WavePod Logo

wavePod

← Back to Morning Joe
Podcast cover

D.C. says no to Trump: Residents 'overwhelmingly oppose' police takeover, poll shows

Morning Joe

Published: Thu Aug 21 2025

D.C. says no to Trump: Residents 'overwhelmingly oppose' police takeover, poll shows

Summary


Morning Joe – August 21, 2025

Episode Title: D.C. says no to Trump: Residents 'overwhelmingly oppose' police takeover, poll shows
Hosts: Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski, Willie Geist
Panelists: Jonathan Lemire, Claire McCaskill, David Drucker


Overview

This episode of Morning Joe centers on the political and social fallout from President Trump’s federal intervention in Washington, D.C.'s police department. Using fresh polling data, the hosts and contributors examine the overwhelmingly negative response by D.C. residents to the National Guard deployment and discuss the broader messaging and political consequences for both parties. The conversation also pivots to gerrymandering in Texas, Democratic strategies to counter Republican redistricting, and the evolving face of political parody and social media combat as highlighted by California Governor Gavin Newsom. Lighter moments include spirited banter on baseball, NFL predictions, and the chaos of modern air travel.


Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. D.C. Residents Overwhelmingly Oppose Trump’s Police Takeover

[03:11–12:06]

  • Poll Results: A Washington Post/George Mason University poll shows 79% of D.C. residents oppose Trump's federal takeover of the police department; only 17% support it. 65% believe it will not reduce violent crime.
    • Quote: "D.C. residents overwhelmingly opposed President Trump's federal takeover...and they do not believe his efforts actually will reduce crime in the District." — David Drucker, [03:11]
  • Disconnect Between Policy and Public Sentiment:
    • Residents acknowledge a real crime problem (91% call crime a problem, especially Black residents and women), but this “isn’t the answer.”
    • "You can have a good idea. If you overreach in the application...it does no good." — Jonathan Lemire, [04:36]
  • Political Perceptions: Democrats concerned about appearing soft on crime, but argue federal tactics are wrongheaded and largely for political image-building.
  • Deployment Criticized: National Guard and federal police largely stationed at tourist landmarks (“photo ops”), not high-crime neighborhoods.
    • "They like the images they're creating...That's why they sent out the vice president, the defense secretary, Stephen Miller all out yet defending this." — Joe Scarborough, [07:55]

2. Critique of National Guard Deployment and Crime Reduction Messaging

[05:23–12:06]

  • Arrest Data: Most arrests are for immigration violations (163) or other low-level charges, not homicides (just two).
    • "If the problem is violent crime, why are we taking DEA away...to pick up people on immigration? It makes no sense." — Willie Geist, [06:09]
  • Political Showdown: Moves seen as a partisan show, not genuine partnership for public safety.
    • “This hasn't been a partnership. This has been a show for a lot of people." — Jonathan Lemire, [07:00]
  • Budget Cuts: House Republicans propose cutting a billion dollars from D.C.’s budget while imposing federal control.
    • "A billion dollars. House Republicans. To cut a billion dollars. Money that could have been used for quality of life and law enforcement in better ways than this show of force." — Joe Scarborough, [08:54]
  • Summary: Broad consensus on the show is that while D.C. has a crime issue, flooding tourist zones with troops is overreach, sets bad precedent, and ignores smarter solutions.

3. The Redistricting Arms Race: Texas and California

[12:06–18:39]

  • Texas Moves to Add GOP Seats: Texas passes a new congressional map, possibly giving Republicans 5 more seats; districts intentionally drawn for greater GOP performance.
    • Quote: "The underlying goal of this plan is straightforward: improve Republican political performance...Each of these newly drawn districts now trend Republican." — Jonathan Lemire quoting Texas GOP rep, [12:50]
  • Supreme Court Enabling Gerrymandering: Changes since Shelby County decision allow rapid dismantling of minority districts; both parties now pursue aggressive redrawing.
    • "The legacy of the Roberts court is...the decisions they made in Shelby and other cases...now you can bust up Black districts." — Willie Geist, [14:31]
  • Democrats Respond in Kind: California’s Gov. Newsom launches counter-redistricting; Obama supports this approach despite norm-breaking.
    • "Democrats must respond effectively to Republican gerrymandering efforts, even if it means breaking with norms." — David Drucker, [15:22]
  • Impacts on Democracy: Safe seats fuel extremism, reduce incentive for compromise, and make Congress less responsive to general electorate.
    • "Safe seats in the House create gridlock...it's a disincentive to compromise." — Willie Geist, [17:28]
  • Cycle of Escalation: Discussion acknowledges both sides now feel compelled to “fight fire with fire,” heightening national polarization.

4. Partisan Incentives and Congressional Gridlock

[18:39–24:51]

  • Primary Elections Dominate: Safe seats mean races are won/lost in primaries, not generals, pushing both parties to extremes.
    • "All the action...is in the primaries...It's the primary where they can be ousted." — Claire McCaskill, [19:50]
  • Warning of Backfire: Overly-precise gerrymandering can lead to unexpected competitive districts in wave elections.
    • "They shave it so close that if you have a swing election, this actually backfires and Democrats have a tidal wave election." — Jonathan Lemire, [21:36]
  • Trend Spreading: Other states (Missouri, Indiana) are watching and may replicate the Texas strategy, both parties girding for a long-term arms race.

5. Newsom vs. Trump: Political Parody and the Evolution of Democratic Messaging

[30:01–38:41]

  • Newsom’s Social Media Strategy: The California governor has leaned into parody, using AI images and Trump-like online tactics to mock the former president.
    • "He's been mimicking the President's own style of online posts. Some are rambling diatribes in all caps...Others feature AI images." — David Drucker, [30:01]
  • Democrats Urged to “Have More Fun”: Panel credits Newsom for injecting energy and irreverence, seeing it as a way to both mock Trump and galvanize a restless base.
    • "You're making people laugh…and you're showing you're not afraid to fight. And so many Democrats in the past have been afraid to fight." — Joe Scarborough, [34:39]
  • Risks of Mimicry: Panel notes that authenticity is paramount—parody works for Newsom as long as it’s clear it’s not imitation but mockery.
    • "When voters feel like they're trying to be somebody else...that's when it goes awry. Newsom has been clear he's not trying to be somebody else, that he's making fun of somebody else." — Claire McCaskill, [35:38]
  • Republicans Take the Bait: The hosts note with irony that while Democrats have often fallen for Trump’s “trolls,” the GOP is now doing so in response to Newsom’s mocking posts.
    • "Now you got Gavin doing these things and you have Republicans...That's the troll." — Jonathan Lemire, [37:24]

6. Lighter Segments: Baseball, Football, and Air Travel

[43:02–59:02]

  • Baseball Banter: Friendly trash talk over Yankees vs. Red Sox rivalry; discussion on bullpen woes, trade deadline, and standout players (Chapman, Giolito).
    • "I've fired Aaron Boone five times this year, baby." — Claire McCaskill, [50:31]
    • "Do you even remember the last time the Yankees won a World Series?" — Jonathan Lemire, [51:07]
  • Football Predictions: Early NFL season picks; Chiefs, Eagles, 49ers noted as strong contenders; some grumbling about the era of franchise "dynasties."
  • Frustrations with Air Travel: Widespread delays, staff shortages, and viral airplane incidents; lampooned lawsuits over “windowless window seats.”
    • "You advertise you're getting a window and you pay for a window and you don't get a window—there's a class action." — Willie Geist, [44:27]

7. College Sports and NIL Chaos

[54:00–58:47]

  • Name, Image, Likeness (NIL): Discussion about the destabilizing effect on college football/basketball of new NIL rules and free transfer system.
    • "It's destroyed college football. It's really destroyed March Madness." — Jonathan Lemire, [56:02]
    • "Pitino has said it out loud. They don't recruit high school anymore...they just go to the end of the season: who are the best players on the best teams, and let's go get them." — David Drucker, [57:31]
  • Potential Reforms: Suggestion to pay all Division I athletes the same; lament lack of contracts or stability.

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

  • On D.C. Policing:
    • “If your answer is statistics—nothing to see here—to borrow a term from South Park, then the president may often come up on the better end of this.” — David Drucker, [10:53]
  • Redistricting Arms Race:
    • “Fine, you want to do it? Let’s dance, let’s go. Let’s redraw every single state we can as Democrats.” — Willie Geist, [17:28]
  • Political Parody:
    • "We need to stand up to this authoritarian...This guy is an invasive species...he is unmoored. There are no constraints. So yes, we're going to punch back." — Gavin Newsom (paraphrased), [31:26]
  • On Being Authentic:
    • “The best way to win is to be your authentic self.” — Jonathan Lemire, [33:06]
  • On NIL in College Sports:
    • "You've got to recruit four years in a row. You can't build character. You can't...turn them into great players who can excel in the NFL. That's not happening." — Jonathan Lemire, [57:19]

Timestamps for Key Segments

  • D.C. Resident opposition polling: [03:11–12:06]
  • Arrest stats and policing strategy: [05:23–07:55]
  • Gerrymandering arm’s race (TX and CA): [12:06–18:39]
  • Effects on party primaries and national polarization: [18:39–24:51]
  • Newsom’s parody strategy and 2028 positioning: [30:01–38:41]
  • Baseball/NFL banter: [43:02–53:36]
  • College sports, NIL, and transfer portal discussion: [54:00–58:47]

Overall Tone & Takeaways

  • Morning Joe maintains its signature blend of heated political analysis, insightful commentary, and playful banter. The tone is direct, often irreverent, and occasionally self-deprecating.
  • Central themes include the dangers of political overreach, the self-defeating cycle of partisan escalation (in law enforcement and gerrymandering), and the increasing use of parody or irreverence as a political tool, especially on the Democratic side.
  • The episode ends on more personal and lighter notes, including sports, television criticism, and the “brokenness” of both air travel and college sports.

No transcript available.