New Thinking Allowed Audio Podcast: Consciousness and Neuroscience with Alex Gomez Marin

Release Date: February 17, 2024

Introduction

In this compelling episode of the New Thinking Allowed Audio Podcast, host Jeffrey Mishlove engages in a profound conversation with Dr. Alex Gomez Marin, a physicist and neuroscientist from the Institute of Neuroscience in Alicante, Spain. Dr. Marin is not only renowned for his scientific contributions but also for his personal experiences with near-death phenomena and his leadership at the Peri Center in Italy—a hub dedicated to the exploration of human consciousness.

1. Dr. Alex Gomez Marin’s Background and Near-Death Experience

Dr. Marin begins by recounting a profound near-death experience (NDE) that significantly altered his perspective on life and consciousness.

• NDE Description and Impact:
  [02:15] Alex Gomez Marin shares, “I was in a tunnel... there were three figures, three people waiting for me... guides or avatars... offering help to get out of the well. I politely declined... I wasn’t particularly concerned at first, but later realized its significance.”

• Subsequent Changes in Life:
  [06:10] Marin reflects on how this experience coincided with significant career milestones, including his tenure in Spain and his invitation to direct the Peri Center in Italy. He attributes his subsequent personal growth and new opportunities to the transformative nature of his NDE, describing it metaphorically as being “sprinkled with golden dust.”

2. The State of Neuroscience and Consciousness Studies

The conversation delves into the prevailing paradigms within neuroscience, particularly the dominance of materialism and the marginalization of consciousness studies.

• Neuroscience’s Materialist Bias:
  [13:04] Mishlove observes, “Mainstream neuroscientists seem to behave as if none of that research [on consciousness, NDEs] exists,” highlighting the field’s reluctance to embrace non-materialistic interpretations.

• Marin on Scientific Tradition:
  [14:35] Marin provides a historical overview, tracing Western science’s 400-year journey since Galileo. He critiques the initial exclusion of the subjective world from scientific inquiry, a stance that has persisted despite the multifaceted nature of consciousness.

3. Historical Context: Galileo and the Objective-Subjective Split

Dr. Marin contextualizes the current scientific discourse by revisiting Galileo’s influence on the separation between the objective and subjective realms.

• Galileo’s Division:
  [24:52] Mishlove connects Galileo’s era to the modern split, noting the Council of Trent’s role in relegating the subjective mind to religious domains.

• Marin’s Metaphorical Divorce:
  [36:27] Marin likens Galileo’s split to a “divorce,” where science took over the objective world while subjective experiences remained under the church’s purview. He argues this division has led to the current challenges in integrating consciousness studies within mainstream science.

4. Current Debates: Materialism vs. Alternative Views in Neuroscience

The episode explores the tension between materialistic neuroscience and alternative theories that acknowledge consciousness as a fundamental aspect of reality.

• Marin on Heterodox Science:
  [09:50] Marin describes his journey from orthodox physics to a more eclectic and heterodox scientific approach, embracing theories that transcend materialism. He emphasizes the importance of phenomenology and the intrinsic perspective in studying consciousness.

• Mishlove’s Observation on Dualists:
  [20:12] Mishlove mentions prominent dualist neuroscientists like Sir John Eccles and Wilder Penfield, noting their significant yet overlooked contributions to the field.

• Marin’s Critique of Promissory Materialism:
  [21:24] Marin criticizes the stubborn adherence to materialism, coining the term “promissory materialism” to describe the expectation that future advancements will resolve consciousness’s mysteries without considering alternative paradigms.

5. The Controversy Over Integrated Information Theory (IIT)

A significant portion of the discussion centers on the recent backlash against Giulio Tononi’s Integrated Information Theory, deemed pseudoscientific by a group of over 100 neuroscientists.

• Mishlove Introduces the Issue:
  [28:08] Mishlove references Dr. Marin’s recent article criticizing a letter by prominent neuroscientists who labeled IIT as pseudoscience, highlighting the field’s resistance to non-materialistic theories.

• Marin’s Analysis of the Critique:
  [28:54] Marin dissects the letter, appreciating its multi-layered arguments while expressing concern over its collective dismissal of IIT. He draws parallels to Paul Feyerabend’s critique of scientific dogmatism, emphasizing the need for pluralism in scientific inquiry.

• IIT’s Phenomenological Foundation:
  [35:55] Marin defends IIT by underscoring its foundation in phenomenology—building a theory from the ground up based on conscious experience, rather than purely objective measurements.

6. Philosophy of Science and the Evolution of Consciousness Studies

The dialogue navigates the philosophical underpinnings of scientific study, advocating for a more inclusive approach to understanding consciousness.

• Beyond Dualism and Materialism:
  [24:52] Marin suggests expanding the philosophical framework beyond the traditional dualism-materialism dichotomy, incorporating views like panpsychism and idealism to enrich scientific exploration.

• Marin’s Triangle of Experience, Expert, and Experiment:
  [36:27] Marin introduces a metaphorical triangle comprising personal experiences, expert interpretations, and experimental validations. He argues for a harmonious integration of these elements to advance consciousness studies, rather than subordinating subjective experiences to objective expertise.

7. Artificial Intelligence and Theories of Consciousness

The conversation shifts towards the burgeoning field of artificial intelligence and its implications for theories of consciousness.

• AI’s Imitation Game:
  [43:52] Marin compares AI, particularly sophisticated chatbots, to mirrors rather than entities possessing genuine consciousness. He contends that our tendency to project human-like consciousness onto these technologies reflects more about human perceptions than the machines themselves.

• Virtual Reality vs. AI:
  [46:44] Marin expresses a greater interest in virtual reality, where the experiencer remains central, unlike AI, which risks overshadowing human consciousness with artificial constructs.

• Consciousness Requires More Than Physicality:
  [48:39] Marin argues that consciousness cannot be reduced merely to physical interactions. He emphasizes the need for embodiment—emotions, flesh, and subjective experiences—as essential components of genuine consciousness, which AI lacks.

8. Concluding Insights and Future Directions

As the episode draws to a close, both participants reflect on the necessity for openness and paradigm shifts in scientific inquiry.

• Marin’s Call for Paradigm Shifts:
  [50:55] Marin urges the scientific community to embrace a broader array of philosophical perspectives to fully understand consciousness. He advocates for moving beyond entrenched materialist views to incorporate the rich tapestry of subjective experiences and alternative theories.

• Mishlove’s Appreciation:
  [51:08] Mishlove praises Dr. Marin’s mental flexibility and rigorous thought, expressing eagerness for future dialogues that explore these transformative ideas.

• Final Thoughts:
  [52:00] Marin echoes the sentiment of ongoing exploration and the importance of keeping channels of open dialogue alive, emphasizing the dynamic and evolving nature of consciousness studies.

Notable Quotes

• “I was in a tunnel... guides or avatars... offering help to get out of the well. I politely declined... I wasn’t particularly concerned at first, but later realized its significance.”
  — Alex Gomez Marin [02:15]

• “Science is just getting closer and closer to this edge, and we cannot pretend... we need to harmonize experience with knowledge and science.”
  — Alex Gomez Marin [24:52]

• “They use the word pseudoscience. I mean, Jeff, you and I are used to maybe being called pseudoscience pseudoscientists or swimming in the so called pseudoscience waters. We don't think they are.”
  — Alex Gomez Marin [28:54]

• “Consciousness cannot be reduced merely to physical interactions. It requires embodiment—emotions, flesh, and subjective experiences.”
  — Alex Gomez Marin [46:44]

Conclusion

This episode offers a thought-provoking exploration of consciousness through the lens of neuroscience, philosophy, and personal experience. Dr. Alex Gomez Marin challenges the entrenched materialist perspective, advocating for a more inclusive and phenomenologically grounded approach. Jeffrey Mishlove and Dr. Marin articulate the necessity for paradigm shifts in scientific inquiry, emphasizing the importance of integrating subjective experiences with objective research to truly understand the essence of consciousness.

For those intrigued by the mysteries of the mind and the evolving landscape of neuroscience, this episode provides invaluable insights and invites listeners to reconsider the fundamental nature of reality and consciousness.

Thank you for tuning into the New Thinking Allowed Audio Podcast. Your support enables us to continue producing enlightening conversations at the forefront of knowledge and discovery.