Unidentified Guest or Producer (17:49)

Right now, I'm a little more quiet because I'm on the quiet side of this race. But I'm going to tell you that we, once November 4th comes around, I will tell the story. The story is not just, you know, that it's random that Iran ascended to this place. It is our Muslim American communities. And I'll also say that it's Muslim money. The PACs that have supported Iran or a particular pact that has supported Iran is probably over 80% of Muslim American donors in this country. High net donors, grassroots donors. And I want to make the point that the Unity and Justice Fund pac, which is the Care super pac, was the largest institutional door, a largest institutional donor to the pros Iran PAC in New York.

Mark Levin (18:33)

Did I just hear the pros Iran PAC in New York, Mr. Producer? Hmm. See, she has a lot in common with Katarosin, the bleeding hemorrhoid. She has a lot in common with little Adolf, the pre pubescent Fuentes. They have a lot in common with each other, don't they, America? There's a lot of money involved. As Rush used to say, follow the money. But you know what? In this case, it's follow the mentally unhinged, you know, crowd here is what they are. So I want to play it again, just to be clear on what is funding this Care Council on American Islamic Relations, which is a Hamas front group. It was founded by Hamas operatives. And she's talking about this pro Iran pac. Pro Iran pac, You hear what I'm saying? Pro Iran pac funded mostly, she says, by Muslim donors, including very wealthy Muslim donors. Gee, I thought the Jews had all the money. And yet it turns out the Arabs have all the money and the Muslims have all the money. Right, Qatar. Right. Saudi Arabia. But nonetheless, let's play it again just for the fun of it. Cut 20. Go.

Unidentified Guest or Producer (19:49)

Right now, I'm a little more quiet because I'm on the quiet side of this race. But I'm gonna tell you that once November 4th comes around, I will tell the story. The story is not just, you know, that it's random that Zahran ascended to this place. It is our Muslim American communities. And I'll also say that it's Muslim money. The PACs that have supported Iran or a particular pact that has supported Zihran is probably over 80% of Muslim American donors in this country. High net donors, grassroots donors. And I want to make the point that the Unity and Justice Fund pac, which is the CARE super pac, was the largest institutional door, a largest institutional donor to. To the pros of Ron PAC in New York.

Mark Levin (20:34)

Don't forget Soros. Oh, yeah, and don't mention Zorros Soros. Zorros Soros, whatever. Trying to destroy America. Trying to destroy Israel. What a piece of. You know what that guy is? Here's Zoran Mandami now. One of his ads that his airing is pushing his socialist policies. While speaking in Arabic, he's speaking to Arabs in the Muslim community, pushing socialism. And in the video, he only flies the Palestinian flag. So I'm informing all the voters in New York who vote for him what you're getting into here. And you're getting into something that's very, very bad. Very, very bad. Cut 20. All right. All I heard it was New Jersey. But nonetheless, speaking in Arabic to that specific community, which is fine. But promoting socialist policies so others couldn't understand it, and only flying in this video, the Palestinian flag. Does that concern anybody? It should concern everybody. Everybody. But apparently it doesn't. And so you have a mix of the Islamists and the Marxists. I'll give you an example of a Marxist, in my humble opinion, who hates America, in my humble opinion, Elie Mestal. I've talked about him before. He's in one or two of my books. He writes for the nation, which is a rag, absolute rag. And Elie Mistahl is toxic. His hate for America knows no bounds. His bigoted views of white people is really grotesque. Hence he writes for the nation. Not our nation, somebody else's nation. So you heard, you heard Sassoor, you heard the Arabic and I explained to you what it was about of Mandami's commercial flying only the Palestinian flag. Now I want you to hear some of the other people who support him who are not from other countries, who don't speak Arabic but are on the Marxist side of the spectrum. Cut 26, go. Most of our Constitution, even the amendments, have been written and ratified exclusively by white, rich, land holding men, right? There's not a single state that had a majority legislature of women that has ratified a single amendment in the current constitution, right? So starting from the beginning and pulling that thread all the way through, now, this is a white man's document and it looks like it. So when you ask, like, is the Constitution working as intended? Pretty much. And the intention was to crush the rights and democratic participation of everybody who was not a rich white person. So this is the toxic mess. A mix of a Marxist America hating, Constitution hating bigot, in my humble opinion, and an Islamist Sharia embracing, Jew hating, anti American. They have much in common. Their hate for the country, their hate for the Constitution, their bigoted viewpoints, their hate for Jews, in my humble opinion, by the way, what this clown who thinks he's educated about the Constitution, what this clown won't tell you is that in several states blacks did in fact vote, vote for amendments to the Constitution. But that for another day, that's worthy of a larger discussion, no question about it, but that for another day. And I don't believe they've he's ever said a damn thing on TV about the black Christians being slaughtered by the black Islamists throughout Africa, in Nigeria, I think Donald Trump has said far more about it than this, than this jackass. Or in the Sudan where 200,000 black Christians have been slaughtered. Do you think they care that they were slaughtered by black Islamists? You think that even enters their mind? And the rape and the kidnapping of their children think that enters their mind? Because this guy, this putz, lives in the greatest country on the face of the earth, enjoys capitalism Stands on the shoulders of the people who came before. But he grifts like Carlson, Griffs like Bannon, Griffs like Fuentes, Griffs. They've contributed nothing to this country. 0. They take from it while they trash it. They have so much in common, do they not? Well, this is Mondami. If you get Mondame New York, you're going to lose your city. Nobody's going to want to invest in New York City. People are going to move their headquarters out, and you can't blame them. People are going to try to leave, if they can leave, even though their ties to the city are deep and broad. The entire nature of the city is going to change. You see what's happened in London and Paris. You see it. You're talking about Sarsour Mandami. Their supporters have no intention of assimilating the. Their goal is to conquer and devour. You understand what I'm saying? Conquer and devour and destroy every aspect of the city that has made New York what it is. Despite the leftist Democrats who run the city, New York is the greatest capitalist center on the face of the earth. In spite of all that, that will be destroyed because unlike typical liberals, the ideology that's being promoted here from the Marxists and the Islamists, they intend to destroy the culture, destroy the cops, destroy the communities, destroy private property rights. They even want to destroy things at work. And of course, what you'll attract is the opposite of successful, assimilated individuals. You will attract. I mean, he ran a commercial right for Muslims and Arabs, that's it, with a Palestinian flag. So you'll attract that from all over the country and all over the world, and it'll get harder and harder and harder to win primaries and harder and harder and harder to win general elections. And this is how it goes. This is how it works. Montame doesn't even believe in elections unless he wins them. This is a cultural battle, well beyond politics. Politics has the impact, obviously, but it's a cultural battle. Imagine what they'll do with the teachers unions and in the classroom. Think about it. Imagine what they'll do. You pick up the phone and call the cops, and they're not coming. Depending on your neighborhood, depending on your issue, depending on your skin color, they're not coming. Plus, there's not enough of them. They're going to go to Florida and other states where they're welcome, where they actually get a bonus to help protect people and secure their neighborhoods. And minorities in New York, you're going to suffer the most you're going to be the plaything of the Marxist Islamists. You always are. Your schools are going to sink further, your neighborhoods are going to be more crime ridden because the cops, well, that's who protects these neighborhoods. Your health care system is going to collapse. Who's going to pay the bills? The people who pay the bills. How do you redistribute wealth? When the successful people who are trying to make a living decide, no, it's, you know what I earn, that I get up in the morning, I work hard, or I work at night, I work hard. No, I'm not going to let you take my wealth and give it to somebody else who just showed up in our country, who just came into our city based on race, based on anything else. Ask people, minority neighborhoods in Chicago under a radical mayor, what they think about those policies. Ask them. Mandami is not a uniter. He's a destroyer. He's a destroyer. How's he gonna bring prices down? With a magic wand? You don't have to pay for it. No, you will pay. You will pay. You will pay. So if you vote for Mandami, you're cutting your own throat. It's not the first time in human history. I wrote about it and have written about it many times. People love the way this stuff sounds. It's not possible in New York City that they'll be socialists. It's not possible that they'll get rid of the grocery stores. It's not possible that he'll try and take private property rights and do this and do that and do this and do that. And then they vote for the very person. And then they wonder what happened when they lose their job. They wonder what happens when the shelves are empty. They wonder what happens when their homes are taken. They wonder what happens. Look at Venezuela. Look at Venezuela. There's your Marxist ideology. A military and police state. No food. No food for the vast majority of people. No jobs. Inflation that runs into the hundreds and hundreds of percent. Street gangs and militia that enforce the rules, no civil liberties, death squads. This is the rational, yet horrific outcome over time of what these people are preaching. Mark, the Vin Foreign. You're listening to the best of Mark Levin. You know, it's painful more than frustrating. It's painful to listen to a lot of the analysts out there going about what took place last night. What took place last night is not a surprise, because what happened in New York City, Immigrants overwhelmingly voted for a Marxist Islamist who camouflaged himself as a Democratic socialist who used slogans about affordability and the rich. And this is not new. They've done it in Venezuela, they've done it in Cuba, they've done it all over the third world. And it works. The Democrat Party, their long term immigration program, to change the demographics of the country, to change the population of the country, to change the citizenry of the country is working. That's the bottom line. Even in Virginia, where most the federal employees live, that is in Virginia, even more than in Maryland, that has an enormous effect. Please don't get me wrong. But still, the immigration issue. Virginia has been the recipient of an enormous number of immigrants. And remember, all this occurs without assimilation, which is exactly what the Democrats want. They don't want people coming into the country loving the country, loving our economic system. They want people coming into the country who are dirt poor, largely illiterate, in their own language, who will follow the crowd and vote for freebies. Since the 1965 Hart Celler Act, 1965, this has been the game plan of the Democrats for 60 years. I wrote about this in Liberty and Tyranny. One chapter called on immigration, 60 years, and now it's paying off. The problem is the people who are coming into the country, as we said, are not being assimilated. And so they bring their own culture, they bring their own ideology, they bring their own habits, and so they're not Americanized. This whole notion from many one, it's now just many. And so you have cultures and subcultures. Individuals can choose which culture they want to be in or just stay in their culture. You know, we talk about a nation divided. The real divide is there's no assimilation taking place. Literally none. Not in our public schools, certainly not in our colleges and universities, not on television, not in our politics. No. This organization, care, exists for the purpose of destroying our country, for the purpose of imposing Sharia law on the country. It has a tax exempt status. It sets up a political action committee raising tens of millions of dollars, including from George Soros, who wants to destroy every republic or every democracy there is, I think for money reasons, for power reasons. But it doesn't matter why. That's what he's doing. And he's not alone. We've got foreign money pouring into this country like never before. It's a spigot from Qatar, from Communist China, from Iran, from Hamas, for God's sakes. And it's having an impact. Revolution by immigration. That's how I coined it. That's the phrase, the money pouring in. I've spent years here on TV showing you the money line. The Money, connections. Both parties are in on it. The problem is the money is coming from entities that want to overthrow our government. Islamists, that is radical Islamic Jihadis. They want to overthrow our government. And they're now welcoming the Democrat Party. More than welcome in the Democrat Party. The Democrat Party is now relying on them, depending on them. First they fought it tepidly, then they tried to ignore it, and now they're part of it. Hochul, the governor of New York, Hakeem Jeffries, the leader of the Democrats in the House, Schumer, while he didn't endorse it, he didn't oppose it. That's your Democrat leadership. They created this scenario. They created this situation going back to the Great Society. What's taking place now is really a Barack Obama strategy, and it's working. You watch tv. You're listening. It was affordability. All these people. No, it wasn't. Maybe some of the vote was based on affordability. But socialism, Marxism, that's not about affordability. That's about a poverty. Poverty. I want to thank the New York Post. They did a hell of a job fighting this. They did everything they could in New York. I want to thank our affiliate wabc. They did everything they could to fight this damn thing. And other conservatives and Republicans. But it's here now. So the city is going to decline. The question only is how much. It's not a question of whether it declines. The question is how much in Virginia. Virginia is now part of the federal government. Now, you'll pull out a Republican win every now and then like you do in New Jersey, and I'll get to that in a second. But Virginia is now an appendage of the federal government. Enormous number of federal employees. On top of that, you've got really another Silicon Valley. 80% of all the Internet traffic comes through Loudoun County, Virginia. And if you live in Loudoun county and you drive through particular neighborhoods and streets, you will see these massive buildings that are bigger than football fields. And they are lining these streets one after another after another to the point they don't know how they're going to get electricity to them. Terrible. And many of these people are young liberals, apart from the. The immigrants are young liberals. We had a caller into this program. I forget if it was last evening or the evening before. Nice young man. He said, I'm 20 years old and we really need to focus on the future in my generation. He said, isn't that right, Mr. Producer? It was Monday. The problem is this younger generation not to offend. And many of them do agree with me. They think they have a tough. They weren't drafted into World War II or the Korean War, the Vietnam War. They have access to technologies that people their age 25, 30 years ago never had access to. They think they have a tough. They think they have a tough when they have to do things they don't want to do, when people mistreat them. If they don't have money to buy a certain thing, if they want to live somewhere and they can't afford it, that's not tough. That's life. If you want something, you go out and get it. That's the great, that's the great answer that capitalism provides. If you want something, go get it. Work for it. Think about it. You don't have to be the smartest guy in the room. You don't even have to be the most hard working guy in the room. But you have to be motivated. You have to have a desire. And your motivation and desire shouldn't be to legalize theft by saying, I want what that guy has. That guy's a billionaire. He shouldn't be. You don't even know what that guy who's a billionaire has done, how many jobs they've created, services they've created, and God knows what else. And why does that billionaire even matter in your life? Billionaires nothing to do with you and you have nothing to do with them. Live your own life. Nobody's stopping you. If there's economic worries, if there's economic worries, then why did the people in New Jersey, the majority, certainly vote for a party that has imposed massive property taxes on them and massively has increased their electricity bill? This isn't even being discussed on TV today. Let me repeat it for the slow listeners. If the election was about economics and affordability, then why did a significant majority of the Democrats, perhaps some others in the state of New Jersey, vote for the party that drove up their property taxes and drove up their energy bills? That doesn't make any sense, does it? You, you know, affordability was the issue. Then why would they vote for the party that controlled the legislature for 20 years and the governorship for eight? What is that all about? So that is not the answer. It might be the answer for some people, but it's not the answer. So I'll go back to my premise. The immigration strategy of the Democrats has worked. Their judges at the district court level know it. Their mayors know it. Their governors know it. That's why they refuse to support or cooperate on deportation, even if it means a serial killer, a rapist or whatever. You know, as Mark said, a little bit of despotism, so be it. Because their bigger picture is this is their constituency. The number of people in the state determine the number of congressional districts. It should be citizens, but that's not the way it works. Right now they're banking on the court not having the guts to rule the right way on birthright citizenship. So every baby that's born to an illegal immigrant in this country and there are millions and millions of them, there were before, but now there's even more thanks to the Democrats. Their border was open for a reason, folks. They count on them as being Democrats. They don't care if they're Islamists who are pushing Sharia law. They don't care if there's a significant number of women who are sold into sex slavery. They don't care if there's unaccompanied minors. They can't find 300,000 of them. Hey, hey, hey, hey. It all comes out in the end. This is how they think. This is how they think. Mark Obo vin Israel is at war with Iran, a nation whose leaders have vowed to wipe Israel and even the United States off the map. In a necessary act of self defense, Israel struck Iranian nuclear facilities, military targets and top leadership. Right now the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews is on the ground preparing large scale distributions of life saving food for first aid and emergency kits, especially to Israel's most vulnerable people, the sick, the elderly, children and families in great need. The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews is also making sure that hospitals, emergency rooms and shelters are fully stocked with critical and life saving medical supplies. But the fellowship needs your most generous gift today to make this work possible. Now is the time, ladies and gentlemen to stand with Israel's most vulnerable to rush your gift. Call 888-585 IFCJ and donate today. That's 8585 IFCJ or online at levin for the fellowship.org that's L E V I N for the fellowship.org the great one makes your weekend even better. This is the best of Mark Levin. I want to jump in with both feet on this tariff argument. First we have the Chief justice of the United States. That's the official title under constitution John Roberts cut 19 go. I think this is a question for the other side as well. It's too two facing yes of course dealings with foreign powers. But the vehicle is imposition of taxes on Americans and that has always been the core power of Congress. So to have the power President's Foreign Affairs Power trump that. That basic power for Congress seems to me to kind of at least neutralize between the two powers, the executive power and the legislative power. Let me say two things in response to that. First, the notion that these are the taxes are all borne by Americans that are not borne by foreign. Foreign producers. All right, let me slow down. Stop here. To me, the answer to this is quite simple. We have situations where Congress has delegated the authority of the President. You know, we've had tariffs since the beginning of the Republic and they've delegated authority to the President of the United States to determine tariff levels. And that's relatively recent as well. So according to John Roberts logic, every time that happened, that was an unconstitutional delegation of the taxing authority power of the purse. Where does he draw the line on that if he's going to stick purely in the taxation lane? It's much more complicated than that. What a tariff is and what it's for and the impact of it. And then that's my question. How does Congress delegate that core power? He just said it's a core power. He's not wrong about that. How does Congress delegate that power? And it has through past tariff acts, of which there have been many scores of them, to a President of the United States to make the decision to have the discretion to determine whether powers will apply or how much they'll apply in certain circumstances, beyond emergencies. That's number one. Number two, what did I just say about regulations? Regulations are attacks, and yet every regulation doesn't go through Congress. Well, then John Roberts would say, but Congress has delegated that authority to agencies and departments. Well, Mr. Chief justice of the United States, you just said that's a core power of Congress. Therefore, Congress cannot delegate to another branch of government, whether it's a judge or a president, the power to raise taxes. And yet that's what regulations do. No, and even more so than tariffs, because the people who pay the regulation are American citizens, American businesses. No question about that. In the case of tariffs, Americans might pay them, foreigners might pay them, other countries might pay them, and so forth and so on. So it seems to me this is a black hole that he's trying to go through. Go ahead. Mr. Bedeus is empirically, that's not. There's no basis for that in the record. It's actually a mixed tariffs. If a tariff is imposed on automobiles, well, who pays for the regulations? Who pays for the regulations? When a business is regulated in America and they have to spend money, which they almost always do with a regulation, and there are Tens of thousands of regulations. In fact, the Heritage foundation many years ago did an analysis and said regulations are more expensive than taxation. A trillion dollars worth of regulations virtually every year. And those regulations are issued by the executive branch agencies while they've been delegated that. Well, if that's a core function, you can't delegate the power to tax, not just to a president. You're delegating it to bureaucrats. That would be my reply. Now we have Justice Sotomayor, one of the dumbest. Cut 20 go. I just don't understand this argument. It's not an article, it's a congressional power, not a presidential power to tax. And you want to say so here we have a debate over separation of powers, which is why I began this in the last hour by saying if it's a debate over which political entity has this power, they're insisting these two, that it's Congress. I'm insisting that Congress has delegated certain authorities to the executive branch and this court has never ruled them unconstitutional, not in any significant way, or we wouldn't have a bureaucracy now would we? They can regulate. They're not really making intelligent substantive arguments to me. Go ahead. Taxes. But that's exactly what they are. Degenerating money from American citizens revenue. And you say it's incidental to the regulatory. Now that's particularly interesting. So I guess that means when the Interior Department leases land and makes an independent determination on what that cost is going to be to oil companies, to ranchers, to farmers and so forth and so on, that's clearly unconstitutional, right? Mr. Medusa? I mean, where are they going with this? And again, I said the overlay is these are not purely quote unquote taxes as these two justices imply or assert. Of course they have national security implications. Of course they have economic implications. Negotiating ability of a president with communist China or with the European Union and other countries with the threat of tariffs or the actual implementation of tariffs in the short run or long run. Again, tariffs have been with us since the beginning of the Republic. Tariffs are used for a multiple, you know, multiple reasons. Robert says yes, but at bottom there are tax. Yes, at bottom a regulation is a tax. Go ahead. But I don't see how a quota is equivalent to revenue raising a quota sets a limit to what you can import in. But it doesn't. Well, I guess you're not familiar with your great hero, that court in the Wicker decision that said the. This was a crazy ass decision, but the left loves it because it massively expanded the power of the central Government. Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal. It saved it, effectively. This wicker decision was a decision by the Supreme Court. It's infamous for the left. It's celebrated and famous where they said the lack of commerce means commerce. So if a farmer withholds interstate commerce, that farmer is affecting commerce. And so what Sotomayor is saying here is, go ahead, play it. I don't understand this argument that it's equivalent or that foreign powers or in other words, if you put a. A block on the amount of products that a country can sell into this country, she's saying that's not the same as a tax. Well, let me ask you folks a question. If we limit the importation of goods into the country, doesn't that increase prices? Mr. Producer, the whole point. The whole point of having quotas on products from, let's say, Japan, motorcycles during President Reagan's term, or electronics from President Reagan's terms, or computers from President Reagan's term is to drive up the price domestically in order to build up the industry or to expand the industry. Isn't that a tax? But isn't that also important? There's no fine line between the two. Now, Congress can try and draw it. They haven't. Most of these tariff acts are quite ambiguous. And so for the court to step in here and say, yes, but taxing is. That doesn't answer any questions. And now she's saying if you have a quota, that's not the same thing as a tariff. Well, a quota isn't the same thing as a tariff, technically speaking. But the. Depending on the use of the tariff and the nature of the quota, they cannot be absolutely the same thing in terms of the consumer attacks. Again, what's the point of a quota? Let's say it's a quota on motorcycles. It was to help Harley Davidson survive. That's why Reagan did it. They were dumping motorcycles in the country. So the price of Harley Davidsons went up. That's a tax, technically. Right, but the purpose was not to tax. Their purpose was to improve the motorcycle market for motorcycle production, not necessarily the consumer. So you would save Harley Davidson. Mark the vin. Folks, we're living in a time when America's most cherished values are being challenged. Values like faith, family, and freedom. And that's why I support amac, the association of Mature American Citizens. AMAC is the choice for Americans who care deeply about preserving the principles that have guided this nation for generations. Whether you're concerned about your future, your children's future, or just want to stay informed and connected, AMAC is for you as a member of the association of Mature American Citizens. You'll receive access to fantastic benefits and discounts on travel insurance, prescription services, as well as exclusive member only tools and resources that make a difference in everyday life. And one of my personal favorites, the AMAC magazine, packed with me meaningful content, insightful interviews and updates you won't find anywhere else. Right now you can join for as little as $1.20 a month. Hello. With a five year membership, that's an incredible value. So don't wait. Go to AMAC U.S. mark, and become a member today. Stand with AMAC. Help keep the values we hold dear going strong for future generations. That's AMAC us Mark. We're giving you nothing but the best. The best of Mark Levin. Ladies. Ladies and gentlemen. I want to make a suggestion, a strong suggestion to all the conservative organizations out there, all the organizations that have sprung up over the years, over the decades to defend our society and our culture, to defend our, our republic, who brought lawsuits, who have issued white papers, who sent speakers all over the country, who've been on radio and on a television making the case for Americanism. You owe it to yourselves, your patrons, your donors, your members, and mostly to the country to speak out boldly and to speak out. Now we're up against a vile, poisonous movement on the left and a vile, poisonous movement on the radical right. And when I say radical right, I don't mean conservatives, I don't mean constitutionalists, I don't mean libertarians, I don't mean any of that. I mean fascists, thugs, neo Nazis and their like. I want to say to the heads of our colleges and universities, those who run private institutions in particular, I want to say to those who run think tanks, legal foundations, websites, publications. This is not difficult if you believe in our country. Some of you have said, not many, but some, that you are friends with Tucker Carlson, you've been friends with Tucker Carlson, but Tucker Carlson has left you. He's not your friend. Today he was supporting and promoting Mandan, trashing traditional Christians, Jews at it again. Don't you owe it at least to your own conscience, your own morality to say something? Free speech. That cuts both ways. Free speech doesn't just exist for neo Nazis and Klansmen, for Marxists and Islamists. Free speech exists as we know better than anybody, to counter these people. Because the truth is, if they ever took control of anything, free speech would cease to exist. We're in a war, obviously. Not a shooting war, not a military war, but we are in a war. And People need to take sides. Either believe in the country, the founding, the principles, the declaration in the Constitution, capitalism, private property rights, or you don't. America first is all about America. That doesn't mean we don't have allies that we support. But these people, they're attacking the core of our country. Mandami's victory speech the other night was appalling. You know, I've been accused of supporting this so called replacement theory. The left used to write about me because I said we need to secure our border, we need to vet our immigrants, they need to assimilate into our system. And until that's done, we need to put a break on this replacement theory. And yet, if you listen to Mandami, last night or two nights ago, he was touting his movement as replacement. Not theory, reality. Marxism and Islam replacing capitalism, the Enlightenment and Judeo Christian values that undergird the founding of this country. That doesn't mean people of every faith can't enjoy this country. It just means that's the founding. It is a daunting task, a complicated task now to defeat these people. In certain parts of the country and even throughout the country, they have a foothold. They have billionaires like Soros and more. They have massive amounts of foreign money pouring into this country from the Middle east, from communist China and elsewhere. They run our colleges, our universities. They're indoctrinating them into these horrific ideologies for the purpose of destroying the West. And not all, but much if not most of the leadership, people you might turn to have failed. You have failed us. Now is not the time for word salads. Now is not the time for parsing words. Now is not the time to say, yes, I hate this embrace of Stalin and Hitler and the anti Christianity and anti Judaism. But there are no buts. We are in the proverbial foxhole. No buts, it is them against us. And that includes on the far left and these radical right wingers. We have an obligation to our families, to yourself, to all that we have fought for in these various movements and have argued for over the decades. Your children, your grandchildren, they have a right to live in an America that you and I inherited from our ancestors. Can you imagine after World War II, your grandparents, your great grandparents, having fought for this country, saved this country. Yes, saved Europe, the free world. We're able to finally free the victims who were terrorized in the concentration camps, what was left? If they could hear from Tucker Carlson or Nick Fuentes or Steve Bannon or Owens or individuals who platformed them, what do you think they would say. What would they say? The over 400,000 men and women who died fighting Hitler, that's the greatest generation, is it? Not the greatest generation anymore. A handful of them are alive, just old men and old women. We're supposed to discuss that because we have people in college or high school or recent grads. Old men and old women. We don't listen to them. We think about the future. We're thinking about the future. On the left, they physically tear down our monuments and our history. On this neo Nazi right, they tear them down too, but not physically, because they don't have the guts to do that. No, no, no, no. They're holed up in their basements somewhere in Maine, suburbs of Chicago, wherever they might be, pulling in tens of millions of dollars to spread the most poisonous, cancerous hate. They're making it much more difficult to fight the left. They're going to make it impossible to win elections and stop the mandamis. These are people who have mental, psychological problems. They are sick. They are unhinged. And those who claim to be friends of theirs are not helping them by making excuses for them. Those days are over. They should have been over a long time ago. Every single faith leader, every single president or CEO or executive director of a conservative organization, think tank, legal group, media organization, political group, should be speaking out now, making it abundantly clear that Tucker Carlson and these others don't represent us. They don't represent our family. They don't represent anything we believe in. This isn't about the cult of personality, which is what I'm hearing too often. We're not interested in that. We have a battle on our hands. Unfortunately, we're in a pinser movement here from the Marxist left and the fascistic neo Nazi right. I know where you stand or you wouldn't be in this audience. I know where Mr. And Mrs. America stand. But they're getting into the minds of our children and our grandchildren. We're not assimilating people into our system anymore because the people who control these. These levers of. Of our culture and society are more and more them. They're trying to make Hitler cool. They're trying now to make Mondami cool. And that's Carlson. And look, he's a punk, but he's illustrative. He's illustrative. Sometimes we make him bigger than he is. He's a punk. He's flesh and blood and in my view, mentally ill. Without a soul, without an ounce of morality to say the things he says and to do to our children and grandchildren. What he's trying to do, he's not make America great again, a phrase that was coined by Reagan and then wisely embraced by President Trump. He's not peace through strength. He's surrender in isolationism to his friend Putin, to his friend the Qataris, to his friend the Iranians and now the Islamists. And it's not just him. So if you're listening to this program, you're listening for a reason. If you run an organization, any conservative organization, a faith organization, speak out boldly now. If you've made mistakes, apologize, reverse course before it's too late. Speak out boldly now. Now. Because we people who love freedom, we're not going anywhere. We're going to do pushback now. We're going to counter this. We're going to get our the wind at our back and we're going to build a juggernaut. We're going to embrace one another. We are going to unite against this. It's already happening. It's already happening. It's something I've been trying to organize and push for at least eight months here behind this microphone on the Blaze platform, on Fox and throughout. This will not stand. We are not neo Nazis. We are not Klansmen, we are not Marxists. We are not jihadists. We're not anti Semites, we're not anti Christianity. In fact, we're anti anti all those things. So I say to these people who've asked for donations, who've asked for members going into court, who run websites and all the rest of it, look in the mirror. Who are you? What are you going to do? The time is now. Right now.