
Loading summary
A
This Father's Day. Don't go halfway. Give dad American meat that meets his standards. Give him Good Ranchers. Everything from Good Ranchers is sourced from local farms and ranches, then delivered straight to your door. And for a limited time, when you purchase any Father's Day gift box from Good Ranchers, they'll throw in free Wagyu burgers for dad to enjoy. Just head to goodranchers.com pick out any father's Day gift box and the free Wagyu burgers will automatically be applied at checkout because dad deserves a gift that's a cut above the rest. Goodranchers.com American meat delivered Americans.
B
With the ceasefire back in play between the US And Iran, both sides engage in a narrative battle over the terms of the deal.
C
You know, the regime is saying all these things about getting cash, access to frozen funds, what have you. The Trump administration is denying it.
D
We talked to an expert about what we know and don't know yet about the agreement.
B
I'm Georgia Howe with Daily Wire executive editor John Bickley. It's Tuesday, June 16th, and this is Morning Wire.
D
As the UK Continues to reel from a fresh round of protests, the British prime minister imposes one of the world's most restrictive social media bans.
E
The government will ban access to social media for all children under the age of 16.
B
And the white House has officially kicked off the America250 summer celebrations with the opening night drawing tens of millions of viewers worldwide.
D
Thanks for waking up with MORNING Wires. Stay tuned. We have the news you need to know.
B
Through every trial, wars, divisions and cultural
A
change, men and women of faith in
B
America have turned to God for wisdom and strength. As we look forward to the next
A
250 years, we as a nation must be committed to prayer because living up to these ideals as a country begins on our knees.
B
Commit with us at Alliance Defending Freedom.
A
To pray For America, visit joinadf.com pray250 or text Parade 250 to 83848 to sign up.
D
A narrative war has broken out over the new deal between the US And Iran as the details of the agreement remain murky.
B
Joining us now to discuss is Ben and Ben Talablue, the senior director of the Iran program at the foundation for Defense of Democracies. Benham, thanks for coming on.
C
Great to be with you. Thanks for having me.
B
So according to the President, we do have a peace deal and that's due to be signed this week. First, what do we know about the terms?
C
Well, I think this is the million dollar question because we don't have the full text, allegedly. It'll be shared Friday. I think the earlier the better, particularly because the President can use the text against this narrative war that the Islamic Republic has been running. You know, they're making it look like America submitted that America needed this thing much more than the regime did. I mean, yes, we want the street reform moves to be open, but, you know, the regime was sliding towards failed state status anyway, pre protest, pre war. So we have to take some of this stu into account and take it with more than a grain of salt. And the best way to do so is with transparency, truth, heat, and a little bit of light.
B
Now, how solid is this deal? Obviously, the Iranian regime hasn't been very trustworthy or reliable in the past. So how confident can we be?
C
Well, I think we can be moderately confident that we'll get to this phase one where basically the Iranians back down and the Americans back out as it relates to the Strait of Hormuz. But I don't even think this is properly called a peace deal. This is a memorandum of to extend by another 60 days the state of ceasefire between these two sides. The state of ceasefire, by the way, which, as we saw in the past two, two and a half weeks, was a pretty violent, turbulent state of ceasefire, with the Islamic Republic firing on America's partners on the Arab side of the Persian Gulf and even striking Jordan and Israel in some recent rounds of violence there. So some pretty tense times. I think the US Is going to use this time to try to negotiate a bigger nuclear agreement to try to get out some of that highly enriched uranium, hopefully all of the enriched uranium stockpile. And this is where the regime is going to play to the edge in terms of trying to get as many concessions from Washington upfront. But this is an agreement to enter a much larger, more complex problem.
B
Now, the markets at least seemed pretty relieved by this news. Based on their reaction, they seem to think this is going to be meaningful. What have we seen when it comes to the oil markets?
C
Well, the price of oil continues to fall, but broadly, I would say if we're going to define US political, diplomatic, and even military success against the Islamic Republic in economic terms, we should have looked at what the blockade, which the US had for about a month and a half in force, was able to do to the regime's oil exports. But broadly, you need to have the agreement out there. And once that agreement is out there, then we can begin to judge are markets underreacting or overreacting. But one of the things that have constrained the President throughout the course of the war and even the ceasefire. Was both the media and market reaction, and the President's rhetoric, more so even than US Policy action, has been an attempt to dampen and drive down the hype and the hyperbole in media and markets. So the President is paying very close attention, I should say, to the market and the oil market in particular.
B
Now, there's also been a lot of concern that the US Would end up giving way too many concessions to Iran. I mean, of course, we don't know what they are yet, but is that a serious concern that you have?
C
Yeah, it's always a serious concern with the Islamic Republic, because even though they have a bad hand, they tend to play a bad hand well, but if you keep them there, they can overplay their hand, and that can actually unlock some stronger U.S. policy options against this regime. When you're negotiating with this regime and you want to do a deal, the problem is, if it's not going to be a lopsided deal, the regime is going to push for either cash sanctions, relief, waivers, or access to frozen funds. And the question is, which of these things is the Trump administration willing to give? It's almost certain, because of what the President tweeted on Trude Social, that the one thing the US Is giving is taking away the blockade. And that takes the boot off of this major economic artery that was suffocating the regime, and that was the American ability to try to normalize trade in the Strait of Hormuz while preventing ships from docking in Iran's Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman ports.
B
So some clear signs of progress, but definitely not out of the woods. Benham, thanks for coming on.
C
Always a pleasure. Thank you.
B
It is officially summer here in Nashville, and it's very hot and humid. And when we reach this point of the year, I am constantly reaching for linen everything. And I've been collecting quince linen dresses and shirts for a few years now. And at this point, my collection is very Diane Keaton, very coastal grandmother. And quince is the best because they have so many styles and colorways in classic shapes made of natural fabrics like linen and silk that age well and hold up in the heat and hold up to multiple walks, washes. It genuinely feels very luxurious to have high quality linen items that I can really live my life in and not be overly precious about with stains and snags and that kind of thing. My favorite top was about $36. A dress I reach for all the time was about $54. So very fair prices for very high quality items. So elevate your summer wardrobe. Go to quince.com wire for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E.com for free shipping and 365 day returns. That's quints.com wire
A
what's the one thing spreading almost as fast as AI right now? AI risk. That's something we've been talking about here lately, because every new AI tool a company adopts, every new vendor, every new integration creates another opportunity for something to go wrong. That's part of why companies are paying much closer attention right now to trust, compliance and vendor oversight. And that's where Vanta comes in. Vanta is the number one agentic trust platform used by more than 16,000 companies including RAMP, Cursor and Harvey, to stay audit ready and manage security and compliance more efficiently. But what's especially useful is that Vanta doesn't just help during audits, it helps companies monitor the risks that appear between audits across vendors, AI systems integrations and internal environments. The Vanta agent works in the background like a 24.7grc engineer. It identifies issues, drafts, fixes and can reduce vendor assessment time by up to 50%. And for businesses trying to move quickly while still maintaining trust and security, that kind of visibility matters. Whether you're a fast growing startup or a global enterprise, Vanta is here to help you automate your security and compliance and earn and prove trust. Get started today@vanta.com MorningWire. That's V A N T A.com MorningWire
B
while the UK continues to be rocked by a series of rolling protests over immigration and government mismanagement, the British Prime Minister announced this week he'll be imposing a social media ban for young people that goes, quote, further than any country in the world.
D
Here to discuss all the new restrictions and the ongoing unrest in the UK is Bev Turner, host of GB News Late Show Live. Bev, great to see you again.
F
And you, John.
D
So we've been tracking these protests that have been reignited by the Belfast attack and we do want to touch on that. But first let's talk about this new social media policy. What exactly is Keir Starmer doing here?
F
This is so shocking because we know the authoritarian intent of this government. I've spoken to you before about Belfast, Rio, where the response was actually not to talk about illegal migration and the perpetrator of that act, but to talk about the fact that social media needed to be clamped down on in times of crisis. So what this new policy that the government is proposing is to ban social media for under 16s. So that will mean TikTok, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, all of these, these platforms that children use on their devices will be banned from spring next year for under 16s. Now sound of course like an honorable thing to do. Anyone who's got kids knows that the main thing that we argue about is their screen use, but that's mainly about being addictive. What this will mean, you can't prove a 13 year old is using TikTok unless you're proving that a 30 year old can use TikTok. So it will be facial scanning, it will be having to give up your anonymity online so the government and big tech can always see what you're doing, what you're posting, what you're reading, what you're photographing. It genuinely is the stuff of nightmares. But those of us who've been watching Keir Starmer closely knew that this was always his intention.
D
You touched on it there. But to unpack this further. So the government will enforce this, you're saying, by facial recognition technology, there's no
F
other way to prove your age. This is what's happened in Australia. We are basically copying what they introduced in December of last year. Now, there's no evidence yet that it's had any positive effect on the mental well being of children, which is ostensibly what this is all supposed to be about. But I think that is just dressing up the door to the digital cage as a velvet rope. And frankly, who would argue against keeping children safe? It will be facial recognition. That's the only way that they can verify exactly who you are. And you know what, John, Anyone who knows teenagers will tell you that what the teenager will do is they'll get their phone and they'll go to their mom and they'll say, mom, can I borrow your face for a minute? And then they'll hold up their phone to their mom's face so that they can access social media. So it will have absolutely no effect, I don't believe, on kids being addicted to these algorithms.
D
This is why I never lend my face to my daughters.
F
Never lend your face to your daughters. No, exactly. But they will find a way around it for sure.
D
For sure. And you're. You talked about, we've talked about the sort of broader authoritarian tendencies of Starmer. Can you unpack that more for our audience?
F
I've spoken to you, I think before, about the fact that he's been Putting pressure on Apple and on Google to take away some of this encryption that happens on these platforms so that the government could have access via the back door to see anything that you're doing that. It would be what's called client side technology. It would be on our devices, effectively software updates, which means that so much of our privacy would go. Nobody voted for this. We haven't had a conversation in the UK about whether we are comfortable giving up our anonymity online. We also remember have, I think it's about 30,000 people a year in the UK are arrested for non crime hate incidents, which is a ridiculous way of saying you've said something that somebody else didn't like. So it is this perfect creation. The government can decide whether what you say is right or wrong. They can work with the tech companies to get you taken offline and your privacy is gone forever. It is the digital cage and we are racing towards it. Other European countries are not having these same restrictions placed upon them that we're facing in the UK at the moment. There's a huge backlash. When they tried to introduce digital ID In January of this year, 3 million people in the UK signed a petition to say we don't want to do it. So what they're basically doing is they're going via the back door. Critically, this week is a huge week in British politics. On Thursday we have a by election which may see the succession of a guy called Andy Burnham who's currently London Mayor. If he gets that seat in an area of Greater Manchester, he will challenge the Prime Minister to become the leader of our country in number 10 unelected, but he will challenge him within his own Labour Parliamentary party. We might have a new Prime Minister in a few weeks time and this act with social media will be Keir Starmer's passing shot, doing exactly what his globalist pals want him to do in collaboration. The framework of this was all written up with the WEF and the United nations and the World Health Organization. They've given him his job. It looks like Starmer's going to do it, probably as he gets kicked out the back door.
D
And meanwhile, as we've said, you know, ignoring the anti immigration sentiment, effectively trying to suppress that.
F
Nobody's talking about it, John, nobody's talking about it. That's gone away. We don't discuss illegal migration, irregular migration as we now call it. Of course, the sentiment amongst the people on the streets is still there, but the dissent has been quelled. We've got this massive political event in the UK on Thursday. It's worth watching very closely because whatever happens in the UK, I've always thought you've got to watch here politically in terms of the migration, in terms of the debates, in terms of clamping down on free speech. It could soon be coming to America.
D
Part of the reason we cover the UK So much and love having you on every time. Bev, thanks so much for coming on.
F
My pleasure.
D
D.C. is still abuzz after the epic White House UFC Freedom 250 event that saw President Trump back in his role as entertainer in chief. The fights officially kicked off the America250 celebrations that will be front and center through July.
B
Here with analysis is Daily Wire opinion editor Ben Domenech, host of the Big Ben Show. Ben, thanks for coming on.
E
Of course. Always great to be with you.
B
So we've talked about the spectacle of the big brawl on the White House lawn, but on a broader scale. What are you seeing in terms of the ripple effects from the event?
E
Well, I think that there was a kind of a feeling of unease among a lot of Washington Republicans and people who thought that perhaps this type of event would play as being tone deaf in a time of economic strain, concerns about the international scene and the like. Instead, I think the feeling today in Washington is that this came off like an epic event, something that was impressive, that was, you know, obviously a visual spectacle and something that frankly, made a lot of people very proud to just sort of see something like this that could happen in this era. Look, you know, we're Talking about the 250th anniversary in a moment in which we have a president who kind of leans into every aspect of America, American culture. If you could turn Donald Trump into gift form, he might be that guy shirtless, waving the American flag in the midst of a hurricane. And so I think that this is the type of thing that actually plays to his strengths. And certainly they pull it off. And Dana White and the UFC folks, the TKO company, and everybody who participated in making this event possible, they feel very confident in how this came off.
B
Now, you mentioned some of the hand wringing among some Republican elites, but what do we know about the response from the American people?
E
I mean, I think the American people were very interested in this. It's certainly something that has compelling storylines, had incredible bouts. And also, I think, look, this speaks to the president's power as a cultural figure. It's one of these things that he can do that other politicians just can't. We haven't seen something like this before. And while Teddy Roosevelt could weigh in know, things that, that could play into the American psyche, like American football. While we've seen presidents in the past who have, you know, weighed into their own sports fandom, the president simply seems to be somebody who wants to make sure that the American people understand he puts these things at the center of their lives. And when it comes to the kind of cultural, you know, symbols and everything else that was coming out around this, some of the videos that came out of this were incredible. And the stories that these people told fighters and others about their lives, I think they really allowed the president to sort of send a signal to a lot of the people who are in his fan base, naturally, but independent voters as well, that this is an administration that wants to be proud of everything that we've achieved after 250 years, not one that was going to sort of shirk any kind of historical burden and say that basically America was a nation that needed to apologize for the things that we've done in the past, or something along those lines, which I think we probably would have seen had Joe Biden been president during this tenure.
B
Well, definitely a shot in the arm for patriotic Americans everywhere. Ben, thanks so much for coming on.
E
Great to be with you.
D
Thanks for waking up with us. The reporting that fuels this show is only possible because you tune in every day and because of all of our Daily Wire subscribers.
B
To enjoy the show ad free and to join our mission, become a member@dailywire.com we'll be back later this evening with more news. You need to know.
C
Who helps America go farther, fly higher, dream even bigger? People do. Since 1879, our people have been more than a source of energy. They've been a source of progress. Today, that same progress is helping deliver record US Energy production, fueling the workers, the makers, the boundary pushers and risk takers who spark the breakthroughs that move America forward. Learn more about what our people do@chevron.com USA250.
This episode of Morning Wire covers two significant headlines: the official kickoff of America’s 250th anniversary “America250” celebrations, including a visually dramatic White House UFC event, and the United Kingdom’s controversial move to enforce an under-16 social media ban via facial recognition technology amid ongoing social unrest. The episode features insight from security, political, and media experts.
Guest: Benham Ben Talablue, Foundation for Defense of Democracies
Guest: Bev Turner, GB News (08:48)
Guest: Ben Domenech, Daily Wire (15:11)
The episode’s tone is cautionary and patriotic. The hosts and guests stress wariness regarding globalist trends and privacy infringements (UK segment), while celebrating American resilience and cultural showmanship during the 250th anniversary launch. The commentary is skeptical toward government overreach, proud of American traditions, and urges transparency and vigilance on international deals.
This episode is especially relevant for listeners interested in the intersection of technology, policy, civil liberties, and the evolving nature of patriotism.