Morning Wire Podcast Summary
Episode: “Bigger Scandal Than Watergate:” Inside the Senate's Biden Investigation
Release Date: June 21, 2025
Host: John Bickley
Co-Host: Georgia Howe
Presented by: The Daily Wire
Introduction
In the June 21, 2025 episode of Morning Wire, hosted by John Bickley and co-hosted by Georgia Howe, the focus centers on a high-stakes investigation led by the Senate Judiciary Committee into President Joe Biden's administration. Titled “Bigger Scandal Than Watergate: Inside the Senate's Biden Investigation,” the episode delves deep into allegations concerning Biden's cognitive abilities during his presidency and claims of media complicity in obscuring the truth.
Context of the Investigation
The episode kicks off with John Bickley setting the stage for a significant Senate Judiciary Committee hearing targeting the Biden administration's inner workings. The primary questions revolve around whether President Biden's cognitive decline impaired his ability to govern and if legacy media outlets were involved in a cover-up.
John Bickley [00:01]:
“...ensuring more transparency in the future. I'm Daily Wire Executive editor John Bickley with Georgia Howe.”
Senator Eric Schmidt's Insights
Senator Eric Schmidt from Missouri, a leading figure in the inquiry alongside Senator Cornyn, provides a comprehensive preview of the impending Senate hearings. He articulates the gravity of the situation by comparing the current scandal to Watergate, emphasizing its potential magnitude.
Eric Schmidt [01:58]:
“...this scandal's bigger than Watergate, but everybody's very eager to sweep it under the rug. And I just don't think the American people should accept that.”
Schmidt underscores the urgency of addressing what he perceives as President Biden’s mental incapacitation and the ensuing questions about who truly held the reins of power during his tenure.
Media's Role and Credibility
A significant portion of Schmidt's discourse targets the media's role in masking Biden's alleged decline. He criticizes both traditional and left-wing media for propagating narratives that undermined observable signs of Biden's incompetence.
Eric Schmidt [03:24]:
“...there's special prosecutor Robert Herc specifically did not bring charges on the documents case because he didn't think Biden could stand trial. He wasn't competent to stand trial.”
Schmidt accuses the media of collusion, suggesting that their allegiance to maintaining President Trump’s political viability overshadowed objective reporting. He references the behavior of media personalities like Mrs. Jean Pierre, who he claims actively worked to discredit dissenting voices.
Eric Schmidt [06:38]:
“...nobody was willing to do it because so many of them suffer from Trump derangement syndrome, and they were willing to continue, not just ignore it, but pedal these lies.”
Future Steps and Transparency Measures
Looking ahead, Schmidt outlines the committee's dual approach to rectifying the current crisis and preventing future occurrences. The first step involves a thorough examination of past events to understand the depth and breadth of Biden's administration's issues.
Eric Schmidt [08:06]:
“...we have to make sure that there's a full sort of expose of what went down. Right. And why and who and when and what should have happened differently.”
Simultaneously, Schmidt advocates for increased transparency in governance. He envisions a future where presidential actions are more open and accessible to the public, citing President Trump's approach as a model.
Eric Schmidt [08:06]:
“...the transparency, the ability or the willingness to have the press just come into the Oval Office as he's signing executive orders, asking questions, answering questions about any topic... that's what's going to matter.”
Furthermore, Schmidt hints at potential legislative reforms, including reassessing the 25th Amendment and introducing mandatory cognitive assessments for sitting presidents to safeguard the nation's constitutional integrity.
Conclusion
The episode concludes with John Bickley highlighting the Daily Wire's role in fostering transparency and encouraging robust journalistic practices. Senator Schmidt reiterates his commitment to unveiling the truth and restoring public trust through the Senate's diligent investigation.
John Bickley [09:23]:
“...encourages transparency. Senator Schmidt, thank you so much for taking the time to talk with us.”
Eric Schmidt [09:44]:
“Anytime. Take care.”
Key Takeaways
-
Magnitude of the Scandal: Senator Schmidt positions the current investigation as potentially more significant than the Watergate scandal, emphasizing its implications for constitutional governance.
-
Allegations of Cognitive Decline: Central to the investigation is the claim that President Biden's mental capabilities were compromised, raising questions about his decision-making and leadership.
-
Media Complicity: The episode presents a critical view of legacy and left-wing media outlets, accusing them of suppressing the truth to protect political interests.
-
Future Transparency: Schmidt advocates for legislative measures to ensure greater transparency and accountability in the executive branch, including revisiting the 25th Amendment and instituting regular cognitive evaluations for the president.
-
Public Trust: The overarching theme is restoring and enhancing trust in governmental institutions through openness, accountability, and informed oversight.
Notable Quotes
-
Eric Schmidt [01:58]:
“…this scandal's bigger than Watergate, but everybody's very eager to sweep it under the rug.”
-
Eric Schmidt [03:24]:
“...special prosecutor Robert Herc specifically did not bring charges on the documents case because he didn't think Biden could stand trial.”
-
Eric Schmidt [06:38]:
“...many of them suffer from Trump derangement syndrome, and they were willing to continue, not just ignore it, but pedal these lies.”
-
Eric Schmidt [08:06]:
“…transparency, the ability or the willingness to have the press just come into the Oval Office as he's signing executive orders... that's what's going to matter.”
Morning Wire delivers a compelling and contentious examination of the ongoing Senate investigation into President Biden, framed as a pivotal moment for American democracy. Through incisive interviews and pointed critiques, the episode calls for a re-evaluation of media practices and governmental transparency to safeguard the nation's constitutional framework.