Jason Hall (3:03)

Yeah, actually I'm a little surprised here, Jason, because some of those returns are better than I expected. I mean, it's true, I think when a stock is added to an index, there's a certain amount of forced buying that happens when the index does go out, depending on its rebalancing schedule and has to purchase shares, of course. But it's also true that when indexes add stocks to their index, they have to announce it in advance when that change is being made. And so there's like this certain amount of front running that happens from institutional buyers that I think largely has reduced the size of the price movement for stocks after the announcement. But even some of those companies like you just mentioned, Jason, I think there is just a level of credibility that happens when you see an index adding to a business. And in the case of the s and P500, there's certain hoops that companies like Block have to jump through in order to even be eligible. And interestingly for Block, one of those elements is a certain level of profitability. You have to have posted gap profits not only in our most recent quarter, but over the trailing four quarters as well. Right. The trailing year. And in the case of Block, I think if you weren't already a shareholder, this is actually a reason to, to maybe continue to sit on the sidelines if you weren't already interested. Like you mentioned, Jason, this is a company that while performing well, does have a lot of exposure to things like Bitcoin. They have exposure to that on their books that can impact their gap earnings as well as exposure through their Cash app, which is driving a lot of their revenue growth, although a smaller portion of gross profit. All of those things I think make me just a little bit more cautious here as an investor to say it's great to see some institutional buying for Block, but again, I'm not already a shareholder. If I wasn't, then I would not be using this as an opportunity to think either in the short term or in the long term. This is providing some reason for me to go out and buy today. Okay, we'll be back with some thoughts on our newest potential addition to the public markets right after this break.

Emily Flippen (4:52)

This episode is brought to you by Indeed. When your computer breaks, you don't wait.

Sanmeet Deyo (4:58)

For it to magically start working again.

Emily Flippen (5:00)

You fix the problem. So why wait to hire the people your company desperately needs? Use Indeed Sponsored jobs to hire top talent fast. And even better, you only pay for results. There's no need to wait. Speed up your hiring with a $75 sponsored job credit@ Indeed.com podcast terms and conditions apply.

Jason Hall (5:22)

Jason, I'm not sure if you're much of a creative type, but something tells me you're at least familiar with Adobe and the work that this business has done amongst design professionals. I think we'd all have to be living under a rock if we weren't. Well, today we got news that Figma, which is one of Adobe's largest competitors and the business that Adobe tried to Acquire more than three years ago for $20 billion, has priced its IPO and is targeting evaluation that only goes upwards of around $16 billion. I mean, what do you think? What should investors be making of this pricing? Because to be frank, to me, this makes me excited for Adobe, but really skeptical here for figma.

Emily Flippen (5:59)

So I did some professional photography work for about a decade, so I'm really familiar with Adobe' products. I'm also a content creator for the Motley fool, so I spent a lot of time working with many of the latest tools. And for those of us following these businesses and investors, I think the consensus was back when Adobe announced the Figma deal, it was expensive and they were just clearly trying to take a competitive product that they had lost ground to out of the market and add it to their suite of products. And I think the outcome, frankly, the deal falling apart and Adobe having to give its biggest competitor Figma, $1 billion and then figure out how to innovate and compete, I think it's certainly healthier for Adobe's business in the long run. On the other hand, I'm a little bit less willing to view kind of the down round. $14 billion valuation for Figma is really necessarily being bullish for Adobe. But more than just a reminder, this is still a really dynamic, highly competitive space. Since the announcement of the acquisition back in mid September of 2022, Adobe shares are up about 19%. Over that same period, the S&P 500 has gained almost 70% in total returns. The tech heavy NASDAQ 100 has basically doubled. Investors see a legacy software giant that still has a lot of work to do to retain its edge. For instance, I almost exclusively use Canva for graphics and products like Descript and Riverside for video editing. And I think the lesson there is that the good enough but a lot cheaper products are winning out for more casual professional users that don't need that full suite of tools. You know, they just need an ultralight plane, they don't need a 747. I think Adobe's success though is going to be tied to keeping the real professionals empowered with the best suite of tools and unlocking their productivity and creativity with artificial intelligence. And Adobe's way ahead of everybody else taking really big steps there. Thinking that through, if I were picking between Figma and Adobe as an investor right now, I think Adobe is still likely to be the winner and in no small part because the valuation gives a lot more margin of safety to future profits for investors.

Sanmeet Deyo (8:15)

Yeah, you know, I would add that while Figma could definitely be a much more rapidly growing company, it definitely has something that Adobe values because they look to acquire it. But Adobe's been in this business for a very, very long time. The biggest thing for me is that they just generate steady and healthy amounts of free cash flow on a consistent basis. And it does have a competitive threats from Figma, Canva and others. Dolby's primarily been desktop oriented versus now there's more cloud based online services like Figma and Canva. Adobe shifting towards that. So they're already making their moves. Their AI features have been very, very. While Figma could be the case can be made for Figma as a great growth oriented, higher growth, higher risk investment, the safer, more solid bet would be Adobe and you're still getting plenty of growth out of that.

Jason Hall (9:07)

Yeah, I will say at you know, even the low range of this IPO price, Figma's still valued at nearly 17 times sales and the business barely generates profits. So when you talk about the amount of money that is likely going to be need to be invested in things like sales growth and even AI, it might be challenging here for figma but interested to see where this ultimately leads us and leads investors and if Adobe is still threatened by this company a year or five years from now, but we're still in the middle of earnings season here and you know, as much as I think that it's important to talk about earnings. I also think that we shouldn't use it as an opportunity to overshadow maybe a contrarian or highlight a stock idea that some of the quintessential qualities that define rule breaking stocks look for, which includes being a top dog led by a visionary founder. And Jason, I have to talk to you about Roku here because as self indulgent as this is, I will say Roku has been a little bit of a bust for most investors. I mean, shares are down more than 80% from its 2021 highs. And I would argue that I think we've seen a little bit of a turnaround in Roku's business here. I've been on record saying that I think Roku is like Spotify in 2023, but I think I am a little bit of the contrarian. I'm the outside investor who is looking at Roku and getting excited. Most people have been running for the hills. Jason, from your opinion, is Roku potentially a viable stock for contrarian investors or is this really more like digging through the trash as opposed to the bargain bin?

Emily Flippen (10:33)

So I think it's a good business. The core business is really good. I think that's important to acknowledge. And the trends are certainly very favorable with programmatic advertising and when you have a supply of inventory of ads to sell and they're growing that inventory on other platforms as well through their ad network that they're building. But what I've struggled with with Roku for years is as much as I think there's value for user, I think it's potentially capped by what is probably a realistically smaller market for its product than a lot of bulls describe. Despite all of those positive things there and the moves they made to get more inventory in front of more buyers, I think the reality is the Roku brand, I want to be very specific here. The Roku brand, I think it's a lot like peloton to me. And what I mean by that is that there are plenty of loyal users that swear by it, but the majority of people who want to connect a TV or a piece of exercise equipment, if we were to continue with that analogy, they're just transactional or if they're maybe they're already in another ecosystem in the case of this. So things like Apple and Amazon and people are part of those ecosystems for reasons that Roku can't really compete with. So I think it's a good business. I think you're right that it's probably on the cusp of something big in terms of the power of adding scale. But I think again, in terms of scale, I really do think it's more Peloton than Spotify.

Jason Hall (11:57)

This is going to turn into an episode of Dueling Fools. And I actually, I don't disagree with you, but I think it's a bit of the opposite of a situation with Peloton. Peloton was always a brand driven company who needed to drive pricing power and premium prices in order to make money off of its hardware. Whereas Roku purposely is not a brand driven company. They don't want you to necessarily associate with the Roku brand. They sell their TVs and their operating systems at a loss just to get people into the ecosystem. And I think most Americans don't really care what brand their TV is. They just want to buy whatever is the cheapest, most accessible product that suits their needs. And in the case of Roku, they're the largest operating system for TVs in North America. They're more than twice the size of their next largest competitor and that has only gained market share since the company's been public. But you're right that ultimately this is a highly competitive space. We have deals with some of their largest distributors, including Walmart of the world, who has an investment in Vizio. Very easy for other competitors to come in and say, okay, well you know you've been undercutting the Apples and Amazons of the world. I'm going to start undercutting you as well. And a decline in market share here for Roku could be absolutely devastating. So Jason, I will want to hold you to your thoughts on Peloton. It's going to be a stock that I ask you about here in just a minute, but after the break we'll be right back with some of those rapid fire thoughts and bold predictions for popular beaten down stocks of which Peloton is of course 1. Running a business comes with a lot of what ifs, but luckily there's a simple answer to Shopify. It's the commerce platform behind millions of businesses including Thrive Cosmetics and Momofuku. And it'll help you with everything you need. From website design and marketing to boosting sales and expanding operations. Shopify can get the job done and make your dream a reality. Turn those what ifs into sign up for your $1 per month trial@shopify.com specialoffer to wrap up today, I'd love to take a rapid fire round of bold predictions for some of our favorite rule breaking style companies. They've been beaten down to the likes of Roku Maybe we have some contrary opinions on them, but semi. Let's start with Peloton. Their shares have been left for dead, but a new management team and a growing subscription style for revenue could get some investors intrigued. Are you getting on or off this bike?

Sanmeet Deyo (14:13)

I'm getting off. Fitness is a fantastically interesting yet fickle and challenging industry to invest in. And you can take my word for it, as I've invested in a actual brick and mortar franchise. I've invested in Peloton and struck out. I've shot my shot and not made my shots with the fitness industry yet. Yet I still am intrigued by fitness, health and wellness and that whole industry. So one day I'm gonna, I'm gonna catch something. But with Peloton, I think over. It had its run, it had its play. It's just, I don't see anything sustainable that could, that could last with this company. I mean, I would rather venture into something like a planet Fitness, which is cheap gym, offers, has its niche, provides it and provides it well, has been around for a long time and is gaining. Is gaining share and members. So I would stick with something like that.

Emily Flippen (15:07)

Yeah, with. I'll add a little nuance to that. I think there's plenty of sustainability here by refocusing on what's powerful about Peloton and that's creating that platform that users like and keeping. Keeping your engaged users engaged and monetizing those users and getting things like the operating costs of owning factories to build bikes off of their balance sheet and off of their operating costs. You know, they made that move. That was the. They took the big shot sand me to try to take that next step to scale and. Well, remember bowflex? How about P90X? What about Jazzer size? All right, I rest my.

Sanmeet Deyo (15:46)

I still use all of those. Except.

Emily Flippen (15:50)

And the point is, as you said, it's a very fickle industry. Fads come and go and I think that all of those things are still around and they're going to be around for a while. And I think Peloton is going to be around for decades. But is it an investable area? Peter lynch said it best, guys. A great business and a mediocre industry is a mediocre business. And this is a tough, mediocre industry. And value buyers. There's opportunities at time for companies like this and maybe the stock goes up if they keep shrinking costs and get to a steady state. But it's a notoriously fickle industry. Absolutely. In my too hard pile.

Jason Hall (16:19)

Emily, I have to agree here. If I saw subscription Revenue from those loyal customers rising, it'd be one thing, but even that is declining. It's a hard industry to win in. But you know what else is a hard industry to win in? Furniture. And so we have to talk about Wayfair. I mean their shares trade at less than one time sales. And I will say though the home market improves here, maybe there's some near term demand for stocking up all of our houses with some new items. Jason, are you on board the turnaround in Wayfair?

Emily Flippen (16:47)

It's just a furniture and other home goods store and it's online. Congratulations. Your Montgomery Ward. But without the Internet. Now in fairness, retail can be an excellent investment. But you have to be a really good operator and you have to do something better than your competitors with a value proposition that's actually a value. Just a cherry pick. Two primo examples examples TJX companies and Williams Sonoma on two different ends of the spectrum of what they're good at. They're both really, really good. They know why they exist, who they serve and they're exceptional operators. Wayfair doesn't seem like it's really either of those. And frankly I once had high hopes for it.

Sanmeet Deyo (17:29)

I make it really quick with Wayfair. I think it has a fighter's chance. It has an online, a breadth of products and services online. They're trying to make it personalized and customized to users and they're very targeted with their ads to get the right type of customer into their business. But still, still a tough, tough business.

Jason Hall (17:46)

Last but not least, let's talk about Etsy. Which was forced to face reality after its house of brand strategy failed, but new management's trying to turn around. I know I'm not fully sold here, but Jason, do you have any thoughts?

Emily Flippen (17:58)

Yeah, full disclosure. I sold Etsy on March 6. Shares are up a third since then. So I don't really know if I've got much credibility here. But I can tell you why I sold. In short, all of like the stronger business results that we've seen over the past year or so, higher revenue profitability that was coming at the expense of merchants. More recently, customer traffic and merchant counts, they're down gross merchandise sales, that's the volume of revenue across the platform falling. It's a solidly profitable business. If you adjust out the goodwill write down that they took related to reverb generates plenty of cash flow. But if you can't bring more buyers and sellers together in a market where more people want to buy, buy handmade and used items what are we even doing?

Jason Hall (18:40)

Sometimes contrarian investments are contrarian for a reason. We're just not seeing the business performance that we need to make them investable today. Sunmeet Jason, thank you both so much for joining. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley fool may have formal recommendations for or against. So don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows the Motley fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes For Jason Hall, Samit Gayo, and the entire Motley fool money team, I'm Emily Flippen. We'll see you tomorrow.