← Masters in Business
Loading summary
Transcript212 lines
- [00:00]
Barry Ritholtz
This is an iHeart podcast.
- [00:05]
Steve Laipley
When you're with Amex Business Platinum, going the extra mile for your business pays off. With five times membership rewards points on flights and prepaid hotels booked through amextravel.com, you can earn more points to help grow your business. And with access to more than 1,400 lounges globally through the American Express Global Lounge Collection, including the Centurion Lounge.
- [00:24]
Can I get you a refill?
- [00:25]
You can stay fresh wherever your business travel takes you. That's the powerful backing of American Express. Terms apply. Learn more@americanexpress.com AmExBusiness did you know that.
- [00:36]
Bloomberg Reporter
92% of US hiring decision makers expect to face challenges finding qualified candidates this year? The costs of recruiting, advertising, interviewing and onboarding can add up quickly, but Express employment professionals is your hiring Solution. Go to ExpressPros.com today. Express streamlines your hiring process, saving both time and money. Whether you need contract staff or your core team member, visit expresspros.com Thrivent can.
- [01:08]
Barry Ritholtz
Help you plan your finances for the people, causes and community you love. What makes Thrivent different financial services and generosity programs are combined to help you build a financial roadmap for the future while also creating opportunities to give back along the way. Visit thrivent.com to learn more. Thrivent Where Money Means More.
- [01:31]
Steve Laipley
Bloomberg Audio Studios Podcasts Radio News this is Masters in Business with Barry Ritholtz on Bloomberg Radio.
- [01:44]
Barry Ritholtz
This week on the podcast, yet another extra special guest. Steve Lipley is global co head of bond ETFs and investment giant BlackRock. He helps to oversee over a trillion dollars in bond ETFs. He's got a fascinating background at both bank of America, Merrill lynch and since 2009 at BGI and Blackrock. I thought this conversation was really fascinating. There are few people in the world of fixed income that understands the bond market, the ETF market, what the Fed's doing, what is driving both institutional and household investors on the fixed income side. I thought this conversation was absolutely fascinating and I think you will also. With no further ado, my conversation with BlackRock's co head of bond ETFs Steve Leibly. Steve Leiply, welcome to Bloomberg.
- [02:42]
Steve Laipley
Thanks for having me, Barry.
- [02:44]
Barry Ritholtz
So what a perfect time to have somebody who specializes in fixed income and bonds. We've had all sorts of mayhem with tariffs on, tariffs off, rates up, rates down, yields starting to creep higher and higher. But before we get into what's going on today, let's talk a little bit about you and your background. B.S. degree in finance from University of Miami. MBA from Wharton Finance. Always the career plan.
- [03:13]
Steve Laipley
Not quite. So I went to Miami University in Ohio. Actually, I grew up in a small town in Ohio. Yeah. So went there for. Ultimately ended up in the business school. I did start off thinking, you know, as many people might, that, oh, what should I do? Should I be a doctor or a lawyer? I decided to try doctor. I love biology. Organic chemistry, not so much.
- [03:34]
Barry Ritholtz
That's the, that's the gut course that screens a lot of doc fusion future docs out.
- [03:38]
Steve Laipley
Yeah. So I had a good friend who said, hey, I'm taking finance. I really like it. Maybe give it a shot. I took a finance class, really liked it a lot. It's sort of like math with dollar signs attached to it. So that's sort of the way I viewed. I really enjoyed it. And that was kind of, that was kind of it. I was hooked.
- [03:56]
Barry Ritholtz
So University of Miami in Ohio is going to scratch out my next question, which is how do you get anything done in the Florida sun in Miami? But Ohio, I bet is a little easier. Study type of regime a little bit.
- [04:11]
Steve Laipley
It's still, it's a beautiful campus, a lot of fun. But. But yeah, it's, it was, it was a good experience.
- [04:16]
Barry Ritholtz
So. So you come out of Wharton, we'll talk a little bit about iShares and your previous history at bank of America Merrill Lynch. But what was it that drew you to fixed income?
- [04:27]
Steve Laipley
I think a couple of things. One, I really, I really did enjoy sort of the, the variety of things in fixed income. You know, I mean, you know, equities can be complex in their own right, but fixed income, you can have so many different types of instruments and cash flows and structures. And it was just really interesting to me to see that variety.
- [04:49]
Barry Ritholtz
And what do we have something like 3,500 individual equities outside of the pink sheets. And how many CUSIPs are there for fixed income?
- [04:57]
Steve Laipley
So I did this, I did this exercise on Bloomberg. Depending on how you filter. Well, north of a million. Right. Well, north. And it's you. You might even get multiples of that depending on how you filter. But yeah, fixed income, as you know, once you, once you issue that, a company's going to issue debt, you know, perpetually, they're going to keep issuing new cusips over time. So. So it adds up.
- [05:20]
Barry Ritholtz
No, no doubt. So you're at Bank America Merrill lynch as a senior member of the interest rate structuring and strategic solutions. Sounds very institutional. Tell us a little bit about your time at Bank America Merrill Lynch.
- [05:36]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, So I think that group, the idea was to work with institutional clients to really help them manage risk. Right. And so it was about using derivatives in particular in a sensible way to come up with hedging strategies. So my, my particular focus was on the mortgage servicing community. They had a very, very complex asset. They still do. It's a little bit different now, all these years later, but they had a tremendous amount of interest rate risk in those servicing. Right. Assets. Right. So my job was to work with them, to come up with, you know, thoughtful ways to hedge that risk. And there are, you know, some very, very vanilla ways to do it. But, you know, we wanted to really try to be, you know, more thoughtful and much more tailored. And that was, that was what I spent a lot of time doing. I really enjoyed it.
- [06:27]
Barry Ritholtz
When I think of hedging risk on the fixed income side, not specific to that era, which was kind of unique, I think of interest rate risk, credit risk, the underlying security that subsequently gets securitized. Am I warm? Tell me if that's about right. Okay. What else do you consider when you're trying to find a way to hedge a fixed income risk?
- [06:51]
Steve Laipley
Yeah. And so you just, you just nailed almost all of it. So depending on what it is. So when you're dealing with something like a mortgage servicing, right, that's that lender, you know, sells the loan off, and then somebody retains that annuity that can get prepaid. So you go pay off your mortgage, I go pay off my mortgage, that annuity disappears. There's optionality there. You have to hedge that, Right. So you have interest rate risk, volatility risk. Things move up and down, the more likely you are to decide if rates fall to prepay. So it's all of that good stuff. And then, yes, you can have credit risk and other types of assets as well.
- [07:25]
Barry Ritholtz
You use one of my favorite words, optionality. Because every time I have a discussion with people who are not in the world of finance, and they say, have you ever calculated how much it costs to take your boat or jet ski out and figure out what, what each ride costs you? And I'm like, you don't understand optionality. I have the ability to do that every single day. Whether I choose to exercise that or not, that is still a value that would cost somebody something. You join a boat club or a rental club or whatever. Lay people don't get optionality. Tell us how that applies in fixed income.
- [08:03]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, and you see this in different ways, Barry. So, I mean, not dissimilar, Right? So as an example, again, Going back to the homeowner part, if you have a mortgage, you can decide to prepay that. A lot of people don't. Interestingly, there are stories that, that exist, and I'm sure you've heard them, where people still have 10% mortgages somewhere.
- [08:21]
Barry Ritholtz
Get out. Is that true?
- [08:22]
Steve Laipley
There are stories about that. And so if you look at statistics, I haven't done this in a while, by the way. So hopefully after this long period of time, maybe they've paid them off. But you can find these very high coupon mortgages that are still out there and nobody really knows why they haven't paid them off. But it is your right. But you're not forced to pay it off. You would think you'd want to if interest rates were low enough, but that exists in different ways. Just like when companies issue debt, a lot of times they'll issue callable debt. So, same idea. If interest rates fall or credit spreads tighten, they can call that debt and issue cheaper debt. Right. And so that, that's, that's just sort of a basic tenet of how people like to structure their, their liabilities.
- [09:02]
Barry Ritholtz
My equity version of that is BlackRock S&P 500 fund is like 5 bips. 4 bips. It's like practically free. And sometimes portfolios come into the office. And why are you paying 100 basis points for what's effectively an S&P 500 index? Why don't we save you 95 bips a year compounded over 20 years? That's a lot of money. So the market is kind of sort of almost efficient is. I don't know how else to describe it.
- [09:33]
Steve Laipley
No, I think that's right. I mean, in. Over time, you know, we, we really started to see investors gravitate towards this idea of efficiency. And, you know, again, you. This is a theme that you really, really hammer home, which is, you know, basic sort of blocking and tackling is don't surrender a lot of your return to fees. I think everybody thinks that's incredibly important. It took a while for people to wake up to it, but I do think over time, people have really started to understand that fees matter. The strategy matters too, but the fees matter as well. And so we have.
- [10:07]
Barry Ritholtz
You want both?
- [10:07]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, you want both. You want both.
- [10:09]
Barry Ritholtz
So I know we'll get to Blackrock starting in 09, but how long were you at bank of America for?
- [10:15]
Steve Laipley
From 97 through 09.
- [10:17]
Barry Ritholtz
Oh, so you watched the debacle. Front row.
- [10:21]
Steve Laipley
Front row.
- [10:22]
Barry Ritholtz
Did you start at Merrill? Did you start at Bank America?
- [10:24]
Steve Laipley
I started at Merrill.
- [10:25]
Barry Ritholtz
Oh, you did? So a lot of people slagged. Was it John Thune? I thought he cut a great deal. That worked out really well for Merrill employees and relatively well for Merrill shareholders, at least compared to, you know, Bear Stearns and Lehman and so many other companies. He, he did a solid, and it took a while before people recognized it. What was your experience like going through that mayhem?
- [10:51]
Steve Laipley
I mean, it was stressful, as you know. I was not involved with the particular businesses that were under stress, but it was stressful for all of us.
- [10:58]
Barry Ritholtz
Oh, sure.
- [10:59]
Steve Laipley
As the headlines scrolled day after day, you know, was a front seat in history as well, turns out. And so I think, you know, hopefully a lot of lessons have been learned from, from, you know, that period of time, as you know, and I think you've said this many times, each crisis looks a little bit different. So hopefully we take lessons from the last one and that starts building a knowledge base up over time. So maybe the next time we're a little bit better equipped to deal with it. But, but it was. Yes, it was an interesting time.
- [11:30]
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, to say the very least. Hopefully we take the. Sometimes we, we draw the wrong lessons. That's a whole nother story. So how did you find your way over to Blackrock in 2009? I'm assuming that was once the dust settled a little bit. Was it late past March 09?
- [11:46]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, it was. It was interesting. You know, you, you have sort of contact and networking with different folks. And I had, and it was at the time, Barclays Global Investors. And I did know, I did know a couple of, a couple of folks over there. And we had just, you know, had casual conversations, but at one point, and this is a former mentor of mine, gentleman named Matt Tucker, reached out to me and said, hey, you know, this is an interesting opportunity. It's called Bond ETFs. It's, it's a business that, that I've really been working hard on over here. And I'm looking for a skill set that, that sort of maps to that. And, and, you know, I kind of think that, that your background might be, might be interesting for this. So, you know, let's, let's talk about it and then, you know, sort of the rest is history. But I was very, very excited about it. And there is a funny story to this, which is I discovered Bond ETFs on my own sort of accidentally. I was trying to buy Treasuries, and I was very frustrated by the commissions I was getting charged on that. A colleague actually pointed me to the iShares website and showed me that Bond ETFs actually exist and you could simply buy this on exchange without actually having to buy physical bonds and, you know, pay a commission for it. So.
- [13:02]
Barry Ritholtz
And not only was the commission, you know, next to nothing, the spread and the price discovery seem to be a little friendlier to buyers.
- [13:10]
Steve Laipley
I was really blown away by that and I could not stop, you know, scrolling through that website and fascinated by the idea that you could take bonds and put them on exchange. Absolutely fascinated by that and feeling a little stupid that I hadn't stumbled on it before. But so the fun part about that was it helped a little bit in the interviews to be able to say, yes, I'm familiar and by the way, yes, I'm actually a customer, albeit at a small scale.
- [13:37]
Barry Ritholtz
For those people who are unfamiliar with BGI or Barclays Global Investments, eventually what I have argued is the single greatest acquisition in at least wealth management history. Barclays Global gets bought up by BlackRock and the whole iShares product line gets really supersized with just a much savvier group of product developers, marketers, traders. Just everything about it went next level. How much of that were you there to witness? Did you start at BGI or just start a blackrock?
- [14:17]
Steve Laipley
It's funny because people often ask me, what was BGI like? I was there for one month before the actual.
- [14:23]
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, so like what I've heard through the grapevine is it was a solid shop with a great product. A little sleepy kind of backwater. If you are at bank of America, Merrill lynch and you still haven't discovered their bond ETFs, somebody is not doing the marketing job they should have.
- [14:41]
Steve Laipley
Well, it was interesting. They were very much, I think, quantitative and academically oriented and I think, I think a little bit of the culture was okay with, with being, you know, somewhat under the radar because it was, you know, a very proprietary place. And so that. That might be. Might be some of it. But yeah, blackrock did come in and you know, they did. That deal was interesting. If I don't know if you remember, Barry, there were. There were some discussions about whether, you know, it would be some sort of a private deal or what have you. And then BlackRock kind of came in and said, we'll take the whole thing in. That. That was announced I think in June. So I'd only been there a very short period of time and then it closed in the fall. And I will never forget, you could tell that blackrock was very efficient at this because the day after the Merger closed. The signage was up on the building. You walked in, all the screensavers had changed overnight. You had a nice pad notepad with the logo on it and you know, some nice pens and all that stuff. So very, very impressive how they were able to do this so cleanly and quickly.
- [15:46]
Barry Ritholtz
That's fascinating. And I failed to mention BlackRock is a little shop over on the west side of the city. 11 $12 trillion in assets. Somewhere in that range. How big chunk is fixed income and fixed income ETFs at BlackRock we just.
- [16:02]
Steve Laipley
Hit 1 trillion in fixed income ETFs.
- [16:05]
Barry Ritholtz
So keep at it, you'll get some AUM soon.
- [16:07]
Steve Laipley
Keep plugging away, keep plugging away. Yeah. And you know, the industry is, is now, globally the industry is approaching 3 trillion. We're at around 2.8 trillion and change. And we think that number is going to get to six by the end of the decade for the industry and we hope to be obviously a sizable chunk of that. But it's been, you know, it's been experiencing double digit growth, you know, for years and years and it's just been a very, you know, fast moving river for us.
- [16:34]
Barry Ritholtz
Huh. Really, really quite fascinating. So Steve, you just mentioned you think bond ETFs can reach $6 trillion by 2030, is that right? What is the key driver of that growth that's doubling in less than five years?
- [16:51]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, and it's a number of things and we've talked about these trends. So I think you have, you have a series of waves of adoption that happen. And it's interesting because where we tend to see the largest uptake of bond ETFs is when you have stress markets. And so I think this is, we have several, several test cases at this point. So you know, we've had many ones since the financial crisis. So financial crisis happened and I think that's the first time where I personally started getting reverse inquiry from sophisticated investors asking about the bond ETFs because they noticed that even at the worst of it, let's call it September or October of 08, they were still trading on exchange very robustly. Other markets not doing so well. Right. And so that got the attention of a lot of investors at that time. Products are probably too small for a lot of those investors. But they became very intrigued by them over the ensuing years. You had a, you know, you would have occasional blips in the markets, whether it was, you know, some sort of an energy dislocation and high yield or what have you. But what we noticed was every Single time you would have one of these stressed markets, you'd see a huge surge in volumes in bond ETF trading on exchange. That would get the attention of larger investors. They would start adopting the products. Why? Because when you need to trade something, you were able to trade bond ETFs, even if other things were really struggling to trade. And so every single time you'd have one of these waves of dislocation and fixed income, you started seeing more and more and more investors gravitate to bond ETFs. The big one was Covid. So for sure, February, March 2020, you know, even Treasuries, high quality, investment grade, you know, the whole thing, everything was seeing dislocation, right? And so that's when we saw probably our largest wave of adoption in fixed income ETFs was during that period of time, same story. You saw things that people would just take for granted, suddenly struggling, you know, in terms of bid, ask and depth of liquidity. But what could you trade? You could trade bond ETFs, you could trade them in size. That got at that point a lot of attention because now the products have scaled to a level where even the largest investors could use them in their portfolios. And so that was interesting.
- [19:15]
Barry Ritholtz
So you're absolutely preaching to the choir. I have heard mostly on the equity side, but also on the fixed income side. You know, these ETFs, you don't know what the underlying is priced at. They're filled with all sorts of stuff. It's really hard to get a print on. When it hits the fan, you're not gonna be able to get in or out of it. You're gonna have giant spreads and no liquidity. That wasn't true in'08'09. That wasn't true during the flash crash Covid. And the most recent tariff volatility. Even in 22, when stocks and bonds were both down double digits for the first time in four plus decades, ETFs traded like rock stars. Why is this such persistent squabbling? You know, you'll see. Just wait. Is it that people are losing business to ETFs? Why is there so much fear and concern that for 25 years have been completely unjustified?
- [20:14]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, I think it's a little bit of. It might be a little bit of.
- [20:18]
Barry Ritholtz
The sour grapes, a little bit.
- [20:19]
Steve Laipley
But I think part of it too was after the crisis, there was, it felt to me like there was this search for what's the next thing, right? What's the next thing that could go wrong? Not Quite sure where, why that focus shifted to ETFs, but it was ETFs and probably a number of other things. But I think the idea of a bond ETF in particular drew attention because the talk track was, well, you're taking something over the counter and you're putting inside this box and you're putting this box on exchange. And that might, you know, cause some, some interesting things to happen. And in reality, what we've seen is just the opposite of those fears. Barry, again, just, you know, you pointed out the tariff volatility. Same story, different verse, right? So you have, you know, markets are really, really stressed. You see a lot of dislocations, volumes on exchange once again set new records. I think, you know, on the day of the announcements, I think we saw close to $100 billion of bond ETFs trade on exchange. Way more than the during COVID But the sort of, I think skeptic has always said, well, you know, we haven't seen a good test yet. We haven't seen a good test yet. I think Covid was a good test. This was just a reminder, right? And so really what happens is, you know, the exchange keeps trading even if the underlying doesn't. And unlike, you know, the fears, you don't see these quote unquote forced redemptions or anything like that. Nobody's forced to redeem an etf. It can just trade on exchange. And I think that's the elegance of it. And it gets proven time and time again.
- [21:53]
In business. They say you can have better, cheaper or faster, but you only get to pick two. What if you could have all three at the same time? That's exactly what Cohere, Thomson Reuters and Specialized Bikes have since they upgraded to the next generation of the cloud. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure OCI is the blazing fast platform for your infrastructure, database, application development and AI needs. Where you can run any workload in a high availability, consistently high performance environment and spend less than you would with other clouds. How is it faster? OCI's block storage gives you more operations per second cheaper. OCI costs up to 50% less for computing, 70% less for storage and 80% less for networking. Better. In test after test, OCI customers report lower latency and in higher bandwidth versus other clouds. This is the cloud built for AI and all your biggest workloads right now with zero commitment. Try OCI for free. Head to oracle.com strategic that's oracle.com strategic.
- [23:00]
Bloomberg Reporter
The data that matters for your investments.
- [23:02]
Barry Ritholtz
The entire auto sector is higher today.
- [23:05]
Bloomberg Reporter
And analysis on the Companies making news on Wall Street.
- [23:08]
Steve Laipley
Tesla's been a stock that's been in focus.
- [23:09]
Shares have really been all over the map this morning.
- [23:12]
Bloomberg Reporter
Listen to the Stock Movers Report from Bloomberg.
- [23:14]
Bloomberg Event Announcer
Let's talk about some other decliners.
- [23:17]
Bloomberg Reporter
It's your short audio report on the day's winners and losers in the stock market, second biggest driver in terms of points for the S&P 500. Subscribe to the Stock Movers Report on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen.
- [23:30]
Bloomberg Event Announcer
Join us in Atlanta or via livestream on Aug. 12 for Bloomberg's Business Value of AI event and networking reception. This event will gather business and technology executives to share their experiences and provide insight into how to best use data to optimize the customer experience. You'll also learn how companies have successfully implemented AI agents that have led to improved productivity and profitability. This program is proudly sponsored by IBM. Register@BloombergLive.com AI Atlanta so I just want.
- [24:01]
Barry Ritholtz
To define some terms you reference. Cause in the back of my head I'm always thinking, does my real estate agent mom or my art teacher wife know what that means? So when we talk about on the exchange, we're talking about anything that's publicly traded that you could just log onto your online trading account, buy or sell instantly. When we talk about over the counter otc, that's one bond desk calling another bond desk and saying, hey, do you guys have this 2019, you know, muni California muni series, whatever. And someone has to go locate that. So over the counter means two people literally speaking to each other to engage in a transaction. Is that, is that a fair description?
- [24:46]
Steve Laipley
That's exactly right. And so yes, over time, bond trading has gotten more efficient. You know, in the underlying market you have electronic trading of Treasuries and now, and now credit. But you know, if you go back 20 years when ETFs were first new, Bond ETFs were first new, it was still very much a voice market. It was a very much pick up the phone exactly as you described. And even today, I think even the most sophisticated institutions still believe in the efficiency and the elegance of being able to trade a bond ETF on exchange. You're trading if you just step back for a second and think about what you're actually doing. You're trading hundreds or sometimes thousands of bonds simultaneously at a penny bid, ask on exchange, you actually still can't do that in the underlying market. So, you know, it doesn't matter if you're an individual, it doesn't matter if you're a Large sovereign wealth fund. That's still a very impressive feat to be able to, to do a transaction like that. And Bond ETFs allow you to do that. But I want to get back to, you know, you had asked, what are sort of the long term drivers? I think this idea of just, okay, you can trade these things when you need to, that's important. Another one would be when we're building portfolios, and we see this both again on the wealth and on the institutional side, do we need to build portfolios with hundreds or thousands of bonds, or could we take a low cost bond ETF as sort of the core of that portfolio? Could we then use individual bonds to sort of flavor that or tilt that in different ways and then maybe add our favorite active managers on top of that? Might that be a more efficient way to do it than just going out and buying, you know, to your point, picking up the phone and calling around and putting together hundreds or however many bonds, which might take days or weeks. And so I think there's this growing realization that, you know what, it's fine to trade in and out when things are volatile, but actually might be more efficient to use these things long term in a bond portfolio. So I think that's a huge part of the adoption too, is the recognition that this might be a smarter way to build bond portfolios in general.
- [26:46]
Barry Ritholtz
On the equity side, I'm fond of telling people, before you go chasing alpha, why don't you at least lock in beta? And I'm pleased to hear that's a similar approach on the fixed income side.
- [27:00]
Steve Laipley
Very much, Very much. And I think it's a, and this has been a journey because, you know, you've run into this, and I've heard you talk about this on your show before. Everybody wants to believe that, you know, if I'm buying this security, I have intent, I did my homework, it matters a great deal. And that may be true for that security, but when you do that a hundred times, some of that starts getting canceled out, right? And so that's when you have to step back and say, all right, if I'm looking at my portfolio holistically, I want a certain beta, I want a certain tilt, I want a certain amount of yield coming from, you know, one place or another. What's the most efficient and the cheapest way to do that? And that's, I think people are slowly recognizing that maybe the ETF actually has that, that has that utility.
- [27:45]
Barry Ritholtz
So this is a good time to ask a question about active fixed income investing. It seems like, it's super challenging. On the equity side, we all know the stats. 60% of active managers underperform the benchmark in year one. By the time you get to five years it's 80 plus, 10 years, it's 90 plus. And by the time you get to 21, it's a handful of guys like Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch. I don't see that uphill battle the same on the fixed income side, it seems like fixed income active does much better than fixed income equity. Is that fair or.
- [28:27]
Steve Laipley
I think there are a few things. So one, we think that all investing is active to a degree. Right? You're making decisions. So if you're using ETFs, you're making sort of these broad beta calls and you're deciding which beta, which sector, what have you. So there's an active choice there and how you build that portfolio. But to your point, strictly active and fixed income. What does that mean? That means that, hey, I'm going out and I'm assembling a bond portfolio. I'm going to compare that to a benchmark and I'm going to see if I beat it.
- [28:56]
Barry Ritholtz
And you guys have the Benchmark. The, the ISHU ISHares Core US AG, or as everybody calls it, the AG.
- [29:04]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, the AG. We have AGG, we have the Universal, which is IUSB. One of the things that we've been vocal about is which benchmark are you looking at? Because sometimes you'll see a manager buy a bunch of high yield bonds in their portfolio. Not all, but like they'll hold, you know, a large allocation of high yield bonds benchmark to the aggregate, which has none, and say, oh look, I'm beating the aggregate now that's, that's fine. By taking on more risk, they're taking on more risk. Okay, that's fine. You may give some of that back every call it five years. Right. What we sort of preach to is, okay, let's get benchmarks that look a little bit closer to the risk you're taking and see what you're actually adding through security selection. Right. So some of it's benchmark misspecification, but fixed income markets still are less liquid, they're more fragmented. So yes, there are opportunities there. And so, you know, people often ask me, do you believe in active or quote, passive? We call passive index. Because actually even in, in, in index.
- [30:05]
Barry Ritholtz
Still an active choice.
- [30:06]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, exactly.
- [30:06]
Barry Ritholtz
So wait, market cap weighting, that's a choice.
- [30:09]
Steve Laipley
It's a choice. So my answer to that is we believe in all of the above. We think the best portfolios have elements of both of these things. Index and quote unquote, active together. Much better portfolio, much more resilient than just sort of suiciding one or the other. Oh, I'm all active or I'm all index. Right. So we think both makes a lot of sense. And that's, that's how we sort of design our product set.
- [30:33]
Barry Ritholtz
Given the million plus CUSIPs, the million plus bonds that are out there. My simple thesis was always, if you want to be an active fixed income manager, how hard is it to screen out the lowest quality, weakest credit, poorest, poorest yield relative to risk you have to take? And if you're just cutting out the bottom half of that, that should do better than, than whatever the AG is going to do or whatever your benchmark is. Because there's, you know, hey, there's 3500 stocks, not all of which are great. A million bonds, there's a lot of room for the bottom. Pick a number, decile, quartile, half a lot of junk can get mixed up into that. I don't mean high yield, I mean lower quality fixed income opportunities.
- [31:21]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, and this is the trick with fixed income. You could see great opportunities, but when you try to act on them, it can be really costly to actually implement. And that cost or just can you find that bond? Right, so you located the search costs, the actual transaction costs.
- [31:37]
Barry Ritholtz
Wait, there's a search cost for locating a bond? I always thought it was kind of built into the transaction cost. I didn't realize. Hey, find me this. That's going to cost you just to ask that question.
- [31:48]
Steve Laipley
Well, let's call, let's call that the time it takes to actually get a hold of it. You're sitting in cash, right? And I've heard you say this many times, you probably should not be sitting in cash very long. It's a medium of exchange. Right.
- [32:00]
Barry Ritholtz
So that's right.
- [32:01]
Steve Laipley
But this is the time it takes you to locate that particular bond and then you have to pay the transaction cost, you know, the bid, ask on top of it. So, you know, yes, optically you could see opportunities all over the place. The question is, are you able to actually move on them and implement them at the right price? And that's where there's a lot of skill involved in fixed income, I think.
- [32:23]
Barry Ritholtz
And I've heard some clients say, especially institutional clients, listen, my cash, my money allocation I've got, that I've hired you to do. You're my equity guy, you're my fixed Income, you're my opportunistic distress guy. I don't need you to carry cash. And I wonder how that impacts people's thoughts of when you start to see 1, 2, 3, 4% creeping up as a cash balance. Got to put that money to work. There's an opportunity cost of just sitting in cash. Fair.
- [32:56]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, there is. I think what has happened the last couple of years is, you know, money market assets are, you know, in the trillions.
- [33:05]
Barry Ritholtz
Well, now that it's four and a.
- [33:06]
Steve Laipley
Half, now that it's four and a half percent. And so there's been a little bit of what I would call, I think, apprehension of giving up that certain or what people view as certain, you know, four and a half to 5% and then moving out. The trick to that is, you know, if you wait too long, right, the market's going to move past you.
- [33:25]
Barry Ritholtz
And we've watched it, you know, it broke below 4, went back over 5. You're not locking that in, you're taking what. Look, if you're saving for a house or something six months a year down the road and you're afraid of, you know, 2022 type year, of course a money market makes perfect sense. But if you're looking out a couple of years, you want a product where you can sort of lock in a higher yield, fair statement.
- [33:51]
Steve Laipley
Yeah. And you also want to be able to have it. So look, cash is great. We, we launched money market ETFs. Cash plays a role in a portfolio. To your point, it shouldn't be a huge part of the portfolio. You need to get those assets allocated, you know, on a risk basis. So whether it's, you know, equities, safe bonds, riskier bonds, it's like an orchestra, right? You have your string section, your horn section, they all need to play together. And just sitting on the sidelines, that's okay for a while, but it's, it doesn't make very good music. You need to actually have everything, you know, kind of playing its role in the portfolio. And so I, long term, that is what's going to actually, you know, build your return.
- [34:30]
Barry Ritholtz
Right. And I'm spitballing these numbers off the top of my head. I have to double check them. But I want to say cash is a drag on performance. 4 to 5 years in equity and 9 out of 10 years in fixed income. Am I close there, ballpark?
- [34:44]
Steve Laipley
Haven't heard that part on fixed income, but I see your point. I mean, you know, if you just sit forever and the Fed cuts rates, you're going to miss it. Right. And so that's, that's. Right, that's. And you know, and I think the consensus right now is, ah, you know, maybe they'll cut a couple times this year, maybe a couple times next year. Things can move pretty quickly on the ground. And, you know, it's one of those things where, you know. Yeah. By the time you wake up and decide to move, the market may have already moved past you. I mean, to your point, we were at around four and a half percent almost a year ago. And guess where we're sitting at today? Around 4.5%. But it's been quite a bumpy ride up and down. And so who knows where we'll be in six months.
- [35:23]
Barry Ritholtz
So the question is of if you were sitting in money markets for the past year or you had bought some equivalent bond ETF, which performed better over the past 12 months given all the volatility.
- [35:37]
Steve Laipley
Well, on a risk adjusted basis, you could say, all right, I had less risk in the money market and I'm sort of sitting where I was, you know, a year ago.
- [35:43]
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah. But if you're in high quality bonds, how much risk is there?
- [35:46]
Steve Laipley
If you bought sort of last, if you think about where we were closer to 5%, you know, you actually ended up locking in pretty good yields. Now the one thing I would say is it's hard to time. It's hard to time rates. It might be. Actually the hardest thing to do is to time the top in yields. That can be a very, very fleeting thing. So it's more about get invested, build a durable portfolio, make sure you have risk in the right buckets. You need some high quality bonds for ballast, you need some riskier bonds for income. Right. That all plays together with the equity side and the old side of your portfolio. All these things need to come together. Yes, cash plays a role, but you will probably miss out on some very good opportunities. We haven't had yields like this in 20 years. Right. So are you really going to try to hit the top when you're seeing yields that are as good as they've been in a generation? Yeah. So you can get greedy. Right.
- [36:40]
Barry Ritholtz
But which is kind of funny because it, it. Oh, I always laugh when I think about someone who's 40, 45 years old on a stock desk, on a bond desk, have not seen 7% yields in their entire professional career. And I recall people's bonds coming up like the New York City go bonds finally got called 7% like they were getting. I'm getting 15%. What am I gonna do? With 7%, that was when New York City was gonna collapse. You can't get 15% today. 7% treasuries, hey, that's a good deal. No one realized how great a DEAL it was 25 years ago. But that's just, just the reality.
- [37:21]
Steve Laipley
Yeah. And you do have to go back to the mid-2000s to see yields at these levels. So it's a great opportunity. And you know, rather than saying, well, I really want to hold on until 5%, you know, I mean, you just may miss it. So we, we think it's just a great, great time in fixed income.
- [37:37]
Barry Ritholtz
Absolutely. And I want to just remind everybody who thinks they can time yields or the Fed collectively, everybody has been completely wrong about when the Fed was going to start cutting, how far they were going to cut, how often they would have cut. Like, the consensus could not possibly have been more wrong for like, what, three years, four years. Here comes a recession. Here comes the Fed cuts. Here comes. If you're waiting because you think you can guess, if you're going to be a macro tourist, best of luck to you. Right?
- [38:09]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, exactly. It's build the portfolio for the long term, you know, and you may say, well, I could have gotten a higher yield or hey, I locked in a pretty good yield here. Either way, it's about the next 10 years, it's not about the next month.
- [38:23]
Barry Ritholtz
Huh. Really, really interesting.
- [38:25]
Bloomberg Reporter
The data that matters for your investments.
- [38:28]
Barry Ritholtz
The entire auto sector is higher today.
- [38:30]
Bloomberg Reporter
And analysis on the companies making news on Wall Street.
- [38:33]
Steve Laipley
Tesla has been a stock that's been in focus.
- [38:35]
Years have really been all over the map this morning.
- [38:37]
Bloomberg Reporter
Listen to the stock Movers report from Bloomberg.
- [38:40]
Bloomberg Event Announcer
Let's talk about some other decliners.
- [38:42]
Bloomberg Reporter
It's your short audio report on the day's winners and losers in the stock market. Second biggest driver in terms of points for the S&P 500. Subscribe to the Stock Movers report on Apple podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen.
- [38:55]
Bloomberg Event Announcer
Join us in Seattle July 14th and 15th for Bloomberg Green, two days of powerful conversations and meaningful connections. We'll explore what's next in the climate, economy, clean tech policy and greener living. Featured speakers include Jane Fonda, Ryan Gellert and Vinod Khosla. The title sponsor is Amazon. Official airlines are Alaska and Hawaiian Airlines. Learn more at BloombergLive.com GreenSeattle that's BloombergLive.com.
- [39:23]
Barry Ritholtz
GreenSeattle so let's start out talking about fixed income today and the obvious spike in bond market volatility we've seen this year. Tell us what's going on?
- [39:37]
Steve Laipley
It's, we've covered a couple of these things, but it's. Pick your theme. Okay, so let's go back a few years. We had Covid. We had the policy response to that. We then had transitory inflation which became not transitory inflation. We had the reverse policy response which was to aggressively hike rates. The, the, the most aggressive tightening cycle in, in 40 years. Right. So people were used to seeing rates, you know, bumping up against zero. I think at one point the 10 year yield was, you know, somewhere in the, you know, 60, 70 basis point range at the very, very, very lows. And I think this was quite a shock to people who were just sort of used to seeing the post crisis, post crisis, sorry, quantitative easing regiment. All of a sudden you have yields moving, you know, to a two handle, three handle, four handle, and then ultimately a five handle. Something to your point. Many investors haven't seen this before. And so it was quite a shock to the system. Then we kind of hit sort of equilibrium. The economy seems to be doing all right. As we talked about, you know, people were worried about recession. It hasn't materialized yet. The Fed, you know, paused for a while, started easing. Then all of a sudden you get new policy initiatives coming in, specifically tariffs. Right. And so that caused a general rethinking of the way the economy is going to move going forward. Will inflation come back? Won't it? It's just been, you know, a lot of up and downs. And as we were talking, if you just look at the trajectory of the 10 year yield, you know, we, we just sort of do this large, you know, kind of sine wave between, you know, call it sort of high threes and high fours. And we've been doing that now for a few years. So you're just sort of stuck in the middle of, you know, kind of a four handle. But you get these ups and downs depending on what the driver is.
- [41:31]
Barry Ritholtz
And just to put some specifics on this, when, when we look at the broad economic consensus about tariffs, they're generally perceived as inflationary, sort of a giant VAT tax on consumers. I know a lot of people in the administration push back on that characterization, but if you're spending more money on tariffs, you have that much less money to spend on other things. Therefore it should hurt corporate revenues and perhaps be somewhat inflationary. Is that a fair assessment?
- [42:04]
Steve Laipley
It's hard to say. So I think, you know, I've heard both arguments. I think really what inflation is about, right. So we, whether it's tariffs or Something else. You know, people often talk about these things as well. That's a one time shock versus something that happens repeatedly over and over again. I think some of that's academic. Inflation's really, I almost think it's a mind game or an expectations game. The real I think question is does inflation, you know, a higher expectation for inflation somehow get embedded or get sort of resurfaced. Right. As a result of whatever policy initiative. And so I think what the Fed's looking at is less about specific thing and more about whether people start worrying that inflation will be at X level, like which may be above where the Fed wants it to be. To me, I think that's what they're really focused on is, you know, hey, we got things down, we're at 2.3%. And by the way, what's interesting, I actually looked at this, if you go back to, let's call it 95 to 2005, average inflation was around two and a half, not two. Right. So, so if you kind of look at a long, long time series on Bloomberg as an example, right now where we're sitting isn't too far off where we've been on a long, you know, 20 odd, 30 odd year journey. But I think what the Fed's worried about is will any particular action cause people to start worrying that inflation will be higher. And as you know, sometimes that can become sort of a self fulfilling thing. I think that's kind of the concern.
- [43:32]
Barry Ritholtz
So I'm going to play devil's advocate on every point you said and I want to hear your pushback. But before I get to that, former Vice chairman of the Fed, Roger Ferguson did this accidentally, very funny piece about the 2% target and he could not find an academic basis for that number. But he traced it back to an interview from the Australian, their central bank chief on TV in the 1980s. And he mentioned 2% as their target. That was the first mention of it. I mean it certainly was a credible target in the post financial crisis while we were trying to get up to 2%. Inflation and deflation was the fear. But once the CARES act and the new era of fiscal stimulus passed, isn't 2% kind of the wrong target? Why doesn't 2 1/2 or 3% make sense in an era of fiscal, not monetary stimulus?
- [44:35]
Steve Laipley
I'm going to, I'm going to say that is above my pay grade. But what I will say is if you look at a long, long time series, whether it's two, whether it's two and a half, I Mean, I think generally right now we're sort of in that zip code, right? So can they get it all the way down to a perfect two? I don't know. And do they want to or, you know, does. Do you risk going to one and a half? I mean, that's, that's for them to worry about. I do think that we're not too far off. If you, if you were to look at this over many, many, many years, the worry is somehow does everything that's happening right now start sending you in the other direction again, people worrying about it, does that start, you know, causing, you know, specific actions that actually lead to it. To it becoming more of a reality? I think that's what the Fed sort of focused on.
- [45:21]
Barry Ritholtz
And I think transitory has become a dirty word, but we sometimes want stuff. Right now, I can make the case that this bout of fiscally driven inflation was transitory. Transitory just took a little longer than everybody expected compared to the sort of deep structural inflation we saw in the 1970s. This wasn't structural. We passed a giant, everybody stay home. Here's $2 trillion. Takes a little while for the pig to work its way through the Python. Yeah, right.
- [45:56]
Steve Laipley
That's interesting. I mean, yeah, you had a huge, huge fiscal impulse, you know, very, very significant fiscal impulse. And sure, it could take time for that to work through. If you couple that with the idea that you unleash that fiscal impulse at a time when policy was still easy, the textbooks would tell you that you probably should expect some inflation. But I think, you know, if you look at just the way people had sort of entrenched their thinking post crisis, they were caught off guard.
- [46:22]
Barry Ritholtz
When, when you were at Wharton, did you have Jeremy Siegel as a professor?
- [46:26]
Steve Laipley
I did not. I did sit. I was a little bit. I was a little bit disgruntled about that. Didn't work. Didn't work out. Scheduling. I did sit on, in on some of his lectures, just as a guest, so in the back row.
- [46:36]
Barry Ritholtz
But yeah, I had him in here. I don't know, two months after the first Cares act was, was passed. And he was the first person I recall saying, hey, this is economics 101, $2 trillion, the largest fiscal stimulus as a percentage of GDP since World War II. We're gonna see a giant bout of inflation, maybe even double digits. And I got emails. We love Jeremy. You've had him on the past, but he's crazy. We're not gonna get anywhere near 9, 10%. He doesn't know what he's talking about. And it was kind of shocking to hear someone stocks, for the long run, talk about inflation and bond yields. And he turned out to be pretty dead on.
- [47:19]
Steve Laipley
Yeah. Again, if you just sort of go back and you look at a large fiscal impulse coupled with easy monetary policy, that's right out of the textbooks.
- [47:29]
Barry Ritholtz
And yet it was so hard. Another failure of imagination was so hard to say, no, no, we've had inflation 2% for 20, 25 years. What are you talking, 8, 9, 10%? It just, it just seemed that regime change was so hard to incorporate because it just seemed like such a break from everything we've experienced before.
- [47:52]
Steve Laipley
And it happened quickly.
- [47:54]
Barry Ritholtz
Very, very, very quickly. So, so, so let's talk a little bit about the next easing cycle. I'm assuming that six months from now, by the time we get into the fall, the worst of the tariff is behind us, things will have stabilized at that point. Is the Fed starting to think, all right, we can unfreeze the housing market a little bit and talk about a few more rate cuts this year or next, like, what sort of timing should we be thinking about?
- [48:25]
Steve Laipley
That's what the market. I looked at this, this morning. The market's pricing in a couple cuts by the end of the year, pricing in a couple cuts next year. And so it looks to me the market sort of settled on this idea that maybe wind up with a terminal rate of around, you know, three and a quarter, three and a half, somewhere in that zip code. So we'll see. I mean, the cut definitely got pushed out to September, right? I think originally, you know, if you go back even, you know, a few weeks ago, we were still thinking sort of, you know, mid to late summer, but that's, that's now pushed into September for sure. So, so we'll see.
- [48:59]
Barry Ritholtz
So the big question is everybody's been expecting cuts for so long and has been so wrong. Is there anything in the data that you look at that suggests maybe we're going to get it right this time in terms of the Wall street consensus as to when the timing of rate cuts might be?
- [49:17]
Steve Laipley
Well, you, you just said it. Consensus has a funny way of maybe not actually materializing. So I think everybody's sort of locked in on this, on this path now. It looks like just the way the curve is shaped and everything else. Well, we will see. The data has come in. You know, it depends. You can find, you can find people who have raised growth concerns, but then you can also find the resiliency crowd. There's, there's just a lot of, I think, sort of mixed data right now. But overall, you know, the economy seems to be holding in pretty well so far, pretty resilient.
- [49:49]
Barry Ritholtz
You know, one of the things I always look at are spreads and they seem to be relatively low. For all the people running around with their hair on fire.
- [49:58]
Steve Laipley
They are.
- [49:59]
Barry Ritholtz
What does that tell us of the state of the economy and, and the state of the fixed income markets?
- [50:06]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, I think if whether you're looking at investment grade spreads or high yield spreads, right. The spreads to Treasuries, they're both pretty tight relative to historical, long term historical averages. So yeah, the credit markets are telling you that so far, far they are buying the resiliency story. They think that, you know, balance sheets are still in pretty good shape. I mean, you've heard this anecdote before that when yields were low, corporations did do, you know, very thoughtful issuance and they were able to lock in yields and really, you know, shore up their balance sheets and have these strong cash flow profiles. Now ultimately people will have to refinance and you know, that may be at higher yield, so we'll see how long that holds. But so far spreads are telling you that the resiliency story is intact.
- [50:51]
Barry Ritholtz
So corporate debt issuers refinance that at lower rates. Households did it, everybody did it except Uncle Sam. We'll save that for another time. But if you're a buyer of debt, how should you be thinking about duration? When do you start extending your duration, looking to lock in a little higher yield on the possibility that we see lower rates in the future?
- [51:17]
Steve Laipley
This, this is the debate. Capital the right. So I think we've been very much in the camp of, you know, the intermediate part of the curve is pretty attractive. So, you know, if you're looking in five to seven, three to seven, somewhere in that zip code, you know, whether it's in Treasuries or high grade or even high yields in that area. Anyway, that's the maturity profile. But if you look at that versus say 30 years, I think that, you know, right now a lot of debate going on on the fiscal situation. Moody's action sort of resurfaced that debate. If you look at term premium meaning, and you know, again, let's define terms, the amount that investors want for holding very long term bonds has gone up quite a lot over the last several months. And I think all of this is sort of playing into this idea that yeah, longer term yields are flirting with 5%. Could they go higher? They might. There's a lot of ambiguity around what our fiscal trajectory is. Are we at risk for further deterioration. We are running deficits with a growing economy and that is, you know, and we're running larger ones than we historically have with a, with a growing economy. So that's what's caused this fear of the long end now our longer term bonds to be avoided completely. I think there's healthy debate on that. I do think that they still hold some shock absorber value depending on the situation. So you know, we like, we kind of frame this as being positioned, you know, overweight in sort of this, this belly of the curve because we think that's a sweet spot. It doesn't mean that you should have zero.
- [52:53]
Barry Ritholtz
Right.
- [52:53]
Steve Laipley
Long term bonds, you know, it could be having some might be a good sort of, you know, insurance policy in a way.
- [52:59]
Barry Ritholtz
So when, when yield comes down, bond values go up and vice versa. If you're making a bet, what's the next 200 basis points in yield? Is it more likely to go higher or more likely to go lower? It would take a pretty big screw up to send yields up 200 basis points. Not a zero possibility. But is that kind of the core bet we're more likely to see move down than up?
- [53:26]
Steve Laipley
I think the current view is that long term yields could edge higher on this.
- [53:32]
Barry Ritholtz
Edge higher, edge higher, like 25, 50 basis points.
- [53:35]
Steve Laipley
That's been discussed because of this idea that depending, okay, depending on how the tax and spending bills come out and how people score that and what's that going to look like for the deficit, et cetera, et cetera, you know, the discussion could be could you see further pressure on the very, very long end? The intermediate part is probably okay. So the real debate is are we going to see more of a steepening depending on the outcome of the, you know, tax and spending bills, et cetera, et cetera. That's been the debate. Now if you get an unexpected slowdown, you could see long term yields come down temporarily. And so to your point, you know, do you get 200 basis points up or do you get 50 to 100 down? It all depends on, you know, the unexpected. By definition, if you get a sharp slowdown that nobody saw coming, you probably do see longer term yields coming down. And I think not a lot of people are expecting that at all.
- [54:27]
Barry Ritholtz
Well, except everybody for the past five years predicting recessions that never showed up. The other question that I always like to ask is, hey, what happens if we yields don't go appreciably higher or lower? Can we just be stuck in a four and a quarter to four and three quarter you know, money market yields plus or minus around 4.5%. What does that look like? Can we just stay in that range for three, four, five years?
- [54:54]
Steve Laipley
Sure. Are you likely to? Probably not. History would tell us that except for you had this long period that doesn't look really like anything that we had the 2010, totally unique. So unless we go back to the 2010s, probably not, but. But I think, you know, my earlier point, it's going to be really hard to call. Like this is the best yield that I want to get into. It's more about we're going to have ups, we're going to have downs, we'll have cycles. It's really about building that portfolio out for the, for the long term and getting income. So it's the first time in 20 odd years the income is back in fixed income. So that's pretty compelling.
- [55:31]
Barry Ritholtz
So if someone's fixed income investor or looking to add fixed income as a sort of shock absorber to their equity portfolios, what segments of the fixed income market do you find attractive? Where are the opportunities? Today?
- [55:47]
Steve Laipley
We've been seeing flows mostly go into very high quality. So that being treasuries, that being investment grade, that's where you know, the bulk of flows have been moving into. And again, much of it has been in that sort of belly of the curve type of exposure. Now mathematically as a shock absorber, you're going to get your biggest kick from the very long end of the curve. We just talked about that.
- [56:09]
Barry Ritholtz
Right.
- [56:09]
Steve Laipley
You're taking some risk there. So because if it goes the other way, it goes the other way, it hurts. And so the debate's going to be, you know, will it play that role if you get a big slowdown? Right. If you get a huge risk off, will you see long, long term yields rally like they have in the past in light of some of the fiscal concerns? That's the big, big debate.
- [56:29]
Barry Ritholtz
And the dollar concerns on top of it.
- [56:30]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, that's the debate.
- [56:32]
Barry Ritholtz
And what about, you know, we always have clients who are looking into their retirement. You know, I just want X dollars and not worry about taxes. If you're in a high tax state, how are you looking at the muni markets these days?
- [56:47]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, and I think munis have, have really, you know, seen some whipsaw as well. Right. So a lot of folks now look at, look at munis and see some opportunities there. Again, this discussion around tax policy has really, really sort of caused a lot of volatility. At some point you just have to really make an allocation decision. And if you're, if you are, you know, in a high tax bracket, I mean, munis can be pretty compelling and they've cheapened up a fair amount the.
- [57:15]
Bloomberg Reporter
Data that matters for your investments.
- [57:18]
Barry Ritholtz
The entire auto sector is higher today.
- [57:20]
Bloomberg Reporter
And analysis on the companies making breaking news on Wall Street.
- [57:23]
Steve Laipley
Tesla's been a stock that's been in focus.
- [57:25]
Shares have really been all over the map this morning.
- [57:27]
Bloomberg Reporter
Listen to the Stock Movers Report from Bloomberg.
- [57:30]
Bloomberg Event Announcer
Let's talk about some other decliners.
- [57:32]
Bloomberg Reporter
Get your short audio report on the day's winners and losers in the stock market. Second biggest driver in terms of points for the S&P 500. Subscribe to the Stock Movers report on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen.
- [57:45]
Bloomberg Event Announcer
Join us in Atlanta or via livestream on Aug. 12 for Bloomberg's Business Value of AI event and networking reception. This event will gather business and technology executives to share their experiences and provide insight into how to best use data to optimize the customer experience. You'll also learn how companies have successfully implemented AI agents that have led to improved productivity and profitability. This program is proudly sponsored by IBM. Register@BloombergLive.com AI Atlanta all right, so I.
- [58:16]
Barry Ritholtz
Only have you for a limited amount of time. Let's jump to my favorite questions that I ask all of my guests, starting with what's keeping you entertained these days? What are you watching or listening to?
- [58:29]
Steve Laipley
Well, so the funny part about this is so Masters in business, big fan. We already talked about that. But no, I also whenever someone says.
- [58:39]
Barry Ritholtz
That, I always feel like Rodney Dangerfield and Caddyshack.
- [58:42]
Steve Laipley
Keep it fair. Keep it fair. No, I right now, you know, streaming wise, my wife makes this joke. So she and my, my older sons, you know, we'll watch Yellowstone or something like that. I've always got my laptop, right. And so she's like, you don't really watch TV with us. You pretend to. But I think one of the fun things I'm watching, you know, Friends and Neighbors right now, so.
- [59:05]
Barry Ritholtz
Interesting.
- [59:05]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, it's fun.
- [59:06]
Barry Ritholtz
Are you, are you caught up?
- [59:08]
Steve Laipley
Not caught up. Not caught up.
- [59:09]
Barry Ritholtz
So the. Yeah, well, whatever. The last episode was five really fun twist, no spoilers. No spoilers, absolutely. But not unexpected. But the way they execute it was really well done.
- [59:23]
Steve Laipley
All right, cool. That'll be some good. And I am still very fond of binge watching Law and Order. I will try purposely to hold out because I do like binge watching all of the above. Right. So whether it's organized crime or what have you.
- [59:37]
Barry Ritholtz
So my wife makes 8 o' clock, the screens go away, you can watch TV. You have to put that away. So that means right before I go to bed, last couple of minutes, let me just.
- [59:48]
Steve Laipley
We try to impose that rule, it kind of falls apart.
- [59:51]
Barry Ritholtz
No, no. She's a strict, stern taskmaster. She who must be obeyed. All right, so let's talk about. You mentioned one of your mentors. Tell us about the folks who helped shape your career.
- [60:02]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, and many of them are folks who've moved on. But I think there are certain people that I remember, you know, who really gave good advice. And, you know, I'll give you a couple of examples. I had a boss, one of my first ones, out of. Out of. Out of business school. And he basically said, look, I view my job as teaching you. I want you to listen and learn. And then if you work hard, I view my other job is to help you create financial security for yourself and your family. But you have to do those things in order for that to happen. So if you listen and you work hard, I'll try to keep up my side of it as well. And that always struck me, and I thought that was a great way to put it. You know, he viewed his job as teaching, but also if I did the right things to help me in the long term. And so I thought that was really interesting. Another mentor, you know, told me that you can be really good at what you do, but you really have to get along with people. You really have to be able to know where somebody else is coming from, work well with people, because you can be great at what you do. But if you're not pleasant to work with, it's not going to get you too far at all. And so I think that's. That's another lesson. I mean, you know, a lot of times you like to think you're right in a certain debate or whatever, but you really do have to learn to bridge those gaps or it doesn't even matter how good you are, what you do.
- [61:27]
Barry Ritholtz
Huh. Good. Good advice for anyone listening. Let's talk about books. What are some of your favorites? What are you reading currently?
- [61:33]
Steve Laipley
Well, reading how to Think Like a Monk.
- [61:37]
Barry Ritholtz
I saw that. I buy on Amazon.
- [61:40]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, no, it's pretty cool. I had a friend of mine, I'm not sure why he recommended that book to me. There might be a hidden message in there, but I think that's pretty cool.
- [61:48]
Barry Ritholtz
Don't read too much into it.
- [61:49]
Steve Laipley
One of my, you know, I like history books. And so, you know, I've read a lot of the Ken Burns stuff. I think in particular, the things I've been fascinated with, the 60s, I think really helped shape the world that we're living in, for sure. So I've been a junkie of a lot of that stuff.
- [62:04]
Barry Ritholtz
Name some authors and books.
- [62:06]
Steve Laipley
Oh, no, Ken. The Ken Burns stuff.
- [62:07]
Barry Ritholtz
All of his.
- [62:07]
Steve Laipley
Ken Burns, Yeah. I really like that. So. But, but I'll watch any number of documentaries. I just think that really was a pivotal time for the country and the world and it kind of has echoes and, you know, really long shadows. So I always thought that was, that was really interesting. I like a book that really kind of stuck with me over the years. It was about, you know, I love math, statistics, all that stuff. It was a book called against the Gods and it was the Story of Risk.
- [62:34]
Barry Ritholtz
Peter Bernstein.
- [62:35]
Steve Laipley
Yeah.
- [62:35]
Barry Ritholtz
Oh my God.
- [62:35]
Steve Laipley
Still one of my favorites.
- [62:36]
Barry Ritholtz
One of the all time great finance books that Most people absolutely 100% should be reading. No, no doubt about that. So I always pick out a handful of books to read over the summer. I'm so happy sitting on the beach, waves crashing in the background, banging through book after book. What just came a couple of days ago was Ron Chernow's Mark Twain.
- [63:03]
Steve Laipley
Oh, wow.
- [63:04]
Barry Ritholtz
And you know, Chernow did Hamilton. He did a bunch of giant books. I'm super excited about that. So I'll let you know if that's interesting. I can't imagine it's not, given both the author and the subject matter. All right, our final two questions. What sort of advice would you give to a recent college grad interested in a career in either investing or specifically fixed income and ETFs?
- [63:28]
Steve Laipley
Yeah, I think the most important thing is you have to be honest with yourself about what you like to do. And so I've met students who say they want to get into the markets. And you know, when you ask why that is, they have trouble articulating why. So I think part of it is you just really got to want to do this because if it's going to be your life's pursuit, you gotta wake up on good days and bad days and still want to do it right. And there are good days and there are very bad days and you still have to have that same sort of love of it. And so if you don't love it, right? If it's not, if you're just saying, well, you know, I heard it's a profitable thing, I want to, you know, I have these certain personal goals, that's, that's not a good reason to do it. But if you really do Love the idea of markets and just this, you know, really elegant thing where somebody, you know, two people on the opposite sides of the planet can somehow find a common price. You know, what's the saying? A trade is an agreement on price, a disagreement on value. I always thought that was the coolest thing, right. So, you know, just this idea that, you know, the markets find a way. I think if you love that, then it's the right career for you. But that's the key thing. Find what you love and be really, really honest with yourself. And, you know, it's fair to say I don't know yet. And that's why you have to feel around a little bit, you know, whether you're, you're trying different things. You know, you may land on one desk and hate it, rotate to another one and love it. It's, it's, it's a process, but you got to really be honest with yourself.
- [64:54]
Barry Ritholtz
Really, really interesting. And our final question. What do you know about the world of fixed income ETFs and investing today? You wish you knew back in the 1990s when you were first getting started.
- [65:06]
Steve Laipley
Yeah. I'm going to admit this to you. I know many of your, your admonishments about investing. I was, I was an original sinner.
- [65:16]
Barry Ritholtz
Many of them, no one bigger than me. I learned the hard way.
- [65:20]
Steve Laipley
So I did in fact do a lot of the common mistakes. You know, I chased things. I remember, you know, during the original Internet boom, buying some really expensive, racy mutual funds which I subsequently rode into the ditch. So I think part of it is, you know, the long term idea, you know, really, really taking like that long term view. Now I did learn not to panic over the years. Right. And not, you know, sort of useful.
- [65:49]
Barry Ritholtz
Skill set if you're running a trillion dollars.
- [65:51]
Steve Laipley
I think try to, try to, you know, keep your money, you know, don't pay away too much of fees and definitely don't chase the hot, hot thing. I think being diversified, you look, it may not be fun to talk about with your friends, but having a broad diversified portfolio, over time you're going to be fine. It's hair raising sometimes, but you're going to be fine over the long term.
- [66:11]
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah. Very often the cocktail chatter, it's not what makes you money. I love the title of Ned Davis's first book, do you want to be right or do you want to make money? And that really sums it up.
- [66:22]
Steve Laipley
Yep.
- [66:23]
Barry Ritholtz
Well, Steve, this has been really fascinating. Thank you for being so generous with your time. We have been speaking with Steve Laipley Global Co head of Bond ETFs at BlackRock. If you enjoy this conversation, well, check out any of the 530 we've done over the past 11 years. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, Bloomberg, wherever you find your favorite podcasts. And be sure and check out my new book, how not to Invest the Ideas, Numbers and Behaviors that Destroy wealth and how to Avoid Them. I would be remiss if I did not thank the crack team that helps put these conversations together each week. John Wasserman is my audio engineer. Anna Luke is my producer. Sean Russo is my researcher. Sage Bauman is the head of Podcasts at Bloomberg. I'm Barry Rutoltz. You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.
- [67:41]
Bloomberg Reporter
The data that matters for your investments.
- [67:44]
Barry Ritholtz
The entire auto sector is higher today.
- [67:46]
Bloomberg Reporter
And analysis on the companies making news on Wall Street.
- [67:49]
Steve Laipley
Tesla's been a stock that's been in focus.
- [67:51]
Shares have really been all over the map this morning.
- [67:53]
Bloomberg Reporter
Listen to the Stock Movers Report from Bloomberg.
- [67:56]
Bloomberg Event Announcer
Let's talk about some other decliners.
- [67:58]
Bloomberg Reporter
It's your short audio report on the day's winners and losers in the stock market, second biggest driver in terms of points for the S&P 500. Subscribe to the Stock Movers Report on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen.
- [68:11]
Barry Ritholtz
This is an I Heart podcast.