Loading summary
Transcript192 lines
- [00:01]
IBM AI Business Representative
The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works. At IBM, we've seen this firsthand. But by embedding AI across hr, IT and procurement processes, we've reduced costs by millions, slash repetitive tasks, and freed thousands of hours for strategic work. Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's Create Smarter Business.
- [00:29]
Cincinnati Insurance / Chase / Bloomberg Announcer
IBM Small businesses are the pulse of every community. They bring people together, create opportunities, and drive growth. Chase for Business helps business owners like you with personalized guidance and convenient digital tools all in one place. With that guidance and your determination, you can take your business farther and help build a brighter future for your community. Learn more@chase.com business chase for business make more of what's yours the Chase Mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply JP Morgan Chase Bank NA Member FDIC Copyright 2026 JPMorgan Chase Co. Travel smarter, not
- [01:09]
Sonesta Travel Inn Announcer
Harder at America's Best Value Inn by Sonesta with convenient locations from coast to coast and value packed comfort at every turn, it's a practical choice for road trips, quick getaways and everyday travel that keeps things simple without sacrificing comfort. And when you're a Sonesta Travel Pass member, staying at America's Best Value Inn means earning points toward free nights, upgrades and more. Every time you stay, go to sonesta.com to book your stay and unlock the best rates with Sonesta Travel Pass here today, Rome tomorrow. Join now@sonesta.com terms and conditions apply.
- [01:44]
Cincinnati Insurance / Chase / Bloomberg Announcer
Bloomberg Audio Studios Podcasts Radio News
- [01:51]
IBM AI Business Representative
this
- [01:52]
Cincinnati Insurance / Chase / Bloomberg Announcer
is Masters in Business with Barry Ritholtz on Bloomberg Radio.
- [01:57]
Barry Ritholtz
This week on the podcast I have yet another extra special guest, Miller Value Funds Bill Miller the Fourth. He is the son of Bill Miller iii, fascinating investor, portfolio manager and World Series of Poker player. They have a very unique approach to value. It's not your traditional just buy them cheap. I thought this conversation was fascinating and I think you will also. With no further ado, my conversation with Miller Value Funds.
- [02:30]
Bill Miller IV
Bill Miller, thanks for having me. It's great to be here.
- [02:32]
Barry Ritholtz
So I want to talk about your investment philosophy, what you're doing at Miller Value today. But let's roll back a little bit beforehand. You get a degree in economics from Tufts and then an MBA from Dartmouth Tufts School of Business. Was investing the original career plan?
- [02:51]
Bill Miller IV
No, it wasn't the original career plan. You know, when I was growing up, went to a small private boys school in Baltimore Maryland never really knew what I wanted to be when I grew up, but when I pointed out to my parents, they said, well, just consider school as your job, and the harder you study, the more options you'll have down the line, and it'll help you figure it out.
- [03:13]
Barry Ritholtz
That sounds like pretty good advice.
- [03:15]
Bill Miller IV
I followed it did well academically in school. So when I went to Tufts, I think the primary concern was somewhere where I could actually play baseball. So growing up as a huge Orioles fan, that was something that my dad and I often did together. He was my coach in Little League, something I'm doing now today for my son. Sports teach you a lot about being on a team, about how to operate, how to internalize what you can and control what you can and not focus on the rest. So learned a lot from that.
- [03:45]
Barry Ritholtz
Did you play baseball in college?
- [03:46]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah, but I wasn't very good, so I learned that pretty quickly I played.
- [03:51]
Barry Ritholtz
The difference between the guys who are good and really good is so tiny. Just like a little wood on the bat once or twice more a week. And you're in a different tier.
- [04:02]
Bill Miller IV
Exactly right.
- [04:03]
Barry Ritholtz
It's fascinating.
- [04:04]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah. And, you know, I probably deluded myself for a while about how good I could be, but I also probably didn't focus on the right things. And knowing what I know now about how to get better and improve at things, I could have been much more systematic about it than I was.
- [04:16]
Barry Ritholtz
Huh. So you start your career at McKenzie. Why? Consulting. What. What led to that?
- [04:24]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah, well, so I interned for my dad's group in college. Loved it, learned a lot. But then, you know, on campus, Gruden came along, and McKinsey was one of the names. And I just applied to it, did a little work on it, and made it through that interview process, which was pretty rigorous. And I got an offer from McKinsey, and I said, hey, Dad, I love being with your group. Investing's a lot of fun. You know, what would you do if you were me? And he said, well, you can always tell McKinsey. You can always come back and work for me, but if you tell McKinsey no, you'll never have a chance to work there again.
- [04:59]
Barry Ritholtz
Right.
- [05:00]
Bill Miller IV
So it was this concept of optionality again. And also there was. He knew. And I didn't know at the time, but they place an immense amount of focus on professional development. And so that was a really valuable place to spend the first three years of my career. So I was working on a huge variety of consulting projects. Mainly, actually, the job I had there. Now, I don't I don't know if it exists because of AI. So what I was doing was remotely supporting teams on research efforts and deep dives on stuff which now you just ask ChatGPT about it and he probably does a better job summarizing everything I could possibly do and assuming it's accurate,
- [05:34]
Barry Ritholtz
which is always a little bit of an F. Right.
- [05:36]
Bill Miller IV
That is a big if for sure. Yeah. Focusing on primary sources is a still a critical skill that I think a lot of people under emphasize.
- [05:42]
Barry Ritholtz
What do you take from your years consulting that showed up and as helpful as an investor?
- [05:52]
Bill Miller IV
You know, one of the things, this might surprise you less so about the data driven nature, because my dad's a data driven thinker and thinking quantitatively has always been in my wheelhouse. But the thing that I learned at McKinsey more than anywhere else would be the focus on client service and how to interact with people, how to do the subtle things that show, you know, somebody else is the client. In finance, you know, when you're managing money, it's very hard to differentiate yourself and that, you know, Ken French, who was a professor of mine at Dartmouth,
- [06:21]
Barry Ritholtz
famous fama French factor model at Dartmouth.
- [06:24]
Bill Miller IV
Sure, you got it. Exactly. One of the things he imparted on us was how long does it take to know if a money manager is actually any good? And the answer is from a statistically significant basis, longer than any money manager's career.
- [06:35]
Barry Ritholtz
Right. I was going to say 10 years, 20 years.
- [06:37]
Bill Miller IV
It's 20 plus to see if it's statistically significant. Right. So you have to be doing other things. It's like we were talking about before we came in here. Content's a big focus. Right. That's a way to differentiate yourself. The way you communicate with clients, getting back to them quickly, all of these things are really important. And I learned those at McKinsey, and I'm not sure I would learn those to the same extent if I had just directly joined my dad's firm. So that might be a surprising answer, but it is a no.
- [07:00]
Barry Ritholtz
It's really, really interesting. So McKinsey was a solid place to get grounded. What led to the pivot to investing? Late 07.
- [07:10]
Bill Miller IV
Oh, wait, yeah. So in McKinsey, we were effectively handing over analyses to clients and then leaving and moving on to the next analysis. And it occurred to me that if you actually wanted to, you know, build any equity in your analysis and what you're doing, you had to actually take a real stake in something. And so that made me think, okay, you know, this is. It'd be a great time to pivot from what I was doing at McKinsey to my dad's side of things, where that's exactly what you're doing all day, every day. Excuse me. And then I also, during college, I took a liking to poker and so played a lot of no limit Hold. And back then, Poker Stars was kind of an illegal gray area. And so I, I played a lot online, and I saw a lot of similarities between what my dad did poker Analytical Edge in terms of thinking quantitatively at McKinsey, and it all kind of came around to moving in that direction.
- [08:03]
Barry Ritholtz
So speaking of your father, how did growing up in the Bill Miller household influence how you look at risk and reward, at investing? How big of an influence was he on your initial philosophy?
- [08:20]
Bill Miller IV
I think he's most of it. It's hard for me to specifically say A, B and C because it was as much learning from watching him and how he operated. So, number one, he was always, always had a stack of research and was always going through content, always looking for new perspectives. He's a relentless truth seeker. And I think that's ultimately what we're doing as investors, is trying to separate where the truth is from where the perception is around what's going to happen. And the bigger the gap, the more you want to place a bet.
- [08:50]
Barry Ritholtz
That variant perception is really important. Is it?
- [08:52]
Bill Miller IV
Exactly.
- [08:53]
Barry Ritholtz
Especially when that gap gets bigger and bigger.
- [08:55]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah. And especially if there's a, you know, a margin of safety there to protect you on the downside. So relentless truth seeking. And the other thing is, you know, there were no shortcuts for him. There's no, there's no substitute for actually putting in the time to going through that content all the time and being in front of your machine all day. And just time is the ultimate resource and constraint for everyone. And so thinking in blocks of time and thinking how to maximize your productivity per unit of time, I think is something that I took away from him.
- [09:30]
Barry Ritholtz
Really interesting. So going back to the family business, that's a pretty loaded concept for a lot of people. What was it like first going back to work with your father and then becoming the controlling owner of Miller Value Partners?
- [09:47]
Bill Miller IV
It was fantastic because we were a small group at leg for a good period of time, probably from 2013 or 2014 until we split off and went independent in, I think it was 2019 or so. So got to work with my dad very closely a lot. But at the same time, one of the things I love about it is the market doesn't really care what he did or didn't do. And ultimately, now that I'm in charge of the portfolios, it'll hinge upon my decision making more so than what he did. And so it's on me to now take everything I've learned and run with it and do what we can do.
- [10:26]
Barry Ritholtz
Was your father a poker player? How did you find your way into that?
- [10:30]
Bill Miller IV
No, he wasn't a poker player. It was when Chris Moneymaker won the World Series. I don't know if you remember.
- [10:35]
Barry Ritholtz
Sure.
- [10:36]
Bill Miller IV
I think it was maybe 02 or 03.
- [10:38]
Barry Ritholtz
Big, funny glasses.
- [10:39]
Bill Miller IV
And he was an accountant, actually. And so, you know, he stressed a lot of quantitative decision making. And the other thing I actually looked at coming out of Tuck was baseball operations stuff because Moneyball was a. You know, the whole analytical side was just coming around then. And, you know, I know you like to talk about mistakes, but I think of specifically that recruiting process, my attitude towards it, and just some mistakes I made there, so.
- [11:09]
Barry Ritholtz
Well, we seem to learn more from our failures than we do from our successes because we don't know if our successes were the result of good fortune or skill. If it takes 20 years to figure out which it is, you're going to obviously learn more from the eras. Hey, we know this was a bad choice.
- [11:26]
Bill Miller IV
That's right.
- [11:26]
Barry Ritholtz
Or was it a good choice with a bad outcome?
- [11:29]
Bill Miller IV
Well, I think in this case it was a. You know, the outcome was good because it was ultimately where I was probably looking to wind up. But at that time, I was thinking, I want to do baseball. Baseball, baseball. You know, I mentioned earlier I wasn't good enough to play. Play. I wanted to sort of use my analytical talents to talents, my analytical background in training to go into the analytical side. And as I went through the recruiting process, it became very clear that I was jumping through hoops waiting for callbacks. And it was a very intense process. And I realized that I was probably going to be charting pitches in Topeka at the end of it, which to me didn't seem all that exciting. But in retrospect, if you want to be in baseball operations, you should do anything you possibly can to get your foot in the door to these competitive businesses.
- [12:11]
Barry Ritholtz
But let me point out, a little over a decade ago, a kid became an intern in the NFL and he just won the super bowl as head coach. So if you really love it that much and you're that committed, I'm with you. I can't count pitches in Topeka. I just couldn't imagine that. Right. I mean, yeah, especially because, you have how many other people were interns and they didn't head coach the super bowl winner.
- [12:36]
Bill Miller IV
But it's funny because now I see that on the other side, right? So I get linkedins and messages all the time. Hey, I'm a really good software analyst. I want to come and work for you and be a software analyst. I'm like, we don't need a software analyst right now. We need somebody that can go get me a sandwich at lunchtime, you know, but like, so. But I understand the perspective too. It's just that I think if you want to become a member of a team, you have to understand what the team needs and where you can genuinely help. And it may not always necessarily align with what you want to do. And I think that's important to keep in mind.
- [13:08]
Barry Ritholtz
Really, really very interesting. So as long as we're talking about all these career choices, if you were starting out today, would you follow this, a similar path to what you did previously or would you go a different route?
- [13:26]
Bill Miller IV
I really like what I'm doing now and I want to do it indefinitely. So it's hard for me to go back and say I would do something differently because I'm where I want to be. And for the long term, I do think one of the lesser considered paths that a lot of undergrads don't think about would be actually going into something entrepreneurial. And I don't mean like starting a startup that you're trying to scale from zero to gajillion dollars over the next year. Right. But that's what people tend to think of because that's where all the returns look like they are in reality, I think potentially scaling a small services business, you know, whether that's power washing, home cleaning, just things that, where you can get your arm around the fundamental service and scale that and make it bigger is potentially a more a safer, risk adjusted way to a big outcome than people consider.
- [14:15]
Barry Ritholtz
Just because you're learning a business from the ground up and customer relations and all those other things.
- [14:20]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah, well, you know, even in our business, it takes time to build a track record, it takes time to build the assets. And so anything you do where you're going to have a good outcome in the long run just takes repetitive effort and the right focus. And so sometimes the learning around something that you can get your arms around can be easier than the learning around software development or, you know, scaling a big fund or things like that.
- [14:45]
Barry Ritholtz
So really, really interesting. Coming up, we continue our conversation with Bill Miller, the fourth Miller Value Fund's chief investment officer talking about his investment philosophy. I'm Barry Ritholtz. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Rad.
- [15:12]
IBM AI Business Representative
So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need. Now a Global workforce of 300,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions. Resolving 94% of common questions, not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business IBM if you
- [15:42]
Cincinnati Insurance / Chase / Bloomberg Announcer
follow markets, you know the value of long term thinking. You plan, you diversify, you prepare for volatility. But even the best strategies can't prevent every bad day. For more than 75 years, Cincinnati Insurance has helped individuals and businesses navigate tough moments for with expertise, personal attention and independent agents who focus on relationships, not transactions, the Cincinnati Insurance companies let them make your bad day better. Find an agent@cin fin.com this podcast is
- [16:18]
Wise / iShares / 4imprint Advertiser
brought to you by Wise, the app for international people using money around the globe. When it comes to sending money abroad, many providers claim to offer free fees and competitive rates. But don't be fooled. This can be code for inflated exchange rates. With the Wise account, you can send, spend and receive money in over 40 currencies without ever having to worry about hidden fees sending pounds across the pond. Most transfers arrive in 20 seconds or less. Spending reals in Rio. The Wise Travel Card gives you the mid market rate on every purchase. No costly markups on your bill. Getting paid in dollars for your side gig. Avoid hidden fees and get the real exchange rate every time. With 24. 7 access to live support, your international transactions with Wise are quick, transparent and safe. Plus, WISE runs over 7 million daily checks to catch and prevent fraud. 15 million people already trust WISE to manage their money internationally. Be Smart, Get Wise. Download the Wise app today or visit wise.com Terms and Conditions apply.
- [17:21]
Barry Ritholtz
I'm Barry Ritholtz. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra special guest today is Bill Miller. He is the Chief Investment Officer and Portfolio Manager of Miller Value Fund where he works with his famous father, Bill Miller the Third. So let's talk about your investment philosophy separate from your dad's. Starting with how do you define value? In a world where a lot of the traditional metrics like price to earnings or price to book seem to have been downgraded somewhat, perhaps they don't fully capture modern Intellectual property based business models. How do you think about those?
- [18:07]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah, I think you have to have a flexible definition of value and that if it's just based on accounting figures, you're probably not going to do very well over the long run. Because if you look at some of the best performing asset stocks of all time, they never look cheap just because they have such a right tail and they compound with very, you know, they're investing all their earnings and they're constantly seeking to grow that edge. And so solely focusing on accounting factors is not a great way to capture long term value or out performers. Although it can be. You know, we have a strategy whereby my business partner Dan Lysik has his collection of 10 or 12 names that look insanely cheap on these metrics. So you can do. There's a lot of different ways to skin the cat.
- [18:46]
Barry Ritholtz
Right, so what, what are the different thought process around defining value? So cheap but not broken is obviously what your partner is focusing on. How do you contextualize things like Amazon or Nvidia or Google, which have looked expensive for 10 years and have just shot the lights out?
- [19:10]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah, well in the case of Amazon they started with a very small idea around just selling books online and it was, you know, it ended up being this retail juggernaut just because if you look at now the distribution logistics networks that they've used to fulfill their orders, it's just a, it's a network that can't be touched. Right. It's the everything store. And it depends on the actual scenario. So you know, one of the things that I've been vocal about now for probably 10 years is our def, our view that Bitcoin is still a massively undervalued technology. And so that would be one where you probably say, well, why? It has no cash flows, it's speculative, it's based upon other people's beliefs. And I'd say that's exactly right. It is based upon other people's beliefs. But other people don't haven't yet come around to the view that it is a functionally superior technology to gold. It's a form of capital governance. I think it requires a lot of different lenses. When we say we have a flexible definition of value, you have to approach things from a variety of different perspectives. In this case, one of the reasons I think bitcoin is so interesting and compelling. Seventeen years in, it's gone from this weird technology on the Internet that only criminals used to. Now it's collateral for loans in our modern day financial system. What explains that well, markets explain it to an extent in that people are increasingly coming around to view it as an interesting place to put money in. An interesting capital governance system. It's totally separate from the fiat systems that everyone has known for their entire lifetimes and multiple centuries before us. It wasn't possible prior to 2009 or 2010 when the White paper came out. And so now you've got this new emerging system of capital governance that I think it's one of the most dynamic areas of finance in general, as a matter of fact. So it's an area I'm very optimistic about over the long term. It'll bounce around, it'll be volatile, but I think it's headed to much bigger places.
- [21:06]
Barry Ritholtz
So. So we're recording this the day after it briefly broke 60,000. Are you a buyer of Bitcoin at these prices?
- [21:15]
Bill Miller IV
Yes. So that's a big part of my personal financial situation. And one of our MVPA, it's roughly. Or digital assets collectively are about 10% of that fund.
- [21:26]
Barry Ritholtz
So we'll talk more about state of markets in a little bit. Let. Let's stay with the concept of philosophically, this is an interesting technology. I've described this as stop thinking as a unique asset class. I think of it as, hey, it's somewhere between Facebook and Google, between meta and Alphabet as a technology company, which gives it a little more perspective. But at the same time, it came out around the same time as an iPhone. And I would never give up my iPhone. I don't know how I would. My train tickets, my plane tickets, my communication, my portfolio. Everything I do, I do on this. If Bitcoin were to disappear tomorrow, it wouldn't affect my life in the least. Why is it that 17 years in, we're still waiting for this to gain broad usefulness? I'm still waiting for smart tickets that cut out StubHub and those guys and all sorts of techno technological uses that I heard about five, ten years ago, but still haven't happened. What's the response to the skeptics?
- [22:36]
Bill Miller IV
Well, so if you look at the introduction of running water in households, it took 100 years for it to go from possibility to ubiquitous. Okay. And that was a clearly better technology than using an outhouse or boiling water to put it on Unite or whatever.
- [22:52]
Barry Ritholtz
So
- [22:54]
Bill Miller IV
this is an entirely new idea. And again, from my perspective, it's a capital denominator. It's not a numerator. It's a capital denominator. So bitcoin is a denominator for capital. And the reason I think it's so superior to what we've known before is that money, the way it works right now, it's ultimately backed by the threat
- [23:12]
Barry Ritholtz
of state ordered violence, standing, standing army and a set of laws, right?
- [23:18]
Bill Miller IV
That's right. You know, you don't pay your taxes, we'll throw you in a box and lock the key away. Throw the key away. But this, and if you think about actually around the world, the countries you want to visit, most of them are going to have stability of process and rule of law. Right. And the places where that's not the case, there's a much less distinct, much less of distinction between who controls the ledger and who controls the guns. So the farther apart those two things are, the better. So in this case, we now have a distinct ledger entirely apart from any state. And its units can't be controlled by anyone. Right. In that they're controlled by actual energy. So you need to have energy to crank out a new bitcoin because that's what the whole mining process is about, Right. You verify a transaction, takes a lot of energy to do that. And in exchange for expending that energy, you get more Bitcoin. That's the minor reward.
- [24:12]
Barry Ritholtz
Right?
- [24:13]
Bill Miller IV
Right. So this is a capital denominator whereby energy input is actually required to create new units. What happens now? What happens now is somebody, you know, a bunch of Congress people sign something, Fed goes and prints money to keep roughly rates roughly in line, prices roughly stable, employment roughly full. And so there's still some issues with that from a process perspective. Right. So they're trying to control the money supply to come, engineer outcomes as opposed to having a fair set of value that we all agree upon. Right. This is a valuable thing because it takes energy to produce and having that be the arbiter of value. And so if you look at the political process today, it's a process issue more than anything else in that oftentimes the least accountable party ends up winning an office because of all the promises they make. And what happens then? Well, more units get printed. Right. And they just get printed and printed over time. And that's what ultimately causes inflation. And it's, you know, it's not a redder issue or blue issue. Most of the time Republicans are cutting taxes in a way that probably doesn't make sense from a systemic perspective. At the other side of the equation, oftentimes the blue side of the aisle increases entitlements. Right. Without an offset. And so both of those are bad things for the overall medium through which we transact over time. And so now you've got a system that offers a promise of effectively cutting that whole the clown show, as I call it sometimes out entirely. So you look like you're not believing it.
- [25:52]
Barry Ritholtz
Well, you know, I don't care about deficits. Since past 50 years, I've been hearing about the problem with printing money and everything that we were warned against didn't happen. The dollar hasn't devalued. We haven't had hyperinflation. We haven't crowded out private capital. And you could still lend money to Uncle Sam at historically low rates if you want 3.54% as a yield. So all the warnings about printing money and deficits have been, you know, the boy who cried wolf for half a century. So there's that and then there's. Okay, so here's an idea that we're gonna. What are we limited to? 24 million, 21. 21 million coins. And that scarcity creates value. I understand it's virtual. I understand the advantages of having things be purely digital from conception forward. I have a hard time getting past the criminality and the pig butchering and the blackmail. That. That's a little problematic. And it's sort of like democracy all the others. You know, it's the worst system, except all the others. Well, a central bank and a government that makes sure we're doing something within reason is better than just opening it up to the Wild west, which is what this seems to have been for a long time. The US Was pretty aggressive in embracing it, especially this administration. And it seems to have speculatively run up in anticipation from that. And, you know, once it was all in the price, you know, we got cut in half. It's when you're talking about stability. Yeah. The US dollar was down 9% in 2025, not cut in half. This is a giant whack in, you know, less than six months. So I have a hard time just wrapping my head around, oh, the source of stability is something with no fundamental value but swinging wildly up and down. So I'm not as negative about it as a lot of people are. I was really negative about the NFTs, which, wait, you want to take something with literally no value and totally reproducible. And like, I understood the idea of, hey, you're gonna buy a $10,000 Birkin bag, and here's a unique identifier on the blockchain. All right, that made some sense, but not $68 million. This sort of crazy prices these traded at. So there seems to be a lot of speculative excess that get in the way of the, the technological story underneath.
- [28:49]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah. And I think you bring up a good point with regard to the United States and the deficits not making a big impact. And that's because we are the best house in a bad neighborhood. From a fiat perspective, I mean, we have the, the reason that America is the most desired place to be. From an immigration perspective, I think we have, you know, four times multiples the number of immigrants as the next four closest countries combined. Again, that comes down to stability of process, rule of law, and property rights.
- [29:15]
Barry Ritholtz
Right.
- [29:15]
Bill Miller IV
And so if there's now a form of currency that wasn't possible 20 years ago, call it, that has more stability of process and more certainty around property rights over the long term. I think it's an education issue as much as anything else.
- [29:32]
Barry Ritholtz
Interesting.
- [29:32]
Bill Miller IV
And people may not come around to that view, but from my perspective, the quantitative inevitability of the technology is pretty compelling when you look at just the bitcoin versus Gold. Gold's done amazing in the past year. I get it, it's a part of the debasement trade. Bitcoin hasn't. But when you think about if gold is the predominant check and balance on fiat, Fiat's lack of accountability, and then you look at the functional attributes of bitcoin, it's so far superior to gold.
- [30:03]
Barry Ritholtz
So you joined legg Mason in 08, pretty much right in the middle of the financial crisis. How did that experience shape your perspective on investing and in particular on value?
- [30:17]
Bill Miller IV
Wow. Start with a hard hitting question here. So that was a. As you point out, I joined right at the top. I think when I joined Capital Management, there were roughly 150 people working there. And then by the time, you know, Capital Management merged with Clearbridge, there was a substantially fewer number of people working there just because assets flew out the door, performance struggled, and, you know, that can be a pretty ugly compounding effect on an asset manager.
- [30:49]
Barry Ritholtz
So for sure, by the way, that story was pretty much ubiquitous throughout finance.
- [30:56]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah. And so I think that taught me, you know, you, to run one of these businesses, you obviously want to have some extra gas in the tank, you know, at all times. You want to, you don't want to run it too thin from an operating capital perspective if you want to build it for the long term. And so it's a good idea to keep those fixed costs lower than you might even anticipate.
- [31:21]
Barry Ritholtz
So let's talk about building on that. You come out of the financial crisis, you get your CFA soon after 2011, something like that.
- [31:30]
Bill Miller IV
It Sounds right.
- [31:30]
Barry Ritholtz
And then become a chartered market technician in 2018. Unusual combination. Tell us why you went that route.
- [31:40]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah. So the analogy I make is if the CFA teaches you to play your cards on the poker table, CMT teaches you to play the other players at the poker table. And in that, one of the interesting things about the CMT is, number one, it takes a lot less time than the cfa. But number two, I use that in some of the teachings from that more often now than I use the cfa.
- [32:02]
Barry Ritholtz
It's funny, the way you described it, I always thought the difference was financial analysts tell you what to buy, technicians tell you when to buy.
- [32:13]
Bill Miller IV
Well, I think that's accurate as well. Yeah. And so one of the things that it's very easy to do as a value investor, to see multiples coming down and a stock going down, you go, wow, this is way too cheap. The reality is that it could just keep going down because it's going down and people are selling it. You have to be able to read that on the chart and when the volumes change and when the investor behavior changes. So it teaches you to look at investor behavior. It teaches you how to figure out what other investors are thinking based upon price trends and action and volume. That's been a really valuable skill set and compliment to the cfa.
- [32:48]
Barry Ritholtz
So walk us through your process. From idea deal generation to execution and position sizing, what sort of steps do you have to work your way through?
- [32:58]
Bill Miller IV
Well, I think a lot of it starts with the appreciation that most assets are efficiently priced, Right. So we have a portfolio of things that we believe are undervalued. And so all day, every day, we're constantly running through screens, we're reading research, we're looking at price movements, we're looking at insider action. A lot of the time when insiders are buying or selling to potentially point something out to us. But then we have to. Then once we identify something that looks interesting, it has to then be better than what else we have in the portfolio. So we have a group of things that we own and like. But at the same time, we're constantly comparing new ideas to see if it can be a fit coming to the portfolio. And so how we make changes is going to be obviously directly relevant to that thesis. In some cases, we'll have a name that the investment thesis completely changed with the latest earnings report or something went out the window. And then we'll have an ability to either add something new or bump something up. But it's always about constantly looking for new ideas that could be undervalued. And then trying to figure out the right way to weight them. Because as unconstrained investors, all of our torque is in our position sizing in the weights. So, you know, we made a lot of mistakes and oftentimes the answer to those mistakes is sitting right in our portfolio. You know, it almost always is. We should own more of that and less of that. And so I spend a lot of time just going through the portfolio and figuring out where the relative weights should be. But I would say at a high level. Probabilistic, fundamental value.
- [34:31]
Barry Ritholtz
Probabilistic, fundamental value. All right, I like that phrase. When you're looking at fundamental values, how do you distinguish between something that's only temporarily out of favor, Temporarily hated to. Oh, this business model is structurally broken. How do you avoid the classic value traps?
- [34:50]
Bill Miller IV
Well, we don't always, unfortunately, you know, and just because something is undervalued doesn't mean that other people are going to agree that it's undervalued. So I think that's an important thing to keep in mind too. And it's important to use the markets to help you figure out how to change your position sizes because sometimes you start legging into something and it just keeps going down. You should probably heed the market's feedback a lot of the time relative to your own positions and their sizes. So one of the key reports that my dad looked at every day, I still look at every day, is our daily performance report. And basically it just has the entire portfolio ranked by weight and then how it's done over the past day, how each name has done over the past day, week, month, quarter, six months, year.
- [35:39]
Barry Ritholtz
What about the reverse? When something's working out, do you pyramid and add to the position as it runs?
- [35:45]
Bill Miller IV
It depends. So I mean we just, I know you don't like to talk about short term stuff and market related things, but we just eliminated our Google position a few days ago. Right.
- [35:53]
Barry Ritholtz
So we, I mean that had a great 2025.
- [35:56]
Bill Miller IV
It did. And we actually got the, I think the investment thesis right. Hopefully we got the exit right. But the thesis there was, okay, here's Google. This should be a huge AI winner. Everyone was concerned about their search business at the time and AI replacing search. And our position was. Hold on. This trades at a massive discount to the Mag 7. It trades at a discount to the market on an earnings and cash flow basis. Yet it has all the distribution mechanisms for AI. They're in 7 out of 10 phones
- [36:24]
Barry Ritholtz
globally and all the technology capability to implement AI, they're a giant tech brain trust, right?
- [36:33]
Bill Miller IV
Exactly. And they had a ton of funding to build it with and, you know, Waymo and all these other, you know, YouTube, all these other insane businesses and was trading at a discount to the market. It just didn't make any sense. So we bought that. That's probably fairly valued today, I think. You know, and obviously one of the classic mistakes is selling things too early. Could it continue to compound? Yes. But if you look at why the whole Mag 7 hyperscalers have done so well over the past two to three years, the answer has been, well, they're, number one, growing faster than everything else. And number two, they've got these huge incremental free cash flow margins. But if you look at what's been going on recently, they don't really have big incremental free cash flow margins anymore because they're dumping so much money into the AI space that there really is no free cash flow. And now you're betting on it materializing down the line. So where we take the other side on the AI situation is if you actually look at the dollars required to be found in revenues five years out, they're so substantial. Number one, they're bigger than the entire software as a service business right now, globally around the world. Okay, number one. Number two, the total revenues that are required to justify all the investment that's gone in is bigger than the combined revenue of Mag7 today. And those companies have been scaling for 30 to 40, 50 years in some cases. And so you got to find that in five years to make all this investment worth it. And if you think about the structural the way it works, it's all this capex investment upfront, and then it's very little marginal cost. Right. So you potentially have a race to the bottom on pricing on the top line in a few years as well. So that gives us a little bit of pause whether or not it's right. Who knows?
- [38:12]
Barry Ritholtz
So what I'm hearing is that there's a probabilistic quantitative discipline. You're looking at value, you're looking at growth rate, you're looking at risk combined with a qualitative judgment about management and sounds like specific industry and whether these moonshots are going to pay off or not. How do you balance between the squishy qualitative side and the more quantitative mathematical side?
- [38:40]
Bill Miller IV
Well, I think there always has to be a quantitative value perspective on anything we're buying or thinking about, often from a total addressable market perspective versus the current valuation. One of the big themes for us also is alignment. So we want to see managers, you know, actually using their cap, so it's capital allocation alignment. So are they using their capital in ways that align with our view of the stock? You know, are they buying back a lot of shares if it's mispriced? Hopefully yes. Are they aligned with you as a manager of the company? You know, principal agent conflict is one of the biggest sources of value destruction you can possibly imagine. And so that's important to us as managers. We are the biggest investors in our own funds as well, so.
- [39:26]
Wise / iShares / 4imprint Advertiser
Oh, really?
- [39:27]
Barry Ritholtz
Interesting.
- [39:27]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah. But it's, you know, it's a first principles based approach. So one of the things we pay special attention to, I think more so than most and can be opportunistic about moving on, is insider activity. So when you see a big insider buy, if you can then reverse engineer a quantitative value perspective into that insider buy, that makes a lot of sense. That can be a really compelling.
- [39:51]
Barry Ritholtz
I just saw a big Wall Street Journal piece on do insider buyers indicate future performance? And I saved it. I haven't read it yet. What's your take? I mean, the assumption is insiders. There's a million reasons to sell a stock. If you need liquidity, there's only one reason to buy a stock. You stay with that conclusion. Insider buying is indicative of positive things to come.
- [40:18]
Bill Miller IV
I think it's a potentially high signal source of information. So in the aggregate, does it necessarily guarantee it? No. But if you can contextualize and say, okay, this CEO is really smart. He's done this sort of thing in the past. He has a plan for this company, here's what it's looking like, and he just puts it a huge amount of personal capital in. That can be a really good.
- [40:42]
Barry Ritholtz
So it's not binary. There are other factors that have to be. It's a little more nuanced than the way we typically think of it.
- [40:48]
Bill Miller IV
Context matters.
- [40:49]
Barry Ritholtz
Always really interesting. Coming up, we continue our conversation with Bill Miller, the fourth chief investment officer at Miller Value Fund, talking about today's market environment. I'm Barry Ritholtz. You're listening to Masters of Business on Bloomberg Radio.
- [41:16]
IBM AI Business Representative
The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works. At IBM, we've seen this firsthand. But by embedding AI across hr, IT and procurement processes, we've reduced costs by millions, slash repetitive tasks and freed thousands of hours for strategic work. Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's Create smarter business IBM if you
- [41:46]
Cincinnati Insurance / Chase / Bloomberg Announcer
follow markets, you know the value of long term thinking. You plan, you diversify, you prepare for volatility. But even the best strategies can't prevent every bad day. For more than 75 years, Cincinnati Insurance has helped individuals and businesses navigate tough moments. With expertise, personal attention and independent agents who focus on relationships, not transactions, the Cincinnati Insurance companies let them make your bad day better. Find an agent@cinfin.com this podcast is brought
- [42:22]
Wise / iShares / 4imprint Advertiser
to you by Wise, the app for international people using money around the globe. When it comes to sending money abroad, many providers claim to offer free fees and competitive rates. But don't be fooled, this can be code for inflated exchange rates. With the WISE account, you can send, spend and receive money in over 40 currencies without ever having to worry about hidden fees sending pounds across the pond. Most transfers arrive in 20 seconds or less. Spending reals in Rio. The wise travel card gives you the mid market rate on every purchase. No costly markups on your bill. Getting paid in dollars for your side gig. Avoid hidden fees and get the real exchange rate every time. With 24. 7 access to live support, your international transactions with WISE are quick, transparent and safe. Plus wise runs over 7 million daily checks to catch and prevent fraud. 15 million people already trust wise to manage their money internationally. Be Smart, Get Wise. Download the Wise app today or visit wise.com Terms and Conditions apply.
- [43:24]
Barry Ritholtz
I'm Barry Ritholtz. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio or watching us on YouTube television. I'm speaking with Bill Miller the Fourth. He's Miller Value Funds chief Investment officer and Portfolio manager. He he works with his father Bill Miller the Third, the famous value investor. So, so let's talk about what's going on in the current environment. If you look at today's markets, where do you see things that are very much mispriced either by asset class, sector, geography factor, whatever, what's out there that's not fully priced or what's out there that's overpriced.
- [44:06]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah, I think aspects of the current environment remind us of 1999, right? So you've had a narrative driven performance led by AI. You have a very narrow market for the most part with MAG7 leading huge returns to momentum, the momentum factor last year. But then if you look at the actual macroeconomic backdrop, you're seeing deregulation, you are seeing weaker dollar and you're seeing economic acceleration potentially in the us. And so when you think about all those things combined and you look at what happened between call it 1999, 2000 all the way until 0607. You had the market go effectively nowhere for seven years. It went down and bounced around because I think valuation heading into that period was very high. But what did really well during that period actually small mid cap value. If you look at the relative valuation discrepancies today between smid value and large growth, they're right at the same sort of extremes that occurred in 1999. And so you have same valuation extremes, you have compelling valuations in a lot of the small cap mid cap value space and you have an economic acceleration backdrop. So that means that a lot of more cyclically oriented things, value oriented names that care more about what's going on in the economy, there's a much lower hurdle rate for those guys to exceed the expectations embedded in the valuations right over the next five to seven years than there are in the massive AI space.
- [45:49]
Barry Ritholtz
So let's talk a little bit about small and mid cap value. Last year we only saw two, that's 2025. We only saw two of the seven MAG7 outperform the S&P 500, which tends to suggest, hey, maybe this is broadening out. We're going to see more mid caps and more small caps. The value skeptics are going to say, hey, we've had so many false starts in value, it's been 15 years of growth winning. How do you respond to that?
- [46:19]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah, I think that those snapbacks can be violent. Right. We actually had one of our research providers recently calls mid cap value a quote unquote inferior asset class. I mean that sounds like capitulation to me. There's a lot of under loved stuff out there that's really interesting. So energy sectors, energy is interesting to me right now. You know, if you look at its weight in the market, it's 3 or 4%. But if you look at its free cash flow contribution over the next year to the market, it's going to be 10 to 12% most likely.
- [46:48]
Barry Ritholtz
What's that historic relationship look like?
- [46:51]
Bill Miller IV
I don't know if it's that large to be honest. That gap energy's under love. It's underperformed for so long. It's not the best industry from a capital allocation alignment perspective, but it's gotten a lot better over the past few years. I think you could see those types of stocks do really well. You know, sadly, I do think it's a really cheap call option on global strife right now. Energy prices, you know, they're pretty bouncing pretty close to the marginal Cost of
- [47:17]
Barry Ritholtz
production, which is shocking when you think about Russia and Ukraine and Gaza and Israel and what's going on in Venezuela and who knows what's going to happen by the time this comes out, we can own Greenland. So given, given all of that, what does it mean to see, despite all this geopolitical turmoil, energy prices are almost reasonable?
- [47:45]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah, they are. They've started to turn up and energy's done well over the past few weeks. It could continue to do really well. So that's why we're overweight energy.
- [47:54]
Barry Ritholtz
What other sectors do you like?
- [47:57]
Bill Miller IV
Financials. We're still overweight. I think you're going to continue to see curves steepening and that should be a decent earnings growth in those. I think utilities are finally attractively valued again at 10 to 13 times earnings in a lot of cases with very clear growth pathways and I'd say little risk. We don't have enough energy in the country and utilities are pretty attractive here,
- [48:21]
Barry Ritholtz
especially as AI and data centers continue to come online. You take very concentrated position, at least compared to traditional value managers. How do you. What's the framework for thinking about this? How do you position size? These. Is this just strictly a function of, hey, we're not closet indexers. We have a high active share and when we have high conviction, we really, we go all in. To follow the poker analogy.
- [48:50]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah, that's a good way of putting it. I mean, if you consider that most stocks underperform the index for their lifetime in it, it's an interesting exercise to come at it from the entire other side and just say, okay, what are the 10 to 15 names that you think have the highest probability of actually outperforming instead of effectively? What most active managers do is they have these risk constraints and they can only overweight certain sectors a little bit or so. The closer you are to the benchmark, the more likely you are to underperform it. Right. Because you're just layering higher fees on something that looks more like the benchmark. So we're very comfortable taking bets entirely outside of the index, with the obvious caveat that there are going to be periods when we're going to underperform meaningfully just because we're taking entirely different risks. And there'll be some periods where we outperform by a lot. So I think that's really the only
- [49:48]
Barry Ritholtz
way to do it is to not be a closet indexer, essentially.
- [49:53]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah. And you have to match the investment process to your ip. So for us thinking that the edge is on the 37th page of the Excel spreadsheet is just not realistic. Right. Or if you're Fidelity and you got a guy that's been following a certain industry for a long period of time and really understands the nuances of every single company and what could change? You know, that might make sense, but it just depends on what you're trying to do. And you have to match up those two things.
- [50:18]
Barry Ritholtz
So we've been kind of dancing around AI throughout this conversation, so let's talk about that a little bit. Are you thinking of AI as its own investment entity? Are you thinking of it as disrupting traditional business models? Are you thinking of other businesses? Forget the Max 7, the, the Mag 493 as being the beneficiaries of AI to be more productive, efficient, profitable. How are you thinking about AI as an investor?
- [50:48]
Bill Miller IV
I think it's all of those things. Yeah, it's all those things. I use it all day, every day.
- [50:56]
Barry Ritholtz
That was really my next question. How do you use AI throughout the day for your process, both for selecting investments and just managing a large investment firm?
- [51:09]
Bill Miller IV
Well, it's an enormous time saver, and it's not necessarily always a time saver on the investment front, although it often is. It can just be a time saver personally. Like if you have an interpersonal issue that is weighing on you, sometimes you throw it into AI and you get a better answer than you could have gotten from asking your three closest friends and move on. So if you're thinking in units of time, it's a huge time saver. For me personally, I think a lot of life is about asking the right questions and you got a pretty good set of answers there or method for answering questions. You pointed out earlier, it can be wrong often and you have to consider that, but it's got a lot of good perspectives in there that can bring to bear on a lot of different things.
- [51:46]
Barry Ritholtz
So what, what tools do you use? What, what's your favorite AI?
- [51:50]
Bill Miller IV
At the moment? We, we have Chat, GPT and Gemini Going for Business. Both for business. And then we're also adding Claude here soon.
- [51:58]
Barry Ritholtz
I just, I just put Claude on a couple of desktops and a laptop. And the coding side of it is really fascinating. And I, I can see why people are concerned that this could replace certain, at least menial kind of work. Grinding work like, oh, it does this so much faster and better than I could ever grind down on my own. Yeah, Claude's kind, especially Claude Pro. It's really kind of impressive. And the question is, is 200amonth a lot? Is that not A lot. Is that a fair price? I, I think it, it sounds like a lot of money compared to what is perplexity, 20 bucks a month, that seems like free practically for that much power. So you're using it everywhere. Yeah. What are you hearing from your peers? Is this the sort of thing that everybody has gone all in on? Is the fear, hey, if we don't do this, our competitors are so we better step up.
- [52:58]
Bill Miller IV
I don't know if it's fear just as much as ability to cover so much more ground in the same amount of time or less. You know, it's just a super powerful technology and we use it a lot.
- [53:11]
Barry Ritholtz
Really, really interesting. So I wanted to get to this question and I forgot about it. So we're talking about the current environment. AI is obviously a game changer, but we've gone through a few decades of major regime changes. We had the era of monetary policy, and then starting in 2020, we've had the era of fiscal policy. When you're looking at central banks and the government higher for longer zero interest rates, all these different things, how do these geopolitical variables affect how you think about putting capital to work, how you think about risk?
- [53:55]
Bill Miller IV
Well, I think one really big picture change sort of going back over the past decade to today is coming out of the financial crisis. Capital effectively had no cost. I mean, you saw the insane amount of money, money printing that occurred, but that's because that was to offset a huge hole in capex that had gone into housing that wasn't necessarily needed. Right. And we had to work that out from a demand, supply, demand perspective. And we've now done that. But if you go back and read what the Fed said, there was a study that came out of, I think the San Francisco Fed where they used computers to look at the language that was used in meetings. Right. About how to set rates. And what they found was that the 2% inflation number, that's kind of the bogey, was supposed to be a symmetrical goal. It wasn't symmetrical at all. The way they were setting rates between 2010, roughly, and call it 2020 or so. And so that has an enormous implication, I think, for the way all kinds of different assets perform. And I think that's why massive growth had the run it did over the past decade. Right. Because when capital has no cost, you're willing to look out a huge distance,
- [55:05]
Barry Ritholtz
embrace more risk, because what are you going to get? 1.5%, 2%? It doesn't make sense otherwise.
- [55:10]
Bill Miller IV
Exactly. That's why huge growth had the run it did because capital had no opportunity cost. Now, if you look at where we are with mortgages at 6% and capital actually has a cost again, it has major implications for the kinds of assets that are likely to do well in the future. It comes back to the whole theme we talked about earlier around smid value, more capital intensive things potentially having a better decade. Now that capital has a cost again.
- [55:36]
Barry Ritholtz
Let me share a favorite factoid with you. Former Fed Vice chair Roger Ferguson wrote a white paper on the origination of the 2% target. And he traced it back to some random television interview in the 1980s in New Zealand where someone threw out 2% and that was it. It just magically stuck. And you could find that, you can find that paper online. It's pretty hilarious. It's just such a random number that doesn't like, it's not. There's no underlying thesis for why it's two and not three or one. It's just, it just seems like. Yeah, that sounds about right.
- [56:20]
Bill Miller IV
Well, I think it's got to actually be higher than that if you think about it, because certainly in an era
- [56:25]
Barry Ritholtz
of fiscal rather than monetary stimulus. Right. You're going to just inherently have higher prices.
- [56:30]
Bill Miller IV
Right. Well, I mean, if you think about the fact that most consumers overwhelming saving vehicle is their home. Okay. What's the blended rate on mortgages right now out there? That's just in the system. Yeah.
- [56:45]
Barry Ritholtz
Well, half, half the individually owned homes, there are no mortgages. And the remaining half, it's a crazy set of numbers of two and a half, three, three and a half, four. Just everybody was smart locked in a fixed rate before the pandemic.
- [56:59]
Bill Miller IV
Well, so if house prices in the aggregate don't appreciate by more than that interest rate. Right. People are going broke in their primary savings vehicle. So housing actually does need to increase in value over a long period of time or people slowly go broke.
- [57:14]
Barry Ritholtz
Makes a lot of sense.
- [57:15]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah. So I think the 2% is, I know, is thrown out there, but I think it actually has to be higher over the long term to kind of make the math work for most people.
- [57:23]
Barry Ritholtz
I couldn't agree more. All right, I only have you for a limited amount of time. Let's jump to our favorite questions, some of which I know the answers to, starting with who are your mentors who helped shape your career?
- [57:39]
Bill Miller IV
Wow. So Mr. Kini was my dad's original business partner. He's a fascinating human. Worked until the day he died. 92.
- [57:49]
Barry Ritholtz
Wow.
- [57:50]
Bill Miller IV
An incredibly nice human being. I don't think ever said a bad word about anyone. One of the things that was so interesting to me about Mr. Kinney is he didn't start his career at Legg Mason in research until he was 50.
- [58:03]
Barry Ritholtz
Wow.
- [58:03]
Bill Miller IV
So, you know, a lot of people, young people, think, oh, here I am. I'm locked in this career. There's always time to switch. And then he hopped over at 50 to start this role where he had a prolific career and influenced a lot of people and did that for 40 something years.
- [58:18]
Barry Ritholtz
Wow.
- [58:19]
Bill Miller IV
So he was a very smart guy. Generous to a fault. One of my favorite stories about him, him and my dad were heading out for lunch one day, downtown Baltimore, and, you know, some. A homeless person comes up and says, starts with the story, I haven't eaten in this many days, and blah, blah, blah. And Mr. Keane sits there listening to it and gets out his wallet and he gives her, you know, I think it was like a $50 bill, certainly inflation adjusted. And he says, oh, ma', am, here, just go get yourself some hot soup. Take care of yourself. And she looks at it, she looks back at him, she looks at it, she goes, to hell with soup. I'm going to get me some whiskey. But, yeah. So he was an incredibly generous human being, contributed a lot to animal welfare stuff. I'm a big believer in animal welfare causes, so he was an influence on me. I can also think of a handful of times just from business school that not necessarily an individual mentor, but just one liners from business school that I remember over the years. So that line I gave you earlier about Ken French and how long it takes for a manager to prove whether or not his work is statistically valuable or not. The other one liner, he told us, is never pay a load for a mutual fund. He said, if there's one thing you take away from my class is never pay a load on an investment fund. And that's certainly still true today.
- [59:36]
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, absolutely. Let's talk about books. What are some of your favorites? What are you reading right now?
- [59:42]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah, right now I'm reading a book called the Mattering Instinct by. I think it's Rebecca Goldstein, but it's a fascinating book on mattering. The Mattering Instinct. And it's about people's desire to matter and what that means. So there's a lot of psychology in it. There's a lot of philosophy in it. The basic premise is that we're all just trying to overcome entropy. So the tendency for disorder and systems to increase and we're all going to die eventually.
- [60:10]
Barry Ritholtz
I was going to say it's a losing battle but while we're here.
- [60:13]
Bill Miller IV
Exactly. Let's do something interesting. Right. So that's what I'm reading now. I just read prior to this. Let them. The Mel Robbins book. So it's one of the. I think it's the best selling book last year.
- [60:26]
Barry Ritholtz
Right.
- [60:27]
Bill Miller IV
I can sum that one up pretty succinctly and it's focus on what you can control and don't let anything else get to you.
- [60:35]
Barry Ritholtz
Sounds like good advice.
- [60:35]
Bill Miller IV
It's good advice. And I mentioned that to my dad because he sees me reading it and he's like, did you ever read Marcus Aurelius Meditations? This is not a new idea.
- [60:44]
Barry Ritholtz
Stoicism created the idea of controlling what's within your control. 3,000, 2,000 years ago.
- [60:49]
Bill Miller IV
Exactly. And I have read that and that's a phenomenal book as well. It's just good to have more modern stories that you can relate to.
- [60:57]
Barry Ritholtz
What's keeping you entertained these days? What are you streaming? Either podcasts or, or, you know, Netflix or whatever.
- [61:03]
Bill Miller IV
That's one of my things I don't really do is Net. Is Netflix.
- [61:07]
Barry Ritholtz
No Netflix.
- [61:08]
Sonesta Travel Inn Announcer
No.
- [61:08]
Bill Miller IV
I'll watch competitive events. I'll watch sports. I'll watch, you know, an occasional stand up comedy show, but I don't watch the series.
- [61:14]
Barry Ritholtz
Did you see the Australian Open this year?
- [61:16]
Bill Miller IV
I did. I watched some of that. It was pretty awesome.
- [61:18]
Barry Ritholtz
I have the finals dvr. I haven't, I haven't watched it yet, but I know you're a tennis guy.
- [61:24]
Bill Miller IV
Yep.
- [61:26]
Barry Ritholtz
It's rare to find someone who can take Djokovic and put him back on his heels.
- [61:31]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah, well, the Djokovic center match match was pretty awesome.
- [61:34]
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah. Yeah, I, I save these. I watch them like months later when I get around to it.
- [61:39]
Bill Miller IV
Yeah, I do. I do golf. So that's, that's something I've just started taking. I'm terrible. You know, I'm an 18 handicap, high variance 18 though, so I can have some pretty good days. But it's interesting because there's a similarity to investing in golf, which is golf. You get better at golf by narrowing your misses. And I think that's also true with investing. You start narrowing the misses. It's a way to get better.
- [62:00]
Barry Ritholtz
Charlie Ellis made the same argument with tennis. Most tennis players lose because they make all these unforced errors. Other than the pros, most of us would be better off being less bad rather than. Than trying to be more good, if that makes any sense.
- [62:16]
Bill Miller IV
Absolutely. You can shave a lot of strokes doing that.
- [62:19]
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah. Yeah. Final two questions. What sort of advice would you give to a recent college grad interested in a career in either investing or value? Or what have you
- [62:31]
Bill Miller IV
choose? Your dad.
- [62:32]
Barry Ritholtz
Well, that certainly helps. I love what your father said to you in terms of create future optionality by studying and doing well in school. I've never quite heard it phrased that way, but that really sums up. Why do I have to study algebra? Because you're just creating optionality.
- [62:54]
Bill Miller IV
Investing is about optionality and creating more options for yourself down the road. And so anytime you can invest in yourself and create additional options is a good thing to do.
- [63:05]
Barry Ritholtz
Yeah, to say the very least. And our final question. What do you know about the world of investing valuations, portfolio management today that would have been useful when you were first getting started 20 years ago or so?
- [63:21]
Bill Miller IV
Well, you know, we were talking about books earlier. I personally think that the best book on personal finance is the Psychology of Money by Morgan Houselike. If you haven't read that, anyone that gets a bank account should be required to read that and just internalize the concepts. I know if you've been in the industry a while, not all of it's new, but a lot of it's a really good reminder on how you should behave to create wealth over the long term for yourself.
- [63:48]
Barry Ritholtz
Absolutely. Bill, thank you for coming in and for being so generous with your time. We have been speaking with Bill Miller the fourth. He is the Chief Investment Officer and Portfolio Manager at Miller Value Fund. If you enjoy this conversation, well, check out any of the 600 we've done over the past 12 years. You can find those wherever you find your favorite podcasts, iTunes, Spotify, Bloomberg, YouTube. I would be remiss if I didn't thank the crack team that helps put these conversations together each week. I'm Barry Ritholtz. You've been listening listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.
- [64:50]
Cincinnati Insurance / Chase / Bloomberg Announcer
If you follow markets, you know the value of long term thinking. You plan, you diversify, you prepare for volatility. But in life, even the best strategies can't prevent every bad day a fire, a loss, a disruption that demands immediate attention. When that happens, what matters isn't just what you planned. It's who shows up. That's where Cincinnati Insurance comes in. For more than 75 years, they've helped individuals and businesses navigate life's toughest moments with care, expertise and personal attention. Together with independent agents, Cincinnati Insurance focuses on relationships, not transactions. Their approach is grounded in experience, follow through and trust built over time. Bad days happen, and when they do, you deserve an insurance partner who understands risk, respects what you've built and is ready to help you move forward. The Cincinnati insurance companies Let them make your bad day better. Find an independent agent@cin fin.com.
- [65:55]
Wise / iShares / 4imprint Advertiser
With volley from iShares, you get access to both monthly income and growth potential in one simple ETF.
- [66:01]
Bill Miller IV
It's the best of both worlds.
- [66:03]
Wise / iShares / 4imprint Advertiser
Discover Bali iShares Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF iShares the market is yours. Visit www.ishares.com to view perspectives for investment objectives, risks, fees, expenses and other information that you should read and consider carefully before investing. Risks include principal loss and the use of derivatives, which could risks and volatility. Monthly income is not guaranteed. Prepared by BlackRock Investments, LLC.
- [66:21]
Sonesta Travel Inn Announcer
Deadlines shift, plans change and sometimes you just need promo products fast. Turn to 4imprint 4imprint has hundreds of promotional items available with 24 hour turnaround from custom apparel and drinkware to trade show gear, writing tools and more. And their 360 degree guarantee promises your logo will be printed with care, your order ships fast and it'll show up right and on time. That's the certainty of 4imprint. Check out the full 24 hour selection at 4imprint.com 4imprint4 certain.