John Quest (4:01)

Yeah, this anthropic moment is really fascinating because on the one hand this is what everyone has been saying all along, ever since AI really started to take hold of the headlines, that it was going to replace certain softwares. And so we've been expecting this. But on the other hand, everyone's acting surprised. Now in the comparison to Deepseek, I, I'm not certain that the Deep Seq moment is fully over. What Deep Seek showed us is that it's possible maybe to do more with less when it comes to the AI hardware. And, and I would say when you look at the bottlenecks in this industry, it's all physical. There's a lot of physical bottlenecks and I think that that points to a continuation of we need to learn how to do more in AI with less physical components. So I don't think that that trend has fully played out. I think the panic, initial panic, that was what the market was down by and it's like oh, it didn't collapse overnight. I think we might see something similar here with Anthropic. The general trend is pointing towards what Matt said. There is going to be software that is replaced by AI. I think that we saw Anthropic come out with its new products. This is the initial panic to that. I think in coming months and quarters we're going to see, okay, it's not a overnight collapse but I think the general trend is pointing in that direction. And I think that that is why, as Matt said, it's so important to distinguish what software can't we do without. We're going to still go to the software provider and what is AI going to replace?

Host (Tyler Breaux or another main host) (5:39)

Yeah, I find myself landing in a very similar place. You know, the mission critical versus the relatively easy switching cost. You know, when I think of mission critical I think like banking software, you know, Fist Serve, Fidelity National, Jack Henry are kind of companies that I don't really see getting affected by AI nearly as much as just to get. I'm not going to name any names here but like working here at the fool the past several years we've swapped out like pro productivity SaaS, vendors like two to three times and life seems to have gone on with relatively not a whole lot of bumps in the road. And so I, with that in mind I'm going to. I mentioned fistserv, Fidelity National, Jack Henry, I want to put you two on the spot here. I want you to highlight one stock in the software industry where you're not nearly worried about AI disruption.

John Quest (6:26)

For me that is CrowdStrike ticker symbol CRWD. This is a cloud based AI cybersecurity company. I don't think that this is a business that you want to have some internal tech geniuses vibe coding a cybersecurity product to replace it. I don't see that happening. Businesses need cybersecurity. The threats are always increasing. And look, CrowdStrike is a fast growing, hugely profitable business. It does have plenty of resources at its disposal to defend itself. And if you look, shares are flat over the past year down 25% from 52 week high. Maybe still a little bit pricey from a valuation perspective, but if this SaaS sell off intensifies, maybe 2026 will hand investors a very good bargain for CrowdStrike stock.

Matt Frankel (7:14)

Yeah, I love the cybersecurity space here. I like that you brought that up. The one I was going to highlight is Toast T O S T. It just hit a 52 week low today and it's kind of ridiculous that it's sold off so much. It's a business that is so entrenched in its customers businesses, it provides an entire restaurant ecosystem, payroll ordering, delivery payments, mobile apps, many other things that restaurants have historically had to pay dozens of different vendors for. A lot of those are they're not disruptible by just coding. I mean, you're not going to code a new delivery platform that's that ingrained in a business. You're just not. So I just don't see each of the things it does altogether as being completely disruptible. I think that's one that people shouldn't have to worry about.

Host (Tyler Breaux or another main host) (8:03)

Yeah, I think we got some really good ideas here. And coming up after the break, we're going to talk about maybe some not great news as well. We're going to talk about job productivity and current job numbers after the break.

Tyler Breaux (8:14)

If you're serious about your trading, you know that the platform you use can be just as important as the strategies you execute. That's why I want to tell you about Tastytrade. Tastytrade is a powerhouse platform where you can trade stocks, options, futures, crypto and more all in one place. It's built for traders who want total control over their portfolio without being weighed down by high costs. They offer low commissions, including zero commission on stocks and crypto, so you actually keep more of what you earn. But it's not just about the price, it's about the tools. The platform is packed with advanced charting tools and backtesting to vet your ideas, a pre built strategy selector and risk analysis tools to help you trade smarter. And for advanced traders, there's active trader mode and one click trading for fast order entry. If you ever run into a snag, you can get live stellar support from their trade desk reps during trading hours. And if you're looking to level up your knowledge, tastytrade provides dozens of free educational courses right in your account. Whether you're an active trader, a long term investor, or planning for retirement, tastytrade has the account type to fit your goals. Visit tastytrade.com to start your trading journey. Tastytrade Inc. Is a registered broker, dealer and member of FINRA NFA nsipc.

Host (Tyler Breaux or another main host) (9:23)

Unfortunately, today is not the most positive news day for this podcast because we got some jobs numbers that were, to quote one of my favorite 1990s movies, Office Space. Not great, Bob. Job openings were the lowest since 2020 and announced layoffs were the highest since January of 2000. Well, January high layoff numbers were the highest since we saw in January of 2009. Now, I don't know about you, but I'm kind of struggling to put these numbers in perspective because thinking about the past five or six years of hiring and firing trends, we had some massive hiring rounds in 2021, 2022, just kind of as we were coming out of COVID And even though some companies admitted they may have overshot their needs for labor, they were hesitant to lay off because of various reasons. So I'm struggling with this concept. Is this just part of the natural ups and downs of the hiring cycle where we overshot early and now we're correcting? Is this related to AI productivity that we were just talking about? I'm really of many minds on this topic and I'd love to get your guys's input because I haven't come down on one side or the other.

John Quest (10:26)

I think yes and yes, Tyler. So you look at some of the places where jobs are pretty good. So healthcare looks like it's still generally adding some workers. Leisure and hospitality not doing bad. But where we are seeing decreases is right where you expect them to be, and that is entry level tech jobs. I think that AI does have something to do with that for sure, but I do think that some perspective is important here. So unemployment rates remain well within the historical average for the last 20 years. And so I don't want to make light of anyone losing their job and I don't want to just wave my hands at the significant spike in layoffs in January, but nothing yet screams to me that the economy is in trouble. It would take a few more months like January for me to really start to say, okay, there's a trend that we really need to pay attention to here.

Matt Frankel (11:16)

Yeah, I know that. I'm definitely, especially out of me and Tyler, I know I'm the glasses half full type of guy, but if we're going to see elevated layoffs here, it's more common in the first quarter, although this is still a pretty high number. Companies anticipate the needs for the busy holiday quarter. And then in the first quarter there's just that trend. Although the headline number of about 108,000 announced layoffs sounds like a lot. And it is. A lot of it is single company announcements, not just in AI. John correctly mentioned that a lot of this is entry level tech jobs, but UPS announced over 30,000 layoffs. That was included in that 108,000 number. Amazon announced 16,000, which is some of the entry level tech jobs. But a lot of it is single company too. That's Almost half of that big headline number. So not that the news isn't scary, but it is important to add context like this to it. Some of the job reductions seem to be natural, like companies focusing more on efficiency. Some definitely seems to be AI driven and not just because of AI fears, but because companies are ramping up spending in AI infrastructure and have to get the money to pay for it somewhere. But I do agree with John. One month's job status does not frighten me. But if this trend continues, that could change.

Host (Tyler Breaux or another main host) (12:34)

Yeah, to your point of the UPS numbers, I think that's also expected too because they have been trying to wind down their E Commerce delivery a little bit much to focus on small medium business, healthcare stuff, a little bit more value over volume so that one kind of comes in line with what UPS has been thinking about wanting to do. So guys, we're a podcast from the Motley fool and some of the core tenants of our investing philosophy here at the Motley fool is to buy companies over the long term and not let a short term thing or two kind of really lead to rash decisions. But you know, as investors and when we're making our decisions, what to you guys constitutes enough bad news to alter your thesis? You know, take these job numbers. What kind of trend in macro numbers would you need to see to either one drastically alter your current investment in something or when you have, you know, wanting to put new money into an investment?

John Quest (13:28)

Yeah, it's a good question, Tyler. I think it would have to be case by case as fools. I think that there's good reason to be perennially optimistic about the stock market in general. And so we are very almost 100% of the time, if not 100% we are looking for what can we invest in today? What's a good opportunity right now but individual stocks? I could flip to bearish on some economic data. It's possible. I try to build an investment thesis that takes into account that the economy does regularly go up, up and it does regularly contract. And so I want to build an investment thesis that looks through the economic cycles and isn't going to break just because the economy goes through its normal contractions or its normal slowdowns. But it is possible that I would build a thesis that is a little bit more dependent on the economy. I hate to single out a single company by name, but I think a company like Polaris, this is ticker symbol pii, they make four wheelers and stuff like that. Listen, it can struggle in a recession. This is a company that is dependent on product Sales really requires a strong consumer with plenty of discretionary income. There is a scenario where, you know, this net debt company could go through a prolonged economic downturn and really, really struggle. So. But there is a scenario where Polaris could be a very cheap stock. Maybe we're towards the bottom of the economic cycle and maybe I could make a case for investing in it at that time for the next three years or something like that as the economy heats up. But normally I would build an investment thesis that is not dependent on an economic cycle.

Matt Frankel (15:06)

I'll almost never stop investing entirely because of any type of macro concerns. I mean, even during the initial Covid crash when the sky was falling, Tyler and I lost hours of productivity, just kind of game planning what stocks we wanted to buy. But depending on the nature of the news, I can alter my investment focus and that's what we did back then. For example, if jobs data stays this bad for several more months, I might stop putting money into some of the cyclical areas like banking, where even though I like some of the businesses there a lot and focus on more evergreen industries like say insurance. Because no matter what the jobs market's doing, people still need to pay their car insurance and things like that. In a speculative sell off, I like to consider that's what I consider the current software sell off to be. I use it as a time to selectively look for opportunities, kind of like we discussed in the first segment. So I will start paying close attention to company earnings reports. I will say when macro data is bad just to take a little bit of an extra microscope and see where cracks are forming. But I don't stop investing.

Host (Tyler Breaux or another main host) (16:11)

Matt, I think you and I would be embarrassed to tell our wives how much we were looking at debt confidence of Tanger during the COVID breakdown. So yes, I can fully attest to some of the that Matt's talking about. And speaking of crazy stocks and looking at debt covenants, after the break, we're going to do stocks on our radar.

Tyler Breaux (16:28)

Support for the show comes from Fundrise. Investing in companies already in The S&P 500 can sometimes feel like you're being served someone else's leftovers. It's still a great meal, but it's hard not to imagine what the food tasted like when it was fresh out of the oven. But with venture capital by fundrise, you can finally get in early and take a seat at the table alongside the biggest names in tech investing. Fundrise's mission is to give investors the access required to invest in the best tech and AI companies before they go public. Visit fundrise.com fool to check out Fundrise's venture portfolio and start investing in minutes. All investments involve risk, including the potential loss of principle. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This is a paid advertisement.

Host (Tyler Breaux or another main host) (17:09)

Just a quick aside before we get to stocks on our radar here. We kind of joked last week when we were discussing Meta that it was like a Freaky Friday moment. Third quarter they were reported they were going to spend a ton of money. The stock dropped and then this quarter they said they're going to spend a ton of money and then the stock popped and we were kind of joking. It was the opposite of what happened at Alphabet in the third quarter. And guess what? This most recent quarter they announced today, they announced massive capital spending and I think the stock is down about 3 or 4% as we're recording today. So another Freaky Friday moment. Insert whatever investing trope that you have about Mr. Market or be greedy when it's fearful. There's a whole bunch. Pick your favorite one and add it right there. So for stocks on the radar, I'm going to go first today. And the one that I've been looking at is Powell Industries. Now I've been known to pick sleepy businesses from time to time and most of the time Powell Industries. I almost forgot the ticker powl that would fall into that basket of those sleepy businesses. Circuit breakers, switchbacks and other like electrical equipment for industrial or like municipal facilities, AI data centers, maybe LNG export terminals, you know the big stuff. But man was their most recent earnings anything but sleepy. Net new orders for the most recent quarter were up 63% compared to this time last year. Its book to bill ratio, which basically means the amount of orders that it brought in versus the amount that they sent out the door as completed equipment was 1.7 times, which means way more stuff's coming in than out the door. I wouldn't even call Powell Industries like a picks and shovels investment in AI infrastructure. This is like the blacksmith making the steel components of the picks and shovels to make them to sell them. Companies like Powell, and this is actually to John, I think it was your statement on kind of those bottlenecks in AI infrastructure, that physical stuff and needing to find those efficiencies. Companies like Powell are going to be where the pain points of AI build out are going to happen. These relatively smaller companies that are facing mass demand for things that are often a much more sleepy business, I think the companies that are able to meet that growing demand are going to do spectacularly well, in the coming years and certainly based on the quarterly numbers at Powell, there's an opportunity for them to make that happen. Matt, you go next.

Matt Frankel (19:36)

Yeah. So I'm going to kind of piggyback on what John mentioned earlier because I think cybersecurity is such a great call in the current environment. I'm going to go with zscaler though. Zs they provide secure access to all their enterprises, apps, their data. And in full disclosure, I use three different apps provided by the Motley fool today. And I logged in once. It was super easy. I got into all of them. The stock just hit a 52 week low. The surge in AI technology that we've been kind of talking about is going to increase the need for cybersecurity, not decrease it. And it's going to be a growing market for years to come. And I just can't say enough good things about how great of an opportunity I see in the cyber security right now.

John Quest (20:18)

And I'm going to go with GoDaddy ticker symbol G D Y. This business is not new. It's a company that allows you to buy a domain name, host a website and you know, implement some e commerce tools. There are aspects of this business that I do think would be replaceable with AI in theory, particularly the e commerce tools. But then there are other aspects of the business that really aren't. And so, for example, web hosting. GoDaddy provides its own web hosting with its own data centers. There's something physical here. It's not just software. And so that does give GoDaddy something defensible in my opinion. You look at the business growing by double digits. It's getting more profitable as it's embraced AI in its own workflows and now it trades at just nine times its forward earnings. That looks really just too cheap for me. It just repurchased 1.4 billion in of its own shares to the first three quarters of the year, which is good for more than 10% of its market cap right now. I think this business is important. It's profitable and the stock is darn cheap right now.

Host (Tyler Breaux or another main host) (21:23)

That gives us GoDaddy, Zscaler, Pal Industries and you know, we go back through the episode, I think there was a lot more companies that we mentioned along the way. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about and the Motley fool may have formal recommendations for or against. So don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our notes. Thanks to our producer, Dan Boyd and the rest of the Motley fool team for Matt, John and myself. Thanks for listening and we'll chat again soon.