
Rep. Suhas Subramanyam (D-Va.) says that Hillary Clinton has nothing to hide after the House Oversight Committee interviews the former secretary as part of its Jeffrey Epstein probe. The Department of Defense clashes with AI giant Anthropic over the use of artificial intelligence in the military. President Trump escalates pressure on Iran as peace talks continue abroad.
Loading summary
Kristen Welker
Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start. Thumbtack knows homes so you don't have to don't know the difference between matte paint, finish and satin or what that clunking sound from your dryer is. With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro, you just have to hire one. You can hire top rated pros, see price estimates and read reviews all on the app. Download today. Did you know 39% of teen drivers admit to texting while driving. Even scarier, those who text are more likely to speed and run red lights. Shockingly, 94% know it's dangerous, but do it anyway. As a parent, you can't always be in the car, but you can stay connected to their safety. With Greenlight Infinity's driving reports monitor their driving habits, see if they're using their phone, speeding and more. These reports provide real data for meaningful conversations about safety. Plus, with weekly updates, you can track their progress over time, help keep your teens safe. Sign up for Greenlight Infinity@Greenlight.com podcast.
Interviewer/Host
Welcome to MEET THE press.
Kristen Welker
Now.
Interviewer/Host
I'm Kristen Welker in Washington. We begin with breaking news amid new fallout tied to the Epstein files. Right now, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is behind closed doors near her home in Chappaqua, New York, for a deposition for the House Oversight Committee as part of its Epstein investigation, with committee members set to question former President Bill Clinton tomorrow. According to her opening statement, Secretary Clinton told lawmakers she could not recall ever meeting Mr. Epstein and that she had no new information for their investigation. She also accused Republicans of partisan political theater. Committee chair James Comer, speaking to reporters from Chappaqua, pushing back
Kristen Welker
Democrats voted to subpoena the Clintons. The Democrats voted with the Republicans to hold the Clintons in contempt. So the Democrats have just as many questions for their Clintons as the Republicans. So this isn't a partisan witch hunt. This was a motion, a bipartisan motion supported by the Democrats to bring the Clintons in. So I don't think it's any type of being unfair in any way to the Clintons.
Interviewer/Host
Now, as we just noted, former President Bill Clinton is slated to be deposed tomorrow for the first time a former president has ever been compelled to testify as part of a congressional investigation. And Democrats on the Oversight Committee say they're now setting their sights on the current president.
Kristen Welker
So we should be very clear that now that we're going to hear from former President Clinton, I hope that Chairman Comer and the Republicans will join us in demanding that the person who actually appears more times in the files than the former president who we want to speak with is President Donald Trump.
Interviewer/Host
Now, we should note that neither of the Clintons have been accused of any wrongdoing or charged in connection with the Epstein investigation. But this does all come amid new scrutiny over the Justice Department's compliance with the Epstein disclosure law. NBC News confirms the DOJ has not released some files related to a woman who had made an allegation against President Trump. The FBI conducted multiple interviews with that woman who accused Epstein of abusing her. A source familiar with the Justice Department's investigation tells NBC News she also made an additional allegation tied to Mr. Trump about an incident when she was 13 years old. The White House has pushed back against allegations raised against the president, saying the files contain, quote, untrue and sensationalist claims against him. NBC News chief Capitol Hill correspondent Ryan Nobles joins me from Chappaqua, along with NBC News White House correspondent Monica Alba. Thanks to both of you for starting us off. Ryan, I have to start with you. You are there outside this hearing. What has the reaction been so far from both Republicans and Democrats to today's deposition?
Kristen Welker
Well, we haven't heard from Republicans since the deposition began. At one point, they had promised us that they were going to come out each hour to update us on the progress of these talks, and they have not done that quite yet. But Democrats did come out about halfway through and said that Hillary Clinton has answered every single question, that she has not taken the Fifth, that she's explained different aspects of what the Republicans were asking, including, and most specifically that she had no ties to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell, that she did not know them and that she certainly knew nothing about their criminal activity. And one of the things that the Democrats really honed in on was this idea that it was all taking place behind closed doors. And they wanted to make it clear that this information, the entire video and transcript of this deposition be brought out into the public as soon as possible. Take a listen. The full transcript, unedited, of the secretary's questions, and the answers need to be released by the majority in the next 24 hours. We need the public and the American people have a right to know exactly what she said, what questions were asked of her and how she responded. That's transparency. We're hopeful that tomorrow for the former president that the press would be allowed in and the public as well. That's been the request. Now, there's no reason to think that wasn't going to happen. Already the Committee's had a pretty good track record of producing the entire video and transcripts of the depositions that they've conducted up until this point. But there was a little bit of a dust up today when Congresswoman Lauren Boebert covertly took a photo of the secretary before she began answering her questions and then sent it to a conservative influencer who then shared it all across the Internet. They paused the deposition for a minute to remind everyone as to what the rules were stated around this deposition. But Democrats are pointing out, why are you sending pictures of the secretary when we wanted the whole thing to be public? It just doesn't make any sense.
Interviewer/Host
Christine and Ryan, of course, we're anticipating former President Clinton will be deposed tomorrow. What are you expecting? Have you gotten any preview there?
Kristen Welker
So I do think that tomorrow's deposition will probably go much further in terms of the overall goal of this investigation, to learn as much as they possibly can about Jeffrey Epstein and the conspiracy associated with his criminal sex trafficking network, Hillary Clinton. There's just no evidence that she had any sort of relationship with Jeffrey Epstein or Glenn Maxwell. The same cannot be said for President Clinton. There is a long track record of information in the files that shows him with Jeffrey Epstein. He has written in his own memoir about his connections with Jeffrey Epstein and saying that he'd wish that he'd never met him and that he. He wished that he had not developed that relationship. What he's never answered, though, are substantive questions about that relationship. What kind of interactions did they have? Where did they meet? Where did they go? What did they do? Was it just a surface level relationship or was there more to it? I can bet that that's some of the things that both Republicans and Democrats will be pressing the president on tomorrow.
Interviewer/Host
Yeah, no doubt about that. All right, Ryan Nobles from Chappaqua, thank you so much for starting us off. Monica Alba, let me head over to you at the White House. What has the reaction been from the White House? We know that there's been an attempt, obviously, in the wake of the State of the Union to stay focused on issues like the economy. What's the strategy there? Absolutely, Kristen.
Kristen Welker
But I think in the words of
Interviewer/Host
a senior administration official some time ago,
Kristen Welker
since we've been talking about this issue overall for so long, this is the one that kind of hangs over the White House.
Interviewer/Host
That just doesn't go away.
Kristen Welker
And the president has been clear in
Interviewer/Host
the last couple of months that he
Kristen Welker
did push for that transparency.
Interviewer/Host
He signed that legislation into law to get the initial files out, and he
Kristen Welker
has continued and the White House has continued to point to that as evidence that the president supports more of this
Interviewer/Host
information to come out and to be released. But as we delve into these files
Kristen Welker
and as you mentioned, NBC's own reporting
Interviewer/Host
and confirmation of these, questions about what might still be withheld and has not
Kristen Welker
been released publicly that could be related
Interviewer/Host
to President Trump based on allegations from an Epstein victim.
Kristen Welker
That just again raises these questions for the White House once more.
Interviewer/Host
And they like to continue to point to and refer to a DOJ statement in which they say that this president,
Kristen Welker
in terms of information in the file,
Interviewer/Host
has been accused of things that have
Kristen Welker
not been true, that have not come true, and that have been just simply included in these files as sensationalist information.
Interviewer/Host
So they do continue to reiterate that the president hasn't been accused, accused of any wrongdoing when it comes to his
Kristen Welker
ties to Jeffrey Epstein. But again, this just does raise more questions, even though you're absolutely right to say this White House is focused on a complete different set of priorities and topics right now.
Interviewer/Host
Monica, let me ask you about this aspect of it. NBC News has confirmed the Justice Department has not released some of the files, particularly related to a woman who made allegations against President Trump. The president has denied any wrongdoing. But what's the White House saying about these specific files? Yeah, and they are really overall pointing
Kristen Welker
to what Attorney General Pam Bondi said
Interviewer/Host
some time ago, which is that all of the files that they plan to
Kristen Welker
release have been released.
Interviewer/Host
That is the Trump administration view of
Kristen Welker
this, and that if there's additional information out there, there was reason to withhold it. That needed to be part of that
Interviewer/Host
justification, either to protect the identity of somebody or because it included information that,
Kristen Welker
again, for whatever reason and determination, DOJ
Interviewer/Host
decided it shouldn't be made public. So this is a White House that is essentially trying to argue that this is case closed. But again, I think the public pressure
Kristen Welker
continues and the president is likely to
Interviewer/Host
face more questions about this in the days ahead. I think you're right about that, man. Let's shift gears for just a second. The Washington Post is reporting today that activists are coordinating with the White House on what they're describing as a draft executive order would effectively give the president authority over voting ahead of November's midterm elections. They're alleging that China intervened in the 2020 election. What are you hearing? What are your sources telling you about this effort? Well, the White House tells me that
Kristen Welker
essentially they are always in contact with outside groups, that they are always being
Interviewer/Host
presented with pitches or possibilities of things that could end up eventually becoming a
Kristen Welker
draft of an executive order.
Interviewer/Host
But that that is something that is not necessarily the case for this. Specifically, they did put out a statement
Kristen Welker
saying overall that the president is incredibly concerned about the status of elections and that is why he has continued to
Interviewer/Host
ask Congress and lawmakers to support the Save America Act. And he is still looking at other
Kristen Welker
possible reforms to election security. Though again, they wouldn't confirm necessarily that that specific 17 page executive order that the Washington Post reported on is actually being considered at this time.
Interviewer/Host
Kristen. All right, Monica Alba, thank you so much. We really appreciate it. Joining me now, Democratic Congressman Suha Subramaniam of Virginia. He's a member of the House Oversight Committee. Thank you so much for joining us. We really appreciate it. Congressman,
Kristen Welker
thank you for having me.
Interviewer/Host
So you were in the room. What are your biggest takeaways so far from the deposition of Secretary Hillary Clinton?
Kristen Welker
Well, my biggest takeaway is she shouldn't be deposed. I mean, there's really not much information that she could provide us. Certainly, you know, we're happy to talk to anyone who has information about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghilaine Maxwell, but she certainly seems to not have much information to provide us. And it's very interesting to see that, you know, Les Wexner, who bankrolled Jeffrey Epstein for many, many years, when we had a deposition of him in Ohio, zero Republicans showed up. Yet here they are. There's about 10 or 11 Republicans here to depose Hillary Clinton. It just shows the partisan nature from their end on this investigation. But we're going to continue to investigate and make it nonpartisan on the Democratic
Interviewer/Host
side very quickly because Secretary Clinton in her opening statement said she doesn't recall ever meeting Jeffrey Epstein. Did she affirm that under oath during the deposition?
Kristen Welker
You know, one thing I would really like is for the transcript to be released within the next 24 hours. We're technically not supposed to say anything specific from what happened, but I would say that when the transcript is released, we will see a lot of people be surprised by how good Secretary Clinton was as well as how embarrassing it was for Republicans to try to figure out how to corner her. And yet she ran circles around them today. And so I think we're going to ask for that transcript to be released so that the American people can see that Republicans were, you know, staking their claim or trying to make this partisan try to say that this is a Democratic hoax and blame Democrats when it really was not.
Interviewer/Host
And I know you're criticizing Republicans for focusing on Hillary Clinton but three Democrats on your committee did vote to hold her in in contempt for initially refusing to testify if she had nothing to say. Why do you think they voted to hold her in contempt?
Kristen Welker
Well, I think they wanted to be consistent with the fact that we don't want people evading our committee. I would say that, you know, the Clintons, you know, did eventually show up and we did make this happen. So they are here now. They're answering questions. But certainly we don't want our committee to be, you know, run over. This administration has done that the most. We also in that same vote tried to hold Pam Bondi in criminal contempt. But the reality was this Republican majority didn't want to do that. But, you know, Pam Bondi and Donald Trump and others in this administration continue to withhold two and a half million files and that's what makes it difficult to do this investigation.
Interviewer/Host
And I know you can't provide specifics, but broadly speaking, did Secretary Clinton give any insight into her husband's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein or any new details in that regard?
Kristen Welker
I think we're going to find out more about what President Clinton has to say tomorrow and his involvement. And, you know, that's why he's here. And certainly I think there'll be more members of our committee here tomorrow because they're very interested in his testimony.
Interviewer/Host
Let me ask you, because Congressman Robert Garcia has said this now sets a precedent for the committee speaking to President Trump potentially, who's also, of course, been named in the Epstein files. Do you think that that is something the Democrats will continue to press for? He has denied any wrongdoing.
Kristen Welker
I think this again, if they're going to bring in former President Clinton who has been seen in the files a fraction of the amount of times as President Trump, we should be bringing in President Trump and we should be bringing him in now if we want answers about his involvement and why he refuses to release all of the files. He's the best person to talk to. Right. And so we should get past just press gaggles and one off answers and get him in our committee telling us what's going on. I would absolutely support that.
Interviewer/Host
Let me ask you, because House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer has said that he's looking into reports that have been confirmed by NBC News that the Justice Department and its release of the Epstein documents omitted files related to a woman who made allegations against President Trump. What can you tell us about that specifically and how seriously is the committee looking into those files?
Kristen Welker
Well, of the files that were released, there were allegations made about President Trump. Some of those were taken down quickly after they were discovered. But we know from what we have that there are missing parts of these documents that have not been released. And so we have a lot of questions about where those pages are, where those documents are. They're clearly part of the two and a half million that weren't released, as well as many other victim statements, too, that, you know, we believe name President Trump. And certainly we're not saying that, you know, he is guilty of any allegations. But we want all the evidence and we want the evidence about all the people who are involved in these crimes. But to do that, you really have to get all the files and get all the evidence to us so we can do our investigation. And certainly the American people want that transparency, too.
Interviewer/Host
Well, we'll be tracking tomorrow's developments closely as well. Congressman Subramaniam, thank you so much for your perspective. We really appreciate it.
Kristen Welker
Thank you.
Interviewer/Host
Coming up, the very latest on US Tensions with Cuba as Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the administration is investigating an incident that Havana is calling a quote, foiled armed infiltration into its country involving an American boat. But first, a special programming announcement. Tune in this Tuesday for NBC News. Now special coverage of the first major primaries of the 2026 midterm elections will be live all night long as the results come in starting at 8pm Eastern. We'll be right back with more Meet the Press. Now stay with us.
Kristen Welker
The world of business is constantly evolving. And Comcast business keeps you totally in step with secure AI backed networking in more than 100 countries. They're powering over 90% of the Fortune 500 and millions of small businesses. That's a lot of muscle. And behind it all, thousands of experts answering your call at 2:00am like it's 2:00pm one partner powering how business gets done for companies around the globe. When you add it all up, no one does business like Comcast Business. Did you know 39% of teen drivers admit to texting while driving? Even scarier, those who text are more likely to speed and run red lights. Shockingly, 94% know it's dangerous, but do it anyway. As a parent, you can't always be in the car, but you can stay connected to their safety. With Greenlight. Infinity's driving reports, monitor their driving habits, see if they're using their phone, speeding and more. These reports provide real data for meaningful conversations about safety. Plus, with weekly updates, you can track their progress over time, help keep your teens safe. Sign up for Greenlight Infinity@Greenlight.com podcast avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start. Thumbtack knows homes so you don't have to don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin or what that clunking sound from your dryer is. With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro, you just have to hire one. You can hire top rated pros, see price estimates and read reviews all on the app. Download today.
Interviewer/Host
Welcome back. We are learning new details about that deadly firefight off the coast of Cuba in which four people aboard a Florida registered Spirit were killed by the Cuban military. Now, Cuba says the speedboat was carrying Cuban residents of the United States who were armed and trying to infiltrate Cuba for, quote, terrorist purposes. Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the US Is carrying out its own investigation into the incident that will determine the administration's response.
Kristen Welker
I'm not going to speculate on what the US Will do. What I'm telling you is that we're going to find out exactly what happened and who was involved and then we'll make a determination on the basis of what we find out. And we are going to find out, but we're not going to just take what somebody else tells us.
Interviewer/Host
Joining me now is NBC News correspondent Ed Augustin in Cuba and Will Freeman, a fellow for Latin American studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. Thank you both so much for being here. Ed, let me start with you and get you to respond to what Cuba is saying. Cuba's deputy foreign minister just held a press conference. What exactly are they saying?
Kristen Welker
Well, I'm here in the same building. The press conference took place about 20 minutes ago and the deputy foreign minister laid out the facts as Cuba says they are. He says that they have recovered from that speedboat panoply of weapons, assault rifles, night vision goggles, camouflage equipment, which furthers his case. He would argue that this was not to do with human trafficking, it wasn't to do with drug trafficking, both of which have happened in these waters in recent years. He would say that this furthers his case that this was armed people. Secondly, he pointed out a fact, and this is a fact as we've had enough history and investigation to know it. He said that Cuba has been a victim of terrorism emanating from the United States, both organized by and financed by the United States, and that really that's his opinion. I think you've also got to say it's academic consensus. Now, if you look at things like Bay of Pigs a long time ago in 1961 that was organized and financed by the CIA, by the US state, and it was a paramilitary invasion. You can argue it was a liberation, but it was actually a paramilitary invasion. In the 1970s, coming from Miami, you had Orlando Borsch, who was the intellectual architect and the CIA knew about this beforehand, of blowing up a civilian airliner that killed over 70 people. He was given a presidential pardon by the first Bush president and died peacefully in his home in Miami in his 80s. And more recently, most people wouldn't say this is terrorism, but in 2020, a man fired a weapon, a gun, a rifle, at the Cuban Embassy in Washington. And two years ago, no charges were pressed. So it is undoubtedly true that there is a line running through this, that a lot of violence has come out of Florida historically, and there hasn't been much accountability. And he pointed to that. The most important thing he said, though, was that the Cuban authorities are talking to the American authorities, both to the Coast Guard, which perhaps isn't too surprising because the Coast Guard, anyone who knows Cuba knows the two Coast Guards have a highly functional relationship and talk a lot, but also said that they're talking to the State Department. And in this wider conversation, the media are having speculation. Is it true that the two governments are negotiating or not? That's got to be an important thing.
Interviewer/Host
Well, let me turn to you and get your take. I mean, this is such an extraordinary incident. And the Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, called it, quote, highly unusual. Cuba's foreign minister saying Cuba hasn't had to face. Has had to face, I'm sorry, numerous infiltrations since 1959. Part of what Ed's just laying out. Put this into broader context for us.
Kristen Welker
Well, it comes at a moment of extreme uncertainty, I'd say, for the future of the authoritarian regime on the island. Of course, it's persisted a long time, you know, through a lot of other crises, when people thought that it might finally collapse. But the current moment is really unprecedented. I mean, I just want to underscore a few figures. One, tourism down over 70% since 2018. The military and other authorities that rule the island had transformed the economy to revolve around tourism. Okay, so that leg is knocked out from under the table. You also have 10 to 20% of Cubans who've left the island since 2021, mostly young people fleeing, searching, both fleeing political repression and looking for opportunities elsewhere. So this is a regime that's completely gutted of legitimacy. It's no longer able, even able to claim credit for functional hospitals or low crime rates. Those are going up as well. It's a regime in absolute crisis, and that has only deepened since the Trump administration cut off the flow of oil from Venezuela, which had been essential keeping the lights on. So the Trump administration has Cuba in this position of, you know, I think, immense precarity and vulnerability, the regime that is. And allegedly, there are these talks going on now. Of course, the Cubans disavow those. The Trump administration hasn't provided much details, but what we believe is that the Trump administration is speaking potentially to a grandson of Raul Castro about some kind of negotiated opening, at least on the economic front, to. To reactivate the economy and probably bring in US Investment. So when I saw this episode happen, the first question for me was, if those talks are indeed going on, what does this mean for them? Does it derail them? Does it empower hardliners on the Cuban side who, some of whom may not want to see this kind of negotiation go forward? Does it empower certain hardliners on the US Side who maybe also feel threatened by it? I think that's what we'll see soon. But my read on Secretary of State Rubio's comments is that he's trying to keep a calm tone for now first, figure out what happened before jumping to conclusions.
Interviewer/Host
Well, will you take me to my next question, which is I do want to play some of what President Trump has had to say about Cuba, about those talks. Get both of your reactions on the other side. Take a listen.
Kristen Welker
Cuba is right now a failed nation. They don't even have jet fuel to get for airplanes to take off. They're clogging up their Runway. We're talking to Cuba right now. I have Marco Rubio talking to Cuba right now, and they should absolutely make a deal because it's a humanitarian. It's really a humanitarian threat.
Interviewer/Host
Will, let me start with you. What do you make of what you heard from the president?
Kristen Welker
Fairly straightforward description of the facts. It is a humanitarian crisis. There'd be no other reason that 1 to 2 million of 10 million people would have left in the last few years if that wasn't true. And I certainly do hope that there's a deal struck. I think the protests of 2021, unprecedented tens, if not hundreds of thousands of Cubans out on the street. I mean, it really showed you that there is mass discontent coupled with this mass exodus of people. There is, you know, a pressure for political change of some kind. Obviously needs to include a number of stakeholders on the island. But, you know, I think that's a. It's a pretty fair description of where Cuba is now. Obviously a very uncertain path ahead, but I think it's, it's pretty much on the money.
Interviewer/Host
Ed, let me give you the final word here. What more are you learning about the people on that and what are you watching for next in this investigation?
Kristen Welker
Well, it's been fascinating to report on the people on the boat. I Woke up at 5:30 this morning and I was listening to Radio Marti, which is a US Government financed propaganda outlet. And one of the people on that boat did an interview last year backing President Trump, saying that the regime is about to fall, saying that Cubans need to do everything possible to make the regime a fall. Clearly a very political person. Two of the people that were on that boat are on a list published by the Ministry of Interiors who claim they've been involved in sabotage. So far, so, so far, an AP came out with a story yesterday in which they interviewed the brother of one of the people on the boat who died, saying that he got caught up in a diabolical quest, an obsessive quest to overthrow the government. Now these are very anti government people, but it's clear that they are political people and they have been accused by the Cuban government for many years, at least two of them, for being involved in trying to overthrow the government. And so that would seem that there's circumstantial evidence to back up the Cuban government's narrative that this was indeed that these were political people.
Interviewer/Host
All right, Ed Augustin, Will Freeman, thank you so much for joining us on this still developing story. We really appreciate it. Coming up next, inside today's high stakes talks between top US And Iranian negotiators over Tehran's nuclear program in what could be a final push for a diplomatic solution as the president weighs military action in Iran. Stay with us on MEET THE press. Now,
Kristen Welker
Did you know 39% of teen drivers admit to texting while driving? Even scarier, those who text are more likely to speed and run red lights. Shockingly, 94% know it's dangerous, but do it anyway. As a parent, you can't always be in the car, but you can stay connected to their safety with Greenlight. Infinity's driving reports. Monitor their driving habits, see if they're using their phone, speeding and more. These reports provide real data for meaningful conversations about safety. Plus, with weekly updates, you can track their progress over time, help keep your teens safe. Sign up for Greenlight Infinity@Greenlight.com podcast Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start. Thumbtack knows homes so you don't have to don't know the difference between matte, paint, finish and satin or what that clunking sound from your dryer is with thumbtack. You don't have to be a home pro, you just have to hire one. You can hire top rated pros, see price estimates and read reviews all on the app. Download Today.
Interviewer/Host
Welcome back. The U.S. and Iran are holding their latest round of talks in hopes of reaching an agreement to rein in Tehran's nuclear program. US Special envoy Steve Witkoff and the president's son in law, Jared Kushner are in Geneva today for indirect talks with Iran's foreign minister. Sources telling NBC News the Trump administration viewed today's discussions as positive and Iran's foreign minister saying they were the most serious and longest so far. Also saying, quote, good progress was made on the issues of Iran's nuclear program and sanctions relief. But it comes as questions continue to swirl about possible US Military strikes on Iran after President Trump's State of the Union address where he claimed Iran is working on a missile that could reach the US Was trying to restart its nuclear program despite claiming last summer the US had obliterated Iran's nuclear program. Joining me now is NBC News chief international correspondent Kier Simmons. Kier, thanks so much for being here. So significant these talks were underway. Give us the very latest. What are you hearing was achieved?
Kristen Welker
Well, fascinating, Christine, that two U.S. officials tell NBC News that one word that you just described just positive about these talks that have now wrapped up. They did take hours. The foreign minister of Iran, Abbas Arabchi, on the other hand, more, more positive if you like, because speaking more about it on Iranian television saying understandings have been reached on some issues and on others there are still differences, saying that the Iranian side presented Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff with their expectations on sanctions relief and that there will be more talks next week. That message reinforced by Oman's foreign minister who is mediating these talks, saying there's been significant progress and that they will resume after consultation in their respective capitals. An interesting point here, Kristen. The foreign minister of man said exactly that in May 2025 after talks between the US and Iran. And then Israel launched its 12 day war. And then of course, there was Operation Midnight Hammer against the Iranian against the Iranian nuclear program by President Trump. So just because these positive messages are emerging from these talks today, it doesn't mean necessarily that these threats that President Trump has been posing won't come to fruition. And just a data point on that, the USS Ford the biggest aircraft carrier in the world left Crete today, heading towards the eastern Mediterranean. And so it will be the second aircraft carrier in this region if President Trump decides to carry out those strikes against Iran.
Interviewer/Host
So here, if the president were to carry out strikes against Iran in the coming days, what would the implications be? Would that affect effectively put an end to these talks?
Kristen Welker
Well, you'd have to think so. It did when Israel launched its 12 day war in 2025. They've talked about technical talks in Vienna next week. Again, it's hard to see how those could continue if, say, for example, those strikes happened this weekend. Ultimately, President Trump has the capability now to strike Iran, but it's not that he has to do it at any particular time. It does cost a lot of money to keep so much firepower in this region. But that I suspect won't weigh too much on President Trump's mind and what will be concerning him. And we know that these conversations are happening in the White House are the questions of what happens after those strikes. If you carry out regime change, do the more hardline leaders impose themselves in Iran? Do you end up supporting the Iranian protesters by doing that? Or even does Iran collapse and then cause all kinds of issues in this region for a long time? Could it even explode into a war? I mean, these are all the kinds of things that any president, even President Trump, will be trying to weigh up in deciding what to do at this stage.
Interviewer/Host
Yeah. And the regime change in Iran, undoubtedly far more complicated than in Venezuela, as we just witnessed. All right, Keir Simmons, thank you so much. We know you've been following every twist and turn of these talks. Really appreciate it. We do want to turn now to the ongoing search for Nancy Guthrie, of course, the 84 year old mother of our beloved colleague Savannah Guthrie. 26 days into the investigation, two federal law enforcement sources tell NBC News officials are now working to return Nancy Guthrie's home back to her family. Several agents were seen at the property Wednesday as part of that plan, according to the sources. Officials also acknowledge law enforcement no longer sees a need to seal the home as a crime scene. The FBI tip line has received more than 23,000 calls since Guthrie was taken. 750 of those came in on Tuesday in the first 12 hours after Savannah and her family offered a private $1 million reward for the return of their mother. If you or anyone, you know, anyone has more information, we encourage you to call the tip line. Please, if you know anything, call this number on your screen. 1-800- call FBI. Again, that's 1-800- call FBI. Coming up after the break, the Pentagon battles with AI powerhouse Anthropic, demanding it allow the US military to use the AI technology without guardrails. That story's next on MEET THE PRESS now. Welcome back. Turning now to a story that has thrust an uncomfortable question into the spotlight. What happens when you combine artificial intelligence with deadly weapons? For weeks, tensions have been brewing between the Pentagon and AI giant Anthropic. And now the Defense Department is giving the AI company an ultimatum. Let the military use its technology without restrictions or pay the price starting tomorrow. The dispute centers around Anthropics demands that any military use of its AI must come with significant guardrails to prevent the powerful technology from being used to make lethal automaton autonomous weapons or for the surveillance of Americans. But during a tense meeting earlier this week, Pentagon leadership gave Anthropic a final warning to drop their demands for guardrails by 5pm tomorrow. That's according. According to a senior Pentagon official. If it doesn't, the Pentagon is threatening retaliation either by invoking the Defense Production act to force Anthropic to comply or threatening to cancel its $200 million contract and label Anthropic a supply chain risk, a designation often reserved for companies with ties to foreign adversaries that pose a national security risk. Joining me now is Jacob Ward, veteran technology journalist and host of the Rip Current podcast. Jacob, thanks so much for being here. So let's dive right in. What do you make of this standoff between Anthropolog? How do you see it going?
Kristen Welker
Well, it's a very new thing in my world. Generally speaking, when I interview tech CEOs at companies that have business with the government, they tend to say, you know, how this stuff is used. And the ethical questions that come up around it are not my job. I've often asked them things like, well, the technology you've created, you know, very often you're seeing a company that has like a border patrol drone with a facial recognition camera stuff that is so far outside the bounds of even the Geneva Convention. You say, well, shouldn't you have to invent the ethics to go with the technology you've invented? And they say, that's not my job. Anthropic is one of the very rare companies that actually has taken a stand on this internally in the way that so many people have suggested these companies should. And that's because they're living in the future. They know what is capable, what, what AI is capable of producing in terms of surveillance and in terms of military applications. And that's why they have these policies that, quote, don't allow the company to track a person's physical location, emotional state or communic without their consent. You're not allowed to use AI to, quote, produce, modify design or illegally acquire weapons. I mean, these are some very fundamental standards they've tried to impose. And in the past, Kristen, it's been government use of this stuff that has imposed restraints, right? Democracy has imposed restraints on these companies. But now we're seeing the opposite. We don't live in that world anymore. Suddenly this company, which has its own set of standards, turns out to have higher standards perhaps than the Pentagon does. And now we're in this strange standoff truly in the Upside down here, Krist.
Interviewer/Host
Just fascinating. And look, Anthropic saying one of the guardrails at once is barring the use of lethal autonomous weapons. What exactly does that mean? What would that kind of weapon look like? Jacob?
Kristen Welker
Well, we already have seen it. This is the thing to understand. This is not imaginary stuff. This is currently happening. So a company called Oterion, which is a Arlington, Virginia based company, just recently did a demonstration of multiple drones, multiple fixed wing aircraft, all controlled by a single system. Even though all of these pieces were made by different companies. Basically, you buy these things off the shelf, you put them under AI control and it can go kill someone for you without a human ever having to be consulted. The human doesn't have to pull the trigger anymore. So we're already in a world in which the role of a human has been downgraded from being the one that decides to yes, you should kill someone to really someone who decides, am I going to get in the way or let this thing go ahead and do its job and kill people automatically? That's the sort of thing that we're talking about. And that's not even taking into account, Christian, the long list of things. I have a whole piece up at the rip current about this where you have, you know, wi fi Systems now where three $30 routers can be used to identify who's in the room and where they are through a wall or in perfect pitch blackness, right? You have all, all sorts of AI capabilities that were in unimaginable five years ago that make the possibility of very scary, very real surveillance, identifying people by their heartbeat, how they walk, reading their lips through a mask. All of that is possible with AI. This is the world that Anthropic realizes they are playing in. And this seems to be why they're trying to impose some restrictions here and why The Pentagon, of course, wants every possible capability that they can get out of this technology.
Interviewer/Host
So, Jacob, who do you think right now has more leverage in this standoff?
Kristen Welker
That is a great question. So, right as. As of now, Anthropic is the only one of these companies that is allowed into the classified military systems. So they're the only ones that have gotten to this highest designation under the terms of their $200 million contract. And so the Pentagon basically has said, you've had them. They've told Axios and others. We're dealing with these guys because they're so good. Right. The technology is so effective. So that's the Pentagon feeling that they need these folks. Now, then, Anthropic, they also need this. I mean, a government contract is a very valuable, stable source of revenue for a company that's, you know, worth $380 billion, just raised about $30 billion this year, but as a result, owes a lot of money to its investors. And so there's a real standoff here. And it's not clear to me, you know, you really have the. The creator of this company, Dario Amadai, in a real pickle. He, I think, has some leverage, but I think, in theory, this is the real problem for him. Xai Alphabet, Google System, Gemini and Meta are also in line behind Anthropic for those sorts of contracts. And so this comes back to that same thing that drives tech people all the time is if I don't do it, someone else is, so I might as well do it. There's a lot of people lined up behind him to do that. This. Kristen.
Interviewer/Host
All right, well, we'll be watching closely to see what happens in the next 24 hours and beyond with Anthropic. Jacob Ward, thank you so much. We really appreciate all of your insights and information. Well, as the Trump administration embraces the use of AI, at least one prominent Republican is actually backing away. Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis has voiced concerns about the rapid expansion of AI, a position that puts him in sharp contrast with the Trump administration and therefore at odds with two potential 2028 presidential candidates, Vice President J.D. vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. As the term limited governor weighs another presidential run. Here's Governor DeSantis at an AI roundtable earlier this month. We have a responsibility to create a
Kristen Welker
framework so that this technology and technological innovations are channeled in a way that benefits the people of the state, benefits our kids, our parents, enhances our experience as human beings, not supplant our experience as human beings.
Interviewer/Host
Joining me now is senior national politics reporter Matt Dixon. Matt, thanks so much for being here.
Kristen Welker
Of course. Thanks for having me.
Interviewer/Host
So let's start off with what Ron DeSantis is up to. Why is he taking this stance and
Kristen Welker
what is his argument so functionally from the AI skeptic standpoint? Republicans or really polit politicians across the board talk about a couple of things, job loss, they talk about environmental concerns, broader societal impact, children that could be impacted by so called chat bots. We have seen there's been reporting about kids who have harmed themselves interacting with AI And Fernanda Santos that the Florida governor, he sort of checks all those boxes. He has come out of the gate swinging and it's a relatively new issue. He ran for president of folks who recall in 2024 it didn't go well. This really wasn't an issue for him or anyone. But in recent months, he has really come out swinging on all of the major bullet points that you would expect a skeptical politician to hit.
Interviewer/Host
So is this about him carving out ELAINE Potentially in 2028?
Kristen Welker
Two things I think. One, he's always tried to tap in a little bit to the populist strain he is in the past. His administration has sued social media companies. He's always been a little bit of a tech skeptic. But yes, of course, Ron DeSantis is a savvy politician who is 2024 running, ran into the Trump Buzzsaw, did not do well. I think he would like to run again right now. We have JD Vance, we have Marco Rubio as sort of the frontrunners. They're very Pro I Ron DeSantis, he's an opportunity.
Interviewer/Host
He sees the lane.
Kristen Welker
It's good politics, but I think it also leans a little bit to his policy instinct as well.
Interviewer/Host
All right, Matt Dixon, thanks so much.
Kristen Welker
Thank you.
Interviewer/Host
Great to have you here. Well, we're going to dig deeper into the brave new politics of AI with our panel after a quick break. This is MEET THE PRESS now. Welcome back. President Trump has repeatedly called for more federal control over elections, saying his party should, quote, nationalize the voting and making false claims about corrupt elections in major Democratic cities. And as we mentioned now, there is new reporting from the Washington Post which suggests pro Trump activists are circulating a draft executive order that, quote, claims China interfered in the 2020 election as a basis to declare a national emergency that would unlock extraordinary presidential power over voting. Joining me now is our panel, Susan Page, Washington bureau chief for USA Today, Democratic strategist Amisha Cross and Tiffany Smiley, founder of the Endeavor Pack. Thanks to all of you for being here, really appreciate it. Susan, let me start with you. What do you make of this panel? Where do you see this going?
Kristen Welker
Well, there have been allegations of Chinese involvement, but the study that the administration did before concluded that they didn't do it. They thought Chinese thought about trying to meddle in the election, but did not do so. This is something President Trump has been talking about since the prospects of big losses in November have raised. He said he'll accept the returns basically if I think they're fair. He's sowing the kind of questions about the sanctity of the election that he did about his 2020 election, which you'll recall, no evidence of fraud in that election, but he continues to talk about how he should have won.
Interviewer/Host
Tiffany, does the White House, do these pro Trump groups risk potentially dampening voter turnout, the voters that they need in the midterms by talking about this potential influence in the election, which, as Susan is laying out, was deemed not to have happened?
Kristen Welker
I think voter turnout for years now has dampened because there is a lack of trust in our voting system. There are some states you really don't even need to have an ID to vote in in the election. And that's a problem.
Interviewer/Host
And so I like to look to
Kristen Welker
and focus on the Save America act, which is widely popular. It polls at about 80% with the American people. People need to know in this country that it's, it's that they have confidence in the voting system, that it's, it's easy to vote when it's hard to cheat. We know that fraud does occur in my home state of Washington State. It's mail in ballots. Even in hometown. There was an apartment manager who was filling in names on extra ballots. So we know what happens.
Interviewer/Host
Pick up on that point. I mean, what do you see as the chances of the Save America act getting any type of bipartisan support? Do you think that's something that will happen? Is it something that Democrats are going to continue to run against?
Kristen Welker
Democrats are going to continue to run
Interviewer/Host
against it for good reason.
Kristen Welker
It creates trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist. Fraud in elections is less than 2%. The bigger issue is getting people who are registered to regularly show up to vote, not preventing people who shouldn't be voting from voting. But beyond that, I think that it is also an association with name. We know there have been several comments
Interviewer/Host
put out about how women who are
Kristen Welker
married may not have access because their last name changed. That is not true. And what we do know, what we do know is that this administration, as well as those of his acolytes in his version of justice space are individuals who are doing everything they can to dismantle our election cycle.
Interviewer/Host
They want to ensure that they limit votes because they do not want to
Kristen Welker
address why his poll numbers are what they are.
Interviewer/Host
They do not want to talk about the economy.
Kristen Welker
They specifically don't want to talk about affordability.
Interviewer/Host
And they have failed to reach where
Kristen Welker
Americans are in terms of moving America forward. He said America first, and he's everywhere
Interviewer/Host
and doing everything except right here and
Kristen Welker
protecting the Americans who are calling for affordability in housing, in food, you name it. That's what they're going to be taking to the ballot in November. He doesn't have an answer for it, so he just wants to stop them from coming.
Interviewer/Host
Tiffany, I assume you want to respond to that. Yeah.
Kristen Welker
No, that's not true. The economy is actually. There are really good things happening in the economy. And Trump is already out in Texas. The vice president is in Wisconsin making their case to the American people. And two things can be true at the same time. There are things trending in the right direction, and there is still work to be done. They were handed an economy that was not working. We were handed the highest inflation in my lifetime. And Trump has worked hard over this last year implementing his policies. The no Tax on TIPS act this summer that he passed and a tariff
Interviewer/Host
strategy that actually raised prices.
Kristen Welker
They will start to fill that. But two things can be true at the same time. Americans need to believe in our voting system and have confidence in it. And Save America act is widely popular. Trump is not doing that as a distraction. He's simply doing that to stand up for the American people. Mom. Donnie, in New York, you need to show two forms of identification to shovel snow. So certainly we can figure that out in our voting system.
Interviewer/Host
Well, it is important to note that instances of fraud are incredibly low, but it does come against the backdrop of the midterms getting underway. We're going to have our first results on Tuesday. Susan Page. President Trump, as Tiffany says, is heading to Texas. He has not endorsed in that primary race. Senator John Cornyn, in the political fight of his life. He hasn't endorsed yet. Set the stage for us in the wake of the State of the Union, where the president did talk about the economy, a range of other issues at this moment. What are you watching for?
Kristen Welker
So he did talk about the economy, and that was of some relief to congressional Republicans who were actually being on
Interviewer/Host
the ballot in November. But he continued to mock the idea of affordability. And as though that's not a legitimate
Kristen Welker
concern for Americans to have, although they do have it.
Interviewer/Host
And he didn't do the, you know
Kristen Welker
that I feel your pain kind of moment that politicians do that says, I realize there are some things are hard for you. I'm going to try to do something about it.
Interviewer/Host
He followed instead the idea that the economy is great.
Kristen Welker
I have solved big problems since I took over a year ago.
Interviewer/Host
Tiffany, was that a I want to look forward, but I do think it's a critical point. We didn't hear that ignited acknowledgement that if you look at the polls, he's underwater in his handling of the economy. Many Americans still feel as though the economy's not working for them. Does he need to start doing that when he goes to Texas, for example? Well, when you pull the Democrats in
Kristen Welker
the economy, it's not any better. So I think his job is to build the confidence in the American people and to sell his message, make his case across the country and make sure that those running in the midterm are selling it as well. The fact is he has done really good things, things. Gas prices are down. 30 year mortgage interest rate just dropped. The Dow is at record highs. So there's good things that are happening and trending in the right direction. And once his policies take root, the American people in April are going to start to get their tax returns back and see more money in their pockets.
Interviewer/Host
Amisha, what about this argument that when you look at the polls by a narrow margin, actually fewer people have confidence in Democrats to address some of these pressing issues? How do Democrats address that in the midterms and as they start to make their case?
Kristen Welker
No, absolutely.
Interviewer/Host
Democrats have a hard hill to climb and in part because of the failures of the last presidential cycle, but also because they are still working on a
Kristen Welker
messaging strategy that makes sense for them.
Interviewer/Host
We saw the win with Mandani. We've seen Spamberger, we've seen cases across the country where it is, it has sailed. But by and large, Americans writ large
Kristen Welker
still want a fighter.
Interviewer/Host
Undecided voters are still trying to figure out where Democrats stand on certain issues.
Kristen Welker
And they have to not only fight against, you know, the treacherousness of this
Interviewer/Host
current administration, but they also have to have a path forward.
Kristen Welker
It's not just good enough to talk about affordability without having a plan of
Interviewer/Host
action to reduce those prices.
Kristen Welker
That issue is not going to go
Interviewer/Host
away anytime too soon. You know, it's certainly true that the
Kristen Welker
Democrats do not have any more faith from American voters than Republicans do, but it doesn't matter because midterm elections are referendum on the party in power and that's Republicans. I interviewed Nancy Pelosi yesterday who's a well known counter of elections and votes and she said that she predicted that Republicans would not only flip the three seats they need to get control of the House. She said they might win 30 seats.
Interviewer/Host
Are you bracing for that, that Democrats could potentially have wave as Nancy?
Kristen Welker
Well, history certainly predicts that, you know, so but that's not to say that the Republicans don't have this historic moment, this unique moment in time where they can make their pitch to the American people. As I mentioned, Trump's policies are taking effect. So, you know, I think the numbers we are seeing, we will see a significant shift in the coming months. And the Democrats message is just simply if Donald Trump is for it, we are against it. It's been like that from the very beginning.
Interviewer/Host
I mean, should he took office and I'm sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt you. Misha. There is this debate inside the Democratic Party. What exactly should the message be on the economy? We're going to see primary results in Texas on Tuesday, for example. You have James Talarico, you have Jasmine Crockett. Now, actually, they're not that different in their messaging. They're more different when it comes to their style. But what do you think Democrats should be leaning into the kitchen table issues that matter the most to Americans?
Kristen Welker
You are right.
Interviewer/Host
Mortgage prices are going down, but the average American can't afford a house. Hundreds of thousands of people are losing
Kristen Welker
jobs in the private sector.
Interviewer/Host
We already know that this president cut
Kristen Welker
the federal federal workers by the thousands as well.
Interviewer/Host
We know that AI is coming fast and furious and there are a ton of people who are currently unemployed.
Kristen Welker
So when you're talking about that and
Interviewer/Host
you're talking about gig economy work where people cannot afford not only the cost
Kristen Welker
of eggs, they can't afford to put
Interviewer/Host
a roof over their heads.
Kristen Welker
Democrats have to stay within that lane
Interviewer/Host
because that's where Americans are. Guys, we're out of time. Thank you so much, Susan, Amisha and Tiffany really appreciate it. We're back tomorrow with more MEET the press. Now there's more ahead on NBC News. Now
Kristen Welker
did you know that parents rank financial literacy as the number one most difficult life skill to teach? Meet Greenlight, the debit card and money app for families. With greenlight, you can set up chores automate allowance and keep an eye on your kids spending with real time notifications, kids learn to earn, save and spend wisely. And parents can rest easy knowing their kids are learning about money with guardrails in place. Sign up for Greenlight today@Greenlight.com podcast.
Host: Kristen Welker, NBC News
Episode Theme:
This episode centers on several breaking and developing stories shaping US politics: the high-profile congressional depositions of Hillary and Bill Clinton as part of the expanded Epstein investigation; new scrutiny of the Justice Department’s Epstein file disclosures, particularly those implicating former President Trump; tensions between the US and Cuba following a deadly maritime event and ongoing diplomatic discussions; a Pentagon standoff with AI powerhouse Anthropic over military use of artificial intelligence; and the brewing political battle over federal control of elections and AI regulation ahead of a key midterm primary cycle.
“According to her opening statement, Secretary Clinton told lawmakers she could not recall ever meeting Mr. Epstein and that she had no new information for their investigation. She also accused Republicans of partisan political theater.”
— Kristen Welker [01:21]
“The Democrats voted with the Republicans to hold the Clintons in contempt. So... this isn’t a partisan witch hunt.”
— James Comer (via report) [01:45]
“What he’s never answered, though, are substantive questions about that relationship... Was it just a surface-level relationship or was there more to it?”
— Ryan Nobles [06:05]
“They like to continue to point to and refer to a DOJ statement in which they say that this president... has been accused of things that have not been true... included in these files as sensationalist information.”
— Monica Alba [08:19]
On Clinton’s Testimony:
On Transcript Release:
On Calls for Trump’s Testimony:
On Missing DOJ Files:
“Cuba is right now a failed nation... They should absolutely make a deal because it's really a humanitarian threat.”
— Donald Trump [24:40]
“We already have seen it...You buy these things off the shelf, you put them under AI control and it can go kill someone…without a human ever having to be consulted.”
— Jacob Ward [37:31]
“We have a responsibility to create a framework so that this technology...enhances our experience as human beings, not supplant our experience as human beings.”
— Gov. Ron DeSantis [41:19]
“Fraud in elections is less than 2%. The bigger issue is getting people who are registered to regularly show up to vote, not preventing people who shouldn’t be voting from voting.”
— Amisha Cross [46:12]
“It’s not just good enough to talk about affordability without having a plan of action to reduce those prices.”
— Amisha Cross [50:53]
This packed episode covers seismic stories at the intersection of politics, justice, foreign affairs, and technology. The congressional depositions of Hillary and Bill Clinton bring the Epstein scandal back to the forefront, with partisanship and questions of transparency running high. Allegations of withheld DOJ files relating to Trump keep the White House on the defensive. Developments in US–Cuba relations and Iran nuclear diplomacy highlight global instability and the potential for rapid policy shifts. Domestically, a defining fight over the uses and ethics of artificial intelligence pits the Pentagon against innovators, while the higher-stakes backdrop of election security and midterm strategy frames it all. Through interviews, analysis, and rich roundtable debate, Meet the Press NOW delivers a comprehensive, engaging portrait of a nation at a political crossroads.