Murder With My Husband: Episode 266. The Delivery Man Killings

Host: OH NO MEDIA
Release Date: April 28, 2025
Title: The Delivery Man Killings

Introduction

In Episode 266 of "Murder With My Husband," hosts Peyton and Garrett Moreland delve into a chilling true crime case that spans across two states, intertwining the lives of legal professionals and revealing the dark motivations of a disturbed individual. This episode captures the harrowing details of the murders of Mark Angelucci and Daniel Andurle, both targeted by the same perpetrator under the guise of a FedEx delivery man.

The First Murder: Mark Angelucci’s Tragic End

The episode opens with Peyton setting the stage for the first incident:

"Imagine hearing a knock on your front door one day. You see a delivery person in a FedEx uniform. It's a complete stranger just dropping off a package... But when you open the door, your entire life changes forever just because that stranger was out looking for revenge."
[06:06] - Peyton Moreland

Mark Angelucci, a 52-year-old men's rights attorney from Crestline, California, dedicated his life to advocating for men’s rights, notably representing men who were victims of domestic violence. On July 11, 2020, while enjoying a quiet Saturday at home, Mark was brutally murdered by a FedEx delivery man who unexpectedly pulled a handgun and shot him at point-blank range.

"The delivery man then ran back to his white car, got in, and sped off."
[10:19] - Peyton Moreland

Mark's death left the community and his colleagues in shock, as there were no immediate suspects, despite his involvement in high-profile legal cases.

The Second Murder: Daniel Andurle’s Fatal Encounter

Just eight days later, on July 19, 2020, a similar tragedy unfolded in North Brunswick, New Jersey. Daniel Andurle, a 20-year-old law student and the only child of Esther Salas, a prominent judge, became the second victim. Daniel was shot by the same type of FedEx delivery man while opening the door for a package, resulting in his immediate death.

"His dad, Mark, suffered severe wounds to the stomach, but thankfully, he did make a full recovery."
[19:43] - Peyton Moreland

Connecting the Crimes: Investigation Unfolds

The investigation took a crucial turn when authorities discovered a link between the two murders. In New York State, a 72-year-old attorney named Roy Den Hollander was found dead in the Catskill Mountains, with evidence tying him to the previous murders.

"So shortly after making this discovery, police also test the ballistics in the weapon that they found with Hollander at his crime scene. Sure enough, the bullets are a match."
[26:43] - Peyton Moreland

The ballistic evidence confirmed that Hollander was the common perpetrator behind both killings, revealing a pattern of targeting legal professionals.

Profile of the Killer: Roy Den Hollander

Roy Den Hollander emerged as a complex antagonist with a deep-seated vendetta against the legal system, particularly targeting men’s rights advocates and feminist figures. His background painted a picture of a once-promising attorney whose career and personal life were marred by misogyny and obsession.

"Roy Den Hollander had a huge anger problem. He was a controlling, misogynistic, sexist, delusional, and disturbed individual."
[32:07] - Peyton Moreland

Hollander’s motivations were rooted in his defeatist view of society’s treatment of men, compounded by personal setbacks, including a failed marriage and a terminal cancer diagnosis.

Murderer's Motives: A Life Driven by Vendetta

Hollander's manifesto, discovered posthumously, revealed his intense hatred towards women and his belief that men were systematically oppressed. His legal battles against women's studies programs and Ladies' Nights at bars highlighted his antagonistic stance.

"The only problem with a life lived too long under feminazi rule is that a man ends up with so many enemies that he can't even the score with all of them."
[36:31] - Peyton Moreland

His terminal illness appeared to catalyze his decision to execute his final acts of revenge, targeting those he deemed responsible or obstructive to his ideology.

Conclusion and Aftermath

The Daniel Judicial Protection Project was established in the wake of these tragic events to safeguard public officials from similar attacks. Judge Esther Salas advocated for legislation to protect the personal information of public figures, aiming to prevent strangers from accessing their homes.

"Daniel's law was signed into effect. This bill is aimed at protecting public officials from having any of their personal information listed online."
[40:58] - Peyton Moreland

The episode concludes with a reflection on the senseless loss of innocent lives and the enduring impact on the victims' families and the legal community.

"It's just sad. The son had nothing to do with it. The husband had nothing to do with it."
[41:10] - Garrett Moreland

Notable Quotes

• Peyton Moreland [06:06]: "Imagine hearing a knock on your front door one day... But when you open the door, your entire life changes forever."

• Garrett Moreland [10:43]: "Oh, my gosh."

• Peyton Moreland [19:18]: "His dad, Mark, suffers severe wounds to the stomach, but thankfully, he did make a full recovery."

• Peyton Moreland [35:06]: "He's not a good guy, people around him, no offense."

Key Takeaways

• Antagonistic Legal Battles: Roy Den Hollander targeted legal professionals who represented or advocated for men's rights and feminist causes, indicating a motive rooted in ideological opposition.

• Investigation Complexity: The dispersed nature of the crimes across different states complicated the investigation, requiring FBI involvement to connect the dots.

• Legislative Impact: The murders prompted legislative action to protect the personal information of public officials, aiming to prevent future attacks.

• Psychological Profile: Hollander's actions were driven by a combination of personal grievances, ideological extremism, and terminal illness, showcasing the dangers of unchecked hatred and obsession.

"Murder With My Husband" Episode 266 provides a gripping exploration of a calculated vendetta executed by a man who felt marginalized and wronged by the very legal system he once served. The hosts adeptly navigate the complexities of the case, offering listeners a comprehensive understanding of the events and their broader implications.