Who Are the Real Bolsheviks & What Do they Want with America?

Summary

---

Louder with Crowder

Episode: "Who Are the Real Bolsheviks & What Do They Want with America?"

Date: April 14, 2026
Host: Steven Crowder & Panel
Summary Prepared by Podcast Summarizer

---

Episode Overview

This episode explores the resurgence of interest in the Bolshevik Revolution and draws connections between historical Bolshevism and modern left-wing movements in America. Steven Crowder, joined by his co-hosts and guest panelists, also discusses recent tensions between former President Trump and the Vatican, dissecting differing positions on immigration, borders, and globalism. Satirical commentary on progressive social trends and a critique of current left-wing discourse are woven throughout, maintaining the show’s provocative and comedic tone.

---

Major Discussion Points & Insights

1. Satirical Cold Opens & Social Commentary

Timestamps: 01:52–06:02

• Crowder and panel lampoon contemporary progressive trends, including Pride events and drag activism.
• A satirical musical interlude parodies the idea that "LGBT wants to rule the world," with exaggerated lyrics poking at left-wing activism.
• Commentary on anti-ICE protests in Chicago devolving into “degeneracy,” featuring unconventional protest stunts (e.g., dildo-throwing).
• Ongoing criticism of leftist protest culture and perceived lack of seriousness or substance.

Quote:

• “Everything from the left just has to be degeneracy.” – Main Host, 09:53

2. 'BuzzFeed’s How to Spot a Conservative Woman' Segment

Timestamps: 14:27–24:07

• BuzzFeed article ridiculed for "negative" depiction of conservative women, focusing on “secret signs” like not liking Barbie/Taylor Swift or preferring masculine men.
• Crowder suggests that in media circles like Hollywood, non-political or moderate stances often indicate secret conservative leanings.
• Discussion on women’s social behavior and political concealment for safety in left-leaning environments.

Notable Quotes:

• “If someone in Hollywood says, ‘I don’t want to discuss politics,’ it means they most likely lean right.” – Main Host, 15:36
• “If a woman likes masculine men, according to BuzzFeed, that’s a red flag.” – Main Host, 22:42

3. Trump vs. the Pope: Ideological and Policy Rift

Timestamps: 25:48–39:42

• Comparison of Trump’s America First nationalism with the Pope’s (Pope Leo) positions on crime, immigration, Islam, and climate change.
• Direct quotes juxtapose each side’s philosophy: strong borders, welfare, and foreign policy (Trump) vs. inclusivity, peace, and climate action (Pope Leo).
• Crowder critiques the Pope for allegedly overstepping into political advocacy and not confronting “leftist evils” (e.g., feminism, LGBTQ, globalism) as forcefully as American policy.
• The show frames the Vatican’s outreach to Islam and climate advocacy as “globalist” and incompatible with traditional Christian/nationalist values.

Notable Quotes:

• “It’s not about collecting information from as many resources as possible to make the best inference you can. They just don’t want half of this country to exist.” – Main Host, 20:11
• “The truth is going to divide us and you're going to tell me... the God of Islam and the God of the Bible are the same God. They’re not. The attributes are completely different.” – Main Host, 37:15

4. Christianity vs. Islam: On Theological Compatibility

Timestamps: 40:07–47:05

• Extended conversation challenging claims that “Muslims love Jesus,” emphasizing differences in doctrine (denial of divinity/resurrection).
• Panel argues for “honest disagreement” as opposed to what they view as public relations gloss from both the Vatican and some commentators (e.g., Tucker Carlson).
• Broader warning that blurring lines between Christianity and Islam undermines American and Western identity.

memorable exchange:

• “If Christians let Islam in the door and say, ‘we’re all the same,’ it’s done. You lose your country; the fight is lost.” – Main Host, 44:21

5. Transparency, Self-Censorship & Media Narratives

Timestamps: 47:28–52:08

• Criticism of modern media’s shift from external censorship to self-censorship due to algorithms, cancellation, and clickbait culture.
• Crowder promotes transparency, contrasts leftist “gatekeepers” with his own approach of providing references and fact-based arguments.
• Notes that sensationalism often outperforms accuracy in the current attention economy.

Quote:

• “It’s actually a net negative to be transparent because people will know that you are full of crap.” – Main Host, 50:10

6. Educating on Bolshevism: What (and Who) Were the Bolsheviks?

Timestamps: 52:08–71:36

• Segment opens with concern that lack of education about Bolshevik and communist atrocities (Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot) is deliberate, to protect modern leftist ideology.
• Bolshevik Revolution Explained:
  • Bolsheviks defined as a radical Marxist faction (1903–1917) led by Lenin; key opponent was the Mensheviks.
  • The Bolsheviks were violently anti-God, anti-family, and anti-community, focused on centralized elite control.
  • Common misconception addressed: that Bolshevism was a “Jewish” phenomenon – host presents proportional data on Bolshevik Jewish membership (about 5% overall, higher in leadership) but emphasizes the majority were ethnic Russians, and that religious Jews opposed Bolshevism.
  • The “Jewish Bolshevism” trope traced to Nazi propaganda.
  • Core legacy: Bolshevism lives on, rebranded in modern American leftist and academic circles.

Notable Quotes:

• “Anyone who uses the term Bolshevik Jew interchangeably is uneducated or lying to you... There are still Bolsheviks around. Wherever the left exists, you get modern Bolsheviks.” – Main Host, 12:05, 52:52
• “There were no faithful practicing Jews who wanted to maintain their practices... who were Bolsheviks. They were secular.” – Main Host, 59:47

7. Modern Bolshevism: Where It Exists Today

Timestamps: 66:46–71:36

• Crowder asserts that Bolshevism now takes the form of left-wing secular humanism, seen in academia, activism, and blue-state politics.
• Discusses the Seattle Lenin Statue as a symbol: notes it was rejected in Russia but is celebrated in left-leaning Seattle.
• Warns against mistaking ethnic or religious identity (e.g. Jewishness) for ideological drivers; insists “the constant is leftism.”

Notable Quotes:

• “The threat still exists. There are still people pushing it right now because it’s not going to be done at the tip of a bayonet. But... you had to destroy godly institutions like the family, like community, like moral absolutes... and replace it with a new deity. And that deity... is always the state.” – Main Host, 71:44

---

Notable Quotes & Timestamps

• “Everything from the left just has to be degeneracy.” – Main Host, 09:53
• “If a woman likes masculine men, according to BuzzFeed, that’s a red flag.” – Main Host, 22:42
• “It’s not about collecting information from as many resources as possible to make the best inference you can. They just don’t want half of this country to exist.” – Main Host, 20:11
• “If Christians let Islam in the door and say, ‘we’re all the same,’ it’s done. You lose your country; the fight is lost.” – Main Host, 44:21
• “Anyone who uses the term Bolshevik Jew interchangeably is uneducated or lying to you... There are still Bolsheviks around. Wherever the left exists, you get modern Bolsheviks.” – Main Host, 12:05, 52:52
• “The threat still exists. There are still people pushing it right now because it’s not going to be done at the tip of a bayonet. But... you had to destroy godly institutions like the family, like community, like moral absolutes... and replace it with a new deity. And that deity... is always the state.” – Main Host, 71:44

---

Important Segment Timestamps

• 01:52–06:02: Satirical takes on progressive activism
• 14:27–24:07: BuzzFeed’s “How to Spot a Conservative Woman”
• 25:48–39:42: Trump vs. Pope Leo: Borders, welfare, foreign policy
• 40:07–47:05: Compatibility of Christianity and Islam
• 47:28–52:08: Media, transparency, self-censorship
• 52:08–71:36: Bolshevik history, myth-busting, modern implications

---

Takeaways for the Uninitiated

• This episode uses satire, cultural critique, and history to argue that “Bolshevik” or hard left ideas are alive within contemporary US progressive politics.
• A large portion is devoted to debunking the idea of "Jewish Bolshevism," insisting leftism, not ethnicity, is the relevant ideological threat.
• The Trump-Pope clash is treated as emblematic of a deeper rift between globalist (Vatican) and nationalist (MAGA) visions, especially on immigration and social issues.
• Strong warnings are issued against the conflation of Christian and Islamic theology in Western discourse and policy.
• The show closes by urging listeners to focus on ideological underpinnings, not group identities, when diagnosing threats to American society.

---

Transcript

[Aura Advertiser]

Most people don't realize how much of their personal information is being bought and sold every day. Data brokers are making millions, pulling details about you from public records and the Internet, then packaging and selling it, usually without your consent. That's how your information lands in the hands of scammers, spammers, even stalkers. It's why you get endless robocalls and why ads seem to follow you everywhere. That's where Aura comes in. Aura actively removes your data from broker sites and keeps it off. They also instantly alert you if your information shows up in a breach or on the dark web. But Aura goes beyond data protection. With one app, you get a vpn, antivirus, password manager, spam, call protection, dark web monitoring, and even up to $5 million in identity theft insurance. All backed by 24, 7 US based fraud support. Other companies might just sell credit, monitoring or just a vpn. Aura gives you all of it together at the same price. Competitors charge for just one service. Start your free trial [e-mail] hidden protect yourself [e-mail] hidden marketing is hard.

[Libsyn Ads Representative]

But I'll tell you a little secret. It doesn't have to be. Let me point something out. You're listening to a podcast right now and it's great. You love the host. You seek it out and download it. You listen to it while driving, working out, cooking, even going to the bathroom. Podcasts are a pretty close companion. And this is a podcast ad. Did I get your attention? You can reach great listeners like yourself with podcast advertising from Libsyn Ads. Choose from hundreds of top podcasts offering host endorsements or run a pre produced ad like this one across thousands of shows. To reach your target audience in their favorite podcasts with Libsyn Ads, go to Libsyn ads.com that's L I B S Y N ads.com today.

[Main Host]

Welcome to the lineup live. Yeah, I think we might need to take those down. I don't know if something's wrong with my eyes. Am I going blind? You start seeing halos before you go blind. I have no idea. I know they're not angels. Speaking of not angels, Bolsheviks. We're going to talk about that today. I've talked about it quite a bit in the past. The Bolshevik Revolution. If you follow this channel for any significant period of time now, it's sort of made a resurgence. People are talking about it, but they're discussing it wrong. And I wonder why that is. I've always asked why can't we talk about, you know, Leninist Russia, the Bolshevik, you know, sort of Post Bolshevik revolution, Russia, Stalin. I never learned about that in school. Did you? Why have we not learned about it? Considering the atrocities? Take a guess. We'll get into that more. Also the Pope and Trump. Trump and the Pope. Pump and tropes. Who's right, who's who's wrong. It may not exactly be who you think. Also buzzfeed wrote an article on how to spot a conservative woman. They think that's a bad thing. We'll talk that more on with the show. Everyone's so kind and friendly. Everyone's so organized.

[Co-host Gerald]

Everybody's having a great pride. It's like a space where no one judges anyone.

[Main Host]

Racist, homophobic, transphobic, piece of spinal.

[Guest or Contributor with controversial views]

We won't screw your life if you're gay and black. But if you make a peace, we will fight you. You must support our sick behavior and affront to Mother Nature. LGBT wants to rule the world.

[Main Host]

If you're a drag queen and you know it, shout greenhouse.

[Guest or Contributor with controversial views]

Here is my trans child. They think they're a horse takes me for a ride. They help me take your basic freedoms for my pleasure. Your tolerance must last forever. LGBT wants to rule the world. There's no room for your real world issues, just endless trends while the walls come tumbling down. When they do, we will all just blame you. Free speech completely hated straight jail if you won't date it. LGBT wants to rule the world. Genitals like a circumcision went too far with the incision. LGBT was to rule the world. Gay was just the COVID and very beginning. Look around, see how fast that lie is spinning. LGBT wants to rule. If you want your freedom. By any measure, the torrents can't last forever. LGBT wants to rule the world.

[Main Host]

Click Rumble Premium and join now for 99 annually or 9.99amonth to get the entirely ad free experience and an ever expanding roster of content creators and free speech. We'll just get right to it. I know it's. It's 11am on a weekday, which means we're here with you. That's the sound that you hear. I've unfortunately confined myself. I've tethered myself to the slurp for the rest of all time. But we have a heavy lift today. We're gonna get into the Bolshevik Revolution as well as the sort of, should we say, schism between the MAGA movement and the Vatican, the Catholic Church, which. Can't we just all get along? The answer's no. Captain Morgan, CEO. How are you?

[Co-host or Panelist]

Fantastic. It's gonna be a fun show. We're gonna piss Everybody off.

[Main Host]

I think it's a lot to get to. That's the truth. Go ahead. So you're good. You get it out of your system, I think. I don't know.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Maybe it'll come back later.

[Main Host]

Friday, Saturday, April 24th, 25th, at Comedy Avenue in Lawton, Oklahoma. Josh Firestein.

[Co-host Gerald]

Hey.

[Guest or Contributor]

Hey.

[Co-host Gerald]

How you doing? I'm good.

[Main Host]

Oh, yeah. Just ready for a really fun show, guys. Let's just try and restart. You were all a little flat. We were all a little tired, and nothing you both just said inspired confidence or the way you said it.

[Co-host Gerald]

I was waiting for you to talk again so I could interrupt you like Gerald.

[Main Host]

Oh, well, that would have been. Yeah, that would have aggravated me. And that. Bring the energy up.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Yeah.

[Main Host]

Doesn't really aggravate me when you do it, though. It aggravates me when, Gerald. Why? That's not fair. You just did it now. No, I know. You just did it now. Discipline your tongue. We're about to discipline your tongue. All right. Bring me my just Jewish shirt. Yeah. Oh, well, you know what? You'll be buried in that shirt.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Maybe.

[Main Host]

Yeah. We'll hang it from your mausoleum. What is it, laundry day? What's going. Why are there so many T shirts?

[Co-host Gerald]

Gerald seems like the kind of who already has his mausoleum built.

[Main Host]

Yeah, well, I do, so I don't want to judge.

[Co-host Gerald]

Oh, okay.

[Main Host]

I've told you this story. People were like, how do you. How do you. You know, what do you want to have done to you when you die? Which people ask me more frequently than they should to someone in their 30s. I don't care. I said, leave me out for the trash on Tuesday. Like, come on. That's disrespectful to people. I said, okay, you really. I really don't care. Whatever. Oh, you're like, you. You have to complete matters for your loved one. I said, okay, fine. Mausoleum. Biggest one we can find. And I'm going to turn it into a haunted house. Yes. So you guys made me do this how do you want to be buried? Comment. That's the question of the day. You want a mausoleum, or do you want to have your ashes scattered at sea like a.

[Co-host Gerald]

You should use that like a regular house in a neighborhood.

[Main Host]

Yes. Yeah.

[Co-host Gerald]

The rest of the neighbors have to just know that there's a. There's an empty house with a dead body in there.

[Main Host]

Yeah, I'll just grease some palms at the hoa.

[Co-host Gerald]

There you go. You don't have to tell them. They're not going to come by. They're gonna Knock on the door. Who's gonna answer? Not you.

[Main Host]

That's exactly right. It won't be. What could be me, Probably Gerald Caretaker. No idea. Hey, speaking of haunting, the spirit of Kat Aboga Zuga Dolla. Remember her? Kat Shabugamu who was running for office in Illinois? Well, she's no longer on the front lines there. You know the front lines against ice in Chicago. These are, by the way, these are. These are very difficult front lines. And my. I will say I respect anyone who's willing to. To go out there and risk life and limb to protest ice as they do in Chicago. Now using dildos.

[Co-host Gerald]

Oh, it's a four legged race.

[Main Host]

Everything from the left just has to be degeneracy.

[Co-host Gerald]

They spend money on a trophy.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Double sided dildo.

[Co-host Gerald]

Oh, I get it. A pinata climaxed.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Idiots.

[Main Host]

Oh, I don't know how they managed to take giant rubber pink purple dildos and make it not funny. They made it somehow unfun.

[Co-host Gerald]

I didn't see any of them going,

[Main Host]

ah, no, it's just everything is just like, hey, guys, isn't this clever? No, it's not. Also, I don't really remember when people talk about ice as though they're the Gestapo. I don't remember Jews having fun protesting the ss.

[Co-host Gerald]

Yeah.

[Main Host]

Ribbing them.

[Co-host Gerald]

They weren't playing cornhole.

[Main Host]

No, no. Or Himmler. Does this. Does this remind you of anything? No, you stop. Hey. Or you need goggles to come pay you. That's a rumor. Stop it. That's a rumor. Just takes the bait every time. The Jew like, oh, God, I'm not a lady.

[Co-host Gerald]

Weren't they like doing trans experimental surgeries on people too?

[Main Host]

All kinds of weird stuff. Yeah. By the way, this was all leading up to, I should tell you, the championship event at the anti ice protest. The pin the dick on the tranny. Yeah. Which I will say I'm on board with that one. Ah, yeah.

[Co-host Gerald]

That looks like it is too.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Surgery.

[Main Host]

Ouch.

[Co-host Gerald]

We should play that here.

[Main Host]

Just like. You know what, here's the thing. Just whenever you see some. Whenever you see the next ice lady get, you know, get shot because she's trying to run a police officer over with her car or someone assaulting off. Just remember how you. When you watch this. And you know that deep down, of course I mean figuratively, like, can't someone just hit them with an suv? Here they are using the dildos later on. Yes. A bunch of white privileged socialists throwing rubber penises at black police officers. That'll show them a black ice agent.

[Co-host Gerald]

Black Nazis you know, this was funnier

[Co-host or Panelist]

when you throw them at the WNBA games.

[Co-host Gerald]

All these people obsessed with sex and nobody wants to have it with them.

[Main Host]

Want to get aids, by the way, just for reference, those are the Bolsheviks. Just to keep in mind, we're going to get to it. There are still Bolsheviks around. Did you guys know that? They're still around. Wherever the left exists, you get modern Bolsheviks. Yeah. Anything else? We want to kill those. Of course they would have been executed by the Bolsheviks once the revolution took place, but they'd be useful idiots for the beginning. Yeah, Just like intelligentsia.

[Co-host or Panelist]

They have dildos to throw. They threw coal.

[Main Host]

Yeah.

[Co-host or Panelist]

It was a long time ago.

[Main Host]

I mean, I don't know if they had dildos back then. It was probably just some kind of an apparatus, piece of wood, a cucumber.

[Co-host or Panelist]

I don't know.

[Main Host]

They would take pirates.

[Co-host Gerald]

Peg leg, still doing.

[Main Host]

Well, the Egyptians did have that. The Egyptians did really what? They created those apparatuses and then actually would create these long apparati that would be somewhat. They would have slits in them so that they could hom into them and it would act as a vibration device.

[Co-host Gerald]

That's right.

[Pope Leo (quoted)]

They also.

[Main Host]

This is true though.

[Co-host Gerald]

And they also made batteries. The Egyptians first make batteries.

[Main Host]

Talking about the.

[Co-host Gerald]

I forget what it's called. It's the something battery.

[Main Host]

Ah, yeah.

[Co-host Gerald]

They.

[Main Host]

Well, I need quite a bit more to go on.

[Co-host Gerald]

They made batteries and light bulbs.

[Main Host]

Yeah.

[Co-host Gerald]

So they can make it. They can make it light up.

[Co-host or Panelist]

We had momentum for a minute and then it's gone.

[Co-host Gerald]

No, we still have momentum. This is totally a real thing.

[Main Host]

No science. I know some people talked about how the pyramids might have been used to generate electrical current.

[Co-host Gerald]

Yeah, it's a power plant.

[Main Host]

Okay. All right.

[Co-host Gerald]

Yeah, it's a giant power plant to help map the world for the Baghdad.

[Co-host or Panelist]

True.

[Main Host]

Now it explains why.

[Co-host Gerald]

The Baghdad Battery.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Thank you.

[Main Host]

The Baghdad Battery. What?

[Co-host Gerald]

Yeah, it's a real thing. They were able to make batteries and store energy.

[Main Host]

Okay.

[Co-host Gerald]

Yeah, they found it at a dig.

[Main Host]

I don't believe it.

[Co-host or Panelist]

All right. No, moving on that thing.

[Main Host]

Neat. Yeah, yeah.

[Co-host Gerald]

See, that's what, that's what powered ancient

[Main Host]

vibrators

[Co-host Gerald]

before the D cell.

[Main Host]

And, And Cleopatra, she would just. She would have a gourd and fit bees in there. Did you know that she would use that? Really? Really. That was the old, let's just be honest, Cleopatra. When people try and point to history for a strong woman, they pick an opium whore. That's who they're picking with Cleopatra, who basically created the, you know, the old school hitachi wand where she put bees into a gourd.

[Co-host or Panelist]

And.

[Main Host]

That's.

[Co-host Gerald]

That's kind of awesome. Although she did run one of the greatest empires in history to the ground.

[Main Host]

Well, yes, she didn't really run it. It was like her four year old brother. All right. Right.

[Co-host Gerald]

But she was married to him.

[Main Host]

We digress. So I guess you want to keep going. No, I don't. How to spot a conservative woman according to buzzfeed. So I saw this article, I was like, okay, who's writing this? And I realized it's a black guy. And then I realized all the things that they write are meant to be like, negative. So actually, I wish we had this thinger that we're saying the same thing now that I think about it.

[Co-host Gerald]

Let's talk about vibrators.

[Main Host]

Give me a second.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Yeah, well.

[Co-host Gerald]

How to spot a conservative woman. She doesn't have a gourd full of bees.

[Co-host or Panelist]

There you go.

[Main Host]

Well, or she doesn't protest ice with a bunch of dildos and she still likes men.

[Co-host Gerald]

Yeah, she's doing things that mean something.

[Main Host]

You got that? Anyway, sting me. All right, so hold on a second. I'll set this up. There we go. Okay, guys, guys, we're all gonna. All right, let's get this on track. How to Spot a Conservative Woman was an art article written on BuzzFeed. And I thought, hey, who's writing this? Turns out it was a black guy. In this week's installment, if we're saying the same thing, we're saying the same thing. We're all saying the same thing.

[Co-host Gerald]

I said the exact same thing.

[Main Host]

So check the references as we provide every day weekdays, 11am Eastern. So they want you to identify the secret signs that a woman may be conservative. Now keep in mind, this is written by seemingly a black guy, I don't know, fully black. It's just the name minority guy.

[Co-host Gerald]

It's a he him.

[Main Host]

It's a he him. And they want you to view this negatively. And then we're going to get into the concept of synonyms and antonyms at the end of this. So I want you to read this and just kind of put yourself in the headspace of those who are agreeing with this article. How to spot a conservative woman, which is a bad thing. And these are some secret signs. So some tips in there from a. If you want to take relationship advice. A 40 year old non binary person from Texas wrote, women who are conservative tend to be cagey around answering how they voted or say they are, quote, not very political and feign being moderate. Honestly, all Conservative folks can have a tendency to do this if they think their honest answer won't be well received. Yeah, yeah. You know, that's very interesting that you say that. I've said this for a long time. If someone in Hollywood says, I don't want to discuss politics or that's not my role, it means they most likely lean right. Because it's only a net benefit in the monolith that is Hollywood to speak out as a leftist. This also tells you when he goes, may not be well received. It's true. Conservatives will keep it to themselves if they believe that they are in the presence of someone who may answer or react violently.

[Co-host Gerald]

Yeah, they want to, you know, keep their skin, keep their jobs, you know,

[Main Host]

they want their skin on them not to become your suit.

[Co-host Gerald]

Right.

[Main Host]

Might be poorly received. And women try to be more agreeable. That's the problem. Women try to be more agreeable and so they'll probably keep it to themselves. 29 year old woman from Salt Lake City wrote, if a woman doesn't like the Barbie movie or Taylor Swift, ask why this is great, that this is how you're screening for fundamental values.

[Co-host Gerald]

Why the hell are we like Taylor Swift?

[Main Host]

Yeah. Because I don't. Because I'm like a huge portion of population Earth. How about that? Usually that will give you your answer. It's okay to have different tastes. Well, thank you. Mighty gracious of you. But if the reason you don't like them is specifically that they are overtly feminist or for women and girls, then we have a problem. So this must be a lesbian, right? From Salt Lake City.

[Co-host or Panelist]

It's gotta be a lesbian.

[Co-host Gerald]

So this is. It's a problem.

[Main Host]

Yeah, it's a problem.

[Co-host Gerald]

If you're a conservative woman. Then we have a. It's not like how to spot one, it's how to spot the problem.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Yeah. Yes.

[Co-host Gerald]

And how to. What are they gonna do next, exterminate it?

[Co-host or Panelist]

Actually, not liking feminism is great.

[Main Host]

Well, again, but not from BuzzFeed. You have to understand from their perspective, these are. These are cardinal sins. Someone who was anonymous wrote if she gives girls smaller servings of food than she gives to the boys. First off, I don't know that that happens. Does she could just be keeping it for herself. Let's be honest. That's one of. Yeah. Thank you, Tool Man. Yeah. What's wrong with me?

[Co-host Gerald]

Yeah, they're not giving her enough, huh?

[Co-host or Panelist]

Don't worry, she'll take.

[Main Host]

Where does this happen now? Are the girls smaller? Are the girls younger? Do they eat less? I have a twin Twin boy, Twin girl. My son eats more. I know it's a crazy notion. He eats more. And so I tend to give him larger portions because I try not to give them a portion that they can't finish. You know, with kids it seems insurmountable and I just look at it and move it around so I give them what I know they will finish. And then potentially second helping, she gets a slightly smaller portion because she almost never finishes it anyway. Oh, this is the part where we ignore biology. Got it. That's the through line here. Ignore biology. Let's just call innate human characteristics. Let's just call it a warning sign or a red flag. Here's another hot take. A 63 year old man from Oregon. A 63 year old man from Oregon is giving a tip on buzzfeed on how to spot conservative women. Think about this for a second. He still uses AOL.

[Co-host Gerald]

Yeah, my mom is a 60, almost 63 year old woman and she doesn't know what BuzzFeed is.

[Main Host]

Yeah, it's just everything about that phrase is wrong. If this is where you are going for advice. He wrote this. He wrote one. Red flag is when you get in their car with them and when they turn it on, there's an AM talk show with Michael Savage or Sean Hannity on the radio. That's not a red flag. That's not a red flag. It's not. And by the way, it's not secret. It just means they listen to that. That's their political persuasion. Like these people act like they're cracking a code, like they're Colombo. Like that wouldn't be Sean Hannity on the radio, would it?

[Co-host or Panelist]

I don't listen to that.

[Main Host]

No. He said my ex would usually turn it off and say something like, I listened to NPR too, but the reality is I never heard NPR on her radio. Here's the thing too, let's again go along with this logic. NPR, I believe, was 92% of employees at NPR, I'm going by rote here, donated directly and exclusively to the Democratic Party. 92%. They receive a lot of their funding, obviously federally. And NPR leans incredibly left. Would they have a problem if someone exclusively listened to npr? And do you think that NPR is somehow less biased on the left than AM radio is on the right for most people? Do you think that Ms. Now or CNN is less biased toward the left than Fox News is toward the right? Like you think Blue sky is less biased on the left than X would be on the right? And by the way, by bias, I mean just Everyone is free to post. This is what they use as their, as their logic. If the problem was, I hope that I have someone who's politically educated, so I hope they're actually absorbing information from all sides like we do. The references we provide tend to be left leaning because we don't want you to be in an echo chamber. That's not what the left wants. The left, if you look at this advice, the first one is they might keep it quiet if they know it'll be ill received. They want to silence and suppress anyone who doesn't share their point of view. They shoot, they kill, they maim, they run over with cars. They want to suppress information that they don't agree with. It's not about collecting information from as many resources as possible to make the best inference you can. They just don't want half of this country to exist. 48 year old man from Texas wrote, sometimes a sign is if she says she loves, quote, masculine men.

[Co-host Gerald]

Well, I guess we found the twink.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Yeah.

[Main Host]

And no one at buzzfeed just said, hold on a second. This may not be good advice. In other words, we may not want to tar and feather all women who like men who are masculine. Because I don't know if you guys know this. I know this might be surprising to you. All women, since the beginning of time, have tended to prefer men being masculine. But that's the quiet part out loud, isn't it?

[Co-host Gerald]

It's intentional. This is. This is not, you know, it's not what it seems. This is a guidebook. This is a. Hey, ladies, just so you know, if you listen to AM radio, we will judge you and we will not be with you if, you know, if you like masculine men, let's go.

[Main Host]

Okay, so masculine men, a synonym for that would just be once upon a time men. But let's. Let's go the antonym route. Okay, so then if they're saying masculine men, right, this is a red flag. This is a warning sign. If a woman likes masculine men, according to Buzzfee, that's a red flag. All right, so that's bad. So then the positive, right, an antonym to masculine men would be feminine men. And that's the point. There is no LGBTQAAIP without feminism. It's all part of this unholy mutation doing away with the idea of men and women. Why? Because they're Marxists and they hate the nuclear family and they hate strong communities because stronger communities are more difficult to control. I'm not. This isn't a logical leap. Someone who says I think it's a problem for a woman to like masculine men. That's someone who doesn't want relationships to be reproductive in nature. It's that simple. It's evil. It truly is evil. It is a perversion of the natural in all facets. And sometimes you do the masculine thing and try and reward a friend. To be clear, masculinity is not always a. It's not always an endeavor that's thanked. Try and maybe reward a friend, a male friend, only to be shut down. Hey, Nick.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Sorry to hug you.

[Co-host Gerald]

I just want to say I really like that thing you said about the Red Sox on your show the other day. I want to show my appreciation with a little tip.

[Narrator or News Reader]

Was it a check?

[Main Host]

Yeah. My fucking Western Union. I don't even think my bank takes check anymore. Now I'm gonna have to go to the Walmart Money Center. I'll get hit with more fees and actual money than I'll receive three bucks. Three bucks of this and buy two bucks. Am I supposed to get like a half a Big Mac with this? I guess if they a six the middle bun, I could save a little money.

[Narrator or News Reader]

Get the out of here.

[Main Host]

Josh.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Come on.

[Main Host]

Good hands.

[Co-host Gerald]

Thanks.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Told you should use Rumble Wallet to tip him.

[Co-host Gerald]

I know, I know. It's a non custodial wallet with end to end encryption that allows me to tip my favorite content creators quickly and securely. I don't know, I just thought like a check was more personal, you know. Look, it's got my address on it.

[Co-host or Panelist]

You're a moron.

[Main Host]

Seriously. Download the Rumble Wallet and step away from big banks for good. No fees, no middlemen. None of the crap you have to deal with where you go in and they say you have some concierge account, but it's some guy who wants to tell you about Bitcoin and he's doing mining. Lyle, go to wallet.rumble.com today and you can also support your favorite creators. Step away from big banks. Rumble Wallet. Wait, that's my address. That's my check. Josh, how did you get my check? Put. Josh.

[Guest or Contributor with controversial views]

Josh. Josh.

[Main Host]

All right. Now we're gonna wade right into it.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Let's do it.

[Main Host]

Thank you for the raid everyone. Welcome to the show. We're glad to have you. Very much appreciate the lineup on Rumble has been. It's been a great thing to send people on down the line and help some medium creators along the trail. So President Trump and the Pope and I will for the sake of this discussion include those high up in the Vatican in positions of authority as well. Let me ask you, who do you agree with on this one? Not do you like the personal commentary, or do you think that it was appropriate for Donald Trump to post what he posted on Truth or using that venue? But I think we are at the point now where we can very clearly see a contrast. I want you to take your, I want you to take your personal religious lens off of this, and I just want you to look at this through a political one, a national policy one, as a conservative, as a MAGA person, America first, nationalist, whatever you want to call it. You want open borders or do you believe in strong borders? Do you support deportations of illegal aliens, or do you think that's cruel? Do you support a bigger welfare state, or do you think we need to be more fiscally responsible? Where do you line up on these fundamental issues? Do you think that we should be tolerant of Islam and welcoming, or do you think that maybe it's run its course as far as Western tolerance being used against us? Do you think it's a good thing that President Trump spoke out against genocide and certain African nations, or do you think that it's just kind of the equivalent there? Whether they're Muslim, whether they're Christian, it's just, it's all the same and we should help all people. I think now you do have to decide where you line up on this argument. Then hopefully it can be a fruitful and productive argument. So let me start this off with right now, what is going on between the Pope and President Trump. And then I want to go back a little bit because this is a long time coming, the history and the disagreements therein. So obviously, you know, Monday, President Trump criticized Pope Leo for being weak on crime, bad on foreign policy. Here you go.

[Narrator or News Reader]

We don't like it. We don't like a pope that's going to say that it's okay to have a nuclear weapon. We don't want a pope that says crime is okay in our city. I don't like it. I'm not a big fan of Pope Leo. He's a very liberal person and he's a man that doesn't believe in stopping crime. He's a man that doesn't. I think that we should be toying with a country that wants a nuclear weapon so they can blow up the world. I'm not a fan of Pope Leo.

[Main Host]

Obviously, for those who've been following us, Pope Leo responded while on his way to Algeria, a good place to vacation. If you're looking for recommendations.

[Pope Leo (quoted)]

I do not look at my role as being Political or politician. I don't want to get into a debate with him. And I will continue to speak out loudly against war looking to promote peace. I have no fear, neither the Trump administration nor speaking out loudly about the

[Main Host]

message in the gospel.

[Pope Leo (quoted)]

And that's what I believe I am called to do, what the church is called to do. If we're not politicians, we're not looking to make foreign policies.

[Main Host]

The issue is that he did reach out and speak on foreign policy, and not only that, he also has spoken on domestic policy. If he believes what he says there, then there's no world in which it's appropriate for him to condemn our deportation policies or our strengthening our border policies. But he did. And my issue here is, of course, not at all with Catholics. And I get that some Catholics may find themselves in an awkward position. You let me know if you're Catholic. Comment below because you don't want to speak poorly of the pope. And he may be. He may be, by the way, and very likely is, a very decent man who's simply wrong. He would be just as wrong as AOC on immigration policy, or, let's go more moderate, just as wrong as George W. Bush, Paul Ryan on immigration policy. That's okay. And it's not trashing the Catholic Church to say that. And I had quite a bit prepared for this, but I figured that the most effective way to highlight this, because I know sometimes people will shut off if it's their thing and they feel offended, is just to give you a side by side. This is a long time coming. This president, the one who many of you elected, and the maga, the America first, the right wing, the conservative movement, has been in diametric opposition policy wise to the Pope, this current Pope and the current Vatican on nearly all fundamental issues. It's an abominable regime and it should be removed.

[Pope Leo (quoted)]

But this is a war of choice.

[Guest or Contributor]

We do have some work to do with Iran. They can't have a nuclear weapon. It's very simple. They can't have. You can't have peace in the Middle east if they have a nuclear weapon.

[Pope Leo (quoted)]

If people are in the United States illegally, there are ways to treat that. There are courts, there's a system of justice. But when people are living good lives, and many of them for 10, 15, 20 years, to treat them in a way that is extremely difficult, disrespectful to say the least. And there's been some violence, unfortunately. I think that the bishops have been very clear in what they said.

[Aura Advertiser]

Is it your plan to deport everyone who is here illegally over the next four years.

[Guest or Contributor]

Well, I think you have to do it. And it's a. It's a very tough thing to do. You know, you have rules, regulations, laws.

[Main Host]

They came in illegally for security zones separating us from our neighbors for the exclusionary mindset that, tragically, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms.

[Guest or Contributor]

They're coming in illegally. Drugs are pouring in through the border. We have no country if we have no border.

[Main Host]

Communion between Christians and Muslims takes shape under the mantle of Our lady of Africa. Here in Algeria, the maternal love of Lala Maryam gathers everyone as children within our rich diversity in our shared aspiration for dignity, love, justice and peace. In a world where division and wars sow pain and death, living in unity and peace is a compelling sign. ApostolicJourney.

[Co-host Gerald]

For the first time in its history, the Vatican has set aside a prayer room for Muslims.

[Main Host]

Inside the Apostolic Library.

[Guest or Contributor]

All nations must stand together against the evil forces of radical Islamic terrorism.

[Pope Leo (quoted)]

The creation is crying out in floods, droughts, storms, and relentless heat. One in three people live in great vulnerability because of these climate changes.

[Guest or Contributor]

Climate change, because if it goes higher or lower, whatever the hell happens, there's climate change. It's the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world, in my opinion.

[Co-host Gerald]

In his first major document, Pope Leo dove right into poverty, saying, God has a special place in his heart for those who are poor, oppressed and discriminated against. In a continuation of the teaching of Pope Francis, the Chicago native denounced an economy that kills and dramatic imbalances of wealth.

[Guest or Contributor]

The USA is the economic engine on the planet, and when America booms, the entire world booms.

[Main Host]

And you can check out all the references as we provide every show. 11:00am Eastern on weekdays. Let me just ask you this. Were you happy to hear that Donald Trump withdrew when it happened? President Trump, is it what you voted for when he said, no, we're not going to do the. The Paris climate agreement? We're not going to do that. We're not going to reduce our own energy use and skyrocket the costs so that China can screw this all up and not actually take part anyway? Were you happy then? I was. And I know that deportations or apprehensions have gone down a little bit this month. I'm disappointed in that. But when I saw deportations increase and I saw border crossings go down to the tune of 96 to 99%. Is that what you voted for? It's what I voted for. I was happy with that. When you're talking about any of these other issues as it relates to, for example, let's talk about foreign policy. Let's talk about foreign policy as it relates to poverty, because that's an important one. He says God has a special place in his heart for the poor, the oppressed, the discriminated against. Well, certainly the oppressed and the discriminated against. And if that's the reason that they are poor, God, if we all serve the God of the Bible, the Christian God of the Bible, God also has a very special prescription for people who are poor because they are lazy and recognizes that that's a significant portion of it, not all of them. What is it? Is it praise or is it condemnation? Is it called out specifically? And if he wants to discuss poverty, why does he consistently go after. Meaning the Pope, the country that has brought more people out of poverty than any throughout all of human history and has more class mobility than any country on earth right now. Yes. That includes even those European nations that you love to point to on a regular basis that have the population of Rhode island and entirely homogenous. Yes. More class mobility here. What has thrust more people into poverty than communism, than Marxism. How much of a discussion is there centering around that? Matter of fact, I don't know that there's anything this pope seems to enjoy discussing more or has more of a proclivity to address than American policy specifically. Is that what you voted for, Donald Trump? Because this is what I voted for. I didn't vote for this pope.

[Co-host Gerald]

It almost seems like the cardinals who did vote for him voted for an American so that they could have an American, you know, talking head.

[Main Host]

Yeah.

[Co-host Gerald]

Saying the things that they wanted to say from the Vatican.

[Main Host]

Yeah. We shouldn't, you know, there's a system. He says on. It's also just uninformed, by the way, the Pope. I'm just going to say that politically. I'm not talking about theologically or in issues of the gospel. Politically is about as dumb as a writer from BuzzFeed. I mean that. Well, the thing is with illegal immigration, there's a system and there's a justice system. Yeah. It didn't work. People skipped out and didn't show up and they were given carte blanche. And one party in this country wanted to create an entire new class of voters purchasing them on your dime. The American worker. There's a system. Great. There is right now. Hey, Pope, $2,600, all expenses paid. Come back the right way right now. CBP1 app.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Yeah.

[Main Host]

The other thing that I notice is they say, well, of course something should be done of course this regime is terrible in Iran and they should be removed. But no war is ever, right?

[Co-host or Panelist]

Yeah, but how do you remove.

[Main Host]

How do you remove. Whether you agree. And that's one where. Maybe you agree with this post, maybe you agree with this pope over Donald Trump on Iran. And I know that there are people on both sides that I think reasonable arguments to be made on both sides of that issue. Not if you claim to be conservative or America first on immigration, on taxes on the border. I also haven't seen. I haven't seen him speak out, particularly against the evils of feminism and LGBTQ and the destruction of the nuclear family in the same way. Not with the same zeal. Islam. Yeah. A designated prayer room for visitors. Can Christians. Can someone fact check me? Can Christians. Are they allowed to go to Mecca now?

[Co-host Gerald]

I think you're allowed to kiss the black rock, the black square.

[Main Host]

Yeah. If you're not.

[Co-host or Panelist]

I don't think so. I don't think they have a designated prayer room there. So just in the Vatican, they have a designated prayer room for Muslims.

[Main Host]

Right.

[Co-host or Panelist]

That are visiting scholars. There's this weird alliance and I. I just seem to remember something about truth dividing. I didn't come to bring peace, but a sword. The truth is going to divide us and you're going to tell me that. I guess Vatican II is what really ushered this in, that the God of Islam and the God of the Bible are the same God. They're not. The attributes are completely different. Doesn't make any sense to me. Why this alliance, especially making these comments in Algeria. Why?

[Main Host]

For people who are complaining about the fall, for example, Hungary, Viktor Orban, by the way, losing to someone who's to the right of him on immigration and on some social issues and more moderate on some other issues, certainly as it relates to the international community. Where's the outrage here about someone pumping the message of globalism ad nauseam? That's what this pope does when he talks about climate change. He's talking about international treaties with godless heathen nations. Secular humanists who think that they can fix the world by getting rid of people. You know the reason that we have a birth rate problem, Right. The primary reason. There are other contributing factors. The left will tell you, how could you bring a child into this world when overpopulation is a problem? We grew up with that nonstop climate change. We have to curb the population. Remember Bill Burr even had a bit about that. Right. Just using sort of an uneducated rube on these issues is a good sort of bellwether. He Goes, no one wants to address this issue. Right. Because no one wants to admit that, like, half of us just have to walk off into the ocean. People believe that for a long time, and now we're facing the crisis of not actually replacing our populations. So for someone like that who comes from a religion, a worldview of be fruitful and multiply to the point that they are, you know, quite adamant, quite adamantly against contraception in comparison to other dominations, how do you buy into the internationalist agenda of climate change, which was predicated on the idea that there are too many human beings on this planet? I gotta tell you, not seeing the fruits of the spirit there. Or it could just be a lack of education, but that's my report, Captain. Anyone else want to take a crack at it? Because I know, I know. It's like, oh, we know. We're gonna. This is not anti Catholic. It's anti political positions of this Pope Gerald was saying.

[Co-host Gerald]

I don't know why he would say that. In Algeria, it's illegal to. I can't proselytize.

[Main Host]

Yeah, yeah.

[Co-host Gerald]

I always want to say prostitute. Yeah, I mean, proselytize. That's probably illegal too.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Yeah, we can't do either one.

[Co-host Gerald]

He can't do that in Algeria. It is. It's a crime. So, you know, you go there for whatever reason, you have to be respectful and you can't say, oh, Islam sucks, and you guys are terrifying.

[Main Host]

Well, the issue too, with the Pope, I will say. Well, Gerald, you were about to say something.

[Co-host or Panelist]

I was going to say, how does Islam treat Jesus? Pull the tweet up from Tucker Carlson real quick. I guess this just came out from Tucker. Just the top part. The people in charge don't want you to know this, but Muslims love Jesus.

[Main Host]

Pause. Before we get to anything else, before we get to anything else, do they believe Jesus was divine? He died on the cross and rose from the dead?

[Co-host or Panelist]

No.

[Main Host]

They say that never happened. No. Okay, you're a Christian.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Was Jesus the son of God in Islam?

[Main Host]

No, but it's as simple as this. They love Jesus. Someone says, I love Jesus, and they go, but he wasn't crucified and he didn't. Who didn't rise from the dead? How would you refer to that? A Christian? No, someone who loves Jesus. Okay, just apply the same standard to Islam, but continue. But nothing else needs to be addressed. But let's continue.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Exactly. No, that's exactly the point. The question in did he write, was he divine? He claimed it. You can't have him be a prophet. We've gone through this before. I don't want to go down this road. But like that, this weird alliance where the Catholic Church is trying to do this and people, they don't want to tell you that Muslims love Jesus.

[Main Host]

Yeah.

[Co-host or Panelist]

They completely deny his divinity, which is completely antithetical to Christianity. So I don't care what they think about him outside of that. Fine. They think he's a prophet that's subservient in their religion. Okay, fantastic. What does that mean to us as Christians? I'm not going to go fight him necessarily for that. But we are not the same. Stop it. We are not the same.

[Main Host]

You could easily prove this, by the way. You could easily prove this. They love Jesus. Go to an Islamic country, a country under Islamic rule. And very publicly in the town square. Respectfully, respectfully. You can have a megaphone or not. Your choice. Respectfully. Say Muhammad was wrong. Jesus is divine. He did rise from the dead three days later. And he is the only way, the truth and the light. No one gets to the Father except through him. And to deny the divinity of Christ is to accept the hellfires that are inevitable. Just go and say that Muhammad was wrong. Jesus was divine, was crucified, and he rose three days later. Muhammad is wrong about this and you need to follow the divine. And Muhammad can be an auxiliary prophet if you think he had some good teachings. But the divine is Jesus Christ. Right? Jesus lovers, you say as they behead you

[Co-host Gerald]

straight to jail in Algeria.

[Main Host]

I can't say test it. Do you think the people saying this don't know that? I can tell. This is exactly the kind of propaganda I was getting at the, at the Muslim Club, the college, I think it was Islamic College association where they were handing out Qurans. And the first thing they said was, and just so you know, we believe in Jesus. I said, oh really? Well what do you believe about Jesus? I said that he was a great prophet. I said, uh huh. But that's not the primary defining characteristic of Jesus because there are a lot of prophets, by the way. And as Christians, we also believe there are prophets before Jesus, but we don't follow them as our savior. That's why it's called Christianity. So was he divine? Well, no. Well, we don't believe it was a prophet. We believe that he was Son of God. God in the flesh, Father, Son, Holy Spirit. Do you guys, where do you guys line up on the Holy Trinity? I remember this. And it tripped them up. Well, okay, I guess we disagree. So we disagree on the foundation of our faith. And it's even worse than that because Islam subverts it and says, by the way, you can't trust any of the texts, the Old Testament or New Testament, because the people of the Book lied about it. But I'm here to correct it. Yeah.

[Co-host or Panelist]

By the way, according to Islam, Jesus should be stoned.

[Main Host]

Mm.

[Co-host or Panelist]

He's a prophet. Right. What was the penalty for a prophet prophesying something that didn't happen in the Old Testament? They were stoned. Don't worry about the divinity argument for a second, just in case they want to sidestep that and say Jesus never claimed that. Did he say he was going to be killed and rise again three days later? If he swooned on the cross and faked it or didn't rise again three days later for any reason, he lied and should be stoned.

[Main Host]

Well, they just say that's the text. Where?

[Co-host or Panelist]

Doesn't matter. Doesn't matter.

[Main Host]

Any of the texts, the Jews, early

[Co-host or Panelist]

Christians, they just say, he swooned on the cross, he didn't actually die. They don't ever address the claim where Jesus said he would do that. This generation isn't going to get a sign. You're going to get the sign of Jonah.

[Main Host]

Guys, I will tell you this. Beyond the infighting, beyond the horseshoe, right? If Christians let Islam in the door and say, we're all the same, it's done. You lose your country, the fight is lost. It's that important. Just so you understand, anyone who tells you we are all the same. And actually, did you know, like, some kind of Saturday morning special, did you know that Muslims. Yeah, I know everything that Muslims. Not everything, but I know what Muslims

[Co-host Gerald]

20 years ago replace the more, you know, music with, like, the call to prayer.

[Narrator or News Reader]

Yeah,

[Co-host Gerald]

yeah, but it's

[Main Host]

Levar Burton, but you don't have to take my word for it. No. Because I'm not allowed to speak. It's all lost. If you allow Islam to get a foothold here, it is all lost. And I don't mean secular Muslims or moderate Muslims in the United States. No, I mean, if you allow Christianity to be diluted with Islam as though we are one and the same or close enough, you might as well just register as a Democrat for the rest of your life and you might as well call yourself a Bolshevik, like many Democrats do in their quiet time. And there's a lack of transparency. I noticed, too. Same thing with the Pope. He never has to answer for it.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Yeah, nobody gets to call him out.

[Main Host]

The people out there who put these things on social media, we just mentioned Tucker, he doesn't have to answer for it. He's not going to answer to someone who goes, well, do they deny the divine? That's a really simple question, right? Well, I don't know if they deny the divine. Well, I do. The Pope isn't going to answer for it. You know, it would be great if the Pope actually, if he ever just sat down and had a conversation with someone who doesn't even have to be. I mean, it doesn't have to be George Will or Charles Krauthammer, God rest his soul. It could be anyone who's moderately educated on the border. Yeah, but you understand that it costs the taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars and you understand that there's a crime issue and you understand that Americans are struggling and it's actually not our duty to simply let anyone into this country who wants to. He never has to answer for those questions. And say what you want about President Trump. He may answer ineloquently, but he is constantly answering the press. I certainly would take, what are you, New York Times fake news over silence? Don't follow someone who doesn't get into the fight ever, ever. That's the trend that I'm seeing. And it is all lost. It is all lost. If we just say, yeah, Christianity, Islam, basically the same thing.

[Co-host Gerald]

The Pope being weak on border security is crazy because God has the best border, effectively.

[Main Host]

Yeah, yeah.

[Co-host Gerald]

It's either in heaven or literally burning for eternity in hell.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Yeah.

[Main Host]

There's literally a guest list and gates,

[Co-host Gerald]

the Catholics believe in a waiting room or whatever, lobby, so to speak, the study. But doorman will come get you. Yeah.

[Co-host or Panelist]

I don't know if your name's on the list.

[Main Host]

And I also would say if they don't get into the fight, also transparency. If someone says, you know, they believe they love Jesus. Oh, really? What's your basis for that? If someone doesn't give you an answer, and especially if it's theology needs to be scripturally based, if it's policy, it does need to be factually based, data based. There's a real lack of transparency, which I thought would go the other way. If you were to ask youngme in 2008, 2009, you know, starting with a blue bed sheet on YouTube, we're saying we can sort of, we can circumvent the gatekeepers and we'll be able to get the information directly to people. But now it's not just a culture of censorship, as we used to see in legacy media or mainstream media. It's a culture of self Censorship. The FCC used to say, you can't say poop. You can't say something scatological. Yeah. If it really you could say, ah, crap. What you can't say is the guy took a crap. All these. But you kind of had these rules in a game of cat and mouse. Now it's a culture of self censorship. And at one point that was cancel culture. Now that's the algorithm, that's the clickbait, where you might as well be canceled if you don't just feed the beast with something new and something novel, regardless of how truthful. As a matter of fact, you're punished for being transparent. Here's what I mean by that. If you're being transparent and you provide the references, the data, the evidence, it's never going to be as sensational. Sometimes I don't want to say never. It's rarely ever going to be as sensational as a claim that can be made without substantiation. So it's actually a net negative for people looking to pursue clicks, looking to pursue traffic, to pursue a policy of consistent transparency. Case in point. I mean, it's a good time to. The only other company that I've created that I run, foundation, you can go to foundationdaily.com it's a multivitamin and I've been taking this stuff for years. And you see all these fitness influencer trends out there, right? They go, how did I get ripped? Transparency would be trend balloon. And instead they go, I drank this tea or I took this pill. Right. It's actually a net negative to be transparent because people will know that you are full of crap. If you have a perfect diet, you know what, maybe you don't need it. But if you want to cover your bases, you want a foundation. You also have clinical doses of clinical ingredients like turmeric curcumin in there, garlic for heart health, for blood pressure, for inflammation. It's all in one, one pill that you can take. Well, you take several pills, but one bottle every day. And it's lab tested where you can actually go and see the results for yourself. FoundationDaily.com you get 50% off your subscription. Wanted to create a company now through Wednesday special.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Normally it's 40% off.

[Main Host]

We wanted to create a company just like this show where we provide the references. There you go. Lab tests available. There you go. Everything on the list, on the ingredient list is exactly what you get. We don't make grandiose claims, we don't make false claims. But you can actually, on the website, look at the clinical research and the results they're in be a lot easier, right? In other words I could say curcumin turmeric in this. I'm just using this as an example. I know this is a plug but it's a perfect, perfect chance to do it. Turmeric, curcumin, very studied supplement. Outside of creatine, probably one of the most studied ever. The anti inflammatory effects are about comparable to Advil if you take it daily without some of the negative side amounts. Yeah, in the right amounts. Now I provide that that on the website I could tell you as many people who are social influencers, guys I took this thing and all my pain is gone. I, I wouldn't be incentivized. As a matter of fact it would be a self defeating argument to say that and provide you with a reference that said 15 to 24% reduction in inflammation and pain. The truth is helpful but the truth is very rarely sensational. So that's why we [e-mail] the R B tour starring Usher Raymond and Chris Brown. Uniting two of R B's defining hitmakers, Chris Brown and Usher Raymond. Sign up for artist presale access at raymond and brown tour.com.

[Co-host Gerald]

you didn't start a business just to keep the lights on. You're here to sell more today than yesterday. You're here to win. Lucky for you, Shopify built the best converting checkout on the planet. Like the just one tapping ridiculously fast acting sky high sales stacking champion at checkouts. That's the good stuff right there. So if your business is in it to win it, win with Shopify. Start your free trial [e-mail] win and

[Main Host]

let's go on to the next one where we've seen some sensationalism. The Bolshevik Revolution. Let me ask you this, how familiar are you with the Bolsheviks? Revolutionary Russia, which of course paved the way, yet Lenin paved the way for Stalin. I have consistently discussed and maintained that it's very bizarre that this is not discussed at large. That we learn about World War II and Hitler. Bad. To be clear, Hitler was bad. But we very rarely learn in school. I never learned in school about Mao.

[Co-host Gerald]

I learned almost nothing about Russian involvement.

[Main Host]

Yeah, Mao, Stalin.

[Co-host Gerald]

Yeah.

[Main Host]

None of it. Why? Well, now some people are asking those same questions, only they're providing you with answers that are verifiably wrong. But for the record, this is something we've discussed here for a very long time. Stalin. A lot of people we asked, they were not familiar with Stalin at all. And of Course, that's interesting because Stalin, Hitler, same period of time, Stalin certainly killed more people. But if you spend all of this time learning about Adolf Hitler in school, you would think that you would learn just as much about Stalin. We kind of skimmed over Stalin, so they always compare to Hitler. But not only is barely any attention given to these other horrible dictators who, by the way, cost many more lives, we'll get to that. Communism, socialism, they have to be careful. We hear a lot about Adolf Hitler and we don't hear a lot about other people who I would argue are architects. Not only just as bad, but historically, equally, if not more significant. People like Stalin, people like Mao. Pol Pot, I think, is the worst. As a matter of fact, we did a series the Great Diktov dictators throughout history. The purpose of that was to highlight that every single one of them, with the exception of maybe Pinochet. And the left would argue Hitler. Far, far left. I think the winner was Mao. It might have been Pol Pot, because Pol Pot was a greater percentage. So we've been covering this for a long time. You can go back and look at old videos that cover the A to Z on Karl Marx. I believe we either did Trotsky or Lenin. But today I want to specifically address the Bolshevik Revolution because some people have just recently discovered it. Now, first let me concede it is true in the Bolshevik Revolution, there was a disproportionate percentage of Jews in positions of leadership early on. Okay, I'll get into the context as to why that is the case. But anyone who uses the term Bolshevik Jew interchangeably is uneducated or lying to you, and here's why that matters. Please, just listen to this. Hear me out. Go check the references. There are still Bolsheviks today. They still want the same things. And if you misidentify the drivers, the motivators or the threats, well, then you'll let the wolves in the door, like Islam or link arms with the modern Democrat Party, who, by the way, is an extension of Bolshevism. Still a statue of Lenin right now, 16ft high in the United States. We'll get to that. Where do you think it is? Who do you think supports it? This brings us to right now, people new to this Internet, intellectuals, however you want to refer to them. Bolshevism is synonymous with Jewishness in Russia.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Like millions and millions of Christians were being exterminated by the Bolshevik Jews up there.

[Main Host]

The funny thing is the Bolsheviks were everything that they told you the Nazis were. And they had proven it. They had already Made mostly true Christianity illegal. They had made religion illegal. They'd also made it, by the way, illegally criticized. Well, people think that the Muslim greatest mass murderer was Adolf Hitler. And no, actually, if you want to talk about genocide, the fact that people in America don't know about what the Bolsheviks did to Christians, where did the idea of a concentration camp come from?

[Co-host Gerald]

The Bolsheviks?

[Main Host]

And by the way, that is true. That is true that they did persecute, kill Christians, because Bolsheviks, and especially if you look at the leadership of Lenin, was distinctly anti Christian. Now, if we're going to say they were all Jews, well, I'll get to the numbers. It was about 5% of the Bolsheviks were Jews. They made up anywhere from 2 to 5% of the population. More of the leadership. But some of these places include people like Lenin as Jew, he did have some Jewish ethnicity in his family. His parents, they converted to Christianity before he was born. He was distinctly atheist and he wanted to destroy the idea of God. Peace without God was one of their slogans. Now, if you think that observant practicing Jews are out there destroying religion because they espouse peace without God, fine. There's no convincing you. But I want to go through a couple of things. How the Bolsheviks came to be who they were and what they ultimately did. Because it is important. We've talked about it quite a bit. This is remedial for those of you who have been here a while. Bolsheviks, radicals, Marxist faction. Right. Early 1900s in Russia, specifically formed in 1903, there was a split. The Russian Social Democrat Labor Party. You had the Mensheviks and you had the Bolsheviks, which funny, Menshevik means minority. Bolshevik means majority. Even though they ended up kind of oscillating, where sometimes one would be the majority, one would be the minority. And the Bolsheviks were led by Vladimir Lenin. This is one of those things. Well, Lenin read a book on Marx, just so you know how badly it's permeated culture. As though people aren't horrified by that American pie. Also, something interesting. Interesting. The Mensheviks were effectively socialists as well. But they believed because Russia was so poor that they would go through the legal process and they would need a period of capitalism to generate some kind of wealth and then hand it over to the state.

[Co-host Gerald]

They always do. They always need a little capitalism first. Let's say seize the means of production. Seize the means of whatever. It's because it existed because of capitalism.

[Main Host]

Well, that's where the Bolsheviks said, no, no, we don't need that anyway, because the state Won't exist. And through quite a bit of violence early on, then we'll do away with state violence. And of course, it just led to abject poverty failures by any metric, and of course, mass death, which the Nazis would have been jealous over. So if you look at the Bolsheviks, you know, Lenin, it was basically the difference. Narrow party, narrower party leadership than the Mensheviks. They believed in elite leadership. They didn't believe in democratic decision making. They said a conversation will take place, but everyone gets in line and marches once they have orders. So it's almost a self defeating argument at this point. But they believed in radical political revolution and it was distinctly anti God, distinctly anti Christian because of the Russian Orthodox Church at that point. Party, I think, formalized, I believe it was 1912 conference in Prague. Okay. That's how it came to be. Who were the Bolsheviks? Well, it was mostly like people from intelligentsia, as you would know them, like academia now, by the way, you see a lot of Bolsheviks in academia to this day. That's where you see a lot of socialists, a lot of people who say Communism in theory works. Factory workers, peasants. Very similar to the alliance that we saw before the restructuring of right and left under Donald Trump. It was intelligentsia and then kind of big unions. This brings us to, were they all Jewish? Were they mostly Jewish? They started a higher percentage of Jews, around 10% in the early 1900s. And a big reason for that, just to be clear, is because Jews were specifically discriminated against in certain Russia. So they were naturally going to be more inclined to take part in revolutionary politics. On average, about 5%, though, Bolsheviks were Jewish. And on average, Jews made up about 4% of the total Russian population.

[Co-host Gerald]

That's pretty representative.

[Main Host]

Yeah, Ethnic Russian Bolsheviks, about 78%. Also, you can look at other groups too. People will say the Jews, they'll say they were disproportionately represented at the beginning of the Bolshevik Revolution. Sure. Now do Latvians, now do Georgians. Why? Because people who had an axe to grind would try and ride the coattails of any revolutionary measures at that point in time. Let's say during the American era of slavery, there was a party that specifically came about and said, you know what, we are going to free the slave. Well, of course, that would be the party they support for a very long time. Yes, I just described the Republican Party, so that's why the context does matter. Now, they did make up quite a bit of the leadership. Jewish people of the Bolshevik leadership, about 28% ethnic Russians, 42% other. The category would be somewhere around 30 something percent. But here's the thing, the reason for that too is Jews made up a significant percentage of all of those involved in politics in that inter revolutionary period. Why high literacy rates? Big part of that is they were limited in certain jobs that they could do. So a lot of their jobs involved literacy, A lot of their jobs involved intellectual endeavors. They were discriminated against to be clear. And it doesn't justify anyone taking part in Bolshevism. To be clear. Hate it. I've been talking about it for decades. Jews made up about 10% of all political elite. Check the references and make this all available to you. Ranging the whole political spectrum, by the way. So people say Jews made up a disproportionate amount of the Bolsheviks. Well no, as far as total Bolsheviks, 4% of the population, about 5%. They made up a huge percent of the leadership. Again, those numbers are muddied because you have people who may be ethnically Jewish. The one thing of which you can be certain is there were no faithful practicing Jews who wanted to maintain their practices with synagogues and the right to worship, who were Bolsheviks. They were secular. Very much in the same way that comparing Ben Shapiro to Harvey Weinstein wouldn't be fair. Or people celebrating Passover, their local synagogue, local temple would not be comparable to, you know, those who are involved in the UN or the WEF who don't believe in God at all. Here's some actual proof of that. The 1918 constituent elections, there are about 417,490 something thousand depending on the numbers you use. Votes for Jewish parties, they mostly went to Zionist parties, about 80,000 of which went to socialist parties. Bolsheviks were not even amongst the top three supported by Jews in Russia. So there were far, far more Jews in Russia who were opposed to Bolshevism than those who support. Yes, disproportionate percentage of those in leadership were Jewish. Here's a fun fact too. The term Jewish Bolshevism to try and confuse you and believe that the problem is Jews, not Bolsheviks, who are Marxists, Communists. Lenin was effectively Karl Marx. He was Karl Marx in a position of leadership. It was popularized directly by those involved with the Nazi party. Dietrich Eckhart, founder of the of actual Nazism. Alfred Rosenberg, Nazi official. And then of course you had Henry Ford who was writing letters to Hitler like hey, hey, pen pal, great.

[Co-host or Panelist]

Making cars, not so much on this issue.

[Main Host]

Right? What did the Bolsheviks do? So this brings us to who they were, who they weren't. And really quickly, I've again said this for why don't they talk about Stalinist Russia, concerned that far more people were killed for the same reason. They don't want to discuss Maoist China. They don't really want to discuss Pol Pot's Cambodia. Because the left doesn't want to direct you to the history of the left, because they still exist. They're still trying to convince you that Bolshevism, Marxism could work today. So they don't want to point you to the hundreds of millions, historically, of deaths at the hands of the Left. People simply now say, well, it's because Jews don't want you to. It's because the left doesn't want to direct you to the founders of their feast. Here's what the Bolsheviks did. 1917, that was the October Revolution. They seized power from the Russian Provisional Government. There was the Red Terror. You guys have heard of this. People who are new here, they just kind of throw that on you. 1918 to 1922. 200,000 people were exactly executed by the Bolsheviks during this consolidation of power. I'll read it to you directly. According to Lenin, he said, we set ourselves the ultimate aim of abolishing this state. All organized and systemic violence, all use of violence against people in general, the 200,000 notwithstanding. As we start this thing, you need to break a few eggs. We do not expect the advent of a system of society in which the principle of subordination of the minority to the majority will not be observed. In striving for socialism, however, we are convinced that it will develop into communism and therefore that the need for violence against people in general, for the subordination of one man to another and of one section of the population to another, will vanish altogether, since people will become accustomed to observing the elementary conditions of social life without violence and without subordination. But for right now, you will subordinate. Yes, yes.

[Co-host or Panelist]

And violence.

[Main Host]

Yes, and a little bit of violence also. We cannot have God, because if we have God, we have strong families, we have strong churches. These are communities. We cannot have communities because, dear nothing, they might fight back. And if you want to know where Bolshevism still exists today, some Jewish people. Sure. To be clear, I've said this in the past, and this is the case for tribalism. I'm going to disagree with Jews on a lot. Certainly theologically, I'm going to disagree with the left on everything. I'm going to disagree with many black voters in this country a lot, probably more than we agree. I'm going to disagree with the Left on everything. I'm going to disagree with with women in the Western world today a lot. I'm going to disagree with the left on everything. I'm going to disagree with Muslims quite a bit. I'm going to disagree with the left on everything. And today Bolshevism exists exclusively, as it always has on the left and they are not hiding it. Identify the drivers of that which ails this country. It's funny, sometimes American journalists talk about how bad a country is because people

[Co-host Gerald]

are lining up for food.

[Main Host]

That's a good thing. Our main project is to unite the working class in this country against a fascist agenda. A calm all of the workers are all right. None of the rich will survive.

[Narrator or News Reader]

Though we will draw this city closer together. We will replace the frigidity of rugged individualism with the warmth of collectivism. But then there are also other issues

[Main Host]

that we firmly believe in.

[Narrator or News Reader]

Whether it's BDS right or whether it

[Main Host]

is the end goal of seizing the means of production where we do not have the same level of support at this very moment. The reason this matters, if you are starting off where you have said the through line is Jew, I will say this secular humanist Jews have presented quite a few problems for the United States. I will not disagree with that. And I agree as a matter of foreign policy, by the way, that we need to look out for the interests of our country first and AIPAC can go screw themselves with a wire brush. But if you are starting off looking at the threat threat saying okay, where do the remnants of Bolshevism still exist? And you've predetermined Jew, you've just ignored atheists, Muslims, secular Jews like Bernie, Buddhists. But there is one through line that is remarkably consistent. They're all leftists and you don't see it anywhere on the right. At least you didn't for a very long time. You need more proof. Modern day Lenin acolytes, a lot of celebrities they love to venerate another Marxist, another Bolshevik of another flavor, Che Guevara, stamp it on a T shirt and sell it for 29 bucks. Now if you see all that and go through line Jew, you may need to check your biases. Let me give you another example. Lenin. We're talking about the Bolsheviks led by Lenin. To be clear, there's still a statue of him in the United States States today. Matter of fact, it's a statue that they would no longer they refused to erect in Russia.

[Co-host Gerald]

They've actually brought it down.

[Main Host]

They brought it from Russia to the United States for American Bolsheviks to be able to enjoy. Where, where, where? Seattle.

[Narrator or News Reader]

The first leader of the Soviet Union seems like an unlikely figure to be immortalized in the U.S. but this statue, correction, revolutionary Vladimir Lenin has sat at the Seattle intersection since 1996. The Czechoslovak Socialist Republic commissioned and displayed Emil Vinkov's work. But then a year later, the Soviet empire collapsed. Like many other depictions of Lenin, it was soon taken down. Years later, Washington native Louis E. Carpenter, now living in Slovakia, discovered it laying in a scrapyard. He argued the statue's artistic merit to the Slovak government. A deal was made for $41,000 in which he mortgaged his house to fund its purchase and transport. In August 1993, it arrived in Carpenter's hometown of Issaquah. Sadly, though, only months later, he was killed in a car accident, leaving the statue's status in limbo. A couple years later, local artist Peter Bevis facilitated a deal to display Lennon here in this intersection until the family finds a buyer. That was almost 30 years ago. So here it sits, an unlikely Cold war era landmark in a city that played a huge role for America during World War II.

[Main Host]

Now, I know someone's probably gonna find a banknote or someone who co signed a loan. Ah, see? Jew. Okay, sure, fine. But Jews make up about 2% of the greater Seattle area. So they wouldn't be able to be the reason that that statue that has four and a half stars on Yelp. You know what may contribute to it? If you're looking for modern day Bolshevism, King county, where Seattle sits, is one of the bluest counties in the country. So if you're trying to identify the drivers of modern day Marxism and Bolshevism, yes, you will find quite a few Jewish Americans because you'll find a lot of them in intelligentsia and a lot of them in endeavors that involve the mind as opposed to the hands. Not a very robust physical people, but with that statute, they just don't want to. You're far less likely. You're far less likely to run into

[Co-host or Panelist]

this,

[Main Host]

Far less likely to run into that than you are to see this. Yeah, and here's the thing, too. And I know we're going to have to leave, you and I. This is one of the. No one wants to wade into these conversations right now, because I know someone will say. Say you're paid by the Jews to say this. Of course people will say that. You know what? You sound like a liberal. You sound like a Bolshevik. I've been around here a long fucking time. You know what people used to say, oh, you don't support the Kyoto Protocol, first the Montreal Accord, then the Paris Climate Agreement. You must be paid by Big Oil. And that is 2 degrees of retarded lazy argument. First off, it's not something that can be proven or disproven, so that's lazy. It's not a good argument. Second, you could be paid by big Oil or have received a check from and still be right. And saying a 0.3 degree Celsius increase in temperature over the next century will not have catastrophic results to the point that we believe the wef should be in charge of what we drive. It's two layers of lazy arguing. And I've said, I will open this up to any commentator who's willing to. We can have a third party auditor look at the books. I can tell you not only have I never received a dime from any foreign entity, any foreign country, we also don't receive money from nonprofits who undoubtedly have a lot of influences that may be both domestic and foreign. It's the only place, like I said, I'm going to disagree with Jews and a lot the left on everything. Blacks and a lot the left on everything, women on a lot, even feminists on a lot the left on everything. And the threat still exists. There are still people pushing it right now because it's not going to be done at the tip of a bayonet. But what were the Bolsheviks seeking to destroy? It wasn't just the tsars and it wasn't just the ruling class. They knew that to destroy in order to have a culture, in order to have a society where you could say there was no subordination because everybody was subordinate, you had to destroy, and I don't mean institutions like academia or the entertainment industry, you had to destroy godly institutions like the family, like community, like moral absolutes that were agreed upon as a society, you have to do away with all of that, that deconstruct it so you can replace it with a new deity. And that deity, that new God, is always the state. So be aware of it and understand who it is that you're fighting. You let me know if you think that's fair if you're not a member yet. The reason we're able to discuss these issues, and we always will, whether it's the popular position or not, we strive to be right. We're able to do that because of your support. That's where we actually, that's who signs our checks. You rumble premium $99 a year. You get this wonderful hand etched mug. 100% more show everything ad free or $9 a month if we've moved you, inspired you, informed you. If not, hey, you're gonna go on and watch Hayley Caronia for free. Free content all day and let us earn your viewership tomorrow at 11am Eastern. I'm curious to take some chats, but we have to play hipster or hobo. Oh, do we?