Yes, It's Time For Tribalism

Summary

Louder with Crowder – "Yes, It's Time For Tribalism"

Date: January 13, 2026
Host: Steven Crowder
Main Theme: The value and necessity of tribalism in contemporary American political life, with critiques of left-wing ideology, a satirical look at the news, and a segment rebutting Jon Stewart.

---

Episode Overview

This episode of "Louder with Crowder" centers on Steven Crowder's argument that "tribalism"—strong in-group loyalty and opposition toward out-groups—is not only inevitable but necessary for the American right in the face of left-wing ideological dominance. Crowder makes the case that the overwhelming ideological split in the United States falls between left and right, and that unity within the right is paramount to preserving the nation’s core values. He mixes direct political commentary with sketches and satirical segments, then launches a lengthy point-by-point rebuttal of recent criticisms from liberal comedian Jon Stewart.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Opening Rant: The Case for Tribalism

[00:15 – 12:14]

• Crowder discusses the meaning and utility of tribalism:

  • Criticizes the frequent use of "tribalism" as a pejorative, arguing it's actually necessary for political survival.
  • Argues that the core American conflict is not among subgroups (race, class, gender, etc.), but between two dominant worldviews: left and right.
  • Lists a series of polarizing issues – abortion, immigration, censorship, gender identity, Second Amendment, affirmative action, taxation, etc. – claiming overwhelming majorities on the left and right split decisively on each.

• Crowder’s rationale for right-wing tribalism:

  • Presents poll data (referenced on his site) to argue that on issues critical to American identity, “the left” overwhelmingly holds destructive stances.
  • "You cannot fight one giant unified tribe with smaller unallied factions. You have to form an equally large, if ideally larger, tribe. A unified tribe." [09:44]
  • Encourages dissent within the right, but draws a hard line against any unity with the left: "Because we know how that ends. We are guaranteed of how that ends." [11:28]

• Notable quote:

  • "Tribalism, I don't only think it's good, I think it's necessary. And anyone who wants a bumper sticker saying it's not left versus right, I think you need to wake up." [11:50]

---

2. Sketch: Wesley Snipes and the IRS

[12:14 – 15:00]

• Satirical segment referencing tax evasion, using a character impersonating Wesley Snipes arguing with the IRS over bizarre tax claims (e.g., home office in a coffin).
• Concludes with a mock prescription for visiting a sponsor for tax relief.

---

3. Roundtable Banter & Transition

[15:00 – 17:00]

• Introduces the show’s panel ("Gerald CEO," "Captain Morgan," et al.).
• Brief discussion about labels and the utility of “the tribe” theme.

---

4. Debate on Political & ‘Justified’ Violence

[17:00 – 24:30]

• Crowder and team react to a viral video of a counter-protester striking left-wing activists after being harassed.

• They frame the violence as "justified" self-defense, explicitly distinguishing it from political violence.

• Panelists joke about the incident, celebrating the outcome (“He assaulted that guy so bad he got up and wanted more.” [22:35]) and mock the protestors as “delusional.”

• Debate on terminology and harassment:

  • Discussion mocks the use of "incel" as an insult and frames those who attack social outsiders as bullies.
  • "You are the bully. You get that right when you punch someone or assault them for being an incel." [21:32]

---

5. Satire: Autistic Barbie & Diversity in Toys

[24:48 – 32:40]

• News commentary: Barbie and the Autistic Self Advocacy Network launch an “Autistic Barbie.”

• Crowder and the panel ridicule the move as pandering and exploitative (“Come on, Barbie. I'm retarded.” [25:26]).

• Satirical song and jokes about the accessories.

• Lampooning of other inclusive toys (Ken with vitiligo, Down syndrome Barbie, “minor attracted person Ken”) and a segment listing “failed toys” like “sex offender Furby” and “Beaner Babies.” [27:32–29:34]

• Serious commentary:

  • A panelist mentions being a parent to autistic children, expressing frustration that such toys might make kids feel more alienated:
    • "That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard… It feels like it's taking advantage, you know, for a quick cash grab." [31:18-31:30]

---

6. Jon Stewart Rebuttal: The Media & Political Satire

[34:15 – 59:49]

a. General Overview

• Crowder praises Jon Stewart’s comedic talent and intelligence, but accuses him of knowing better yet treating his audience as dumb.
  • “Jon Stewart is smart enough to know better. And now he's treating his audience as though they are not.” [35:53]

b. Segmented Point-by-Point Rebuttals

• Venezuela and Oil Companies ([36:58 – 43:12])

  • Disputes Stewart’s take that Trump was “taking over” Venezuela or being glib with oil executives.
  • Explains Exxon and Conoco’s background and the negotiation dynamic.
  • “Jon Stewart knows what satire is. He knows what trolling is. He knows what President Trump is doing there and that he knows that this is called negotiation.” [40:55]

• Iranian Revolution vs. ICE Shooting ([43:43 – 48:59])

  • Criticizes Stewart for drawing a false equivalence between government repression in Iran and law enforcement incidents in the U.S.

• Greenland & Denmark Colonization ([49:46 – 51:25])

  • Argues Stewart’s analogy about America’s colonial past and Denmark’s claim over Greenland is misleading and “nothing alike.”

• January 6th and Law Enforcement ([51:25 – 59:49])

  • Emphasizes leftist hypocrisy in supporting law enforcement only when politically convenient (i.e., against January 6th protestors).
  • Asserts defendants from January 6th received excessive charges and harsher due process violations compared to left-leaning protestors.
  • "The one example where we can see systemically there was corruption and American citizens were robbed of their constitutional rights is the one where they [the left] side with law enforcement." [56:12]

c. Notable Quotes:

• "He treats his audience like they are morons. I attempt to treat you like you know better." [60:12]
• "They want to keep you dumb. They want you to remain uneducated. It's why they don't provide context. It's why they knowingly deceptively edit their clips..." [63:18]

---

7. Panel Reflection on Tribalism and Media

[61:51 – 64:51]

• Final case for tribalism:
  • Crowder insists it’s dangerous to “hopscotch” from the right to find common ground with any on the left, as they will consolidate power and restrict rights.
  • Dismisses the “party of the poor” label for Democrats, asserting wealthy elites favor the left for their own self-interest.

---

8. Preview and Closing Banter

[64:52 – 66:31]

• Tease for a future segment ("Labor Nazis").
• Play a clip of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in a roundtable context, dismissing her and others as "stupid" in gender and sports debates.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• "The only thing that really remains is determining what our tribe is and who is outside of it. Let me explain why." [03:43]
• "Historically, those with no tribe are slaves. Serfs at best, slaves most of the time." [09:09]
• "If you simply bet 'leftist' every time, you would be correct at least 60 to 90% of the time." [08:30]
• "You worry too much, old man." (from the Wesley Snipes sketch) [12:55]
• "Come on, Barbie. I'm retarded." (parody song lyric) [25:26]
• "That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard... It feels like it's taking advantage, you know, for a quick cash grab." (regarding 'Autistic Barbie') [31:18-31:30]
• "Do you see how f'd up everything is right now?" (mocking Jon Stewart's style) [40:23]
• "He treats his audience like they are morons. I attempt to treat you like you know better." [60:12]

---

Important Timestamps

| Time | Segment/Topic | |:-------------|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | 00:15 | Crowder’s Opening Monologue: The necessity of tribalism | | 08:30 | "Betting leftist" – Crowder on ideological prediction & polling | | 12:14 | Comedy sketch: Wesley Snipes vs. the IRS | | 17:00 | Panel discussion: justified vs political violence (viral protest clip) | | 24:48 | Autistic Barbie news & extended satirical segment | | 31:18 | Panelist reflects on exploitation in diversity/inclusivity toys | | 34:15 | Introduction to the Jon Stewart rebuttal | | 36:58 | Crowder's counterpoints on Venezuela, Trump, ExxonMobil | | 43:43 | Iran, ICE, dangerous equivalences in political commentary | | 49:46 | Greenland, colonization, and media analogies deconstructed | | 51:25 | January 6th, law enforcement, hypocrisy, and due process | | 56:12 | "Systemic corruption" & law enforcement double standards | | 61:51 | Crowder’s final word on why right-tribalism is essential | | 64:52 | Preview of future segments; closing jokes and panel chatter |

---

Tone & Language

The episode maintains Steven Crowder’s trademark confrontational, sarcastic, and comedic style. The arguments are couched in hyperbolic language, with frequent digressions into satire, parody songs, mockery of political opponents, and ribald humor. Quotes and sketches often use provocative language and dark comedy, consistent with the show's reputation for pushing boundaries.

---

Conclusion

Steven Crowder stakes out an unapologetically tribalist position, arguing that the scale of disagreement between left and right in the U.S. renders unity on the right essential for national survival, as he frames it. The episode is punctuated with comedic sketches and controversial jokes, but the central throughline is his vehement opposition to leftist policy and media, culminating in a detailed rebuttal of Jon Stewart's satire and political arguments. The show ends with a call for viewers to embrace right-wing tribalism, participate in the show's community, and, of course, subscribe to "Mug Club."

---

This summary covers all substantial content from the episode, omitting ads, intros, and outros as per instructions.

Transcript

[A]

Welcome to the lineup live here on Rumble. That's every day from 9am eastern to 7pm with more to come. You don't need to change that dial. It's all free. YouTube is dead as far as live streaming and Rumble did it. We're going to get to a lot today. We have a seven plus one because Barbie's autistic, so that'll be fun. We have a rebuttal to Jon Stewart and well, before that, I'd like to take a minute here. This is just, I guess, sort of a video op ed. I want to take a minute here to make a case to you because we see a lot of infighting on the right and people wondering about the future of the direction of the country. Thinking about it a lot during the break. Look, it comes down to this. You hear the word all the time, tribalism, right? It's often used as a pejorative to denigrate. You'll hear people, you know, sort of extol the notion that, well, you know, it's those in power, man, they see, they just want us warring, man. Tribalism is to keep us fighting and not going after those in power, man. You gotta stop the tribalism. That's wrong. Because the most important thing that those on the right, that conservatives, those who support America first, the MAGA movement, the most important thing that all of us can do is oppose leftists as a group, as a tribe. Tribalism means by definition that you have a strong in group loyalty, often combined with a negative view of outsiders as to the future of this country. Tribalism is good. Tribalism is necessary. The only thing that really remains is determining what our tribe is and who is outside of it. Let me explain why. I know you can certainly find disagreements on any notable issue of the day, be it cultural, economic, social. For example, right now there are plenty of black people who supported George Floyd, for example, who believe that the reaction to Renee Goode's death is inconsistent because no one would protest if a black person was shot by cops who was resisting arrest. Of course that's wrong. And that's a common theme you'll see with a lot of these smaller groups, uncommon sort of divergence in opinion. I'll give you some more examples. There are some of those on the Democrat left who support Israel, for example, and there are some of those on the right who don't. There are some on the Democrat left who support strong Second Amendment protections. There are some on the right who may be ambivalent. And it's not lost on me, these numbers don't exist in especially small numbers, by the way, but they are not the majority. Rarely, if ever. These outliers are just that, outliers, but an overwhelming preponderance of data history. Real world results at this point show us that the major issues of our day break down into overwhelming majorities of two distinct worldviews, left and right, in a way that cannot be seen across any other primary groups, no matter how you divide or categorize people. So, yes, the left will, as a majority, support extreme forms of abortion. The right, as a majority will not. The majority of the left will support erosion of our immigration laws. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will actively oppose deportations of illegal aliens. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will oppose the building, for example, of a border wall. We saw that. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will support forms of censorship or hate speech regulation, as sometimes are often justified. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will support experimental sexuality, gender, including, by the way, transitioning of children. Majority of the left. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will support teaching public curriculums that paint America as the villains of history, more guilty than other nations to have come before us. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will support significant erosions and ultimately the stripping of your second amendment rights. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will have favorable views of socialism. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will support more government control over children in comparison and in lieu of their parents. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will hold negative views of traditional Christianity. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will support feminism, more specifically the upending of traditional gender norms. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will support forms of dei, race or gender based quotas, hiring practices. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will support removal of historical American Christian symbolism, including, but not limited to monuments, documents and even wording. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will support extreme environmental restrictions on your daily life, including, but not limited to what kind of car you can drive, what kind of food you can eat, et cetera. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will support affirmative action in education. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will support increases in almost all significant taxes outside of the poverty income bracket. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will support the policy or the idea that those in the poverty bracket not be required to contribute anything to taxes and be net drains. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will oppose work requirements for welfare, social safety, net benefits. The the majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will support the use of said benefits for sugary soda drinks. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will oppose voter identification. The majority of the right will not. The majority of the left will when polled and I will make all of these results available to you. Check the link in the description the majority of the left will will support use of violence as a means of political resistance or readily available tool for political change. The majority of the right will not. And all of the above. By the way, all of those issues have polling demonstrating an overwhelming majority split on both sides, meaning that on all issues you'll see a majority of leftists and conservatives being for or opposed respectively. For context, if you look at those polls, check the references to the tune of about 60 to 90% as far as a majority of the left majority of the right in support or opposition respectively. What that means is that if you were to make a bet and you were to attribute an abhorrent or simply wrong view to any particular group, if you simply bet leftist every time, you would be correct at least 60 to 90% of the time. This is very important because it helps you understand and identify the enemy. And I'm using my language very thoughtfully and carefully. Yes, enemy. For every issue at which the thread of Americanism, the very core of Americanism, is being pulled, yanked, torn for every person seeking to destroy the very foundation that makes this nation singularly unique and admirable. If you believe it, for every instance 55, 60 to 90% of the time, you will find a leftist pulling at that thread. They are the only ones who can truly destroy the country. They are the only ones who have both the corrosive views of the world and the numbers or means with which to accomplish their goals. This brings us back to tribalism. Look, you cannot fight one giant unified tribe with smaller on allied factions. You have to form an equally large, if ideally larger tribe. A unified tribe. Historically, let me make this clear. Historically, those with no tribe are slaves. Serfs at best, slaves most of the time. So the question becomes, are the remaining 10 to 30% of issues on which you may diverge with some on the right worth Willingly handing power over to the left. If not, then you need to join a tribe as a conservative. Now look, I significantly diverge with the left on serious issues that are foundational to America in a way that cannot be said of any other class by which I may divide or delineate myself, be it income, class, age, race, professional field, degree of education, religion or even gender. You would not find that consistent disagreement and split with a group that has an overwhelming majority opposed to what I believe than the left. There would be no other way, no other group. Now that doesn't mean, just to be clear, doesn't mean that you have to agree with the right on everything. No one is expected to. It doesn't even mean that you shouldn't disagree and hold those on the political right. Conservative maga, America First Accountable. You, you are expected to as your duty to operate within and improve the tribe. But you, you, everyone here, you, I, we are still precluded from linking arms with today's political left always because of what is at stake. That is also our duty because the data, because of the real world history and results. It is our duty to ensure that the political left can gain no foothold in this country whatsoever. Because we know how that ends. We are guaranteed of how that ends. I may not and I do not agree with those on the right on everything, but I consistently and foundationally disagreeable with the left more than any other group that's ever existed throughout mankind and certainly in today's America. And those issues determine the fate the future of America. They determine the fate for the tribe of America. So tribalism, I don't only think it's good, I think it's necessary. And anyone who wants a bumper sticker saying it's not left versus right, I think you need to wake up and comment below if you disagree on with the show. So Mr. Snipes spoke with the IRS. Slight problem. Seems to avoid taxes. You falsely filed as a non resident.

[B]

Yeah, we can't help you sit your.

[A]

$5 ass down before I make change. Hey. Okay, well there's no. We get that you're stressed, okay? We all have stress. But you cannot list as your state of origin the shadow world. The bridge between what is reality and the unreal is very small.

[B]

Yeah, but you clearly were born in.

[A]

America, so Day Walker is not a citizenship. Well, maybe I don't see it that way, okay? But here on earth we pay taxes in this country as human beings. And therein lies the problem. You worry too much, old man.

[B]

Old man.

[A]

I mean you are 37.

[B]

I'm only 34.

[A]

Looks like your mascara's running. No.

[B]

Well, you're not getting it, Wesley.

[A]

What, do you think I'm stupid? Yes. Yes, because you listed as a dependent a bat. I did?

[B]

You don't understand the problem.

[A]

Look, I don't need a history lesson, okay? Assuming you're a vampire, you clearly would be the bat. You can't list yourself as a dependent. What's he doing is a curse. I don't want that curse.

[C]

I'm not.

[A]

All right, Mr. Snipes, you list as home office coffin.

[B]

What's the square footage on that?

[D]

1600.

[A]

What? Don't let the IRS bust your balls. Visit tnusa.com Crowder or call 1-800-958-1000 for immediate relief and expert guidance. Meaning. Glad to be with you. I'm off my high horse on the tribalism thing, so now it's time to have fun. Live show weekdays, 11am Eastern. We do have a rebuttal to John Stewart. We're going to be talking about Retard Barbie. Let me ask you, which news personality do you take seriously out there? If any genuine question. We haven't asked that. Like, are there any that you do take seriously anymore? And I mean traditional news, legacy media, or on a network television. All right. Gerald CEO. Captain Morgan. How are you?

[E]

I'm doing well. How are you?

[A]

I'm good.

[E]

I like the tribe.

[A]

I like the tribe. I just, you know, want you going after the elites, man. Okay, well, I don't actually disagree with billionaires anywhere near as often as I disagree with the left. Like, we have labels for a reason. It doesn't mean that everybody. But this. We got to stop doing this. I believe in labels, man. And the left is like, follow lockstep the entire time. Yeah, they transition, you know, children and pee on you in a closet. And Friday, January 16th, Big Laugh Comedy Club, Fort Worth, Texas. Not underscore Firestein. How are you, sir?

[B]

Good. Good. That's. This Friday?

[A]

That is this Friday? Yes. Wow, it's a good Friday.

[B]

My sister's birthday.

[A]

Oh, that's unreleg.

[E]

Wait, a doctor.

[B]

I just remembered it.

[A]

Does she watch?

[B]

I don't know. We don't talk that often. But yeah, I'll call her later.

[A]

If you wish a happy birthday in a fore. But there is no one there to hear it.

[B]

Yeah, well, she'll still shit in the woods.

[A]

Yes, I think so.

[B]

I know that much.

[A]

And use a rabbit. Hey, look, is this. Oh, okay. We have a few things to get to. We have autistic Barbie. That's gonna be fun. Yep. But first, let me set this up for you, okay? And I know sometimes people will say, like, hey, hey, you should never support political violence. You've never heard me say that. Political violence is never appropriate, all right? Otherwise we wouldn't have an American revolution. That being said, you've not seen me call for political violence. And in the following clip with the one you're about to see, this is not political violence. This is simply justified violence. It's just good violence. Now, the fact that all of the people clocked, the fact that all the people get ping out cold happen to be leftists who are disrupting. That's just an added bonus. So this is a clip of a bunch of leftist protesters harassing, assaulting a man. And he has finally had enough. And it just. It warms the soul.

[B]

He can't do that.

[A]

That can pierce your ears. It's grievous bodily injury.

[B]

There's, like, warnings on them that say that you can't do that.

[A]

Trying to get. Removing himself multiple times.

[B]

And then you'll be laughing long.

[A]

And then he decides that he doesn't need to be assaulted and battered anymore. And then. Created a world where dreams are apart. And you decorated my life by painting your love all over my heart. You decorated my life. Like a rhyme with no reason in it. An unfinished song. There was no harmony. Life meant nothing. Hey, guys. Hey. Oh, yeah.

[B]

Is this what love feels like?

[A]

It is.

[E]

It is.

[A]

I never thought I'd know it.

[E]

He showed me what love is.

[F]

That's great.

[A]

Fantastic.

[B]

I like. The guy in the red comes back.

[A]

He comes back.

[B]

He got embarrassed and then got mad and goes, I'm tough.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

And then he just got folded like a buffalo table.

[A]

He's the guy. He's the guy with the. With the megaphone.

[E]

Yeah.

[A]

And I will say this. It looks like the guy has an understanding of the basics because he does wind up with a wild punch, but that's when he knows the guy can't hit him back. Then he kind of sets his feet when a few guys come in. And that guy in red comes right back, hands down, like he's not even expecting it. Bing. And he does the stiff timber.

[B]

You know what's. You know what's great to me is that that guy, he gets knocked out the second time. He has no idea what's happening because he's knocked out.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

He just folds over. He's going to have to watch this back and realize that the guy knocked him out and didn't Think about him for a second longer. He was on to the next guy.

[A]

Just pounded that dude's face. Yeah. And that's very clearly self. He's not. He's not pounding on a guy on the ground. He's not kicking him, stomping. He's. Bing, Bing. Backs up, moves on. They follow him. Bing, bing, bing. Oh, you coming back for more? Hey, hello, old friend. Bing.

[E]

And he's gonna have to watch himself, throw with gusto the umbrella and take off his gloves as he's walking up to get his ass beat again.

[A]

Sorry.

[E]

It's just hilarious.

[A]

What's.

[B]

What's Minnesota's hockey team?

[A]

Is it the. Well, it used to be the Minnesota North Stars. It's the Wild.

[B]

Minnesota Wild. They're gonna have to call that guy.

[A]

Yes, they are.

[E]

Yeah.

[B]

To call him out. It doesn't matter if you can score. It doesn't. Can you skate? That's all that matters.

[A]

The people you can comment below, you support this, right? People saying, like, aren't we better than that? No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. The guy is blaring that megaphone in his ear, by the way. I have those. They come with a warning to not put them right up against you. That could. That could cause permanent hearing loss. He tries to brush it away. He moves away. He kind of pushes with his foot. He's walking away. And then finally when he's like, you know what? All right, I see my opportunity. Bingo. And he wants to move on. And he gets. He gets jumped by a bunch of people who apparently had no semblance of an understanding that this may go poorly for them.

[E]

Yes.

[B]

Where do you get that confidence? It was great not being able to fight at all. And that's a lot of confidence.

[A]

Well, these people are delusional.

[B]

Come from.

[A]

Do you hear them yelling? They're yelling. Yeah. Nobody likes you in cell. They're almost quite literally retarded. They're just used.

[B]

Weird thing to call someone. You can call somebody and involuntary celibate. Yeah, like, but I've had sex.

[A]

Yeah. And it also.

[B]

Yeah, but you're an incel.

[A]

And that also means you have the right.

[B]

I'm still gonna have sex tonight.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

That doesn't bother me at all.

[A]

By the way, when people say, that's like, you're an incel. So I have the right to harass you. You do realize that you're. You're basically saying, yeah, you're so unattractive that people won't sleep with you. Loser. I'm a bully. I'm Going to assault a loser. I'm going to assault a nerd, an outcast. You are the bully. You get that right when you punch someone or assault them for being an incel, which I doubt. This man. This man was probably swimming in snatch after.

[B]

He is for sure now.

[A]

Yes, he is.

[B]

Yeah, he's going to get Minnesota Wild later tonight.

[A]

Absolutely. I do think he's going to be one of them Vikings.

[B]

Listen, he's going to get viked.

[A]

You need my seed. I hope.

[E]

I hope they don't press charges, but I think he's going to get in trouble for the first punch. Not that he should, but I think he will.

[B]

He might.

[E]

It was bent over looking away. I support it wholeheartedly.

[A]

We should start a gofundme. Yeah, exactly.

[B]

Important to know he didn't kill anybody.

[A]

That's right. Yeah. He didn't kill anybody.

[B]

Kill anybody.

[A]

He didn't even follow up and kick anybody on the ground. Like the Jackals who gang beat, he insult.

[B]

He assaulted that guy so bad he got up and wanted more.

[A]

Yes, exactly.

[E]

Well, he went to the grass. He's like, I'm about to knock these people out. I don't want them to hit.

[B]

I better be safe.

[E]

Like go to the grass or them for the protection.

[A]

That's why I think he went to the grass for himself.

[B]

I think.

[A]

I think. I think he was like, you know what? This could go. That there's going to be a bunch of them coming in. And you notice he shortens up his punches when there's a group. And then when that red guy comes back up, he's like, no, I have time to cock this guy.

[B]

Give him a cartoon wind.

[A]

Yeah, the Betty Rubble. It's almost like he wasn't even looking at him.

[E]

The guy's coming over here and he's looking over here and he's like, there you are.

[B]

Any leftists who think they want civil war, watch this.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

Do you think it reminds me of an old Mike V video? You remember Mike V. The skater? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. There's an old video where he was like, by a couple, you know, semi truck trailers and these guys surrounded him and he beat the crap out of like three or four guys. It's so good. There was a great skate video for a long time.

[A]

There's a great video, I couldn't find it, of a. A Russian guy walking with his wife in the park. And he's, of course, looks just like a. He has the tracksuit and he's walking and this one guy just literally backhand smacks his wife as they're walking through, and there's two of them, and he's just bing, bing, bing, bing. And he knocks both of them out. They get back up, and his wife starts yelling at him. No. Like she knows what he's capable of. He just grabs her arm. He's like, let's get out of here.

[B]

I think that might have been an accident. Like, ah.

[A]

I was like. And no, no, no, it wasn't. It wasn't. He literally looks there and he smacks her. But the point is, do you think after he. He. He knocked out, he clocked that guy in red and then, you know, he. He. I would say he definitely rung the bell of the other guys. Do you think that when he turned and saw the guy in red coming back, that's as happy as a human being has ever been?

[E]

I mean, I think so.

[A]

Yeah.

[E]

He knows his enemy.

[A]

Yeah.

[E]

Yeah.

[B]

It's like a dog watching you pull a Frisbee out.

[A]

Yes, yes, exactly. Yeah.

[B]

His tail started wagging. Yeah, he started jumping up.

[A]

Anyway, the left is retarded, if they didn't expect. Speaking of retarded, Barbie is partnering with the Autistic Self Advocacy Network to roll out. And this is real. An autistic Barbie. All right, take a look. What is that? Hello? How about no?

[C]

I've wanted there to be an autistic doll, like, since I knew I had autism. This makes me feel.

[B]

She's got a fidget spinner.

[C]

Amazing and proud.

[A]

Having a Barbie doll that she's not autistic.

[C]

I hope that parts of the spectrum feel included in the conversation. It means a lot to finally see this happen.

[A]

Finally. Which prompted an update to a beloved song. I'm a Barbie girl in a leftist world. Forget the lipstick, I'm autistic. Headphones on my ears so I don't screech in fear. Bastardization. A liberal creation. Come on, Barbie. I'm retarded.

[E]

Oh, we're gonna have to go to church.

[A]

By the way, download a good time to tell you. Download the rumble app. Follow me there. Because there's no way YouTube's a fan of this. And you shouldn't be. You are the reason that is in and run through. I just, like, I don't know. What am I? Come on, Barbie. I'm retarding. Josh couldn't stop laughing. I was like, really? You want it? He didn't even answer. I was like, I guess he wants it.

[B]

We had trouble recording it.

[A]

Yes, we did. Then he turns on me under the.

[B]

Bus trying to Throw you under that short bus here. But I don't understand why autism doesn't. I understand other ones.

[A]

There's another.

[B]

But autism doesn't have a look.

[A]

No, it doesn't have a look.

[B]

You don't look at someone go, you're. That'd be like, I don't know, some.

[A]

Kind of racism today. You usually know someone's autistic because they announced.

[B]

Tell you immediately.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

And be like, oh, I had no idea because you were functioning so well and you drove me here.

[A]

Right. I am neurodivergent. You just think, whatever, fine. So the doll comes with features such as quote, elbow and wrist articulation enabling stimming and other hand gestures to process sensory information. A shifted gaze reflecting how some members of the community may avoid direct eye contact. A fidget spinner offering a sensory outlet that can help reduce stress and improve focus. Noise canceling headphones that reduce sensory overload. These are accessories for the Barbie.

[E]

Well, they're both.

[B]

That's all.

[A]

That's all. It should be an AAC augmentative and alternative communication tablet as a communication tool. Sensory sensitive fashions minimizing fabric to skin contact. And keep in mind the autistic Barbie. It joins a bunch of other Barbie dolls such as the Ken with Vitiligo. Is that what it is? Vitiligo? Yeah, Vitiligo, the color disorder, disabled Barbie. Barbie with down syndrome and minor attracted person. Ken, that was one that.

[B]

Oh, that shouldn't be a doll. Pedophile.

[A]

Which brings us to this week. Seven plus one. You forgot the van in the chamber. Seven plus one. Other failed toys. You know, they always try and go after some niche demographics. Number seven, Actually, Hot Wheels. Yeah, well, that.

[B]

I don't think that kid's within the age range.

[A]

Dude, I would want that.

[B]

Yeah, he's overweight. Capacity, first of all.

[F]

Looks cool.

[A]

Number six, Captain Morgan.

[E]

Tickle you back, Elmo. I hate all you.

[A]

Number five. The maid of razors. Scooter. Yeah, that was. Well, that is Chocolate's dangerous toy.

[B]

I don't want to do tricks on that.

[A]

No, I think number four. Four should be Captain Morgan.

[B]

I think. Yeah, yeah.

[A]

Captain Morgan. Number four. These are failed toys, by the way.

[E]

Beaner babies.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

Whoa, Gerald, why would you write something like that?

[A]

That just seems. I don't know who that'd be for.

[E]

Fantastic is what it is.

[A]

Going down the woke path. Number two. Josh.

[B]

Number three.

[A]

Oh, number three. Sorry.

[B]

Number three.

[A]

That's because I'm autistic. I don't. Yeah, I count ahead. Number three.

[B]

My favorite gift as a kid. The classic crack in the box.

[A]

Yep. Magic 8 ball sold separately.

[B]

Yeah. Yeah, you gotta go buy it from your dealer.

[A]

The prediction is just. It's gonna be a good time.

[C]

Always.

[A]

That's what it's. You know what? Number two.

[E]

Josh.

[A]

Sorry. Number. Yes. Number two.

[B]

All right, post operation.

[A]

Yep. Oh, my God.

[B]

Pages six and up.

[A]

I get it. These ones, these were ill fated. These were failed toys. And I remember Muhammad Rules six and up. Pretty much, yeah. And the number one failed toy that they brought, they attempted to bring to market. This was a bad one. Sex offender Furby. That's.

[B]

That's a pervy.

[A]

I'm horny look.

[B]

Like the Green River, Furby.

[A]

Yeah, and the KY Beanie Baby. And the plus one. I don't know who thought up this raggedy Ann Coulter that's been this week. Seven plus one. You forgot seven in the chamber. Oh, and by the way, this is time. I haven't really promoted this in the new year. You know, aside from Mug Club, which is now Rumble Premium, I only have one other company that I have started, that I've run, and that's Foundation Daily. That is a daily multivitamin supplement. You can get [e-mail] and if you become a subscriber, it's 40% off for life. Look, it's a multivitamin where every single ingredient on the label is what will be in the capsule. There's two additional ingredients to help you with your cholesterol, with your blood pressure, with inflammation. At their clinically effective doses, you can go get a certificate of analysis. If you have a perfect diet, hey, you don't need a multivitamin. But if you do need some help with inflammation, maybe some brain health, this is the best thing out there on the market. We had a lot of supplement companies come to us, say like, hey, you want to sell this? And I said, no, that's crap. So foundationdaily.com you get 40% off for life if you become a subscriber. If you're going to take a multivitamin, take one where you know exactly what's in there and that you know, you know it works. Anything else? No. Jon Stewart.

[E]

Jon Stewart it is.

[A]

You guys are so quiet today. I thought I was.

[B]

Are we noodles?

[E]

Mad at me?

[A]

I was throwing you on. Why are you mad at Gerald?

[B]

Tell it.

[A]

Why are you should be mad at Gerald? You don't need to explain. I don't remember being mad at Gerald, to be fair. Yeah, because we're all mad at him. So Often.

[B]

It had nothing to do with being mad at Gerald. I was just going to say, as a father of kids on the spectrum, I don't know why anyone would ever.

[A]

Want to get them toys to make them feel different. Yeah.

[B]

That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. You know what annoys me about it is it feels like it's. It's taking advantage, you know, for a quick cash grab.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

Let's get these autistic kids. Let's get them another Barbie. What do we do? Well, let's make an autistic one.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

Like, it makes the down syndrome Barbie makes sense. The wheelchair Barbie makes sense. It's like you can see.

[A]

Sure.

[B]

The kid can look at that. Be like, I see myself in this.

[A]

Right.

[B]

And I can see I can have my own little fantasies here.

[A]

Right.

[B]

Like, you know, there's nothing that's like a visible identifier.

[A]

Right.

[B]

They just. Well, they said they made it movable. Wrists and elbows like the other. I get the l. The other Barbies do that. And the fidget spinner. That doesn't fidget.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

Doesn't spin because it's a plastic toy. Like.

[A]

Yeah, it really just. It almost be frustrating.

[B]

Oh, shifting. Shifting eyes.

[A]

Yeah. No, it wasn't just eyes.

[B]

They were just eyes.

[E]

It's a.

[B]

It's a doll.

[A]

Yeah. Move.

[E]

Yeah, you move the doll.

[A]

It's a good point. It does seem exploitative. Exploit it? Yeah, it's.

[E]

Yeah.

[A]

Like that time Gerald hosted underground fighting.

[B]

There's others, right? There's other things, too, that I think are exploitative, like the, you know, love on the spectrum. Down for love. These shows. Whatever I can go for. I can go for hours on that, but it's not important.

[A]

It usually is pretty funny, though, when you see it.

[B]

Yeah, they're funny, cute people, you know?

[A]

Yeah. Yeah.

[B]

But, yeah, no more.

[A]

No more retard Barbies. That's the point.

[E]

We don't need that.

[C]

For more than 30 years in Kansas City, Kansas, a man allegedly raped and terrorized black women. A detective named Roger Golubski.

[A]

He told me to keep my mouth closed. If I did say anything, I would.

[B]

Come up missing like so many others.

[C]

But then, right before trial, he was found dead, leaving countless questions behind. Listen to corruption uncovered from Roc Nation and its philanthropic injustice division. Team Roc, wherever you get your podcasts.

[A]

All right, so Jon Stewart. No, he's very smart. He's not retarded. See, this is what's happening with the retardy Barbie. When he tries to act like he was against I Want.

[B]

I want a Barbie that has seizures. You press a button and it shakes.

[A]

Foams at the mouth.

[C]

It's just like me.

[B]

It shakes, you start shaking.

[A]

Yeah.

[C]

Yay.

[E]

Explosive vest Barbie for Saudi Arabia.

[A]

Yeah, it'd be great. Yeah. There's all. I mean, the sky is the limit. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

[E]

Kissing the wall bar or touching the wall bar.

[B]

Don't be kissing your Barbies. What are you doing in your house?

[A]

This is. Hey, look, if I'm gonna make fun of people, I'm doing everybody. Yeah, I know. The problem is you don't have like a gear 3 when it comes to. When it comes to just sort of throwing out jabs. Like, Gerald goes from one boy scout to like, ah, I was winded up over here. Yeah. You know, not everything is an overhand ride. It can just be a stiff jab.

[E]

Fine.

[A]

All right, so. So Jon Stewart and let me pre. I've always maintained John Stewart is very funny. He's effective. He's much funnier than Trevor Noah. He is much funnier than a lot of the people who you've seen host these certainly Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel. Jon Stewart was funny as a stand up. He's funny as a host. A lot of the other sort of leftist personalities who are hosts, some of the favorites, they come off as stupid. Jon Stewart is not. He's clearly very smart. Some of them really are stupid. Like Joy Reid or Harry Sisson or of course, Wolf. Lowest score ever on Celebrity Jeopardy. He is verifiably stupid.

[B]

Charity money.

[A]

And not only is he stupid to pay. Not only is he stupid because of the negative score, but he's stupid because he was surprised that it happened. Like he should have been able to avoid doing that. Like this. Know that it's not his strong suit. That's what happens when you get your news from cnn. Yes, exactly. But many of them are not stupid. Abby Phillips isn't stupid. I think she's wrong. Anderson Cooper's not stupid. He's just wrong. Jake Tapper is not stupid. He's just wrong. The pod, Save America. Those guys, they're not stupid. They're just wrong. I think this brings us back to probably the best example. Not only is he very intelligent, but he's very funny, but he is consistently wrong. And I almost think that this is worse because Jon Stewart is smart enough to know better. And now he's treating his audience as though they are not. So this is his latest monologue on President Trump and it's just sort of a mix. It's not just any one given topic. There's so much misinformation that we're going to address it point by point. Here he is playing to his audience like they are dumb.

[D]

Why is the president of the United States declaring on Wikipedia that he is now the president of Venezuela? That's real. Why is our Fed chairman making what appears to be a hostage video? How the did steak become the healthiest food in the country?

[B]

Yeah.

[D]

What is happening? We are on the Donald Trump Gravitron. We don't know what up or down is. We just know it feels like we're all gonna vomit.

[A]

But here's the thing. I think that Jon Stewart does know what up or down is. And you can see this by the way. By him schooling Bill O'Reilly, by him schooling even Tucker Carlson back in the day on Crossfire. He embarrassed people. He is very intelligent. Which brings us to today's claimed truth. All right, so keeping in mind that Jon Stewart is smart enough to know better, here's the first claim. Listen to how Jon Stewart characterizes Trump on Venezuela.

[D]

Just look at Venezuela. We took it over, what, three days ago, four days ago, five days ago? I don't remember. Meanwhile, our State Department says, if you're an American, there are armed gangs in Venezuela trying to kill you. So you would think that maybe this calls for a little gathering in the situation tent or wherever is operationally right for talking about Venezuela right now. But the president had a different idea.

[C]

President Trump convening top oil executives at the White House to talk about divvying up Venezuela's oil.

[A]

What the happening?

[D]

Yes, a meeting of all of the most important stakeholders. Exxon, Chevron, Halliburton, and of course, the guy from Dune who lives in the.

[A]

Oil bank.

[D]

By the way. I think you can tell I don't use that treatment.

[A]

Okay, so funny. So here's the truth. Of course, President Trump is doing that. And it's completely understandable when you take this in context, which I know Jon Stewart has done. He's done that himself, but he has simply chosen not to provide it. So American private energy companies are going to be responsible for fixing Venezuela's oil infrastructure. Those companies were at the White House to discuss really what that looks like. And here's something else that you need to understand. Yeah. These oil companies, ExxonMobil, along with, I believe was Conoco, they were awarded billions of dollars in international court because they had invested in infrastructure. They had deals with Venezuela until the government effectively nationalized it. They got screwed out of billions of dollars. I believe Exxon was awarded 10 billion and Conoco was 1 billion respectively, which really wouldn't even amount too close to those damages. And this is something too that I think people are very, I hate to use the term reductive because I think it's valuable, but the oil industry is different from a lot of other other industries in that, you know, banks, they simply want to get a bailout, right? They gamble with the taxpayer dollars and they get bailed out. Or auto companies, they simply make cars that nobody wants to buy, then demand more money. But these oil companies, these energy companies, they do have to go into foreign nations where they could do everything correctly and their business could be completely trashed because of another government's policy. That's why they would be sitting there negotiating with this administration wanting some form of guarantees because they lost billions of dollars even though they were extracting the energy, they were distributing the energy, they were being paid for the energy. They weren't doing anything untoward. They got screwed any anyway.

[E]

Yeah. And by the way, Jon Stewart acts like this is the first meeting that they've had about Venezuela. Like they didn't have planning meetings prior. Right. And during and after immediately and said, hey, how do we fix this country fast? I don't know, maybe get their oil back online.

[A]

Right.

[E]

There you go. Done.

[A]

Well, this brings us to the next claim from again, very intelligent man playing to you like you're dumb, Jon Stewart, that Trump is even botching it with the oil companies. Here he is now.

[D]

By the way, there was an oil company, Exxon, that expressed some reservations about investing money in rebuilding the infrastructure of a country that is, and I quote, not ours and is somewhat volatile at the moment. How did the president handle this somewhat rational cost benefit analysis?

[A]

I'd probably be inclined to keep Exxon out. I didn't like their response. They're playing to cute.

[D]

They're playing too cute. You just made yourself the president of Venezuela on Wikipedia. But they're the ones that are being glibbed. Do you see how up everything is right now? First of all, I have to offend the good faith of an oil company because they don't think they can safely extract another country's resources in as cost effective a manner as might benefit their shareholders. Who am I anymore? And by the way, Donald, why are you the president of Venezuela? Doesn't your oath of office to America have a non compete?

[A]

What are we doing now? Here's the truth. Jon Stewart knows what satire is. He knows what trolling is. He knows what President Trump is doing there and that he knows that this is called negotiation. He knows that when he says, he also just throws this out there. Extracting another country's resources. Okay, the alternative is Maduro Chavez nationalizing it, not being able to extract it, letting the infrastructure fail and starving their own people. Hey, if the United States extracting the resources and paying a fair price for it takes them out of breadlines at an Average of 27 pounds lost per Venezuelan citizen, who do you think they would rather have? We do have to understand this. There are many areas of the world that have proven they are incapable of electing and holding leadership to account who can simply adhere to basic human rights guidelines. So they're better off with the United States doing that. You have to ask the Venezuelan people. Oh, that's right. They've answered very, very clearly. You saw them celebrating in the streets. But this right here is negotiation. So Dan Pickering, the CIO of Pickering Energy Partner, said to me, it's all a part of a negotiation that's happening in public. I would not count Exxon out of this. In any negotiation. Counterparties tend to start at their most extreme position. And in talking about the changes in Venezuela, Exxon's CEO said, we're confident that with this administration and President Trump working hand in hand with the Venezuelan government that those changes can be put in place.

[E]

It is definitely a negotiation strategy. By the way, Exxon was a billion dollars. ConocoPhillips was $10 billion.

[A]

Okay, sorry, I swapped the numbers, but.

[E]

These guys are gonna be. You think Exxon's not gonna be there? And of course they're gonna go, hey, this is what we want. It's way over here. And Trump's gonna be like, ah, you're being too cute. All right, fine. This is what we want.

[A]

Yeah.

[E]

We'll settle on this.

[A]

You can't say inflation and Biden. We need to bring down energy costs and then say, by the way, we hate oil companies, and they should have no ability to extract resources whatsoever. Right. Even including the countries in which they've invested billions in infrastructure. Yeah, yeah. Oil companies, bad. So it's cool that the government nationalized it and basically stole their money. That's. That's really what happened with a lot of these American oil companies. And I get it, sometimes the only.

[B]

One, they own the equipment and they're running the operation. But it wouldn't be them doing it.

[A]

Right.

[B]

It'd be Venezuelan workers making a wage, a fair wage, hopefully.

[A]

And Venezuelans would actually profit from it, as opposed to their government nationalized it and had no idea how to run that's true.

[B]

They went from like 90 something to like, in the teens.

[A]

Yep. And it's going to cost a lot. Yeah, it's going to cost a lot. So here's the next claim from Jon Stewart. Well, see what he does here. He tries to paint Trump as inconsistent on the Iranian revolution versus ICE in Minneapolis. He's smarter than this. Just keep that in mind.

[D]

And the most confusing thing about his reason for intervening in Iran is his reason.

[A]

President Trump has warned of striking Iran if the regime kills protesters. There seem to be some people killed that aren't supposed to be killed.

[D]

We may have to bomb Iran to prevent Iran's government from shooting protesters. Look directly into camera with an expression of half bewilderment and despair. P.S. john, don't read this part.

[A]

So here's the truth. John knows better. That's a stupid take. He understands the difference between protesting and a revolution. He also understands the difference between an ICE officer doing their job, shooting a lunatic who had been disruptive, committing felonies throughout the day and attempted to run him over. Jon Stewart understands the difference between that and the Islamic Republic of Iran that has reportedly killed more than 10,000 people. Anywhere from 1,000 to 16,000. Your guess is as good as mine. I think Jon Stewart knows the difference. That's the regime chasing people down. Again, we can't confirm the numbers because the official numbers were 500 to 1000 and then I've seen. But it's well into the thousands.

[B]

So sad, man.

[A]

Yeah. And to be clear, I don't think that President Trump does anyone any services when he calls it a protest or calls them protesters. No one else is referring. These aren't protests. This is a revolution. You can't peacefully protest a government that executes those who speak out against the regime. I think we all understand that difference. Peaceful protest in the United States is, of course, appropriate, especially when you're not being executed, which, by the way, is taking place nowhere in the United States. Targeting leftists. It's just not a thing. You don't run over anyone with your car, you're fine.

[B]

Take it from the leftist point of view. You go, oh, at worst, it's a sticky situation that happened in Minnesota, right?

[A]

Yeah. At worst, let's call it a gray area.

[B]

A gray area versus thousands upon thousands being killed for just being out, not doing. They didn't run over anybody.

[A]

Well, now it's a revolution.

[B]

Well, now they're. Now they're burning down buildings and stuff.

[A]

And it's. And I'm okay with it. I don't expect the Iranians to be peaceful. To be clear, I don't expect them to be peaceful protesters. And I don't think, no, you're not.

[B]

Gonna get anything done.

[A]

It's a revolution. There's a big difference. And you've been removed from that because you live in the greatest country on earth. You don't really know what armed revolution looks like. You see that all the time in South America. You see that all the time in the Middle East. You're very fortunate. Count your blessings. By the way, we have this breaking. I guess as we were just going live, President Trump posted this on Truth Social. He wrote, iranian patriots, keep protesting. Take over your institutions. Save the names of the killers and the abusers. They will pay a big price. I have canceled all meetings with Iranian officials until the senseless killing of protesters stops. Help is on its way. Miga. I love migas. They're fantastic with the crunch. But in this case, President Donald J. Trump. And I am curious as to where you line up on this. I know that some people think this is a Mossad operation. Oh, gosh, there's a lot of propaganda out there trying to convince people that the, the Iranian people support the regime. And so they tried out videos from 20 years ago or AI videos. I'm curious as to where people line up right now. I think the tides have turned where people, you know, and hey, if Mossad even does provide them with some weapons. Yeah, guess what. Good, good. We talked about this yesterday.

[E]

I'm not surprised that the CIA and Mossad are both like, well, yeah, this aligns with our interest. Of course we're gonna jump in with this protest as it started out now in this revolution and support these guys. I want them to support them. And I want our president saying, stop what you're doing. I want him making threats. I want him to put 25% tariffs on. I want that.

[A]

Yeah, that's a very long term solution to a very acute problem. None of that was the tariff.

[E]

Isn't the tariff basically signals to them you're done? You cannot function as an economy with that kind of tariff, that kind of fall in their currency, all of that. It's like, listen, I will just keep ratcheting up the pressure. Maybe you ought to take that flight to Moscow.

[A]

Yeah. But I do think when he says, hey, if you shoot anyone who shouldn't be killed, he has to go in, he has to do something. Otherwise you end up. You end up with a repeat of the Kurds, where it's like, hey, if you, you guys Overthrow Saddam. We got your back and we didn't. Now, whether you support foreign intervention in any capacity or not is not relevant to the point that it is a moral imperative. If you promise people that you are going to back them up and so they act on that promise, you do need to deliver. Otherwise these guys will be.

[E]

And when I say going out and dry, I don't mean necessarily like sending troops in. I'm saying you have to do something.

[A]

Yes. Yeah.

[E]

You have to back up your rhetoric.

[A]

Yeah. I think strategic surgical strikes right now so that they can finish the job would be entirely appropriate. And I think that that could result in an entirely new map as it relates to the instability in the Middle East. No, it's not lost on me. It won't last very long. Maybe it'll last. It could last long with Iran, but there'll be other factions, there'll be other alliances. Because it's the Islamic world. It's the Islamic world. They never get it right. Here's the next claim from John Stewart. He moves on to Greenland and Denmark and just watch. I'm a fan of Denmark, but you know, the fact that they had a boat land there 500 years ago doesn't mean that they own the land.

[D]

Can someone pass him a note? How do you think we got our land? We left, landed here on a boat 500 years ago, and it was ours.

[A]

Well, sure, sure. But here's the truth. John Stewart knows that they're nothing alike. Colonialists landed on, died for, developed the American continent. It's only ours as long as we can defend it. Which is why people discuss the Monroe Doctrine, to be clear. Now, you can also, by the way, do all of South America. You can go through the Conquistad. We're not unique with this. They always blame the United States for doing something that has happened across the rest of the world. There are plenty of other nations and, by the way, territories, Greenland included, who only exist because of American goodwill. When people talk about Greenland and Denmark, if you're mad about us coming here and taking land from the natives, you do know that Greenland is 90% native. Like Inuit. Oh, boy. 10% other. So why are you okay with the Danish, the whitest people on earth, being in control of it? There. That's the modern equivalent to. This isn't their land, man. Where are you on that one? Let's just apply it equally. Here's the next claim. Of course, he somehow has to tie in with January 6th. They were peaceful people. These were great people. Went to the Capitol peacefully protesting a Stolen election. I have never seen such spirit and such passion and such love.

[D]

But while they were there, Capitol Hill.

[C]

Police officers instigated the violence that day.

[D]

So the people we saw earlier beating the out of police officers were hardworking, loving people provoked by law enforcement. And ultimately they deserve a full part. Got it. Don't agree that's what actually happened or what should have happened afterwards, but at least it sets a precedent to January 7th. We've all seen that footage. I think I know what I saw that day, too. But let's go through it again with the correct interpretation. On January 7, a highly disrespectful, deranged.

[B]

Lunatic woman, professional ice agitator, domestic terrorist.

[D]

Did what this woman used her car.

[A]

As a weapon, tried to run over.

[D]

An ICE agent, an attempted murder, and so she was shot and killed. So while very little of the descriptions that you were saying matched what we all saw on the tape, really the important lesson here is what she brought it upon herself. Mother, we are in a confusing, dark place. And this is where, quite frankly, rule of law and institutions are kind of an important framework.

[B]

Ah, I think now that those are.

[D]

Gone, what's our North Star?

[A]

Do you see any checks on your power on the world stage? Is there anything that could stop you if you wanted to? Yeah, there's one thing. My own morality, my own mind.

[D]

So nothing.

[A]

So, gosh, there's a lot to address there. But let me hit you with the truth. It's precisely this type of. And I get that Jon Stewart is not news, it's entertainment. It's precisely this kind of disingenuous presentation, both from Jon Stewart, the entertainment industry and the news media. Trump is the answer to that. That's why he was elected. Black Lives Matter started up before President Trump. I remember people that changed my minds in debates that I've had on this show. People say, well, that happened under Donald Trump. No, no, no, no. The assassination of Dallas pd Remember, that took place before Donald Trump. He promised law and order because the public was lied to repeatedly when they were facing violent riots and protests. And here's something that I would like to ask you. Can you point me to any other instance where the left and people like Jon Stewart are siding with officers, are siding with law enforcement outside of January 6th. Can you point me to any something else that I'd like to point out? All the references we make available, Every single show, something Jon Stewart doesn't do. The way he built that montage is very dishonest. So to use an apples to apples comparison, when we built a montage, for example, on those on the left supporting the Summer of Love, the riots taking place, the George Floyd riots. We showed each individual leftist Democrat in context, making their statements. So, for example, you would have Kamala Harris saying, they're not gonna stop and nor should they stop. This is how they're voiced. Then we had Sheila Jackson Lee. We would have, I believe, Cory Booker. We'd have people in the media. What we didn't do was start a portion of the phrase off with Donald Trump and then finish that phrase with a clip from someone else. That wouldn't be in line with what Donald Trump said. Donald Trump there didn't say domestic terrorist. How do we know what he said? Because he said professional protester, professional agitator. That's different. One approach, saying, Here's 15 people giving a full statement on these riots. One is to inform you and to provide you with a preponderance of evidence. The other is to mislead you and trick you in a very subliminal way into believing that Donald Trump said something that he didn't say. Comment below. Let me know if you understand that difference, because it's something that everyone here works hard as far as to try and abide by those. Those codes of ethics. And this, too, is a comedy show, by the way, when he talks about January 6th and he makes this comparison again. One other example. Can you think of any other example? Do they side with law enforcement on Mike Brown? They side with law enforcement on George Floyd. They side with law enforcement on Tamir Rice. Are they siding with law enforcement now? No, just January 6th. Well, it's interesting because January 6th is the one example where justice was completely ignored at a systemic level. That's the one where they support law enforcement. You had inflated charges. You had no due process. You had cruel and unusual punishment. And by the way, this was across the board with many Americans who did nothing more than take part in a walking tour for which they were invited in. You can't say that systemically about George Floyd and Derek Chauvin or Mike Brown and Darren Wilson. Inflated charges. There was no due process. They didn't have the proper investigation. There were people arrested without due process, put in jail. You cannot say that about any of those other examples. You can disagree as to whether it was a good. A good shoot or a good action from the officer or not. But the one example where we can see systemically there was corruption and American citizens were robbed of their constitutional rights is the one where they side with law enforcement. I would ask you who supports the Gestapo. Remember, this is the same media who again condemned, in every other instance possible, law enforcement, but hailed the cop who shot Ashley Babbitt as a hero. Have you thought about the damage, the human damage?

[G]

Is this taken irreprehensible? The damages, the mental stress, the emotional stress, the suffering, the morale, all of those things. After such an event like this, you know, it's going to take some time. It's going to take some time, and I hope Capitol Police takes the necessary precautions and steps to address those issues.

[A]

Were you afraid that day?

[G]

I was very afraid. There's nothing wrong with being afraid. I've learned that.

[A]

Are you afraid now?

[G]

I am afraid because I know there's people that disagree with my actions on January 6th. But I hope they understand I did my job and there was imminent threat and danger to the members of Congress.

[A]

And I'll do something here that Jon Stewart wouldn't do. I don't even think that that man is the bad guy. I don't even think that he's a villain. I do. I believe him when he says that he was afraid there was a window broken. I certainly think that if you're going to make the argument imminent threat, imminent danger, someone currently accelerating toward you in their car would be a better case than someone down the hall. But I also understand he didn't know where that would go. Okay, are these people gonna break through? Do we have an exit strategy? And he could have panicked, just to be clear. So let's take more clear examples. Again, keeping in mind that this is the only instance where the left supports law enforcement, including Jon Stewart. How does he follow lockstep? How do they make the same mistakes all the time? Let's Compare Renee Goode versus someone specifically, January 6th. A man named John Strand. Okay, so let's compare. Good stocked ice, obstructed justice, disobeyed lawful orders to exit the vehicle, attempted to hit the officer would qualify, bordering on domestic terrorism. Okay, let's Contrast. John Strand. January 6, Simple Trespass, Less Than 30 Minutes Inside the Capitol building. Committed no violence against police or anyone. Committed no property damage, was sentenced to 2.5 years in prison and spent four months in solitary confinement. Jeez.

[G]

Holy shit.

[A]

So people go, well, at least he's alive. No, no, that's not what we're talking about. We're talking about when you say jackboot thugs, when you say Gestapo, when you say these people are not afforded due process, when you say systemic discrimination, corruption, would you apply that more aptly to a lady guilty of all those Crimes currently attempting to hit, whether knowingly or unknowingly, an officer to someone who went in on a walking tour for 30 minutes, who committed no act of violence, not even any property damage, which means he didn't even litter, getting two and a half years in prison and spending four months in solitary confinement. And could you point me to any other example where that kind of sentencing, that kind of treatment, that kind of lack of due process take place in the public eye in America, let alone be supported by those on the left? Any examples? Comment below. I just. I'm just looking for one. Just one. And so here's my issue with Jon Stewart and people of his ilk. They have created this world, the media entertainment industry complex, which is collapsing, by the way. And these are kind of old rules. They expect you to play by those same rules. They're not able to deal with you. They're not able to deal with people who are fluid, mobile, able to get information to you in real time, able to correct journalistic malpractice. So they just ask that you ignore it. He treats his audience like they are morons. I treat you. I attempt to. To treat you like you know better. That's why I give you the references. I know many of you don't check them, but I make them available and I really hope you do. I encourage you to do so. We have a daily admonish button which is used with great fervor for Gerald is Jon Stewart.

[B]

Yeah, I was going to say he needs one, actually.

[A]

No accountability whatsoever. And when you see that these people will support the removal of due process of rights, that there are no values that root them in any type of a sensible worldview, and that you could be the victim of that political targeting. It could be a president being impeached with no precedent. It could be American taxpayers being targeted by the irs, as we saw under Barack Obama, for attending Tea Party protests, or parents being targeted for PTA meetings where they don't want transgender bathrooms. When you know that the left will support full stop, all the time, those violations of your rights, are you starting to see the importance of tribalism? Are you starting to see the reason that even if you disagree with people on the right and there are rhinos, and I hope that we kick them out, that we vote them out, you need to operate within the tribe to correct it, to improve it, and not hopscotch, all of those people to link arms with. I don't know. Ro Khanna, as I've seen suggested, because what do you think happens if you choose to find common ground with people on the left and you grant them power, they're going to consolidate that power and this is the kind of world that you're going to live in. If Democrats were the party of the poor, as they told you, it's in their best interest to keep you poor. If Republicans were the party of the rich, it would be in their best interest to ensure that you are wealthy and maintain wealth. And really that means, you know, upper middle class. The truth is the billionaire class, they overwhelmingly vote for Democrats. It's the same thing with John. They, they want to keep you dumb. They want you to remain uneducated. It's why they don't provide context. It's why they knowingly deceptively edit their clips as you saw there. It's why they don't give you references and it's why they use comparisons that are less apt, less applicable than comparisons that are readily available. That's my issue with Jon Stewart, even though he is very funny. And by the way, we're going to continue obviously on today. If you are not a Rumble Premium member, Mug Club is Rumble Premium. Rumble Premium is Mug Club. You can Click that button $99 annually or $9.99 a month but you don't get this wonderful hand etched mug. You get everything ad free. You get 100% more show and you get all these other creators right there. It's your best one stop shop. If not, if we haven't earned your support, we are entirely supported by viewers like you. When you don't support us, hey, we go away and we decided to. We signed up, we saw, we saw the ride, we bought a ticket anyway. So we're supported by you. We'll be here as long as we are supported by you. If we haven't earned your support today, allow us to do it tomorrow, 11am Eastern every single day. Otherwise you can continue watching and go to Tim Pool. It's free but we're going to go to Rumble Premium because I don't know if you. Oh, did you have something breaking, Gerald?

[E]

Well, yeah, we've got a number of things. So we want to save this information for tomorrow. This next segment that we were going to do.

[A]

The Labor Nazis.

[E]

Yes, the Labor Nazis. There's just too many things happening right now. We can go out on some audio word salad of Ketanji. Is it Brown Jackson?

[A]

John Ketanji, Brown Jackson.

[E]

Is it the lady on the Supreme Court who talks like Kamala Harris?

[A]

Are they talking about, is this the gender thing?

[E]

Is the gender boys and girls.

[A]

So are they already issued there?

[E]

No. This is just her being stupid. So trust me, there's a lot. Okay.

[A]

And for those of you who don't know, I know that there's a. I believe it's from West Virginia. It's going to the Supreme Court of a transgender young athlete wanting to compete saying they can't keep me from beating the shit out of women. So let's hear Katanji Brown Jackson, and then we'll see all of you, of course, in Rumble Premium go hit us Noodles classification.

[C]

And so to the extent that you have an individual who says what is happening in this law is that it is treating someone who is transgender, but who does not have because of the medical interventions and the things that has have been done, does not have the same threat to physical competition and safety and all of the reasons that the state puts forward.

[A]

What the is she even saying?

[F]

Marketing is hard, but I'll tell you a little secret. It doesn't have to be. Let me point something out. You're listening to a podcast right now and it's great. You love the host. You seek it out and download it. You listen to it while driving, working out, cooking, even going to the bathroom. Podcasts are a pretty close companion. And this is a podcast ad. Did I get your attention? You can reach great listeners like yourself with podcast advertising from Libsyn Ads. Choose from hundreds of top podcasts offering host endorsements or run a pre produced ad like this one across thousands of shows. To reach your target audience in their favorite podcasts with Libsyn Ads, go to Libsyn ads.com that's L, I B S Y N ads.com today.