
In her new book The Gay Affair, Dr. Carol Swain exposes the plagiarism scandal involving Harvard’s former president Claudine Gay, and critiques the failures plaguing elite academia. Get the facts first on Morning Wire.
Loading summary
John Bickley
Following now infamous congressional testimony on pervasive antisemitism at Harvard, the university's then president, Claudine Gay, was accused of widespread plagiarism, which ultimately caused her to step down. One of the sources she allegedly drew from was the scholarship of Dr. Carol Swain, who has since written a book documenting the research that was stolen from her and the sequence of events. In this episode, we sit down with Dr. Swain to discuss her case and what she says are the systemic failures plaguing elite academia. I'm Daily Wire Editor in Chief John Bickley with Georgia Howe. It's Saturday, February 1st, and this is a weekend edition of Morning Wire. Joining us now to discuss the alleged plagiarism of her work by Harvard's former president and the academic integrity crisis is Dr. Carol Swain. Dr. Swain, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Carol Swain
Certainly, my pleasure.
John Bickley
Now, in your new book, the Gay Affair, you recount your own experience as a victim of alleged plagiarism by Claudine Gay, Harvard's first black president. First, how did this experience shape your perspective on the systemic failures you critique in the book?
Dr. Carol Swain
Well, I can tell you that discovering that I had been victimized 26 years ago was a shocker. And then the process, what I watched unfold over the next few months, was very eye opening because in the past, when people were caught plagiarizing, if they were journalists, they paid a price, and institutions used to monitor that. But I learned that in the case of Claudine Gay in Harvard, what they did was stand behind her and even try to redefine plagiarism as duplicative language without attribution.
John Bickley
Yeah. Can you walk us through that? We followed it very closely here. But for any listeners who didn't, how exactly did Harvard respond to those accusations that came to light?
Dr. Carol Swain
Well, Claudine Gay was Harvard University's first black president and second woman president, and she served a tenure of six months. And the plagiarism issue, it's my understanding from the reporters who had investigated it that rumors had been swirling around, you know, for years. And before she gave disastrous testimony in the House about antisemitism, there were already people hot on the trail. But the story broke December 10, 2023. This was after her testimony before Congress, along with two other presidents of Ivy League colleges were. Well, when the story broke, initially when I found out about it first, I was not quick to rush to judgment. I thought it could have been an accident that when you're doing a lot of research, maybe you forget to put the Quotation People can make innocent mistakes that were not meant to be plagiarism. And so I read her work and I became deeply troubled. That was my first reaction, deeply troubled. But when Harvard came out, standing behind her, then it began to turn to anger, especially when they tried to redefine plagiarism. Because I knew that with Harvard being a world class university, they would call themselves the world class university. If Harvard redefines plagiarism, it has a downstream effect on every other institution, including K through 12 education. And, and so I started giving interviews. I believe I gave 83 interviews between December 10th and the end of January. All sorts of media. And then when she resigned on January 2nd, and this book, the Gay Affair, Harvard Plagiarism and the Death of Academic Integrity, was timed to be released January 2nd, which is the anniversary of when she resigned. She resigned and she blamed racism. And that was a bridge too far for me.
John Bickley
Yeah, indeed. Now, why do institutions like Harvard, in your opinion, struggle to hold faculty and administrators to the same ethical standards as they hold their students?
Dr. Carol Swain
Well, I mean, that's a serious problem because we know at Harvard, in most institutions, students have been suspended and they have been failed for courses, and they have paid a price. The, the faculty have tenure. And I think institutions decide that they don't want to deal with tenured faculty. But in the case of Claudine Gay, her dissertation is where I found plagiarism of my first book, Black Faces Black the Representation of African Americans in Congress. And you know, when I got my PhD, you had to have original research that had to be defended before a committee. It had to be pathbreaking. And for her to be able to get a PhD from Harvard, win a prize for that PhD and have a rapid rise in academia to become the president of Harvard University, it just speaks volumes about diversity, equity, and inclusion. I believe the fact that her committee did not hold her to high standards. And in the book I talk about first hearing of Claudine Gay and, and the word brilliant usually preceded discussions of her. This brilliant black student at Harvard University. I was on the faculty of Princeton at the time, and I was 10 yet. But all I could hear about was this brilliant black student at Harvard. I did not know Claudine Gay personally, but I believe the fact that she was labeled as brilliant caused those progressive, and I'm gonna say white, progressive, white professors not to look very closely at her work.
John Bickley
So you say the racial factor absolutely played a defining role in terms of how she was treated differently in this from day one.
Dr. Carol Swain
Some People would say, well, you know, it sounds like you're jealous. Well, I observed this thing. I know how hard I had to work to get my degree and to get my promotions. And this thing with Claudine Gay, she went to Phillips Exeter for her high school and her undergraduate education includes Princeton and Stanford. Her bachelor's degree is from Stanford and then she went to get her Ph.D. from Harvard. She has 11 articles, I believe. And that was the basis of her being given tenure at Stanford and then also Harvard becoming a full professor at Harvard, a name chaired full professor that that would not have gotten her tenure at a tier one school. When I earned my tenure at Princeton, you had to have path breaking work. Yeah.
John Bickley
For those not familiar with the kinds of standards that usually would be required for this level of an appointment, what would you normally expect in terms of productivity?
Dr. Carol Swain
It was not the quantity as much as the quality. And you had to have path breaking pioneering work to earn tenure. And they expected a book. Black Faces, Black Interests was my tenure book. And so normally that was the standard at Harvard, at Princeton, at Columbia, all of these places for the social sciences, you had to have a path breaking book. Claudine Gay never had a path breaking book. And according to some of the researchers, there have been allegations that three quarters of her work was plagiarized. And in the case of my work, and I talk about it in the book, the book is not just about Claudine and Harvard, it's also about plagiarism more broadly in journalism and academia. And the fact that copyright law doesn't really protect intellectual property. For situations like what I encountered because I tried to pursue the legal route and it became very clear that copyright law was not, not going to work for me and it could work against me because under copyright law it's loser pays. And for someone without deep pockets, you go up against Harvard University, they have a $50 billion endowment. 50 plus billion dollar endowment. It's an un, even impossible battle even to have a court case against them would cost an individual between 100,000 and 250,000. And I was not deterred by that initially. But in the book I talk about a discussion I had with a law professor at Vanderbilt, the former colleague, and he pointed out to me the risk in a way that I could really grasp what I was about to walk into. And then I realized that I could lose because I couldn't control which judge would actually get my case. I've seen enough lawfare against conservatives to know that even with the judge there was a risk. Loser pays. And I was not about to use my retirement money and my Social Security to pay Harvard's lawyers.
John Bickley
Yeah. So really, there's a sense that they can do this with impunity because of this imbalance, as you say, financially, like you noted, your book broadens out. It's not just about Claudine Gay, obviously, it's about a larger systemic problem. You use the phrase the death of academic integrity writ large. Can you expand on that?
Dr. Carol Swain
We see that universities are no longer respected institutions. In fact, I've seen some surveys where a majority of parents and students say that a college education is not a good investment. I think it has to do with the fact that we see just so much chaos and dysfunction coming from academia. I would say some of the worst ideas that have impacted our society came out of academic academia. We occasionally get list of National Science foundation or National Endowment of the Humanities, studies that were funded, of ludicrous ideas that were funded using taxpayer dollars. And in the case of plagiarism, you know, most people who are educated and you don't have to have a college degree, I believe they start teaching about plagiarism in middle school. And certainly by the time you're in high school, you know about citing sources and what' and what isn't. And so that's always been the standard. You don't steal other people's intellectual property. But when it started disadvantaging elite institutions, they have started redefining the rules. And there have been plenty of white plagiarists. You know, we can name Doris Kearns Goodwin and Stephen Ambrose, Kevin Cruz. And these are some people that were caught. In fact, I dedicate my book to these people for drawing attention to the problem of plagiarism. But DEI seems to have worsened it in the sense that many of the people that Christopher Ruffo and Aaron Burnett identified happened to be racial and ethnic minorities, and universities just turned a blind eye to it.
John Bickley
Yeah, you described plagiarism as a disease in higher education. Now we have the rise of generative AI that can just write papers for you. Where do you see this going in the coming years?
Dr. Carol Swain
I think with AI that it writes in a particular kind of style, and it may take more work on the part of the professor, but I believe that you can craft assignments or identify which papers are written by AI, and it's going to be more difficult. I think what we need to do is somehow bring back a sense of integrity, moral ethics to the whole enterprise of academia. Because right now it's in a sad State. And for people whose kids get into the Ivy League, they want to brag about it, those are not bragging points anymore. Your child is better off probably going to a state university where they adhere to traditional approaches to education than they are at an Ivy League school where they think they are morally superior to everyone else. And they turn a blind eye to violations of traditional norms.
John Bickley
Beyond the specifics of the case that involves you and some of these other high profile plagiarism cases, you also highlight broader implications for academia worldwide. What do you see as the most urgent steps institutions must take to safeguard academic integrity?
Dr. Carol Swain
Well, I'd like to speak to Harvard alumni and people who care about the Ivy League, because whether we like it or not, and I hope this changes, most of our Supreme Court justices and newspaper editors, people in powerful positions, are educated at Ivy League institutions. I would like to see Ivy League institutions make a commitment to high standards. And one of the things that they all need to do and not just the Ivy League. I would recommend every college or university that's been in existence for more than 100 years, read the founding documents, the mission statements, the visions of the people who decided that they wanted to create that particular institution because they have lost all sense of where they came from, any sense of purpose. They are adrift, and they're part of the problem. Instead of lifting up nations, they're helping destroy nations. And I know what I'm saying is strong, but I do believe this. And I would like to see Harvard University make a commitment to high standards, make a commitment to veritas, its motto. Go back to seeking truth.
John Bickley
Final question. I fear I know the answer to this already. Have you gotten any apologies at all from anyone involved?
Dr. Carol Swain
No. And I can tell you that as far as I'm concerned with Harvard, they added insult to injury because they totally ignored me. And Claudine Gay did go back and make some corrections of other people's work that was plagiarized. In the book, I mentioned that there were 47 instances of plagiarism that were identified by researchers, and she only corrected a handful of those. Nothing regarding my work was corrected. But I've said in the book that if she had picked up the phone and called me and apologized, that I would have accepted her apology. And I see Claudine Gay as a victim of a system that pushes racial and ethnic minorities really hard, far beyond where some of them should go. But the issue of pleasurism is not confined to racial and ethnic minorities. It's something that elites do. Joe Biden did it Teddy Kennedy. I mean, we can go down the list of people that cheat. It's all about cheating. And we need to live in a society where that's frowned upon rather than excused away.
John Bickley
Well, let's hope we can get there. Dr. Swain, thank you so much for talking with us.
Dr. Carol Swain
Thank you.
John Bickley
That was Dr. Carol Swain talking about her new book, the Gay Affair, Harvard Plagiarism and the Death of Academic Integrity. And this has been a weekend edition of Morning Wire.
Morning Wire Podcast Summary
Episode: The Gay Affair: Exposing Harvard's Integrity Crisis | 2.1.25
Release Date: February 1, 2025
Hosts: John Bickley and Georgia Howe
Guest: Dr. Carol Swain
Duration: Approximately 15 minutes
In this compelling episode of Morning Wire, hosted by John Bickley and Georgia Howe, the spotlight is cast on a significant scandal shaking the foundations of elite academia. Titled "The Gay Affair: Exposing Harvard's Integrity Crisis," the episode delves deep into allegations of widespread plagiarism against Harvard University's former president, Claudine Gay. Central to this discussion is Dr. Carol Swain, whose scholarly work is at the heart of these accusations.
The episode opens with John Bickley addressing the recent fallout surrounding Harvard's then president, Claudine Gay. Following her infamous congressional testimony on pervasive antisemitism at Harvard, Gay faced severe accusations of plagiarism, leading to her resignation after a mere six months in office. John states:
"[...] the university's then president, Claudine Gay, was accused of widespread plagiarism, which ultimately caused her to step down." [00:03]
These allegations center on claims that Gay plagiarized significant portions of her work, including the scholarship of Dr. Carol Swain.
Dr. Carol Swain, a respected academic and author, shares her harrowing experience of being accused of plagiarism by Claudine Gay. Reflecting on her discovery, Swain remarks:
"Discovering that I had been victimized 26 years ago was a shocker. And then the process, what I watched unfold over the next few months, was very eye opening..." [01:12]
She recounts the initial suspicion and her subsequent realization that her work had been appropriated without proper attribution. Swain emphasizes the gravity of the situation:
"But when Harvard came out, standing behind her, then it began to turn to anger, especially when they tried to redefine plagiarism." [01:53]
Harvard University's reaction to the plagiarism accusations has been a point of contention. Dr. Swain criticizes the institution for its unwavering support of Gay, even attempting to alter the conventional understanding of plagiarism. She explains:
"Harvard redefines plagiarism, it has a downstream effect on every other institution, including K through 12 education." [01:53]
Swain details how Harvard not only defended Gay but also sought to mitigate the severity of her actions by reinterpreting what constitutes plagiarism.
A significant portion of the discussion centers on the broader systemic issues plaguing elite academic institutions. Dr. Swain argues that Harvard's handling of the situation is symptomatic of deeper problems within academia, particularly concerning accountability and ethical standards among faculty and administrators. She states:
"I believe institutions decide that they don't want to deal with tenured faculty." [04:20]
Swain contrasts the strict accountability measures imposed on students with the leniency afforded to tenured faculty, highlighting a double standard that undermines academic integrity.
Dr. Swain delves into how Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives may inadvertently compromise academic standards. She posits that the emphasis on diversity can lead to lowered expectations and diminished scrutiny of minority faculty's work. Swain articulates:
"DEI seems to have worsened it in the sense that many of the people that [...], happened to be racial and ethnic minorities, and universities just turned a blind eye to it." [11:20]
She further critiques how labeling individuals as "brilliant" based on their diversity status can lead to complacency in upholding scholarly rigor.
Addressing emerging challenges, Dr. Swain discusses the impact of generative AI on academic integrity. She expresses concern over the ease with which AI can produce written work, potentially exacerbating plagiarism issues:
"What we need to do is somehow bring back a sense of integrity, moral ethics to the whole enterprise of academia." [11:31]
Swain emphasizes the necessity of reinventing academic assessments and reinforcing ethical standards to combat the misuse of AI in scholarly work.
Expanding the conversation beyond the immediate scandal, Dr. Swain highlights the deteriorating reputation of higher education institutions. She points out that surveys indicate a declining belief in the value of college education, attributing this trend to widespread chaos and dysfunction within academia. Swain advocates for a return to institutional missions and founding principles:
"Read the founding documents, the mission statements, the visions of the people who decided that they wanted to create that particular institution because they have lost all sense of where they came from." [12:47]
She calls for a recommitment to truth and high ethical standards to restore trust in educational institutions.
In wrapping up the episode, the conversation turns to the lack of accountability and apologies from institutions like Harvard. Dr. Swain laments the absence of redress and underscores the broader societal implications of tolerating academic dishonesty:
"It's all about cheating. And we need to live in a society where that's frowned upon rather than excused away." [15:15]
John Bickley echoes the sentiment, expressing hope for a future where integrity is paramount in academia and beyond.
Notable Quotes:
This episode of Morning Wire offers a critical examination of academic integrity at one of the world's most prestigious universities. Through the lens of Dr. Carol Swain's experiences and insights, listeners gain a deeper understanding of the systemic challenges facing higher education today and the urgent need for meaningful reforms.