Morning Wire Weekend Edition: “A Pollster’s Look at the 2025 Post-Election Map and What Comes Next”
Date: November 15, 2025
Hosts: John Bickley & Georgia Howe
Guest: Brent Buchanan, CEO of Signal Polling
Episode Overview
This episode evaluates the political fallout from the 2025 off-year elections, focusing on the implications for both Republicans and Democrats as they navigate a landscape marked by a record-long government shutdown and shifting voter sentiments. Pollster Brent Buchanan joins to analyze what the results reveal about party strengths, voter behavior—especially among key demographics—and the challenges and opportunities ahead for both major parties.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Reading the 2025 Election Results
(02:24–04:02)
- Democrats’ Success: Buchanan emphasizes that Democratic victories stemmed from high voter energy and anger, particularly directed at Donald Trump and narratives tied to the shutdown.
- “Democrats were energized, Republicans were complacent, and anger remains the most potent driver of turnout. And the anger was definitely on the side of Democrats.” (Buchanan, 02:49)
- Shut Down Narrative: Media framing was heavily against Republicans—even though Buchanan claims Democrats sustained the shutdown—impacting swing voter groups.
- Mainstream Media Impact: 87% of major network coverage allegedly favored Democrats’ narrative, fueling voter anger at Republicans. (04:02)
2. Voter Demographics and Behavior
(04:23–05:40)
- Young Women and Urban, Non-College-Educated Voters: These groups shifted back toward Democrats due to dissatisfaction and perceptions of GOP complacency.
- Turnout Numbers in Virginia: Stark disparities in Democratic vs. Republican base turnout.
- “Abigail Spamberger got 82% of the raw vote that Harris received [in '24], and Winsome Sears…only got 69% of Trump’s 2024 raw vote.” (Buchanan, 05:00)
- Political Malaise: Both parties viewed negatively—voters aren’t embracing Democrats, so much as rejecting Republicans or staying home.
3. Women as Candidates: Trend or Fluke?
(05:40–06:45)
- Roommates Turned Rivals: Notably, Spanberger (VA) and Sherrill (NJ) were congressional roommates, both benefiting from boring, non-radical profiles.
- “The takeaway…for Democrats should be that [they should] elect boring candidates and not radical candidates.” (Buchanan, 06:20)
- “Boring v. Radical” Frame: Performs better electorally than ideological extremes, as seen in NYC’s socialists’ reduced margins.
4. The Youth Opportunity Crisis & Political Volatility
(07:03–08:32)
- “Burn It Down” Mentality: Younger generations don’t see the institutional advantages boomers enjoyed. With the dream of home ownership and stability out of reach, younger voters are increasingly volatile in their allegiances.
- “That dream is completely out of reach for anybody under the age of 40, potentially most people under 50...The bill of goods that they were promised is completely spoiled.” (Buchanan, 07:20)
- Swinging Directions: There’s notable overlap/tension between previous Bernie supporters and Trump voters—willingness to "shake up the system" persists.
5. Distrust in Institutions
(08:32–09:40)
- Multi-Generational Disconnect: Young voters’ experiences differ drastically from older voters’ perceptions, feeding anger and anti-establishment sentiment.
- “The older voters talk about the world as it existed 20, 30 years ago, as if that exists today. And the younger voters look at them like they have three heads.” (Buchanan, 09:20)
6. Implications for the Next Electoral Cycle
(09:53–12:01)
- Demand for Immediate Results: Swing voters will continue to flip if neither party delivers “quick results”—especially on affordability.
- Republican Strategy:
- Focus on delivering affordability (housing, groceries, etc.).
- Tie economic issues to immigration by stressing supply, demand, and cost.
- Notably, the need to keep Trump voters engaged—even if he’s not on the ballot.
- “If not, they're going to be seen as being disloyal to him…these people are going to stay home.” (Buchanan, 14:23)
- Handling Policy Proposals: Republicans must propose responsible, implementable ideas, unlike opposition parties that can promise idealistic policies without having to govern.
7. Emergence of Radical Candidates & Reactions
(11:11–12:01)
- Challenge of Governing: Outsider candidates can campaign on ideas, but executing them—especially expensive, sweeping reforms—is much harder.
- Mamdani’s Mandate: Watch closely whether NYC’s new socialist-leaning mayor implements his platform or moderates in response to bureaucratic realities.
8. Under-the-Radar Trends and Pitfalls for Republicans
(12:52–15:51)
- Immigration-Economics Tie: Policy discussions should link border security to price stabilization for food and housing.
- Embrace, Not Distance, from Trump: Shying away risks demoralizing the base; Democrats will attack any Republican as “Trump 2.0” anyway.
- Voter Anger: GOP needs to inspire anger for turnout—Democrats have it, Republicans currently lack it.
- “Anger is the largest emotion that exists to create turnout. And if we don't find a way to make our folks angry...that's the opportunity.” (Buchanan, 14:52)
- Radical Policy Perceptions: 55% of midterm voters see Mamdani-like socialist policies as making Democrats more radical—a vulnerability for Dems that the GOP can exploit.
9. Role of Culture Wars/Anti-Woke Messaging
(15:51–16:53)
- Multiplicative, Not Primary, Effects: Anti-woke themes can help, but only for candidates who first address voters’ economic pains.
- 2025’s Losing Strategy: Virginia’s GOP’s focus solely on culture war issues, without economic solutions, failed.
- “Those things are helpful to push it over the top, but they can't carry all the weight.” (Buchanan, 16:53)
10. Looking Forward: What Both Parties Must Do
(16:53–17:16)
- Republicans must:
- Deliver material improvements, especially affordability.
- Aggressively link economic issues to immigration.
- Maintain base enthusiasm by tying themselves to Trump’s messaging.
- Capitalize on Democrats’ slide into perceived radicalism.
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- On Media and Narrative:
“87% of the coverage by the big three networks favored Democrats in terms of how they covered the shutdown. Completely dishonest in terms of what was actually happening on the ground there.” (Bickley, 04:02) - On “Boring” Versus “Radical”:
“I think the story is boring versus radical more than it is male versus female.” (Buchanan, 06:43) - On Generational Frustration:
“The world they're experiencing is totally different than the one that boomers and older generations got to benefit from and are still benefiting from.” (Buchanan, 09:24) - On the Need for Action:
“Republicans have got to get on their game about delivering on affordability.” (Buchanan, 09:58) - On Winning Elections:
“Republicans win elections when voters believe that the Democrats are more radical and extreme than the Republicans. And that's the narrative that has to be created.” (Buchanan, 15:44) - On Culture War Issues:
“Those things are helpful to push it over the top, but they can't carry all the weight.” (Buchanan, 16:53)
Important Segment Timestamps
- 2025 Election Analysis: 02:24–04:02
- Demographic Turnout Discussion: 04:23–05:40
- Women on the Ticket Analysis: 05:40–06:45
- Young Voters & Dream of Opportunity: 07:03–08:32
- Institutional Distrust: 08:32–09:40
- Voter Volatility: 09:53–12:01
- Republican Strategic Pitfalls & Opportunities: 12:52–15:51
- Culture War Messaging: 15:51–16:53
Conclusion
This Morning Wire episode provides a sharp, evidence-driven analysis of the electoral wake of 2025, underscoring that both parties remain unpopular and must adapt to a hyper-fluid voter landscape. For Republicans, reigniting anger on kitchen table issues (especially affordability) and not shying away from Trump will be crucial. For Democrats, remaining grounded and avoiding radicalism appears the safer path. Both, however, face a younger, angrier, and more skeptical electorate than ever before.
