
Loading summary
Sam Harris
Welcome to the Making Sense Podcast. This is Sam Harris. Just a note to say that if you're hearing this, you're not currently on our subscriber feed and will only be hearing the first part of this conversation. In order to access full episodes of the Making Sense podcast, you'll need to subscribe@samharris.org we don't run ads on the podcast, and therefore it's made possible entirely through the support of our subscribers. So if you enjoy what we're doing here, please consider becoming one.
Conservative Podcast Host
Welcome back to another episode of More from Sam. Hey, Sam, it was nice seeing you a few minutes ago and seeing you again here.
Progressive Commentator
Long time no see.
Conservative Podcast Host
Yeah, we just did a substack live. I thought that was really good.
Progressive Commentator
Yeah, yeah. It actually kind of surprised me that live still feels like something different.
Sam Harris
Right.
Progressive Commentator
I mean, obviously the experience of looking at a camera and talking is identical, but just the knowledge that it's live and that you can't take any of your words back is somehow thrilling or gets your attention. So I like it.
Conservative Podcast Host
We didn't give subscribers much heads up at all. We will do that in the future. But we just had thought of it at the last minute, and anyone who would like to join us for one of those in the future, you can become a subscriber and join us over there. We will give you more time. And I thought it was really cool that we were able to take some questions from the audience and do that in real time. It's a different experience being live than recording, but we'll do more of those and we'll see where we can learn and figure out how to. How to improve those.
Progressive Commentator
Yeah, it was fun. And I think we. We can record them. I don't know. In this case, I think it was just if you were in the room, you were in the room, you know, which is frankly kind of nice, you know, to treat it like a live event as opposed to yet another podcast, you know, piece of content that we're just going to record and put out there. So, you know, I think we should give people a heads up so that they can. They can be there if they want to be.
Conservative Podcast Host
All right. So I woke up this morning thinking about your conversation with Sarah Longwell and Tim Miller from the Bulwark, that media empire they have, and just thinking why it was so well received by your audience. You know, I don't even know what their positions are on most issues, but I'm sure they're more conservative than yours. They're conservatives.
Progressive Commentator
Correct. You know, I Don't even know where there's daylight between us in our views. I mean, yes, they. You would expect there to be differences because they're both formerly Republicans. Right. So they. They're coming from the other side. They're both gay, so that. I mean, I don't know how conservative they could be socially.
Conservative Podcast Host
But my point is, it doesn't even matter. It seems like it didn't even matter anymore. There was such a sense of relief hearing you guys speak together. It's almost like we never really cared about some of those other differences, and we've realized that now we just care about decency, decorum, sanity, having somebody on the other side just see. At least see everything the same way that you see things.
Progressive Commentator
Yeah. Yeah. And also, they're much closer to the political history there. I mean, they're just obviously having spent all their time right of center, they see how Trump and Trumpism bent everything into this awful shape. And they have relationships, many more relationships than I had. They got distorted by these changes. So, yeah, it's great to talk to them. I'm just a huge fan of both those guys, and they're just very fun.
Conservative Podcast Host
And they're so trustworthy and likable. They just feel like, you know, listening to the three of you talk, it just felt like, you know, three of my friends were getting together, and I'm certain the audience felt the same way that there was this fomo. Like, I just. I wish I could have been there with you guys. I saw a comment on YouTube and thought this was a nice note from them. It says, as a progressive, I probably don't agree on many policy issues with Sarah and Tim, but I have come to trust them to tell it straight over almost anyone else, including most of the progressive podcasters I listen to. So, I don't know. I mean, I'm. It just seems that everybody liked hearing you guys speak. I can't help my mind thinking that there, you know, perhaps this. We should make this a quarterly podcast crossover event where, you know, it appears on. On both podcasts. I think the audiences would enjoy it. And then even putting maybe a few live dates together, I'm getting ahead of myself, but I definitely think people would like to see the three of you guys.
Progressive Commentator
I think they're touring. I think they're touring right now. They're going to Minneapolis to do a live event there. I think I noticed. Yeah. So people should check them. I mean, they're taking their podcast on the road to some degree, so.
Conservative Podcast Host
Oh, I am certain they are a lot of Fun to hang out with, so good for them. According to the Wall Street Journal, President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency firm, World Liberty Financial, sounds so official. Sold a $500 million stake to a member of the Emirati royal family shortly before his inauguration last January. Months later, the Trump administration agreed to supply the UAE with highly coveted American made AI chips. Now, we've talked about this before. Is there anything to add with this latest information?
Progressive Commentator
No, it's just as tawdry and as dangerous and as self serving and as corrupt as anyone could have imagined. Right? I mean, the crucial detail here is that we're giving chips, our most advanced chips, to the UAE that does military exercises with China. And these are chips that precisely the chips we don't want China to have. And we're relaxing those security concerns because Trump and his family managed to get hundreds of millions, arguably billions in the transaction. So what's wrong with that? If you pretended to care that Hunter Biden got some money serving on a board in Ukraine that he was not qualified to serve on because of the name association with Joe Biden, and you thought maybe even Joe Biden, in the worst case scenario, got some of that money and you're looking at those emails and when they say 10% to the big guy, you thought, oh, that's a smoking gun. How awful. Let's just destroy this guy's presidency and burn everything down because of how corrupt and unseemly this is. You're that person who cares about the integrity of our politics to that fine degree. Hunter Biden and his grifting are intolerable. And yet now, magically go look in the mirror, see how much you care about a president who's managed to extract billions of dollars over the course of months by materially undermining the leadership role and military preparedness and actual safety of our country on the world stage. Right. I mean, it's just like everything, our alliances have eroded, all of these tariffs. Whether you believe that he's earned 1 billion or 4 billion, depending on whose estimate you trust at this point, he has just sold out our country every which way he could so as to profit and to have his family and friends profit.
Conservative Podcast Host
I know we keep talking about AI, but it seems like the timelines keep moving up daily. I want you to watch this clip from the CEO of Microsoft AI in a recent interview with the Financial Times. Let's play that clip for Sam.
Interviewer
You talk about superintelligence, most of your rivals talk about AGI, artificial general intelligence. Explain the difference between AGI and superintelligence.
Mustafa Suleyman
I prefer the definition that focuses first on what would it take to build a system that could achieve most of the tasks that a regular professional in a workplace goes about on a daily basis. Think of it as a professional grade AGI.
Interviewer
How close are we?
Mustafa Suleyman
I think that we're going to have a human level performance on most, if not all professional tasks. So white collar work where you're sitting down at a computer, either being a lawyer or an accountant, or a project manager or a marketing person, most of those tasks will be fully automated by an AI within the next 12 to 18 months. And we can see this in software engineering. Many software engineers report that they are now using AI assisted coding for the vast majority of their code production, which means that their role shifted now to this meta function of debugging, scrutinizing, of doing the strategic stuff like architecting, of, et cetera, et cetera, putting things into production. So it's a quite different, different relationship to the technology. And that's happened in the last six months.
Conservative Podcast Host
What do you make of that?
Progressive Commentator
Well, so I know Mustafa a little bit, very nice guy, and obviously he's very close to this work. He came from DeepMind, he was one of the founders of DeepMind and moved over to Microsoft. So I think his prognostications are probably as credible as anybody's at this point. It's pretty alarming when you think of the societal implications if in a year we have the complete cancellation of the need for human cognition of the white collar type. I don't know how many people that is, but it's a lot of people and it's basically certainly most of the high status jobs. One of the ironies and surprises here is that the robots are coming for the lawyers and doctors and software engineers before they're coming for the janitors and massage therapists and nurses and plumbers. So if you went to college and incurred $200,000 in debt, and that degree enabled you to get to the rung on the ladder where you're currently standing, it's very likely that part of the ladder is in the process of disappearing. Right? And the entire ladder, I mean, Mustafa is saying that the ladder itself is evaporating. So what he's saying now is in principle already true of the bottom rung.
Sam Harris
If you'd like to continue listening to this conversation, you'll need to subscribe@samharris.org Once you do, you'll get access to all full length episodes of the Making Sense podcast. The Making Sense podcast is ad free and relies entirely on listener support, and you can subscribe now@samharris.org.
Date: February 13, 2026
Host: Sam Harris
Guests: Conservative Podcast Host, Progressive Commentator
In this episode, Sam Harris and his commentators delve into a set of pressing—and contentious—issues at the intersection of politics, technology, and society. The discussion traverses timely topics such as growing political polarization, the corrosion of democratic norms, political corruption (with particular emphasis on recent reports involving Donald Trump and the UAE), the rapid acceleration of artificial intelligence and its impact on white-collar work, and the shifting sense of allegiance and decorum in public discourse. The conversation is candid, timely, and structured to highlight both the gravity and the underlying values at stake.
[01:54–04:16]
The hosts reflect on a recent, well-received crossover conversation with Sarah Longwell and Tim Miller from The Bulwark—figures known for their center-right and conservative backgrounds but also for their criticism of Trumpism.
There’s a sense of relief and appreciation that, despite policy differences, participants shared a commitment to honesty, decorum, and mutual respect.
The conversation reveals a longing in the audience for dialogue characterized by “decency and sanity,” which transcends old partisan divides.
“It seems like… there was such a sense of relief hearing you guys speak together. It's almost like we never really cared about some of those other differences, and we've realized that now we just care about decency, decorum, sanity…”
— Conservative Podcast Host [02:26]
“They’re just obviously having spent all their time right of center, they see how Trump and Trumpism bent everything into this awful shape…”
— Progressive Commentator [02:46]
[04:16–06:28]
Reference to Wall Street Journal reporting that Donald Trump’s cryptocurrency firm, World Liberty Financial, sold a $500 million stake to a member of the Emirati royal family right before his inauguration, followed by the U.S. government agreeing to supply advanced AI chips to the UAE.
The hosts underscore the hypocrisy of those who previously focused on Hunter Biden’s dealings but now ignore or defend direct self-enrichment and potential compromises of national security by Trump and his associates.
“It's just as tawdry and as dangerous and as self serving and as corrupt as anyone could have imagined… we're giving chips, our most advanced chips, to the UAE that does military exercises with China. And these are chips that precisely the chips we don't want China to have. And we're relaxing those security concerns because Trump and his family managed to get hundreds of millions, arguably billions in the transaction…”
— Progressive Commentator [04:44]
“If you pretended to care that Hunter Biden got some money serving on a board in Ukraine that he was not qualified to serve on...go look in the mirror, see how much you care about a president who's managed to extract billions of dollars...by materially undermining the leadership role and military preparedness and actual safety of our country on the world stage.”
— Progressive Commentator [05:30]
[06:28–09:26]
Discussion centered on remarks by Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI, who predicts near-total automation of most white-collar and professional tasks within 12–18 months.
Acknowledgement that professional roles—lawyers, accountants, software engineers—are at higher risk of obsolescence from current AI advances, compared to many hands-on jobs.
The group contemplates the profound implications for social structure, economic stability, education, and individual purpose.
“I think that we're going to have a human level performance on most...professional tasks. So white collar work...most of those tasks will be fully automated by an AI within the next 12 to 18 months.”
— Mustafa Suleyman (Financial Times clip) [07:08]
“It's pretty alarming when you think of the societal implications if in a year we have the complete cancellation of the need for human cognition of the white collar type...the robots are coming for the lawyers and doctors and software engineers before they're coming for the janitors and massage therapists and nurses and plumbers.”
— Progressive Commentator [07:59]
On the desire for decency in politics:
“We just care about decency, decorum, sanity... having somebody on the other side just see... everything the same way that you see things.”
— Conservative Podcast Host [02:26]
On Trump-era corruption:
"He has just sold out our country every which way he could so as to profit and to have his family and friends profit."
— Progressive Commentator [05:58]
AI and societal risk:
“If you went to college and incurred $200,000 in debt... it's very likely that part of the ladder is in the process of disappearing...the ladder itself is evaporating.”
— Progressive Commentator [09:10]
Subscriber Live Event Reflections: [00:36–01:54]
(Hosts discuss the unique energy and audience engagement of live podcasts.)
Political Realignment and Cross-Partisan Trust: [01:54–04:16]
(Analysis of why audiences respond positively to civil, cross-ideological conversations.)
Trump, UAE, and AI Chip Dealings: [04:16–06:28]
(Exploration of recent reporting and comparisons to prior controversy over Hunter Biden.)
AI & The End of White-Collar Work: [06:28–09:26]
(Clip from Mustafa Suleyman, followed by analysis of looming job displacement.)
The tone throughout is reflective, at times urgent, but always grounded in a commitment to rational discourse. The speakers oscillate between personal experience, analytic detachment, and moments of incredulity at the dizzying pace of change in both politics and technology. Their exchanges balance concern with measured insight, particularly as they reckon with the erosion of institutional trust and the unprecedented speed of artificial intelligence advancement.
This summary should offer a comprehensive, engaging recap for anyone who missed the episode, preserving the flow, substance, and memorable content of the original conversation.