Loading summary
Hannah Fry
Enterprises are busy embracing the technologies that underpin Industry 4.0, such as AI and automation. But now the fifth industrial revolution is coming. So what is it and what could it mean for our jobs? I'm Hannah Fry. You can learn more later in the.
Ms. Klein
Podcast from the Delta Sky Club. Welcome back, Ms. Klein, to the JetBridge. Delta Air Lines relies on 5G solutions from T Mobile for business to power operations and serve customers faster. Together we're putting 5G into the hands of ground staff so they can better assist on the go travelers with real time throughout the airport. This is elevating customer experience. This is Delta Air Lines with T Mobile for business. Take your business further@t mobile.com now.
Barry Ritholtz
Bloomberg Audio Studios Podcasts Radio News.
Dana Mattioli
This.
Barry Ritholtz
Is Masters in Business with Barry Ritholtz on Bloomberg Radio.
Dana Mattioli
This week on the podcast, I have another extra special guest. Dana Manioli is the Amazon reporter for the Wall Street Journal. In addition to covering Amazon, she is an award winning reporter who has deep roots in both M and A and retail. Her new book is really quite fascinating. The everything Amazon's ruthless quest to own the world and remake corporate power just came out a few months ago. I thought this was a really interesting book. I read a lot of stuff for interviews and this is a book that I would have just plowed through regardless. It was really fascinating. And you know, a lot of the things you, you suspect about Amazon, you think about, you know, how they flex their corporate muscles. You have like a loose idea, hey, they really seem to be the 800 pound gorilla. I had no idea. You know, as I'm reading the book, I'm just genuinely shocked. And by the way, it's deeply investigated and researched. She did hundreds of interviews with, with former employees and executives and partners and clients, like just everybody who was affiliated with this. And these are not nice people. These are ethically compromised executives who are just hell bent on increasing profits by any means necessary. And she paints a not very pretty picture of the company, its culture, its tactics. Like I thought I knew Amazon and it turns out I really didn't know Amazon. Fascinating book and a really fascinating conversation that I think you'll enjoy. With no further ado, my discussion with the Wall Street Journal's Dana Mattioli. Welcome to Bloomberg.
Barry Ritholtz
Thanks for having me.
Dana Mattioli
So we've been trying to get this scheduled for quite some time. We've been ships in the night and I'm glad we finally did this. Before we get into the book, I just have to go over your background which is really fascinating. You started the journal in 2006. Tell us a little bit about how you got there.
Barry Ritholtz
Oh, I'd say I snuck through the back door. I started a week after graduating from college.
Dana Mattioli
Amazing.
Barry Ritholtz
As a journalism major and an English lit major. I had some freelance clips while I was in college. I would go and take my articles that I wrote for class and sell them to the local newspapers in Washington, D.C. sometimes just give them away to get a byline. And that's sort of how I got hired at the Journal and just really learned as a grunt at that point and, you know, rose up the ranks.
Dana Mattioli
It's kind of fascinating that you're the Amazon reporter now because you began covering retail companies like J.C. penney's. I don't know if it called Kodak Retail. They had a retail arm. Tell us a little bit about some of the companies you covered and some of the front page scoops you got.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, so for a while I was the retail reporter at the Wall Street Journal. I loved that job. I basically covered 30 different publicly traded retailers from Gap to Macy's to Nordstrom and got to know a lot of those CEOs very well. People like Mickey Drexler over at J. Crew. Right. Like legends. And that was a really good education for me, actually, in writing this book because I saw firsthand through their lens of how they had to react to a young Jeff Bezos and how that was decimating their businesses.
Dana Mattioli
Right. You start in 06. At that point, Amazon is what, a decade old? Just about, and had already begun to damage traditional retailers. You go from retail to doing large M and A deals. You covered the Pfizer Allergen deal and a bunch of other M and A. Tell us how you went from retail to mergers and acquisitions.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, there was a stop before that, actually. I covered Kodak, like you said, that was my first corporate gig. And then retail. And then I did. I was the M and a reporter with another reporter named Dana Similuca, who's a good friend of mine. And our whole job is to break what companies were buying, other companies. And it was a really exciting job. You'd get these giant tips, $100 billion deals, and you put the headlines down. You'd see the stock prices just go through the roof. Right. It was like this kind of adrenaline rush of a beat. So I did that for six years, which is a very long time to cover that beat because it's fairly all on. You know, you work every Sunday because deals get announced on Monday. But also a through line on that beat was the beginning of that Beat. When I started in 2013, the retail companies, the consumer companies, were worried about Amazon. By the time I left that beat in 20, every single corporate boardroom, I spoke to, every CEO, every banker in industrials, health care, every industry was worried about Amazon.
Dana Mattioli
And just to wrap up the M and A, you win another loeb award in 2016 covering the Dow DuPont merger. That was a giant merger. Tell us a little bit about that story.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, that was, you know, this was a time when there were a lot of. There was a lot of industrial M and A. A lot of these corporate giants that, you know, had been esteemed companies were hitting a rough patch. And we see a lot of deals in the chemicals space and the industrial space. I broke that with my colleagues Dana Semluca and Dave Benoit. And that was one of the biggest years for M and A that I was on the beat.
Dana Mattioli
So retail M and A. How do you end up not just back in the online retail space with Amazon, but making that your sole beat? How did you become Amazon? Only as a reporter.
Barry Ritholtz
So after six years on the M and A beat, you know, writing probably hundreds of articles, it's very competitive beat compete with Bloomberg pretty fiercely. It was time for me to take a step back from that type of reporting. You get fairly broken.
Dana Mattioli
It's a grind.
Barry Ritholtz
It is. It's a grind. You know, I was reporting stories out from my friends, weddings from christenings, from family birthday parties. You're never off. So I wanted to take a step back and do a bigger, like, investigatory beat. And the only thing that really excited me at the time was Amazon. I'd seen them be this major player on the retail beat, on the M and A beat. I saw stupid M and A happening because of Amazon. I remember I broke this deal when CVS was buying Aetna. This is a bet, the farm sort of M and a deal, $69 billion, where CVS, this pharmacy, was buying an insurance company. And I learned that the CEO of CVS was terrified of Amazon. Every board meeting he had with his board, they had Amazon proofing plans put in place. And I started seeing that in other boardrooms too, that these dumb deals were happening because people were trying to Amazon proof their business. Started to think about how little people knew about how Amazon always seemed to win, how they seemed to have their finger on the scale in a lot of ways. So I pitched this investigatory Amazon beat to my bosses at the Wall Street Journal. And they were into it. They said, if you think you could get inside this black box, then do It.
Dana Mattioli
What year was that?
Barry Ritholtz
That was 2019.
Dana Mattioli
All right, so by then I'm trying to remember how big Amazon had become. I mean, they obviously blew up after the pandemic. But I want to say Scott Galloway's book had already come out. Brad Stone's book, the Everything Store. I don't know if that had come out yet.
Barry Ritholtz
That did. That came out, I want to say maybe 2015.
Dana Mattioli
And both of those books sold very well and drew a lot of attention. Amazon, it doesn't sound like it was a tough argument to get the editors of the Wall Street Journal to say, hey, these guys are a behemoth. We need a dedicated person covering just this one company.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah. And they were excited that I raised my hand. I had a, you know, a history of being very scoopy, getting inside companies, award winning. And Amazon's such a big company, they're $2 trillion today and they're kind of like a giant. Not kind of, they're giant conglomerate. They're like 15 different publicly traded companies in one company. So I wanted to do this in a way that I picked my spots. If you just cover Amazon news day in, day out, you could just write wire stories all day. There's a million stories about them. I wanted to be deliberate and investigate them.
Dana Mattioli
So let's talk a little bit about that deliberate investigation. The book covers Amazon's quest to own the world and remake corporate power. What does that mean?
Barry Ritholtz
Well, Amazon, they started as this against all odds grudge startup, but what we've seen in more recent years is that they've become the number one or two player by size in about eight different industries. From retail, which we already know, 40% of everything bought online in the US is Amazon, to cloud computer, where they are the biggest cloud computing company in the world by far. Exactly. In the U.S. they deliver more parcels than UPS or FedEx. And it goes on and on and on.
Dana Mattioli
Say that again. They deliver more parcels than UPS or FedEx.
Barry Ritholtz
Yes. They are the number one parcel.
Dana Mattioli
That's astonishing.
Barry Ritholtz
And guess what? They're only their own product. They're not even delivering it really for other people. That's just Amazon goods.
Dana Mattioli
Wow.
Barry Ritholtz
They've taken over industry after industry and that's forced bankruptcies, it's forced lack of innovation. And beyond that, you know, my book gets into how they have this pattern of lying, cheating, copying their way to the top and using their leverage in all these different industries to crush competition.
Dana Mattioli
Oh, we're going to get into the details of that for sure. I just want to go through the Eight areas where they're number one or two. So online retail, cloud computing, data package delivery. What are. What are the other four or five where they're dominant?
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah. Voice assistant devices.
Dana Mattioli
Yeah.
Barry Ritholtz
Nobody comes close to that in online advertising. They're number three. Actually, I have a whole chart of.
Dana Mattioli
This, which, by the way, the online advertising has become so ubiquitous throughout the site. So it's Google, Facebook, Amazon.
Barry Ritholtz
Exactly.
Dana Mattioli
Amazing. Give us the other two or three ebooks. Ebooks. And that's before we get to other gadgets. Yeah, I mean, the Kindle. Does Barnes and Noble still make the Nook, or is that true?
Barry Ritholtz
They do, and it's kind of a paltry experience. And I'll tell you, 90% of my ebooks for this book have been sold on Amazon, which just tells you how much of a dominant.
Dana Mattioli
I'll tell you something fascinating, that when you Google search your book, the first link that comes up is Amazon. And that's true on Amazon. So much stuff. I mean, on Google. I don't mean on the Amazon site.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah.
Dana Mattioli
But on eight verticals, most of which they are either number one or number two.
Barry Ritholtz
And they're. And they're keeping. You know, they're gonna keep growing. They. They're getting into space with this project Kuiper. They are.
Dana Mattioli
Now, that's separate from Bezos's Blue Origins company. You're talking about a wholly different pursuit coming from Amazon proper, within their own company. And what do they want to do in space?
Barry Ritholtz
They're gonna go head to head with Elon Musk's Starlink with these satellites, these orbital satellites, and that should launch in the next year. So they're ever growing, and they have a lot of bandwidth to do that in ways that other publicly traded companies really don't.
Dana Mattioli
Why on earth does Amazon want to be in the satellite business? Out of curiosity, is this related at all to Blue Origins and what Bezos?
Barry Ritholtz
Well, it's a question for Bezos. I would say Starlink, which is Elon Musk's venture, is considered one of his crown jewels. So there's definitely an appeal there. The way that Elon has it structured, it does fit into his space exploration company, SpaceX. So some people posit that, should this be part of Blue Origin rather than Amazon?
Dana Mattioli
Sure.
Barry Ritholtz
But as of right now, it is part of Amazon.
Dana Mattioli
I guess the thinking must be, hey, if we have more people with access to the Internet, more shopping, more people will shop online and we'll capture 40% of it or whatever their market shares.
Barry Ritholtz
They'Ll boost those 200 million prime subscribers could grow exponentially.
Dana Mattioli
Right. How do you define Amazon prime as a vertical? Is it just part of their delivery process? It comes with a lot of other things. Where do you put Amazon prime into this?
Barry Ritholtz
I mean, it's one of the biggest membership programs there is at any company.
Dana Mattioli
It's amazing, right?
Barry Ritholtz
People pay for the privilege to shop with this company.
Dana Mattioli
Well, you theoretically pay for two day delivery. Although if you've been an Amazon user for any length of time, that turns out to be BS because they do everything they can to dissuade you from next day or two day or same day delivery. Hey, ship on Wednesdays with even fewer boxes. Create less ecological waste. Ship next Thursday. Here's a 99% digital coupon. Ooh, that's great. I'll save 99 cents. But obviously it works because the more they can spread out their shipping. My experience has been the shipping timeliness has decreased dramatically.
Barry Ritholtz
I hear that from a lot of shoppers.
Dana Mattioli
Right? I mean, so I've been an Amazon member since I got a gift certificate from my college roommate. I want to say it was 98. Wow, 98. So this early member. And I had a college long before that, but, but early member, like I used to just search and click whatever comment came up first and it was always the right thing. I ordered lithium batteries with a, like for a key fob on your car. It's a very specific model number. Wouldn't that exact model number come up first? So I was, and I went back and I redid it and figured out, oh, that's a sponsored link. That has nothing to do with what I requested other than it's roughly a lithium ion battery. So I went to return it and every now and then Amazon will say, yeah, don't bother, just, just keep it right and we'll credit you because it's more expensive to send it back than the product is worth. So the search has been terrible. The pages are just festooned with advertising. The whole experience is much worse. And then there's the other two issues. The prices are no longer the lowest. And the interesting thing about the pandemic is when they were frequently out of things, it sent you searching. So I think everybody has a target account, a Walmart account, which may not have been true in 2019 pre pandemic. So the whole experience is much less delightful than it was. I kind of think since Bezos left, the people who are there are just focused on how do we max out profitability and the hell with the user experience. Which wasn't what it felt like under Bezos, or am I wildly overstating that?
Barry Ritholtz
Well, there's a large part of my book gets into this toxic culture at Amazon where employees are in this Hunger Games like scenario where they're competing with their other employees to keep their jobs because 6%.
Dana Mattioli
We're talking about the 6%.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, they get cut at the end.
Dana Mattioli
Of the year plus forced ranking. That whole like everything they said they weren't doing, they actually were doing.
Barry Ritholtz
Every time I have all the documents right.
Dana Mattioli
GE used to cut the bottom 10%. Amazon is only 6%. And then where did the force ranking come from?
Barry Ritholtz
Jeff liked that intel did this. That's what he said to his leadership team. Like, let's do this because we have to get rid of the bottom performers. But that has unintended consequences. It means that everyone at Amazon on the white collar side is driven to work in a way that just benefits their numbers, benefits their bottom lines. Even if it's not good for you as the customer, Even if it means it's unsafe for the customer, as long as it's expanding selection and increasing profits. That often is the name of the game.
Dana Mattioli
Unsafe for the customer. How is it unsafe?
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah. So I have anecdotes in the book where there are well meaning people on the child marketplace team where they're selling clothes for children. And there's a mandate from Bezos to expand selection and get more sellers into Amazon.com because the more sellers sellers you have, the more sales you get. The more sales you get, the more sellers come on. Exactly. And they make changes to the signup process for sellers to onboard to Amazon.com, they want to make it easy as possible sign up and you could be selling within a day. Okay.
Dana Mattioli
Right.
Barry Ritholtz
So not really vetting these sellers.
Dana Mattioli
So in other words, Chinese junk with. That's not fireproof. That's not exactly.
Barry Ritholtz
So then the Chinese junk comes in within a day and some of these parents on the team are horrified. There are children's pajamas that smell like gas.
Dana Mattioli
Formaldehyde.
Barry Ritholtz
Right, Formaldehyde and gas. There are hoodies that have strings around the neck which are a strangulation hazard that are banned from being sold in the US because you could strangle a toddler.
Dana Mattioli
There are all these, Listen, if a few kids have to die in order for our profit margin to expand, that's just a little collateral damage. Who can complain as long as our profits are going up? I mean, you know, it's a tough world out there. Toughen up.
Barry Ritholtz
So they flag this to actually they take it upon themselves to add some of the friction back into the process to sign up. And their boss yells at them and says, take that off. And they say, well, we're trying to protect the consumer. Ostensibly we are a customer obsessed organization, which is what they say, right? And he said, well, if that's what Bezos wants, there's other people that will handle that. So they reluctantly do that and all the goods flood back in. And ironically, their boss, who told them not to do that, is now the VP of Customer safety and trust.
Dana Mattioli
That's amazing.
Barry Ritholtz
But my book found other examples. Amazon was selling carbon monoxide detectors that don't detect carbon monoxide.
Dana Mattioli
Well, you know, that's extra. If you want it to actually work, there's a fee. Yeah, that's a different. That's carbon monoxide Prime. You know, you can't just order early. You know, in the 2000s and 2010s, it felt like the reason people were terrified of Amazon is huge selection, fairly high quality product, and the prices were almost always the cheapest. I don't find any of those things now. The selection is sort of a. Paradoxically, there's so much garbage on it. Like when they first started Marketplace, my immediate reaction was, hey, if I wanted products from a garage sale, I know where ebay is. I can click over there. Why are you making this worse? But I guess, you know, it's worked out for him.
Barry Ritholtz
Well, there's a reason for that. You know, Amazon has been sued for being an illegal monopoly. And the idea here is that, you know, when a company is building monopoly, they have to have the best experience because they have to steal market share from their competitors. So when Amazon was coming up, when you liked the experience, it was fast shipping, the quality was much better, the prices were low because they were using predatory pricing to undercut their rivals to steal market share, get people to sign up for prime and put companies out of business. You know, when's the last time you saw Circuit City?
Dana Mattioli
Right? Circuit City, Linens and things, Toys R.
Barry Ritholtz
Us, it goes on.
Dana Mattioli
Go down the list.
Barry Ritholtz
And I spoke to all those CEOs for this book and they lived it firsthand. Amazon was undercutting them on price to steal their customers and put them out of business. What happens to a monopoly once they become a monopoly is that there's less competition now.
Dana Mattioli
You could raise prices.
Barry Ritholtz
Where are you going to go so they could raise prices? They could flood the feed with advertisements that are annoying to you. They could do all these things to make it a lesser experience. But have you canceled Your prime account.
Dana Mattioli
I haven't cancelled my prime account but I will tell you that I have dramatically reduced the products I buy on Amazon and very often in the old days it's like oh it's on Amazon. Remember one click buying. Yes, there is no more one click buying. Because when you see something, especially if it's something you're not familiar with the price, you have to quickly Google Walmart, Target and Google Shopping to see because every now and then a third party seller will have a product that's double or you know, 50% more than what it should be. I just bought something from Target the other day that was $22, it was $34 on Amazon and it wasn't being sold by Amazon but it was by a marketplace.
Barry Ritholtz
That's why also part of this building the monopoly situation is that Amazon's third party sellers, 60% of what's sold on Amazon is these third party sellers. They are so reliant on Amazon because 40% of everything sold online is there. They have to be there. And it's this weird love hate relationship.
Dana Mattioli
We're going to go into the details on some of the really dubious things they raises just across the board we'll talk about. I mean the book is kind of horrifying as you, I don't know if that was your intention but as you're walking through it it's like oh, this company has some ethical compromises and some just culture that seems to be really toxic not just for the customers but the employees as well and the partners. It seems across the board it's win at all costs and you don't often stop and think what that means. But it means a lot of really bad things according to your book.
Barry Ritholtz
It does.
Hannah Fry
They say that the fifth Industrial revolution is about human centricity, about building technology to enhance our abilities and productivity. But previous revolutions haven't exactly been kind to ordinary workers. Can this one really be any different? Can we build a more utopian view of the future while respecting the forces of industry? I'm Hannah Frey, host of the Exponential Era and I got to sit down with an expert at Nokia Bell Lab to ask these questions. Find out their answers@bloomberg.com Nokia from the.
Ms. Klein
Delta Sky Club welcome back Ms. Klein to the JetBridge. Delta Air Lines relies on 5G solutions from T Mobile for business to power operations and serve customers faster. Together we're putting 5G into the hands of ground staff so they can better assist on the go travelers with real time information throughout the airport. This, this is elevating Customer experience. This is Delta Air Lines with T Mobile for Business. Take your business further@t mobile.com now let's.
Dana Mattioli
Talk a little bit about how Amazon's culture got to where it is today, going back to its origin story. Bezos works at hedge fund quantshop De Shaw, and he is given the task, along with three other employees of investigating this newfangled Internet thingy and what the possible areas for growth and disruption might come out of it. Three or four different analysts were given different sections. Bezos was tasked with looking into the impact of the Internet on retail directly by David Shaw. Tell us a little bit about that project. How long on D.E. shaw's dime was Bezos researching the Internet?
Barry Ritholtz
Months. And he liked what he saw at the time. The idea that this would take off was really far fetched. 3%.
Dana Mattioli
93, 94, something like that.
Barry Ritholtz
It was 93. And 3% of Americans had ever been on the World Wide Web. So think of it. And David Shaw was the nerdy programmer type of person who could see the potential for it. So he thinks, have my Star Associates and VPs look into the commercial uses for the Internet. One looks into banking and Jeff looks into retail. The idea is if they think it's worthwhile, that D.E. shaw will open up these verticals and they do it with the other areas. The people that research the other areas for David, start businesses for him that make money.
Dana Mattioli
Why didn't David Shaw invest in Bezos and Amazon when he left for Seattle then?
Barry Ritholtz
Bezos likes what he sees, all on De Shaw's dime. He does his research report, sees that there's legs for this, thinks that books could be the first area of selling online. And he goes on this walk with David in Central park and says, hey, I think I'm going to quit and start an online bookshop. And David said, I think that's, you already have a really good job. I think that's a good idea for someone else. And by the way, that was my idea. We might go head to head with you and compete with you on this and. And Bezos basically says, I'll take the risk and moves out to Seattle.
Dana Mattioli
Kind of surprised that Shaw went that way. Instead of saying sort of let us seed you, let us participate in this. Like it was a little adversarial as opposed to cooperative.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah. And actually Bezos had a really hard time fundraising this idea because it was so wild. You know, it took him a really long time to get his first million dollars. Most of his investments trickled in in.
Dana Mattioli
$50,000 increments literally friends and family.
Barry Ritholtz
Oh yeah, big time.
Dana Mattioli
Until eventually. Who was the first VC to put money into?
Barry Ritholtz
I believe it was Kleiner.
Dana Mattioli
Kleiner Perks.
Barry Ritholtz
They were on the board.
Dana Mattioli
Oh, that's right. John Doarr was on the board for forever. That's okay. So really kind of interesting that he missed it. But the whole thing, just the way I learned about it, it's kind of shady, isn't it?
Barry Ritholtz
I mean, it's copycat mentality that continues to this day at Amazon. Oh, that's a good idea. Be ashamed if someone took it.
Dana Mattioli
So Amazon is not only customer obsessed, as Bezos once said, but it's also competitor obsessed. Where does that come from and how does it manifest itself?
Barry Ritholtz
Oh, they're the most competitor obsessed company I've ever covered. And I've covered companies for 18 years. Part of it is the culture because they have to be performing at all times to justify their existence to not get cut. It's the pressure cooker of an environment that people that I've spoken to that might have worked at other companies wouldn't be tempted to do illegal things, unethical things, anti competitive things, are sort of forced to their breaking point at Amazon. And I could give you an example if you like. There's a scene in the book that has resonated with a lot of people where Amazon, at Jeff's behest, wanted to create like a Trader Joe's like product line of food. He liked that Trader Joe's was quirky and cool. So the, the team at Amazon writes this six pager. That's how they come up with ideas. And it says, we want to copy the top 200 best selling items at Trader Joe's. And they get the green light from management to do that. But Trader Joe's is a really secretive company. They don't do online shopping. It's hard to figure out what the best sellers are.
Dana Mattioli
Literally got to walk through the store and see what you do.
Barry Ritholtz
You have to walk through the store and people love to do it. It's like a really delightful experience. Right. So the head of the team goes about hiring the senior executive from Trader Joe's. She doesn't really know what her job's gonna be, moves out to Seattle and her first week in Seattle stumbles across this really secretive room, conference room. It has paper over the doors and the walls, brown paper so you can't see inside. And she goes inside and it's filled with Trader Joe's boxes of foods. And she has this light bulb moment like, oh, Crap. I've been hired to replicate my former employer. From there, her boss starts hounding her, saying, give me any documents you retained from your time at Trader Joe's, which is clearly like.
Dana Mattioli
And the correct answer is, I have no documents. They made me turn everything in as per my prior employment agreement.
Barry Ritholtz
Or if I do, I cannot give them over to you because that's actually illegal. Okay? So she says no. The boss keeps hounding her, hounding her. And, like, it becomes this really tense experience. Then she emails him the top selling items from Trader Joe's from one whole week in the U.S. ranked by product, you know, that were sold. And they start to disseminate that within the team. They have their blueprint to copy the top 200 items at Trader Joe's. And then he doesn't stop there. He says, now send me all the margins.
Dana Mattioli
Really?
Barry Ritholtz
And she says, no, I'm not doing that. And he screams at her in the middle of the Seattle office. She starts crying. And someone reports to HR because it was just, like, such a clear violation. And Amazon actually fired those people because it went up to hr. But that sort of scenario plays out at Amazon. Every single team.
Dana Mattioli
I want to stay with the idea of some of the earlier advantages that Amazon had and how it. How it resulted in their growth. We'll get to diapers.com, we'll get to some of the other competitors. Let's talk about the state tax advantage. So talk about arbitrage. Bezos specifically picks Washington state because there's so few shoppers in the state that by locating there and shipping to the rest of the country, he doesn't believe he has to collect state sales tax because of an old Supreme Court case. Maybe it involved a catalog. It wasn't Sears was.
Barry Ritholtz
It was a catalog.
Dana Mattioli
It wasn't Sears that said, hey, you only collect. Interstate commerce is not taxable, therefore, you don't have to collect it. It's only unless you have a nexus to that state. So immediately they're at a 6, 7, 8% advantage over everybody else in most states. Tell us how they pushed the envelope with state sales tax.
Barry Ritholtz
Oh, this was simultaneously brilliant but horrifying for the rest of retail. He comes up with this idea that his warehouses don't count as physical locations.
Dana Mattioli
For Amazon, which is kind of bizarre because of course it is, right? I mean, if you locate a warehouse in New York, you now have a nexus with New York.
Barry Ritholtz
But they tried to carve that out as a separate entity. And up until 2017, Amazon was not collecting sales tax in Some states.
Dana Mattioli
So they had a 20 year head start.
Barry Ritholtz
Exactly. And up to 10% in some of these states. And that just had ripple effects because people, once the advent of online shopping came about, people became really price conscious. You know, people would do comparison shopping. And I spoke to one of the presidents of Sears who had to deal with this head on, and he said, you know, Amazon and him would be selling the same Sony television. Let's say it's $500 market the price Amazon for many states could sell that for $500 flat. Sears would have to charge 8% sales tax in New York. So what would Sears do? They would cut the price of their TV by 8% in order to go head to head with Amazon and they would just completely destroy their margins. And it created this race to the bottom on electronics prices because they had to try to compete, but at a loss. This happened in so many companies where they either couldn't compete and they lost the sale to Amazon, or they cut their prices and they destroyed their margins. And that's like a very easy way to go bankrupt.
Dana Mattioli
So with the benefit of hindsight, you look at, they have this advantage for 20 years, which is a long time. I'm kind of shocked that states didn't stand up and say, not only are we losing jobs in our states, but we're losing tens of millions or hundreds of millions in tax revenue. Why did the various states tolerate this for as long as they did?
Barry Ritholtz
That's a really good question. I spoke to someone in Amazon's public policy office that worked on this and he said, like, this was our secret sauce. And Amazon fought tooth and nail to preserve it, to not get rid of this advantage they had. And so they, you know, they'd go to court, they would go before Congress and make their case. And some states did come knocking.
Dana Mattioli
Wherever there isn't a state income tax, there's usually a state sales tax, right? So if you open a warehouse there and the state is losing a lot of revenue, why wouldn't they just sue Amazon and say, hey, we figured out you sold this many goods in our state and you owe sales tax here because you have a nexus.
Barry Ritholtz
Well, part of what I found is that many of these legislators in the states were very shortsighted. They wanted to put out press releases that, oh, we got an Amazon warehouse with all of these temporary jobs. And there's this horrible scene in the book where Jerry Storch, who's the CEO of Toys R Us at the time, which is one of New Jersey's largest.
Dana Mattioli
Employers, okay, speaks to Chris Christie, he.
Barry Ritholtz
Speaks to Chris Christie. He says, you guys are killing me. Why are you not making Amazon collect sales tax in New Jersey? You're putting Toys R Us out of business. You're gonna put Main street out of business. And Chris Christie sort of, yeah, yeah, yeahs him. And then a year later they announced this big Amazon warehouse in Robbinsville, New Jersey. They give Amazon all these tax credits for it, and Chris Christie gets to put out the press release that they're bringing hundreds of jobs to New Jersey. But Jerry's whole point was, okay, you're getting hundreds of jobs there, you're gonna lose thousands of jobs just from my one company. So that's really short sighted. And that's what happened. You know, Toys R Us went out of business.
Dana Mattioli
It's amazing how effective they were manipulating so many self interested politicians who are so shortsighted. But we saw that time and time again. It was fascinating that the Amazon 2 HQ was slated for New York. And a lot of people in New York said, this is a money losing deal. This isn't a wealthy company. Why do we have to give them tax breaks? They have to compete with everybody else. And they said, screw you, we're going to dc.
Barry Ritholtz
And New York was one of the rare cities to really call them out on that. Just think about the frenzy around hundreds of different cities lobbied and put in these very intensive applications for the pleasure of having these warehouse jobs and the second headquarters there. And that just shows how politicians really just want the jobs.
Dana Mattioli
Right? That's right. And so it was kind of interesting that when you ran the numbers as people in New York did, it wasn't a good deal. And they ended up sort of splitting it. It's kind of part in Virginia. And where, where did the rest of the Amazon headquarters end up going?
Barry Ritholtz
Oh, it's, it's in Virginia, but they haven't broken ground on a lot of it.
Dana Mattioli
Oh really?
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah.
Dana Mattioli
So that, that was years ago. I mean, after all those crazy contests and RFPs and submissions, I got like 200 cities applying for this. They still haven't broken ground. That's amazing.
Barry Ritholtz
They have one building up for sure, but the whole plan has not come to fruition.
Dana Mattioli
Ironically, if you take the Long Island Expressway out past Jericho Syosset, you'll see this immense warehouse that they built that used to just be like an empty parking lot. I don't know what was there. If for years it was rumored that something was coming. And what a perfect location right off the highway. Why do you need to give you Know, that gives them access to 40 million people or 50 million people on the island. Why would you have to give them a tax break for that? That's where the customers are. Shouldn't their business model be able to accommodate building a warehouse?
Barry Ritholtz
I mean, they have something like $6.5 billion in subsidies on taxes from different jurisdictions around the U.S. it's pretty staggering.
Dana Mattioli
Yeah, that's really amazing. The other thing that was so disruptive was how Amazon changed how Wall street itself viewed retailers, both in terms of profit versus growth and startups versus established retailers. Talk a little bit about the impact Amazon had on how Wall street thought about other companies.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, this was huge. There probably wouldn't be an Amazon today if Jeff not that did not convince Wall street that we don't have to make profits. Right.
Dana Mattioli
His initial shareholder letter was, hey, don't expect profits for the next 10 or 20 years.
Barry Ritholtz
Exactly. And, and that just was not the norm back then. It is today. But that was definitely not the norm. And this just gave him a tremendous roadway to reinvest in his business and grow and steal share and cut on.
Dana Mattioli
Prices to get customers and not pay federal taxes. Because if you're not profitable, no tax.
Barry Ritholtz
That's a great point. Low tax rate. And that really destroyed his competitors because they couldn't catch up with him on online shopping. I spoke to a lot of these CEOs who went head to head with Amazon in the 1990s and 2000s. One of them was the CEO of Linens and Things. And I said, why were you all so late to online shopping? Did you not believe in it? And he said, dana, we believed in it. But my boardroom, my board of directors laughed me out of the room when I asked for $100 million to get our E commerce and logistics up and running. Because that would have tanked our earnings, that would have tanked our share price.
Dana Mattioli
There's a little bit of short termism there because. And again, we have the benefit of hindsight, but he obviously saw what was coming. Why can't you say to the board, look, here's the trade off. Either we spend $100 million now and be able to compete with them, or we and lose some stock price for a couple of quarters or years or we're dead. Those are your choices. You want a little bit of a pullback now or you just want to go bankrupt because there's nothing in between.
Barry Ritholtz
Retail is a notoriously hard business. It could be low margin and they have to manage to Wall street quarter after quarter, quarter to quarter and they couldn't. The CEO told me we couldn't miss one quarter of earnings, let alone years of them like Bezos did. I'd be out of a job. I would be fired. The company could go bankrupt. And that was exactly what was going on in every company that was trying to compete with them to the point where so many of them had to outsource their logistics to Amazon, which was their main competitor list.
Dana Mattioli
Toys R Us, Linens and things, Target. Why on earth would Target, which is a giant company, outsource its E Commerce to Amazon?
Barry Ritholtz
Well, Jerry Storch, who was the CEO of Toys R Us, first worked@target on.com and he told me a story that he got yelled at by senior leaders for spending $10,000 on buying the domain name targetstores.com.
Dana Mattioli
That'S an amazing story in the book, which is like $10,000 for a domain like that is a rounding out.
Barry Ritholtz
They have to be so careful with their money because it's a hard business. Right? And so, yeah, Target, Borders, Toys R Us, R Us. And they, they had to outsource it. So which meant Amazon kept their customer data. They paid Amazon a fee for shipping it, they paid Amazon a fee for listing it. They paid Amazon all these fees and Amazon had all the upside.
Dana Mattioli
And they figured out, you write in the book, they figured out that if they were losing 65, $70 million a year on their site, hey, we could charge them 50 million and it's a cost saving for them.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, they just came up with an arbitrary number below that threshold.
Dana Mattioli
Just, just astonishing. So let's stay with books for a minute. I'm fascinated that Barnes and Noble tries to respond very aggressively to Amazon. And they figure we're gonna take over wholesaler Ingram in order to get a little more bulk, be able to withstand Amazon, which at that point had become a substantial market share of the book selling world. And Amazon gets the takeover stopped on antitrust grounds. How ironic. Explain what happened there.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah. So Barnes and Noble, in order to stay competitive, tries to buy Ingram, this book distributor that Amazon also used. And Amazon cried foul and said this should be an antitrust violation. And basically Amazon even today sometimes has this mentality that they are the David going up against Goliath. Even though that has not been true for a very, very long time, including in that anecdote. Amazon by market value was way bigger than Bart. Barnes and Noble at that time. And Len Riggio, the CEO of Barnes & Noble at the time, calls them out on it. He says, you're crying foul and pretending like this is going to hurt this little player. But you are the behemoth here. You know the regulators do turn it down.
Hannah Fry
They say that the fifth industrial revolution is about human centricity, about building technology to enhance our abilities and productivity. But previous revolutions haven't exactly been kind to ordinary workers workers. Can this one really be any different? Can we build a more utopian view of the future while respecting the forces of industry? I'm Hannah Fry, host of the Exponential Era and I got to sit down with an expert at Nokia Bell Labs to ask these questions. Find out their answers@bloomberg.com Nokia from the.
Ms. Klein
Delta Sky Club welcome back Ms. Klein to the JetBridge. Delta Air Lines relies on 5G solutions from T Mobile for business to power operations and serve customers faster. Together we're putting 5G into the hands of ground staff so they can better assist on the go travelers with real time information throughout the airport. This is elevating customer experience. This is Delta Air Lines with T Mobile for business. Take your business further@t mobile.com now.
Dana Mattioli
So we were talking earlier about Amazon's lack of of profitability for the first couple of years. It's kind of interesting how Bezos's initial shareholder letter, I want to say 96, something like that, 97 the same year as the IPO warned investors not to expect profits for years to come. We're going to spend a billion dollars building out our website. Not only did did this not have a negative impact, Wall street applauded the profitless growth. Tell us a little bit about what an advantage and how prescient that shareholder letter from Bezos was.
Barry Ritholtz
He trained his shareholders essentially to not expect anything and he was very clear communicating that. But it also just gave them roadway to take all their money and say books are not the be all end all. We're going to use this as a test case. We're going to make some money and then we're going to take all that money and put it into expanding our verticals. Let's open this up to toys. Let's open this up to electronics. It allowed them to build the everything store and then it allowed them to put this money toward other areas of growth beyond retail and really create this.
Dana Mattioli
Amazon octopus to say the very least. Let's talk about Amazon Web Services. I love the part of the book where you describe how this became a thing. Every time they would stand up a new vertical or open a new division and people forget what it was like in the 90s and early 2000s before there was an AWS, you had to go out and buy a couple hundred servers and a lot of software engineers to put this together and to manage it. And then you had to build like you were reinventing the wheel every time there was a new startup. Tell us about how Andy Jassy kind of looked at this and said, hey, why don't we just do this once and scale it for ourselves and maybe someone else will want to buy the excess from us.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah. So Andy Jassy, who's the CEO today, started at Amazon, like, a little bit before the ipo. So he's been there from the early days. Amazon's retail business was expanding so rapidly, and they had so much data and they needed so much computing power that they were continuously adding that to their own business. And they got good at it. Jeff and Andy and a few other people started figuring out like, hey, yeah, we're a retail company, but we're also good at this technology stuff if we need this. Other companies probably also need this as they explore expanding online. So they productized it. They created a company called Amazon Web Services. It was very iffy as to whether this would take off. They didn't dedicate a ton of resources to it at the beginning. Andy remembers sheepishly asking for, like, a few dozen employees to work on it with him and thought that was like a big deal standalone. If this were to be split off from, Amazon would be one of the biggest tech companies in the world on.
Dana Mattioli
Its own, and one of the biggest sources of profits for Amazon as well.
Barry Ritholtz
An enormous source of profits.
Dana Mattioli
So they start out with storage. They start out, they add computes. They had a number of different services that just allow anybody. You don't have to go buy a bunch of servers. And that really led to an enormous adoption cycle by a lot of tech startups. A lot of small companies that, hey, you don't need $100 million worth of junk. It's two guys on a laptop and you can launch a bit.
Barry Ritholtz
Exactly. And also a lot of their competitors, a lot of their fiercest competitors, Netflix, Apple, use aws. The CIA uses aws. Right. So this is a really entrenched business product for them. And it's very sticky. Once you're on it, you don't really leave.
Dana Mattioli
So it's kind of interesting what happens in other areas of Amazon where there's supposed to be a Chinese wall between you as a customer of their corporate services and the rest of their business. But you describe time and time again in the book how that Chinese wall really doesn't exist. Anybody has access to everything throughout the company. Let's talk a little bit about Marketplace. All right, so originally Amazon chased ebay, launched an auction site. It actually failed. And the pivot was to Marketplace, hey, let's bring in third party sellers of stuff rather than auctions, just selling it at standard prices. That's now more than half of the business.
Barry Ritholtz
It's more than 60% of the retail sales.
Dana Mattioli
That's amazing. So that becomes wildly successful. But all of these small businesses that sell in Marketplace, they haven't been very happy with how Marketplace works. Tell us what's going on.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, they have this uncomfortable situation of selling on Marketplace, relying on it for their income, then also seeing a lot of their products that they've gone to great lengths to use R and D to create, showing up in very similar versions on Amazon's private label side of the business called Amazon Basics or Amazon Essentials. And for years they've alleged that Amazon stole my idea. And Amazon has always very vocally refuted that notion. They say, you know, there's firewalls, we would never copy our own sellers. And they've, they've disputed that. And I was able to get documentation and find the receipts that they've been doing this for a very long time.
Dana Mattioli
So let's put a little flesh on that. So Amazon is both the platform to these third party sellers as well as a original competitor, not merely selling other people's products, but creating their own. Anything that's a hot seller on Amazon, they are aware of through their own data and they look at it, they look at the margin, they figure out how cheaply can we make this and how much do we want to go after this? They've been pretty aggressive about that, haven't they?
Barry Ritholtz
They have. I mean, the documents that I was given shows how they reverse engineer these best selling products and they have everything from the number of items sold to the cost to sell them, to the number of returns to the margins. There's 25 different fields that the employees on the private label side of the company who have been told, you probably shouldn't be doing this. There's policies in place at Amazon that are essentially not enforced. And because they're afraid of losing their jobs and not hitting their numbers, they've often resorted to looking over the fence and taking this type of data to reverse engineer best selling hits because it makes them look good and it keeps their jobs. And Amazon, even on, under oath told Congress that they were not doing this.
Dana Mattioli
Really? Yes, under oath. And yet it's pretty obvious they've Been doing this and doing it for a long time. Let's talk a little bit about Alexa and how they sent up a venture fund that was very different than the typical venture fund. Tell us a little bit about what's going on with Voice and Alexa inside of Amazon.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, Amazon was one of the pioneers of this voice technology and these voice assisted robots. And as such they set up this VC arm called the Alexa Fund. And what I learned was that a pattern played out. They'd have all of these CEOs and founders pitch them on getting money and seed investments for their companies. And under the auspices of either getting an investment or being bought by Amazon's M and A arm, they'd share all of their proprietary data things like their patents, their technologies, all the stuff that companies go to great lengths to keep secret because they think they're getting an investment. And time and time again, Amazon would take that information, bring the heads of different Amazon businesses to these meetings to learn from it, and then ghost them and introduce the same exact product from an Amazon brand.
Dana Mattioli
Months later, you talk about the firewalls and the VCs and one entrepreneur is in a meeting with a bunch of people, hey, who are those guys? I know you are. You know, who are, who are these guys? And it turns out they're the product heads that are going to be making the competing, competing product. It's really the, the. I like the VC quote. Amazon is a wolf in wolf's clothing. Like there's a very. Really not even a big attempt to hide it. A different part of the book describes an entrepreneur where there are people in the room with their arms closed, looking bored and like not usual venture capital behavior. If you're really interested in this technology, they eventually figure out this is just a fishing expedition.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, yeah, that was.
Dana Mattioli
Fishing is too kind. You call it specifically VC espionage. Yeah. Talk a little bit about how misleading even the NDAs were. The non disclosure.
Barry Ritholtz
Oh my God. This was galling to me as a deal geek who covered M and A. I asked some of these founders I spoke to for the book to send me all the documents that Amazon gave them prior to these meetings. And I read them very thoroughly and found something called a residuals clause buried in the legalese. And it basically said that anything retained in the memories of Amazon executives at these meetings where proprietary stuff is being disclosed could be used with by Amazon in their own business without any legal repercussions. So it's a license to steal.
Dana Mattioli
So. So essentially, and I keep coming back to this from the original D.E. shaw, issue the culture at Amazon. They hired senior lawyers from some of the best firms. It seems like ethics is completely irrelevant. It seems like this is a group of rogue capitalists who are just rapacious in their greed regardless of ethics and business standards. They're just operating in a gray zone of legality, but in a very black and white zone of ethics. These are bad people doing bad things.
Barry Ritholtz
The interesting thing is so many of my sources for this book are the people doing the bad things because once they take a step back from Amazon and they realize how this company pushed them to their breaking point, that it made them do things that they would not have done at a company that was not so cutthroat, they feel bad.
Dana Mattioli
They should. They have a guilty conscience because they did really bad things for the money. They could feel bad about it after the fact, but let's be blunt. They had big stock options and reasonable pay packages. And if you're coming over From a top 20 law firm where you're giving up a seven figure job, you're doing it because you have the chance to make 10 figures in your stock options. So I feel bad that they feel bad. Not really. They did bad things because they were in for the money and they realized the trade off wasn't worth it. Sell your soul for a few bucks, you still made a deal with the devil.
Barry Ritholtz
I would agree with you. And you know, that's the one thing I wanted to depict in this book is the human toll of that. I mean, when I was reporting out that chapter, you're just describing the founders that would cry to me on the phone about what happened to their companies, how Amazon just decimated them. It was really hard reporting. Just as a journalist, like internalized a lot of that. This company that. But didn't need to do these things to win, chose to.
Dana Mattioli
Right.
Barry Ritholtz
And it cost people their jobs, their livelihoods, their technologies. At what cost?
Dana Mattioli
Let's talk a little bit about diapers.com and what was the parent company? Quizzi Quidzy Quiz. So this is kind of interesting. Amazon can't figure out how to ship diapers quickly. Right? And moms are a giant demographic in retail. I think the book says they make 84% of the consumer spending. They control the decisions in the household. Like you win the moms, you win retail. And these guys have figured out how to have diapers arrive next day. Like they figured out how to reach moms and Amazon decides to go after them.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah.
Dana Mattioli
And they, they start predatory pricing, selling diapers 20% below cost. Which one would think is illegal, isn't that?
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, it's the definition of predatory pricing. It's 2010. Jeff Bezos becomes laser focused on Quidsi, which is started by these two entrepreneurs that are like the first people in their families to even go to college. Right. These are homegrown talent, Mark Lore and Vineet Bharara. Right. And he puts together a team to essentially spy on them and figure out how they do it. And Amazon starts to really cut the prices of their own diapers 30%. They cut the price of their diapers so much that they start losing $200 million a month just on diapers. According to internal documents, that's.
Dana Mattioli
That's 2.2 billion a year on diapers.
Barry Ritholtz
Alone because they were so threatened by this little startup in New Jersey. Okay, Right. And Amazon eventually makes a buyout offer to this firm, but they don't want to do it because they're doing so well, they think they could IPO one day, so they turn them down. So then Amazon ratchets up the heat, cuts price of diapers more, creates this loyalty program to incentivize moms to shop with Amazon, not quidsi. And it becomes the point where it's untenable for the Quidsie people. They start missing their internal numbers. They have to start considering a sale. Unfortunately, they're really crestfallen about that. Amazon's one of the biggest players in the space. They even have to consider an offer from the person that did this to them. Okay. So they're at this private dinner with Amazon executives discussing this offer. They don't want to sell to Amazon. And Marc Lawre's BlackBerry at the time gets an email pop up and it's an offer from Walmart. And they're excited for like $100 million.
Dana Mattioli
More than the 5 and change.
Barry Ritholtz
Exactly.
Dana Mattioli
550Amazon had offered.
Barry Ritholtz
It's a higher offer, and it's not the company that's destroyed them. So they go in the hallway, they discuss it, and they say, let's take this Walmart offer. They go back into the room with the Amazon executives, they say, hey, just want to let you know, we got this offer. It's better for our shareholders. We're going to go in this direction. And they're told by a senior Amazon executive, okay, you go ahead and do that, and we're going to cut the price of our diapers to zero.
Dana Mattioli
That seems legal, right? We're gonna give our diapers away to put you out of business and prevent you from selling to our competitor, Walmart Right.
Barry Ritholtz
And the people in that room knew that if Walmart had decided to acquire quidsi and Amazon put them out of, you know, created this pricing war that they were selling diapers for either zero or like a dollar material change. Exactly.
Dana Mattioli
In fact elements that would lead to the deal falling apart.
Barry Ritholtz
Walmart could back away from the deal scot free. So they were forced to sell to their main competitor who put them in this position. And this created, you know, generational wealth for those two men who didn't even go to for a drink to celebrate because they were so upset.
Dana Mattioli
Now what, what did they end up doing in the future post that that purchase?
Barry Ritholtz
Oh, they shut it down. They shut down Quincy.
Dana Mattioli
They just took all the clients. They took the.
Barry Ritholtz
It ran for a few years and.
Dana Mattioli
Then eventually was folded in. The two guys who created Quidsi, did they do anything else in the future?
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, Mark Lori went on to, to start a company called Jet.com he sold.
Dana Mattioli
His which gets boy Walmart buys it.
Barry Ritholtz
For a very significant sum, couple of billion bucks. He now owns. If you live in New York, there's a place called Wonder, this restaurant company that's his. I actually really like Wonder. So he's doing that now. So I mean he's gone on to do really big things.
Dana Mattioli
So the fascinating thing is after being forced to sell the Diapers.com company to Amazon, Jet.com became essentially the back end of all of Walmart online retailing. So I want to say he got a little bit of payback. Whether, whether or not he, you know, put as much pain to Amazon as Amazon put to him is, is arguable. But it was pretty obvious and you make it clear in the book he was imagine getting bought for $550 million and leaving dejected. I know, it's kind of amazing.
Barry Ritholtz
It is, it really is. I mean I just, I think it speaks to like the pain and suffering they went through with this M and A battle.
Dana Mattioli
One of the things that kind of shocked me, you mentioned what a difficult place to work Amazon is. They even backload their stock options, your stock options. Like if you work at Google or somewhere else, you get stock options and they'll vest in three years and you could start selling. At least that's what it used to be. I don't know what it is these days, but they backloaded. It's 5, 15. Year three is 40% of your stock options. Year four is 40%. You really have to stick it out, don't you?
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah. And that creates this pernicious cycle. The Average white collar employee at Amazon lasts a year and a half. Because of the culture, most of them leave their stock options on the table. But if you want to get your full payout, you have to survive. You have to not be part of that bottom 6% that creates that pressure cooker of an environment that I talk about.
Dana Mattioli
So let's ask the question about the big question. Is Amazon a monopoly? Have they remade corporate power in their own image? And what sort of antitrust enforcement might we expect in the future?
Barry Ritholtz
Well, governments around the world, including our government, have said it is a monopoly. The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit last year saying it's an illegal monopoly. And the lawsuit says it could be broken up.
Dana Mattioli
What about Europe? They've been pretty strict about Amazon as well.
Barry Ritholtz
The EU was way ahead of us on policing our own giants. Marguerite Vestaire was looking into Amazon, Facebook, Google and Apple years ago, and people thought she was crazy.
Dana Mattioli
Right? So we're recording this a week before the election. We don't know what the outcome is gonna be, but it appears that no matter who wins, Amazon's gonna stay in the FTC's crosshairs because Lina Khan works for the Biden Harris administration. The assumption is if Harris wins, she continues. And Trump really dislikes Bezos because of his ownership of the Washington Post and has said Amazon should be broken up. What's it like inside the lobbying arm of Amazon heading into this election?
Barry Ritholtz
You know, it's really fascinating. I don't know which administration they would want to win. They had a really painful four years under Trump where he was just berating them online every day, alleging that Jeff Bezos was using the Washington Post as a political tool to attack him.
Dana Mattioli
The Amazon, Washington Post.
Barry Ritholtz
Amazon, Washington Post. That should be a lobbyist, according to him. So that was like super painful. But then the Biden administration came in where they had good connections, and that was even more painful in some ways. Biden chooses Lina Khan to be the head of the ftc. She brings forward the lawsuit against Amazon for being a monopoly. So either way, it's not like a really great outcome for that company.
Dana Mattioli
You know, the interesting thing about the antitrust enforcement against Microsoft in the 90s was just having that enforcement hanging over their head was enough to allow all these small companies to get out from under. You know, every startup had to deal with the question. Every software startup, hey, what's going to prevent Microsoft from just building these features into Office or into Windows? And it was really challenging. The antitrust enforcement seemed to have forced them to behave better and that was the Cambrian explosion of dotcoms. Might we see something similar with Amazon? Might online retail expand from the 40% market share Amazon has elsewhere? If this antitrust work is enforced, the.
Barry Ritholtz
Big question is, will this FTC suit have a chilling effect on the way Amazon behaves? I would say they have more competition these days. Temu and Shein are these low cost Chinese marketplaces. But I don't see any changes to the way Amazon is operating. Andy Jassy, there's a scoop in the book. He's telling his deputies around the same time that they have this historic lawsuit against them for being too big, that they should be so much bigger. He tells them we should be a $10 trillion company. Okay, so how do you get to $10 trillion when you're $2 trillion? It's competing the way you've been competing, supersizing it.
Dana Mattioli
And since we're talking about antitrust enforcement, it's kind of fascinating that the entire we've had 40 years of lax antitrust enforcement dating back to the Reagan administration. And Judge Bork, who was one of the biggest advocates of moving away from historical antitrust enforcement you describe in the book. Lina Khan is a 27 year old law student at Yale. She writes a law review paper on how much Amazon is a monopoly. And when was the last time a law review paper went viral like this? This completely upended what was going on. Tell us a little bit about Lina Khan.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, she was this law school student at Yale where actually Bork had been a professor. And she writes this seminal law review article saying that the antitrust laws, the way that they're being interpreted partially because of Bork, are failing customers and consumers in the US and that Amazon's the prime example of this, that Amazon is a monopoly and it's allowed to be a monopoly because we're not enforcing our antitrust laws the way that they were first derived. And this might be the only time that a law review article goes viral. Millions of people read this thing, including legislators, CEOs. It gets picked up by the New York Times. Right. It becomes this like zeitgeist type of movement. It's the first time that people start equating this company with the smile on the box with potentially being a monopoly. And she starts to, with this other band of trust busters, start to reshape this moment in time about whether antitrust laws are failing Americans.
Dana Mattioli
She makes the point that the way Amazon has become a monopoly and abuses its platform power is very reminiscent of what we saw under Standard Oil and Rockefeller, tell us a little bit about some of the abusive uses of their power that manifest in their growth.
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah. So she points to predatory pricing, that Amazon was undercutting the market in those early days in order to steal share from rivals and put them out of business. She also says they're like a utility, that this isn't a company that you might want to work with. You sort of have to work with them if you want to reach shoppers. And that has power over the sellers on their website where they could jack up fees. It has power over lots of different competitors that feel like they're forced to work with their main rival in order to access markets, share a lot of.
Dana Mattioli
Data, share a lot of information. They would rather not share a lot as well as buy advertising from them.
Barry Ritholtz
Advertising is another area in the book.
Dana Mattioli
You talk about how when Amazon enters into the marketplace with a competitive product, they shut off their competitors ability to advertise that product.
Barry Ritholtz
They do. Advertising has become so core to being successful as a seller on Amazon.com, because there's millions of other sellers that flywheel that if you don't buy advertising, you're not showing up in search. What did Amazon do? Roku, which makes a competing device for them for streaming tv, all of a sudden they can't buy ads anymore. This happened across the devices space.
Dana Mattioli
And so the antitrust law is, hey, if you want to be a platform, you can be a platform. If you want to be a retailer, you could be a retailer, but you can't tie your platform advertising into reducing the competitiveness of your products versus other people.
Barry Ritholtz
Well, that's what the Congress was alleging. That if you can't own the world's biggest online platform and also compete on it, that it has to be one or the other.
Dana Mattioli
Spin out that separate business and do that.
Barry Ritholtz
FTC lawsuit's a little bit different. She alleges that actually in this current forum, Amazon's become the monopoly. They don't have to do predatory pricing anymore. They could actually exert their power on their sellers. You know, a decade ago the average seller on Amazon gave 19 cents on the dollar back to Amazon in fees. Today that's 45 cents on the dollar.
Dana Mattioli
That's unbelievable.
Barry Ritholtz
And that means those sellers have had to raise the price of their goods to cover Amazon's margin or reduce their own margin or reduce their own margin. And the FTC lawsuit says because Amazon's so big and they require those sellers to also have the lowest price on Amazon, that they have to raised the price on Target.com and Walmart.com and on and on and on. And it's created higher prices for all of us.
Dana Mattioli
Huh. So are you an Amazon prime member? Do you use Amazon?
Barry Ritholtz
We have a Prime account because my husband watches football and they have Thursday Night Football. We don't really shop on it, though.
Dana Mattioli
You don't?
Barry Ritholtz
Very rarely.
Dana Mattioli
Huh. That's really interesting. All right, let's jump to our favorite questions we ask all of our guests, starting with, so what are you streaming these days? What are you either listening to on Audible? What are you watching on Amazon prime or Netflix or Apple? What's keeping you entertained besides Thursday Night Football?
Barry Ritholtz
I watched Nobody Wants this. That was very good.
Dana Mattioli
Charming.
Barry Ritholtz
Really, really good. I listened to my favorite murder. It's a true crime podcast. I'm a murderino, they call it.
Dana Mattioli
Tell us about your early mentors who helped shape your career.
Barry Ritholtz
Oh, gosh, I have so many of them. Joanne Lublin, who was this dynamo at the Wall Street Journal. Dana Simoluca, my former boss at the Wall Street Journal. And M and A. Jamie Heller, who's now the CEO of Business Insider. Dennis Berman, who is an amazing M and A reporter at the Journal. And Drew Dowell, I would say, who he's now overseas for us.
Dana Mattioli
Let's talk about books. What are your favorites? What are you reading right now?
Barry Ritholtz
So some of my favorites are the Moonstone by Wilkie Collins. It's like one of the first Victorian detective mysteries. I love the Brontes and Jane Austen. I know that's like, pretty trite. I'm reading some just fun Halloween type of books right now. This book called Lucy Foley called the Midnight Feast. That's been really fun. And I love Sally Rooney. I have her new book ready to read after this one.
Dana Mattioli
All right, our final two questions. What sort of advice would you give to a recent college grad interested in a career in either journalism, MA Retail. What's your advice?
Barry Ritholtz
Journalism. I mean, you have to hustle. I would say it's to get as many bylines as you can, even if it's not at one of the prestige newspapers. At first, I fully believe the way I got hired at the Journal was freelancing my college papers, my college articles to other places to get a byline in tiny newspapers that probably don't exist anymore. And you just have to be reporting around you all the time, making sources wherever you are, keeping a great Rolodex. So I think that's the most important thing you could do.
Dana Mattioli
And what do you know about the world of journalism today? You Wish you knew 20 years or so ago when you were first starting out.
Barry Ritholtz
Oh my gosh. When I first started out, dot com was like not even that much of a thing, right? You know, WSJ.com was this like, bastard stepchild, right? And that's what I was put on, actually. I think. I wish I knew that you just have to be so resilient in this profession that if you're doing your job well, it means a lot of rejection that you're gonna cold call people and they're gonna hang up on you and that's fine. You cold call the next one. You just get up again and get up again. Because so much of journalism is a numbers game, huh?
Dana Mattioli
Really, really interesting. Thank you, Dana, for being so generous with your time. We have been speaking with Dana Mattioli. She covers Amazon for the Wall Street Journal and is the author of the book the Everything Amazon's Ruthless Quest to Own the World and Remake Corporate Power. If you enjoy this conversation, well, be sure and check out any of the 500 or so previous discussions we've had over the past 10 years. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, Bloomberg, wherever you find your favorite podcast. And be sure and check out my new short forum podcast at the Money Short conversations with experts about single topics that affect your money. Earning it, spending it, and most importantly, investing it at the money in the Masters in Business feed or wherever you find your favorite podcast. I would be remiss if I did not thank the crack team that helps us put these conversations together each week. Sarah Livesey is my audio engineer. Sean Russo is my head of research. Anna Luke is my producer. Sage Bauman is the head of podcasts at Bloomberg. I'm Barry Gary Ritholtz. You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.
Ms. Klein
From hobby farmers to weekend gardeners and everyone in between, tractor supply trusts 5G solutions from T Mobile for Business to make shopping more personal. Together we're connecting over 2,200 stores with 5G business Internet and powering AI system so team members can match shoppers with products faster.
Barry Ritholtz
You're all set.
Ms. Klein
This is enriching customer experience. This is Tractor Supply with T Mobile for Business. Take your business further@t mobile.com now.
Barry Ritholtz
This podcast is supported by BetterHelp, offering licensed therapists you can connect with via video phone or chat. Here's BetterHelp head of clinical operations, Hes Yu Jo discussing who can benefit from therapy.
Hes Yu Jo
I think a lot of people think that you're supposed to be going to therapy. Once you're like having panic attacks every day. But before you get to that point, I think once you start even noticing that you feel a little bit off and you can't maintain this harmony that you once had in relationships. That could be a sign that maybe you want to go talk to somebody. There's always a benefit in talking to someone because we can all benefit from improved insight about ourselves and who we are and how we behave with other people. So if you're human, that's like a good indicator that you could benefit from talking to somebody.
Barry Ritholtz
Find out if therapy is right for you. Visit betterhelp.com today. That's betterhelp.com.
Masters in Business: Amazon's 'Everything War' with Dana Mattioli
Episode Overview In this episode of Masters in Business, hosted by Barry Ritholtz of Bloomberg Radio, Dana Mattioli, the Amazon reporter for the Wall Street Journal and author of the book The Everything Amazon's Ruthless Quest to Own the World and Remake Corporate Power, delves deep into Amazon's expansive influence across multiple industries, its aggressive corporate culture, and the ethical dilemmas it presents. Released on December 19, 2024, this episode offers listeners an insightful exploration of how Amazon has transformed from an online bookstore into a global conglomerate wielding immense power over markets, competitors, and consumers.
Barry Ritholtz introduces Dana Mattioli, highlighting her role as the Amazon reporter for the Wall Street Journal and her award-winning background in covering mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and retail. Mattioli discusses her new book, which provides a comprehensive and meticulously researched account of Amazon's strategies to dominate various sectors.
Notable Quote:
"I had no idea. You know, as I'm reading the book, I'm just genuinely shocked." — Dana Mattioli [00:55]
Mattioli shares her career trajectory, starting at the Wall Street Journal in 2006 right after college. She recounts her progression from covering retail giants like J.C. Penney and Macy's to specializing in M&A reporting. Her experience covering pivotal deals, such as the Pfizer-Allergan merger, provided her with unique insights into how Amazon began to unsettle traditional retailers.
Notable Quote:
"I frankly feel like I just plowed through it regardless. It was really fascinating." — Dana Mattioli [01:01]
Mattioli and Ritholtz discuss Amazon's transformation into a market leader across eight different industries, including online retail, cloud computing (Amazon Web Services), data package delivery, and voice assistant devices. They highlight Amazon's ability to leverage its vast resources to outcompete and often undercut traditional players.
Notable Quote:
"They've taken over industry after industry, and that's forced bankruptcies, it's forced lack of innovation." — Barry Ritholtz [09:38]
The conversation shifts to Amazon's ambitious Project Kuiper, aimed at deploying orbital satellites to compete with Elon Musk's Starlink. Mattioli explains how this move positions Amazon to potentially expand its internet service capabilities, thereby reinforcing its dominance in e-commerce and cloud services.
Notable Quote:
"They're going to go head to head with Elon Musk's Starlink with these satellites, these orbital satellites." — Barry Ritholtz [11:16]
A significant portion of the discussion centers on Amazon's notoriously competitive and high-pressure work environment. Mattioli details how Amazon's forced ranking system, which targets the bottom 6% of employees, fosters a toxic culture where employees may engage in unethical practices to meet performance metrics.
Notable Quote:
"Every single team. Every single team." — Barry Ritholtz [15:51]
Key Points:
Mattioli and Ritholtz explore Amazon's strategies that undermine competitors, such as predatory pricing, reverse engineering successful third-party products, and leveraging Amazon Web Services to dominate the tech infrastructure market. They discuss how these practices have led to the downfall of numerous retailers and raised substantial antitrust concerns.
Notable Quote:
"They could flood the feed with advertisements that are annoying to you. They could do all these things to make it a lesser experience." — Barry Ritholtz [19:54]
Key Points:
One of the episode's highlights is the detailed account of Amazon's battle with Quidsi, the parent company of Diapers.com. Mattioli recounts how Amazon engaged in a pricing war, drastically undercutting Quidsi's prices to unsustainable levels, forcing the startup to sell to Walmart instead of Amazon. This maneuver effectively removed a competitor from the market, demonstrating Amazon's willingness to sacrifice billions to maintain its dominance.
Notable Quote:
"It's the definition of predatory pricing. It's 2010. Jeff Bezos becomes laser focused on Quidsi." — Barry Ritholtz [51:46]
The discussion turns to AWS, Amazon's cloud computing division, which has become a cornerstone of its profitability. Mattioli explains how AWS originated from Amazon's internal need for scalable computing power and evolved into a lucrative service used by major companies like Netflix, Apple, and even government agencies.
Notable Quote:
"Once you're on it, you don't really leave." — Barry Ritholtz [43:46]
Key Points:
Mattioli and Ritholtz discuss the evolving landscape of antitrust enforcement, particularly focusing on Lina Khan's influential work and the FTC's ongoing lawsuit against Amazon. They examine how regulatory actions could reshape online retail, potentially curbing Amazon's expansive reach and fostering a more competitive market environment.
Notable Quote:
"It's the most competitor-obsessed company I've ever covered." — Barry Ritholtz [26:01]
Key Points:
In wrapping up, Barry and Dana reflect on the pervasive influence of Amazon and the ethical considerations surrounding its business practices. Mattioli emphasizes the human cost of Amazon's relentless pursuit of market dominance, highlighting stories of lost jobs, compromised product quality, and the personal toll on former employees and competitors.
Notable Quote:
"This company that didn't need to do these things to win, chose to." — Barry Ritholtz [51:07]
Final Insights:
Key Takeaways:
For more in-depth insights, listeners are encouraged to read Dana Mattioli's book and follow Bloomberg's extensive coverage on Amazon and corporate practices shaping today's business landscape.