Loading summary
LifeLock Ad
This episode is brought to you by LifeLock. Between two factor authentication, strong passwords and a VPN, you try to be in control of how your info is protected. But many other places also have it and they might not be as careful. That's why Lifelock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats. If your identity is stolen, they'll fix it, guaranteed or your money back. Save up to 40% your first year. Make visit lifelock.com podcast for 40% off. Terms apply.
John Bickley
Vladimir Putin holds a three hour meeting with the White House envoy to discuss a ceasefire as Trump punishes India for buying Russian oil.
Unnamed Analyst
Putin will stop killing people if you get energy down another $10 a barrel. He's going to have no choice because his economy stinks.
John Bickley
I'm Daily Wire Executive Editor John Bickley. Georgia Howe is off today. It's Thursday, August 7th, and this is Morning Wire. Trump takes aim at the practice of debanking by ending discrimination for political or religious beliefs.
Ryan Bangert
No one should be denied access to financial services simply because of their political or their religious belief.
John Bickley
And NASA accelerates plans to build a nuclear reactor on the moon.
Cabot Phillips
Nuclear power in space is really important for any human exploration beyond low Earth orbit.
John Bickley
Thanks for waking up with Morning Wire. Stay tuned. We have the news you need to know.
Vanta Ad
In today's fast changing digital world, proving your company is trustworthy isn't just important for growth, it's essential. That's exactly why Vanta exists, to make building and maintaining that trust seamless for businesses everywhere. Whether you're a startup just getting started with your first SoC2, HIPAA or ISO 27001 certification, or you're an enterprise dealing with the complexity of vendor risk management. Vanta's trust management platform uses industry leading AI and automation, helps companies of all sizes get compliant fast and actually stay that way. The doesn't just handle compliance either. It can help you knock out those tedious security questionnaires up to five times faster, which means you're closing bigger deals sooner and the impact is real. According to a recent IDC study, Vanta customers are saving over half a million dollars annually while becoming three times more productive. If you're ready to see how Vanta can transform your compliance process and help you build Trust automatically, visit vanta.commorningwire to sign up for a free demo today. That's V A N T A.com Morningwire today.
John Bickley
U.S. special Envoy Steve Witkoff met with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday. The new discussions come as President Trump's deadline for peace fast approaches Daily Wire reporter Tim Pierce is here to talk about the latest in the Ukraine war and how propaganda has twisted news on the war in Gaza. Hey, Tim. So let's start with Russia. Big meeting yesterday, a lot of eyes on it. What exactly took place?
Tim Pierce
Well, we don't know anything concrete, but there were some positive signals. Now, this was a nearly three hour meeting and there was a lot of interest in how it was framed by the two sides. President Trump put out a statement shortly after, calling the meeting highly productive and saying great progress was made. The Kremlin had a similar take, describing the meeting as useful and constructive. More discussions are expected. Trump said he intends to meet personally with Putin as soon as next week and then bring Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky together. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had more to say.
Sean Duffy
There's going to be a deal to end this war. It'll have to require the President to come in at the end and close on it, as I've seen him do numerous times now.
Tim Pierce
Lately, Trump has been frustrated with the pace of peace negotiations and what he sees as Russia's refusal to deal. Honestly, a few weeks ago, Trump gave Putin a 50 day deadline to come to a ceasefire, but last week bumped that timeline up to this Friday. According to reports, Putin isn't ready yet to agree to a ceasefire, much less an end to the war. But he may agree to de escalate some with a pause on airstrikes. Meanwhile, however, Russia has conducted joint naval drills with China and most recently practiced taking out an enemy submarine just a few days after Trump repositioned a few US Nuclear subs over comments by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.
John Bickley
Right. That move got a lot of attention, just like Trump intended it to. Now we saw right after the meeting, Trump ratchet up tariffs on India. What did that accomplish?
Tim Pierce
Yeah, the White House wants to put pressure on Russia by going after its source of funding, the foreign countries that are buying its oil. Here's the Director of the National Economic Council, Kevin Hassett, explaining that I think.
Unnamed Analyst
The President has decided that it doesn't. India should not be the release valve for Russia and that one reason why the Russia, Ukraine war might be going on for so long is that Russia has a release valve through India where it could sell its stuff. And so the President is serious about getting peace in Ukraine and Russia. And I think that getting a better understanding of India's role is what's moved him to this, to this move.
Tim Pierce
To that end, Trump signed an order on Wednesday to lift tariffs on goods from India 25%, which would bring the total US tariff on India to 50%, among the highest Trump has imposed. That order is scheduled to go into effect in three weeks on August 27th.
John Bickley
All right, so that's coming in just a few weeks now in another major conflict around the world, we have this situation in Gaza and a lot of propaganda and just outright false reporting, including from the New York Times. Tell us about that.
Tim Pierce
Right. There's been a lot of flawed narratives around the food situation in Gaza, which is bad, but it needs context. The best example came courtesy of the New York Times. Last month, the Times ran a front page story on starvation in Gaza under a feature photo of an emaciated child. The caption said the child was born healthy, but come to find out he suffered from pre existing conditions. There was of course, a blow up at the Times over this. Based on its own reporting, finding an image that captures the desperation of the Gaza people shouldn't be hard to find. Now, obviously conditions in Gaza are terrible, but one of the allegations in the Times report is that Israel is blocking food and aid into Gaza, but that that isn't true. The U. S backed Gaza Humanitarian foundation ships hundreds of tons of aid into Gaza every day. The problem is most of the aid is stolen by Hamas. Even according to the United nations, one of the most vocal critics of Israel on this, nearly 90% of all of its aid trucks are looted by Hamas or intercepted by civilians. Starvation is a Hamas tactic. Here's a Gaza native saying as much on msnbc.
Unnamed Gaza Native
Nevertheless, they very much so fell into a trap of Hamas's design. Hamas wanted to see the deterior of the humanitarian conditions in Gaza, knowing full well that this may be the only hope for drawing in the international community for producing horrendous imagery that showcased the war as being a humanitarian catastrophe and therefore hoping to bring about a rapid end to the war that it started and it has an ultimate responsibility to end.
Tim Pierce
So yes, there is a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, but we need to understand the nature of it accurately or more than likely the whole thing gets much worse.
Unnamed Analyst
Right.
John Bickley
In situations like this, accurate reporting is more important than ever. Tim, thanks for reporting.
Tim Pierce
Good to be on.
John Bickley
The White House is preparing an executive order banning banks from cutting off customers based on their religious or political beliefs. This debanking trend grew under the Biden administration alongside the rise in social media censorship. Joining us now to discuss is Ryan Bangert, Senior Vice President for Strategic Initiatives at Alliance Defending Freedom. Ryan, thanks for coming on.
Ryan Bangert
My pleasure, thank you for having me.
John Bickley
So first, how did this executive order come about and was it needed?
Ryan Bangert
Well, John, it's very needed. And I think there are very few things we can all agree on in America today, but one of them is that no one should be denied access to financial services simply because of their political or their religious beliefs. Unfortunately, what we've seen is over the past several years, regulators in particular have pressured financial institutions to do just that. And ADF has been working on this issue now for some time. And I can say this action is just in the nick of time.
John Bickley
Now the claim from the left is that this is not happening. This is a myth. It's all technical reasons that people are getting debanked. You're arguing that this is absolutely needed. It's been happening and there has been a rising trend, Is that correct?
Ryan Bangert
Well, that's true. And just look at the facts that we've seen play out over the last several years. Just last year in 2024, the US Supreme Court decided a case, National Rifle association vs Vulo, in which the New York Department of Financial Services was alleged to have pressured financial institutions, banks and insurers to remove services from the National Rifle association as well as gun manufacturers, simply because Maria Vullo, who at that time was running dfs, was very anti second Amendment. And so right there in the US Supreme Court, we saw this play out in real time. We also saw the House Select Committee on the Weaponization of Government. A select subcommittee on Weaponization of Government last year released a report showing Treasury Department officials pressuring banks to surveil customers who had purchased items at places like Bass Pro Shops, Cabela's other sporting goods stores. But beyond that, they were providing guidance to financial institutions to surveil transactions with groups identified by far left pressure organizations as hate groups, groups including the Alliance Defending Freedom. So we know it's happening. There's evidence that it's happening. It's been documented copiously by the US Supreme Court, by the Congressional Committee on Select Subcommittee on Weaponization. So this is not really up for debate.
John Bickley
Now we have seen some states take action, Tennessees among them, to eliminate this kind of behavior. What have we seen in terms of the national movement leading up to this executive order?
Ryan Bangert
We have seen some positive movement, especially you mentioned Tennessee. ADF has a client in Tennessee, Indigenous Advance Ministries, whose bank account was withdrawn by bank of America. And the reasons given were they simply didn't want to do business with an organization like that. So that's clearly an instance where reputational risk or social risk policies are being applied. And that's really the Avenue through which a lot of these banks are imposing debanking. But Tennessee passed a law that prohibited this kind of political or ideological debanking. Idaho has also recently passed just such a law. And we've seen some movement on the part of banks. JPMorgan Chase, to their credit, recently revised their social risk policies in response to pressure that was brought to bear after Ambassador Sam Brownback's organization, ncrf, was debanked. So we have seen some positive movement both from state lawmakers as well as from industry itself.
John Bickley
Are there any concerns that this executive order could overcorrect and actually infringe on the free operating principles of private businesses, the banks?
Ryan Bangert
Certainly, John. I haven't seen the executive order yet, but certainly things that have been reported in the media and things that ADF has been advocating for would be the federal regulators removing onerous reputational risk policies that are really covers for ideological and political debanking. There's no risk that that's going to infringe on any kind of business or commercial rights because those have been abused for years now. So I'm not terribly concerned. I think this is a badly needed correction. And I think it also will be helpful to banks because banks, quite frankly, have been laboring under pressure from leftists and elitists in government who are trying to impose their political will through the regulatory process. And so removing that kind of pressure, I think will be a relief not only to the organizations that have been targeted, but to the banks themselves.
John Bickley
Well, as you've laid out, this issue has gained a lot of attention in recent years. A lot of people anxious to see this new order. Ryan, thanks so much for coming on.
Ryan Bangert
Thank you for having me.
John Bickley
A new space race is underway with the Trump administration announcing plans to build a nuclear reactor on the moon. Daily Wire senior editor Cabot Phillips has the details on this pretty ambitious plan. A gabbit. So this sounds like science fiction. At first when you pitched it to me, I actually kind of laughed. This, this is real.
Cabot Phillips
It's very real. I love this story. It is like something from a science fiction novel. But the Trump administration is very serious. This week, acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy issued a directive to build a nuclear reactor, as you said, on the surface of the moon by the year 2030. So they're moving fast. The reactor itself will be a small one, about 100 kilowatts. That is enough to power 80 homes here on Earth. At the moment, no such mini react has been approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and to the best of our knowledge, none have yet been built. But President Trump has made clear that this technology is a top priority for NASA. He signed a number of executive orders expediting the regulatory and commercialization process for those microreactors. And now we know why he wants to put them on the moon. Duffy says they'll begin accepting private sector proposals for the plan within 60 days and then appoint an official to oversee the project within 30 days. So, again, this is all going to happen very quickly.
John Bickley
And we've heard a lot about these mini reactors, so here we go. This one's really ramped up to timeline. What is the reason for this sense of urgency here?
Cabot Phillips
China and Russia, that's pretty simple. This year, both countries announced their intentions to put their own reactors on the moon. By the mid-2030s, though, China seems to have a much better likelihood of making it happen. Secretary Duffy says that it is crucial, though, that we beat them there. Otherwise Beijing or Moscow could, quote, declare a keep out zone, which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a base of our own. Here he is speaking about this new space race earlier this week.
Sean Duffy
We're in a race to the moon. In a race with China to the moon. And to have a base on the moon, we need energy. There's a certain part of the moon that everyone knows is the best. We have ice there, we have sunlight there. We want to get there first and claim that for America.
John Bickley
So why is NASA focusing on nuclear energy in particular?
Cabot Phillips
Well, first, it's important to remember a day on the moon lasts about four weeks. Here on Earth, there's two weeks of continual sunshine and then two weeks of continual darkness. That means it is nearly impossible for solar panels to get enough juice, and batteries simply will not provide enough power for long term operations. That leaves nuclear energy as the most cost effective and efficient option.
John Bickley
All right, so that makes sense, but why the need for this energy anyway?
Cabot Phillips
Yeah, that is the big question. So this is all part of NASA's Artemis program, which is basically the modern day Apollo at the moment. NASA's hoping to send four astronauts into lunar orbit by 2026. And then by 27, they want to land a crew back on the moon for the first time since 1972. And the agency is also working to construct a lunar space station and then eventually a long term base on the moon. This reactor will power that eventual station and it'll also serve as an important operations center for future longer missions, mainly to Mars. Because the moon has one sixth the gravity of Earth, it's a lot easier and cheaper to launch craft from there. Think of a lunar base as a sort of staging base for deep space exploration. Here's Secretary Duffy making that point.
Sean Duffy
We're going to set up our base camp. We're going to stay on the moon. And what we learn on the moon is what's going to take us to Mars. And again, as Americans, we're explorers. You think of the pioneers, you think of those who moved west. That's what we do.
Cabot Phillips
And it's worth noting, while the administration says this mission is purely about exploration and it sounds like a lot of fun stuff, there are plenty of folks who believe this could also all have military implications as well. While no country has acknowledged it publicly, there is a high likelihood that at least some of our adversaries have secretly launched weaponized satellites into orbit. Last year, for example, Space Force reported that a number of Chinese satellites were observed moving in controlled formations consistent with dog fighting. And before that, US Intelligence reported the presence of Russian satellites that appeared to be armed with weapon systems of their own. So you can see why an increased presence in space, including a lunar base, would be of interest to the Pentagon and not just NASA.
John Bickley
One step closer to real life. Star Wars.
Sean Duffy
Exactly.
John Bickley
Thanks for reporting.
Cabot Phillips
Absolutely.
John Bickley
Thanks for waking up with us. And if you're watching on YouTube, don't forget to like and subscribe. We'll be back this evening with more news you need to know.
Unnamed Host
These are questions that take cultures thousands of years to answer. During Answer the Call, I take questions from people just like you about their problems, opportunities, challenges, or when they simply need advice.
Ryan Bangert
How do I balance all of this grief, responsibility?
Tim Pierce
How do you repair this kind of damage?
Unnamed Host
My daughter Michaela guides the conversations as we hopefully help people navigate their lives. Everyone has their own destiny. Everyone.
Release Date: August 7, 2025
Hosts: John Bickley and Georgia Howe
Podcast: Morning Wire by The Daily Wire
The episode opens with a significant international development where U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff engaged in a nearly three-hour meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss a potential ceasefire in the ongoing Ukraine conflict.
John Bickley introduces the topic: “Vladimir Putin holds a three hour meeting with the White House envoy to discuss a ceasefire as Trump punishes India for buying Russian oil.” ([00:34])
Tim Pierce, Daily Wire reporter, provides insights: “President Trump put out a statement shortly after, calling the meeting highly productive and saying great progress was made.” ([02:53])
Despite optimistic statements from both the U.S. and Kremlin, Pierce notes skepticism regarding the actual outcomes: “Putin isn't ready yet to agree to a ceasefire, much less an end to the war.” ([03:32])
Sean Duffy, an unnamed analyst, adds context to the negotiations: “Putin will stop killing people if you get energy down another $10 a barrel. He's going to have no choice because his economy stinks.” ([00:42])
The discussion highlights Trump's frustration with the slow pace of peace talks and Russia's reluctance to compromise. Furthermore, recent Russian naval drills with China indicate ongoing military preparedness, potentially undermining ceasefire efforts.
In response to India's continued purchase of Russian oil, President Trump has taken decisive economic action to pressure Russia by targeting one of its key revenue sources.
John Bickley outlines the move: “Trump ratchet up tariffs on India.” ([04:18])
Tim Pierce explains the strategy: “The White House wants to put pressure on Russia by going after its source of funding, the foreign countries that are buying its oil.” ([04:18])
An unnamed analyst elaborates: “The President is serious about getting peace in Ukraine and Russia. And I think that getting a better understanding of India's role is what's moved him to this, to this move.” ([04:28])
Trump's administration has signed an order to impose a 25% tariff on Indian goods, bringing the total tariff on India to 50%, set to take effect on August 27th.
The podcast addresses the contentious media narratives surrounding the humanitarian situation in Gaza, particularly criticizing the New York Times for misleading reporting.
John Bickley introduces the issue: “We have this situation in Gaza and a lot of propaganda and just outright false reporting, including from the New York Times.” ([05:08])
Tim Pierce critiques the Times’ reporting: “Last month, the Times ran a front page story on starvation in Gaza under a feature photo of an emaciated child. The caption said the child was born healthy, but come to find out he suffered from pre existing conditions.” ([05:21])
A Gaza native on MSNBC comments on Hamas's tactics: “Hamas wanted to see the deterior of the humanitarian conditions in Gaza, knowing full well that this may be the only hope for drawing in the international community for producing horrendous imagery that showcased the war as being a humanitarian catastrophe…” ([06:23])
Pierce emphasizes the need for accurate reporting to prevent further deterioration: “There is a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, but we need to understand the nature of it accurately or more than likely the whole thing gets much worse.” ([06:57])
The discussion shifts to a significant domestic policy move: the White House’s executive order aimed at preventing banks from terminating services based on customers’ political or religious beliefs.
John Bickley introduces the segment: “The White House is preparing an executive order banning banks from cutting off customers based on their religious or political beliefs.” ([07:05])
Ryan Bangert, Senior Vice President for Strategic Initiatives at Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), explains the necessity: “No one should be denied access to financial services simply because of their political or their religious beliefs.” ([07:40])
Bangert references Supreme Court decisions and congressional reports to substantiate claims of ongoing debanking practices:
He highlights state-level actions, such as Tennessee and Idaho passing laws to prohibit political or ideological debanking, and banks like JPMorgan Chase revising their social risk policies due to pressure.
Addressing concerns about potential overreach, Bangert asserts that the executive order is a necessary correction without infringing on legitimate business operations: “Removing that kind of pressure, I think will be a relief not only to the organizations that have been targeted, but to the banks themselves.” ([10:55])
The episode delves into NASA’s accelerated initiative to construct a nuclear reactor on the moon, positioning the U.S. at the forefront of the new space race against China and Russia.
John Bickley introduces the topic: “A new space race is underway with the Trump administration announcing plans to build a nuclear reactor on the moon.” ([11:55])
Cabot Phillips, Senior Editor at Daily Wire, details the plan: “Acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy issued a directive to build a nuclear reactor, as you said, on the surface of the moon by the year 2030.” ([12:13])
The proposed reactor, a 100-kilowatt unit, is intended to power future lunar bases and support extended missions to Mars. Phillips explains the technical rationale: “A day on the moon lasts about four weeks... that leaves nuclear energy as the most cost effective and efficient option.” ([13:56])
The urgency behind this initiative is driven by geopolitical competition:
Phillips also touches on potential military implications, citing unacknowledged weaponized satellites by adversaries: “At least some of our adversaries have secretly launched weaponized satellites into orbit.” ([15:14])
The segment underscores the dual objectives of exploration and national security, positioning the lunar reactor as a cornerstone for America's space ambitions.
In this episode of Morning Wire, John Bickley and guest contributors provide an in-depth analysis of critical geopolitical developments, domestic policy changes, and ambitious scientific endeavors. From high-stakes negotiations with Vladimir Putin and strategic economic pressures on India, to addressing media narratives in Gaza and safeguarding financial inclusivity, the podcast offers a comprehensive overview of current events. Additionally, NASA’s groundbreaking plan to deploy a nuclear reactor on the moon signifies a bold stride in space exploration, highlighting the intersection of science, politics, and national security.
For listeners seeking a nuanced perspective on these pressing issues, Morning Wire delivers factual reporting and insightful commentary, reinforcing its mission to present the news without the influence of mainstream media biases.
Notable Quotes:
“Putin will stop killing people if you get energy down another $10 a barrel. He's going to have no choice because his economy stinks.” — Unnamed Analyst ([00:42])
“No one should be denied access to financial services simply because of their political or their religious belief.” — Ryan Bangert ([07:40])
“We're in a race to the moon. In a race with China to the moon.” — Sean Duffy ([13:38])
“Hamas wanted to see the deterior of the humanitarian conditions in Gaza...” — Unnamed Gaza Native ([06:23])
This summary encapsulates the key discussions and insights from the August 7, 2025, episode of Morning Wire, providing a clear and comprehensive overview for those who have not listened to the full podcast.