Rocket Lab Shakes Up Satellite Communications

Summary

---

Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing

Episode: Rocket Lab Shakes Up Satellite Communications
Date: June 29, 2026
Host: John Quass
Guests: Matt Frankel, Rachel Warren

---

Episode Overview

This episode focuses on major shakeups and transactions in both traditional media and the space industry. The team begins with a detailed analysis of Comcast’s spinoff of NBCUniversal and its potential industry ramifications, then pivots to dissect Rocket Lab’s blockbuster acquisition of satellite company Iridium. The episode wraps up with robust advice for listeners on the perennial question: When and how should investors sell stocks?

---

1. Comcast’s Breakup and NBCUniversal Spinoff

00:02 – 06:29

Key Discussion Points

• Comcast’s Corporate Breakup

  • Comcast announces it will spin off NBCUniversal after already spinning off Versant Media Group (CNBC, Golf, Rotten Tomatoes, etc.).
  • Pre-announcement, Comcast’s stock was down ~30% over the past year; after the announcement, stock surged up to 20% pre-market, settling at +10%. This reflects a ~$10–15 billion increase in market cap. (A: 00:40)

• What’s in the NBCUniversal Spinoff?

  • Assets include NBC network, Telemundo, Peacock streaming, Universal film/TV studios, Universal theme parks, Sky European business.
  • Remaining Comcast will focus strictly on broadband and wireless, with 65 million subscribers. (B: 01:22)
  • The so-called “conglomerate discount” had previously weighed down the stock.

• Investor and Market Sentiment

  • The market appears to value “pure play” entities more highly, possibly due to their simplicity as acquisition targets.
  • Speculation: NBCUniversal could spark a bidding war similar to the one that followed Warner Bros Discovery’s split. Potential acquirers named include Amazon and Apple. (B: 02:02)

• Spinoff Structure and Implications

  • The spinoff is tax-free; Comcast shareholders receive NBCUniversal shares without immediate tax consequences.
  • Comcast will retain a 19.9% stake in NBCUniversal for at least a year, monetizing it gradually. (C: 02:44)
  • The new structure allows Comcast to focus cash flow on share buybacks, dividends, and debt reduction.

Notable Quotes

• On market reaction:
  "One announcement here sending the stock up 20% pre market, up about 10% now. So the market is giving it roughly 10 to $15 billion more in market cap just for announcing this move. And that is an absolutely massive swing."
  — John Quass (A: 00:40)

• On strategic rationale:
  "The new company will include all the entertainment and broadcasting assets...So the remaining Comcast will really just be the broadband and wireless services, which is a pretty big business."
  — Matt Frankel (B: 01:22)

• On acquisition speculation:
  “For a company like Amazon, it would make a lot of sense... They’d be getting the rights to things like NBC’s Olympic coverage, NFL Sunday Night Football...could be a nice smart addition to compete with other big streaming providers.”
  — Matt Frankel (B: 03:53)

---

2. Rocket Lab’s $8 Billion Acquisition of Iridium

07:55 – 13:24

Key Discussion Points

• The Acquisition Announcement

  • Rocket Lab is acquiring satellite communications company Iridium for $8 billion — a large, surprising move seen as an aggressive play to counter SpaceX. (A: 07:55)
  • Iridium is positioned as a global satellite network focused on safety-critical services (not direct broadband like Starlink).

• Strategic Rationale

  • “A launcher can no longer survive strictly on the low margins of launching rocket ships for third parties.” (C: 08:42)
  • By acquiring Iridium’s operational satellite constellation, L-band spectrum rights, and large and stable subscriber base, Rocket Lab accelerates its transformation to a vertically integrated, end-to-end satellite service provider.

• Competitive Landscape

  • Starlink and Iridium serve very different markets: Starlink focuses on high-bandwidth internet; Iridium specializes in narrowband, reliable connectivity (e.g., satellite phones, IoT, critical communications).
  • Opportunity for Rocket Lab to be an industrial/military-focused counterweight to SpaceX’s consumer-centric dominance.

• Financials and Execution Risks

  • $8 billion price is about nine times Iridium’s sales, and sixteen times EBITDA— considered "high" by the hosts.
  • Rocket Lab’s net losses last year were $180 million; acquiring profitable Iridium (with ~$495 million EBITDA and 57% margins) could provide needed financial stability. (B: 10:22, C: 12:29)
  • Funding is backed by a $3.6 billion bridge loan from Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo; deal is cash-and-stock at $54/share.

Notable Quotes

• On industry positioning:
  “...To become a true peer to the likes of SpaceX, a company needs to own and operate the really lucrative satellite networks those rockets carry into orbit.”
  — Rachel Warren (C: 08:42)

• On profitability and value:
  “They're buying a few things here... It's a network really importantly that would take years to build and billions of dollars... they’re also buying profitability.”
  — Matt Frankel (B: 10:22)

• On the rich price paid:
  “A 9x top line multiple is high. ...But I will say Iridium, they have got 57% operational EBITA margins, very predictable recurring cash flows that have been for a long time anchored by resilient government contracts.”
  — Rachel Warren (C: 12:29)

---

3. Mailbag: When and How to Sell Stocks

16:06 – 22:03

Key Discussion Points

• Listener Question:
  How should investors decide which stocks to sell to fund new ideas, or which to sell in retirement for income?

• Matt’s Framework

  • Two distinct situations: (1) selling for new opportunities, (2) selling in retirement for living expenses.
  • Key questions before selling:
    1. Would you buy this stock at today’s price if you didn’t already own it?
    2. Do you want to keep building the position in the future?
  • Focus on top conviction holdings; lower conviction or over-allocated positions may be trimmed.
  • For retirement: Build a 2-3 year cash buffer before drawing down stocks. Prefer selling lower-volatility, dividend-oriented holdings for income, maintaining high-growth stocks for longer-term performance. (B: 17:59)

• Rachel’s Perspective

  • Occasionally trimming oversized winners (15–20%+ of portfolio) to manage concentration risk and fund new investments.
  • Reassess original investment thesis—if a stock’s management, moat, or growth prospects erode, it’s a candidate for trimming or selling, even if still generally liked. (C: 20:27)

Notable Quotes

• Matt on Sell Decisions:
  “Would I buy the stock today at the current price if I didn’t already own it? And number two, do I see myself continuing to build out this position in the future? Those are the two questions I ask to kind of determine my conviction level in all the stocks I own.”
  (B: 17:59)

• Rachel on Portfolio Balance:
  “If I think that a company has grown so much that say now it makes up 15 to 20% of my total portfolio composition, in my view, that really exposes one to massive single stock risk.”
  (C: 20:27)

---

Memorable Moments & Tone

• Playful speculation regarding who might buy NBCUniversal, including quips about Disney's theme park monopoly (“They might as well just buy Orlando if that was the case.”) (B: 03:53)
• Clear-eyed skepticism about Rocket Lab’s acquisition premium, balanced by optimism about the strategic fit and recurring revenues.
• Strong emphasis on Foolish investing principles: long-term thinking, portfolio rebalancing, and conviction-based investing.

---

Suggested Timestamps for Key Segments

• 00:40 – Comcast breakup announcement and market reaction
• 02:44 – Financial structure and tax details of NBCUniversal spinoff
• 03:53 – Who could acquire NBCUniversal? (Amazon, Apple, Disney discussion)
• 07:55 – Rocket Lab buys Iridium: What’s at stake?
• 12:29 – Pricing and financial analysis of the Rocket Lab/Iridium deal
• 17:59 – How to decide which stocks to sell (listener mailbag advice)
• 20:27 – Diversification and managing risk through trimming positions

---

Conclusion

This episode dives deep into seismic shifts in both the media and space industries, unpacking why investors and acquirers are rethinking the value of “pure play” businesses. In both Comcast’s and Rocket Lab’s cases, the underlying lesson is that strategic focus and willingness to refocus or expand a company’s core business can trigger significant value creation—or destruction. The final mailbag segment grounds listeners with time-tested evaluation frameworks for keeping their own portfolios healthy and aligned with long-term goals.

---

Transcript

[A]

Breakups, buyouts and selling stocks. All this and more on today's Motley Fool HIDDEN GEMS Investing. Welcome to Motley Fool HIDDEN Gems Investing. I'm John Quass and I'm joined today by foolish contributors Matt Frankel and Rachel Warren. Today we're talking about a shakeup in outer space as well as taking a listener question about selling stocks. But first we gotta talk about Comcast because it's breaking up now. In January, it already spun off its TV channels and some Internet properties, cnbc, Golf, Rotten Tomatoes. It spun those off into Versant Media Group, ticker symbol vsnt. But now Comcast is coming back here for round two, announcing it will spin off NBC Universal, which contains a lot more than just, you know, the channel NBC. Now as I zoom out here, KongPass stock down about 30% over the past year prior to this announcement. And one announcement here sending the stock up 20% pre market, up about 10% now. So the market is giving it roughly 10 to $15 billion more in market cap just for announcing this move. And that is an absolutely massive swing. Were investors really punishing this stock so much because it was a conglomerate?

[B]

Well, yes. The new company will include all the entertainment and broadcasting assets, including the NBC network, as you mentioned. That's still part of it. Telemundo, the Peacock service. It also includes the Universal film and TV studios, the Universal theme parks and the Sky European business. So the remaining Comcast will really just be the broadband and wireless services, which is a pretty big business. It has 65 million subscribers. So there are a few reasons why investors might be cheering the news. As you correctly said, the stock was down about 30% over the past year going into this and with the so called conglomerate discount hurting it, but not for the reasons that you might think. So NBCUniversal could be a lot more valuable as an entertainment content play, especially when it comes to being an acquisition target. And that's really the environment we're in right now. So remember when Warner Brothers Discovery planned to spin off its cable TV and studios business, announced that and then it became like the trigger for a bidding war between Netflix, Paramount, which eventually got it, and a few others. Today's surge represents investors pricing in a similar outcome here it remains to be seen if it actually happens. But this could really be the next big consolidation play for the industry. I mean, Amazon and Apple are two examples of companies that could be interested just to name a couple speculative names off the top of my head, but there are definitely others.

[C]

Yeah, I mean, the primary driver of any shareholder value Moving forward is the creation of two pure play entities that can be valued independently on their own merits. Right. I mean, the remaining Comcast could potentially transform into a leaner, more profitable telecom giant focused on broadband infrastructure and wireless connectivity. That's sort of the bullish thesis there. And obviously, you know, without the financial drag of funding expensive streaming content. And then you could see how this new Comcast could redirect, you know, free cash flow directly towards share buybacks, dividend hikes, paying down corporate debt. I'll note this is a tax free spinoff. So current Comcast shareholders will receive shares of the new NBCUniversal company without triggering an immediate tax liability. Comcast, for their part, they're keeping a 19.9% massive stake in the new media company and they intend to monetize that over the first year. So still a notable presence where that's concerned.

[A]

Matt, I want to circle back to you here because it does sound like you're saying that a bigger player might want to acquire NBCUniversal once it is spun out. And you mentioned Amazon and Apple specifically. Are you being serious here or are you just daydreaming?

[B]

Well, I think that's fair to say. There are a lot of these content providers who are leaning into live content. They would love to expand the intellectual property in their streaming services and so on and so on. Now, there are some companies that would be unable to acquire NBCUniversal, most likely like Disney is an example. There's a lot of complimentary parts of the business, but they would run into a theme park monopoly problem. I think they might as well just buy Orlando if that was the case. You know, but for a company like Amazon, it would make a lot of sense. Like think of what they would be getting. They'd be getting the rights to things like NBC's Olympic coverage, NFL Sunday Night Football. They're clearly pushing into live content. And the fact that they already own the MGM studios, it could be a nice smart addition to compete with other big streaming providers. Apple has been lagging in the content wars and has the cash to acquire something like this rather than focusing too much of their attention on building it from scratch.

[A]

So Matt's kind of giving us a bull case here wherein NBCUniversal is worth more on the public auction block than it was inside of Comcast. But let's say that Amazon never does make a bid and this company here, NBC Universal, just has to stand alone and compete. Does this company actually have what it takes to survive the streaming wars independently, or is it going to Shake up the industry in some way.

[C]

Rachel, I don't see this as a player that shakes up the industry on its own. You know, if you look at it on a standalone operational basis, NBCUniversal faces the same brutal headwinds as any traditional media giant, you know, from cord cutting to the expensive streaming wars. But Wall Street's not really bidding the stock up because they NBCUniversal to suddenly grow its way out of the media crisis. I think the excitement is the idea that this newly independent NBC Universal could be an incredibly attractive acquisition asset overnight. You know, you think about how by stripping away Comcast's massive broadband infrastructure, the Roberts family has essentially turned an unbiable telecom giant into a neatly packaged, comprehensive acquisition target. I think that that's where the mindset is. I mean, cash rich tech giants, larger media platforms that want a world class theatrical engine like Universal Pictures, other iconic IP global theme parks and so on, they could bid directly on this media powerhouse without having to run, you know, the legacy telecom side. So we will see, right? These are all sort of predictions that we're making. But I would not be surprised if there are quite a few tech giants or media platforms that are looking at the landscape with a great deal of curiosity and, and acquisitive interest than there were a few days ago.

[A]

So it looks like NBC Universal is either going to need to learn to compete on its own, or it may be an attractive takeover target. Either way, we'll be watching. But speaking of attractive takeover targets, we've got a big one to talk about in the space race. After the break, you're listening to Motley Fool. Hidden Gems. Investing.

[D]

Support for the show comes from Fundrise. Investing in companies already in The S&P 500 can sometimes feel like you're being served someone else's leftovers. It's still a great meal, but it's hard not to imagine what the food tasted like when it was fresh out of the oven. Historically, only venture capital investors were served access to the best tech companies in the world that had not gone public yet. And that meant the rest of the world simply had to sit on their hands and wait for an ipo. Fundrise says they're completely upending that dynamic with its new venture capital product. With just a $10 minimum investment, Fundrise's mission is to give every everyone the access required to invest in the best tech and AI companies before they go public. There's nothing wrong with leftovers, but now if you want with fundrise, you can take a seat at the table alongside the Biggest names in tech investing. Visit fundrise.com fool to check out Fundrise's venture portfolio and start investing in minutes. All investments involve risk, including the potential loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This is a paid advertisement.

[A]

Welcome back to Motley Fool. Hidden Gems Investing. So let's move here from the spinoffs to acquisitions. And Rocket Lab announcing this morning it's acquiring iridium for $8 billion. This was a surprising move for me this morning. Iridium is a satellite communications company not unlike Starlink from SpaceX. And I think that investors tend to view Rocket Lab as kind of SpaceX's little brother. The company is prone to doing big acquisitions, but this is a different level of big acquisition. This is not baby brother level acquisition at $8 billion. Does this move signal something more aggressive to become a true Pepsi to SpaceX's Coke? Rachel?

[C]

Well, you know, in the modern space economy, a launcher can no longer survive strictly on the low margins of launching rocket ships for third parties, Right? So to become a true peer to the likes of SpaceX, you, a company needs to own and operate the really lucrative satellite networks those rockets carry into orbit. So by taking control of Iridium's active low earth orbit fleet, its globally coordinated L band spectrum, a very robust base of active subscribers, Rocket Lab could bypass years of capital drag and this can transform that business from more of a launch utility into an end to end global satellite service entity. I think that that is probably the vision that that management has. It could also give Rocket Lab highly profitable recurring subscription cash flow it needs to fuel that long term growth. This is a very capital intensive business and as well to aggressively fund its upcoming medium lift neutron rocket. Now moving forward, maybe there's this idea that Rocket Lab could achieve complete vertical integration by deploying and replenishing Iridium's future constellations using its own launch systems. And that way they could capture those manufacturing and launch margins. Internally. SpaceX's Starlink focuses on high bandwidth direct to consumer broadband Internet. Iridium corners the gold standard of safety critical global voice data and Internet of things applications. So not necessarily fighting head to head for, you know, residential Internet users. But I think Rocket Lab is trying to really gain a foothold in those industrial, maritime and defense infrastructure applications. And this can help it very much establish a resilient counter counterweight to SpaceX's orbital monopoly.

[A]

So Matt, what is Rocket Lab exactly getting here?

[B]

Yeah, so they're buying a few things here and Rachel mentioned some of these. So they have a network of 66 satellites in operation right now, about two and a half million subscribers between them. And it's a network really importantly that would cost years to build and billions of dollars. And it's really the time commitment that Rocket Lab doesn't need. There's kind of a race to get there when it comes to controlling the space economy. And waiting 10 years to build out a satellite network is not an attractive thing. So the deal, they're also getting 9 megahertz of spectrum, which is kind of a narrower bandwidth than SpaceX has for Starlink. Starlink is broadband and this is narrowband, but it is a very important asset. And they're also buying profitability. Rachel mentioned that Iridium is a profitable business, but that's really important here because Rocket Lab, I think their net loss was about $180 million last year. This gets them $100 million of profitability back. So it kind of creates a better path to profitability. But I don't really see this as Rocket Lab trying to become the next SpaceX. Maybe I have an unpopular opinion on that. Iridium's network, it's more about reliable connectivity as opposed to broadband speeds. Think satellite phones, the safety type things, things that you have to have say if you're in the middle of nowhere. It's not a market that SpaceX is really targeting. There's some competition here, like the direct to cell connectivity that they're trying to, that Starlink and Rocket Lab are both, or Iridium are both trying to build out that essentially use the satellites as a fallback for when you don't have cell service. But that's not the primary focus of what Iridium does. And I see this as kind of being a different sort of business, but competing in the global bandwidth spectrum, I guess.

[A]

Well, I can't help but think that maybe Rocket Lab is overpaying here because at an $8 billion price tag, I mean you look, that's about nine times sales for Iridium. And Iridium's growing at just a single digit rate. So I don't know, it just seems like a high price to pay. Rachel?

[C]

Yeah, a 9x top line multiple is high. I won't argue with you there. It also translates this deal to a roughly 16x EBITDA multiple based on their $495 million in EBITDA. But I will say Iridium, they have got 57% operational EBITA margins, very predictable recurring cash flows that have been for a long time anchored by resilient government contracts. And so this does provide Rocket Lab with something of a financial cushion. To fund that ongoing development of the neutron rocket without constantly diluting shareholders as well as hoping hopefully minimizing some of the capital drag as they're building out their low Earth orbit network. I'll also note Rocket Lab secured a $3.6 billion bridge loan commitments from Deutsche bank and Wells Fargo to back this $54 a share cash and stock deal. So that's a little bit of added context for the parameters of this acquisition.

[A]

Well, regardless of the price tag, I think that all of us agree that this is a massive move for Rocket Lab. We'll find out within a year or two whether it was visionary or reckless. But after the break, we're going to dip into the mailbag. You're listening to Motley Fool. Hidden Gems Investing.

[D]

Summer always changes how I get dressed. I want pieces that feel lighter and more breathable. Things that are easy but still put together. That's why I keep coming back to Quint. They focus on high quality essentials that feel and look amazing. Think breathable linen and soft organic cotton. Well made basics, but without the luxury markup. It's that rare balance where everything feels elevated but still effortless. Quint's European linen pants and shirts are perfect warm weather upgrades to add to your rotation, starting at just $34. Their tees are soft and easy to wear and their lightweight cotton sweaters are perfect for cooler summer nights. Everything at Quint's is priced 50 to 80% less than similar brands. They work directly with ethical factories and cut out the middle mint, so you're paying for quality, not brand markup. Quint goes way beyond clothing. Custom upholstered sofas, ceramic cookware, premium bedding. It's the kind of brand you'll end up recommending to everyone for everything. As the summer is heating up. I'm really loving my Flowknit Breeze performance tees and my Pro Tech golf pants. My son is a huge fan of the kids. Organic cotton ankle socks elevate your summer wardrobe. Go to quints.com motley for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E.com motley for free shipping and 365 day returns. Quints.com motley they say leadership isn't just about where you're going. It's about the conviction it takes to get there. For those who demand the world and possess the drive to claim it, there's a vehicle of equal distinction. Dynamic by design and engineered for pure impact the Range Rover Sport rises to meet you the moment you take the lead. This is the most advanced Range Rover Sport yet, a masterclass in uncompromised performance and unbridled agility. Inside, the innovation is seamless. You'll find an elegant 13.1-inch touchscreen that puts total control of the vehicle's systems right at your fingertips. But it's the refinement that sets it apart. Sculpted 22 way heated seating with built in massage function ensures every journey is defined by peerless comfort, whether it's through unique interior finishes or custom wheel options. The ways to personalize your Range Rover Sport are nearly unlimited, command attention and experience ultimate luxury in motion. Exclusive offers are available now. Explore further@range rover.com welcome back to Motley

[A]

Fool Hidden Gems Investing one quick note. We want to make you a part of the conversation. So if you have a stock or investing question for Matt, Rachel, or myself, anyone on the show really, you can email [e-mail] and we'll take that question if it is a good one, if it is short, and if it is foolish. So send those in to podcastool.com podcastool.com and we are indeed taking a question from the mailbag here today. The question reads like this. I've been following foolish investment principles for about eight years. My only regret is that I didn't find Motley fool sooner. I am fully invested and like all my stocks. Here is the question how do I pick which investments to sell in order to invest in new foolish recommended stocks? And when I retire in a few years, how do I pick stocks to sell for income? Not signed D Money. I like that name. I wanted to point out here before I throw this question to Matt and Rachel, I wanted to point out one of the things I love about the Motley fool investment philosophy is that it encourages investing with investing new money regularly into the stock market. I know that that's not always a luxury that listeners have or investors have, but one of the benefits of that, especially in this context where D Money says I like all my stocks, sometimes that's the case. Sometimes you're invested in things that you do like and you don't want to sell, but there are other things you'd like to buy as well. So that's kind of the beauty of investing new money regularly. If that's an option, I don't have to make that choice between do I sell this one or keep this one? I'm just continuing to invest new money for new ideas. But that caveat out of the way with the Motley fool investment philosophy. Not advice, but just general philosophy that we're giving there. I'm going to throw this to Matt first. Matt, what do you think about this question from D Money?

[B]

Yeah, so there's two separate parts there, right? So there's how do I free up capital to buy new stocks that I'm interested in and how do I free up capital when I'm retired? I'm not going to buy other stocks, but I just need the money to live on. So two different questions there. The first one is a difficult question, mainly because the listener has done a lot right. I mean, being fully invested in a portfolio of stocks that you truly believe in is like the ongoing goal of long term investing. So there are a few ways you can think about it. So even though you like all your stocks, ask yourself the question about each one of these. Well, two questions. So number one, would I buy the stock today at the current price if I didn't already own it? And number two, do I see myself continuing to build out this position in the future? Those are the two questions I ask to kind of determine my conviction level in all the stocks I own. And from there you can make a list of, say, your 10 highest conviction stocks. Those are kind of off the table to sell, but you can also identify your lower conviction positions which can become sell candidates, either in full or partially when you want to act on a particular recommendation. There are certainly other things to consider there, such as the tax consequences if you're selling a stock that you own that has gone up in value a lot. But as far as selling stocks for income in retirement, here's my general framework. And this is coming from someone who's probably two decades away from retirement. But I'm a certified financial planner and I've dealt with this with clients before. So first, aim to get to retirement with two to three years of expenses in either cash or similar assets like money market funds, high yield savings accounts, short term treasuries, things to that effect. That eliminates the need to sell any stocks immediately if you don't want to, which can be. That could be worth its weight in gold if you retire and then the market crashes, you don't have to sell your stocks into a bad market. Then you have two buckets from your portfolio. You have your more conservative stocks. These are like dividend stocks, like your compounders, like Berkshire Hathaway is one I would put in this basket. Those make the best choices to gradually tap into for cash when needed. There are stocks that are generally lower Volatility, you don't have to really worry about the long term holding period. Then you can use that other bucket of stocks which are your long term growth holdings for your that targeted 5 plus year hold which is really a cornerstone of foolish investing. So that's how I think of, you know, gradually drawing down your portfolio in retirement. But just my opinion, I mean well,

[C]

to our listener, a huge congratulations on, on building a portfolio of businesses that you love. We've talked about this. You know, ideally we're, we're buying fresh recommendations for a portfolio with, with new cash so that we can leave our winners compounding uninterrupted. But this isn't always realistic, right. Sometimes our investing capital is maxed out or obviously if you're trans transitioning into retirement, you have to work with the portfolio you have. I'll talk a little bit about what my mindset has been as someone that is still a bit far off for retirement, so to speak, but very much is constantly evaluating my portfolio and looking at ways to grow my winners and to trim those that I don't want to keep in my portfolio anymore. So for me, looking at my biggest winners, if I think that a company has grown so much that say now it makes up 15 to 20% of my total portfolio composition, in my view, that really exposes one to massive single stock risk. So sometimes shaving off just a tiny sliver of that outsized position can be a good way to fund new diversified business. That can be a really healthy way to manage your risk without abandoning the company and the position entirely. And I think as well, when I'm looking at whether I want to trim a position in my portfolio, I also evaluate the underlying reasons that I bought the stock. Right. Is the management team still executing? Is the competitive moat what it was or has it degraded? You know, if a business has perhaps stalled, if some of those growth tailwinds have turned into headwinds, that for me is usually a clear candidate to trim, even if I still really like the business. And that can also yield some, some fresh capital that I can put back into the market and into growing my portfolio.

[A]

Yeah, I couldn't agree more with that. To know when to sell, you first have to know why you bought and then evaluate off of that. But thank you to Matt and Rachel. That's all the time we have for today. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about and the Motley fool may have formal recommendations for or against. So don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. Thanks to our producer, Dan Boyd and the rest of the Motley fool team for Matt, Rachel and myself. Thank you so much for listening to our show today, and we'll see you again in the next episode.