
Peter Schweizer breaks down President Biden’s unprecedented pardons for his family, the corruption allegations, and what’s next for congressional investigations. Get the facts first on Morning Wire.
Loading summary
Joe Biden
In the final minutes of his presidency, Joe Biden shocked the political world by issuing preemptive pardons for several of his own family members. The move has sparked renewed calls for investigations into Biden family corruption.
John Bickley
In this episode, we sit down with best selling author Peter Schweitzer to discuss the unprecedented Biden family pardons and Republicans plans to follow the money. I'm Daily Wire editor in chief John Bickley with Georgia Howe. It's Sunday, January 26th, and this is a weekend edition of Morning Wire.
Georgia Howe
This episode is brought to you by Good Ranchers tired of mystery meat at the grocery store? Make new meat your New year's resolution@good ranchers.com subscribe now using Code Wire to get $25 off free express shipping and your choice of add ons for an entire year. Good Ranchers American Meat delivered.
John Bickley
Joining us now is Peter Schweitzer, bestselling author and president of the Government Accountability Institute. Peter, always great to talk to you. Thanks for coming on.
Peter Schweitzer
Of course. Happy to be with you.
John Bickley
Look, we witnessed something this week that Joe Biden repeatedly told the American people he would never do. He preemptively pardoned members of his own family, five of them. This comes after he did something else he swore he wouldn't do, pardon his own son, Hunter. So first we hear the term unprecedented thrown around a lot, especially this last year. Is this indeed unprecedented?
Peter Schweitzer
Yeah. There's no example in American history of a family member of a sitting president being pardoned, no less. Five members of the family, or six if you include Hunter. Also, these sort of preemptive pardons are really unprecedented as well, and those will probably be tested in court.
John Bickley
Yeah, I'd assume so. Now, we've covered the Hunter pardon at length here. In fact, we had you on to talk about it at one point. We now have five more members of the Biden family. And again, like you said, these are preemptive pardons. So different in kind. First, who exactly did he grant this blanket immunity to?
Peter Schweitzer
These are essentially his siblings and their spouses and his son and his daughter. And what's significant is all six of these people are individuals that are connected to LLCs, these limited liability companies that the family had multiple listings of. And these are entities that all received money from these foreign entities. It's also important to point out, John, that each one of these pardons, whether it's Hunter or the other five family members, the pardon specifically mentions any crimes that occurred beginning after January 1st of 2014. That's significant because all of the foreign deals those involving China, China, Ukraine and Russia all started happening in early 2014. So they clearly seem to be dated and designed to cover the transfers of those foreign funds.
John Bickley
Yeah, pretty revealing. Had these particular members had their names come up in investigations or claims by members of Congress?
Peter Schweitzer
Yes, in fact they had. James Comer mentioned all of them. I think Comer actually has a new book out which is quite good by the way, where he mentions all of them. And I think there is a connection there. I think the fact that these are in the sights of Congressional investigators is probably one of the things that prompted Joe Biden to issue this action. Let's also keep in mind that this also in a way provides some protection of Joe Biden as well. Because if you do believe this was an influence peddling scheme, Joe Biden was certainly involved. And by pardoning his spouses and his children, it provides a guardrail of protection for him as well. So this is self serving, not just something beneficial to his family.
John Bickley
Now you've been documenting for years the allegations of Biden family corruption. What is some of the more compelling evidence against them?
Peter Schweitzer
Well, I think the most compelling evidence is that they have collected tens of millions of dollars, some $31 million from these foreign entities and there's no evidence of them giving anything legitimate in return. So in the case of China, for example, we know that they got $5 million from a Chinese businessman named Mr. Zhao. There's no evidence that anything was given to him in return. Business nature and people generally don't pass around $5 million without expecting something in return. So that has always been the mystery. And the fact that the Bidens have a denied that there was any money transference and of course there was and then they denied that Joe Biden was aware of this or involved. We now know that he met with several of these people, makes it very clear that they were trying to cover something up. What Joe Biden did specifically in return for those funds, we don't know. But that's why I think we need to have continued congratulation investigation. It's not about looking in the past and trying to punish a political opponent. It's about trying to unpack exactly what was done for this money so we can deter it from happening in the future with other political figures.
John Bickley
Right now you bring up investigations. First of all, are Biden's family members now truly immune from all charges that have any connection to this? And then can Congress still investigate them? Does this block actual thorough investigations?
Peter Schweitzer
Yeah, no, those are great questions. Well, it's going to be challenged in court, a lot of people question whether you can grant pardon for a crime that may or may not have been committed, that you haven't been charged for, that has never been done before. And there's a lot of legal scholars that say this just simply is too broad because you could essentially, under this construct, you know, provide blanket immunity for a murder that was not discovered until later on. And that seems overly broad as far as congressional investigations are concerned. Absolutely. They can continue to investigate. Jim Comer, I talked to him a couple of days ago, and he told me that he has advised the incoming Attorney General, Pam Bondi, that he believes that the Department of Justice needs to investigate this. You can ask people questions. You can do a criminal investigation, even if you're not targeting the specific family member. And I think Congress needs to investigate it because, again, it's not just about what the Bidens did. One of the true things about Washington, D.C. is if people figure out a way in power to make money for their family and they're not going to be caught and they're not going to be held liable, it will be imitated. So this notion of getting foreign entities to enrich your family when you're in a decision maker, in a position to help or hurt them could become widespread, and I don't think anybody wants that.
John Bickley
Yeah, there's been a lot made of Trump coming in supposedly with retribution on his mind. But this argument that we're maybe exposed to national security risks from foreign entities that might have their hands in the pockets of people that have a lot of power, I would think that argument would ultimately win the day. You've mentioned maybe that these preemptive pardons might just collapse legally. Is there any other way to override or work around a presidential pardon of this nature?
Peter Schweitzer
Well, some people, like Professor Alan Dershowitz, professor emeritus of law at Harvard, has said that this actually creates problems for the Biden family. These pardons do, because now when you are asked questions by congressional committee or by Department of Justice lawyers, you cannot plead the Fifth Amendment because, of course, the Fifth Amendment prevents you from self incrimination. Now, if you are exempt from being prosecuted for these crimes, you presumably cannot plead the Fifth Amendment. So it may actually make things harder for the Biden family in terms of actually having to answer questions. But the key thing is those questions have to be asked. The Department of Justice under Pam Bonney, who I think is going to be confirmed and by the congressional oversight committees, need to proceed. This is not about retribution. It's not about being vindictive. That certainly seems to be what people have accused Trump of doing. But if you look at his first term as president, he certainly did not prosecute Hillary Clinton or anyone else. And there's no reason to believe that that would be taking place here. It's simply trying to get clarification and facts of what actually transpired and what these Chinese, Russian and Ukrainian entities actually got in exchange for sending millions of dollars to Joe Biden's family.
John Bickley
You bring up Pam Bondi. Judging by the Cabinet picks so far from Trump, what's the sense you get about the priority he's laid out of weeding out government corruption? Do you feel that they're fully invested in this project?
Peter Schweitzer
I think that's going to be the central question, John, going forward, because you have these large institutions, the Department of Defense, for example, or the CIA. These are entities that there's a reason people them the deep state, because they're deeply embedded within those bureaucracies. So you're going to have somebody who is confirmed as the Sec def or as the CIA director who is going to be having to deal with bureaucracies that are trying to counteract what you're doing. It's very hard to fight that kind of trench warfare at the same time as you're carrying out policies to deal with, say, the threat from China or the threat from Russia. So that is going to be the defining issue. But I think it is the battle that has to be fought because it comes down to question of are we actually governed by the people we elect that we have chosen to represent us, or are government decisions being made by unelected bureaucrats, and are those unelected bureaucrats involved at some level in corruption? And I think the history of our country demonstrates that absolutely they are. So to me, this is the marquee issue, and it's a reflection of this broader concern that I have of what I call the globalization of corruption. When we think of corruption, we think of the, you know, the guy who's got a paving business back in some congressional district, who wants some highway, federal highway dollars steered his way by the congressman. What we're talking about is foreign governments, in some cases those that are hostile to the United States, giving money to our elected officials and getting something in return. So this is not just rank and file corruption, which is bad enough. This is globalized corruption. And it's only going to get worse, not better, unless we actually do something about it.
John Bickley
Yeah, I think you're right. What do you expect to see in the coming weeks and months from the White House and the Republican led Congress related to Biden family corruption and other sorts of government level corruption issues.
Peter Schweitzer
Well, I think on Capitol Hill, the House Oversight Committee, Jim Comer, I think, has done an excellent job. He's fact based, he's driven, and he's prepared to name names, which is the key in the investigation. So I expect a lot of activities in the House of Representatives and I think in the Department of Justice in the next several weeks, you're gonna see a series of review by senior attorneys at DOJ under Pam Bondi, making decisions about some of the very controversial things that have happened with regard to, say, Tony Fauci, who apparently lied before congressional committees. What is the legal standard for lying before Congress? Did he cross that line and is there a reason to open an investigation and to bring him in to ask him questions about that? So I think there's going to be a little bit of quiet before the storm because again, when you're dealing with these legal matters, you want to make sure that you are, are, you know, crossing all the T's and dotting the I's, because what gets you into trouble is when you don't do the prep work. And Bondi certainly has a reputation for doing her prep work.
John Bickley
Yeah, I think there's no arguing she's someone who comes prepared. Final question, what do you expect from the Biden family going forward? Will they withdraw from public life or try to stay politically relevant?
Peter Schweitzer
Well, I think one of the unanswered questions about the Biden family and again, if you look at the pardons that were issued to Hunter Biden and the family, they run up specifically through December of last year. So any crimes that would have been committed in 2024 would be covered as well. And you wonder, well, what does that mean? Well, that could be the Hunter Biden art deals that were very controversial. But I also think it's worth looking at this period when, you know, Joe Biden had that disastrous debate performance with Donald Trump and he spent about four or five weeks refusing to get out of the race and Hunter Biden moved into the White House, I believe, I don't have evidence to confirm this, believe that the Biden family negotiated financial deals to secure his exit from that race. Whether that crosses the legal line and is illegal, I don't know. But I think that is worth looking into as well. It certainly fits their pattern of monetizing things. It certainly makes sense that Hunter Biden was at the center of it. That's where a lot of this money would flow through and that would, of course, raise questions about what they might be doing in the post presidential years and the money they might be living off of in this case case.
John Bickley
Intriguing questions and hopefully we do get some answers and Congress does pursue what I think the American people deserve to know has actually happened here. Peter, thank you so much for joining us.
Peter Schweitzer
It's always a pleasure. Thanks, John.
John Bickley
That was bestselling author and Gai president Peter Schweitzer. And this has been a weekend edition of MORNING wire.
Morning Wire Podcast Summary: “Schweitzer: Truth Behind Biden’s Family Pardons” | January 26, 2025
Hosted by John Bickley and Georgia Howe, “Morning Wire” delves into the dramatic and controversial preemptive pardons issued by President Joe Biden to his family members. In this episode, John Bickley engages in a comprehensive discussion with Peter Schweitzer, bestselling author and President of the Government Accountability Institute, uncovering the layers of political strategy, legal implications, and potential corruption surrounding these unprecedented actions.
The episode opens with a startling revelation: President Joe Biden, in the final minutes of his presidency, issued preemptive pardons for five of his family members, reigniting intense scrutiny and allegations of corruption within the Biden family.
Joe Biden (00:03): “In the final minutes of his presidency, Joe Biden shocked the political world by issuing preemptive pardons for several of his own family members. The move has sparked renewed calls for investigations into Biden family corruption.”
John Bickley sets the stage for the discussion, highlighting the gravity of the situation and introducing Peter Schweitzer as a key figure in analyzing these developments.
John Bickley (00:16): “In this episode, we sit down with best selling author Peter Schweitzer to discuss the unprecedented Biden family pardons and Republicans plans to follow the money.”
Peter Schweitzer underscores the historic significance of these pardons, emphasizing their uniqueness in American political history.
Peter Schweitzer (01:23): “There's no example in American history of a family member of a sitting president being pardoned, no less. Five members of the family, or six if you include Hunter. Also, these sort of preemptive pardons are really unprecedented as well, and those will probably be tested in court.”
Schweitzer highlights that not only is the act itself unprecedented, but the scope and timing of the pardons—issued preemptively before any charges—are also without precedent.
The discussion delves into the specifics of the pardoned individuals, revealing their ties to various limited liability companies (LLCs) that have received substantial foreign investments.
Peter Schweitzer (01:56): “These are essentially his siblings and their spouses and his son and his daughter. And what's significant is all six of these people are individuals that are connected to LLCs, these limited liability companies that the family had multiple listings of. And these are entities that all received money from these foreign entities.”
Schweitzer points out that the pardons specifically mention crimes occurring after January 1, 2014, a period marked by significant foreign dealings involving China, Ukraine, and Russia.
Peter Schweitzer (01:40): “They receive money from these foreign entities. It's also important to point out, John, that each one of these pardons, whether it's Hunter or the other five family members, the pardon specifically mentions any crimes that occurred beginning after January 1st of 2014.”
Schweitzer argues that the pardons not only protect family members but also shield President Biden himself from potential investigations into influence peddling.
Peter Schweitzer (03:35): “It's self serving, not just something beneficial to his family… it provides a guardrail of protection for him as well.”
This strategic move is seen as a means to safeguard Biden from any allegations of involvement in corruption, especially given his meetings with individuals linked to questionable foreign investments.
Peter Schweitzer presents compelling evidence pointing towards possible corruption within the Biden family, citing substantial foreign funds received without clear legitimacy.
Peter Schweitzer (03:43): “They have collected tens of millions of dollars, some $31 million from these foreign entities and there's no evidence of them giving anything legitimate in return.”
He emphasizes the lack of transparency and the suspicious nature of large financial transactions, particularly those involving foreign governments that are often hostile to the United States.
Peter Schweitzer (08:22): “This is globalized corruption… foreign governments… giving money to our elected officials and getting something in return.”
The pardons face significant legal challenges, with many experts questioning their breadth and validity. Schweitzer discusses how these pardons might be overturned or challenged in court.
Peter Schweitzer (05:06): “It's going to be challenged in court… a lot of legal scholars that say this just simply is too broad because you could essentially, under this construct, provide blanket immunity for a murder that was not discovered until later on.”
Despite the pardons, Congressional investigations are expected to continue, as pardons do not equate to immunity from scrutiny or civil investigations.
Peter Schweitzer (05:06): “Absolutely. They can continue to investigate.”
Schweitzer outlines the Republican strategy to intensify investigations into the Biden family’s financial dealings, emphasizing a thorough examination of foreign funds and their intended purposes.
Peter Schweitzer (10:18): “I expect a lot of activities in the House of Representatives and I think in the Department of Justice in the next several weeks… what actually transpired and what these Chinese, Russian and Ukrainian entities actually got in exchange for sending millions of dollars to Joe Biden's family.”
He highlights the role of key figures like Jim Comer in leading these investigative efforts, aiming to uncover the true extent of corruption and prevent future occurrences.
A significant concern raised is the potential national security threat posed by foreign entities exerting financial influence over American officials.
Peter Schweitzer (08:22): “When we think of corruption… we're talking about foreign governments… hostile to the United States… giving money to our elected officials and getting something in return.”
Schweitzer warns that such “globalized corruption” can undermine American governance and security, stressing the urgency of addressing these issues to maintain national integrity.
Looking ahead, Schweitzer anticipates a surge in investigative actions from both Congress and the Department of Justice under the new leadership of Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Peter Schweitzer (10:18): “...the Department of Justice needs to investigate this. This is not about retribution… it's simply trying to get clarification and facts of what actually transpired.”
He expects meticulous reviews and potential legal actions against individuals like Tony Fauci for alleged misconduct, demonstrating the administration's commitment to rooting out corruption.
The episode concludes with Schweitzer speculating on the Biden family’s likely responses to the ongoing investigations, suggesting they might either withdraw from public life or strive to maintain their political relevance.
Peter Schweitzer (11:32): “One of the unanswered questions about the Biden family… any crimes that would have been committed in 2024 would be covered as well… what does that mean? Well, that could be the Hunter Biden art deals that were very controversial.”
He raises concerns about their future dealings and the possibility of continued financial manipulations to sustain their influence and economic standing.
John Bickley wraps up the discussion by emphasizing the importance of continued investigations to uncover the truth behind the Biden family’s financial activities and prevent future corruption. He underscores the paramount need for transparency and accountability in governance.
John Bickley (12:43): “Intriguing questions and hopefully we do get some answers and Congress does pursue what I think the American people deserve to know has actually happened here.”
Peter Schweitzer echoes this sentiment, reinforcing the necessity of diligent investigative efforts to uphold the integrity of American political institutions.
Final Thoughts
This episode of “Morning Wire” provides a thorough examination of the controversial pardons issued by President Biden, exploring their unprecedented nature, the potential corruption within the Biden family, and the broader implications for American governance and national security. Through insightful analysis and pointed discussions, John Bickley and Peter Schweitzer shed light on the urgent need for accountability and systemic reforms to combat corruption and preserve democratic integrity.