Podcast Title: My Momma Told Me
Hosts: Langston Kerman and David Bore
Guest: Garrick Bernard
Episode: The Mandela Effect Got Us!
Release Date: March 18, 2025

Introduction to the Episode

In this episode of My Momma Told Me, hosts Langston Kerman and David Bore delve into the intriguing phenomenon known as the Mandela Effect, accompanied by their guest, Garrick Bernard. The trio explores various instances where collective memories diverge from documented reality, sparking discussions about possible explanations ranging from parallel universes to orchestrated gaslighting.

Understanding the Mandela Effect

The conversation kicks off around the [20:07] mark when Garrick Bernard introduces the Mandela Effect, explaining it as a situation where many people remember events or details differently from how they occurred. He states:

"The Mandela Effect, basically, is everybody having a different memory of... it's like two different parallel universes kind of colliding."
— Garrick Bernard [20:07]

Langston Kerman initially confuses the term, mistaking it for "Mandala Effect," but acknowledges the correct association with Nelson Mandela:

"I always thought it was the Mandala Effect. And I was just Remembering the name of the effect. Wrong."
— Langston Kerman [20:31]

Common Examples of the Mandela Effect

The hosts and guest explore several popular examples that illustrate the Mandela Effect:

1. Berenstain vs. Berenstein Bears:

   • Garrick mentions the discrepancy in the spelling of the beloved children's book series.
   • Langston adds confusion between "Berenstain" and "Berenstein," questioning the memory shift.

2. Jiffy vs. Jif Peanut Butter:

   • David Bore recalls "Jiffy" with a 'Y,' while it's officially spelled "Jif."
   • Langston remembers a berry-infused version labeled "Jiffy."

3. Sinbad as a Genie:

   • Garrick and David discuss the collective memory of Sinbad starring as a genie in the 1990s film Kazaam, which never existed.
   • Langston humorously associates Sinbad with other fantastical roles, enhancing the surreal nature of the conspiracy.

4. Mr. Rogers’ Famous Line:

   • The hosts debate the iconic phrase "It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood," with variations in wording causing confusion.

5. Monopoly Man’s Monocle:

   • David claims that the Monopoly Man has a monocle, while in reality, he does not.
   • Garrick references Ace Ventura where a character resembling the Monopoly Man is portrayed with a monocle, fueling the misconception.

Theoretical Explanations: Parallel Universes vs. Gaslighting

The discussion shifts towards potential explanations for these widespread memory discrepancies:

• Parallel Universes Collision:

  • Garrick suggests that overlapping memories from parallel dimensions could be causing these shifts.

  • David elaborates on this theory by proposing that a collision event might have merged aspects of different universes, leading to conflicting memories.

    "I'm picturing him in my head. That's so in the genie."
    — David Bore [22:35]

• Orchestrated Gaslighting:

  • Langston and David entertain the possibility that authoritative entities are intentionally altering collective memories to manipulate perceptions.

  • Garrick agrees, highlighting how these changes are subtle enough to foster trust in conspiracy theories without inciting widespread panic.

    "They look at me in the same way... like, no. The Fruit of the Loom logo had a cornucopia behind it. And I'm like, it fucking never did."
    — Garrick Bernard [26:38]

Cultural and Racial Implications

The hosts touch upon the racial undertones of conspiracy theories, discussing how misinformation often targets specific communities:

• Impact on Black Communities:

  • Langston questions why conspiracy theories predominantly affect minorities, particularly Black individuals, suggesting it might be a form of systemic sabotage.

    "What is the next step? Let's make them think that Nelson Mandela died in prison. He did not die in prison."
    — Garrick Bernard [58:06]

• Media Representation and Memory:

  • They explore how media portrayals can distort collective memories, leading to widespread misconceptions.

Humorous Interludes and Personal Anecdotes

Throughout the episode, Langston, David, and Garrick interject humor and personal stories to keep the conversation lively:

• Lavar Ball Anecdotes:

  • They discuss Lavar Ball's public persona and business ventures, blending humor with conspiracy theories about his influence and health.

    "I have a hard time with it. And then you watch all that shit on just like, the amount of waste and stuff like that."
    — Langston Kerman [06:04]

• Funny Contradictions:

  • The trio engages in playful banter about personal appearances and hypothetical scenarios, adding levity to the complex topic.

    "Nobody wants that. They do, once, and that's really all you need."
    — Garrick Bernard [33:57]

Concluding Thoughts

As the episode progresses, the hosts reflect on the implications of the Mandela Effect and its broader impact on society:

• Skepticism and Belief:

  • Langston expresses skepticism, seeking more concrete evidence to support the theories discussed.

  • David remains open to possibilities, highlighting the allure of deciphering hidden truths behind everyday anomalies.

    "I think this is the door we open."
    — Langston Kerman [17:08]

• Call to Action:

  • The hosts encourage listeners to consider these phenomena critically, balancing curiosity with skepticism.

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Garrick Bernard [20:07]:

  "The Mandela Effect is like two different parallel universes kind of colliding."

• Langston Kerman [20:31]:

  "I always thought it was the Mandala Effect. Wrong."

• Garrick Bernard [26:38]:

  "The Fruit of the Loom logo had a cornucopia behind it. And it fucking never did."

• David Bore [22:35]:

  "I'm picturing him in my head. That's so in the genie."

• Langston Kerman [17:08]:

  "Maybe this is the door we open."

Conclusion

The Mandela Effect Got Us! offers an engaging exploration of how collective memories can diverge from reality, blending humor with thought-provoking theories. Through lively debates and personal anecdotes, Langston Kerman, David Bore, and Garrick Bernard invite listeners to ponder the nature of memory, reality, and the forces that shape our perceptions.

For those intrigued by the intersections of memory, conspiracy, and cultural influence, this episode provides both entertainment and food for thought.