Murder Sheet Podcast Summary
Episode: The Delphi Murders: Richard Allen on Trial: Day Twelve: The Phone Calls
Release Date: November 1, 2024
Hosts: Áine Cain and Kevin Greenlee
Podcast: Murder Sheet
Introduction
In this gripping twelfth episode of the Murder Sheet podcast, hosts Áine Cain and Kevin Greenlee delve deep into the intricacies of Day Twelve of Richard Allen's trial for the Delphi murders. The episode primarily focuses on the controversial phone calls made by Allen during his incarceration, shedding light on the prosecution's efforts to use these calls as pivotal evidence against him.
Housekeeping and Acknowledgments
Before diving into the trial's proceedings, Áine and Kevin extend their gratitude to Michelle Jensen, a valued member of the Murder Sheet community who recently assisted them. Kevin humorously remarks, “[04:33] Kevin Greenlee: I think we might hear her name being thanked again sooner rather than later,” highlighting the supportive network behind the podcast.
Overview of the Trial Proceedings
Kevin sets the stage by emphasizing the significance of the current days in the trial, stating, “[02:07] Kevin Greenlee: I will…”
Judge Gull notes procedural matters, allowing the prosecution to present crucial evidence. The central focus is on Richard Allen's numerous phone calls, which the prosecution believes contain incriminating statements.
Richard Allen’s Phone Calls: Content and Implications
The prosecution introduces Master Trooper Brian Harshman, who has meticulously monitored Allen’s phone communications. “[19:56] Anya Kane: Yeah, he called himself the phone guy,” Áine explains, highlighting Harshman’s role in tracking over 700 calls made by Allen.
First Phone Call (November 14, 2022):
In a somber conversation with his wife, Kathy, Allen's tone fluctuates between despair and calmness. Áine notes, “[24:31] Anya Kane: He sounded very upset, but suddenly took on a very flat, more calm, affecting demeanor.”
Second Phone Call (April 2, 2023):
Allen discusses his newfound interest in religion, mentioning, “[27:22] Kevin Greenlee: ...accepted the Lord Jesus as my savior,” signaling a shift in his demeanor.
Third Phone Call (April 3, 2023):
A pivotal moment arises when Allen confesses directly to his wife, stating, “[31:56] Kevin Greenlee: I want to apologize to you. I did it. You know, I did it.”
Subsequent Calls:
Áine and Kevin analyze the consistency and tone of Allen’s confessions, noting a lack of emotional distress that one might expect. Áine observes, “[14:34] Anya Kane: ...it really wasn't what I was expecting.”
Prosecution’s Argument and Harshman’s Testimony
Harshman presents detailed accounts of the phone calls, emphasizing Allen's calm and subdued demeanor despite the gravity of his statements. “[59:20] Anya Kane: Yeah. These conversations just sounded like normal conversations.”
He also introduces a significant detail from Dr. Walla’s report, wherein Allen recounts the events leading to the murders, including the crucial mention of a van—a detail only the perpetrator would know.
Defense’s Cross-Examination and Challenges
Defense attorney Rosie challenges the credibility of the van detail by introducing Brad Weber as a possible suspect. “[68:08] Anya Kane: Yes. And he sounds similar to Bridge Guy,” Áine points out the unsettling similarity between Allen’s voice in the calls and the "Bridge Guy" chatter heard earlier in the trial.
Rosie attempts to question Harshman on the prevalence of tips regarding the van, but Harshman remains steadfast, admitting, “[68:25] Kevin Greenlee: I don't know.”
Technical Difficulties and Defense's Strategy
A significant disruption occurs when the prosecution faces technical issues while presenting a critical phone call dated May 17, 2023. “[85:22] Kevin Greenlee: ...this video is 30 minutes long. It's not, not clear if the defense has seen it.”
The defense appears increasingly disorganized, with attorney Andrew Baldwin expressing uncertainty about reintroducing Odinism into their defense strategy, despite it being previously dismissed. Áine comments, “[113:00] Anya Kane: Odinism was thrown out over the summer.”
Introduction of Defense Witnesses
The defense calls their first witness, Cheyenne Mill, who provides an alibi that seemingly exonerates Allen. However, her testimony lacks impactful observations, leading Áine to critique, “[90:05] Anya Kane: ...it didn't feel like this witness really had much to add.”
A second defense witness, Teresa Lieberet, presents an unconvincing account, struggling to recall specific details, which further weakens the defense's position. Áine notes, “[105:55] Anya Kane: ...she couldn't do it. And that didn't really lend a lot of confidence in her as a witness.”
Prosecution's Rebuttal and Closing of the Case
The prosecution wraps up their case by highlighting the consistency and reliability of Allen’s confessions. Amid mounting pressure, the defense fails to present compelling evidence or witnesses, leaving the prosecution's stance seemingly unchallenged.
Conclusion and Shift to Defense’s Strategy
With the prosecution completing their case, the episode hints at a potential shift as the defense prepares to present their side. Áine and Kevin express skepticism about the defense's preparedness, “[113:00] Anya Kane: Odinism is not a good theory...”
The episode ends on a tense note, anticipating the defense's next moves and the ongoing battle for the jury's perception of Richard Allen's guilt or innocence.
Notable Quotes
- Kevin Greenlee: “[04:12] Kevin Greenlee: She was really delightful. I enjoyed talking with her.”
- Anya Kane: “[14:11] Anya Kane: Not like ranting, not raving. Just like having almost a normal conversation.”
- Kevin Greenlee: “[56:36] Anya Kane: No, not at all. And in, in addition to that, ...”
Key Takeaways
- Phone Calls as Evidence: The prosecution heavily relies on Richard Allen's phone calls as evidence, portraying them as calm confessions without signs of duress.
- Defense Challenges: The defense attempts to introduce doubt through witness testimonies that lack strong corroborative details and residual technical issues.
- Trial Dynamics: The episode highlights the strategic maneuvering within the courtroom, showcasing the tension between prosecution’s structured narrative and defense’s fragmented approach.
- Jury's Perception: With the prosecution's strong presentation and the defense's faltering start, the jury remains at a critical juncture in assessing Allen's culpability.
This episode offers an in-depth analysis of the unfolding trial, providing listeners with a comprehensive understanding of the legal strategies, witness credibility, and the emotional undercurrents influencing the case's trajectory.