Transcript
A (0:00)
This episode is brought to you by Jack Daniels. Jack Daniels and music are made for each other. They share a rhythm in the craft of making something timeless while being a part of legendary nights. From backyard jams to sold out arenas, there's a song in every toast. Please drink responsibly. Responsibility.org, jack Daniels and Old no. 7 are registered trademarks. Tennessee whiskey, 40% alcohol by volume. Jack Daniel Distillery, Lynchburg, Tennessee.
B (0:27)
Tomorrow is Columbus Day, and in honor of that, we have Michael Knowles, the host of the Michael Knowles show and resident expert on Christopher Columbus, joining us now. Hey, Michael, I wanted to get your perspective on this. Curious. One thing if it's changed over the years. So we've had a lot of criticism of Columbus and it's really ramped up in recent decades. This has started a while back, but now it's really amplified where you hear nothing but negatives. Do the critics have any, you know, merit to some of their complaints about him?
C (1:01)
No, they don't. Though I'm thrilled to be here as the Italian correspondent of the Daily Roy. I'm the only one with some of that swarthy DNA. Some of that's paint on, but it's. Yes, that's right. I love Columbus. I have defended him for a long time. And you're right, there have been waves of attacks, the most recent kicking off again in 2006. And the spate of headlines that inaugurated this was the suggestion that a new document uncovered that Columbus was really a terrible, no good, dirty run scoundrel. And there was some document that was circulating around the time in 2006. What they didn't tell you about the document, though, is that the document was authored by Francisco de Bobadilla, who was Columbus's chief political rival. So it would be like saying, hey, we now know the truth about Donald Trump. Look at this tweet by Hillary Clinton. Now we know. And ironically, Columbus, I think, has been maligned in part because he wasn't a particularly shrewd Machiavellian politician. And so his political rivals, he was the greatest navigator ever. He was an intrepid, deeply faithful man to whom we owe much of our civilization. But he was not the most conniving politician. And so he was outflanked by other political rivals. And ironically, Carol Delaney, the Stanford historian, makes this point. Columbus is blamed for things that other people did. So when Columbus arrives, he explicitly tells the Spaniards not to mistreat the natives. For instance, the Taino Indians who they first encounter later settlers did in fact mistreat the Indians Columbus would often intervene on their behalf and try to save their lives or prevent them from being otherwise brutalized. But he was blamed for that anyway. He was blamed for things that the other people did. I think that the attacks on Columbus these days are less about some new document being discovered. They're certainly less about the historical record. What they're really about is this broader cultural impulse to denigrate our own past, the people who built our civilization, which is a kind of a suicidal ideology that is really divorced from the history.
