Podcast Summary: Making Sense with Sam Harris

Episode #402 — The Geopolitics of Trump 2.0
Release Date: February 28, 2025
Host: Sam Harris
Guest: Scott Adams
Co-Guest/Contributor: Neil Ferguson

Introduction

In episode #402 of Making Sense with Sam Harris, host Sam Harris engages in a deep dive into the geopolitical landscape shaped by Donald Trump’s second term as President of the United States. Joined by Scott Adams and Neil Ferguson, the discussion scrutinizes Trump's administration through historical analogies, examines shifts in international alliances, and explores the internal dynamics of American foreign policy.

Comparing Trump’s Second Term to FDR’s First Term

Scott Adams opens the conversation by drawing a parallel between Trump's presidency and Franklin D. Roosevelt's first term in 1933:

Scott Adams [01:24]: "I think it's a bit like being in 1933... it's like the New Deal with the sign reversed."

Adams highlights the unprecedented surge in executive orders under Trump, akin to Roosevelt’s active use of executive power. However, unlike Roosevelt’s goal to expand the federal government amidst the Great Depression, Trump aims to reduce federal size post-COVID economic boom. This comparison sets the stage for understanding the frenetic pace and reversed objectives of Trump’s governance.

Confusion and Bewilderment in Foreign Policy

The discussion shifts to the bewilderment experienced by international allies and adversaries regarding Trump’s foreign policy decisions:

Scott Adams [03:23]: "I asked a quite large audience in London earlier this week if anybody could say confidently that they understood the foreign policy of the Trump administration, and not a single person raised their hand."

Adams points out the lack of coherent foreign policy direction, exemplified by Trump's contradictory statements about Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Trump's labeling of Zelenskyy as a dictator and seemingly conceding to Putin's demands has left both allies and historians perplexed about the administration's strategic intentions.

European Allies Shift from Dependence to Self-Reliance

A significant outcome of Trump’s foreign policy is the changing stance of European allies towards their own defense responsibilities:

Scott Adams [09:27]: "The Europeans have finally realized that the post1945 international order is over and they will now have to stop talking about strategic autonomy and actually doing it."

Adams explains that Trump's approach has jolted Europe into acknowledging the necessity of increasing their defense spending and taking greater responsibility for their security. This marks a departure from decades of European reliance on the United States for defense under NATO, signaling a potential realignment of global power dynamics.

Realism vs. Idealism in American Foreign Policy

The conversation delves into the philosophical underpinnings of American foreign policy, contrasting liberal idealism with ruthless realism:

Scott Adams [11:29]: "In the world of great power politics, you can't be motivated by those moral considerations because what matters is national interest and power."

Adams argues that Trump's administration embodies a more realistic approach, acknowledging the limits of American power amidst rising global competition, particularly from China. This perspective diverges from the idealistic vision of the United States as a "shining city on a hill," suggesting a shift towards a purely interest-driven foreign policy.

Economic Power Shift: The Rise of China

A critical point of discussion is the economic overtaking of the United States by China:

Scott Adams [12:39]: "In 2001... American manufacturing value added was more than twice that of China. Today, China's is more than twice that of the United States."

Adams emphasizes the significant reversal in economic fortunes, highlighting China's ascendancy in manufacturing and overall economic power. This shift challenges the traditional dominance of the U.S. economy and underscores the limitations of American influence in a rapidly changing global landscape.

Internal Conflicts Within the Trump Administration

Neil Ferguson expresses concern over the appointments made by Trump, suggesting a lack of qualified individuals in key positions:

Neil Ferguson [27:52]: "He has appointed loyalists above all, and people whose CVs don't really shriek their qualifications..."

Ferguson criticizes the inclusion of figures like Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel, labeling them as unqualified and ideologically driven. This internal discord raises questions about the administration’s capability to effectively manage foreign policy and respond to global challenges.

Ferguson’s Law and Its Implications on U.S. Power

Scott Adams introduces Ferguson’s Law, which posits that excessive public debt servicing undermines a great power’s strength:

Scott Adams [20:21]: "If a great power is spending more on interest payments on its debt than on defense, it won't be a great power for much longer."

He cites historical examples where nations like Habsburg Spain and the Ottoman Empire declined due to similar financial strains. Adams notes that as of 2024, the U.S. has spent more on debt interest than on defense for the first time since 1934, signaling a potential weakening of its global standing.

Critique of Biden Administration’s Foreign Policy

The conversation contrasts Trump’s policies with those of his predecessor, Joe Biden, whom Adams critically assesses:

Scott Adams [20:21]: "The Biden Administration... were a succession of failures of deterrence that produced two major wars that the United States seemed incapable of doing anything to stop."

Adams argues that Biden’s foreign policy led to chaotic withdrawals and inadequate deterrence, creating opportunities for adversaries like Russia and China to exploit American vulnerabilities. This perceived failure sets the stage for Trump’s more assertive stance, albeit with its own set of challenges.

Trump’s Approach to China and Russia: Detente or Deterrence?

The discussion explores Trump’s sometimes contradictory approach towards major adversaries:

Scott Adams [18:30]: "Trump is Nixon's revenge, both domestically and in foreign policy terms."

While Trump maintains a tough rhetoric, he also signals a willingness to engage in detente, especially with China, seeking to reduce military commitments and avoid multi-front conflicts. This ambivalence reflects a strategic attempt to balance assertiveness with pragmatic constraints of American power.

Concerns Over the Stability and Effectiveness of Alliances

Neil Ferguson raises alarms about the impact of Trump’s policies on international alliances:

Neil Ferguson [20:21]: "Trump and Vance are doing their best to fracture any kind of Western alliance against its adversaries."

Ferguson fears that Trump's actions and rhetoric may erode trust among traditional allies, potentially undermining collective security efforts against common threats from nations like Russia and China. This fracturing could leave the U.S. isolated in critical geopolitical confrontations.

Conclusion: The Future of American Geopolitics Under Trump 2.0

The episode wraps up by considering the long-term implications of Trump’s second term on global power structures. The combination of increased executive activity, shifting alliances, economic challenges, and internal administrative conflicts paints a complex picture of American foreign policy. As Europe steps up its defense commitments and China continues its economic rise, the United States faces a pivotal moment in defining its role on the world stage.

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Scott Adams [01:24]: "It's like the New Deal with the sign reversed."
• Scott Adams [03:23]: "People are baffled. They're bewildered."
• Scott Adams [09:27]: "The Europeans have finally realized... they will now have to stop talking about strategic autonomy and actually doing it."
• Scott Adams [11:29]: "What matters is national interest and power."
• Scott Adams [12:39]: "China's economy... has been larger than the U.S. economy for at least eight years."
• Neil Ferguson [12:20]: "But don't alliances matter? Isn't much of our power historically the result of being a shining city on a hill..."
• Scott Adams [20:21]: "The Biden Administration... were a succession of failures of deterrence."
• Neil Ferguson [27:52]: "He has appointed loyalists above all, and people whose CVs don't really shriek their qualifications..."
• Scott Adams [31:35]: "Public debt, though a very attractive device, was ultimately a source of weakness if it got too large."

Closing Remarks

Making Sense with Sam Harris offers a critical examination of Donald Trump’s second term, highlighting significant shifts in U.S. domestic and foreign policies. Through insightful analysis and historical context, the episode sheds light on the evolving geopolitical landscape and the challenges that lie ahead for American leadership on the global stage.

Note: To continue listening to this conversation and access full episodes, visit subscribe@samharris.org and consider supporting the podcast through subscription or the scholarship program for those who cannot afford it.