Stock Market Stories via the Narrative Machine

Summary

Masters in Business: "Stock Market Stories via the Narrative Machine"

Host: Barry Ritholtz (Bloomberg)
Guest: Ben Hunt (Perseant)
Date: December 17, 2025

---

Episode Overview

This episode delves deep into the concept of "The Narrative Machine"—how stories and narratives are crafted, spread, and used to shape market behavior, investor sentiment, and even broad economic and political outcomes. Barry Ritholtz interviews Ben Hunt, founder of Perseant, whose work specializes in linguistic pattern recognition and narrative analysis. They explore who truly shapes the market discourse ("missionaries"), how stories are weaponized, why investors are drawn in, and how one can avoid being unduly influenced by prevailing narratives.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

The Weaponization and Evolution of Narratives

[03:02]

• Narratives have always been "weaponized," especially by effective politicians to answer the question "why?"—why vote for someone or favor a policy.
• What changed post-Global Financial Crisis (GFC) is everyone now tries to shape stories: CEOs, central banks, and pundits all use narrative as a tool to prescribe how you should perceive their actions.
• The Fed leveraged forward guidance as narrative construction, followed by CEOs telling stories to boost stock multiples rather than focusing solely on operational metrics.

“It’s all about telling a story, today. We can call it weaponization, but to me it’s just a natural evolution of how storytelling goes.”
— Ben Hunt [03:16]

---

Dealing with Narrative Overload: Noise vs. Signal

[04:23]

• The marketplace is flooded with stories, equating to significant "noise."
• Distinction: Stories that merely describe what happened (background media noise) vs. those that are prescriptive (crafted to create specific future action or investor behavior).
• Prescriptive narratives by influential actors (Fed, CEOs, pundits) deserve special attention, as successful stories can move markets.

---

"Missionaries": The Primary Narrative Shapers

[05:33]

• “Missionaries” are influential figures who propagate and amplify narratives, analogous to preachers spreading doctrine.
• These can be central bankers, chief economists, or even influential internet personalities like Roaring Kitty.
• Historically, the US Fed Chair has been the most powerful "missionary," but power dynamics have shifted in recent years with increased fiscal dominance and the White House taking a more prominent role.

"The most impactful missionary since I’ve really been looking at this ... is the US Fed chair."
— Ben Hunt [06:56]

• Ben notes that Jerome Powell’s influence today is far less than four years ago due to the White House’s intentional shift to a more Treasury-/fiscal-dominated narrative.

---

Fiscal vs. Monetary Storylines: The Pandemic Shift

[07:50]

• Post-2020 saw a regime shift from monetary to fiscal stimulus: unprecedented government spending (CARES Acts, infrastructure, semiconductor bill) in response to the pandemic.
• This shift was driven by multiple overlapping forces: pandemic panic, partisan politics, and a quest to control the narrative on policy effectiveness.
• The neutrality ("veneer of impartiality") of the Fed allowed it to take center stage during the GFC, but heavy fiscal intervention during COVID eroded this, making narratives appear more overtly political.

"The Fed’s job was to avoid inflation and it was the fiscal side that drove the inflation, the helicopter money. But that veneer of impartiality ... was really damaged during that Biden administration, and so gave the opening for Trump to come in and say they’re all just political anyway."
— Ben Hunt [10:54]

---

Politics and Market Narratives

[11:35]

• All major market narratives and regime shifts are ultimately political at their core, even those dressed as purely economic debate.
• Partisan politics shapes not only policies but also the stories used to sell those policies.

"Everything ultimately gets cashed out in politics ... These are always at their core political arguments, political narratives."
— Ben Hunt [12:23]

---

Recursive Social Loops & the Shrinking Half-life of Stories

[13:15]

• Social media and decentralized information platforms accelerate the narrative cycle; stories now have much shorter "half-lives."
• Most narratives are quickly consumed and discarded, but those with broader resonance (longer half-lives) are more investable.
• Recursive social loops (“echo chambers”) intensify stories within specific audiences, but the stories that break out of these loops matter most for markets.

---

Narrative Machine vs. Sentiment Analysis

[14:41]

• Traditional sentiment analysis is a "very weak read" on what changes people's minds.
• Narratives are more than sentiment—they’re coordination tools. They "change your mind" through their story arc, not just by being positive or negative.
• The key measure of a narrative is whether it actually influences thought and behavior, not its factual accuracy.

“The only thing that can change your mind ... is a better story ... it has to be the truthiness. And you go, oh, that makes sense.”
— Ben Hunt [15:13]

---

Narratives as Coordination Tools

[16:06]

• A narrative (coordination tool) aims to shift collective behavior—politicians to votes, central bankers to risk-taking, companies to investor confidence.
• The intention is not accuracy or transparency, but behavior modification.

"A coordination tool simply means using your words for effect, not as an accurate description of what you actually think, but to ... change behavior. That’s what forward guidance is all about."
— Ben Hunt [16:19]

---

Avoiding Narrative Capture: Critical Distance

[17:01]

• Everyone is susceptible to compelling narratives, especially from credible storytellers.
• The key is maintaining a “critical distance”—the discipline not to immediately accept what you want to believe.
• Ben's practical suggestion: Always ask yourself “Why am I reading this now?” when encountering a powerful story.

"The crucial thing ... is just to maintain some critical distance. The words are being spoken ... to get you to change your behavior. ... The crucial thing is always, though, to step back and just ask yourself, why am I reading this now?"
— Ben Hunt [18:10]

---

Memorable Quotes

• "We can call it weaponization, but to me it’s just a natural evolution of how storytelling goes." — Ben Hunt [03:16]
• "The most impactful missionary since I’ve really been looking at this over the last 16 years is the US Fed chair." — Ben Hunt [06:56]
• "Everything ultimately gets cashed out in politics." — Ben Hunt [12:23]
• "The only thing that can change your mind ... is a better story ... it has to be the truthiness." — Ben Hunt [15:13]
• "Just do that simple step, and it will give you just a ... beat just to step back so you don’t rush headlong into believing a story because you want to believe it." — Ben Hunt [18:39]

---

Timestamps of Important Segments

• [02:09] Barry introduces Ben Hunt and narrative machine concept
• [03:02] Ben on the evolution and weaponization of narratives
• [05:33] "Missionaries" and their market-shaping role
• [06:56] Federal Reserve's dominant position as missionary and its recent decline
• [07:50] Shift from monetary to fiscal stimulus and narrative consequences
• [12:23] Politics as the root of market narratives
• [13:31] Recursive social loops and the half-life of stories
• [14:41] Narrative machine vs sentiment analysis
• [16:06] Narratives as coordination tools
• [17:28] How to avoid being captured by narratives
• [19:07] Barry’s wrap-up and summary

---

Final Thoughts

Ben Hunt and Barry Ritholtz deliver a lively and insightful discussion on how modern markets are shaped not just by data, but by powerful stories and the people who tell them. As narratives cycle ever faster and become more prevalent, critical thinking and the willingness to pause and question become vital tools for every investor.

"The narrative machine is everywhere. It is creating storylines for stocks, for asset classes, for markets, for politicians, for individual companies. It takes a little bit of common sense to step back, take a beat, give yourself a moment, ask yourself, is this a reliable storyteller?"
— Barry Ritholtz [19:07]

Transcript

[A]

I'm Hannah Fry and I'm on a mission to find out about a mysterious day called Q Day, which experts think could be the moment our most precious encrypted data is suddenly at risk. Learn more later in the podcast.

[B]

These days it seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn every field and every function. But without identity, you can't trust they'll serve your business instead of jeopardizing it. Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right by securing your AI agents identities, giving you a single lay control, a single standard of trust. So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise, with Okta you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent, secure any agent. Okta secures AI with the B2B card.

[C]

Payment landscape evolving, large corporations face pressure as buyers increasingly demand to pay invoices by virtual card. For merchant acquiring businesses like yours, this is a high growth opportunity waiting to be unlocked. With Mastercard's adaptive approach to B2B acceptance, you can enhance your infrastructure for high value payments and meet your customers unique needs. MasterCard offers solutions and support for every step of the supplier lifecycle, helping you deepen merchant relationships, start fast, grow strategically and scale at your pace. With a modular toolkit you can flexibly deploy. Discover [e-mail] commercial acceptance so have you.

[B]

Heard the story about the prescription plan? With savings automatically built in, it's where a family of any size can feel confident the cost of their medication won't hold them back. Go to CMK Co Stories to learn how CVS Caremark helps members save just by being members. That's CMK Co Stories.

[D]

Investors regularly consume all sorts of financial news, opinion commentary, but they hardly ever consider who's driving those narratives and whether they're helpful to their portfolios. I'm Barry Ritholtz and on today's edition of at the Money, we're going to discuss the narrative Machine. To help us unpack all of this and what it means for your portfolio, let's bring in Ben Hunt of Perseant. Ben's firm uses linguistic pattern recognition and media network mapping to identify narrative clusters that might create investment opportunities. So Ben, you've written about narrative constructions and everything from politics to markets, even public health. How are narratives being weaponized in everyday practice?

[E]

Narratives have always been weaponized, meaning good politicians or effective politicians have always understood the power of a good story. To answer the question, why? Why should you vote for me? Why should you favor this policy? That's what good politicians are great at. They're great at Presenting their vision of what reality is. What's changed today is that everyone is in on that act. Everyone is now trying to tell a story about how to think about their company's earnings, this central bank's monetary policies. You really saw this change with the great financial crisis and the Fed starting to use forward guidance, starting to use their words to impact markets. That's a great example of narrative construction. And then you saw so many CEOs follow suit to tell a good story to get a multiple on your stock rather than tell something about operation, leverage or anything like that. It's all about telling a story today. We can call it weaponization, but to me it's just a natural evolution of how storytelling goes.

[D]

So if everybody is a storyteller, doesn't that just create a sea of noise? How can we identify which of those stories are worth paying attention to and what's just background noise and normal media discourse?

[E]

Well, I think you can tell the difference between storytelling, that is describing what happened. That's just filling the airtime, if you will, of course, giving you a reason why stocks went up or financials went down today. I think what you want to look at though carefully is the effort that's made by Federal Reserve, by CEOs, pundits who are trying to be prescriptive. They're trying to tell you a story about what should happen in the future. It's an indication of the effort that that company, that central bank, that institution, or that investor who's talking their book, they're trying to give you an indicator, they're trying to convince you of a certain course of action in the future and you should pay attention to it. Because if it's a well told story and it gets traction, it works.

[D]

So I've heard you use the phrase missionaries to describe the small set of actors that shape narratives everybody else consumes. Who are these missionaries and where do they work? What do they do?

[E]

Well, I use the word missionary because there's a famous thought experiment around what we call the common knowledge game and around how narratives and stories spread through a crowd. And it really goes back to old fashioned missionaries who go to some, some other country, some foreign country and stand up and start preaching the word. That's what a missionary is and that's, that's what spreads the word of a story. A missionary is something who, people, someone who people are paying attention to.

[D]

So could be anyone, anyone from the chief economist at Goldman Sachs or the Federal Reserve chair to Roaring Kitty, that, that defines missionaries, that defines missionary. You got it so who are the most influential missionaries in today's markets and how has that list changed over time? I mentioned Roaring Kitty. I kind of, you know, people talk about Reddit like it's new. I kind of remember the Yahoo message boards in the 1990s. They move stocks even though it was a different era and so long ago.

[E]

They absolutely move stocks. And it's the same principle today. So I would tell you the. The most impactful missionary since I've really been looking at this over the last 16 years is the US Fed chair. That's number one. Number two, A to B are going to be other central bank heads. ECB had, BoJ head. They're, they're a distant. Number two. What, what's interesting to me about our new era of I'll call it fiscal dominance, where the role of the Federal Reserve has been diminished or subsumed to some degree, intentionally so by treasury, by the White House, is that the missionary power of Powell today is a fraction of the missionary power of Powell four years ago.

[D]

I'm so glad you said that, because ever since Keynes, we understand the playback. You have a financial crisis or recession, the federal government stimulates with fiscal stimulus. That really did not happen to any substantial degree following the financial crisis. How much did the sort of abdication of fiscal authority by Congress allow the Federal Reserve chairperson to become missionary number one?

[E]

That was an enormous part of it. It was also desired by the White House. It was absolutely desired by the White.

[D]

House because Obama White House.

[E]

By the obama White House 100% because the federal Reserve has a. Again, this is the presentation. The presentation is that they are largely an apolitical entity. So something coming from the Fed, whether it's a narrative, whether it's actual policy, doesn't get the same sort of immediate raw partisan pushback that policy from the White House, the Obama White House received. So it was entirely desired that the Fed take the lead and Bernanke Yellen, now Powell after that. They certainly rose to that challenge. What's changed today is that this White House has very intentionally tried to bring the Fed to heel. So if you're looking at who are the dominant missionaries today, I'd put Besant over Powell by a significant margin today.

[D]

So let's roll back to 2020 during the first Trump presidency and into 21 during the first year or two of the Biden presidency. That seemed to be a massive regime change where if Congress previously had sort of abdicated the fiscal stimulus that boomeranged with a Vengeance and Cares Act 1 and 2 under President then first term President Trump was the single largest fiscal stimulus, at least as a percentage of GDP, since World War II. And then Biden comes in and you have CARES Act 3 and the Infrastructure bill and the semiconductor bill. It seemed like giant regime change from monetary stimulus to fiscal stimulus. Is that simply because we had a once a century pandemic and the government was scared out of its mind, or are there other forces driving that shift, be it narrative or otherwise?

[E]

Oh, I think it's all true. You know, that's what Hemingway said about religions was that, you know, what you said, they're all true. So these things are always overdetermined. Gary. So what the mix is between response to the plague, what was driven by partisan politics, trying to stay in office, stimulus for stimulus sake, it's all of a piece. I think what's impactful here though, Barry, is that the Fed's job was to avoid inflation and it was the fiscal side that drove the inflation, the helicopter money. But that that veneer of impartiality, of apoliticalness, I think was really damaged during that Biden administration and so gave the opening for Trump to come in and say they're all just political anyway. So I want my political guys to call the shots. It's all true, Barry.

[D]

So kind of fascinating that the first year of the Biden administration and the same thing with both this Trump administration and the prior Trump administration, essentially you had pretty much single party rule. The pandemic might have been an exception because it was panic was ruling. You roll back to 09 with Obama, you had a divided government, the crisis was more or less over and you just didn't see the same level of fiscal stimulus that you saw in either 20 or 21 or arguably 2017 as well. How much does politics drive, partisan politics drive narratives and how significant is into.

[E]

The market answering the question why, why should you vote for this policy? Why should you support that policy? Those are the narratives that really drive our whole world and society. I always like to say that everything ultimately gets cashed out in politics. The market narratives at a very high level, at a tectonic, maybe a low level, at that tectonic plate level of fiscal dominance or monetary policy dominance, stimulus being, you know, the policies that are trying to reverse that, hard money policies. These are always at their core political arguments, political narratives. And they, they, they, they absolutely are, I think, ultimately responsible for the big shifts we see in markets.

[D]

Let's talk about something you've written about recursive social loops. Explain what that is and, and is the modern form of, let's call it social media or decentralized media, making those loops tighter and faster.

[E]

Without a doubt, the half life of stories is declining, which makes actually kind of better for narrative analysis because you can, if not ignore, you can safely assume that the stories of today that are very specific to today, a very specific, you know, political issue or the like, they're not going to be around the issues that stick around buried. The ones that have a longer half life, that have a more secular pattern. Right. As opposed to, oh, we've just got a recursive loop and you're just kind of done. So a recursive social loop simply means that we tend to all of these, these stories tend to get into their, I like to call them, they get auto tuned into a certain audience where your echo chamber and they just go back and forth. But in markets, the ones that are the narratives that are longer lasting and hence more investable are the ones that don't get trapped into. I mean they're obviously impacted by political auto tuning, but they go beyond that.

[D]

So you've described the narrative machine as distinct from traditional sentiment analysis. Explain the ways that that is the case.

[E]

So sentiment is I think a very weak read to try to understand what changes people's minds. And this gets back to the, the initial idea of well, how do you measure information? And a narrative is information, a story is information. The way you measure it is not by its truthfulness or its accuracy. You measure its strength by how does, does it change your mind? Does it, does it, does it make you think something differently than you thought before Sentiment, Whether you use nice words or mean words to talk about something, it never changes your mind, it never changes your mind. The only thing that can change your mind, Barry, is a better story. When somebody tells you a story, they put it in that story arc that has the truthiness doesn't have to be truth, it has to be the truthiness. And you go, oh, that makes sense.

[D]

I'm glad you used that phrase truthiness again. You, you've explained that narratives are not truth claims, but rather they're coordination tools. Give us a little more details on, on what narrative as coordination tool looks like.

[E]

Yeah, a coordination tool simply means that the speaker, the opinion giver, is trying to shape opinion and behavior to a certain outcome. That's all it means. A politician wants to shape your behavior to vote a certain way. Central bankers typically want to get you to go farther at take more risk with your portfolio than you otherwise would. A coordination tool simply means using your Words for effect, not as an accurate description of what you actually think, but to use your words to change behavior. That's what forward guidance is all about. That's what advertising is all about. It's not to share with you the actual workings, inner workings of their mind. It's to try to change your behavior. That's what a coordination tool is.

[D]

You've used the phrase captured by a prevailing market story. Some investors get captured and they get sucked into it. Some of the more common themes have been bitcoins as a inflation hedge, gold as a substitute for fiat currency. How can any investor detect when they've been either consciously or unconsciously captured by a narrative?

[E]

It's difficult. You remember the X Files.

[D]

Sure.

[E]

Where Fox Mulder was saying, you know, I want to believe. And that's true for. For all of us humans. We want to believe. And so when somebody tells us a believable story and they're a believable source, then our predilection is to say, oh, huh, that's interesting. I believe what's crucial to do, Barry. And it's so hard. I mean, I've been doing this professionally for 35 years, and I. I still get. Will get wrapped up in a story. I'll read a tweet or it'll make me really mad, or I'll read a story and go, oh, that's really interesting. I got to look up companies to invest in that theme. The crucial thing, Barry, is not to think this stuff is, oh, it's always a lie, or they're trying to fool you. It's just to maintain some critical distance. The words are being spoken to you to get you to change your behavior. They're trying to change your mind. They're trying to convince you of a story that's not bad. That's what we humans do. And it may be a story that you do end up believing. That's fine, too. The crucial thing is always, though, to step back and just ask yourself, why am I reading this now? Why is this story being presented to me now? Just do that. Just do that simple step, and it will give you just a. It'll give you a beat. It'll give you a beat just to step back so you don't rush headlong into believing a story because you want to believe it. That's all you need to do. Why am I reading this now?

[D]

To say the very least, for sure. Thank you, Ben. To wrap up, the narrative machine is everywhere. It is creating storylines for stocks, for asset classes, for markets, for politicians, for individual companies. It takes a little bit of common sense to step back, take a beat, give yourself a moment, ask yourself, is this a reliable storyteller? Do they have a good track record? Are they the sort of storyteller that is worth believing? Or perhaps they're selling something and we should be a little more circumspect before we buy. I'm Barry Ritholtz. You're listening to Bloomberg's at the Money.

[A]

Did you know Tide has been upgraded to provide an even better clean in cold water? Tide is specifically designed to fight any stain you throw at it. Even in cold butter. Yep. Chocolate ice cream. Sure thing. Barbecue sauce. Tide's got you covered. You don't need to use warm water. Additionally, Tide pods let you confidently fight tough stains with new coldzyme technology. Just remember, if it's gotta be clean, it's gotta be Tide.

[B]

These days it seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn, every field and every function. But without identity, you can't trust they'll serve your business business instead of jeopardizing it. Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right by securing your AI agents identities, giving you a single layer of control, a single standard of trust. So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise, with Okta you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent. Secure any agent. Okta secures AI.

[F]

This podcast is brought to you by FedEx. The new power move. Hey, you know those people in your office who are always pulling old school corporate power moves? Like the guy who weaponizes eye contact. He's confident, he's engaged, he's often creepy. It's an old school power move. But this alpha dog laser gaze won't keep your supply chain moving across borders. The real power move? Having a smart platform that keeps up with the changing trade landscape. That's why smart businesses partner with FedEx and use the power of digital intelligence to navigate around supply chain issues before they happen. Set your sights on something that will actually improve your business. FedEx. The new power Move.

[G]

Hey, Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. You know one of the perks about having four kids that you know about is actually getting a direct line to the big man up north. And this year he went wants you to know the best gift that you can give someone is the gift of Mint Mobile's unlimited wireless for $15 a month. Now you don't even need to wrap it. Give it a [e-mail] Switch upfront payment.

[A]

Of $45 for three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required new customer offer for first three months only. Speed slow after 35 gigabytes if network's busy, taxes and fees extra. See mintmobile.com.