk about here. This statement is very harmful to the peace negotiations with Russia in that Crimea was lost years ago under the auspices of President Barack Hussein Obama. His middle name is Usain. It's Hussein. A lot of people didn't know that. They say, no, that's not his middle I say it is. It is not even a point of discussion. Nobody is asking Zelensky to recognize Crimea as Russian territory. But if he wants Crimea, why didn't they fight for it 11 years ago when it was handed over to Russia without a shot being fired? Its inflammatory statements like Zelenskyy's that makes it so difficult to settle this war. He has nothing to boast about. Nothing. I know some people think he has some things. Nothing. I have nothing to do with Russia. Because he knows what they're gonna say. But have much to do with wanting to save, on average, 5,000 Russian and Ukrainian soldiers a week who are dying for no reason whatsoever. I look forward to being able to help Ukraine and Russia get out of this complete and total mess that would have never started if I were president. And we'll get to the deal. Saying Ukraine will not legally recognize the occupation of Crimea does not make it true. Kind of like how Josh refuses to legally recognize the restraining order filed against him by Hooters. You can. It's still there.

[Josh Firestein]

I just go there for the mashed potatoes.

[Steven Crowder]

It's still a thing.

[Josh Firestein]

Open the door.

[Gerald Morgan]

What?

[Josh Firestein]

What was that?

[Steven Crowder]

I didn't even hear what he said. Was that me? Open the door. And so here's the thing, too. I will say this. I will say this in Putin's defense. I know right away people are gonna go nuts. I know Putin seems to be like him or hate him. Seems to be pretty clear about the terms. He'd been pretty consistent. You may not like the terms as far as what he expects with the lines where they are right now, what territory he expects, what he's willing to compromise on. Like he's been for everyone saying, you can't trust this guy at all. He's been more consistent. Not saying he has been entirely consistent. He's been more consistent on his terms in coming to the table than Zelensky. You remember the last blowup, right? Zelensky was minutes away from a deal that day until he decided to be. Again, I'm sorry for the language. A total prick. So last night, President Trump did say that he thought he was close to a deal at this point with at least Russia. I will say that I think Russia is ready. And a lot of people said Russia wanted to go for the whole thing. And they've. I think we have a deal with Russia. We have to get a deal with Zelensky. And I hope that Zelensky. I thought it might be easier to deal with Zelensky. So far, it's been harder. But that's okay, it's all right. But. But I think we have a deal with both. Okay, now before you say, oh, he's only praising Russia because he's a, he's a shill for Putin. He wrote this morning on Truth Social, he wrote, I am not happy with the Russian strikes on Kiev. Not necessary. Very bad timing. Vladimir, stop. 5,000 soldiers a week are dying. Let's get the peace deal done. So here's the thing. He is being consistent in saying you need to stop the dying and you need to stop the dying. You may not like where he lines up on territories, where he lines up on mineral rights, where he lines up on NATO. He has been remarkably consistent, can we all agree, in saying you need to stop the death as best you can. And so do you.

[Josh Firestein]

Since last year, since, I mean, I mean, even before last year, since two years ago, he's been saying the same thing, right? That the dying needs to stop. That's been his clear point.

[Steven Crowder]

Right.

[Gerald Morgan]

Because it's obvious there's not a military solution for Ukraine. Russia cannot take over Ukraine. We've seen that. Ukraine cannot get Russia to get out of their country. We've seen that.

[Josh Firestein]

No, and it sucks. The only way Ukraine wins is if the US lets our soldiers die.

[Gerald Morgan]

Exactly.

[Steven Crowder]

That's it. And I actually disagree with one statement you just make. Russia absolutely could take Ukraine if they didn't get any more aid from us. They go alone.

[Gerald Morgan]

Well, that's true.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah. And that's the point. That's important. Cuz that rug needs to be pulled if we want the dying to stop. I've talked about how false empathy creates real victims. This idea that, hey, Ukraine, they need more, isn't it? It's terrible. People are dying. Okay, sure. So we've given them basically a blank check, right? Has it stopped the dying or has it led to more dying? Let's be honest here, right? That was. Everyone was playing on the string of empathy. And sure, we saw what happened. You felt horrible for the people in Ukraine, the freedom fighters, people who wanted to protect their country, their hair, I get that. But I also understand why some Russian people would feel galvanized. Doesn't mean that I agree with them. But all of our money in the.

[Josh Firestein]

First year, you go, well, yeah, okay, yeah, yeah, they invaded. Yeah. Hey, here's some missiles, here's some guns, here's some tanks. Go kick some ass. Go take your country back with it after three years, right. And multiple deal after multiple deal and.

[Gerald Morgan]

Offensives that turned down, you're like, well.

[Steven Crowder]

Hey, yeah, now The United States, our funding, because it's more than all of these European nations combined. It is the foundation, it's the premise for Ukraine to continue the dying, to continue the kidnapping of their own citizens, including in some cases people who really have no business being in the military to throw them to the front lines of the meat grinder. They can't do that without our constant funding. So please tell me how that's compassionate. You can comment below. Honestly, the alternative, if it's the worst case alternative, that it were to become a part of Russia, I still would say less death. Now, I'm not saying that that's right, but what I am saying is you need to know that your dollars have funded a giant death machine that is inescapable. So let me ask you this. This is the final peace plan. Is it actually only screwing the Ukraine? As you know, the leftists are writing out there right now. This is from the Atlantic. It says his Trump's proposal to end the war isn't a peace plan, it's a reward for aggression. Just that premise before we get to the points. There's no reward for aggression from a third party nation throughout human history. You understand that? You know what the reward is for aggression? The spoils of war. Yeah, right. That's the reward for aggression. In other words, if the United States did not help intercede financially, Russia would already have their rewards. So this is, if anything, this is a curtailed form of spoils of war. They're not getting as much as they would get if we didn't get involved. Ukraine vs take everyone else out. Ukraine, Russia. Guess what? They're Russia. They are, Rush. That's what happens.

[Josh Firestein]

Historically, a reward for aggression would be a US sponsored coup, not like 2014 and then giving all of Ukraine.

[Steven Crowder]

Right, exactly.

[Josh Firestein]

Russia. That would be in a reward for aggression.

[Steven Crowder]

Right. So, and I just, I always go back to Barack Obama telling mitt Romney the 1980s called I Want the policy back when he said that Russia was a threat. So they completely, completely flipped. All right, so let's go through these points and we're actually going through the points of this final peace plan. You can go and check the reference and read it yourself. Point number one is it requires an immediate ceasefire. So Putin reportedly told Steve Witkoff that he was willing to freeze the invasion at the current lines. So that would be, at this point in time, good for both.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yes, because Putin hasn't agreed to a ceasefire yet.

[Steven Crowder]

Right.

[Gerald Morgan]

He hasn't really been willing to do that. So that's good. Yeah, freeze it where it is right now and stop people dying.

[Steven Crowder]

Freeze the lines right now. Now, I would bet you Zelensky be like, we want the lines to move back to right where it was before we lost all this. Wait a minute. You lost a lot of stuff. So you have to compromise. We will not compromise. Okay? No more money. Point number two, that there need to be direct talks between Ukraine and Russia. Meaning we're going to be out of this now. This is not our job. You guys have to start dealing with each other. Grow up. You two go into the room and settle it.

[Gerald Morgan]

It's like two kids fighting all the time. You're like, I've tried to intervene.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah.

[Gerald Morgan]

You guys figure it out.

[Steven Crowder]

I would ask you, what's the alternative? Keep doing what we're doing.

[Gerald Morgan]

Right.

[Steven Crowder]

And by the way, it's impossible to do with someone like Zelensky. I will go to table, negotiate. All right, look, here's a very long table. Putin had it imported. He's like, no, no, no. Now I want to change the deal. Okay? So you guys hash it out, take us out of it. Point number three, of course Ukraine would not be able to join NATO, which Russia has said for a very long. That is their red line. They've been concerned about it, whether you believe them or not. Okay. But they have said that's a non negotiable. So Ukraine, no NATO. But they can, they can look for admission to the EU. So in February 2025, the Russian Foreign Minister, Dmitry Peskov said that Ukraine has the sovereign right to join.

[Gerald Morgan]

So they should be good with.

[Steven Crowder]

That's from a Russian spokesperson. Effectively themselves and Trump. This plan would, I guess, include some pretty robust security guarantees from EU nations as well if this were to happen. So no NATO, yes eu. Okay, verdict here. What's the alternate? This is probably the best compromise for Ukraine. If Ukraine throws a fit. If Zelensky throws a fit, that means he wants NATO, which means he wants all of the things. You guys understand that, right?

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah.

[Steven Crowder]

Like if you get to the point where someone says we need to be able to join NATO, you understand that? That is saying we will make no concessions or compromises with Russia, who by the way, have largely kicked our ass. It's delusional.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah. And it may be good for Ukraine to be a part of NATO, but it's not good for the rest of the world. Certainly not good for Europe to have Ukraine as NATO at that point. Because if that's the case right now, then we are technically supposed to be at war with Russia.

[Steven Crowder]

Right? Yeah. Point Number four, as far as the territory, this is a big one. Right. So Russia would sort of keep their de facto control of the gains that they've seen in Eastern Ukraine. Ukraine would still have access to the. The Dnipro river and the Zaporizhzhia nuclear. Sorry, sorry. The. The Dnipro river, the Zaporizhzhia power plant. The nuclear power plant would actually be transferred to American control.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah.

[Steven Crowder]

That's a big one, right? That's a pretty big one as I understand it, too. I don't know, because last time we covered this, that's just outside the lines of Ukrainian control.

[Gerald Morgan]

The lines wouldn't freeze exactly where they are right now. They would move around just a little bit, but it is not, obviously not going back to pre invasion.

[Steven Crowder]

Well, they'd move around. For example, if you give American control, that would mean that Russia would be giving that up.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah, they'd have to push that back.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, exactly. So there you go. Alternative is, hey, Ukraine, take your chances with Russia having control of the nuclear plant. There would be a formal recognition of Russian control over Crimea, which I bet you is going to be a sticking point, of course, with. With Zelinsky. Trump was, of course, strategically vague about this point when he talked about it last night in the Oval Office. Deal that you have with Russia, does it include recognizing Russia's sovereignty over Crimea? Well, everything is good. Look, I just want to see the war end. I don't care if they're both happy. They both sign an agreement. I have no favorites. I don't want to have any favorites. I want to have a deal to. So that ends up being obviously better off. It's better for Russia, but Ukraine has. They have no hand to play here. It's necessary for them.

[Gerald Morgan]

That's the alternative. People are looking at this, like, in this very myopic way, like, oh, okay, well, if we could just have Russia get out. They're the aggressor. Fine. We asked them, they said no. What now? Same thing on the Crimea. It's been over a decade. What do you guys.

[Josh Firestein]

It's counterproductive. What, eight years between Crimea being taken and Ukraine being invaded by Russia again?

[Steven Crowder]

Right? Yeah.

[Josh Firestein]

I mean, it was before your time. Now you're here, you took office. Did you campaign on that? Did you campaign on taking Crimea back?

[Gerald Morgan]

Build up your military in an effort to do that? Did you start kind of strengthening your alliance to prevent an invasion that would further. I mean, what steps did they take? And why are we where we are today?

[Steven Crowder]

Do you know what the truth is not a single other nation has effectively built up their military to the capacity that they need. Only the United States. Because it's all been predicated on the United States picking up the slack. Yeah, screw you, rest of the world militarily. Start taking care. Start owning your own shit. All right, Point number five in this deal, completely unclear. I'm sorry. I can make no sense of it. So you can go and read it. I don't. Am going through this point by point.

[Gerald Morgan]

We don't want to get admonished.

[Steven Crowder]

No, I don't want to get admonished. I'm just letting you know, someone can comment and let me know what it is that. It just seems very difficult to.

[Josh Firestein]

Yeah, I'm sure somebody really understands it.

[Steven Crowder]

Point number six in this deal, of course, Ukraine would sign the mineral rights deal with the United States. That would be great for Ukraine because the United States would have a vested interest, sort of a de facto security interest in protecting these mineral rights with Ukraine. Now, remember, this was a sticking point before where Zelensky was like, we will not do this. We will always keep our minerals. Really? Okay. Hey, there are the Russians. No more money. Good luck.

[Gerald Morgan]

They took your minerals, by the way.

[Steven Crowder]

Yes, we will always have our mineral. Where'd they go?

[Gerald Morgan]

No, this was the thing that bothered me, I guess the most about this is that this obviously gave them security guarantees. It gave them ties to the United States that they didn't have without giving them NATO coverage right. Now, of course, you could argue that if they'd been in NATO before, that this wouldn't have happened in the first place, but, yes, that's fantasy land. We're not there. We are in a different place right now. If you give it to them right now, it's a really big problem.

[Steven Crowder]

Right.

[Gerald Morgan]

They could have gotten something very, very close.

[Steven Crowder]

Well, yeah. And let me bring you to the next point here. And we were talking about this in run through. So point number seven in this deal is the lifting of sanctions and increased sort of economic cooper between the United States and Russia. That could be good for everybody. Now, I understand you can't trust Russia any further than you can throw them. But let me present to you a possible scenario. Right? You guys all know about the tariff war. I know that they've moved on from it in the media. Something about, okay, talking about Nazis on CNN right now. Okay, so the tariff wars, specifically China. You don't trust Putin? Okay, I don't. Of course I don't trust Putin either. Do you believe that Putin is more untrustworthy than Xi Jinping? Okay, what if we live in a world where as a result of this conflict, we said, we know that you guys have been obviously seriously damaged by this war and if you promise to play ball, we're actually not going to put these same kinds of tariffs on you so you can build up your manufacturing sector and cripple China for a lot of raw materials for parts. I'm not saying that it's ideal. We don't want to superpower Russia, but that doesn't really just happen through manufacturing. Would we not be better off potentially having the option to work with Russia as opposed we already know the devil that is China. And of course China has been communist. They have maintained remaining communist. Their citizens are communists. At least Russia has somewhat moved the other direction. If you have to pick for let's say aluminum, automotive parts, raw materials, would you rather it come from China or is there an opportunity perhaps where Russia could become maybe a valuable trading partner and that would prevent them from running into the arms of communist China. What do you got? Just a thought. Just a thought. Keep the tariffs on China. You know what, we're gonna make an exception for you Russia for the next, I don't know, X number of years and see how it works out.

[Josh Firestein]

What's the economic situation in Russia? Is it not great?

[Steven Crowder]

It's not great.

[Josh Firestein]

So it'd be a fairly cheap place to manufacture.

[Steven Crowder]

It would certainly, yeah, China maybe more.

[Josh Firestein]

Expensive than China, but still very cheap.

[Steven Crowder]

And if at the same time we said, by the way, eu, okay, you're going to start buying, as we have already started, you're going to start buying more energy from us and less from Russia where we could help transfer them from an energy based economy which of course kneecaps the rest of the world more significantly than them being largely a manufacturing or raw materials economy. Right. Russia makes a huge portion of their, their income from energy.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yes.

[Steven Crowder]

Largely from Europe, who also condemns them at the same time. I know what you're saying. None of this makes sense. Don't worry, it doesn't. It's just a thought. And so here's where we are. Concessions need to be made by both sides. And a lot of people talked about this is one thing that's very telling to me. And by the way, if you are not, we're gonna have a half my half Asian lawyer, Bill Richmond, a barely legal on a Supreme Court case that relates to your constitutional right to carry. So click that button, you can Join Rumble Premium, $99 a year. You get the wonderful co promoter hand Etched Master Mug Club is Rumble Premium. Rumble Premium is Mug Club. You get the whole thing ad free and an additional 100% more show. If not, try it for $9 a month. Otherwise this all goes away. Remember how everyone was talking about with Russia, they were saying, well, they're just gonna march on through Poland. I never really bought that. And I always thought that, well, actually, you know what, at this point in time, if I happen to be Poland, I would be more concerned that Russia would maybe be a threat to us if they didn't get a deal done with Ukraine. I would believe that they are more likely to stop at Ukraine, for example, if some concessions are made, as opposed to the alternative scenario is they steamroll through Ukraine and, oh, here we are. Well, the Polish president there, President Duda, said, de facto, this piece should, in my personal opinion, come down to the fact that neither side will be able to say that it won this war because each side, in some sense, will have to step down. Ukraine will also have to step down in some sense, because that's what will probably happen. He's saying that will probably happen, meaning it absolutely will happen anyway, so if Poland is saying, hey, this is something that needs to happen, hey, all of you folks out there who were supporting, you know, the Kinzingers, I don't know, Crenshaw, of course, everyone on the left were supporting and ever getting funding for this war based on the premise that they're gonna march. Think about Poland. Think about Poland. And now the Polish president is saying, yeah, this is a good. You probably should do this. What's your argument now? Aside from Orange man bad friends with friends with Putin, and Marco Rubio actually laid this out pretty brilliantly yesterday.

[Josh Firestein]

Well, I don't know, Bob. By the end of the week, I'm hopeful that we can get to something quickly. And I remain, you know, hopeful that we can get something done because this is a terrible, terrible war and it needs to end here's. Because it has no military solution. There is no military solution to this war. We have to be frank. You know, Russia is not just going to roll over Ukraine and take the whole country. And Ukraine's not going to push them all the way back to where they were before 2014. So what I would say we're involved in is understanding what is the Russian position. We have a better understanding of that now because we've actually speak to them after three years of not speaking to them, what is the Ukrainian position? And figure out, are these guys even in the same neighborhood? Because if they're in Completely different zip codes. Then we may have to conclude that they're so far apart that peace is impossible at this time.

[Steven Crowder]

If Ukraine is in neighborhood, it is Chelsea. That is gay area of New York. So at least with this.

[Gerald Morgan]

Something he would say.

[Steven Crowder]

Yes, I bet you are in neighborhood San Francisco, the Bay Area. So at least with this. Look, big part of this deal is. All right, we've been trying to. We've been trying to deal with it. We've been trying to be the diplomat here. Here are the terms. We counted to three. You guys hash it out. You know how this ends. If you don't and the ball is in their court, the blood is off our hands.

[Josh Firestein]

They'll fight until the end of time. Peace plan for Ukraine.

[Steven Crowder]

5,000 soldiers are being killed every week. You would have never had that war if I were president, I guarantee you that.

[Gerald Morgan]

I think he's probably right on that point, by the way. And so I just wanted to come back to one of the points that you made and then just kind of button this whole thing up. Switching them over to a manufacturing. Probably not going to happen in any reasonable time frame. But here's a. Here's the point that's broader. Right. Energy is their thing. I got it.

[Steven Crowder]

It.

[Gerald Morgan]

When we went back up to Nina Jankowicz earlier and she said, this is one of the strongest statements that you can say, that Europe will stand up, they will hold the line. No, the strongest statement that Europe can make about standing up and holding the line is stop funding Russia in this war to the tune of more money than you're funding Ukraine. Yeah, that would be the strongest stance they could take. Russia's always going to be an energy guy. That's fine. We don't want to push them in the arms of China. That's also fine. Are they better off when they're participating in the world economy? Yes, those things are good. Do we want Russia to be a superpower? No, no, not at all. I'm sorry. Their citizens had a shot at freedom. They had a shot at having something better. And they immediately ran back into the arms of communism. It's like a prisoner who's been there for 50 years gets released and immediately commits a crime to go back into the prison.

[Steven Crowder]

They didn't run into the prison back in the arms of communism. They ran back into the arms of a de facto dictator.

[Gerald Morgan]

They ran back into the state taking care of them. It was very clear they didn't know what to do with the free market. And they were like, this is too crazy and too uncertain. Certain for us. I don't think that's ever going to happen there. But we have to live in a reality. Everybody right now that's out there saying that we should be pushing harder on Ukraine hasn't put a plan in place. No amount of money does this, by the way.

[Steven Crowder]

Right.

[Gerald Morgan]

You can give them a trillion dollars tomorrow. This does not change the reality on the ground. Unless you provide them with people to actually fly the planes. Because I don't think they have nearly enough pilots to actually do what they need to do. Unless you provide them with soldiers on the ground to be able to push people back. Unless you provide them with ongoing security guarantees for the rest of time.

[Steven Crowder]

Right.

[Gerald Morgan]

That's the only thing that does this. And the world is not.

[Steven Crowder]

That's kind of what we did in the Cold War where we sort of moved some of our dependence, at least our trading to China. Let's move it back, crisscross, move it around. At this point it's like, ah, okay, China, you don't get to be someone we rely on account of the fact that you guys are communist dicks who killed like 10 million and tens of millions of people and you guys still support and have statues of the guy who did it. So we got our eye on them. But we're gonna take our chances with Russia right now a little bit because they have an incentive if we have to pick from your commie craft crap or these semi commie crap artists who may have a chance at straightening up and flying. Right. All right, let's give them the old college try. It's just a thought. I'm not saying we should trust them. I'm saying there could be some good to come out of this. And we do need to be aware of the most significant threat, of course, which is not just the United States, to the entire world, is China. And by the way, you know who would agree with that statement if they were honest? The left. Yeah, because they believe the greatest threat is climate change.

[Josh Firestein]

Right.

[Steven Crowder]

We believe the greatest threat. We believe the greatest threat is fascism is the destruction of freedom, for example, falling birth rates, the anti humanist agenda. Okay. Of course you would say, oh, okay, biggest power there is China. But the left would also say, wait a second, we're most afraid the biggest threat is climate change. And the biggest emitter, who doesn't give a shit as to your international agreements and will continue to create coal plants and will continue to of unsafe unclean mining extraction processes, refining China. We should all be on the same page. You should believe they're the biggest Threat? Because you think that climate change is the biggest existential threat to the world. We think that. Well, you know, communism is. Hey, let's find some common ground. Maybe there's some concessions to be made. Let me tell you, where you don't have to make any concessions is during your mortgage refinancing.

[Josh Firestein]

Hello, Chase Vanguard. Too big to fail. How can I help you? Oh, yeah, sure. We can help you refinance your house. How's 28% sound? Oh, well, maybe your kids shouldn't have gotten so sick. Maybe you go tell them to eat one of those blue popsicles or something. Okay, well, best I can do is 27 and a half percent. And to be honest, you sound like a very selfish person. Is that really how you want your family to remember you? Oh, it's just you and the kid, huh? Well, my heart goes out to you and yeah, that's very sad. So I think I'd be willing to give you 29%. That's too big to fail. Alright, sounds great. Yeah. Yeah, sounds great. And hey, maybe your son and you can learn a lesson from all this. Yeah.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah.

[Josh Firestein]

Alright, well, payment is due at the end of the month or you, sir, will be setting a table for one. Alright, don't get scammed on your next loan. Let American financing help you you regain control of your finances. Go to americanfinancing.net Crowder or call 1-800-974-6500 nmls-182334. Gotta say that I wonder if they.

[Steven Crowder]

Could help us finance Crimea.

[Gerald Morgan]

I don't think it's up for sale.

[Steven Crowder]

Interest rates spare nobody.

[Josh Firestein]

What do you call it? Ukrainian financing or Russian financing?

[Steven Crowder]

I just take it. Hey, it's time for my half Asian lawyer, Bill Richmond. He's here to talk about a Supreme Court case relating to concealed carry. Let's get to hardly legal. Mr. Well, Kim Jong bill on Instagram and It's Hardly Legal is the show on YouTube. And that's where you guys take legal questions, right? Give advice? We do.

[Bill Richmond]

Yeah. Real, real Americans, real legal issues call in anonymously. We give them a little advice and we laugh along the way. We've got headliner comedians in third chair.

[Steven Crowder]

Oh, very nice. And do you ever deliberately give badly legal advice?

[Bill Richmond]

No. Never deliberately. Yeah.

[Steven Crowder]

So just me?

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah.

[Steven Crowder]

So this is an interesting case that you brought to our attention. The Supreme Court rejected. There was an appeal from Minnesota. Right. And I have a clip here. They wanted to reinstate a ban on gun carry permits for 18 to 20 year olds. Correct. That's what it was, okay, let me show the clip and then have you explain it, because this is a pretty big deal. The Supreme Court has decided it will not review an appeals court ruling that block a gun ban in Minnesota. That means Minnesota's gun ban for adults under 21 years old will not be enforced. The 8th U.S. circuit Court of Appeals unanimously determined the 2003 law violated the 2nd and 14th Amendments. The ruling finds Minnesota can't legally Prevent those aged 18 to 20 years old from having a public carry permit due to their age.

[Gerald Morgan]

Hmm.

[Steven Crowder]

Okay, so explain to us the ins and outs here. What was the complaint coming from? From Minnesota. What's the legal term?

[Bill Richmond]

Yeah. So. So really, the challenge was a number of organizations that have 18 to 20 year olds that want to be able to carry handguns in public.

[Steven Crowder]

Sure.

[Bill Richmond]

And the law since 2003 in Minnesota and every state's a little bit different, said that you could not. Right. So even though you could legally possess one, you could not be carrying it in public. And so finally, they had a couple of individuals, I think it was three gentlemen and one lady, who were all between the ages of 18 to 20 at the time. They were denied the application to be able to be able to get that carry license.

[Steven Crowder]

So with the Supreme Court, with their decision, does this mean that automatically now in Minnesota, they can get their carry permit?

[Bill Richmond]

So what that means is the appellate court ruled in favor of the kids and said, you are not actually kids. You were adults in the historical context. And then the other side, the state appealed it to the U.S. supreme Court, and the U.S. supreme Court denied the writ of certiory, which means they said no.

[Steven Crowder]

Nope.

[Bill Richmond]

Looks good to us.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yep, go for it. Hold on, hold on.

[Bill Richmond]

Carry on, Bill.

[Gerald Morgan]

They just. The Supreme Court just gave them the big middle fingers. I. That's. It just feels better.

[Bill Richmond]

No, no, no, no, no. It's two middle fingers.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah, exactly. Thank you.

[Steven Crowder]

Thank you.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah.

[Bill Richmond]

Okay.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah, they did well. They gave. It was even worse. They went.

[Josh Firestein]

They even did the Ross.

[Steven Crowder]

It's like. It's weird. Gorsuch was doing mechanical sounds.

[Gerald Morgan]

It feels better that way.

[Steven Crowder]

But here's the. Funny, I will say this as, you know, a layman.

[Gerald Morgan]

Poor choice of words.

[Steven Crowder]

When they write these complaints. Right. And they petition it, they use. I'm kind of surprised. Like, you would think there'd be some accountability or some kind of process when you're bringing this to court. Like, hey, yeah. But that's a lie. So the debunk stat, we've gone through this so many times, but it was included in Their petition that firearms are the leading cause of death among children and teens. And Governor Whitmer just talked about this again, it's not even close. That number that you see, it includes youth all the way up to age 24. Okay. And like 80, 85% of the kill kids who were killed by guns were like 15 to 19 years old and they were gang members. Okay. It was. If you take that out and you actually include children, what people view as children, guns aren't even top five. It's not even close. So they included that to justify, ah, we can't let, we can't let 20 year olds carry guns. Which also makes no sense because they're not toddlers.

[Bill Richmond]

Right. So there's so many rights that are allowed to be had. The argument of the state of Minnesota was very interesting because it was almost the opposite of what you would normally feel like the left would argue. They were basically saying, hey, look, there is this small group of people that we think statistically are more dangerous than every other type of person.

[Gerald Morgan]

What?

[Bill Richmond]

And Those people are 18 to 20 year olds of both genders, everyone across the room. And you could actually hear the echoes of like. So you're able to look at the actions of a particular demographic of people and then decide to treat them differently, despite the constitution.

[Gerald Morgan]

Right, well, there's some use for that, I guess.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah.

[Gerald Morgan]

You know, that'd be kind of a hard thing. But here's the thing. Can we start with driving? Did they, did they look at cars and say, well, 18 to 24, 24 year olds, you're probably more likely to get into an accident. They're newer drivers, so therefore you shouldn't be able to drive.

[Bill Richmond]

Here's the thing, the car argument is even harder to make because you don't.

[Steven Crowder]

Have a constitutional right, you don't have.

[Bill Richmond]

A bill of right or an amendment directly related to the right to bear arms.

[Steven Crowder]

I know a guy who had a glass eye. He passed his driving test by memorizing the letters.

[Gerald Morgan]

Well, that's cheating.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah.

[Gerald Morgan]

And also good on him.

[Steven Crowder]

Yeah.

[Bill Richmond]

Wait, isn't that just how a Tesla drives? It just memorizes the roads and it's.

[Steven Crowder]

Like, I got this right. Oh, fuck.

[Josh Firestein]

I failed my eye exam in the state of Texas just canning me a license.

[Gerald Morgan]

Yeah, we didn't care.

[Steven Crowder]

I'm not gonna lie. I never actually did take a driving test because I came from Quebec and they didn't under. It was a learner's permit. And when I came, they didn't understand it. They're like, ah, whatever. Here's your license. And then I had to go through it for my motorcycle, my class C license, but not even a fender bender.

[Gerald Morgan]

There you go.

[Steven Crowder]

I've driven I don't know how many, probably millions of miles at this point. Here's the funny thing too though, you mentioned that demographic. And I want you to direct this to whatever you think is most pertinent. We've talked about this before. Concealed carry permit holders, they are the most law abiding demographic that you can, if you were to take them, isolate them, group of Americans, they literally have lower crime rates than police officers. Off duty police officers. It's not even close. We actually have right here the fire. The firearm violation rate for concealed carry holders is 1.4 per 100,000. And with police officers it's 16.5 per 100,000. The overall crime rates to this one is fascinating and we make all references publicly available. So overall crime rates, if these demographics, you have concealed carry holders, what's the overall crime rate? The overall crime rate is about 10.8. Call it 11 per 100,000. Compare that to the general population. So people out there are told to be afraid of their concealed carry. They could take it out at any time and just become the General Public. Is 3800 per 100,000. 10.8 to 3800 crimes. Wow, think about that.

[Gerald Morgan]

How did they deal with that question, Bill? Because their whole argument was based on this group being more likely to more dangerous.

[Bill Richmond]

I guess the court of appeals just said these stats don't make any sense. Yeah, they just said, I don't know.

[Steven Crowder]

What to do with that.

[Bill Richmond]

I mean, literally, it's one of those like super professional statements, like this is what the other side says, we find no merit in it. And then, you know, because it didn't actually add up. And here's the thing is there are already restrictions related to the permitting process. Right. So you have to go through the background check, you have to do a safety training and those things are still upheld. So it's not like all of a sudden we went from, okay, now 18 to 20 year olds are given a gun and a Red Bull and sent off into the streets.

[Steven Crowder]

Right.

[Bill Richmond]

You know, I mean, it's just. But that's. If you read some of the articles, that's what you would think.

[Steven Crowder]

It's just the new red. Some guy cliff diving, shooting a mag, shooting a dead eagle.

[Bill Richmond]

Here's a gold one in one hand, a silver in another, and here's some tracer rounds while you're at it. No, I Mean, it's not like that at all. And that was actually cited by the 8th Circuit. They're like, would you guys already have a lot of these restrictions that you passed, those saying that they were really necessary to monitor everyone 18 or above? Right, right. So if you already got those in place, why do you have to do a blanket over this age group? Anyways?

[Steven Crowder]

Can I ask you, because this is something that's been a point of discussion for a long time in the firearm community. Is this a signal at all or what are the chances of there being a national sort of constitutional carry? Do you think the Supreme Court would recognize that? Do you think we're heading toward that?

[Bill Richmond]

I think, I think that's the exact right question to be asked right now because there are multiple circuits that all have, are in different stages of dealing with this issue. So for example, Colorado had an age ban. It was upheld. The 11th Circuit had one, it was struck down. The 4th Circuit just had new oral arguments on it. This one was out of the 10th Circuit. And then you had the 5th Circuit, that covers Texas and Louisiana. They ruled against age restrictions. So. So we're looking at a circuit split, which is almost one of the perfect opportunities for the Supreme Court to come in and go, you guys say this, you guys say that. These guys win. Mike drop.

[Steven Crowder]

Do you think that maybe some of this is not because the second Amendment is pretty clear? So either, okay, you have the right to own a firearm, then some people argue about carrying or not. Do you think some of the waters here are muddied because we're not super clear as to what defines an adult? In other words, 18, but 21 to drink. Do you think this might actually be a de facto way of settling that issue where it's okay, either you're an adult or you're not, so you get to enjoy your Second Amendment rights or you don't?

[Bill Richmond]

Correct. That was a big part of the argument, what is an adult? And some of it was a little confusing because there were restrictions in the past for 18 to 20 year olds voting. And then there was, then there was a time when they were not. And then there was restrictions on certain land ownership versus non land ownership over time. And these were the statutes that were talked about over time. But eventually what they came down to is they said, look, this was meant to allow adults to have the right to bear arms with the minimal amount of restrictions set out in the Constitution and the other case law that's come out. And they said, there's no specific reason why we treat these folks as adults now. And as the founders had said, adults should be able to carry handguns in public.

[Steven Crowder]

Right? There you go. So you know what? I guess. I guess Johnny Cash was wrong. Do take your guns to town. The show is hardly legal with Bill Richmond on YouTube, I think. Are you on Rumble, too?

[Bill Richmond]

Yeah. Rumble, Itunes, Spotify. Yep.

[Steven Crowder]

So go. And we're going to take some more of your legal questions today if you're not a Rumble Premium member, because it's chat Thursday and you always have a lot of legal questions because you don't want to pay the retainer. He's pretty expensive. Notice my cheap clothes that I wear all the time. For those of you who are not members, we're going to be sending you to Tim Pool right now. He has a lot to talk about. Let's go to Mud Club. Rumble Premium.

[Gerald Morgan]

It.