Transcript
A (0:02)
Hello everyone. Welcome to the Julius Bear Podcast. This is Richard Tang, the China strategist and Head of Research Hong Kong for Van Julius Bear. It's great to have Hong Hao with us again to discuss the outlook of the Chinese market. Hao is a renowned economist and he's also the Managing Partner and CIO of Lotus Asset Management. Hi Hao, thank you very much for your time speaking with us again.
B (0:27)
Hey Richard, great to be here.
A (0:28)
How the question I got the most in recent days is simply why China market underperformed, even though when you look at the us, Japan, Korea and Taiwan, these indexes have all done very well. Now of course the Chinese market did not drop year to date. The CSI 300 index still gave a positive return of 5% and the Hang Seng index has gained 4%. But when you compare those to South Korea at 75% year to date gains, Japan 25, Taiwan 45, that's still very significant underperformance. Now I suspect one reason may be the sectoral or thematic composition in the market because right now the AI rally is very much concentrated on the infrastructure stocks, for example, the semiconductors, the memory, the optical communication, etc. And these stocks carry heavy weights in the stock indices in Japan, Korea and Taiwan. But they are not as important as in the main board Chinese indexes such as CSI 300 or the Hang Seng Index, and in particular the Internet stocks have heavy weights in the Hong Kong market. So arguably those stocks drag down the overall index performance. But beyond this reason on the market composition, what may be the other reasons that the Hong Kong Chinese markets underperform? And more importantly, when can we really, really expect a better momentum from them?
B (1:54)
Yeah, well, I believe these indices that have been closely followed by foreign investors have been measuring the wrong part of the Chinese economy because most of the components of this index are all economy stocks. So they tend to be larger, have much bigger market cap and trading volume. But then at the same time, they represent an old traditional part of the Chinese economy. While the new Chinese economy are concentrated on AI, semiconductors, robotic companies, biotech companies as well, many of these companies are generating phenomenal earnings growth and showing significant earnings growth potential as well. And yet they are being underrepresented in this traditional indices that is being followed by global investors. And so as such, if we look at these indices, you know, we're measuring the traditional part of the Chinese economy and therefore we get a false image of how well the Chinese economy and the Chinese market is performing. Right? So you know, many of these companies, they're having a paradigm shift from zero to one, you know, from loss making companies transforming into profit making companies and they are experiencing exponential profit growth. So if you look at many of the new companies that got listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange this year and since last year they all did very well post IPO. Many of them have registered multiple hundred percent of gains on the second day of 5 billion, continue to do well after IPO. So I think if you look at an index of this newly listed companies that is representing the newer part of the Chinese economy, then you will find a comparable or even better market performance relative to the US peers. Of course you know the South Korean market has gone crazy because much of the performance is being generated by the semiconductor names such as Samsung and Hynix and all that. We have never seen this kind of stock market performance as well. So to say that the Chinese tech companies are doing exceedingly well is not to brush off the phenomenal performance that is being generated by the Korean economy and also the Korean semiconductor names.
