Transcript
A (0:00)
On Fox 1 now you can stream.
B (0:02)
Your favorite live sports so you can be there live for the biggest moments.
A (0:06)
Touchdown and catch history in the making. Fox One we live for live streaming now.
C (0:15)
Fidelity Active ETFs have the flexibility to shift and transform as markets do the same. So instead of just riding an index, they can seek to outperform it by adapting to market conditions and pursuing new opportunities as they emerge. And while you get the potential outperformance of an actively managed fund, you can still buy and sell it on your terms. Just like any other etf. Markets can change in real time. Make sure your ETF can too. Learn more@fidelity.com ActiveETFs before investing in any exchange traded fund, you should consider its investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Contact Fidelity for a prospectus, an offering circular, or if available, a summary prospectus containing this information. Read it carefully. While active ETFs offer the potential to outperform an index, these products may more significantly trail an index as compared with passive ETFs. ETFs are subject to market fluctuation and the risks of their underlying investments. ETFs are subject to management fees and other expenses. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC Member NYSE SIPC.
A (1:39)
Hey, I'm Kramer. Welcome to Mad Money. Welcome to Craig Markup. My friends, I'm just trying to save a little bit of money out here. My job is not just entertain, but to put it in context. So call me at 1-800-743-CBC. Tweet me at Jim Cramer. When I was running the street.com the online news journal I started in 1995, I found out how hard business could be. Hardly a quarter went by where we could meet our quota for ad revenue, which is why we set up more stable subscription business to cushion the shortfalls. But then one day. One day I got this call from one of the most infamous companies in the dot com era. It was a bit of a summons when I sat down with this guy who was rich as Croesus. He said he wanted to do all sorts of things with me. An Investment advise, the works.comnirvana. I sense pure greatness. Lucre. Just the imprimatur alone would be a home run. I could see the headlines. But then I heard the other side of the deal. In exchange for the investment, I I take the money and buy a requisite amount of goods from his company. Basically, I was being asked to make his quarter seem pretty circular and pretty fishy, but both end up looking great. I told him I wanted to speak to my lawyer first and you know what? My lawyer shot it down immediately. He said, you can't invest in a company that gets your money back in your own wares. That's what's called a lazy Susan deal. And these can be fraught from an investor and a legal point of view. My lawyer told me never to speak to that person again. Never. Not long after, this man's company got crushed as part of the dot com collapse. Thank heavens. Thank heavens I didn't deal with them. So in a day where we keep hearing that there's a bubble brewing in artificial intelligence world, I come back and tell you that the bubble's been bursting for weeks now, and we're now getting a lot of the signals that we saw back in the dreaded year 2000. Believe me, I was in the scrum then. It has a major impact today with The Dow slipping turn 28 points, S&P tumbling 1.16, the Nasdaq plunging 1.81%, all because of the stock. These days, we're constantly hearing about what I call these lazy Susan deals, except they're being celebrated as good news for both parties. Today, for example, we learned that OpenAI some talks to raise at least $10 billion from Amazon, some of which would be spent on Amazon's AI chips. We heard applause for this all day. Basically, Amazon's giving Open air at least $10 billion, even as OpenAI has a very stretched balance sheet with huge obligations that dramatically exceed its ability to bring in cash. In return, OpenAI will spend that money on Amazon's chips instead of maybe using Nvidia's. Doesn't that raise some eyebrows? Wouldn't it be better, more natural, say, for Open Air to just pay for the chips itself? Or are we breaking out the lazy Susan table again like in 2000? Oh, I sure hope not. Amazon's a serious company. I don't know why it would pay Open Air to use its own chips. I found the whole thing quizzical, very similar to the deal that I turned down from that giant.com company at the end of the Internet bubble. I know that Amazon Web Services and OpenAI had an existing partnership from early November where OpenAI committed $38 billion for a multi year deal to run its workloads in AWS. Does Amazon's $10 billion payment to OpenAI help OpenAI pay for that agreement too? Now, it's entirely possible that people want to be involved with Sam Altman's Open Air so badly that they're willing to invest in that company to get the money. Right back. But I'm growing ever more concerned that these kinds of deals and as you shall see later on the show, I'm starting to think that OpenAI is not that special. With no moat around Chachi P and the deals are bad. It's getting a real run for its Money now. Chat CBT that means the most valued $500 billion valuation may be off the mark and people shouldn't be valuing at that high. Certainly not the investors. I'm not saying that things are falling apart in this part of the financial world, but I am saying that as the bubble bursts and it is bursting, we're going to see discipline at work because most companies have survival instincts. This morning the Financial Times broke this terrific story that said Blue Al Capital is refusing to back a $10 billion deal for a planned Oracle data center in Michigan. Not that long ago I interviewed a blue executive who talked about the disciplined way it approaches investments. I believe the discipline is why Blue Hour fused to do the deal. I salute them. This story comes right as Wall Street Journal is questioning Oracle for relying on a squishy number a $300 billion five year agreement with again open AI. Oracle didn't formally announce the contract, but it put it in what's known as the remaining performance obligation line, which for me, which for many means is basically a done deal. Some of us regard that as almost cash in the bank. Boy, we look silly. Or at the time of the announcement, the market assumed that the contract was worth its weight in gold. So oracle stock jumped 36% in a single day back in September. They've been update they've been other contracts in the remaining the RPO remaining forms obligation line now stands at 5 and 23 billion. But Oracle stock has gotten crushed as we found out more about that open air relationship and how fraught it is becoming these days. Investors are feeling pretty darn dubious about it, which is why Oracle stock got shelled again, falling more than 5% 178 and change. That's down from $345 at its all time high just a few months ago. The stock has now wiped out most of the value it gained when Oracle decided to become king of the data center. Builders will give up the rest. Yes, if it doesn't stop the spending and gets discipline Oracle and open air killing the data center cohort for certain. So what does mean for you? Remember last night I said that we have a Godfather situation going? There are five families. Metta, Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft and then the fifth which is Oracle OpenAI fourth of the four of these companies are spending fortunes, but it's of their own cash. And it's in part to stop OpenAI which behaves like it has unlimited capital, but it doesn't open. Reckless spending can't be maintained without the help of others, which is why it keeps doing deals like the one we just learned about with Amazon. Some call these kinds of deals circular transactions. Other call them vendor financing. To me it seems like a lazy Susan transaction of.com your and that's why I'm saying the bubble popped a while ago and now it's deflating quickly. That's good. We want companies doing rational things, not delusional things. We want discipline. With Blue out pulling out from an Oracle data center after Blue, our stock was clocked over balance sheet concerns Discipline is coming. We aren't there yet. Press reports indicate that there are other sources of financing and Blue House not needed. I wonder how much open air is really worth if all the powers that be, including Oracle, exercise discipline as the bond market seems to have lost its appetite for Oracle's debt and surveys show that Chat CBD is barely ahead, in some cases falling behind what is starting to look like a very commoditized business. Let's not get caught in the weeds though. The whole AI industry seems to be concerned that OpenAI may not be worth 500 billion even though it has 1.4 trillion spending commitments, which is why I think it keeps doing what looks to me like lazy Susan deals. Now Oracle stock has collapsed because they're doing so much business with OpenAI and that pain has spread to the entire data center complex. I think that's probably wrong. And discipline will reign in the out of control capital expenditure budgets from all the hyperscalers. They'll slow down, be more prudent and not trash their own balance sheets. When discipline arrives, it'll be a huge win for the industry. You will then be able to buy in video and Broadcom again. It's just that the losses have to stop first. You need to see Oracle blink first. That's the Sunny Corleone toll Blue situation writ large. Bulls have to hope that Micron's strong enough. The numbers tonight can help. I don't know until we know for sure. The bottom line is these stocks are will keep getting hit sooner or later. I think we'll get a Godfather style truce on spending and then everyone can benefit. But it's simply not safe to bet on these stocks yet until someone says no to these kinds of circular deals and calls them for what they really are lazy Susan deals that my lawyer told me, don't you dare even think about doing, let alone actually taking the money and giving it back discreetly in goods and services to pump up the quarter and the valuation. Daniel, Massachusetts. Daniel. Hi, Jim. Good evening. Thank you very much for taking my call. I appreciate. My pleasure. Thank you. Daniel, Little fired up here. What's going on? First of all, I want to wish you and your family a merry Christmas. You're a great guy. Thank you. Thank you, buddy. I appreciate that. What's going on? How can I help you? Listen, I'm calling about the streaming giant Roku. What do you think about Roku? I like it. I'll tell you, it's got a lot of lady, a lot of positive chatter about the numbers. It's just been going up, up and up. And I think it makes sense because that's where the advertisers want to be. Pressley in Florida. Pressley. Hey, Jim, I'm Presley, like Elvis from Jacksonville, Florida. I have a quick question about take two interactive. Sure. GTA 6 delayed to fall 20, 26 or later. What changes are, as you've taught us, baked into the price? And is a successful GTA release going to bolster the share price enough to be worth absolutely absolute? It's the greatest entertainment franchise of all time. I think you can buy some here and buy some little lower Strauss. Zellnick will deliver for you. He will. Don in Florida. Don, booyah. Jim, how are you? I am good, Don. How about you? I'm great. Jim. I am a club member and I watch your show every night. I wouldn't miss it. Thank you. Thank you very much. Let's go to work. Here's my question. Here's my question. Robinhood, it's off, you know, over 20% from its highs right now. Do you think is it a buy, sell or hold? Okay, this stock just went up. Like just, I mean, straight up. And now when they start coming down, when they've been straight up, they don't stop as fast as you'd like to see. That's why what we're going to do is let Robinhood come down below that last dip, which took it down to 103. Maybe you go to, say 95 and then pull the trigger. If not, then just say you missed it. All right. Until someone finally calls out the deals we're seeing with OpenAI as lazy Susan deals. Well, I just think it isn't safe to invest in many of these AI stocks. But it's going to happen. Discipline is coming all my money. Tonight, Medline came public today. The biggest IPO the year and with the stock soaring out of the gate, is the valuation too rich for you to get a piece of the deal? Then the most forward, straightforward way to find earnings per share growth is to turn to the buyback monsters. I'll reveal the names that made my list and how are consumers really feeling about the AI chat bots? Is there a moat around ChatGPT? I'm talking 100x to hear what the research is signaling and it is always methodical and empirical. So stay with Kramer. Foreign.
