Transcript
A (0:00)
Welcome to the Manager Tools podcast for Monday, May 22, 2006. Hi, this is Michael Ozan. On behalf of my partner Mark Horstman and I, welcome to Manager Tools. Today we cover the second in two podcasts on time management. If you're new to the show or you didn't listen to last week's podcast, it's probably worthwhile going back and listening to it first. Otherwise you'll be joining the conversation halfway through and wondering just how we got to this point. To that point, I received some good feedback on last week's show. First, some folks were put off by the fact that the series was cut in two. Some would much prefer to have a self contained podcast that doesn't span multiple shows. That is one show, one topic. Well, Mark and I appreciate that point of view and generally foal heartily agree. We also tend to let the content dictate the length of the show and occasionally the length exceeds the 30 to 40 minute show we shoot for. Well, honestly, we want to do a 30 minute show, but almost always fail. So we'll give ourselves a little slack and say the target is 30 to 40 minutes. In any case, when we do significantly exceed the 30 minute window, we break those long ones into multiple parts. Time management was an example of that. Now that leads me to my second piece of feedback we received. And here I'll have to strongly agree. When the topic is split across multiple shows, identifying that fact up front would avoid the surprise at the end when the show abruptly ends without a conclusion. I didn't do that on last week's show with predictably disappointing results. Sorry about that. And I will definitely keep that point in mind in the future. So with a strong apology and lessons learned, let's get on with the second part of the time management podcast.
B (1:48)
Okay, so you're going to come up with a list of five key priorities and all you got to do is write them down on a clean sheet of paper. After all that analysis, after all that winnowing or aggregating or glomming together, whatever you want to call it, clean sheet of paper, five priorities. Okay? And then on step three, a rough time analysis. And of course 3A is the Drucker time analysis. And this is, this is kind of a fun part. I really like this. Now we're going to look at your calendar and let's just be clear here. If you don't keep a calendar, if you don't have a schedule, you've got no business listening to the rest of this cast. And I'm sorry You've wasted your time this far not having a reporting measurement tool, which is what a calendar is a schedule is for. The most precious resource you have is a gross lack of judgment as a manager. And if you work for me and you thought you'd get away with would affect your bonus at the end of the year, it is unconscionable in my opinion. It's like a surgeon not tracking her patient success. Right. The longevity of our patients after, you know, whether they die of sepsis or whether they go on to a healthy, happy life or literally a company not billing its customers because sending out bills is a form of measuring one's success. Right. If you don't do this, you can't call yourself a professional. And I say that because there are 5% of people, they don't have one. You know, my assistant keeps it, but I don't really know what it is. I just go from thing to thing and she keeps on track, keeps me on track. Absolutely unacceptable. So, okay, enough. I'm off my soapbox. What I recommend is printing out the last three weeks of your calendar in day view, whatever that is in Outlook or notes or whatever. Don't, don't print out a month because that month hopefully won't show everything you're working on in a given day. All the scheduling items and sometimes even a weekly schedule doesn't do it. So I recommend literally 20, 15 days of each sheet being one day long so you can see every single thing on your calendar. Okay. Once you have that, do your best to capture the start and stop time of your workday that day. Now we're go back to step one. Remember, we were thinking about what we were doing during that day. Just having spent a little bit of time thinking about your time a little bit ago will make it easier to say, okay, three weeks ago, about what time did I get into work? Okay. Another neat trick you can use on that is if you want, you don't have to look at your email. Okay. Most managers I know violate the fundamental rule of coming into work and the first thing they do is they sit down and they do email, which is wrong. That's a mistake. The best time that you have of the day is either when nobody's around first thing in the morning or between 7 and 10 in the morning when your brain is freshest. Every psychologist will tell you make your best decisions before noon and arguably before 10am so because most managers are violating that rule, a great way to figure it out is to go back through email, sent mail logs and as long as you're not doing early mail early in the morning the way you used to do it. Mci, you look and see what time you sent your first mail and subtract 10 minutes from that. And that's when you got into work. Yeah, when I did that to one manager, she said, no, no, I'm here for hours before. And I said, well, this one was sent at six o'. Clock. Oh, okay, maybe I wasn't here for hours before that one. So it's, we're using that as sort of a proxy. I'm not suggesting it's right, but it just gives us a start and stop to your day. Okay. By the way, we're not going to talk anymore about email. If I work with an executive, I will say this though. When they tell me what their schedule was, I go back and all the meetings that weren't on their calendar that they say they were in, and then I find emails that were sent during that meeting from their PC. I challenge them and I say, you know What? I've got 15 meetings here that you say you were in that weren't on your calendar that were ad hoc meetings. Great. And I've got emails, all of them during all those meetings that you sent. He says, well, maybe, you know, maybe I wasn't in a meeting. Yeah, you weren't. You were sitting at your desk. It's okay. As long as you know that when you analyze.
