
Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.) joins Meet the Press NOW after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine are questioned by Congress over the Iran war. Former FBI Director James Comey makes his first court appearance after being charged over a social media post that the Justice Department says threatened President Trump. New details emerge about the suspect in the White House Correspondents' Dinner shooting.
Loading summary
Etsy Advertiser
Who are you celebrating this Mother's Day? Shop Etsy for handmade planters for a plant mom or custom accessories for a pet mom. Celebrate all moms with unexpected Mother's Day gifts on Etsy. Shop the Etsy app.
DSW Advertiser
You know that thing where you get an amazing pair of shoes at a really great price and want to tell everyone about it?
Donald Trump
Yeah.
DSW Advertiser
So do we. Here at Designer Shoe Warehouse. We'll give you something to brag about, like the latest styles from brands you love or the trends everyone's obsessing over or shoes that make you feel like, well, you. So go ahead, show off a little. Buying shoes that get you at prices that get your budget. Head to your DSW store or dsw.com today. DSW. Let us surprise you.
Kristen Welker
Welcome to MEET THE press. Now, I'm Kristen Welker in Washington. And that was the closing bell on Wall street as markets finished the day slightly lower against the backdrop of soaring oil and gas prices from the war against Iran, as President Trump signals he will continue to blockade Iran until it agrees to give up its nuclear ambitions. Markets also closing after the Federal Reserve's decision to leave interest rates unchanged. Chairman Powell speaking to reporters this afternoon, likely for the last time as chair, was with President Trump's replacement poised to take the reins. Powell expressing concern about the administration's attacks against him and the central bank while also cautioning that the conflict in the Middle east is driving up energy prices and causing economic uncertainty.
Jerome Powell
Listen, the economic outlook remains highly uncertain and the conflict in the Middle east has added to this uncertainty. In the near term, higher energy prices will push up overall inflation. Beyond that, the scope and duration of potential effects on the economy remain unclear, as does the future course of the conflict itself.
Kristen Welker
Today, prices at the pump hitting a four year high, $4.23 a gallon on average for regular gas. US oil prices spiking as well, breaking $100 a barrel at the same time, a major international benchmark for oil, near $120 a barrel, its highest level since 2022. In a meeting yesterday, President Trump told energy executives that the US Blockade of Iranian ports will continue, quote, for months if needed. That's according to a White House official speaking to reporters today. The president doubled down on that strategy.
Donald Trump
Well, the blockade is genius, okay? The blockade has been 100% foolproof. It shows how good our Navy is, I can tell you that. Nobody's going to play games now. They have to cry uncle. That's all they have to do. Just say we give up, we give up. But their economy is really in trouble. It's a dead economy. They've come a long way. The question is whether or not they're going to go far enough. So at this moment, there will never be a deal unless they agree that there will be no nuclear weapons.
Kristen Welker
Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Pete Hagseth was on Capitol Hill today, testifying before lawmakers for the first time since the war with Iran began. The defense secretary came out swinging. In his opening statement, he called out Democrats, calling them the biggest adversary in the Iran war.
Pete Hegseth
The biggest challenge, the biggest adversary we face at this point are the reckless, feckless and defeatist words of congressional Democrats and some Republicans. Two months in, I remind you, two months in to a conflict. Two months in on an existential fight for the safety of the American people. Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb. We are proud of this undertaking. I am proud that President Trump has had the courage to do it. And I look forward to sharing more about what our troops have accomplished.
Kristen Welker
The hearing also comes as the Trump administration is facing a May 1 deadline, at which point the president will need congressional authorization to continue the war. Secretary Hegseth was repeatedly pressed today on the administration's strategy and whether the war has been a success. Take a listen.
Congressional Questioner
How is this war going? Do you think we're winning militarily on the battlefield?
Pete Hegseth
It's been an astounding military success.
Congressional Questioner
But are we winning the war?
Pete Hegseth
Absolutely.
Donald Trump
Okay.
Congressional Questioner
So do you call Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz winning?
Pete Hegseth
Well, I would say the blockade that we hold, that doesn't allow anything to come in or out of Iranian ports.
Chuck Rocha
Okay.
Jerome Powell
So always.
Congressional Questioner
So we blockaded their blockade. So they blockaded us and then we blockaded their blockade. That's like saying tag, you're.
Kristen Welker
It's in that same hearing, the Pentagon's top finance official estimated that to date, the war with Iran has cost $25 billion. Joining me now, our team of reporters, NBC News chief business correspondent Christine Romans, NBC News senior national security correspondent Courtney Kuby, NBC News White House correspondent Monica Alba, and NBC News international correspondent Raf Sanchez, who is in Doha for us. Christine, thank you for being here. I have to start with you fresh off that press conference with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. A lot going on from the Fed today, including the uncertainty over the Strait of Hormuz. How did markets react that oil prices rising today?
Christine Romans
And that's because of this sort of impasse in the Strait of Hormuz. And the Fed chief told us that inflation is misbehaving. Developments in the Middle east have caused energy prices to spike and you're beginning to see that filter elsewhere into the economy. So we haven't even seen the peak of that yet. So very closely watching energy prices and what that particular shock is going to mean for consumers in the economy overall.
Kristen Welker
Yeah, Americans are watching energy prices incredibly closely as well. So the Fed, their big decision today, decided to keep rates unchanged. What's the impact? And take us inside the thinking there. How do they get to that decision?
Christine Romans
The inside the thinking is what is the big news here? They didn't cut interest rates, but there were four of these decision makers who decided to dissent, who didn't agree with the Fed's decision today for different reasons. That's the most Christian since October 1992. So that means Jerome Powell, this is his last meeting as Fed chief, he's handing over a Federal Reserve that is showing a little more uncertainty maybe inside the ranks than we have seen in recent memory.
Kristen Welker
And finally, Christine, Fed Chair Powell said that he is in fact planning to stay on as Fed governor. Talk about that decision and what that could mean for the incoming Fed chair.
Christine Romans
It's historic. I mean, this hasn't happened in like 80 years. There is a tradition that if you're the Fed chief, then you leave, you leave the Fed even if there's more time left on your, your seat as a governor. And Jerome Powell said he's going to stay on. He's so concerned about the legal attacks against the institution. This is a little bit of what he said.
Jerome Powell
After my term as Chair ends on May 15, I will continue to serve as a governor for a period of time to be determined. I plan to keep a low profile as a governor. These legal actions by the administration are unprecedented in our 113 year history. And there are ongoing threats of additional such actions. I worry that these attacks are battering the institution and putting at risk the thing that really matters to the public, which is the ability to conduct monetary policy without taking into consideration political factors.
Christine Romans
Now, the Department of Justice has said that it has dropped its probe into Powell and a big renovation project there. But you can see he is not satisfied that there could be, that there won't be other legal attacks or a resumption of that probe in the future. He wants finality and clarity and transparency that these attacks are over before he's
Kristen Welker
going to step aside to put a fine point on it. Christine, this is defiance from the Fed chair.
Christine Romans
It absolutely is. And he says that, look, he made a point of saying the insults that we hear, the words that people say, we don't, we don't even talk about that inside this institution. It's not a problem. It's the legal attacks that are a problem there. And he will stay on tbd. He said he's not going to be a shadow Fed chair for the next person who's coming in. He's going to keep a very low profile, he says, but he wants to stay there in his seat until these legal challenges are truly and finally over.
Kristen Welker
Well, just an historic day at the Fed. We're so glad you were there and could bring us all of that reporting. Christine Court, let me turn to you. Let's talk about this firing hearing that we all watched on Capitol Hill. Defense Secretary Secretary of War Pete Hegseth answering questions. I want to play a little bit more and get your reaction on the other side.
Pete Hegseth
Look, well, their nuclear facilities have been obliterated. Underground. They're buried and watching 24 7. So we know where any nuclear material.
Congressional Questioner
Reclaiming my time. We're watching a second here. We had to start this war, you just said 60 days ago because the nuclear weapon was an imminent threat. Now you're saying that it was completely
Pete Hegseth
obliterated, not given up their nuclear ambitions and they had a conventional shield of thousands.
Congressional Questioner
So Operation Midnight Hammer accomplishment, nothing of substance it missing. You're missing the point place we were
Pete Hegseth
before so much so their facilities are bombed and obliterated. Their their ambitions continued.
Kristen Welker
Just some of the many fireworks today. Court, what were some of your biggest takeaways in addition to that exchange?
Courtney Kuby
Yeah, I mean, that really underscores just how there has been so much confusion about the ultimate military objectives here. And what's really funny to me, Kristen, is the administration has just not done a good job of explaining exactly what they hope to do with respect to Iranian nuclear facilities and their capab and the goal sector. Hicks has touched on it a tiny bit there when he said it's about taking out their conventional capability. So they don't have the ability to defend a nuclear program, but instead they get so hung up on arguing about how their facilities were obliterated. They clearly weren't. They were deeply buried. They were badly destroyed in most cases. But there's still no indication that they have not only destroyed the highly enriched uranium stockpile, but that they have destroyed their capability and their ambitions to ultimately get a nuclear weapon. That was just one of the many exchanges that we saw about Iran today. That really shows how there is frustration on both sides of the aisle on Capitol Hill about the lack of transparency about the objectives and the ultimate aims here of this war well, it was
Kristen Welker
just a remarkable hearing. Courtney, let me ask you because to the key point that you're making about the administration, the president's strategy, did Secretary Hegseth reveal any new information?
Courtney Kuby
No, not really. I mean we did learn about the $25 billion cost, the price tag of Operation Epic Fury right now, but it' still not 100% clear exactly what that encompasses. So for instance, is it is that sort of the burn rate of what they've been going through? So the munitions that they've used, the aircraft that have been damaged or destroyed, just a wear and tear on things. Those ships, three carriers strike groups, you know, once they're out on a deployment like that, especially the Ford, they're going to be in the docks for a while, like a year. Plus it's very expensive and that's there's also the destroyers and everything else. Does that cost also encompass encompass rebuying new munitions and buying new aircraft? All it's not really clear. And then we don't even know if it includes the cost of the blockade, which is also extremely expensive and has no end in sight.
Kristen Welker
And Court, he was also pressed on the firing of the army chief of staff Randy George. What did he say about that?
Courtney Kuby
That was another one that was bipartisan. At least two Republican members also also weighed in on that. One of them was Don Bacon, Congressman Republican planning to retire. He's a retired one star general so it's not surprising he's been outspoken. But what was really remarkable about that, it's the first time that we've heard from Secretary Hegseth about that that firing because he's not an before. He didn't deny that he was behind those firings, but he wouldn't he didn't apologize for them either. And he said that it was in part it was about cleaning up the department that had been damaged for years by certain perceptions. So he didn't address it directly, but he didn't deny it.
Kristen Welker
Well, it's a fascinating day for Capitol Hill. You were there to cover it.
Courtney Kuby
It's been a long day, long hearing.
Kristen Welker
Thank you for bringing us all of that information. Court and Christine, we really appreciate it. Great to see you both. Monica Alba, let me turn to you at the White House. I know you've been working your sources throughout the what are the discussions that you are hearing? I know that one of the key focuses is whether and how and when the president may decide to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. What are you hearing about that, Monica?
Monica Alba
Yeah, we heard a little bit from the president himself today to build upon some of the reporting that Courtney and I have been able to do about what options the president was presented with on Monday in a Situation Room meeting that we've learned a little bit more about. We know that they have been having ongoing discussions about what might happen next. The ongoing blockade, which the president does continue to say he believes is incredibly effective, he says and is arguing that he even believes that the naval blockade could be more effective than, quote, bombing. So it sounds like that is the strategy for the moment, while they still weigh and make a big decision that we understand hasn't been finalized yet about whether the president is going to potentially pursue other options before making a decision about exactly what the next steps are here. But what the president did sort of rule out for now, Kristen, is he said that he wasn't going to be sending his top aides, his negotiating team in person to any potential negotiations in Pakistan or anywhere else for the moment, saying instead that there have been some communications telephonically over the phone and that those conversations maybe will continue, though it's unclear exactly who's a part of them and where they could go. So it does seem the president is at this crossroads. He's been at them for a long time during the course of this eight week conflict, conflict to make a decision about whether he wants to escalate or whether he wants to pursue a different path. But ultimately it seems like he's pretty convinced on keeping the blockade in place, at least for now. Kristen?
Kristen Welker
Well, it's just so striking because you have to wonder what the impact will be on the energy markets and oil and the price of gas, of course, at the pump. Monica let me ask you, because of course the president is facing a May 1 deadline that that's 60 days by law. He has to then go to Congress, get authorization to continue any military conflict. And I know that there's a big debate about that brewing on Capitol Hill. What do we know about how he's approaching this deadline?
Monica Alba
Monica we have asked the White House this repeatedly, Kristen, and they haven't really told us how they view this deadline that is, as you point out, a clear law that is mandated in terms of notifying and getting and seeking approval from Congress. There is a little bit of a debate, it seems like, about the interpretation of the 60 days, given that there is currently a cease fire in place. And we know that people like Vice President Vance have been a little bit dismissive about the interpretation of the War Powers act and whether this is something that would really be necessary even though it is very clear from lawmakers of both parties that that is what they want and expect the president to do. So we are kind of watching and waiting with everybody else to see exactly how the White House approaches this.
Kristen Welker
And Monica, just finally we learned the president spoke to Vladimir Putin today. What can you tell us about that?
Monica Alba
And a pretty lengthy phone call, which it typically is given. You have to allow for the interpreters, but about an hour and a half of conversation. And the president himself detailed that they talked about a lot of different things that they talked about the war in Iran. And he was even asked whether he believes the war in Iran or the war in Ukraine will end first. And the president said, well, maybe they're both going to end on a sort of of similar timetable, which really raises a lot of questions about the timing for both of those very serious conflicts.
Kristen Welker
Certainly does. Monica Alba at the White House, as always, thank you so much. Good to see you. Let me turn to Raf Sanchez reporting from Doha. Raf, thank you so much for joining us. Take us inside your conversations there in the region. What is the mood with negotiations now stalled?
Raf Sanchez
So, Kristen, in a word, the mood is uncertainty. It's quiet here in the Gulf. It's been a couple of weeks since the skies were full of Iranian in missiles and drones. But people here are on edge. They have no idea if or when the fighting might resume. You notice people are flinching when doors slam after weeks and weeks of bombardment here. And there is a real feeling among America's Arab allies here in the Gulf that they are just not in control of their own destiny. They are kind of at the mercy of the United States and Iran. Either side could declare an end to this ceasefire at any point. And of course, the Strait of Hormuz, which is so critical to the economies of these countries and remains shut, and they just have absolutely no sense like the rest of the world, when it might reopen.
Kristen Welker
Well enough. The president saying he's prepared to actually maintain the US Blockade of Iran's ports. What are the implications for Gulf nations? And I believe you spoke to the Qatar foreign minister about that.
Raf Sanchez
Yeah. So the implications absolutely massive. Qatar, one of the world's biggest exporters of liquefied natural gas. Of course, Saudi Arabia, the uae, some of the world's biggest oil exporters. These are economies that totally depends on getting their energy exports out. And yet we had an opportunity to speak to the spokesman for the Qatari Foreign Ministry about US Policy towards the strait. Take a listen to a little bit of that conversation. Would you like to see the United States end its own blockade in the strait as a way of lowering tensions.
Qatari Foreign Ministry Spokesman
Now, let me make it very clear, the closing of the Strait of Hormuz has resulted in economic implications for the whole world. So our focus is on ending that war, on reaching a diplomatic solution that hopefully would mean that you would not resort back to the use of the strait as leverage. But of course, we call on all parties to open the strait immediately.
Raf Sanchez
And I asked him whether he was open, his country was open to the latest Iranian proposal, which is a national narrow deal, Kristen, that would reopen the Strait of Hormuz, but it would leave the nuclear issue for another day. He said Qatar, like the other Gulf states, wants to see a comprehensive agreement between the US And Iran to make sure that there is not a resumption of fighting a year from now. But he did say they are open to some kind of incremental deal which if it would open the strait, would be a good thing for the whole region.
Kristen Welker
Just so much uncertainty. Raf Sanchez, thank you so much. Thank you for bringing up us your great exchange there. We really appreciate it. Coming up, new details about the assassination attempt at the White House Correspondents Dinner and new images released by federal prosecutors of the gunman as he prepared for the attack. Plus, my one on one with Democratic Congressman and former Army Ranger Jason Crow about the questions he put to Defense Secretary Peter Hegseth today on the Hill and much more. Stay with us. You're watching MEET THE press. Now.
Huntington Bank Advertiser
Is your money just lying around? Switch to Huntington bank. And your money's always doing something like auto saving for special events, tracking your teen spending and helping protect your parents from fraud. Let's get more from money. Switch to Huntington Bank. Welcome. Eligibility requirements apply. Some features may require enrollment.
DSW Advertiser
You know that thing where you get an amazing pair of shoes at a really great price and want to tell everyone about it?
Donald Trump
Yeah.
DSW Advertiser
So do we here at Designer Shoe Warehouse. We'll give you something to brag about, like the latest styles from brands you love or the trends everyone's obsessing over or shoes that make you feel like, well, you. So go ahead, show off a little. Buying shoes that get you at prices that get your budget. Head to your DSW store or dsw.com today. DSW. Let us surprise you.
Huntington Bank Advertiser
Get the best of NBC News with a subscription, fewer ads, deeper access and exclusive content. And now during the Xfinity Member celebration, members can get an an exclusive 50% off an annual subscription. Head to xfinity.com membership to learn more. Xfinity Imagine that subscription automatically renews each year at $65.99, plus taxes and fees until canceled. Offer ends May 20, 2026. Prices subject to change. Visit nbcnews.comxfinity for full offer terms and details.
Kristen Welker
Welcome back. Turning now to breaking news tied to the Department of Justice. Former FBI Director James Comey appearing in federal court today. Comey surrendering to authorities in Alexandria, Virginia, a day after a grand jury in North Carolina indicted him on two counts related to threats against the president. The grand jury saying Comey knowingly and willfully threatened the life and bodily harm of the president. Comey denies the charges and said he is innocent. The indictment stemming from this picture the former FBI director posted on social media last year of seashells on a Beach arraigned to say 86, 47, 86 is a term that can mean to get rid of. And Trump is, of course, the 47th president. This afternoon, President Trump told reporters he believes Comey's post was, in fact, a threat.
Donald Trump
Look, well, if anybody knows anything about crime, they know 86. You know what? 86, it's a mob term for kill them. You know, you ever see the movies? 86 of them, the mobster says to one of his wonderful associates, 86 of that means kill him. It's, I think of it as a mob term. People think of it as something having to do with disappearing. But the mob uses that term to say when they want to kill somebody.
Kristen Welker
But do you really think your life is in danger?
Congressional Questioner
Probably.
Donald Trump
I don't know, you know, based on, based on what I'm seeing out there. Yeah. The people like Comey have created trust, tremendous danger. I think for politicians and others.
Kristen Welker
It comes as Justice Department officials release new documents and new details about Saturday night's assassination attempt at the White House Correspondents Dinner, including new photos of the suspected gunman, Cole Allen. You can see them here. The DOJ says he took this in his hotel room, arming himself with an array of weaponry shortly before the attack. Now, other photos include these two guns, which investigators say Allen had with him when he was arrested, along with knives and other weapons in his possession. The Justice Department filing also depicted the dramatic moment Allen charged through a security checkpoint one floor above the ballroom where the dinner was being held and allegedly opened fire. NBC News senior Justice reporter Ryan Reilly joins me now. I do want to start with the White House correspondent's dinner attack. Let's talk about today's DOJ filing. What stood out to you? And of course, those just really astonishing photos.
Ryan Reilly
Yeah. Well, first of all, Our colleague Kelly o' Donnell just confirmed that the shot that according to two law enforcement officials, the shot that was fired that struck an officer was fired by the suspect. And that was sort of a question. So this was not a friendly fire.
Kristen Welker
So this is significant. Let's just pause right here because there have been a lot of questions about who, in fact struck the Secret Service officer. You are saying that law enforcement officials have now confirmed that they believe it was the suspect?
Ryan Reilly
Yeah, that's according to our own Kelly o'. Donnell. And I think, you know, overall out exactly how he got to D.C. you know, there's some talk about him taking the train. He was taking notes on his trip to Chicago and then to D.C. and then he went into. And he was actually he not only he read stories about what was happening during the White House Correspondents association dinner and the weekend. Right. So he looked actually at one of the things I found that he looked at a list from the Georgetowner that showed all the events that were happening that weekend. And so, you know, it's he. There was a theoretical universe in which he could have targeted some other events. Event and not just the most highly secured component of this, which was, of course, obviously inside of the dinner that evening.
Kristen Welker
Wow, that's really chilling. And any more details about that photo? He took it in the moments before he decided to carry out this attack. The sense that he was watching it unfold was confident the president was in the room right before he went down.
Jason Crow
I mean, the thing that struck me
Ryan Reilly
also, it seemed like he was trying to blend in.
Sahil Kapoor
Right.
Ryan Reilly
He has like, like relatively, you know, he has a suit, he has a tie on. Right. He has a black shirt on. So it's not as though he was. He kind of might have blended in some respects. And remember, you also had individuals who were undercover in that capacity who were dressed, you know, in the ballroom and around that area in suits who you did not realize necessarily right off the bat were law enforcement who were armed. And so this was a really dangerous situation. He gets right past that initial barricade and then he was. He was taken down shortly thereafter.
Kristen Welker
Yeah. Well, we thank law enforcement for keeping everyone. Let me ask you about James Comey, this new indictment. What are the latest steps? He appeared in court today.
Ryan Reilly
Yeah, he made that initial appearance in Alexandria. That's not where the case is going to play out. It's going to play out ultimately in North Carolina. But I did get a chance to question the acting attorney General, Todd Blanche today about this case and asked him how confident he was whether or not this would ultimately result in a conviction, because under the Justice Manual, you're not supposed to bring forward a case unless you actually think there's a high likelihood of you being able to secure a conviction. And he said he' not sure exactly how the jury will ultimately handle this case. He said that, you know, it's not smart for prosecutors to predict how any jury will ultimately handle a case. But every legal expert I've talked to across the board and even a lot of conservatives who normally are very defensive of the president have publicly posted about how they just don't see this case having any chance of success. It's going to be dismissed at one of these early motions just because, you know, on First Amendment grounds, on retaliation grounds, that this is all driven by the president. So the likelihood that this even gets to the jury ultimately, I think is pretty slow.
Kristen Welker
Ryan Reilly with a lot of breaking developments for us today. We really appreciate it. Thank you so very much. Joining me now is Democratic Congressman Jason Crow of Colorado, who serves on the House Armed Services and Intelligence Committee. Congressman, thank you so very much for being here. Really appreciate it.
Jason Crow
Thanks, Kristen. Good to be with you.
Kristen Welker
Well, it's wonderful to have you. I do want to start with the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey. You have also been a target of this administration when they trust tried but failed to indict you over that video you made. You told troops that they can disobey orders that they deem to be illegal. What was your reaction to this latest indictment of James Comey?
Jason Crow
This is another example of the Trump administration weaponizing Americans Department of Justice against Donald Trump's political enemies, using their taxpayer dollars. People who are supposed to to be focused in Washington and elsewhere on cyber crime, on elder fraud, on health care fraud, on organized crime, on violent crime around our country are instead being used to settle scores by Donald Trump.
Ryan Reilly
Right.
Jason Crow
Americans should be upset about this more than anybody else because it's their money and it's their prosecutors who are being used and abused for purposes that Donald Trump sees fit in any given day.
Kristen Welker
Let's talk about the actual indictment. It says that these numbers, we'll put them up on the screen again, 8647 are a threat to take the life of the president. You see them right there in seashells. Legal scholars, though, many of them congressmen, say while the post might show poor judgment, it is protected political speech. How do you see this playing out? Do you have faith in the Justice Department?
Jason Crow
Yeah, I think it was a bad idea. But is it A crime? Absolutely not a crime. I mean, I'll have to defer to Donald Trump. He says it's organized crime slang and criminal activity. I'll defer to him on that. And he's the expert on those issues. What I do know is that that term actually originated from 1930s diner slang, when something was out of order or out of stock. So a lot of interpretations around it. But the larger issue remains the same and that that Donald Trump and his cronies and political hacks now at DOJ continue to do his bidding against political enemies. And it's the American people. It's the rule of law that suffers. Right. He came after me back in February. He tried to indict me. He tried to send me to prison. You know, my high crime, telling service members to follow the law and obey the Constitution. Right. So that's one of many examples of what this president is doing to erode our democracy in the rule of law in this country.
Kristen Welker
I want to play something that Republican Senator Thom Tillis said about the Comey indictment earlier today and get your reaction on the other side. Take a listen.
Senator Thom Tillis
Hopefully there's more to it than just the picture in the sand. Otherwise, I just think it's another example of where we're going to regret this because we're setting a fairly low bar. And political physics, like I've sat around here for years, is what it is. For every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction.
Kristen Welker
What do you make of that? Equal and opposite reaction? Do you think that there could be such a reaction from Democrats if they were to take back the House, for example, or the White House?
Jason Crow
Well, my first reaction is I really hope that more Republicans, other than those who are retiring, like Tom Kellis, stand up and push back on this. Like we need more than just retiring Republicans to show courage and to help us fight for the rule of law in our democracy. I'm glad that he is, but he's in very, very small company right now. So that's number one. Number two is, no, we're not like them.
Donald Trump
Right.
Jason Crow
His comment is we're going to come back and do the same thing. No, we're not. Because guess what? We believe in the rule of law. We believe in democracy. Does that mean that we won't pursue accountability? No, we will pursue accountability. We will pursue justice. We will do so according to the law and according to the way that our democracy says it should be done. We are not like them, and we will not act like them.
Kristen Welker
Okay, let me turn now to the fiery hearing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appearing before the House Armed Services Committee, which again, you sit on. I want to play a little bit of what he had to say when he was asked what's the biggest threat to Americans right now? Here's what he said.
Pete Hegseth
The biggest challenge, the biggest adversary we face at this point are the reckless, feckless and defeatist words of congressional Democrats and some Republicans. Two months in, I remind you, two months in. To a conflict. Two months in on an existential fight for the safety of the American people. Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb.
Kristen Welker
And, Congressman, I should clarify, that was actually his opening statement. You are, of course, a veteran. You served in the Iraq war. What was your reaction to the argument that Democrats are threatening the safety of the American people?
Jason Crow
Well, it's horrible when you have the sitting secretary of defense coming before committee in his opening statements, before any word is said on either side of the aisle and said that we're the enemy of this country, we're the adversary. That kind of tells you everything you need to say. I mean, he is politicizing the military. He is changing the very face of what we have long cherished as a nonpartisan, you know, melting pot of this nation. I served three combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. When I think of America, I still think of the faces of those paratroopers that I served with who are black, white, Asian, Hispanic, straight, gay, Republican, Democrat. We came together and we fought together. We were brothers and sisters. And Pete Hegseth has turned his back on that very notion. But what's more is he's also saying that we don't have the right as members of Congress to actually question wars and conflict. We just, you know, get in line and just say it's okay to do whatever they want to do. That's not our role. That's not the Constitution. You know, again, I served in Iraq and Afghanistan. And to do that, our service members must know, they absolutely have to know that members of Congress are sitting here in this Capitol asking tough questions, holding people to account, making sure that they're protected. That is our job. That is my commitment to our military men and women. And I will never back down from that.
Kristen Welker
Did you gain any more clarity on the goal of this war, Congressman, after this hearing today?
Jason Crow
No, absolutely not. They still have not told us what their overall goal is. They have not told us what the off ramp and the end game is, you know, which is exactly why Americans don't support it. This is overwhelmingly unpopular. Donald Trump knows that. Pete Hegseth knows that. So they're just doubling and tripling down on it it and frankly lying to us about what is actually going on. America spent five to eight trillion dollars over the last 20 years, 7,000American lives, our credibility, tens of thousands of Americans came home bearing the invisible, invisible scars of this battle. The working class bore the burden of this people that I was raised with and who I fought with. They have had enough. They've had enough of endless conflict in the Middle east, not being able to pay for their groceries, their health care, their housing, their rent and mortgage while we spend tens of billions of dollars on endless conflict. I've had enough of it. And I'm not going to take their lies. I'm not going to sit there and just get in line as Pete Hexeth wants me to do and stop asking questions. I'm going to do everything possible to try to stop it.
Kristen Welker
I want to ask you about the assassination attempt that took place at the White House Correspondence Dinner. You serve as the top Democrat in the bipartisan task force investigating the incident and the assassination attempt against President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. And after that incident, the head of Secret Service said that it would spark a, quote, paradigm shift in how it protects the president. Do you think there has, in fact, been a paradigm shift since Butler, Congressman?
Jason Crow
I haven't seen that. As you mentioned, I helped lead that investigation because political violence is unacceptable. It doesn't matter where it comes from, doesn't matter what the reason is, doesn't matter who the target is. We must, as Americans say, never, never will we allow it. Never is it justifiable. Right. And that's why I agreed to help lead this investigation. We did a comprehensive investigation over about five months, released 180 page report with 37 recommendations for a very fundamental reform on how we protect VIPs, the president, the vice president, members of Congress. What I want to know, my question is, is how many of those 37 specific bipartisan reforms that every Democrat and Republican agreed to unanimously on that task force? How many of those have been implemented because we know what we need to do to raise the fences and protect people. The question is whether or not we have actually done that.
Kristen Welker
All right. Well, Congressman, we will continue to track that angle. Certainly. We really appreciate your joining us to discuss a range of topics. Congressman Jason Crow, thank you so much.
Jason Crow
Thank you.
Kristen Welker
Coming up next, a landmark decision today at the Supreme Court limiting the Voting Rights act. That could pave the way for more Republican redistricting and less representation in Congress for minorities. Stay with us. You're watching MEET THE PRESS Now. Welcome back. Turning now to a major decision from the Supreme Court today in a ruling that places new limits on the Voting Rights act, which could have sweeping consequences in the battle for control of Congress in favor of Republicans. In a 6, 3 decision, the court's conservative majority ruled that a congressional map in Louisiana, which was drawn to comply with the Voting Rights act by ensuring the state had a certain number of districts represented by minority voters, was a, quote, unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The ruling opens the door for Republicans across multiple states to now redraw a number of districts currently represented by Democrats. The White House responding to the ruling, calling it a complete and total victory for American voters and adding the color of one's skin should not dictate which congressional district you belong in. Democratic House leader Hakeem Jeffries saying the Supreme Court, quote, has taken a blowtorch to the Voting Rights act and making the case for Congress to pass an updated Voting Rights Act. Joining me now is NBC News senior Supreme Court reporter Lawrence Hurley and senior reporter Jane Timm. Thanks to both of you for being here. Lawrence, let me start with you. Take us through this ruling. What impact does it have on the Voting Rights act and just how significant is this?
Lawrence Hurley
Yeah, it's a very significant ruling. This, this case is basically a collision between long running litigation over Louisiana's congressional district map and the conservative justices long held kind of suspicion about the Voting Rights act and their belief in what they see as being a colorblind Constitution. So in trying to draw a new map to comply with the Voting Rights Act Act, Louisiana added another minority majority district making two. And then they then got that map, then got challenged from the other side by non minority voters and a court struck it down as well. So now this comes to the Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito writing the majority opinion, kind of following up his, his position in other cases, saying that, you know, the Constitution is basically colorblind. You shouldn't really be able to consider race at all in any kind of consideration of the law. The court just about left the door open to maybe some kind of race, racial gerrymandering claim in the future, but not really. And Justice Elena Kagan, one of the liberal justices, dissented and making the case that, well, really the court didn't leave the door open at all, saying it made Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act a dead letter, effectively.
Etsy Advertiser
Who are you celebrating this Mother's Day shop Etsy for special gifts. Gifts made for every kind of mom, whether you're looking for a handmade planter for a plant mom, an adorable custom collar for a pet mom or a personalized gift to commemorate a mom's first Mother's Day. It's all on Etsy. Celebrate all moms with unexpected gifts on Etsy Celebrate being human.
DSW Advertiser
At dsw, we ask the important questions like what shoes are you going to wear? Whether you're prepping for wedding seasons, festival season, or just planning the ultimate vacay, the right shoes can make or break an rsvp. So own the moment. You've got big plans and we've got just the shoes at the perfect price, of course. Get ready to get ready with Designer Shoe Warehouse. Head to your DSW store or dsw.com today and let us surprise you.
Willie Geist
Hey guys, Willie Geist here reminding you to check out the Sunday Sit down podcast. On this week's episode, I sit down with one of the biggest bands in the world, Mumford and Son, as we get the boys together to talk about their new number one album, Prize Fighter, and the evolution of that irresistible foot stomping sound. You can get our conversation for free wherever you download your podcasts.
Kristen Welker
Lawrence, Fascinating stuff. Thank you. Jane, let me turn to you. We're six months away from the midterm elections. You've been working to figure out just how much of an impact this decision could have. What have you determined?
Jane Timm
Yeah, my colleagues and I have been on the phone all day trying to get a sense of who is going to try and redraw their maps this year. Now, many primaries have actually already begun with early voting or have already been completed in those states. It's going to be really unlikely that you're going to see new maps this year. And to be sure, the biggest impact of this ruling will come next year when I say more than a dozen states are likely to start redrawing their maps. But this year we know there are some primaries still scheduled for later in the summer. Florida, of course, was doing their map today. But also look at Tennessee, Tennessee, Missouri, even Maryland, a blue state. Other states can still have time to redraw their maps if there is the legislative desire to in these states, places like Louisiana are going to want to do this. They've made it clear in Alabama, the attorney general there has said they're going to look into this. They have another case that's been appealed to the Supreme Court about that. But, but this, this ruling will have far, far fetching effects both on these midterms with a few seats that may change hands based on this as well as in next year when you' see just sort of an all out new era of redistricting with very few rules and guardrails.
Kristen Welker
Well, that's a great way to put it. We've already seen this big tit for tat over redistricting. The Florida legislature just passed a redistricting plan that would benefit Republicans. That comes on the heels of these legal challenges to Virginia's map being redrawn right now. Who's on top, Jane?
Jane Timm
Well, right now, I mean, I think this morning Democrats were on top. This afternoon I think it's Republicans, whether or not that map has been signed into law. But important to say that this is also not settled. I mean, Florida has a state constitutional prohibition on partisan gerrymandering and their map, as you can see, is a very red map. They have made no mistakes about this, that they are intending to draw new Republican seats. Governor Ron DeSantis said today that he thinks that the Calais ruling actually invalidates the state prohibition on partisan gerrymandering and essentially trying to use that ruling to get his map across the finish line and through the courts in his state. But of course, this is all going to go to the courts, too.
Kristen Welker
Lawrence, just one more. Finally, before I let you go, we had heard arguments today in a key case at the Supreme Court. What happened there?
Lawrence Hurley
Well, in this case, the court was debating the Trump administration's attempt to end what's called temporary protected status for immigrants who've come into the US From Haiti and Syria, which is part of a broader the anti immigration program, as we know. And the administration has also tried to restrict it from other countries as well. And lower courts have blocked it. And as they've done with a lot of other cases, the Trump administration rushed up to the Supreme Court to try and get them to allow them to enact the policy. So we'll be getting a ruling on that soon. It kind of seems like it wasn't clear exactly how the court was going to rule on that case, but we were looking for that ruling in the weeks of ahead.
Kristen Welker
All right. I know you'll stay on top of all of it, Lawrence. Jane, thank you both so much. Coming up after the break, we're live on Capitol Hill where House Speaker Johnson is struggling to corral his Republican conference at a pivotal stretch for his party and the president. This is MEET THE PRESS now. Welcome back. The House is set to vote on an extension of section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance act after clearing a key procedural hurdle earlier today following hours of deliberation between party leadership and some rank and file Republicans who voiced concerns about warrantless Surveillance. Joining me now is NBC News national political reporter Sahil Kapoor. So, Sahil, the House is set to vote any minute now on this measure. What are the prospects of Congress reaching a deal to reauthorize 702 and talk about the significance of 702 for folks who don't understand?
Sahil Kapoor
Yeah, absolutely, Chris. And the prospects have improved dramatically on this Pfizer section, section 702 bill, three year reauthorization passing after they got that rule done. This was a long, drawn out process, about two hours on the floor, whereas a group of conservative rebels had to be placated. One of the issues here was privacy advocates and civil liberties advocates on both the left of the Democratic Party and the right of the Republican Party have demanded reforms to Section 702, specifically protections such as a warrant requirement so the government cannot review the data of American citizens that gets sweeped up as part of this surveillance. They did not Republican leadership put a warrant requirement in here, but they put some more symbolic concessions that appear to have placated just enough Republicans to move this to a vote, including a monthly civil liberties review, a civil liberties protection officer and beefing up criminal penalty for knowingly targeting Americans. Now in these sorts of things, Kristen, as you know, they will lose some Republicans, but they'll likely win some Democrats because there's a vast group in the middle that is aligned with the national security establishment and both parties in favor of this program. If it does expire, the government believes that it will lose a really important tool to go after terrorist plots and espionage.
Kristen Welker
Let's talk about the implications of all of this for House Speaker Mike Johnson. There was a lot of uncertainty swirling around whether this was would make it over the finish line. Now it appears it will. Has this strengthened him or weakened his speakership? How do you see this playing out? Sahil?
Sahil Kapoor
Well, Kristen, the rule vote is not exactly a major win for Speaker Johnson. It's the equivalent of you and I getting up and going to work. It's an automatic thing. It should happen all the time. It's only an event when it doesn't happen. And this is emblematic of Speaker Johnson and House GOP leaders struggle to corral of this conference. And it happens at exactly the same time that President Trump's approval rating is declining, not just with the public overall, but crucially here in the House of Representatives politically with Republican voters. One recent Associated Press poll showed it as low as 68%. That's just his approval among Republicans. A Fox News poll showed it at 83%, which is lower than the sky high 90 plus percent that Trump has had over the last year, which is critical to him being able to twist arms and get people in line. So there's also the fact that the president is a little bit distracted from domestic affairs by the war in Iran, as you can imagine, has a little bit less time to make calls here and twist arms.
Kristen Welker
So what are the implications of all of this for other Republican priorities like funding dhs? DHS remains shut down.
Sahil Kapoor
Yes. So right after this vote, Kristen, they're going to be voting on the budget resolution that passed the Senate, which begins work on that party line bill to fund ICE and cbp. Remember, they ripped this out of the bipartisan DHS bill because they couldn't come to a deal with Democrats. This is another thing that Speaker Johnson has struggled to win enough votes in the House to do. Many Republicans in his conference have refused to vote on the bill to reopen dhs. That passed the Senate unanimously until there's work done, until maybe even the reconciliation bill itself passes. So they want ICE and CBP fund before the rest of DHS is funded, which has slowed everything down. This is another area where Speaker Johnson has been somewhat overrun by his conference because like the White House, he did want to open up DHS earlier because we're now on day 74 of the shutdown. It's a record long shutdown and it could have serious implications for paychecks and create another TSA crisis if it doesn't get resolved soon. Kristen.
Kristen Welker
Yeah, it's hard to believe it's been 74 days. Sahil, thank you so much. Joining me now to discuss all of this, today's pay, Khadija Goba, politics reporter for notice, Chuck Rocha, co host of the Latino Vote podcast and president of Solidarity Strategies. And Ashley Davis, veteran of the George W. Bush White House and author of the new book the Power Pivot with Grit, Grace and Growth. Thanks to all of you. Congratulations, Ashley, on your congratulations. Thank you. Yes, we will have to get that.
Ashley Davis
You have a really long title. And now I have a really long title.
Kristen Welker
The title just got longer. Khadiya, let me start with you. Let's talk about what is happening on Capitol Hill. So much uncertainty whether, as Sahil says, this measure, the reauthorization of 702 surveillance act, would pass. The fact that it has been held up this long is a problem and speaks to some of the dysfunction.
Khadija Goba
Yeah. Kristen, let me preface this by saying it's not only the FISA bill, there's also the farm bill. And as Sahil mentioned the Dharma. Now members of Congress went through this two weeks ago. They spent hours on Capitol Hill with no results and ended up leaving at like 1:30 in the morning having a failed vote on FISA. So the prospect of this passing has improved because the all of them came back to the table, White House included and you know, kind of added some more protections. Not necessarily the warrant that some of the hard right members are wanting, but I think they've moved it enough to get more Democrats to cover those votes that they'll lose on the right. So it should, it is looking promising is what I'm hearing in terms of fisa, but it has just been an incredible week of frustrated members and ongoing angst.
Kristen Welker
Speaker Johnson has had so many challenges corralling his Republican conference. Could this undercut his leadership? Could it jeopardize it could.
Ashley Davis
Well, listen, I mean there are many factions of the Republican Party right now and obviously you have the extreme right that are very powerful because even if there are, let's say there's mainly seven really are able to make a difference because he has such few votes. But what's interesting is Kevin McCarthy is the one that put some of the extreme right on the Rules Committee. Historically the Rules Committee is made up of the Speaker's allies. So the speaker has inherited that. I actually think that Johnson pulled off a miracle today and how it happened, Rule collect connected both the farm bill, FISA and also this budget reconciliation bill. The farm bill was taken, it was passed in the roll, but they're not going to handle the farm bill, this ethanol piece for farmers until after the recess. And so they're just voting today tonight on FISA and the budget and I think both will pass.
Kristen Welker
Given that, could it actually embolden him? Ashley, do you think?
Ashley Davis
Listen, I don't know how anyone can take on this management. I think Nancy Pelosi was the best manager of the Speaker I've ever seen. Like just. I think she was a really good manager. But I think the speaker has done a really good job with the cards he's been dealt.
Kristen Welker
Chuck, as you know, when you look at the polling, voters don't have a whole lot of confidence in either party. Why should they have more confidence in Democrats if they were, for example, to win back the House to do a better job when they would be dealing with a Republican White House and we'd have to see what happens in the Senate.
Chuck Rocha
Sahil made a great comment about the popularity or the lacking of popularity of Donald Trump. I would remind everybody at home that Donald Trump is still twice as popular as the U.S. congress, no matter which party you're talking about. Because folks are frustrated.
Kristen Welker
Yes.
Chuck Rocha
They're frustrated that they don't feel their lives getting any better. And to your question about why and what Democrats could do right now, in campaigns that I'm running from coast to coast, we're talking about Democrats being a check on the power of the Senate or the president to try to have some compromise to actually get something done. They're hearing about fisa. They're hearing about these things that have to do with dhs. They and that, but none of that says my friend actually will laugh at me, has anything to do with gas prices or has to do with other things because we have to stay on message about that. Because that's what the American people feel.
Kristen Welker
Yeah. I mean, how concerned are you? I mean, gas prices went up again.
Ashley Davis
It's a very big concern. And it's a very big concern going into the midterm. I think even talking to many Republicans, I think that they see the writing on the wall, which this is why democracy works. If people are mad, they vote out who's in charge. And I think there will be a major change, at least in the House. I'm not there on the Senate. I think our numbers are a little bit stronger there. But as Chuck saying, and who if Jefferies is the new speaker, which I'm assuming he would be if the Democrats win, I think he may have a bigger margin which will make it a little bit easier for him to get pieces of legislation through which won't pass.
Chuck Rocha
But with what we just saw with the Supreme Court today, that could change you reporting earlier about there could be lines being drawn in the next 30 days that could really change Johnson having more favor of us having even a smaller majority because they may get rid of five or 10 seats.
Kristen Welker
Kadeel, let me turn to you on James Comey, this latest indictment of James Comey for this picture that he posted of the seashells. 86, 47, basically saying get rid of 47. Being the 47th president of the United States, President Trump. How is this playing out politically? Because. Because what we are seeing is it feels like the partisan divides are deepening over this with accusations that this is purely political indictment.
Khadija Goba
I don't see it bleeding into the midterms, but it does.
Kristen Welker
You don't?
Qatari Foreign Ministry Spokesman
Okay.
Khadija Goba
I do see Democrats jumping on the opportunity to say, to use the president's talking points about political persecution and even, and if I even heard a Democrat talk about, say today that Jerome Powell's investigation is very costly. So there they are tapping into that affordability element with saying, like, the government is spending a lot of money on investigations that are gonna go nowhere. So, I mean, I don't think it's going to. I don't think voters. It'll resonate with voters. I think it's just the political football that actual lawmakers will have to deal with in the judicial system, Obviously.
Kristen Welker
Chuck, James Comey is one of those fascinating figures in Washington. Washington who has plenty of enemies on both sides.
Chuck Rocha
Thank you for saying. Just fixed to jump in, please.
Kristen Welker
How will Democrats see this moment? You do have legal experts saying this may have been the wrong move, but it doesn't make it indictable.
Chuck Rocha
I asked lawyers last night on tv and I talked to lawyers a lot, Ashley. But I talked to a lawyer last night about this particular thing and saying, can you just take a picture to a grand jury to get an indictment? He's like, sure, you. You can. But it doesn't mean that there's proof that there is, that somebody said they wanted to kill somebody. And this is not going to. You're exactly right. It's not going to be an election thing. You're not going to have Democrats running to James Comey's defense. They remember what he did to Hillary Clinton, but they do use this as one more example of his reach of trying to take control of something. And the retribution piece, voters don't like that piece. They don't like to see their government being retributions against anybody. They think that power should be used for the government, not on its citizens.
Kristen Welker
Ashley, what about that idea of retribution? Todd Blanch is the acting attorney general. He's not the attorney general yet. So the accusation you're hearing from a number of Democrats is this is a move by him to try to get the job. Get that job.
Courtney Kuby
Yeah, right.
Ashley Davis
Or it's a play to the base that. That does hate Comey. But listen, I think this started. And I'm not going to pick political sides here. This started with the Russian collusion under. I mean, this has been. The Justice Department has been politicized for way too long, too long on both sides. And I think that this is another political issue that no one. Nothing's going to come. I think it's a freedom of speech issue, actually, that. That is why he probably won't be indicted. But I just think that the Justice Department, when I was in the Bush White House, that's not how it worked. And it's been that way for the last eight years.
Kristen Welker
Chuck, pick up on that point because how does the country step back from what Ashley is describing, which is that there is skepticism on both sides about the Justice Department? I don't mean this Justice Department. I mean in general.
Chuck Rocha
And right now we're moving into a midterm election. And for all of you at home, that's different than a presidential normally you're, you have about 40% less people that show up. So it's about turnout and motivation. To Ashley's point, this could be a strategy to get your base to show up when they normally wouldn't. But also to your point, it could get people to step back and go, I'm not even going to show up in the midterms. I'm going to wait till the next presidential. And that's not we don't want.
Kristen Welker
Yeah. Khadija, you've said you don't see it playing a huge role in the midterms. And I guess the question is could it get dropped quickly? My colleague Kelly o' Donnell asked Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, how do you prove intent when you're dealing with a picture, which is part of the point that Ashley's making.
Khadija Goba
I think Republicans are going to have a hard time defending this and defending that this is a viable case that they should put energy in. And you'll see all of us on the Hill asking Republicans this week whether this is a viable case and should they pursue it. So it'll be, it's going to put Republicans, I think, in a really uncomfortable position to defend this.
Kristen Welker
Well, it's always that hallway interview that gets a little tricky.
Khadija Goba
Sure.
Kristen Welker
Thank you all so much for a great conversation. Khadija, Chuck and Ashley, we are back with more MEET THE Press now. There is much more ahead on NBC News.
Chuck Rocha
Now.
Etsy Advertiser
On Etsy, every sign of spring is a reason to celebrate. Welcome the warmer weather with a light linen jacket made by a real person or enjoy your morning coffee outdoors in a hand thrown mug. Refresh your style and your space with pieces you won't find anywhere else. Celebrate the new season season and original small shops on the Etsy app.
Host: Kristen Welker, NBC News
Date: April 29, 2026
This episode dives into the mounting domestic and geopolitical tensions shaping U.S. and global politics in April 2026. Host Kristen Welker leads coverage of the economic fallout from the conflict with Iran, contentious congressional hearings, Federal Reserve uncertainty, the sensational indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, and a Supreme Court ruling with sweeping electoral implications. The episode features prominent voices from the White House, Congress, the Federal Reserve, the field in Doha, and more.
"The economic outlook remains highly uncertain and the conflict in the Middle East has added to this uncertainty. In the near term, higher energy prices will push up overall inflation." — Jerome Powell (01:44)
"It's historic. I mean, this hasn't happened in like 80 years... There is a tradition that if you're the Fed chief, then you leave, even if there's more time left..." — Christine Romans (06:49)
Naval Blockade & Congressional Scrutiny (02:05–04:41)
"The blockade is genius, okay? The blockade has been 100% foolproof... There will never be a deal unless they agree that there will be no nuclear weapons." — Donald Trump (02:40)
"The biggest challenge, the biggest adversary we face at this point are the reckless, feckless, and defeatist words of congressional Democrats and some Republicans." — Pete Hegseth (03:31)
Questions about Military Success and Goals (04:23–09:28)
"They still have not told us what their overall goal is. They have not told us what the off ramp and the end game is, which is exactly why Americans don't support it." — Rep. Jason Crow (32:38)
White House Internal Debate (12:19–15:27)
Regional Implications & Blockade Impact (16:01–18:47)
"There is a real feeling among America's Arab allies here in the Gulf that they are just not in control of their own destiny. They are kind of at the mercy of the United States and Iran." — Raf Sanchez (16:18)
Details on the Case (20:39–26:09)
"86 is a mob term for kill them... People think of it as something having to do with disappearing, but the mob uses that term to say when they want to kill somebody." — Donald Trump (21:26)
"Every legal expert I've talked to... just don't see this case having any chance of success." — Ryan Reilly (25:03)
Political Commentary and Reaction
"This is another example of the Trump administration weaponizing Americans Department of Justice against Donald Trump's political enemies..." (26:50)
"Hopefully there's more to it than just the picture in the sand. Otherwise, I just think it's another example of where we're going to regret this because we're setting a fairly low bar." (28:59)
Ruling Overview (35:16–41:51)
"The court... made Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act a dead letter, effectively." — Lawrence Hurley (36:49)
Election & Political Fallout
"This ruling will have far, far-fetching effects both on these midterms... as well as in next year when you'll see just sort of an all-out new era of redistricting with very few rules and guardrails." (39:33)
FISA Section 702 Debate (43:29–48:54)
Dysfunction and Speaker Johnson’s Struggles (45:01–49:56)
"I think the speaker has done a really good job with the cards he's been dealt." — Ashley Davis (49:59)
Panel Discussion: Public Frustration & Election Impact (50:11–56:07)
"The American people feel... none of that... has anything to do with gas prices or... what the American people feel." — Chuck Rocha (50:40)
On the Iran Blockade's Impact
"The blockade has been 100% foolproof... There will never be a deal unless they agree that there will be no nuclear weapons."
— Donald Trump (02:40)
On Federal Reserve Independence
"These legal actions by the administration are unprecedented in our 113 year history. And there are ongoing threats of additional such actions... putting at risk the thing that really matters... the ability to conduct monetary policy without... political factors."
— Jerome Powell (07:08)
On Congressional Oversight of War
"He's also saying that we don't have the right as members of Congress to actually question wars and conflict. We just, you know, get in line... That's not our role."
— Rep. Jason Crow (31:11)
On the DOJ & Political Persecution
"Americans should be upset about this more than anybody else because it's their money and it's their prosecutors who are being used and abused for purposes that Donald Trump sees fit in any given day."
— Rep. Jason Crow (27:17)
On Erosion of Trust
"The Justice Department has been politicized for way too long, too long on both sides."
— Ashley Davis (54:21)
This episode underscores a time of acute national strain:
For listeners seeking clarity on a turbulent moment in U.S. politics, this episode of Meet the Press NOW provides a comprehensive, on-the-ground snapshot — from the halls of power to the war zone, the Supreme Court, and the streets where Americans feel the crisis most deeply.