wavePod

Nancy Neiman, "Markets, Community and Just Infrastructures" (Routledge, 2020) - New Books Network | Wave AI Podcast Notes

Back to New Books Network

Nancy Neiman, "Markets, Community and Just Infrastructures" (Routledge, 2020)

New Books Network

Sat Nov 01 2025

Summary

Podcast Summary

Episode Overview

Podcast: New Books Network
Host: Marshall Po
Guest: Nancy Neiman, Professor at Scripps College
Episode Title: Markets, Community and Just Infrastructures (Routledge, 2020)
Date: November 1, 2025

Theme:
This episode features a deep discussion with Nancy Neiman about her book, which critiques mainstream economic thinking and explores how markets, communities, and "just infrastructures" intersect. The conversation challenges the universal assumptions of neoclassical economics, scrutinizing the foundational beliefs about rationality, justice, and the role of community in economic outcomes. Neiman shares both theoretical insights and concrete case studies to illuminate how infrastructures — ideational, political, and cultural — underpin whether markets produce just or unjust outcomes.

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Nancy Neiman's Background and Motivation ([02:00]–[07:18])

Nancy has been teaching at Scripps College for over 30 years; initially trained in economics but switched to political science due to disillusionment with neoclassical orthodoxy.
The book was written primarily for her students, aiming to provide them with a language and framework to critique the dominant "econ-bro" narrative that equates market rationality with justice and efficiency.
Quote ([07:11]):
“I’m trying to, in this book, give folks a language to understand... I do ‘econ-speak’ pretty well... I make an argument for the rational justice.” — Nancy Neiman

2. What is Political Economy? ([09:05]–[13:17])

Political economy differs from traditional economics and political science; it focuses on the intersection of wealth (economy) and power (politics).
Neiman references both historical perspectives (Smith, Marx) and the dominance of rational choice theory in political science.
She expresses admiration for Robert Heilbroner’s The Worldly Philosophers, a book that introduced generations to the narrative of economic thought without relying on mathematical abstractions.

3. Critique of Economic Binaries and Market Fundamentalism ([14:02]–[20:21])

The conversation critiques the binary split between capitalists/socialists, globalization/anti-globalization, and how these oppositions limit genuine debate about the market’s role in society.
Neiman uses food systems as an example (e.g., “vote with your fork”) to illustrate how both right- and left-wing approaches can be inadequate, the former overemphasizing consumer choice and the latter sometimes stigmatizing any discussion of incentives or markets as inherently unjust.
Markets are never universal — their outcomes depend on the infrastructures in which they operate.

4. Exploring Markets: Definitions and Misconceptions ([21:09]–[24:37])

Markets are not monolithic; the commonly used phrase “the market” is an abstraction. In reality, markets exist in many forms — from farmer’s markets to high-tech auctions.
Nancy and Marshall discuss the conceptual distinctions between reciprocity, exchange, and markets, referencing Karl Polanyi’s work.
Quote ([23:32]):
“This is Carl Polanyi, right?... I actually want to dismantle some of the walls, the ways in which we define markets as different from those other forms of social exchange.” — Nancy Neiman

5. Justice and Market Outcomes ([24:37]–[33:43])

Neiman intentionally does not strictly define “just outcomes,” siding instead with widely recognizable injustices such as climate destruction, mass incarceration, labor exploitation, and structural racism.
Income inequality is offered as a paradigmatic example of justice-related debates, with reference to Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century.
Behavioral economics is discussed as both confirming and failing to change neoclassical assumptions about individual rationality.

6. Infrastructures: The Conditions Underlying Market Outcomes ([34:02]–[44:41])

Nancy’s primary thesis is that market outcomes (just or unjust) are deeply conditioned by infrastructures: communal attitudes, cultural practices, and ideological beliefs.
She provides a case study from Uganda ([36:07]) of an interfaith women’s knitting cooperative that, despite the potential for personal profit incentives, opts for community-driven sharing, emphasizing solidarity over rivalry.
- Memorable Exchange ([40:58]):
  - Nancy: “How do you incentivize people to knit more?”
  - Rebecca (cooperative member): “The minute we start... it would destroy our community. The whole point of this enterprise is to support our community... it is completely rational not to have that incentive mechanism.”
Neiman critiques the reduction of community values to mere additions in an individual “utility function,” highlighting that collective identities aren’t just individual preferences writ large but radically different frameworks.

7. Comparative Systems: The USSR, Cuba, and China ([44:54]–[55:21])

The USSR imposed narrow wage ranges aiming for egalitarianism, but “black markets” appeared almost immediately — a lesson in how command economies fail to meet diverse needs.
Neiman contrasts this with Cuba, where state values precondition market entry but do not eliminate markets. Cuban socialism’s survival and flexibility are attributed to underlying communal infrastructures and values, not mere state-imposed control.
China, while nominally communist, exemplifies “hyper-capitalism” with long-term societal breakdowns, showing that political structure alone doesn’t ensure just outcomes.

8. Small Scale vs. Large Scale: Questions of Scalability ([61:04]–[64:56])

Is justice in markets only achievable at small scales (like families or local co-ops)?
Neiman acknowledges that her case studies tend to be small and context-specific, but she highlights Mondragon in Spain as a scalable cooperative system with shared infrastructures (financial institutions, healthcare, etc.).
During the last global recession, Mondragon’s various co-ops collectively weathered economic downturns by prioritizing community well-being over narrow profit maximization.

9. The Limits and Realities of “Free Markets” and Government Intervention ([64:56]–[68:11])

The U.S. is not a pure “free market” system; state interventions — sometimes in favor of exploitation (e.g., temporary visas for agricultural workers) — structure the market.
Neiman ties this to the idea of “racial capitalism,” noting the racialized dimensions of labor exploitation (e.g., Mexican day laborers in the U.S.).

10. Neiman’s Current Research ([68:29]–[71:01])

She is investigating global food sovereignty networks and nomadic herders (Maldari) in India.
Her new work focuses on how marginalized, mobile populations (“the canary in the coal mine”) experience and resist the enclosure of the commons, connecting infrastructural justice to environmental sustainability.

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

On the purpose of the book ([07:11]):
“I wrote it for my students... the problem is that not only do we not, I think, have the tools to fix it, I don't think we have a language to combat the dominant narratives about markets that perpetuate those injustices.” — Nancy Neiman
On community and rationality ([40:58]):
“The minute we start [paying by output], yes, people might knit more... but in the end, it would destroy our community.” — Rebecca, Ugandan cooperative member (recounted by Neiman)
On economic assumptions ([43:55]):
“We are not inherently... our identities are so inter-meshed, if we're healthy, with our identity as part of a community... it really does not make sense to start from the assumption of individual rationality.” — Nancy Neiman
On scale and solidarity ([64:25]):
All co-ops in Mondragon voted to “take pay cuts in order to make room to bring in workers from these unemployed industries... as a community, they weathered the storm extremely well.”

Timestamps for Important Segments

Neiman’s background & book motivation: [02:00]–[07:18]
What is political economy? [09:05]–[13:17]
Problems of binaries in economics: [14:02]–[20:21]
What is a market? [21:09]–[24:37]
Just outcomes & justice in economics: [24:37]–[33:43]
Community infrastructures case study (Uganda): [36:06]–[44:41]
Cuba, China, USSR: comparative cases: [47:53]–[55:21]
Mondragon and scalability: [61:24]–[64:56]
U.S. labor market interventions: [64:56]–[68:11]
Current research: Nomadic herders in India: [68:29]–[71:01]

Summary Table

| Segment | Timestamps | Main Points | |--------------------------|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Neiman’s Background/Book Motivation | 02:00–07:18 | Roots in econ/polisci, critique of neoclassical orthodoxy, wrote book for students | | Political Economy Defined | 09:05–13:17 | Rejects disciplinary boundaries; wealth & power intersection; narrative over equation | | Binaries & Market Fundamentalism | 14:02–20:21 | Right/left market debates; critique of “vote with your fork”; presence of community ideologies | | Meaning of Markets | 21:09–24:37 | Markets as abstraction; spectrum from reciprocity to barter to markets | | Justice & Outcomes | 24:37–33:43 | Structural injustices; income inequality; Piketty; behavioral econ limits | | Infrastructures & Community | 34:02–44:41 | Infrastructural conditions shape market outcomes (Uganda co-op case study) | | Comparative Systems | 47:53–55:21 | Soviet Union, Cuba, China—roles of state, market, and community | | Scale & Cooperation | 61:24–64:56 | Questions of scalability; Mondragon cooperative model as example | | U.S. Labor Market Realities | 64:56–68:11 | State intervention and exploitation; racial capitalism insights | | Neiman's New Research | 68:29–71:01 | Food sovereignty, commons in India, climate as justice issue |

Final Thoughts

Nancy Neiman’s work critiques the myth of market universality and rational self-interest, arguing that markets are not inherently just or unjust but are shaped by underlying infrastructures—social, political, and ideological. Her mixture of theoretical critique and hands-on case studies (Uganda, Cuba, Mondragon) provides both a language and a framework for thinking about justice in economics in richer, more context-specific ways.

"I'm trying to flip the narrative... when there is a strong commitment to community... those infrastructures actually lead to market changes that don't destroy the education system, the health care system.” — Nancy Neiman ([54:22])

Loading summary...

Transcript

A (0:00)

Hello, everybody. This is Marshall Po. I'm the founder and editor of the New Books Network. And if you're listening to this, you know that the NBN is the largest academic podcast network in the world. We reach a worldwide audience of 2 million people. You may have a podcast or you may be thinking about starting a podcast. As you probably know, there are challenges basically of two kinds. One is technical. There are things you have to know in order to get your podcast produced and distributed. And the second is, and this is the biggest problem, you need to get an audience. Building an audience in podcasting is the hardest thing to do today. With this in mind, we at the NBM have started a service called NBN Productions. What we do is help you create a podcast, produce your podcast, distribute your podcast, and we host your podcast. Most importantly, what we do is we distribute your podcast to the NBN audience. We've done this many times with many academic podcasts, and we would like to help you. If you would be interested in talking to us about how we can help you with your podcast, please contact us. Just go to the front page of the New Books Network and you will see a link to NBN Productions. Click that, fill out the form, and we can talk. Welcome to the New Books Network. Hello, everybody, and welcome to the New Books Network. I'm Marshall Po, the editor of the network, and today I'm very pleased to say we have Nancy Nyman on the show. I've known Nancy since Nancy 1986. 87.

B (1:23)

86.

A (1:24)

86, I think that's right. Yeah. We met in sunny California, and Nancy is a professor at Scripps College, also in sunny California, which is very nice. Yes. And we're going to be talking about her terrific book markets, community and just infrastructures. And it's from Rootledge and the Root Frontiers and Political Economy series, and it came out in 2020. I encourage you to go read it. Obviously, Nancy will tell you all about it and that will entice you to go read it. So thank you for being on the show, Nancy.

B (1:59)

Of course. Thank you for having me.

A (2:00)

My pleasure. So, to begin, tell us about yourself.

B (2:06)

Let's see, we met playing pickup basketball.

A (2:13)

We did. That's true.

B (2:15)

Yeah. I have been teaching at Scripps College for over 30 years, which is hard to believe. I originally went to graduate school to do a PhD in economics and became disillusioned pretty quickly, so I left after a year and switched into the political science program. And that's kind of important for the sort of trajectory of my career and and the background of this book. Right. Because a lot of the critiques I have of neoclassical economics come from a bit of an insider's view. So I think that's important. Yeah.

B (4:31)

Ah, well, in the preface of the book, I say, I did it for my students, but I'm gonna. I'm gonna give you a little bit sort of broader explanation. I think we live in a broken world. I think this book is timely in the sense that climate catastrophe, mass incarceration, labor exploitation, racism, you name it, the list goes on. And I feel like the system that we have is failing us. And the problem is that not only do we not, I think, have the tools to fix it, I don't think we have a language to combat the dominant narratives about markets that perpetuate those injustices. Right. And so, like my. When I say I wrote it for my students, and I'll give you a grounded example here, my students are often, you know, in my political economy class learning about this stuff, and they're simultaneously taking econ classes. And, you know, there's a. There's a college across the street that is known to be quite conservative, and with a very large econ, thou shall go unnamed. I'll go unnamed. And my students will often say. And they. They call them econ Bros. But they will, they will get into arguments with the econ bros. And you know, the, the arguments that those folks trot out tend to be these universalistic, highly theoretical, you know, supply and demand and individual incentives. And you just don't understand how markets work. And you know, in some ways, you know, I really think it's, it's easy to argue from that perspective because you simply have to trot out these, these theories that are based on assumptions that are totally unrealistic, but the assumptions go unnamed. Right. And so, you know, from my students perspective, when they want to push back on this idea of market rationality and you know, individuals just following their own, you know, incentives, utility maximization, they have to come up with very specific examples and explain things in a way that is difficult. Right. And so I think this whole book is focused around something that I call the rationality of justice, which is.

B (15:57)

Right. And, you know, markets in some ways. And market incentives are what got us into, right. The extreme pursuit of profit. The, the power that large corporations have over public policy have gotten us into this problem. So the notion that just like consumers going out and buying the right things. Right. Is going to get us out of the problem is, is kind of messed up. But, but from the left, it's also problematic that there's this like, inherent avoidance of anything that smacks of markets or of rationality or incentives, right. Say you use the word incentives and you know, in lefty circles and it's really, it can be problematic. So I, I had this incredible interview in New York City with a woman who was actually hired in the mayor's office to oversee a change in the food system and to like, really, like, try to coordinate and bring together all these incredible community gardens and farmers markets and things that were going, right. And so, like, good for New York, good for actually investing in. They actually created a position. And you know, and she had come from the world of community organizing and she was telling me how difficult it is for her when she goes out to like, so there's a ton of money coming in to invest in these kinds of, you know, community gardens. That kind of thing is, is, is hot right now. And so these huge corporations are like, doing these grants and things. And the question is, who's getting the grants? Right. She wants the communities who have been investing in these neighborhood projects and these like, amazing things to, to get that money, but instead the money is going to people who are doing this high tech greenhouse stuff, like Elon Musk's brother. Really? Yes. And in places like Brooklyn and calling it like social justice, racial justice stuff, right? But here's the thing. She's, she, she's trying to get the community organizers who are doing the work to, you know, she's like, look, you need to learn how to write a grant. You need to figure, you know, there are things that you need to put in here. People should be paid for their work, right? And they balked at that. Right. That, this idea that, that sounds like a market, right? So I guess what I'm trying to say. And you know, clearly she believed this as well, even though she had my book. I really think that we need to stop thinking about markets as universalistic. Right. I think that markets and exchange are going to be with us and have been with us forever, and they're not necessarily prone inherently to just or unjust outcomes. But instead, and this is the infrastructures part, I'm trying to argue rather than the universalistic, that markets are embedded in these infrastructures. And when I say infrastructures, I don't necessarily mean roads and, you know, technology and all that. I mean ideological, cultural, political infrastructures that actually incentivize people within markets to do things that either end up promoting justice or exacerbating injustice.