John Quast (4:22)

I guess it goes to show what kind of personality I have because I kind of focused in a little bit on the one negative market commentary that I think we saw in all of the banking stuff. It was during the JP Morgan conference call, Jamie Dimon made some kind of, we could say comments on the state of private credit and lending to private credit. This comes on the heels of auto parts manufacturer First Brands Group and used auto dealer Tricolor both filing for bankruptcy. These are both private companies and those companies had loans with private creditors who also just had low. Those private creditors had loans with big banks. So Jamie Dimon kind of hinted that he thinks the private credit and other these non bank financial institutions, lenders to private equity and things like that. A lot of his commentary, you know, pointed to being a little bit of a weak point in the market. And I'm trying to sparse between, you know, his commentary being like, well we don't know how good these folks underwriting is. Which it's either, either like a, a commentary of the market or just diamond trying to talk up JP Morgan's book, which, you know, that's obviously his job a little bit. It certainly gives me something to follow up in the coming quarters as to whether or not it was, again, just Jamie Dimon talking it up or, you know, if there's actually really something here. So let me pass this back to you. What were the questions that you, you were left with on this most recent earnings call, and what do you want to follow up on?

Tyler Crowe (5:53)

Well, yeah, I would say that the investment banking commentary says that the economy is really in a healthy place, or at least it's on the right track. My question is, what changes that and how secure is that? You know, investing is a lot to do with risk management. And so, like, if I was to rewind the clock, go back to 2019, I just remember that economy feeling like a freight train in late 2019, and just asking what would possibly change that? Well, a once in a century pandemic. But this time it doesn't quite feel like a freight train to me. It does feel a little bit more fragile. And maybe that's reflected in some of the comments you just brought out from Jamie Dimon. It feels like we're just a social media post away from changing some investor sentiment dramatically. And so I'm just looking at this. I'm saying, okay, the numbers are saying that the economy is very healthy or at least going in the right direction. What would it take to change that?

Matt Frankel (6:47)

Look, I have mixed thoughts, just like Tyler does, mainly because the sharp declines in the loss reserves from both bank of America and Wells Fargo really seem to contradict Jamie Dimon's statement on credit quality. I agree, and I've been saying for a long time that the auto lending industry, especially the subprime market, could be a bit of a house of cards. It is far too easy to borrow, say, $50,000 to buy a depreciating asset right now. It's harder to get a mortgage, which is a safer form of a loan. But that doesn't mean that all private credit is necessarily set for a collapse. It could just be specific to the auto lending industry. It's definitely worth monitoring over the next few quarters. But over the past few years, I mean, since like 2022, when the bear market happened, pretty much every fear about deteriorating credit hasn't materialized as much as we thought it would.

John Quast (7:36)

Coming up, private assets want to be in your retirement, and it could really affect the way we invest.

WhatsApp Advertiser (7:45)

When did making plans get this complicated? It's time to streamline with WhatsApp, the secure messaging app that brings the whole group together. Use polls to settle dinner plans, send event invites and pin messages so no one forgets mom 60th and never miss a meme or milestone. All protected with end to end encryption. It's time for WhatsApp message privately with everyone.

John Quast (8:08)

Learn more@WhatsApp.com Admittedly, discussing first brands and tricolor's bankruptcy in the last segment isn't really exactly the best lead in for this next discussion. But you know, not every transition could be for perfect the the TR the drumbeat around private assets has become becoming more available to the investing public is getting louder and louder. More and more asset managers are exploring ways to package private assets either as private equity or private credit into taxed Advantage accounts like 401ks. Now I myself have a lot of conflicting thoughts about this. On the one hand, making private assets available to individuals gives us a lot more investing choices which but most of the time more choices is better. Conversely, I can see asset managers that own these assets or and trying to get them to individuals as a way of kind of just charging high fees for the privilege and access to private funds that they don't have anymore because low cost index funds and ETFs eroded a lot of fees that former mutual funds and asset managers used to enjoy. So I'm going to put it both to you because there's a lot of stories out there of companies like Blackstone and Blackrock. All of these companies are looking to find a new way to package private investments into 401ks or other types of retirement accounts. How do you see private assets fitting into your investment strategy?

Tyler Crowe (9:37)

Well, I mean personally I'm a big fan of fewer regulations from Uncle Sam. So on principle I like the idea of being able to add private assets to my retirement account. There are some companies that I would have loved to in recent years and one that comes to mind is Neuralink from Elon Musk. That's just a fascinating company to me and I would love to be able to invest in in my retirement account. I find it extremely interesting. You know, that said, as I look about this from a broad perspective, I mean opportunity without education is like giving a small child a box of matches. They can get hurt and they can break things. So I think there's a smart way to open this up and I think that there's a bad way to open this up. So hopefully we do it the smart way and not the way that creates a lot of problems, especially financially for people just getting involved in something that they don't really understand.

Matt Frankel (10:25)

Yeah. And Tyler, you're right that so far all of the deregulation around any type of private assets have allowed managers and investment platforms to charge high fees to investors. We've talked about this privately before, but there are funds out there that give investors exposure to private companies like SpaceX and OpenAI and charge, let's say ridiculous fees. But like you, I'm conflicted. It's both an opportunity and a threat to the retirement security of people in these 401k plans. And the statement from the executive order that the president signed allowing this is misleading that the standard products like S&P 500 index funds are not letting people achieve secure retirements. The S&P 500 has been a great wealth builder over the long term. The problem is that the average person doesn't save enough for retirement. It's not that they haven't had opportunities to build wealth. So I have conflicted feelings about this. Like John said, there is a right way and a wrong way to do it.

John Quast (11:27)

Yeah, there's been a lot of deregulation of access to things like this. I mean it started with the 2012 Jobs Act. It's something I can think of and I think ultimately, and this is, I get my concluding thoughts, I guess moves like this feel like an appeal to the inattentive investor. The ones that sign up for whatever plans you're companies 401k signs up for. And to that the good marketing of like private equity isn't subject to the whims of the market or something like that for long term investments. I mean you can see the marketing it writes itself. But you know, individual investors like us who put the time and effort into, you know, finding individual stocks to buy and hold over the long term. You know, I don't know if we'll see as many benefits from this because we want to do our due diligence and that's, you know, we'll see how this shakes out. But I think that's where I'm going to end up landing unless somebody really blows me away with a really interesting offer in private capital. And after that, we'll do stocks on our radar.

Indeed Advertiser (12:23)

This episode is brought to you by. Indeed, when your computer breaks, you don't wait for it to magically start working again. You fix the problem. So why wait to hire the people your company desperately needs? Use indeed sponsored jobs to hire top talent fast. And even better, you only pay for results. There's no need to wait. Speed up your hiring with a $75 sponsored job credit@ Indeed.com podcast. Terms and conditions apply.

John Quast (12:52)

Guys, unfortunately, none of us were the recipients of that $300 trillion stablecoin fat finger that happened at PayPal either yesterday or today. So I think we're just gonna have to keep on building wealth the old fashioned way with some buy and hold stocks. So with that in mind, what's actually on your radar this week? And John, we're gonna start with you.

Tyler Crowe (13:11)

Yeah. So on my radar this week is company called TripAdvisor symbol T, R I P. And you know, at Hidden Gems, we value misunderstood companies. Something that has something that the market's not appreciating. And TripAdvisor certainly has that. In my opinion. It's not just the TripAdvisor brand that you get here, you also get another brand which is called Viator. Now, I want to just talk about Viator because I believe that the real value here, and this goes along with our discussion regarding investment banking, I think that TripAdvisor has something more valuable in Viator than what TripAdvisor is itself. And spinning it out or ipoing it in some way may unlock that value. So you just look at Viator for by itself for a moment. It's generated 882 million in trailing twelve month revenue. It's growing at 11% which is double digits high gross margin. It is profitable as a standalone. On a standalone basis, you look at something like Airbnb, a price to sales ratio of seven. Let's give Viator half that valuation. At three and a half times sales, Viator would have a $3 billion market cap on a standalone basis. And you look at TripAdvisor. Right now it has a $1.8 billion market cap. So potentially more value in Viator as a standalone business than what it is right now under TripAdvisor. I think this is kind of an underappreciated thing and why it's on my radar.

Matt Frankel (14:33)

Yes, I'm going to talk about one of my longtime favorite real estate companies to follow, Empire State Realty Trust esrt. They own the Empire State Building and a portfolio of about two dozen other primarily office buildings in Manhattan. Not only is the stock about 35% below its 52 week high, despite pretty strong performance from its business and the observatory on the Empire State Building, but I'm seeing signs that the New York City office market could be stronger than most experts think. Just consider the competitor. SL Green just agreed to buy a 36 story office tower right near Park Avenue for $730 million. It's a big bet that the New York City office market will strengthen in the years to come. And if that valuation is, if it turns out they're paying the right price, the Empire State Building alone could be worth more than the current market cap of the company. Forget the other two dozen properties. So talk about a hidden gem. I think if the New York City office market does what SL Green thinks it's going to do, that Empire State could be a bargain.

John Quast (15:33)

On the deregulatory thing, there's been another story about the Trump administration looking to privatize its portfolio of student loans, which I don't know if it's going to happen or not, but it gives me a pretty lame excuse to talk about SLM Corp. Ticker is SLM this. People might also know it as Sallie Mae, which is basically the bank similar to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, but it's focused on student loans. It is actually a publicly traded company. One of the things that makes it so appealing to me is if you actually look at the credit quality that it has, you think of student loans, they tend to be a relatively secure sort of loan in the sense of like paybacks. Our default rates are relatively low. They actually can't even be discharged in bankruptcy. They also get things like high rates of co signed with parents and things like that. And a lot of what they actually have on their books is for masters in business or pre med or law or something like that. So it tends to have very high amounts with also good credit quality for future payments. And it's just a business to me that looks incredibly well. If you look at things like net interest spreads, which is the difference between on the interest rate on the loans and how much its depositors get, it's quite high compared to most other banks. So you get a secure payment at a high net interest rate. This is a business right now that's trading for about 11 or 12 times earnings and I think people are worried about credit quality, but I think that might be a little overblown for a business that if we talk about hidden, it really is quite hidden out there in a very quality business for something. Matt John, that's all the time we have for today. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stock they talk about, and the Motley fool may have formal recommendations for or against. So don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. Thanks again to our producer, Dan Boy for keeping us on schedule for Matt, John and myself. Thanks for listening and we'll chat again.