Laken Riley Murder Verdict & Federal Bathroom Battles | 11.21.24

Summary

Morning Wire: Episode Summary – "Laken Riley Murder Verdict & Federal Bathroom Battles | 11.21.24"

Release Date: November 21, 2024

---

1. Laken Riley Murder Verdict

Overview: The episode opens with the significant courtroom development in the tragic murder case of Georgia nursing student, Laken Riley. The defendant, Jose Ibarra, an illegal immigrant from Venezuela, was found guilty on all counts, including malice murder, felony murder, kidnapping, and aggravated assault with intent to rape.

Key Details:

• Verdict Announcement:

  • [00:03] Judge Patrick Haggard: "Count one, malice murder, I find the defendant guilty."
  • [00:08] Prosecutor Sheila Ross: "Count two, felony murder, I find the defendant guilty."
  • [00:12] Judge Patrick Haggard: "Count three, felony murder, I find the defendant guilty."

• Evidence Presented:

  • Ash Short, Daily Wire Senior Editor, elaborated on the swift verdict: "Judge Patrick Haggard delivered his verdict just 19 minutes after the prosecution and defense presented their closing arguments... It was likely the DNA evidence that sealed his fate."
  • DNA found under Riley's fingernail indicated she fought her attacker, corroborated by images of Ibarra with scratches on his arms and hands ([02:17]).

• Prosecutor's Argument:

  • [03:08] Megan Basham: “She scratched him. How do you get scratches on the back of your neck?... She marked him. She marked him for everyone to see.”

• Defense Strategy:

  • The defense attempted to shift blame to Ibarra's brother, Diego, citing surveillance footage and DNA contamination ([03:58]).

• Sentence Imposed:

  • Ibarra received a life sentence without the possibility of parole ([04:43]). District Attorney Deborah Gonzalez emphasized prioritizing judicial integrity over political considerations.

Implications: This verdict underscores ongoing concerns regarding illegal immigration policies. With President Donald Trump poised to implement stricter border security measures, the case exemplifies the potential impact of revamped immigration strategies.

---

2. Battle Over Single-Sex Bathrooms

Overview: A heated debate resurfaces on Capitol Hill as South Carolina Congresswoman Nancy Mace spearheads legislation to protect single-sex bathrooms on federal properties. This move reignites the longstanding cultural debate over transgender rights and privacy in public spaces.

Key Highlights:

• Congresswoman Nancy Mace's Stance:

  • [00:46] Georgia Howe: Introduces the topic.
  • [06:32] Nancy Mace: “Forcing women to share private spaces with men is not dignity and not respect... If you agree with that, you're crazy because that's not okay."

• Legislative Push:

  • Mace is expanding her bill to cover all federal properties, following initial measures protecting facilities on Capitol Hill ([06:50]).

• Cultural and Political Context:

  • Prosecutor Sheila Ross provides analysis: “The election of a Delaware transgender activist, Sarah McBride, to Congress... has intensified the debate.”
  • Public opinion has shifted significantly since the 2016 North Carolina bathroom bill, with recent polls indicating only 31% support for allowing men into women's facilities ([07:19]).

• Republican Advantage:

  • With President Trump's anticipated re-election, the Republican Party gains momentum on this issue. [07:47] Nancy Mace shares her personal motivations, referencing her experiences as a survivor of rape and abuse.

• Corporate and Democratic Response:

  • Corporate backlash against transgender advocacy has intensified, leading companies like Bud Light and Target to distance themselves from the movement.
  • Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, have condemned Mace's proposal as "mean and cruel," likening it to sex discrimination ([09:54]).

Notable Quotes:

• [07:47] Nancy Mace: “I was raped at the age of 16... I am absolutely triggered by the idea of a man's genitalia being in my bathroom.”
• [09:54] Prosecutor Sheila Ross: "President Trump is for you."

Implications: The push for single-sex bathrooms reflects broader national tensions surrounding transgender rights and privacy. As legislation progresses, it is poised to significantly impact federal property policies and societal norms.

---

3. Trump's Strategy on Recess Appointments for Cabinet Picks

Overview: The episode delves into President Donald Trump's consideration of using recess appointments to expedite his cabinet selections. This strategy aims to circumvent potential legislative delays and secure key positions swiftly.

Key Insights:

• Understanding Recess Appointments:

  • [11:24] Tim Rice, Deputy Managing Editor, explains: “Recess appointments are presidential appointments made while Congress is out of session... The Constitution gives the Senate power to advise and consent on all presidential appointments.”

• Legal and Procedural Hurdles:

  • Historically, recess appointments for high-level positions like Cabinet secretaries are rare ([12:37]).
  • The 2014 Supreme Court ruling during Obama’s administration set a precedent requiring a 10-day adjournment for such appointments ([12:31]).

• Trump's Motivation and Challenges:

  • [13:24] Judge Patrick Haggard: Trump aims to "fill his Cabinet quickly and avoid delays" experienced in his first term.
  • Potential obstacles include Senate Majority Leader John Thune’s commitment to maintaining Senate norms and possible resistance from fellow Republicans over controversial nominees.

• Potential Constitutional Conflicts:

  • Trump has hinted at using presidential power to adjourn Congress if necessary, a move likely to face legal challenges ([14:07]).

• Temporary Nature of Recess Appointees:

  • Recess appointees serve only two years and cannot receive salaries, presenting additional complications for the administration ([14:36]).

Notable Quotes:

• [12:31] Judge Patrick Haggard: “Before the 2014 court ruling, recess appointments were a lot more common... But Trump's plan to get most or all of his cabinet installed through recess appointments would really be unprecedented.”
• [13:58] Judge Patrick Haggard: “There's a chance that includes Thune, an institutionalist with a history of jealously guarding Senate norms and traditions.”

Implications: Trump's consideration of recess appointments marks a potential shift in presidential appointment strategies, challenging established legislative processes and Senate authority. Should the administration proceed, it may trigger significant political and legal battles.

---

Conclusion

In this episode of Morning Wire, hosts Georgia Howe and John Bickley navigate through pivotal issues shaping the national discourse:

1. Criminal Justice and Immigration: The conviction of Jose Ibarra highlights the intersection of immigration policies and public safety, setting the stage for forthcoming administrative actions under President Trump’s anticipated tenure.

2. Cultural Debates on Gender and Privacy: The ongoing battle over single-sex bathrooms reflects deep-seated societal divisions, with legislative efforts poised to redefine privacy and rights on federal properties.

3. Presidential Authority and Legislative Norms: Trump's potential use of recess appointments underscores a critical examination of executive power and its implications for checks and balances within the U.S. political system.

Throughout the discussion, notable expert analyses and firsthand quotes provide listeners with a comprehensive understanding of these complex issues, ensuring they are well-informed on the latest developments impacting politics, culture, and governance.

---

This summary encapsulates the essential discussions and insights from the "Morning Wire" episode released on November 21, 2024. For a more in-depth exploration, tuning into the full episode is recommended.

Transcript

[Judge Patrick Haggard]

Count one, malice murder, I find the defendant guilty.

[Prosecutor Sheila Ross]

Count two, felony murder, I find the defendant guilty.

[Judge Patrick Haggard]

Count three, felony murder, I find the defendant guilty.

[Georgia Howe]

The illegal immigrant charged with murdering Laken Riley has been found guilty on all counts.

[John Bickley]

What evidence sealed his fate? And what sentence did the judge impose?

[Georgia Howe]

I'm Georgia Howe with Daily Wire editor in chief John Bickley. It's Thursday, November 21st, and this is MORNING Wire. The battle over single sex bathrooms is being fought on Capitol Hill, and South Carolina Congresswoman Nancy Mace is leading the charge.

[Nancy Mace]

I'm going to do everything I can to protect women and girls here on the Hill, but also all across the nation.

[John Bickley]

And Trump considers using recess appointments to fast track his cabinet picks. We discuss the precedent and potential roadblocks for the strategy.

[Georgia Howe]

Thanks for waking up with Morning wire. Stay tuned. We have the news you need to know.

[Producer Regan]

Hey guys, Producer Regan here. With Trump in, we can finally exhale. But the fact of the matter is our nation is broke and that debt is a house of cards that can't quickly be dismantled. The strategy remains the same. Diversify your savings with Birch Gold. They'll help you convert an IRA or 401k into an IRA in physical gold. Now through Black Friday, get a free 1 oz Silver Eagle for every $5,000 purchased. Text Wire to 989898 to get free comprehensive info kit on gold investing. Trust Birchgold as I do to protect your savings and secure your financial future. Again, text wire to 989-898.

[Georgia Howe]

Today.

[John Bickley]

The illegal immigrant accused of killing Georgia nursing student Lakin Riley has been found guilty on all charges.

[Georgia Howe]

Jose Ibarra, who is in the country illegally from Venezuela, was found guilty on 10 counts, including murder, kidnapping and aggravated assault with the intent to rape. Riley was found dead after she went jogging at the University of Georgia in Athens. Here to discuss the verdict is Daily Wire senior editor Ash Short. So, Ash, tell us about what went down in the courtroom today.

[Ash Short]

Well, there were a lot of emotions as Judge Patrick Haggard delivered his verdict. You'll remember that Ibarra waived his right to a jury trial and opted to have the judge make a determination of his guilt instead. And it should be noted that Haggard delivered that verdict just 19 minutes after the prosecution and defense presented their closing arguments. He also came out and said he was immediately ready to do the sentencing.

[Georgia Howe]

So what evidence made it go so fast?

[Ash Short]

It was likely the DNA. Ibarra's DNA was found under Riley's fingernail, something that would have only occurred if she fought her attacker. And on Monday, the prosecution showed Pictures of Ibarra with scratches on his arms and hands. Riley fought for her life for an estimated 18 minutes, the prosecution said during the trial. And the scratches proved that. Here's what prosecutor Sheila Ross said about the scratches during her closing arguments.

[Megan Basham]

Quite frankly, she got him. She scratched him. How do you get scratches on the back of your neck? How do you get scratches on your back? Lakin left those scratches. And the physical evidence says that she left those scratches because that is why his DNA is underneath her right fingernails. She marked him. She marked him for everyone to see.

[Ash Short]

And Ibarra's own roommates testified that he was guilty. Then there was the fact that Ibarra was seen on surveillance footage disposing of a bloody jacket. So it was pretty indisputable.

[Megan Basham]

He knew her DNA or her blood would be on that, and he got rid of it. That is what we call consciousness of guilt in our business. He threw away those items because he knew he had killed her, and he threw them away because he didn't want anyone to find him.

[Georgia Howe]

So what did the defense say in their closing arguments?

[Ash Short]

Their whole defense was trying to pawn off the crime on Ibarra's brother Diego, who's also an illegal immigrant and a member of the violent Venezuelan gang Trende Aragua. Their basis for that was the suspect being seen in surveillance footage wearing a hat. A hat that turned out to have Diego's DNA on it. The strategy there is to create doubt. And if there is enough doubt, then Jose Ibarra could walk.

[Prosecutor Sheila Ross]

It's more than possible that one brother's DNA would get on another brother's clothes. In fact, that's probable. And who would have had the most cross contamination? Diego and Jose. Because they shared a bed and they shared clothes.

[Ash Short]

But all the other DNA evidence, the fingernail scrapings, the bloody jacket, all pointed to Jose, not Diego.

[Georgia Howe]

Now, what's his sentence?

[Ash Short]

Life in prison without the possibility of parole. Georgia has the death penalty, but District Attorney Deborah Gonzalez said she instead sought life in prison, saying that, quote, the integrity of our judicial process and the pursuit of justice must always transcend political considerations.

[Georgia Howe]

According to rdw, at least the family got some closure. Now, Ash, this case highlighted a lot of the problems with illegal immigration. And now that Donald Trump has won the election, what does that situation look like going forward?

[Ash Short]

Well, many believe Riley would still be alive today if not for President Biden's open borders policy. Ibarra had been arrested previously and was known to be in the country illegally. But things do look like they're changing. On Wednesday, Texas Land Commissioner Don Buckingham said the state would give incoming President Trump a Fort 1400 acre ranch to use as a deportation hub, which should help remove some of the criminal element that has infiltrated the US in recent years. And as Morning Wire has reported, Trump will install Tom Homan to lead border security. And he has recently warned Democrat mayors against harboring illegal immigrants in sanctuary cities.

[Georgia Howe]

Well, definitely something we'll keep an eye on. Ash, thanks for reporting.

[Ash Short]

You're welcome.

[Prosecutor Sheila Ross]

What's the secret sauce behind wildly successful businesses? It's not great products or brilliant market marketing.

[Producer Regan]

It's the unsung hero, the business behind the business.

[Prosecutor Sheila Ross]

For millions of entrepreneurs, that hero is Shopify. Shopify boasts the number one checkout on the planet. With shop pay, they boost conversions up to 50%. That means more sales and fewer abandoned carts. Get a $1 per month trial period at shopify.com morningwire that's shopify.com morningwire.

[Nancy Mace]

Forcing women to share private spaces with men is not dignity and not respect. I'm absolutely going to stand in the way of anyone who thinks it's okay for a man to be in our locker room, in our changing rooms, in our dressing rooms and women's bathrooms. And in fact, if you agree with that, you're crazy because that's not okay. It's not okay.

[John Bickley]

That was South Carolina Congresswoman Nancy Mace on the steps of the Capitol Tuesday answering questions about her new bill that will prevent men from using women's bathrooms on all federal property. This expands a similar measure Mace introduced Monday that protects women's facilities on Capitol Hill.

[Georgia Howe]

Here with more on the battle over bathrooms is Daily Wire culture reporter Megan Basham. So, Megan, obviously this has been a cultural debate for some time now, almost 10 years. What brought this issue to the forefront this week?

[Prosecutor Sheila Ross]

Well, I think it's a couple of things. So foremost is the election of a Delaware transgender activist, Sarah McBride, to Congress. So McBride, who was born male, has made it clear that he expects to have access to the women's facilities. Well, when Mace announced in an exclusive interview with the Daily Wires Mike Michael Knowles, that she's also introducing a bill to cover all federal property. Now, she explained why she's not okay with that expectation.

[Nancy Mace]

There are literally members of Congress today that are saying I'm a bigot and that I'm a bully because I'm defending my right to privacy. Now, a lot of people may not know I'm a survivor of rape. I was raped at the age of 16. I'm also a survivor of domestic abuse and sexual abuse and so I am absolutely triggered by the idea of a man's genitalia being in my bathroom.

[Prosecutor Sheila Ross]

And then the other part of this is that opposing the normalization of transgender ideology has really become a winning issue for Republicans. When the subject first came to national prominence back in 2016 with that North Carolina bathroom bill, it really seemed then like the public wasn't sure what to think about it. If you go back to that time, polling show that voter opinion was pretty much split 50, 50 on whether men should be allowed into women's dressing rooms, bathrooms, things like that. It was really corporate pressure from big companies like Nike and PayPal boycotting North Carolina that ultimately caused the GOP to back off. But since that time, public opinion has shifted pretty starkly. The most recent poll from YouGov finds that now only 31% of Americans support allowing men to use women's facilities. And in that time, we've seen 13 states, including really large states like Texas and Florida, pass bills to protect women's private spaces, and even more states have bills pending.

[Georgia Howe]

Well, still, it takes a lot of gumption to bring a bill like this to the floor. Does Mace have the votes for this to pass?

[Prosecutor Sheila Ross]

You know, I think that she does. That would be my guess. For one thing, with his overwhelming win, this is Donald Trump's party now, and the Trump campaign has had a lot of success with this issue. He not only made it a regular talking point on the campaign trail, he had an incredibly effective battleground ad that framed Harris and the Democrats as being the extremists.

[John Bickley]

Surgery for prisoners.

[Judge Patrick Haggard]

For prisoners.

[Prosecutor Sheila Ross]

Every transgender inmate in the prison system would have access. It's hard to believe, but it's true.

[Judge Patrick Haggard]

Kamala's for they them.

[Prosecutor Sheila Ross]

President Trump is for you.

[John Bickley]

I'm Donald J. Trump, and I approve this message.

[Prosecutor Sheila Ross]

And when asked about this bill, House Majority Leader Mike Johnson came out with a strong statement in support of Mace, saying that while everyone should be treated with dignity, women deserve women's only spaces. And Johnson also added that every House member's office has a private bathroom and that unisex restrooms are available throughout the capital. And then on top of that, we have also seen that corporate America really no longer has the stomach for this fight. Companies like Bud Light, Target, Others have pulled back from aligning themselves with the transgender movement after quite a bit of public backlash.

[Georgia Howe]

Now, what about the Democrats? I imagine this is striking a nerve.

[Prosecutor Sheila Ross]

Well, as you'd expect, they're. They're voicing some pretty strong opposition. McBride sent the Daily Wire a statement saying that Mesa's bill is a blatant attempt from far right wing extremists to distract from the fact that they have no real solutions to what Americans are facing. So that was a quote there. And on Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called Mace's proposal mean and cruel, while other Democrats in the House are liken it to sex discrimination.

[Georgia Howe]

Well, no doubt it is awkward that it was sparked by an individual colleague, but voters do want their representatives to be firm on this. Megan, thanks for reporting.

[Prosecutor Sheila Ross]

Anytime.

[Georgia Howe]

Donald Trump has called for the Senate to confirm his Cabinet secretaries through recess appointments. But what would that look like?

[John Bickley]

Here with a look at how recess appointments work as Daily Wire deputy Managing editor Tim Rice. Hey, Tim. So we're hearing a lot of talk about these recess appointments. But first, what are they exactly?

[Judge Patrick Haggard]

Well, at a very basic level, they're exactly what they sound like. Presidential appointments made while Congress is out of session. But like so much of what goes on in Washington, it's actually a lot more complicated than that. For one, the Constitution gives the Senate power to advise and consent on all presidential appointments. That's one of their big jobs, and they like doing it. The Senate typically has one member gavel in a pro forma session in times like this, precisely to prevent the president from making recess appointments. Second, Trump would need both the House and Senate to vote to adjourn before he could do it. And while Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson have both said they're open to the idea, it's still a pretty big ask. Which brings us to the third hurdle. In 2014, the Supreme Court blocked Barack Obama's recess appointments. When it did, it ruled Congress needed to adjourn for a minimum 10 days for a president to make an appointment without the Senate. That set the bar pretty high, which is one reason Obama was the last president to attempt this kind of thing.

[John Bickley]

So these appointments are uncommon, but they're still some precedent for what Trump wants to do, correct?

[Judge Patrick Haggard]

Yes and no. Before the 2014 court ruling, recess appointments were a lot more common. Bill Clinton made 139 and George W. Bush made 171. But those didn't really include Cabinet secretaries. That's a lot less common. Since 1900, only three cabinet secretaries have been recess appointed. It hasn't happened since 1996, when Bill Clinton named Mickey Cantor Secretary of Commerce. And even that was a special circumstance. The Senate had already confirmed Cantor as U.S. trade representative, and Clinton only appointed him to the new role after the sitting Commerce secretary, Ronald Brown, died in a plane crash. So Trump's plan to get most or all of his cabinet installed through recess appointments would really be unprecedented.

[John Bickley]

It certainly sounds like a heavy lift, which raises the question, why exactly is Trump pushing to do this?

[Judge Patrick Haggard]

Well, to hear him tell it, recess appointments will let him fill his Cabinet quickly and avoid the delays that plagued him during his first term. Of course, this time around, Republicans hold the Senate majority, so Trump shouldn't have an issue getting his nominees pushed through. But he's picked some candidates like Matt Gaetz and Dr. Oz, who have even drawn some opposition from Republicans. So Trump may be hoping that recess appointments will let him override any and all Senate objections, which, getting back to the whole advise and consent thing, could rub some senators the wrong way. There's a chance that includes Thune, an institutionalist with a history of jealously guarding Senate norms and traditions.

[John Bickley]

All right, so let's say Thune or Johnson or whoever finds a way to keep Congress in session. Does Trump have any moves left? In that case?

[Judge Patrick Haggard]

Just one, but it's a doozy. The Constitution gives the president power to adjourn both houses of Congress if they can't agree on the time to do it themselves. Trump actually floated to the idea of doing this at the end of his first term, but noted at the time that this would probably land him in court. It's safe to say things aren't likely to get that far, but if they do, expect a lot of pushback. And one other potential downside, we should note. Recess appointees can only serve for two years, and they're legally not allowed to get paid. So even if Trump manages to get his recess appointees installed, it will hardly be smooth sailing from there.

[John Bickley]

Just one of the many ways his administration is going to keep us all on our toes. Tim, thanks for reporting.

[Judge Patrick Haggard]

Thanks for having me.

[Georgia Howe]

Thanks for waking up with us. We'll be back later this afternoon with more news. You need to know.